Hey Guys, nice interview. However the audio and video lack synchronization, somewhere in the middle. Some parameter in your upload messed up.
@2NJB4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! We'll look into it. You can always listen on our website www.2njb.com
@Deactivist4 жыл бұрын
I like the coke logo better than the English one. Yep... That's my comment.
@motelhoffman4 жыл бұрын
Eytan at min. 7:00-7:40 asks a great question concerning Palestinian nationhood based on their 100 years history in the land of Israel: 'How much of a history do you need to have a right to a place?' Feiglin, before answering, mentions the post-modernist view that we all can create nationalities and identities. He makes it sound absurd as a way of refutation of Eytan's question. He then goes on to answer it by basing nationhood rights in being identified with (the essence of) God the creator of the world who grants the right to whomever he chooses. He concludes that therefore atheistic Zionism has no right to displace the locals since they don't use the God claim check. Naor (min.10) tries to argue but a weak articulation lets Feiglin get away. The argument against Feiglin is twofold; a) No person as religious as he is has the right to expel people or rob them from their right to a country / state because of theocratic beliefs. b) The very post-modernist view Feiglin tried to do away with, is indeed very legitimate and powerful. Eytan as a libertarian should understand it. Basically, any person or people who own land can in principle decide that they create a country / state of their own provided that they can sustain themselves on their own with all the structures needed for an independent living system. Practically however, one needs to own vast amounts of connected lands for such to happen. Concerning our subject; in light of the above, length of history of land ownership is irrelevant (besides for the new-coming first generation people whether they arrived as conquerors or as visiting workers, who in many cases can be refused the right to become citizens of an existing country). If they own land, they could theoretically build their own country / state, but as said they must be independent, which they usually are not. Now; the next generation born in the land, their birth is their history and they have all the right to any country / state created over their land. Here in Israel therefore, all who have connecting land have the right to create their own country / state which would generally mean that wherever Israelis live the state will be Israel and wherever Palestinians live it will be Palestine. This is the libertarian way and if Feiglin would adopt full libertarianism without mixing it with his personal theocratic beliefs when it comes to the land of Israel, he'd have a good shot in the elections because many Israelis are libertarians at their core.
@knyazhefilms21543 жыл бұрын
it was interesting to read your opinion. thank you!
@sarahlynn47904 жыл бұрын
Making deals with Satan much? I KNOW!!!
@urielm7742 ай бұрын
He's not libertarian lmao
@logicalconceptofficial2 жыл бұрын
Who genuinely wants proof that God is God and will listen? Anyone?
@AniBAretz10 ай бұрын
Correction for 59 minute mark: US did not create "one nation under God." The original motto of the United States of America was and should still be "E Pluribus Unum", which is Latin for "Out of Many, One." That is, out of many people, representing many cultures, religions, prior citizenships, etc., one unifed American people. As for "one nation under God", that didn't start until the mid-1950s, as a response to Communism overseas, thinking it would help to identify communists hiding or spying in the U.S.
@gregoryglavinovich92594 жыл бұрын
do you know about the Anunnaki from the planet Nibiru who designed our DNA ?? Enlil led Moses and Marduk led Pharaoh. Some say that Enlil was Jesus
@OZcomingFRoo2 ай бұрын
Dude.... dude... listen. I know where you heard that theory, and let me tell you something simple... it's a theory that doesn't go any where. Would you be so kind to actually start a conversation that isn't about something ridicilous? Like, what's your opinion on Moshe Feiglin?