Most Christians Don’t Know THIS About the Fossil Record

Most Christians don’t know THIS about the fossil record. In this presentation, Kevin Hadsall discusses how the fossil record and rock layers confirm the biblical account of Noah’s ark and flood.
Check out The Genesis Flood Revisited here: AnswersInGenesis.org/store/pr...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Martyn Iles, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Dr. Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@IAMhassentyou]

In Christianity, the Bible is considered the "Word of God," and there is much to find about this topic in scripture. The Bible is called the Word of God, meaning it can be considered a direct line of communication from the Lord, divinely inspired by the authors of the respective books. If the Bible is truly God’s Word, then we should cherish it, study it, obey it, and fully trust it. If the Bible is truly the Word of God, then it is the final authority for all matters of faith, practice, and morality. If the Bible is the Word of God, then to dismiss it is to dismiss God Himself.

[@wingednut2283]

"Is considered" but is it actually?

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@wingednut2283 yes, it is.

[@aalphaandomega3746]

Hi Amen and God bless

[@aalphaandomega3746]

I Love God and his word I Love with all my heart and soul . I Love you too . God is our father , creator , savior , brother and I am his vessel whom knows and feels his Love for me and us all .

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@aalphaandomega3746 hello! God bless you too

[@marilynpowell6881]

Amen, thank you for such an interesting and informative video. Its answered a lot of my questions. God bless xxx

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless you AIG 😊🙏✝️🕊️ thank you for all you do. You are a blessing to us

[@achildofGod36]

Praise the LORD! God's word is truth! Hallelujah! Proverbs 23:15-16 My son, if your heart is wise, then my heart will be glad indeed;16my inmost being will rejoice when your lips speak what is right. Jesus is coming soon.

[@HisWordisLife4U]

Yay! I am excited for that to happen.

[@marcgottlieb9579]

@@HisWordisLife4U Number one, there are two Elohim gods in Genesis.. They have names..Its good to know who is speaking..Two, he hasn't a clue the time period of the Great Flood that covered the Earth..Three, since Danial was told to close the book until the end of days when knowledge has increased, what have most Christians learned in 2500 years.? Not much due to the facts they don't seek the truth..The entities we call GOD that created the universe isn't in the Bible..The Elohim in Hebrew doesn't mean GOD, it means the powerful ones, the shining ones..Let's go to the Book of Revelation..What is the Dragon? I dare anyone that reads this to tell me the correct answer..What is the Heavenly Beast ? Same offer..The Bible is about ALIENS..

[@HisWordisLife4U]

@@marcgottlieb9579 No one cares who is talking. Evil is evil. Fallen angels are evil. There are no such thing as aliens they are fallen angels and demons. No one cares about your other theories. Buss off.

[@alphabeta1337]

Creation is fact, Evolution is myth

[@bernardclements]

Agreed 💯💯💯

[@all_bets_on_Ganesh]

A say it in capitals. It will be even more true.

[@DixieDee]

Amen. Sadly, many of these "fools" (as the bible even calls them) won't know this until Judgment Day, when ALL Truth is revealed. Oh well. It's THEIR soul. If they want to play "russian roulette" with it, that's on them!

[@billcook4768]

Do you realize the world can be created and that evolution is true?

[@rebekahorst]

@@billcook4768as in since the creation have living things evolved? Absolutely. Where creationists and evolutionists differ is about the very beginning and where we came from. We know that since God created everything, over time many plants and animals and even people have evolved. We just didn’t come from another species or anything and we never had tails, lol.

[@dennishagans6339]

Atheists have become much more vocal and militant in the last 20 years or so, I think it has to do with pride, they went to college, paid their dues got their degrees and in these last days their pride in these things has really increased. We are promoting the Biblical record and this record comes into direct conflict with their authority as educated degreed scientists, how dare we question them as they are authorities in these fields, this is really what this boils down to, their authority and education is being brough into question. Before we can even get to molecules to man evolution, we need to start with cosmic evolution, the big bang and then the solar nebula theory, in a big bang cosmology, the big bang is said to have only made three elements, Hydrogen, Helium, and a little bit of Lithium, for everything else you need stars to make the rest of the elements. Stars fuse Hydrogen producing Helium, and Helium into Carbon, an so on until Iron, once a star begins to make iron it is that stars death nell, all the rest of the elements after iron are said to be made in super nova explosions. In a big bang paradigm, stars are fundamental for life, as they created the elements needed for life, thus in a big bang paradigm explaining star formation is very important as we need stars to make the elements of life, even the noted scientist Dr. Carl Sagan said "we are star stuff" Fair Use Star Formation Neil DeGrasse Tyson said, "We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class, Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity The scary part is that if none of us knew in advance that stars exist, front line research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form." [Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2007, pg 107] Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries. New York: w.w. Norton and co. Eva Novotny said, “The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.” [Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279.] Martin Harwit said, “Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.” [Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405.] Martin Harwit said, “The universe we see when we look out to its furthest horizons contains a hundred billion galaxies. Each of these galaxies contains another hundred billion stars. That’s 1022 stars all told. The silent embarrassment of modern astrophysics is that we do not know how even a single one of these stars managed to form. There’s no lack of ideas, of course. We just can’t substantiate them.” [Martin Harwit, Book Review in Science, 7 Match 1996, p. 1201-2] Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu said, “The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.” [Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. The Formation of Sunllke Stars. Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564.] Ward D Thompson said, “The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.” [Ward D Thompson, Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81.] V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, “The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.” [V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114, 2001 September] Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell said, “Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” [Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, "A Matter of Timing" Scientif‌ic American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p.30] Having planets for life to form on is also paramount, so explaining their formation is also up there in importance. Fair Use Formation of Planets Martin Harwit said, “Once these planetesimals have been formed, further growth of planets "may" occur through their gravitational accretion into large bodies. Just how that takes place is not understood.” [Martin Harwit. Astrophysical Concepts. p. 553] J. Blum and G. Wurm said, “The formation of planetesimals, the kilometer-sized planetary precursors, is still a puzzling process.” [J. Blum and G. Wurm, The Growth Mechanisms of Macroscopic Bodies in Protoplanetary Disks, Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2008. 46:21-56] Jeff Cuzzi said, “How the first stage of this process, primary accretion, works is a fundamental unsolved problem of planetary science.” [Jeff Cuzzi, “Planets: the first movement," Nature 448, 1003 30 August 2007] John Chambers said, "Objects must have grown very rapidly from sub-metre-sized pebbles into 100-km-sized bodies, possibly in a single leap.” [John Chambers, “Planetary science: Archaeology of the asteroid belt," Nature 460. 963-964 20 August 2009] Anders Johansen said, “How this process continues from metre-sized boulders to kilometre-scale planetesimals is a major unsolved problem: boulders are expected to stick together poorly, and to spiral into the protostar in a few hundred orbits owing to a 'headwind' from the slower rotating gas.” [Anders Johansen et at, "Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent circumstellar disks," Nature Volume 448 1022-1025 30 August 2007] We cannot even get to molecules to man evolution because we have no stars nor planets for evolution to start, no stars no elements for life, no planets no place for life to start. However, the creation model works just fine.

