Most Brutal Mughal Emperor - Aurangzeb's Story Explained In 20 Minutes

Watch The Full Episode Here: • Aurangzeb & Shivaji Ma...
Listen To The Full Episode On Spotify: open.spotify.c...
🎧 Listen To #TheRanveerShow On Spotify:
open.spotify.c...
Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind
Get Android - bit.ly/Android...
Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE
Know more about Level :
bit.ly/levelli...
Follow Medha Bhaskaran's Social Media Handles:-
Instagram: / medha.deshmukh.bhaskaran
Facebook: / medha.bhaskaran
Twitter: / medhadb
LinkedIn: / medha-bhaskaran-467ba2139
✅ Subscribe To Our Other KZbin Channels:-
BeerBiceps (English Channel):
/ beerbicepsofficial
Ranveer Allahbadia (Hindi Channel):
/ ranveerallahbadia
TRS Clips हिंदी (Hindi Podcast Highlights):
/ @theranveershowhindi
BeerBiceps Shorts (English Shorts):
/ @bestoftrs
Ranveer Allahbadia Shorts (Hindi Shorts):
/ @bestoftrshindi
BigBrainco. :
/ @raaazofficial
BigBrainco. Shorts :
/ @raaazclips
Welcome to the 3-part special on the story of Shivaji Maharaj, always waited to present this to the audience. Our guest today is Medha Bhaskaran, a microbiologist, an author, and another all-star of The Ranveer Show. The wealth of knowledge she has is truly incredible, honoured to host Medha ma'am at our space for such fantastic episodes we created with her. In this episode, we go into the depths of the Mughal empire, before the Shivaji Maharaj era, and what was the country's socio-economic status back then, what was the reality of the kings and the emperors who ruled our land mass. REAL Stories Of Indian History Uncovered - Watch out.
Medha Bhaskaran, from the year 2000 onwards, started studying Mughal Maratha history as she felt passionate about it. More than a hundred books were referred to, forts visited, and discussions with historians, weapon experts and other people involved in the subjects continued. She is the author of Shivaji's bestselling biography, Challenging Destiny. Amazon Link: www.amazon.in/....
This episode is a 3-part conversation starting from the rule of the Mughal Empire, before the Shivaji Maharaj era, then part 2 where we talk about the times when India saw the rise of Shivaji Maharaj, and then comes part 3 where we talk about his final vision. Stay Tuned as Part 2 and Part 3 of this series will be released in the following two Tuesdays of the Month of October.
#aurangzeb #1635
INSTAGRAM : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
FACEBOOK : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
TWITTER : @beerbicepsguy
/ beerbicepsguy
LINKEDIN : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
TELEGRAM: @beerbicepsguy
t.me/beerbicep...
SNAPCHAT: @beerbicepsguy
----------------------------------------------
About :
TRS Clips is a collection of SHORT CLIPS from The Ranveer Show podcast. Enjoy our latest knowledge-fueled videos from the BeerBiceps team. Every conversation on #TheRanveerShow is intellectual, deep & progressive. We cover everyone from entrepreneurs to Bollywood film stars to even athletes.
Today, The Ranveer Show or TRS - Happiness Through Curiosity. A show where we host the world's greatest success stories and try digging out their secrets to success. Every conversation is an EXTREME learning experience for the viewer.

[@TheRanveerShowClips]

Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE Know more about Level : bit.ly/levellinktree

[@OP-wo1ku]

circumstances does not define you....its what path you choose in those circumstances define you...........

[@OP-wo1ku]

Aurangzeb might be a great Administrator or a battle hardened cunning man ....but so was Hitler.......its what path u choose to apply your talents that define you.............

[@Mongodbtutordenvercolorado]

10:06 its not Murad the mughal prince you have picture of Murad the ottoman emperor.

[@kanchansaha8127]

@@OP-wo1ku I yyyyyyy9

[@jaiho550]

Hello heard lot about Mughals torture. When will u continue talks after Shivaji born ???? Why to expand negative more. When u have positive ahead.??

[@dcube369]

Madam, it's not the circumstances that make a man bad or good....rather, the path one chooses in a given circumstance makes him good or bad

[@ranjanir906]

maybe, maybe not

[@pdp9459]

She said babies , not a man

[@somjack41]

Yes. Rana Pratap, Chhatrapati Shivaji maharaja and greatest of lord Lord Ram are few great examples.

[@agathosdaimon9433]

These are just romanticised utopian sayings. Put your self in such a place for real and then try to stick with your 'good bad' ethics.

[@chaplinerror356]

Yes . The same boiling water softens a potato and hardens an egg. It depends on what you're mad of , not the circumstances.

[@nycdenali4985]

Murad was drunkard who was sent to gujrat and drank all the liquor now gujrat is a dry state Edit : thanks for the likes lol

[@movie6888]

Hahah 🤦‍♂️😂coz of him..

[@mithiyankumar4718]

😄😄😄

[@dev1089]

HE WAS IMPRISONED IN GWALIOR FORT AND MADE TO DRINK OPIOM SERBET DAILY HE BECAME A DRUG ADDICT AND BEHEADED FROM USA

[@crypton_8l87]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@bilalahmad-tr3ty]

Iss sajjan ko kya takleef hay...😂

[@rishabhdubey6902]

7:50 they were rich because they combined their forces and fought a battle with Vijaynagar and destroyed hampi. Diomnds and Riches were loaded on about 1000 elephants.

[@vasantm6023]

Exactly. They became rich by raiding vijaynagar empire not by trade.

[@gopichand6640]

Tirumalaraya took entire treasury and went to penugonda before destruction of city

[@tanvirshaikh7415]

Vijayanagara was defeated in 1500s. Aurangzeb born after 1600 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@gopichand6640]

@@tanvirshaikh7415 correct urself the empire was defeated in 1565 in talikota capital got destroyed but empire is intact till 1614 till Veera prathapa venkatapathy Devaraya 2 after his death in 1614 decline started buy 1646 the empire ended

[@tanvirshaikh7415]

@@gopichand6640 ...So by the time Aurangzeb came to scene...there wasn't much left to loot. It was already looted by the Deccan Sultanates

[@SuryaIsSurya]

When Dara Shikoh says he does not want to be a pearl but he wants to be an ocean...he wants to say he does not want to limit himself as just a body which will come, stay and then leave this world. He wants to realize awareness where you are no longer the body but the awareness/consciousness (which is the vast ocean). Dara Shikoh had talks with many Hindu intellectuals and understood the depth of Vedas and Upanishads. He did a deep study of them and translated almost half of the Upanishads in Persia(almost 50 I believe). Dara took the Vedas and Upanishads to the other part of the world through these translations. He would have translated all of the Upanishads but midway Aurangzeb killed him.

[@SuryaIsSurya]

@Netaji-The British Slayer One who has read, understood Vedas and Upanishads cannot be bad for sure. Our Vedas and Upanishads can purify anyone

[@HaiderAli-bh8ce]

Why didn't he accept Hinduism then🤡?? He was becoming more like mulhid(atheist) a threat to islamic empire Sultan ul azeem Aurangzeb did a better move to kill him

[@Divineenergy551]

This is history we are taught, can you tell from whom he learned Vedas and Upanishads, the names of vedic Scholars , who helped translate them? There are 3 vedas to study each veda it takes 12 years, leave alone Upanishads,

[@SuryaIsSurya]

@@Divineenergy551 check upanishad Ganga episode 8 on youtube where you will get to know about it

[@shubhamtripathi2971]

Dara might have become 2nd Akbar in his tolerance policy towards Hindus. He was different kind of personality,he always praised Vedas and Upanishads .,but unfortunately

[@abhishekdarade4661]

We will not forget how brutally Aurangzeb killed our Chatrapati sambhaji Maharaj..... Jai shiv shambhu ❣️

[@moin6077]

Ok. Don't forget.