[@richardgregory3684]

_However, the creation model works just fine_ "A magic wizard did it" always works fine if you are willing to belliever in magic wizards.

[@dennishagans6339]

@@richardgregory3684 so we are supposed to believe that evolution did it, when they can't even tell us how stars or planets can form? by the way, they do speculate on some civilizations out there as being 1 million years beyond us, at that level their tech would seem like magic to us and we would have about as much of a clue of their tech as a cave man would be of a modern cell phone. They have speculated about aliens in other universes that have the tech to create universes and maybe even created our universe, Did you ever watch Star Trek? What do you make of the Q continuum? or what about the episode of the one who identified himself as a "dowd" and some of the others they ran into like in TOS episode Arena where a very advance race the Matrons are able to do as they will and there is nothing the Enterprise nor the Gorn ship can do. in our science fiction we have godlike beings able to do things like the Q without the aid of any seeable technology, if you can enjoy it and even muse about it in science fiction then why such an aversion to any reality in this life? The Kardashev scale the original sale went as far as type 3 civilizations, others have expanded it last I saw to level 12.9 In some Kardashev Scale variants, a Type V is merely called "godlike" and is not defined at all, because it would be impossible for humans to imagine what one would actually be like. It could take 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to reach this rating!

[@wingednut2283]

Also we can just start with molecules to man. It is all peices to a larger puzzle and to say we do not know yet is okay.

[@stevenwhite8937]

Gas in space does not want to gravitationally collapse. Instead it wants to expand outwards…..

[@dennishagans6339]

@@richardgregory3684 Fair use Neil deGrasse Tyson explains how aliens could be so much smarter than us Neil Degrasse Tyson said, in this hypothesis: "Human is about 97% identical to chimpanzee. Our 3 years old is about as smart as adult chimpanzee. Imagine an alien species that is 3% on the other direction. Their 3 years old children would be smarter than Albert Einstein. “Oh look honey, these human discovered the theory of relativity. How cute, our little Timmy discovered that when he was three.” Why would such species bother contacting us? To them, we are nothing more than chimps on a zoo called Earth. 100,000 years ago, we are still living in savannah of africa. 10000 years ago, most human does not know how to write. 1000 years ago, most human does not know proper scientific methods. 100 years ago, human has just discovered cars, airplane, electricity Imagine what a species that has achieved all the above 4,000,000,000 years ago can do today? (age of Universe is 13,000,000,000)" oooo oooo super intelligent aliens ooo must be wizards

[@TJforChrist]

God bless you AIG !!! Stick with the authority of the word of God

[@markduell2468]

What if the Bible is wrong?

[@TJforChrist]

@@markduell2468 what if you're wrong? If I'm wrong I wasted my life. If you're wrong you wasted eternity and your life.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@TJforChrist What if Hindus are right? You would have wasted your life, eternity *AND* misinformed people while alive literally slowing down humanity's advancement.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@TJforChrist What if Hindus are right? You will have wasted eternity, your life as well as slowing down humanity's advancement.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

When god said the rainbow is his promise that he will never flood the earth again, he lied.

[@patriciaboggs8882]

Awesome Kevin! Your church family is excited to see how God is using you for His kingdom.

[@Kinglaugh451]

My wife would likely love a fossilized flower, since her ADHD keeps many of our plants from being alive.

[@graciegj63]

Lol 😅

[@graciegj63]

Have you tried a cactus?

[@MacehuaAtStonehaven]

😂

[@zerosteel0123]

😂

[@Kinglaugh451]

@@graciegj63 we have not yet.

[@paultharp4626]

Thankful for the work this ministry is doing

[@avafury4584]

Amen ✝️

[@jonathanrussell1140]

Spreading lies

[@thevulture5750]

Romans 1:20

[@farcovidiu3110]

@@thevulture5750 Yes, brother, people have no excuse, even if they were told evolution at all levels, even If they are bombarded with arguments from other evolutionists. We may try to tell them the thruth, through such videos and other means, and I am amazed by so much opposition ( maybe I shouldn' t), but at the end, they will not have any excuse because they saw clearly what is around them. God have mercy on them!

[@thevulture5750]

@@farcovidiu3110 have you seen how the KJV Bible has a mathematical structure?

[@farcovidiu3110]

@@thevulture5750 I did not think about that until now

[@shellygee137]

​@@thevulture5750 Please explain how the Buble has a mathematical structure and your source. I'm very interested!

[@davidboyer2290]

I came to the idea of a rapid disruption of Pangea when looking at underwater contours. Atlantic looks ripped apart quickly then slowed down for the mid-Atlantic Ridge to form. Pacific looks like a crumple zone on a car after impact. So maybe Pangea (one super continent, low hills at most)... The Ark (animals able to walk to Noah)... Earth ripped apart (tsunami flood) Tectonic mountain creation and mid Atlantic Ridge formation... Tectonic motion is rapid then slowed over time(migration of animals to "origin continents")... Look to the underwater contours and see if things don't match.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

You've heard of the Heat Problem, right?

[@davidboyer2290]

@@jonathanrussell1140 The faster than normal radioactive decay heat problem or another one?

[@fergusonhr]

Be careful what you say or you will get BURNED...​@@jonathanrussell1140

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

Ah, that's such a wonderful idea! I wonder why you haven't published it in an actual scientific paper...

[@solipsist3949]

Ask a geologist. They're the authorities and are happy to explain. If you want to know stuff, just take the right classes. It's not brain surgery, but it takes a bit more than wild guesswork on Google Earth.

[@user-pb8jl3te9g]

00:48 there is unknown amount of water on earth, there are under ground river basins that have never been explored. The Bible even mentions water springing up.