[@Krishna-lo9dt]

@@moin6077 Maharaj Sambhaji ke badle kitne topiwale mlechhe gaye😈 ..Jai Shiv Shambhu 🚩🚩 Balidaan saval hua, Hindu Rashtra banega Bharat 🚩🚩🚩🇮🇳

[@chemistryka14]

@@moin6077 please don't forget how a small sikh army thr@shed a huge chu-ghal army with half the force

[@moin6077]

@@Krishna-lo9dt Kitne??

[@ramugoudar7772]

@@moin6077 They ended mughal rule.

[@mukulpal8875]

you must call j sai deepak..... he has better sense of history....and have courage to say the truth.....

[@Krishna-lo9dt]

Read Fatawa-e-alamgiri written by Aurangzeb and his committee. You should know that father of Shah Wahilullah who is responsible for Wahhabism was part of this committee who wrote Fatawa-e-alamgiri.

[@TarunKumar-kg1zb]

Agreed

[@OP-wo1ku]

He is too right for Ranveers show

[@ritvijpatankar731]

So true

[@danish-00]

btw he isn't a historian neither this lady.

[@rahuldubey3764]

She is describing history very well and not justifying any act.

[@behuman3801]

You are wrong. She has brilliantly justified everybody’s lifestyle and actions

[@ShujaSyed-e7j]

Yes

[@ShujaSyed-e7j]

Dont get emotional man

[@AH-hd8mf]

She is really an intellectual,she makes sense beyond what is taught in history books

[@expeditioner9322]

What's an intellectual?

[@micecollective7555]

She is very sincere and strives to be honest, unlike that Abhijit Chavda would is very emotional and makes statements such as "democracy was invented in India" he is one of this invention x was invented in India and the rest of the world just copied.

[@askme9572]

@@micecollective7555 India's metality is religious , not democratic . Real democracy and real religion are enemies of each other .

[@nkj3985]

She is non sense lady। She is talking nonsense. If we believe in her logic, we have to Give clean chit to Adolf Hitlar too....he was not bad,,he was not cruel,,but circumstances madee him cruel.. She can even justify a rapist too.... Rapist is not born bad ,, but circumstances turned an innocent to Rapist. Its pathetic that such people are so called BUDDHIJIVI ( intelactuals)

[@TripleStorm95]

Dara Shikoh - I don't want to become a pearl in the ocean. I want to ....*Killed* 😂😂

[@cs-a7n]

Be honest, you want him to be killed bcuz he was secular

[@mrbme]

Love how u people pick Aurangazeb ahead of Dara shikoh bcz Aurangazeb was kattar and Dara Shikoh was secular.

[@SANJAY0911]

Madam, Hyderabad Nizam became rich because of Looting of Vijayanagara Empire (Who used to sell Diamonds like how Vegetables are sold on street today). There is a urban legend that it took 6 months for Nizams to Transport Looted treasures from Hampi to Hyderabad.

[@theman-wq1jt]

Tu tha kya vaha pe

[@AkashDas-go4mv]

@@theman-wq1jt nehi bhai usne padhai kiyi hai Jo tune bhi karna chahiye tha

[@kshitijagrawal7984]

And then to England

[@Captainprice05]

@@theman-wq1jt tere baap ne tujhe paida karne me mehnat ki thi tu tha kya waha 💀💀

[@sadiqbasha6010]

Did Nizam took money outside India?

[@AjayKumar-dv4pq]

Her enthusiam for history is infectious!

[@AbdulRehman-kz7lc]

I am infected 🙀🙀

[@johnskuttysabu7915]

Next romila.thaper.?

[@Starscream_313]

It's not infectious...

[@tejasmishra3297]

@@johnskuttysabu7915 Romila Thapar is an idiot.

[@RecitationOfQuran1]

Alamgir Aurangzeb Nightmare of Traitors ❤❤❤ ISLAM ZINDABAD 😊

[@aqdassyed6572]

He had most number of Hindu court nobles , stop learning history from watsapp

[@mrbme]

Dude u r the one learning from WhatsApp 😂...that's y u said a point without context to justify Aurangazeb. He also said he won't destroy temples anymore but whenever some hindu king try to wage war he used to destroy temples. So his style of rule was like Dictator. If u follow me then I'll be good or else I'll show my evil side. Sad that many muslims pick Aurangazeb ahead of Dara Shikoh just bcz his killing skills were good and same muslims will cry secularism bro in current world😂 A guy called Dara Shikoh talked about Secularism in india in 15th century. U people should proudly flaunt him but u don't. Just introspect.

[@sumuqh]

If i had grandmother like her, I'd be a historian

[@asadmakes3879]

He kept saying I don't remember I don't think so I could be wrong and maybe maybe maybe plus she's being very biased towards people she's using brave words for rajput but not such treatment for Aurangzeb alamgir and little info Aurangzeb never ate from the kingdom treasures he used to make caps and sell them and he used to eat bread and water

[@user-vn7vr1oy2j]

@@asadmakes3879 he fixed amount of water per day to his own father.shahjehan died thirsty.

[@kattarsanatani-Jaisriram]

​@@asadmakes3879 of course u would defend that bloody.,.. As your Ancestor praise him.

[@asadmakes3879]

@@user-vn7vr1oy2j yes cause wasting water is bad and his father wasted alot of money on Taj mahal that could have been used for poor people and Aurangzeb Alamgir never ate fancy food and he used to make caps from his own hands and sell them and eat bread water imagine how he was

[@mrtraveller11111]

I may hand my self to the police officers

[@vspatmx7458]

God bless this woman. And may her health improve so that she can do justice to more in her future books

[@moin6077]

Aurangzeb was a Genius military strategist and tactician. While he was alive nobody could defeat the Mughal Empire.

[@ytpremium4997]

So what we let that slide in that he killed lakhs of Hindus?

[@shubhamshinde3318]

Then why couldn't he defeat shivaji maharaj who had only one hundredth of mughal army

[@moin6077]

@@shubhamshinde3318 He defeated him in many battles. The only battles he lost was in the mountains. Shivaji could never create an empire till Aurangzeb was alive.v

[@shubhamshinde3318]

@@moin6077 aurangzeb didnt created his empire the mughal empire was in india for more than 100 years before aurangzeb and which battles are you talking about i can name more battles than you where shivaji maharaj defeated aurangzeb

[@moin6077]

@@shubhamshinde3318 The Mughal empire expanded to its peak under Aurangzeb. Not Akbar, not Jahangir, not Humayun. If Shivaji Maharaj was so successful against Aurangzeb, why did this happen? And btw .. the Mughals in total ruled for around 200 years including Aurangzeb.

[@sandeepbadwal6747]

I think we found Indian version of Audrey truschke. We give her 20 minutes more she's will prove that aurangzeb's all evil deeds will be for his strengthening of his position and wo (aurangzeb) Dara hua tha isliye usko karna pada ye katle aam 😤😤😤😤😤

[@MAMK717]

Yaar itna baised opinion na du wo sahi keh rahi Hain.story ki dono sides ko Dekho USS waqt mein reh kar socho

[@akhtaruzzamanjoy8524]

this is history man! accept it! Auranzeb behaved just what time tells him to do!

[@krushnamore7729]

@@Uzair823 Jese Muhammad be Ayesha ke sath kiya tha?? Apni aukat mat bhul Katmulle punctureputra

[@Uzair823]

@@krushnamore7729 Look whose talking about aukat dalit , saale jab mughal empire raj kar raha ta tumhare pardada jhar par latak kar gow mutre pee rahe the 🤣🤣 REMEMBER LINDUS GOW MUTRE 2 LITRES ROZ SUBHA AUR RAAT PEENA CHAHIYE HEALTH KE LIYE 😆😆😅😅🌊🌊🍺🍺🐄🐄 Ram m🅰derchood 🐖💨🚩🕉 Hag Hag chakkadev 🐖💨🕉 Shiv ka kãtá lûllï 🖕🏾 Rãñdï sita 🐖💨🕉 Rāñdï durga 😂🐖💨🕉 Ràñdï saraswati 😂🐖💨🕉 Rãñdî Parvati 🤤🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾 Rãñdï kålî 🖕🏾🐖💨🕉 Rãñdî Làdhä 🐖💨🕉 Ràñdï rukmini 🖕🏾🐖💨🕉

[@whitewhite4462]

@@MAMK717 and this Zamana also people are interested in ghazwa hind . That's why rss has erupted, u gotta balance the equation lhs=rhs hence proved lol. U guys act as if rss has done suicide bombing and bani qurayza of people. Oh wait ✋ only "some " people like isis, al quad, boko haram, al shabab, taliban, huriyat, mujahideen,....yeah only some.

[@thecollegeofra]

The Pearl & The ocean 🌊 poem by Aurangzeb’s brother …. My interpretation: He doesn’t want to be an individual, separated from everyone else, shining brightly. He wants to merge with the Universe and become all things. His dying actually makes sense in this context.

[@eerankisriram]

May be it means that he wants to give shelter for pearls rather than being a pearl

[@ikram11003]

Pearl is king,, and the 🐚 is the Kingdom. Ocean have many such 🐚. He desired to be the King of Kings.

[@UPAKHOSALA]

@@ikram11003 stupid comments, he was great

[@ikram11003]

@@UPAKHOSALA He never became a king. He was a prince. A second in line to be a king. Someone who can't win his own kingdom , even by support of his king father, of almost all royal army, and the wealth more than 100 times that of his opponents. He was a better shayer, a good philosopher but King is one who wins the war and claim the Throne. To be a great king is few more steps from king. A king who controls other kingdoms directly . Alexander, Akbar, , Ashoka, Aurangezeb. Cyrus, Queen Elizabeth GenGhis Khan, Teng Taizong. Kings and prince who can't rule freely in there own kingdom, are given the title of Great because you prefer them. Dil ke khus rakhne ko khayal aacha hai. He was good to be a teacher, a philosopher, a writer, comparing to Aurangezeb . But not as a king.

[@danachats8944]

I agree. The analogy of raindrop snd ocean a part of discourses in Hindu philosophy….. when atman realises it is one with Brahman. It IS the ocean.

[@ChadBrahh]

Kasab was a sweet child. It's the circumstances that made him do what he did, please don't abuse Ajmal Kasab 😀

[@kviolin1313]

@@MahiMahi-yw8or 🤣 Stupid!

[@notherepim]

Just like Hitler 🤗

[@Nitya-r86]

hahaha...well said...

[@masterbodhi9737]

Dadi is in Love ❤️ with Auranganzeb 😂 Please don't blame him for anything , He was a sweet child , Only the circumstances were responsible for his behaviour

[@sajidashaikh131]

She is looking at history objectively. If you have to learn lessons from history, I.e. how you look at it.If you look at it with bias, you will not learn from it.

[@masterbodhi9737]

@@sajidashaikh131 😂 Sajida , we are talking about Auranzeb not Akbar So please be rational and follow your own advice and admit that He Was a Tyrant

[@AdnanKhan-su4ko]

Which behavior?

[@vikrantpatil5259]

@@AdnanKhan-su4ko fucking his own daughter in law.

[@sajidashaikh131]

From what I read, I gather, he was politically driven. Not religiously as many people claim. And as a king , you have to be politically driven. Many people claim , he destroyed temples, but it is history , he took care of many temples As well. The Rajputs had enjoyed during his rule and they were loyal to him till death. They were also Hindus. And compared to other Moghul kings , he was the most decent based on character. See the politics now, what is happening . It is the same. Religion is used for politics. It is not religion which causes this.

[@gauravpoojari6297]

This lady was the real mother of aurangzeb and his bother because she knows him very well 😂

[@sauron2000000]

😆

[@sajidashaikh131]

Why can’t you study history objectively. Why do you think it’s necessary to color everything with religious colors. The battles that took place between the Mughals and another Rajas were for political reasons. There was nothing religious in it. Many Hindus fought with Mughals and many Muslims fought with Marathas. Mughals were tyrannical, and they were like that even with their own kith and kin for political reasons.And even the other kingdoms had their infighting. But if you compare Aurangazeb with other Mughal emperors , he was much better. He did not squander money, was not ayyash. and was a righteous person. Since he was the emperor it is his duty to guard his kingdom from all enemies. Within his kingdom as well as outside.But ai agree with the historian when she says the local subedaar and jabaldaar took undue advantage of the power given to them. And that was the weakness of the Mughal empire.

[@gauravpoojari6297]

@@sajidashaikh131 so u r now his child right ? U too known the situation of that time very well. So what's ur age huh?🤦‍♂️

[@afnankhan7086]

@@gauravpoojari6297 Well read the comments you'll find thousands of sons of shivaji with there perspective of history based on there WhatsApp Group and Facebook pages....That woman is a historian, read history from hundreds of books and Some pikachus think that they know everything after reading a facebook post🤦

[@gauravpoojari6297]

@@afnankhan7086 firstly i don't use any social media and i have studied from an English school not in any madrasa. Secondly yes i am a proud son of chatrapati shivaji maharaj atleast he did not kill his 3 younger brother and jailed his father. He can be ur father in the name of ur religion u can defend a bastard by putting islam in everything.

[@GumbieUsaGames]

Mulhid (Munafiq) : a Muslim person who believes or even thinks that there are other gods than Allah are all Munafiq and are valid to be killed as per Qur'an or islam. Our dear madam feels uncomfortable explaining some of these terms. Thanks 👍👍👍

[@AnasKhan-fg5kz]

Mulhid means athiest Munafiq means hypocrite

[@pushpenderrana6190]

Why are we civil and at a loss for words when talking to or about barbarians and their barbaric religion

[@cs-a7n]

☪️ancer

[@Nandini-cc4vb]

I love learning history in conversational formats. Very well done!

[@1ds05ec072]

Having watched the full length of the three part podcast and reading the comments here has been such an eye opener... When things are cut and pasted without full context gives amazingly wrong picture of what is being conveyed...

[@sourav_2903]

true af!

[@Krishna-lo9dt]

Call Sanjay Dixit from The Jaipur Dialogues to get correct understanding of history. Highly requested

[@sohomi3031]

The meaning of this podcast is , muscle prevails over intellectual always. Ruthlessness is what required .

[@sajidashaikh131]

No, it means you should be tactical, if someone attacks you, you should be ready to defend yourself. You cannot say , I am an intellectual. And king , Atleast at those times kings were supposed to be warriors. See the great kings according to Hindu tradition as well. They were good warriors.

[@whatt57]

I think it is and was about playing to your strengths. Not every army or side will fight the same way. Marathas used guerilla warfare to outsmart the numbers advantage of the Mughals. Similarly the Mughals would use strategies and tactics suited to their strengths. Some kings and generals would use other diplomatic and political stratagems to gain advantage over their enemies. It is definitely not a one size fits all thing.

[@Dharmayuddha1991]

Agreed.. ruthless

[@SanilJadhav711]

@@whatt57 Perfectly said

[@Fitness4Freshies]

Intellectual is needed in the battlefield as well.

[@sudhirgupt219]

It seems that Jnu wisdom is just advocating the badshah aaurangzeb... He was stunch kattar muslamaan in his entire life first.

[@mansooraqureshi2696]

According to European Scholars,Aurengzeb was not the favourite of Shah Jehan,that is why he was sent to Deccan to suppress the revolts,this is where he mastered the art of warfare n became a hardened soldier....his brothers knew it and were constantly intriguing to kill him. But in the battle field it was Aurengzeb who prevailed. The Historians research also indicate,if Dara Shikwoh had survived,Aurengzeb would have been eliminated, too. It was do or die for Aurengzeb. Nothing is simple straightforward in War of succession.