[@graciegj63]

That deep hole that was dug in Russia found water in there too.

[@mike62mcmanus]

They recently said there is more underground than above..

[@sliglusamelius8578]

There is water under the mantle of the earth that is three times the size of our surface oceans. Northwestern University reported that just a month ago.

[@Gek1177]

@@user-pb8jl3te9g that isn't actually water, is hydroxide ions bonded in mineral compounds, basically rocks.

[@zerosteel0123]

Heard the same! Interesting

[@TickedOffPriest]

Unless you understand the fall, you cannot understand Redemption.

[@alantasman8273]

Unless you understand man's sin nature and its result ...you cannot understand the need for a redeemer...that being Jesus the Christ.

[@TickedOffPriest]

@@alantasman8273 AMEN

[@HellNoMoreBiden]

​@@alantasman8273what I like to eat won't begin as a sacrifice.

[@profoundgreetingsfromneptune]

Excellent, thorough, faith-supporting presentation delivered with strength and grace.

[@avafury4584]

Amen 🙏🏿💗✝️

[@holidayrap]

Angels speak by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore, they speak the words of Christ. Wherefore, I said unto you, FEAST UPON THE WORDS OF CHRIST; for behold, the words of Christ will tell you all things what ye should do.

[@cosmic_king57]

Life cant come from none life

[@JB-yb4wn]

Yes it can, if you can read, try looking up abiogenesis.

[@luish1498]

the abiogenesis view proposes that the first life forms did indeed arise from non-living chemical precursors through natural processes, gradually increasing in complexity over time. This is the predominant scientific perspective, supported by evidence from fields like chemistry, biology, and evolutionary theory. Researchers have proposed various models for how this transition from non-life to life could have occurred, such as the RNA world hypothesis, the iron-sulfur world hypothesis, and others. These explore the potential chemical and environmental conditions that could have enabled the emergence of self-replicating, metabolizing entities.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

And yet here we are 😂😂😂

[@ChristisLord2023]

But none of them work. ​@@luish1498

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@JB-yb4wn yeah I did. scientists still cant do it.

[@IAMhassentyou]

Amen AIG 🙏

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

''Amen'' is right. These are religious rants that creationists pretend is science or ''debunking centuries of science'' without doing any science at all.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Troll, you argue with every creationists you can find just to argue but never wanna find the Truth. The Truth is in the LORD God Almighty aka Jesus Christ. I hope and pray your hardened heart becomes soft and you turn away from the wickedness and get right with Lord Jesus.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Also, God bless you sir/ma’am.

[@sherijobe9754]

You can also mention the little grand canyon here in Ga. and how quickly it formed.

[@mrscience1409]

Not really a canyon. It is a gully, only 150 ft deep and we know the source of its formation. Look up the Fish River Canyon in Africa. You guys are always arguing about the Grand Canyon like its the only canyon in the world. The Fish River Canyon's formation began 650 million year ago.

[@oluwadetanidowu533]

@@mrscience1409 Wow! 6 whole million years! And you know this how?

[@globalcoupledances]

@oluwadetanidowu533 - isotopes

[@oluwadetanidowu533]

@@globalcoupledances Terribly unreliable. Can also be contaminated by older or new substances. We can run everywhere deny or dismiss the possible existence of God, but at the end of the day, we have to admit that there is INTELLIGENT design in the universe. None of this could possibly have come into being because of some big "boom".

[@georgewade9748]

to connect more with July 4 ...just watched a movie about GW ...attaching the Hessian ...crossing the Delaware with his rag tag army...half of which had enlistments ending in a couple of weeks

[@user-dl3yv9ux8l]

So not everyone perished apparently aborigines say they have been on earth for 65000 years so how does that work

[@itsamystery5279]

Creationists will just ignore the scientific evidence like they always do.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Nor the nations of China, Egypt, India, Peru, other Middle Eastern people (zoroastrians) and so on....

[@dknockaert]

""" magic """

[@absolutelyfookinnobody2843]

Oh yea, let's just believe them out right without evidence. You are oozing desperation and you're a hypocrite

[@thehtehteotheithe]

clearly, they're wrong

[@jamescohn4268]

Beautiful how GOD closed the door of the Ark, and JESUS says HE stands at the door knocking and whoever lets HIM in…..

[@nickwilkin9845]

This is fantastic. Nice work, easy to understand and well put together presentation. Thank you and God bless you, as this does fill some gaps for me. Awesome.

[@samburns3329]

Nice work, easy to understand and well put together, and *completely wrong.*

[@mike62mcmanus]

It all sounds like fantasy, but I know it is not...

[@splinewalker214]

When the water bursted forth from the ground it’s talking about the springs all around the worlds started shooting water up out of them over flowing.

[@tone9358]

I find it interesting when a YEC takes a verse as allegorical instead of literal. Why are you so firm on other parts of the Bible are literal when you’re willing understand that other verses aren’t being literal? Especially when a literal interpretation clashes with what we understand about reality?

[@sctsou]

Thank you for your contribution in God's kingdom.

[@jackwatts8089]

I stumbled into this video. Praise God. I can understand this.❤

[@globalcoupledances]

Then there is no hope for you

[@JFootin]

There is no evidence of plant life and erosion within the layers, proving that it was all deposited in a very short period of time.

[@wingednut2283]

What does plant life turn into overtime do you know? Erosion is most definitely in rock layers pressure can make it look less so

[@apoliticalobserver2741]

Your are seriously misinformed. There is ample evidence of erosion between layers of sediment. For example the Temple Butte formation of the Grand Canyon lies between the Redwall and Muav limestones. The Temple Butte has numerous eroded out and infilled paleovalleys and paleochannels. The fossil record of land plants also goes back 425 MY, well before the dinosaurs evolved.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

Wow, you are so unbashedly confident about your claims that you didn't even bother fact-checking them. Look up "unconformities in geology". Erosional changes between strata absolutely exist. Fossilised plants also exist. Honestly, creationists are perhaps the most clueless yet conceited Science deniers.

[@vikingskuld]

​@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440why don't you look up fossilized soft tissue protiens and explain how they can last into deep time. People like you are so arrogant it amazes me. You don't know as much as you think.

[@spamm0145]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 HAHA, yeah, you stick with your matter without minds created all the fine tuning from the micro to the macro, the never observed matter moves toward life, the never observed information pops into existence without the source being a mind. Keep pretending that proteins fold themselves by chance despite odds greater than all the estimated molecules in the entire cosmos. Keep fooling yourself that matter without the ability to 'think' designed your brain that can comprehend abstract concepts despite the fact the molecules building your brain cannot understand them. Science concerning life is funded by people who have already decided evolution and the big bang are true, it is propped up by assumption, presupposition, data biased interpretation, and often fraudulent lies, you think this is science?

[@passionfly1]

Mr. Hadsall asking the question "where is the erosion?" is so key to understanding this. This is an extremely important question. Geologists are always talking about the deposition while dismissing the natural processes of erosion on this vast swaths of layering. This is so important!

[@jonathanrussell1140]

As all of this is bs, who cares? The actual answer is "the erosion is at the very top of the previous layer". How are you supposed to be able to detect what has been eroded away anyway?

[@jonathanrussell1140]

The erosion is the bit that is no longer there.... You're welcome

[@IamMarcRash]

This helps strengthen my faith. Thank You brother.

[@sspicer549]

Love this. Thanks for your work! From Virginia.

[@Thomas-bq4ed]

These videos make me a little sad. People would rather be ignorant then abandon their archaic beliefs. Peddling lies and making a living doing it. Using no science at all, rejecting all modern scientific research, and dating the food using strictly biblical text is insane.

[@oluwadetanidowu533]

Why is the idea of an all powerful God that created the universe impossible? What makes you right and creationists wrong? Funny thing is, if creationists are just mere kooks, at the end of the day they will just have a laugh. But if you are wrong and have repeatedly rejected God because your professor told you to, you will be lost eternally. Imagine believing that (or example) we can disassemble a tiny cessna, put the bolts and everything on top of a bomb in a pile, then detonate. And boom, we have a well assembled flyable plane. Not to mention the millions of lines of code in the avionics. Explosions do not create order, they create disorder! And that is a major issue for this Big Bang theory that evolutionists are forcing on everyone as the only fact. In fact, you need about 4 perfect big bangs each accomplishing a different stage in evolution (nothing to something antimatter to matter and then life). How did non living matter become living? Where did that life "energy" come from? My suggestion to you is that you humble yourself, because you do not know everything. Creationism is a THEORY just like Evolution. WE.DO.NOT.KNOW! Allow both both sides to put forward arguments and let people independently decide what makes better sense to them. Don't bully people by calling them archaic just because they do not hold the same beliefs as you.

[@alecj3454]

Great lecture Mr Hadsall. Thank you.

[@shellygee137]

@Kevin Hadsall: Would you please share the name of the book mentioned at the end of your message that helped you in having dialogues with humanists? Thank you.

[@creationmission7907]

The Ultimate Proof of Creation by Dr. Jason Lisle

[@edwardcook5282]

There is more water IN the earth than ON it .

[@mrscience1409]

Nope, 95% of all water is the oceans. All the fresh water including ground water, lakes, rivers, ice, water vapor and clouds make up less than 5% of the water on earth.

[@alantasman8273]

@@mrscience1409 Nope...look up vast water reservoirs under the continents...there are two to three times as much water as in the world surface oceans.

[@mrscience1409]

@@alantasman8273 you misunderstood the findings. It’s not liquid water. It’s hydroxide radicals trapped in crystals.

[@alantasman8273]

@@mrscience1409 Tell that to those who published the result ...Water whether it is liquid, and ice or a gas is still water. Water Dampness is evidence of water.

[@mrscience1409]

@@alantasman8273 Except it is not damp. Water is HOH, a hydrogen molecule H+ attached to a hydroxide radical OH-. Water subducted into the earths mantle is torn apart by the extreme heat and pressure into its constituent parts. The OH radicals are trap in a crystal called ringwoodite. There is no dampness, because there is no water. Simply rock with the remains of water. It is not gas, liquid or even plasma. This is very easy to verify. Just research it. Don't listen to apologist who have an agenda and use a selective interpretation of science.

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

The flood was a natural and supernatural event. Humanity would not have been able to survive if God had not intervened. The Flood of Noah’s day (2348 BC) was a year-long global catastrophe that destroyed the pre-Flood world, reshaped the continents, buried billions of creatures, and laid down the rock layers. It was God’s judgment on man’s wickedness and only eight righteous people, and representatives of every kind of land animal, were spared aboard the Ark.

[@mrdoginabog5499]

What about bristlecone pines?

[@luish1498]

apperently egiptians were building pyramids under water!! LOL

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

@@mrdoginabog5499 read: Biblical Chronology and the 8,000-Year-Long Bristlecone Pine Tree-Ring Chronology (AIG)

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

read: Biblical Chronology and the 8,000-Year-Long Bristlecone Pine Tree-Ring Chronology Answers in Genesis

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

Biblical Chronology and the 8,000-Year-Long Bristlecone Pine Tree-Ring Chronology

[@bethvonbuchwald1023]

Thank you for clear explanation of scientific issues. My one question - would there also be human fossils?

[@globalcoupledances]

Wikipedia "List of human evolution fossils"

[@creationmission7907]

Search "Where are all the human fossils" on the Answers in Genesis website and you will find several articles on that topic

[@user-fv5ms4sz8e]

I know that the huge T Rex skull on display in Corpus Christi museum was plastic and after it was discovered, they removed it and replaced it with pirate shipwreck artifacts.

[@kattykitters5310]

Such fossils are extremely rare and extremely valuable, worth several million dollars. It's common practice in museums to display replicas and keep the valuable originals safe under lock and key.

[@thesword-sapdog322]

You realise 😈, this is going to affect the B🤑ttom line?

[@Woopor]

You mean the mega churches who profit off of manipulating people’s emotions, right?

[@johnlord8337]

The biblical Old Testament, using the Hebrew lunar calendar of 28 day months (13 months/year + 4-5 days tossed away), the biblical Flood happened (with restored timeline, Abraham's life, and Moses and the true date of the Exodus 1207/1206 BCE), in ~1987 BCE.

[@KenJackson_US]

So is there a separate timeline for the Bible and for the secular history of Sumer, Akkad, Assyria, Babylon and Egypt? Hardly. All those secular empires descended from Noah. God preserved the original timeline in Genesis 11 of the Greek Septuagint. The flood happened at least 5000 years ago, maybe 3298 BC.