[@mrbme]

How does that even matter to u?? All it matters to u is who is better individual. Aurangazeb or Dara Shikoh? Is it so tough to pick between Bin Laden and APJ Abdul Kalam?? Dont understand the obsession to justify Aurangazeb🙏🙄

[@IQRA718]

@@mrbme do you know the meaning of war of succession??? It was aurangzeb who made India a golden parrot. Indeed he was one of the finest and capable administrator of Indian history. The magadh empire, the first empire in the Indian history was founded by bimbisara who was killed by his own son ajatshatru and who was also killed by his son and this thing continued. Capable rulers eliminated the earlier ruler s and there are abundant causes . Cheap mentality like you won't understand this simple thing. Tell me one thing who eliminated the successors of shivaji and became actual ruler of the maratha???

[@IQRA718]

@@mrbme why the successors of shivaji were eliminated???

[@mrbme]

@IQRA718 Aurangazeb had almost entire Akhand Bharat. Still it collapsed. Marathas even after shivaji got back their parts after Aurangazeb. So definitely the successors of Marathas were far better. If they had a kingdom size of Aurangazeb it wouldn't have collapsed that bad. Aurangazeb died in 1707 and by 1757 East India Company was already dominating. Still my point is not about battlefield skills of Aurangazeb. He was a tyrant as a person. Just one curious question. Aurangazeb or Dhara Shikoh.. Whom do u select as a leader??

[@IQRA718]

@@mrbmeafter the death of aurangzeb in 1707 the marathas under peshwa (not the successors of shivaji) rose up . Peshwa eliminated the successors of shivaji and ruled. You tell me why did peshwa eliminate the successors of shivaji??? Why do you think he was a tyrant???

[@IndigenousVoices]

“The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilisation is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within." - Will Durant (1885 - 1981 A.D) American Historian, Writer and Philosopher

[@abdullahtariq2032]

“If we rated greatness by the influence of great, one has to accept that Muhammad Pbuh was the greatest man to ever live.” -will Durant, despite being a pious christian

[@whitewhite4462]

Why don't you explain me bani qurayza and qr an 8: 38?

[@logicalthinker483]

Hindutva supporter will follow a british so called historian who was looting the country and massacring the masses. Pity on you.

[@logicalthinker483]

@@whitewhite4462 why dont you explain me your whole contradicting religious texts. There are even many different versions of Bhagawath gita itself.

[@whitewhite4462]

@@logicalthinker483 does my religious text tell to bother about other religions? Does it matter? . Islam is the only religion that bothers about other religions (kafiroon, murtad,jahannum,ghair muslim, shaitaan)instead of minding its buisness . What is your exact problem with us?

[@thephenominalbeast7106]

Auragzeb was very good on battlefields the best joke this young lady threw.😹😹

[@sajidashaikh131]

It is history.

[@first9_yt]

@@nikhilsharma5210 History should never be looked from only one perspective. History has many perspectives.

[@love_Kholiya]

@@first9_yt commander not a warrior

[@first9_yt]

@@love_KholiyaYou mean that he never fought in battles? Then you are wrong.

[@love_Kholiya]

@@first9_yt mughal badshahs never fight with themselves, they are always in the end of the army, it's a turkic style of army formation, in Indian style raja was in the front of the army, you can search there is not a single incident where aurangzeb fight hand to hand with enemy bravely.

[@momojafar9385]

Aurangzeb was a chad, bro annihilated his competition.

[@awesomestevie27]

Then he read Guru Gobind Singh Jis Zafarnama and died from a broken heart

[@cs-a7n]

He was the last mughal emperor he was the reason mughal failed, in the end he himself realized he was a failure.

[@awesomestevie27]

@ProudAtheist-b3w I mean it’s true, he requested to meet the guru too, he was also old, but loosing ones will to live usually kills someone especially when they are already old Read the Zafarnama yourself

[@mrbme]

Mughal Emperor destroyed bcz of him😂...bcz there was no future with his kind of ruling. If Dara Shikoh was the king ahead of Aurangazeb definitely the Mughal empire would have lasted longer. Only Sar Tan se Jhuda muslims pick Aurangazeb ahead of Dara Shikoh... Who have long term vision would definitely pick Dara Shikoh. Dara Shikoh being secular would have made sure Mughal Empire last longer...may be India would have been a Soft Islamic country like UAE. But funny thing is many muslims doesn't see this way when it comes to Aurangazeb and Dara Shikoh. Their obsession to pick Aurangazeb actually proves a point.

[@shavez_rana]

​@@awesomestevie27 chikh made up story 😂😂😂

[@sandeepbadwal6747]

Her words for aurangzeb reminds me Audrey truschke love for most cruel in this planet aurangzeb.

[@zaheer855]

Ranveer is like a math student in History classes.

[@sksaif0203]

Babur bhai aap zinda kab huye..😂😂

[@ruthikan6262]

Soo true 🤣

[@ibrrana]

He has lack of knowledge

[@logicalthinker483]

Ofcourse. He is intrstd only in subscriber number

[@None12768]

@@ibrrana thats why he is putting up questions! Do you know about every field? Nonsense

[@robincruz4]

"What's a manuscript?" I know we are all learning, but...

[@didi437]

*Title should be this lady's perspective of Aurangzeb's story*

[@dot407]

The most brutal mughal emperor was deafeated by extra brutal "the AHOMS",

[@dmnxexotic0p55]

The Ahoms ruled in the jungle which nobody needed that's why mughals never focused on north eastern parts

[@dot407]

@@dmnxexotic0p55 lion always stays in the jungle bro,17 times they invaded this jungle but never win it,read assam history or ahom history, aurangzeb's army general mir jumla wrote " i have never seen this type(ahom) of wrrior in my life"his speech was written in Shihabuddin talish(his historian)'s fathiya-i-ibriya(persian chronical).

[@dmnxexotic0p55]

@@dot407 Ahoms didn't expand their territory because they were not capable of doing so + if mughals would've launched a full fledged attack on Ahoms they obviously would have taken over. They never wanted it cuz it was in the jungle and that was useless Ahoms are overrated

[@dot407]

@@dmnxexotic0p55 they didnt want to expand their territory because they dont need it,they ruled their own territory called"Boraxhom",which territory was never capturd by the mughals.

[@dmnxexotic0p55]

@@dot407 they had a small kingdom it can't be compared to the mughals

[@Tayyab_m]

10:06 There is a slight error in the picture shown in the video. He is not Murad Bakhsh (Shah Jahan's son) but Ottoman Sultan Murad I, who lived and died in the 14th century.

[@HumayunMohammed]

lol for views n his survival kuch bhi youtubers

[@gabbar51ngh]

I was wondering the same thing. He looks ottoman.

[@mayurvibes2914]

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ke jaii

[@Pookiekittyo]

Shivaji maharaj ki jai

[@tharunsuresh3536]

🎉

[@moin6077]

K

[@Ayush_Kumar_youtube]

Jai Bhavani Jai Shivaji.. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was the best King India ever had 🤟

[@krkrkr5487]

🚩🚩

[@faheemsheikh8432]

Killing brothers for throne was common in early times

[@freework4989]

@powet5341 If you want a good king with principal then you can read the history of Sultan Salauddin 😎

[@mrbme]

It doesn't justify Aurangazeb though. All it matters to people is what kind of individual he is not his battlefield talents🙄🙏... I seriously don't understand muslims obsession to pick Aurangazeb ahead of Dara Shikoh just bcz Aurangazeb has better ruthless killing skills😂🙏

[@ayushdhingra855]

Every ruler was not involved in those shit man..