[@johnlord8337]

​@@KenJackson_US You are not listening. There is absolute correlated history (and biblical) timelines from ~1187 BCE downwards from Egypt times. Backwards, it is proven that the Exodus happened 207/1206 BCE. Horemheb "A" the (said) pharoah of the Exodus, with sibling brother Merneptah, were the grandsons of Ramses II the Great. There are granite pillars on both sides of the Red Sea, where it is (said) the Exodus took place. Also the black obelisk of Merneptah (actually Horemheb "A") states that they were glad to get rid of the Israelites. It is Horemheb "A" father of the only son Horemheb "B" who died in the Exodus. All of this is written up in Ramses II the Greats tomb, with a painted genealogy on the wall. Historians and theologians have schmucked the 18th and 19th dynasties as successive, WHEN THEY WERE COLLATERAL (with the Tuthmose and Amenhoteps of the Nile Delta). The actuala enslavement (minimal wage jobs and construction industry) was onlyi 89-92 years in length. The book of Exodus and Leviticus mentions the parentage AND AGES of Moses' fathers. Moses was born during this time, 1287/1286 BCE. It is known history that the Nile Delta was taken back from the Sea Peoples, Hyksos (Eastern Hebrew) and Habiru (Abraham's Western Hebrew) in 1295, 1292 BCE. There was NO 400 years enslavement !!! Dating all this back, Abraham was given a prophecy at AGE 100 (1587/1586 BCE) about his descendants. Abraham was born in Western Europe 1687/1686 BCE. From there it can be traced that Noah, his 3 sons ages, the Flood happened ~1987 BCE. Stop the stoopid statements, and listen up ... I'm trying to teach you something. Correct history and correct biblical timeline. This also massively rewrites and corrects wrongful Egyptian history, dynasties, and timelines of ancientness. Also the Israelites came from Canaan, down into the Nile Delta, under Joseph, and lived in the eastern Nile Delta of the land of Goshen. It was the Tribe of Judah and Tribe of Levi who intermarried with the nobility and royalty of these 2 Egyptian dynasties. As such, the Tribe of Judah lineage has namesaked proofs. Judah had, by Thamar, sons Zara (Osiris) and Pharez (Horus). Pharez had son Hezron (Osirion). Hezron marries with the Theban Egyptian Ramesside dymasty, and has namesaked son Ram (Ramesses). Ram marries with the Nile Delta Egyptian Amenhotep dynasty, and has namesaked son Amminidab (Amenhotep). Amenhotep marries again into the Nile Delta Amenhotep IV (Anhkenaton) family, having son Exodus Prince "Nashon" of Judah being the Hebrew namesaked after his mother "Asenenaton", the daughter of Tutanhkamon. Grecian-Egyptian historian Manetho (Amenhotep) records that the Zara-ites left the Nile Delta 150 years before the Exodus (1207/1206 BCE) ... 1357/1356 BCE. Some 60-65 years before the Nile Delta enslavement by the Tutmose and Amenhotep dynasty. They scattered and became the new nations of the Mediterranean, Scandinavia, and Europe. Heman (King Minos of Knossos Greece, Linear B Hebrew put onto the ol Minoan Linear A language), Dara (Darius, Thor of Germany), Ethan (Odin of Scandinavia), Gymry (Cymry of Cimmerians, Gomers of Russia and Central Arab Republics region, and the Cymry of Wales, proto-British), ... and Chalchol (Kulkul Khan, Chalchol the Great OF MAYAN AMERICAN fame). Trans-Atlantic sailing between Old and New Worlds 1300s BCE and earlier ! So stop the stoopid talk, with little to talk about, and no research to back up your lip flapping ... whether a human or AI troll.

[@eneeland]

Why are you using BCE? How about BC? You know, Before Christ.

[@johnlord8337]

Because I am of the original and Celtic church, when the first community were called "christians," ... 300 years older than the Pharisee catholic church and its theology and words. It - IS - BCE Before Christian Era, and CE Christian Era. And we look to the original apostles and leadership of the Yehidah community ... with the Gospels and Letters of James, John, and Peter (Simeon Acyph, Cephas), and less-so to the Gentile (and Zara-ite expats and Gentiles of Europe and the Mideast) Pauline letters.

[@rustysm8080]

​@@johnlord8337 That isn't a common acronym of BCE. Almost always, it means Before the Common Era... A secular deliberate removal of Christ.

[@GeraldAlpinePerry]

Another consideration is if millions of years was spent making fossils all over the earth, there should be millions of years of humanity within the same remains. We have found a few, but some of the people didn't survive the flood and human population only expanded in the last century. The Earth is most likely younger than most people think.

[@richardgregory3684]

_Another consideration is if millions of years was spent making fossils all over the earth, there should be millions of years of humanity within the same remains_ No, because humans - homo sapiens - is not millions of years old. Moreover, for most our our known evolutionary history, our numbers were very small, and geographically limitted. Which is why human fosisls are very rare. And made even rarer by humans engaging in burial rituals. Even the earliest humans did not tend to leave dead peopel wherever they died.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

What are you even talking about? Lol please elaborate on this millions of years of humans if millions of years of animals.....b does not equal a. So I'm genuinely curious.

[@burnttoast2790]

The problem with that line of thought is thinking that our species has actually been around for that long. We haven't. Anatomically-modern _Homo sapiens_ have only existed for 300,000 years, and _H. sapiens_ in general not much longer. Humans as a specific evolutionary lineage, ie. genus _Homo,_ have been around for a little under 3 million years. Everything beyond that has been human ancestors that don't actually qualify as humans (whether that be other hominids, primates, mammals, synapsids, tetrapods, vertebrates, animals, eukaryotes, or cellular life).

[@globalcoupledances]

For me the first human was the brother/sister of the first chimp 7 million years ago. So that includes Sahelanthropus, Orrorin, Ardipithecus, Australopithecus. Confirmed by YEC Robert Carter and Don Batten with their claim of 60-100 mutations per generation

[@johns_myth]

At a quick glance, old earth theory made sense to me because of the insinuation that God made Adam as an adult, so perhaps He made an adult Earth. However, the beautiful conclusion to the presentation shows the implications of the theory's logic in undermining the consequences of sin and Christ's death. I have now changed my mind, and with good reason, and with plenty of evidence. "Why does it matter?" is always the question I get when I ask other believers, and I couldn't explain why, but I knew it did. Now I know. Thank you for the presentation.

[@bigpounder311]

Brilliant! Awesome can’t wait to hear you in person!

[@SavedbyGraceAlone1962]

The Fossil Record - powerful evidence of a world wide flood.

[@itsamystery5279]

We have geologic evidence of thousands of local flood and thousands of sediment depositions by oceans and seas over the last 500 million years. We have zero evidence all the sediments found on the Earth were all deposited at the same time by the same event only 4400 years ago.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

The fossil record: a misrepresented and deceptively portrayed record that actually articulates how millions of years shaped the Earth and its organisms.

[@epicofgilgamesh9964]

😂 No, no it's not.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

The Fossil Record - powerful evidence of evolution. Not ever did it support a hilarious worldwide flood of fairy tales. Stop trying to shove your religious beliefs into science.

[@SavedbyGraceAlone1962]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Please point out where I mentioned religion. I'll wait.... And while you're at it, point out your evidence that a world wide flood is a fairy tale, made up for children's imaginations and entertainment. I'll wait for that too.....

[@yorotirb3941]

There is a part in the bible that says the earth was covered with like a mist or humid layer in Noahs days and this is what God rained down on earth. When God made the rainbow as his covenant that is what made it so special because mankind had never seen this before the flood. Just my op.

[@tone9358]

verse?

[@jonathanrussell1140]

God lied about the rainbow. It happens every single time sunlight refracts through raindrops since the dawn of time.

[@alantasman8273]

Genesis 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. This was probably from vast underground reservoirs that broke up at the time of the flood. These waters had already been peculating through under tremendous pressures from below causing the mist or water vapor upon the land.

[@VincentConard]

I get so weary of Christian apologists who do NOT hold to young earth creationism. There are too many otherwise well-educated Christian scholars who feel they MUST adhere to the “science” that the creation is millions/billions of years old. Thank you for THIS clear presentation. My prayer is that Christians who mock YEC will reconsider and repent. Continued blessings to you and your ministry.

[@Th69571]

The Earth is billions of years old.

[@richardgregory3684]

Yeah no doubt you'd have been one of the Inquisition who voted to convict Galileo for the heretical idea that the earth goes around the sun, not the other way around.

[@globalcoupledances]

Galileo has shown that the Bible is not accurate

[@Gek1177]

@@VincentConard the problem with AiG apologists is they'd rather lje about science than just admit they believe in a miracle.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

You are weary of intellectually honest christians who are capable of accepting facts and fitting them around their religious beliefs?

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

Psalm 100 Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs. Know that the LORD is God. It is he who made us, and we are his ; we are his people, the sheep of his pasture. Enter his gates with thanksgiving and his courts with praise; give thanks to him and praise his name.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

Amen

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

@@vernoncleveland6806 amen!

[@TheresaWenzel-re7ed]

Dear , Answers in Genesis here is your next step there are to many people who have been gone astray . 😢 They do not know who Jesus is and what he looks like. And do not know what the angels and the animals in the Bible look like .

[@thehtehteotheithe]

"we can handwave that by saying God can make as much water as He sees fit" or we could acknowledge that the mountains were lower and the oceans shallower back then, and the flood broke pangea, made the tall mountains when the continental plates crashed into each other, and made the oceans as deep as they are when the floodwaters receded.

[@richardgregory3684]

_or we could acknowledge that the mountains were lower and the oceans shallower back then_ And your evidence for this is....? _ and the flood broke pangea, made the tall mountains when the continental plates crashed into each other, and made the oceans as deep as they are when the floodwaters receded_ Pangea was 175,000,000 years ago. Any event that could cause the separation of continent, raise mountains and deepend the oceans in less than a year would liberate so much energy as to boil the oceans, blow the atmosphere off earth, and turn what was left into molten rock. Certainly more than enough to destroy a floating wooden magic zoo.

[@captivedesk3168]

The engineers told Ham his boat would never float so rather than floating it on the ohio river giving rides, its a building mock up. If ham really thought it would float, float it somewhere, a sinking ark though doesn't make Ham money

[@jonathanrussell1140]

😂😂 just like the schooner Wyoming...

[@jaymiller9254]

No. Reality is the flood.

[@wingednut2283]

Said no educated person ever

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@wingednut2283 there are plenty of educated Christians. Including Christians who are YEC.

[@Gek1177]

​@@zerosteel0123plenty, maybe, but statistically speaking creationists are the least educated religious demographic in the West. And the "experts" either never publish any work in their field or they publish work that has nothing to do with YEC.

[@CENTURION737]

Just like the religion of evolution is nothing more than SpongeBob imagination

[@Gek1177]

@@zerosteel0123 statistically not that many though.

[@galenhaugh3158]

The Bible is a woefully inadequate geology textbook. And yes, I'm very familiar with the Bible and hundreds of geology textbooks.

[@Littleking1985]

The heat problem the evolution believers always bring up is so easy to explain. When they tested air bubbles in amber it shows the atmosphere had double the pressure. When air expanes it causes cooling like spraying an arousal canister. This expansion of the atmosphere would absorb this heat. Also they calculate the heat by using a 40 day rain cycle that covered mount everest when the Bible clearly says the flood came from the fountains of the deep bursting forth and that the mountains formed during the end of the flood from the waters being ejected from under the earth causing voids which would collapse in on themselves causing an up lift in some places..walt browns hydroplate theory explains this very well and he is a reliable source having a phd and working for the military and if you disagree with him then you hate our military 😊

[@passionfly1]

I apprecaite this video. Thank you for this rational explanation. SO glad he mentioned the deposition of the Mount Saint Helens eruption in 1980 too. I saw it happen live on TV when I was a boy and many of the hills surrounding that mountain never existed. That was my first introduction to days instead of millions of years occurrence. The thin lamina shown @22:31 is very revealing of the strata you see at the Grand Canyon (which I also visited).

[@zerosteel0123]

The flood is the best explanation by far. That's when God ripped apart the continents.

[@Th69571]

The flood as described by the bible didn't happen. There was a flood but not as grand as the one in the book.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

It's not. It's the fantasy you really want to be true, despite any logical thinking tearing it apart in seconds.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

8 different scientific disciplines say you're wrong. Check out Aron Ra's series of 8 videos on this. Yes, that's right, Aron Ra

[@zerosteel0123]

@@Th69571 not according to God's word and it is HIS word that we will trust in.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience the only fantasy here is the idea that there is no God and He cannot do what is deemed to be possible by mere men.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

I know.....thanks to AIG!