[@AnkitUdawant]

That Aurangzeb killed our King Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj by torture.He insisted him to convert his religion from Hindu to Muslim.But Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj kept on refusing even getting brutally tortured by him

[@burnop2150]

Agr aurangjeb chatrapati ko na marta to vo aurangjeb ko marta

[@burnop2150]

Mughal came to rule not to loot india..... At time of aurangjeb india's contribution to world GDP was 25℅ and India was economically the super power under his rule

[@love_Kholiya]

@@burnop2150 what about the per capita of people? Indian people's specially hindus are the poorest class in his regime, what can you do with 25% of world gdp when all your goods are looted by irani, afghnis, uzbeki and tajiks. If you read history carefully then you know that mass migration of these people's was happen in our country and because they know farsi (persian) very well they became a government officials and because they are muslim they get benefited by every scheme of government. They collect tax from hindus for their temple visit and send crores of rupees to mecca and medina and their homeland. If you search, you get a recorded history of thesse events

[@AnkitUdawant]

@@burnop2150 aur Aurangzeb ko kyu baksh dena chahiye tha Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj ne? His army literally looted us.

[@AnkitUdawant]

@@burnop2150 Haa..Jizya Tax lagake? Aur us zamane mein kounsa GDP calculation tha be? Mr.Whatsapp University

[@debudada]

Interesting anecdote : Shah Shuja who was involved in a civil war against Aurangzeb ,escaped to Burma with his family and retinues under the protection of the Burmese king . Due to a disagreement with the Burmese king Shuja tried to impose a coup , but was defeated and killed , his daughters were sent to a harem , his sons decapitated . Aurangzeb who was after Shuja's head before this , launched a campaign against Burma as a revenge and annexed Chittagong , which became a part of Indian territory there after and is a Bangladeshi territory now.

[@nangiana3487]

Actually Shah Shuja was not killed in Burma , infact he escaped from there and went towards Punjab , there he meat Sufi saint Habib sultan Nangiana , and spend his rest life there.

[@nangiana3487]

His grave is there today. In a Village named ( Dharema )Sargodha Punjab in Pakistan.

[@jommzom9715]

No wonder in Chittagong there are Burmese looking people

[@apoorvtiwari3293]

Dara shikoh curiosity to study the all religion can be taken as his desire to become the ocean maybe this is the reason he was sitting with all the pandits to study and know the difference between his and other religion. Maybe he wanted to run his empire in a very secular way so that people of different religion feel secure under his rule

[@krishanrathi9119]

Empire was already secular compared to other empires of that time, tragedy is when we start comparing them with todays standard, Aurengjeb make it radical for capturing it.

[@satyendratiwari2172]

@@krishanrathi9119 lol what 😂😂 aurangzeb empire was secular .😂. Demolishing 1000 of temples converting lakhs of hindus into muslim and killing 10000 of brahaman and chatriya makes you secular 😂wow...

[@satyendratiwari2172]

@@krishanrathi9119 and it's not about comparing on the criteria of today's standard taking lives were always ridiculous either in today's or in past times..

[@krishanrathi9119]

@@satyendratiwari2172 you seems to have reading issues, i clearly said Aurengjeb made it radical.

[@krishanrathi9119]

@@satyendratiwari2172 nowhere i defended Aurangzeb, he was a radical person and made all his allies his enemies which resulted in destruction of mugul empire, the secular aspect was due to Akbar.

[@muhammadshaheer124]

If some people think Mughals are so bad that they are changing their Muslim names, their biggest landmarks are "Taj Mahal", "Red Fort", "Delhi Masala Bazaar", "Chandni Chowk", Shahi Bridge, Jaunpur, Sundar. Nursery, Panjoor Garden, Khosrow Bagh in Prayagraj, Panjoor Bagh in Haryana, Chah Bagh in Kashmir "Pari Mahal, Nishat Bagh, Shalimar Bagh, Chashme Shahi, Virenag Garden, Achabal Bagh" and also "Qutab Minar". And if you are going down and visiting the city of cities, "Inside Delhi, its walls and gates" and "Agra" are like famous and bad cities, don't you go? And yes, the Qawwali which was started by a Muslim dictator Khusrau and the Qawwali whose main purpose was to remember Allah, which the so-called Hindu nation listens to with Indian passion, when are you going to end it? O Lord, you eat the offerings from them. If it is demolished, what will be done in the name of architecture in India which even foreigners come to see and lose their senses. Most of the people seem to appreciate Taj Mahal and Qutb Mahal, then how come RSS, BJP and their henchmen demolished Taj Mahal and Qutb Minar? If there is so much difference from Muslims.

[@rehbaralikhan420]

Ashoka killed his father and siblings for throne but he wasn’t cruel he was good 😂😂

[@danx8107]

Ashoka's father was killed by Ashoka's step brother and so King Ashoka killed his siblings who even tried to kill him. See bro, i hate them not just bez they were muslims, they were invaders who looted India. Peace!!

[@rehbaralikhan420]

@@danx8107 bro aurangzeb brother also killed aurangzeb then aurangzeb not killed his brothera and british is invaders he looted and get back Britain ne never looted get back home like afghanistan he lived and died to 1857

[@danx8107]

@@rehbaralikhan420 Yeah, Britishers were equally wrong. Bro, but all mughal invaders didnt do anything for the welfare of India. Just massacred and converted lot of non-Muslims and destroyed other places of worship.

[@rehbaralikhan420]

@@danx8107 but not at all time

[@weirdo8188]

@@danx8107 lmao you definitely read history from WhatsApp University. India was the biggest economy in the world during aurengzeb's rule. Your patriotic Marathas brought east india company in power. Read history from a neutral perspective. I don't believe in any religion but the way media is portraying history and then using religion to brainwash the youth is very dangerous

[@Its_shazzy007]

Its sad to see people in comment section playing hindu muslim cards.. Stop hatred. Its time to grow up from religious fights..

[@afnankhan7086]

I love how every Pikachu is having there own perspective of Aurangzeb based on their WhatsApp Group.......

[@shepherd-sheep]

Same thing goes to those who idolise him 😂, he was like every other king 😅

[@afnankhan7086]

@@shepherd-sheep True 98% of Indians learn from WhatsApp or Facebook......

[@bharat5964]

He was a cruel king who killed his own brother's

[@hellobye5097]

Ironically you are one of them.

[@ashrafulbizoy8048]

@@shepherd-sheep I agree some idolize him.... but as a muslim i don't like him that much.... He single handedly eliminated 3 Deccan Sultanates, stayed away from Delhi 27 years, seeds the foundation of the decline of the empire.....

[@abdullah.a.nahyan]

Some folks commenting here could not just digest historical facts due to their prejudice!

[@ae.ron-men_ezes]

This is true for most of the emperors. Not alone Mugals.

[@smithamaiya5986]

No. Mughals attacked our culture, our religion, our temples our women. Hindu rulers were not doing this. Hence mughals and delhi sulthans were anti hindu.

[@ae.ron-men_ezes]

@@smithamaiya5986 nothing was this binary.

[@darthrevan1856]

Lol ricebag, name one local emperor who were as blood thirsty as the Abrahamic invader scums

[@ae.ron-men_ezes]

@@darthrevan1856 😂

[@darthrevan1856]

@@ae.ron-men_ezes now now ,don't laugh out loud and show your church knowledge here.Not sure what's the difference between you and a British East Indian officer.

[@ACE-dc3yj]

10:05 that's ottoman king Murad not mughal prince 😂😂😂

[@contentsailor5764]

Lol, I knew that looked like an ottoman.

[@Daniel_Vaiphei]

I think men of all faith has always used religion to become stronger. They have used religion to do things that are inhumane. And all these atrocities were committed in the name of religion/faith but the main reason was/is always power. And History always repeats itself.

[@blazostark9347]

In the midst of GOT and its history of kings and empire its good to know more about our own Indian history. Maybe Bollywood should make something half as good as GOT based on our history with obviously a touch of fantasy to it.

[@krantikoganti]

Lol… always trying to copy the west. Why not create your own which Is not copied

[@imprem_prakash]

Somewhere somehow we had our own reasons for downfall and invasion, be it British, Mughal, Dutch, French, Purtgal. I wish we were united as one nation could have avoided multiple invasions.

[@SMBilal_7]

India was divided & all of them took its advantage

[@hanaf3495]

Just like European countries,India is also divided on the basis of their gods and goddess, language, regions ,etc.