[@Yamyatos]

You think you know, and are wrong, thanks to channels like AIG!

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@Yamyatos anything that comes against God will be proven to be a lie. Just like evolution.

[@joaniemcguire1856]

Praise God from whom all blessings flow. Praise Him all creatures here below. Praise Him above ye heavenly hosts. Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. In Jesus' Name Amen. Thanks for this amazing video. God bless you and your sweet family and all who helped you.

[@stillraven9415]

Creationist believe sin made death come into the world. Evaluation makes death create life.

[@Sl15555]

What died for the very 1st life then?

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Wow what a horrendous, egregiously dishonest misrepresentation of abiogenesis? Evolution? Both? Somehow you conflate the 2, and get the definitions of both so embarrassingly wrong.....geeeez.

[@garyseven2308]

I love how scientists state the temperature of the Earth 120,000 years ago, when there were no temperature measuring devices 120,000 years ago. ;)

[@luish1498]

How do we know the temperature 120000 years ago? For the pre historical record measurements of natural thermometer records are used. These natural thermometers include ice cores, tree rings, speleothems, lake sediments, ocean sediments and so on.

[@mixmaster00myke]

​@luish1498 what are your thoughts on the accuracy of carbon dating

[@TJforChrist]

​@@luish1498 in other words, you guess

[@markduell2468]

@@mixmaster00myke Carbon dating isn't used when dating the age of the earth.

[@lawrencegreen8952]

Yes, there were ways to measure the temperature. Do the work and find out how, lazy brain.

[@uconnstudentninja]

Citation needed for 44:46 - 45:01

[@globalcoupledances]

I doubt there are citations of his claims

[@samburns3329]

The guy is not telling the truth. We don't find any extant species buried with dinosaurs. We find the *distant ancestors* of some mammals, some birds, some insects fossilized along with dinosaurs.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@samburns3329 unclear why your comment is hidden. Hope my thumbs up reverts it

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

​@samburns3329 there's a guy named Carl Werner that states this nonsense too in his presentation on the STANDING FOR TRUTH channel....sheer rediculous

[@thomasarnold5127]

Calculate the flood not by lineage but by the death of Methusala. The name Methusala means "whos death will bring destruction " This name is the reason behind Methusala having a long life. He was protected and cared for very well throughout his lifetime. Upon Methusalas death the flood began.

[@daviddroescher]

Back in the 90's milford lake in Kansas had to do an emergency water release to prevent a catastrophic dam over toping . A few days later 168' of hard bedrock was eroded exposing several dinosaur skeletons. Now conciter the Grand Canyon. Soft sandy fresh sediments getting hit with much more water

[@miscamisca6775]

Let us consider that for a moment, if it really was this deep time with slow evolutionary development, then would we not expect to find billions of dead things in different layers of different types? And that is exactly what we find in the fossil record.

[@alantasman8273]

Billions of dead things found in strata laid down quickly during a global flood is exactly what we see in nature. The global catastrophe even moved land masses rapidly causing collisions resulting mountain chains around the world being lifted up. Even marine fossils are found at the summit of Mt Everest which was raised up during a land mass collision with what is now the Asian continent. These land mass collisions caused rapid rises mountain elevations ...the Himalayas were not raised up very slowly over millions of years.

[@miscamisca6775]

@@alantasman8273 "The global catastrophe even moved land masses rapidly causing collisions resulting mountain chains around the world being lifted up." It did? That must have created enormous amount of heat, where did all that heat go during that year? " Even marine fossils are found at the summit of Mt Everest" Yes, that is becaosue Everest is made of sedimentary rock. "These land mass collisions caused rapid rises mountain elevations ...the Himalayas were not raised up very slowly over millions of years." Himalayas are still rising, but where did all that heat go ?

[@Rev14v7]

We would see more transitional forms, like a continuum really, instead of distinct types of creatures that are fully formed and generally very much like what we see today. There should be animals with half legs, half eyes, and many other useless parts. They have never been found. And without catastrophes on Noah's Flood scale, no, we wouldn't see the layers we see that span continents.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​@@alantasman8273 the Himalayas *were* raised up slowly over millions of years. The Chinese have a flood myth in which people were able to escape to higher ground. Please stop this nonsense.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​@@Rev14v7do you actually know anything about evolution and the fossil record? We have evidence of exactly what you say has never been found.

[@poliincredible770]

It all makes sense when you start with God's word. It all gets ridiculous when you start with darwin's presumptions.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Darwin was one man, that made an incredible observation. From that a hypothesis was formed about natural selection. This was/is observed every day in nature. The most fit for their environment survive to reproduce, those that are less fit die or fail to reproduce. If you think that is where evolution started and stopped I have some bad news for you.....we have learned so much more in the 150 years since Darwins observation. The best part, Darwin was the only one observing this process at the same time. Alfred Russel Wallace was separately observing natural selection at work. 2 completely isolated observers finding the exact same process in nature.....that's a pretty firm foundation to build from.

[@katamas832]

It doesn't make sense to you because you don't understand Evolution, plain and simple.

[@poliincredible770]

@@Johnny_Eh-theist you said 2 people observed natural selection and that is a firm foundation??? 2 observers is far from solid, and no they didn't observe it: Nature doesn't have a mind, a body, or anything required to make selections. The term "natural selection is a metaphorical anthropomorphic term. What we observe is genetic information causing life forms to reproduce offspring of the same taxonomic family as the previous generation, which is what Genesis 1 says God designed to happen.

[@poliincredible770]

@@katamas832 I noticed you didn't give any examples of observed transitions.

[@poliincredible770]

@@Johnny_Eh-theist we've seen trillions of fly births since darwin published his hypothesis and every one of them has resulted in more flies. That's a pretty firm foundation to know his presumptions were ridiculous.

[@Paralititan]

the amount of energy released if you would break up Triassic Pangea into the Cretaceous/modern tectonic setting in say a single year would be so large that it would melt the surface of the earth and evaporate the entire water body.. yeah sounds plausible dude 😂

[@paulpatriot1776]

Can someone answer this for me please? If we find so many fossils of creatures, then why don’t we find millions of human fossils ( the population of humans on earth that were killed in the flood)?