[@Zarrar-Khn]

One thing I have seen in common whether one is Aurangzeb's critic or admirer is 'He was brave, punctual and clever'. Al Sultan al Azeem

[@sujanandakumar3638]

Yes he was brave in the wrong way that is why he had killed his siblings usual practice in many dynasties.

[@IQRA718]

@@sujanandakumar3638 Ashok, Kanishk, Chandra Gupta maurya ,bimbisara ajatsutra , pandya ,cholas did not fight to become the king 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Only Mughal fought 🤭🤭🤭😂😂😂😂

[@mrbme]

​@@IQRA718Fighting is different and being a tyrant is different. The day when many of u will understand this...this world would be peaceful.

[@shavez_rana]

​@@mrbme kis baat ki tyranny? Actual history padh jaake, parathao ne toh mandiro ko bhi loot maar ki thi

[@fazalahmed6820]

ashoka killed his 99 brothers before taking the throne so you can't cry about fights in the royal palace

[@kunalhazra1977]

This lady made right in beginning a conclusive statement. She said, Shahjahan thought Aurangzeb a threat to him. Why Aurangzeb only out of the four sons. Because he was aware of his ability to go to any extent to achieve his goal. Secondly, why was it necessary for him to humiliate Dara after capture in public procession. Why was it necessary for him to send the beheaded head of Dara to Shajahan! Was it not sadistic? There are many such examples of him displaying unnecessary cruelty.

[@satyendratiwari2172]

The most important thing .was that so necessary to kill dara bro was so much into religious activity. i can't understand how that was effecting orange Seb empire. ..he could have thrown him out of his dynasty saying you are not made for ruling emperor... The reason was dara was giving equal importance to all religion but orange seb couldn't bear this level of goodness 💀

[@StudentOf10]

Shah Jahan should have belittled Aurangazeb to such an extent in comparison to Daro Shiko, thereby causing Aurangazeb's ego to deem the production of Daro Shiko's head in front of Shah Jahan to prove his worth.

[@kunalhazra1977]

@@StudentOf10 May be that could be a reason. Belittling one son over another by the same father, there must be a reason. What Aurangzeb did to his already dead brother is not a benevolent heart. History of s be understood in the light of academics and not as a narretive with non academic objective.

[@StudentOf10]

@@kunalhazra1977 We cannot judge individuals who lived hundreds of years ago based on today's moral benchmarks, as all humans those days were way more aggressive on each other. Our standards of morality have changed because humanity has become much more peaceful.

[@kunalhazra1977]

@@StudentOf10 You are talking about aberration in society and it's widespread exposure due to electronic media. Humanity is inner quality of human being, your own judgement of right and wrong. It is unchanged.

[@samratsingh3096]

how to lie while smiling is an art in which this leady is on another level🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@shivambhokare1492]

Liberal dadi spotted*☠️

[@gshrdy5415]

Liberalism is considered weakness by foreigners.

[@GigWAIndia]

She is just telling the truth.

[@Parasuraman-ey4wo]

The poem means that I do not want to just become a beautiful Pearl (limiting myself) but become an entire ocean. Nice poem. Wonderful guest 👏.

[@hassanullahsatti2119]

TRS showing the photo of Ottoman sultan Murad as brother of Aurangzeb "Alamgir"........................ Me with miniscule historical knowledge : Sadge face

[@darknight5182]

Auragazeeb conqured maratha coutry and he ruled 50 years of akanda bharath totelly 💪💪

[@killerdj9430]

Chalo acha hua uno mar gaya

[@sujitkadam8386]

I will be waiting for Maratha women book. I have a daughter so would like her and myself to learn about strong and grounded women.

[@Justviewer10736]

This podcast is way better than whatsapp messages regarding mughals

[@sp6245]

AURANZEB KILLD HIS BROTHERS FOR THRONE

[@Mhmhind]

Even some vijayanagara kings came to throne after killing there competitors

[@prady7978]

So maam means they are just surviving not killing each other😂😂

[@paadu7466]

Plz invite j sai deepak. He has correct information abt mughals and a wide variety of concepts.

[@absar8304]

How do you know what is correct and what is wrong ? You just believe one agenda and think whatever you don't agree with is false

[@AdityaSingh-uj3zz]

Why? Because what he says conforms to your bias?

[@henryviii8808]

@@absar8304 it's not about history. It's about who fulfills your perspective and agenda

[@navinjoshi7120]

@@henryviii8808if it fulfils your agenda then it may not be true history - unbiased history needs documented realities not ‘could’ be stories 🤔

[@PiyushTiwariEducation]

@@navinjoshi7120 same for j sai . He is also fulfilling others side agenda . Truth lie between 2 🙏

[@anu2571]

Why we are learning about Aurangazeb, don't we have Indian kings, who murdered Hindus and raped Hindus are heroes now. What's wrong with her, She loves moghals. Why trs ranveer show is changing their perspective of this pod cost

[@sushkoli8034]

This podcast is portraying how Aurangzeb was to establish him as a antagonist in later coming podcast about Shivaji Maharaj.

[@disastergaming1009]

Beta Aurangzeb was an Indian king. Only Hindu kings don't qualify to be "Indian" King So dont be jealous of the great Mughal Legacy Instead learn about them Their mentality And how they managed to rule for a such a long time and even made India a superpower of the time.

[@sushkoli8034]

@@disastergaming1009 calling Mughals as indian kings would be same as calling British as Indian administrators just because they ruled India..

[@disastergaming1009]

@@xzx970 even I don't expect you to understand because you must be a andhbhakt so chill

[@lordmorpheusss]

@@disastergaming1009 atleast he's not andh namaazi

[@prajwalupadhyay133]

mughals made battle royale before battle royale was invented

[@sukhjitsohal1502]

The lady has clearly explained the bad deeds of Mughals as well in other parts. But the only reason people are so triggered in comments section is because she said Aurangzeb was an excellent military commander. Hate Aurangzeb all you want but history will always remember him as the ruler that built one of the biggest empires in history. I hate Aurangzeb for the person he was but as a commander and ruler, he should be given the respect

[@serianakuppakkattu7292]

Why in Mahabharata, brothers killed each other? Why the eldest son Karan was killed by Arjuna? Why the entire Kaurava brothers were killed by Pandavas who were sons of younger brother Pandu? Think about it.

[@prasannabhosale706]

What do u want say...

[@serianakuppakkattu7292]

@@prasannabhosale706 To think. Brutal killing had been part of every ancient or medieval culture. No point in saying we were holy. What matters really is what we do at this age. There had been many brutal killing in the name of beef and ideology in our country. We have killed our own father of the nation. We had killed Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs based on religion in our country. We killed many Kashmiri pandits. They too are brutal. Let us stop this business of dividing people based on religion. We need to find the criminals among us and jail them.

[@prasannabhosale706]

@@serianakuppakkattu7292 agreed 🙌

[@mrbme]

Aurangazeb isn't hated just bcz he killed his brothers or left his father to death. To ur point of mahabharat ...Simple...they weren't tyrants like Aurangazeb. Forget about them even Akbar, Shah Jahan, Humayun kind of Mughal kings also weren't tyrants. There were better kings even in 4th-5th centuries of India. U r talking about 16th century. Common timeline doesn't justify Aurangazeb. It's isn't even tougher when u know he killed Dhara Shikoh who was actually a secular.

[@Krishna-lo9dt]

Call Sanjay Dixit from The Jaipur Dialogues or J Sai Deepak who have better sense of history and who bravely speak the truth in entirety about the black deeds of Mughals, middle Eastern colonisers, European colonisers and the Communists

[@sajidashaikh131]

She also discussed about their bad deeds. But your problem is she did not blame it on religion. And you all forget that the Mughals are descendants of Changez Khan who was not a Muslim.

[@gunslinger4779]

@@sajidashaikh131 so you’re saying Aurangzeb wasn’t a Muslim?

[@sajidashaikh131]

I am saying, please do not look at history and blame it on religion. These wars were not religious. These were wars for power and freedom(depends on the perspective). And Hindus and Muslims fought on both sides.

[@SandeepShankarGaur]

@@sajidashaikh131 but Aurangzeb is being called "Vali" by muslim scholars.. if mughals were not muslims, how's that happening??

[@jun2011jh]

Karma Karma Karma Karma Dont forget WB election what Feku said about falling of under construction bridge. Rip 😥😥😥😥 Act of "Goad " And boycott "Cadbury chocolate "

[@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz8041]

When aurangzeb himself says i follow my holybook i dont know why people say its circumstances.

[@yashwant6220]

Personally It hurts me when someone from Indian origin calls the river Ganga as Ganges, it shows how British ways are still dominating in our roots.

[@mohammadalichaudhary5201]

Even Indian history is full of such incidents. What was Mahabharat all about. A family rift where cousins wanted to kill each other for power and throne.

[@xzx970]

Ya but what were mughals doing in Bharat ? They don't belong here.

[@hammadraza9255]

Aurangzeb (alamgir) was a powerful religious king and his administration was well managed, he was fair minded and modest towered his people, but for revolters and enemies no doubt he was a beast for them.

[@love_Kholiya]

He Slaughtered cow in gujrat temple. I think cows son was doing a revolt against him, with the help of shahshuja army, he get a throne then killed shah shuja also, he killed shivaji son by cowardly captured him when he was travelling from one place to another, he killed jaswant singh son by giving him a shahi dress as gift but this dress have a poised fabric

[@hammadraza9255]

@@love_Kholiya again you are talking about revolters, that doesn't make him cruel, that the way a king deals with his enemies, specially when he needs to deal with them from all over his territory, he always needs to action instantly, else his regime will collapse. There is no authentic evidence which proves that he put cow meat in tample, and a logical oerson can understand that this kind of cheap activity can't be done by a powerful king like aurangzeb, who actually aided some tamples. And using "coward" word for mangol and turkish blood will make you a biased person, everyone knows, you can say they were cruel and acute, but they weren't cowards at all, think logically cowards cant rule for more than 6 to 8 centuries 🙏🏻

[@love_Kholiya]

@@hammadraza9255 which 6-8 century? Turcik rulers are purely a coward, just like maratha rulers who learned cowardness from them. They aren't fought a complete battle, they attacked at night, they haven't fought a war bravely. Maratha are successful because they uses the same strategies which was used by their babur

[@hammadraza9255]

@@love_Kholiya muslim rule was there in india for 6 centuries and more, yes sometimes weaker and sometimes with great power, Don't know about marathas, but Turkish people weren't and aren't cowards, even rajputs who fought against muslim rulers, under the sun light they always got defeated by them so rather it was day or night doesn't matter, the fact is tham muslim rulers were always powerful and they had great war techniques.

[@love_Kholiya]

@@hammadraza9255 when you read the history then you always find akbar vs rajput. Delhi sultanat vs rajput, khilji vs rajput, ghouri vs rajput, arabs vs rajput, ghazni vs rajput, babur vs rajput but you did not interested in reading the history facts that after facing a defeat they stood up victoriously in every war

[@Sunil-zd4iv]

Aurangzeb may had more experience in warfare being a general but to become an emperor one needs qualities of inclusiveness, empathy & welfare orientation which he lacked totally.

[@faisalmirji7672]

Haha during aurangzebs time india was most richest and probably most powerful..A king like that still needs to learn how to learn the country?

[@pranayshome120]

​@@faisalmirji7672Banning Naurouz, persecuting Hindus and Sikhs, persecuting Shi'te Muslims, reimposing Jiziya, banning music and Jharokha Darshan portrays the bigoted nature of despicable Badshah Aurangazeb. With regard to wealth, it was concentrated in the hands of the emperor, his nobles and the aristocratic class, the toiling masses were impoverished. At least write with some semblance of sense.

[@IQRA718]

@@pranayshome120 he killed hindus definitely but to those who refused to accept his supremacy and suzerainty not on the basis of religion that you are trying to point out 😂😂😂.

[@pranayshome120]

@@IQRA718 Your perception is based on, I assume, from reading Audrey Truschke's book Aurangzeb- The Man and The Myth. But to be blunt, he did kill Hindus, the fact that he issued the creation of Fatwa e Alamgiri is a testimony to his orthodox nature and his vision of seeing India as an Islamic state. But remember he killed Hindus, Sikhs, Rajputs(selectively). He was a follower of Ibn Tahmiyya who proclaimed jihad against non-believers, so there is not an iota of doubt that he killed Hindus out of his iconoclastic mindset.

[@IQRA718]

@@pranayshome120 pushymitra shunga ,sasanka ,son of Ashoka killed Buddhist and destroyed buddhist monasteries. Aurangzeb was the most honest ruler that the country has ever seen. Aurangzeb forgave shivaji many times not only this he made him and his son mansabdar of the Mughal . But shivaji again betrayed him and tried to kill him . When he was summoned by Aurangzeb,shivaji literally accepted his mistake. Aurangabad could have killed shivaji but he never killed . Infact the infant son of shivaji after shivaji's demise was made mansabdar by Aurangzeb. If Aurangzeb had killed hindus how do you survive?? Now 110 crores hindu in Hindiu how ?

[@ravindraynk]

She is brutally wrong in stating Deccan was infertile and less revenues. Infact Deccan is the most richest plateau of subcontinent and Aurangzeb couldn't penetrate it as we kicked him black and blue. Till date south Indian states paying GOI highest revenue and other bigger states in North are surviving on this

[@Uzair823]

Are u a historian ?

[@vershilpatel3813]

Under him India accounted for 25% of world gdp and the biggest Indian empire in a thousand years

[@ayushdhingra855]

India gdp was 35 percent of total under maurya and was much bigger than Aurangzeb

[@justintime0167]

Imagine calling Hitler's actions circumstantial." Oh guys Hitler is a nice guy . He just wanted to reduce Germany's population that's why he gassed a few people and that's not his fault that they all were Jews" . " Aurangzeb wasn't a bad guy that was a staunch Islamist, he just jokingly asked the Hindus to pay jizya and forceful convert Hindus to muslims. It's not his fault all this happens . It was all circumstantial "

[@vishalsalve5641]

U know aurangabad is now sambhajinagar 😁

[@ameymhanera5333]

😌🚩

[@ayushdhingra855]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@biswanathmahapatra8441]

I dun wanna become a pearl ...i want to become the Ocean....The meaning of it lies in the Upanishads...which Dara sikoh studied a lot....the old lady seems to be naive to understand the deep truth behind this sentence

[@Uzair823]

HINDU BANNA ITNA ASAAN KAHA ,😑 APNI Hi BETI KE SAAT SAMBHOG KARNA PADTA HAI, 😐😐JAISE BRAHMA NE KIYA THA SARASWATI KE SAAT,,😑 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI APNI PATNI KO KISI KE PAAS BHEJNA.😑 JAISE RAAM NE BHEJA THA SITA KO 14 SAAL RAAVAN KE PAAS..😐😐 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI JISKA LING BADA DIKHA USKI POOJA KARNA SHURU . KISI KE LING KO CHUNA PADTA HAI.🥹 GAU MUTR PEEKAR.GOBAR KHANA PADTA HAI.😔 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI.ASHARAM BABA KE PAAS AURTO KO BHEJNA PADTA HAI😑 TEL LEKAR BAITHA HAI ASHARAM BABA. 😐😐 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI HAI KOI MUSLIM JO HINDU KI BARABARI KAR SAKE ?? Ram m🅰derchood 🐖💨🚩🕉 Hag Hag chakkadev 🐖💨🕉 Shiv ka kãtá lûllï 🖕🏾 Rãñdï sita 🐖💨🕉 Rāñdï durga 😂🐖💨🕉 Ràñdï saraswati 😂🐖💨🕉 Rãñdî Parvati 🤤🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾 Rãñdï kålî 🖕🏾🐖💨🕉 Rãñdî Làdhä 🐖💨🕉 Ràñdï rukmini 🖕🏾🐖💨🕉

[@effedupdoc]

Finally someone who has guts to say truth instead of spreading hate based propaganda. Kudos to you ma'am!

[@mallinathbasavarajasangi7420]

Those old lady calls Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj as Shivaray and Auragzeb as Badshah Aurangzeb.

[@burn_it4271]

Murad shown in video clip was not Mughal But Sultan of Ottoman empire Sultan murad

[@bds29]

Some one make her understand murid is a generic word ..which means someone truly devoted or madly love with someone..like today's Bhakts

[@theexplorers452]

She is in sacha pyar with aurangazeb♥️ .... Her way of telling brain washes people like Sanju Baba in sanju... Wat a pathetic pathological love fr a cruelity she got

[@Uzair823]

HINDU BANNA ITNA ASAAN KAHA ,😑 APNI Hi BETI KE SAAT SAMBHOG KARNA PADTA HAI, 😐😐JAISE BRAHMA NE KIYA THA SARASWATI KE SAAT,,😑 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI APNI PATNI KO KISI KE PAAS BHEJNA.😑 JAISE RAAM NE BHEJA THA SITA KO 14 SAAL RAAVAN KE PAAS..😐😐 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI JISKA LING BADA DIKHA USKI POOJA KARNA SHURU . KISI KE LING KO CHUNA PADTA HAI.🥹 GAU MUTR PEEKAR.GOBAR KHANA PADTA HAI.😔 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI.ASHARAM BABA KE PAAS AURTO KO BHEJNA PADTA HAI😑 TEL LEKAR BAITHA HAI ASHARAM BABA. 😐😐 TAB JAAKAR HINDU BANNA PADTA HAI HAI KOI MUSLIM JO HINDU KI BARABARI KAR SAKE ?? Ram m🅰derchood 🐖💨🚩🕉 Hag Hag chakkadev 🐖💨🕉 Shiv ka kãtá lûllï 🖕🏾 Rãñdï sita 🐖💨🕉 Rāñdï durga 😂🐖💨🕉 Ràñdï saraswati 😂🐖💨🕉 Rãñdî Parvati 🤤🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾 Rãñdï kålî 🖕🏾🐖💨🕉 Rãñdî Làdhä 🐖💨🕉 Ràñdï rukmini 🖕🏾🐖💨🕉

[@madhulinabhowmick4899]

Ma'am so well explained 🙏 Shah Jahan killed 36 of his brothers to ascend to the throne 😳 then why blame Aurangzeb 😊

[@prasoontyagi9871]

This podcast was such a BIG test for Ranveer and his team cuz the guest was stuttering and wasn't clear about the whole story at some patches yet these guys pulled the show off . Great work team !

[@anjanamenon286]

i feel Its other way around. I had a professor in my first year law school, who used to teach english constitutional history and initially we were not able to understand his class and one fine day we complained about his classes to one of our senior. she laughed at us and told us "He is one of the greatest professors in India and actually you guys have to level up your standards to understand his class". Similarly, this lady has high influx of information and knowledge, therefore she is going from one topic to another.

[@saibalsahoo8597]

Aurangzeb was the one of the cruel inhuman ever in human history.

[@GAL149]

As a person who loves history, the most fascinating thing about Aurangzeb is after ruling the empire for so many years he was just a poor person with very little money. And he donated all the money he made by copying alquran to the poor people.

[@MRnewgeneration09]

They are the people who justify and glorify History evils…… He killed brothers and father ….. circumstances…… he was not born cruel. Wah librandu gang wah

[@amirali57638]

That was just the tradition of turkic people they also did same in ottoman empire they would kill eveyone of there brothers to get the throne.

[@stxfdt1240]

@@amirali57638 chapri logic.

[@amirali57638]

@@stxfdt1240 I’m just saying that was normal back then so that doesn’t mean he was evil. he had to that otherwise he himself would get killed.

[@ayushdhingra855]

Apne dharm ka hain chuslim justify karte hain isiliye

[@rajeevganotra2823]

Ma'am it was beautifully narrated by you. I really wish and hope that you write a book on Marathas women, wish you good health and happiness 😊

[@neerajgautam8583]

Dara Shikoh was caught by MALIK JEEVAN , not by Mirza Raja Jay Singh. once Dara Shikoh helped him to save his life. He was given capital punishment by Badshah Shah Jahan but on the request of Dara Shikoh , Shah Jahan absolved him. So Dara Shikoh trusted him and reached there to take shelter. Dara Shikoh was in impression that he saved Malik Jeevan life. So in this tough situation he would also help him.But Malik Jeevan betrayed him.

[@dev1089]

DARA SHIKOH HAD 22 MULES LADDEN WITH GOLD COINS THAT MALIK JEEVAN COVETED AND HANDED DARA TO AURANGZEB FROM USA

[@shortsdelight]

🚩🚩Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ki jay 🚩🚩 Aurangjeb ko marathao ne Maharashtra ke bhoomi me Bhagya, Ghumaya, Aur aakahir kar Buddha Mulla Aurangjeb isi Maharashtra ke bhoomi me Gad diya phir dobara Delhi na Poch paya.. 🚩🚩

[@vbhoi88]

When you say No Religion is bad. You aren't brave enough. Your knowledge isn't conclusive.

[@clue8614]

Few days prior I was scrolling through some yt shorts and saw people being proud of Aurangzeb and saying that he did everything right just because he was muslim. It deeply questions my faith on humanity.

[@royn4088]

Yes, that’s unfortunate 😔

[@IndigenousVoices]

Aurangzeb was Perverse and Evil, Even by the Standards of Violent men of his time. He derived great Pleasure in Capital Punishments like Chopping off people slowly over 2 Weeks, Piece by Piece. He imprisoned his own Father and got his Brother assassinated. This is a Mentally Sicka and Evil Man, No doubt about it. Average Muslims' Knowledge today is restricted to Mughals and Taiban, They are the Standard of "Morality" for today;s Muslims because that is all they are taught. They are never taught about the Prophet, Great and Generous Muslim Kings like Akbar, Dara Shikon, Salahudeen etc , People who were admired as Good Humans, even by their Enemies.

[@305-r2k]

Aurangazeb Alemgir was best among Badshah like Ashoka, Chandragupta and Babur. Under his reign Hindustan was strong in Defense/Economy. Whatever says about him, he will be in our hearts. Do not judge by him by todays standard. He protected Hindustan against Persian invasion!

[@d45salonigaikwad82]

@@305-r2k this is so wrong. The way he tortured Chhatrapati Sambaji maharaj is so disgusting and terrifying to even imagine. He was just a Mughal emperor who wanted profit from India and convert people into Islam.

[@importantinfovideos824]

There is no compulsion in Islam. No one will do that. If you compel someone to accept Islam. Then it is nullified.

[@suvanshgupta8079]

People are always in denial mode and no one’s ever actually listening to anyone anymore! People usually click on to these videos with the mindset of arguing and not discussing! For the context- Mughals did nothing compared to what Britishers did to us which is more brutal and recent ! But no one’s doing anything about it, instead we’re having this WOW affection towards them, whenever we see one of them- except few people who talked about it! 🥶 I liked the video. Thanks for acknowledging us.

[@unknownwanderer04]

This is kind of true But there are something During Mughal regime non Muslims Are actually living like a 2nd class citizens During Aurangazeb If a non Muslim gets capital punishment And that non Muslim accept islam He is free

[@praveshdubey3991]

Chritians does not support brithishers but muslims support mugals, this is the reason

[@kumar646]

We need Praveen Mohan on this podcast

[@Rohan122]

😂😂😂

[@ChopChou]

Who is this lady? Excellently narrated.