[@thevulture5750]

The KJV Bible is mathematically encoded.

[@St-uv5bc]

No, its not. Pay attention. Hollywood is not the place you should be going to as a resource for understanding the Bible.

[@JesusSavesRepent]

@@St-uv5bcthere are whole videos on KZbin even explaining how the KJV is mathematically encoded. Look up Robert Breaker.

[@Fire_Eider]

48:17 "95% of the fossil record is of marine creatures, and they are found throughout most of the strata." Except anomalocaris, trilobites, etc., who all lived and died out before the dinosaurs. Those marine creatures aren't mixed with the dinosaurs, nor are they found in layers dated at the same time or after the Mesozoic (the dinosaur era). And where are the human fossils? Those don't show up until long *after* the dinosaurs? You're trying to say every human who lived during the flood somehow managed to avoid getting fossilized until after the last dinosaur got buried? Same situation with whales and dolphins- they don't appear in the fossil record until long after dinosaurs stopped appearing. Edit to add: and that's just marine creatures. Sabertooth cats, mammoths, rhinos, etc. don't appear until after, either.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

Mammals are found with dinosaur fossils, contrary to what you probably learned. Marine fossils are found with dinosaur fossils.

[@Fire_Eider]

@@sliglusamelius8578 Mammalians first appeared in the Triassic, yes. Cats? Capybara? Elephants? Mammals that we know today? Nope, nope, nope, and more nope. And what about BEFORE the dinosaurs? In the Permian and Carboniferous there were neither mammals nor dinos. Why are they all missing, despite their being anomalocaris, dimetrodon, gorgonopsids, and arthropleura? And those don't show up with the dinos Marine fossils being found with dino fossils isn't the issue- it's that they're ONLY FOUND within a short period, then you find other species. THAT is the ordering problem. Where are the humans that died early in the flood? Why aren't their fossils alongside the trilobites and dimetrodons?

[@cooperc4060]

​@@Fire_EiderWhy even waste your energy. These people have no clue.

[@Fire_Eider]

@@cooperc4060 for the miniscule chance of *giving someone a clue*. Foolish hope? Most likely. But maybe, just maybe, it can put a question in someone's mind, and then another helpful person can help that person learn more.

[@cooperc4060]

@@Fire_Eider Ya I think foolish hope. The things this speaker was saying is insane. I just go to these videos for the comical value now. I have friend who made lots of money age dating rocks simply by using index fossils for Shell oil company. If he ever came back and said the strata was less than 6000 years old he would lose his job. All the technology surrounding these peoples lives, from simply driving a car to medicine and DNA goes against pretty much everything this guy said.

[@ryanehlis426]

There is water up there, look 👀 up, it’s blue!

[@user-ho1tf4rp8f]

But if it was a global flood, wouldnt there just be one rock layer? All rock layers would be mixed.

[@randykuhns4515]

Also,.. that the ark was sealed inside and out with pitch made it unaffected by whatever did take place during the flood,.. it is logical to think that great rafts of flotsam were floating during the flood, thus some life may have potentially been able to ride out the flood ,thus not die, except that I think that when the flooding was taking place it so completely destroyed the old earth that even the atmosphere for a time was void of oxygen which might be why the bible explicitly pointed out all air breathing animals, and never spoke of fish,.. thus why the ark was sealed with pitch inside and out,.... and to seal the door,... God shut it,...

[@davidgardner863]

That pitch wouldn’t help much against super heated water and anything in or on the water would be instantly steam cooked.

[@randykuhns4515]

@@davidgardner863 That's presuming that it even got hot as part of the destruction, but what if God literally used all the oxygen turning it into to water,... and not so much for water, but so no air breathers COULD survive? just speculation for sure, but the Bible did explicitly point out al air breathing animals, and it also pointed out about the pitch inside and out, which could have only been to waterproof it, but also possible to seal off the life inside the ark from what was going to take place outside other than the flood,..

[@davidgardner863]

@@randykuhns4515 , Do you know that water is composed of oxygen and hydrogen? Do you know that all animal life in the oceans extract oxygen from the water through gills or other means? Where do think Moses got tens of thousands of gallons of pitch? At the local Home Depot? Even the guy in this video admitted the ocean got hot but that would kill the krill, plankton, and much of sea life starting at the bottom of the food chain, only he grossly underestimated the amount of heat produced. His whole scenario is utter nonsense.

[@captivedesk3168]

You tossed logic in the trash when you embrace a flood that never happened and a magic zoo boat

[@randykuhns4515]

@@captivedesk3168 And you lost what little bit of being taking serious by your clownish reply, Clown,... now go outside and play, while grown ups talk,..

[@asonei3531]

Radiometric dating shows that the earth is a few billion years old. By making the claim that it is a few thousand years old, you already discredit yourself. Why can anyone believe the rest that you're saying?

[@mikevangelderen9402]

Who says it's really that old? How do you know carbon dating is accurate? Because atheist scientists say so?

[@user-tt9jz5ym8h]

Could be a change in the value of the velocity of light. That would change the rate of radioactive decay. The first light in the universe didn't come from stars. It predates atoms. It appeared at about 300K years after the big bang, and stars didn't form until about 500 million years. The first light appeared at all places in the universe at approximately the same time. This is inferred by the uniformity in the CMB.

[@globalcoupledances]

@mikevangelderen9402 - Not with carbon dating, but with Uranium-Lead dating

[@KenJackson_US]

You discredit yourself by not thinking through those dating techniques. They depend on the *assumption* of starting conditions, that the starting daughter elements didn't exist or were known. No one recorded those conditions. They can only be guessed. But you believe it as gospel truth.

[@globalcoupledances]

@KenJackson_US - Zirconium crystal can not form if there is lead. Lava can not contain Argon

[@PullipKisses]

I'd love it if my husband gave me a fossilized flower.

[@atmospheres11]

Brilliant

[@MaynardState]

Where is all of this technical information in the Bible? I assume it's hidden there somewhere since no one was alive to observe the drift.

[@bernardclements]

Amen 🙏🙏🙏 Primordial Soup 🍲 - What a joke 💯💯💯

[@katamas832]

You haven't even the slightest clue about Abiogenesis.

[@HS-zk5nn]

exactly

[@Gek1177]

Do you not believe that the Ancient Earth had oceans?

[@crusader333ad]

@@katamas832-abiogenesis is easily disproven. I’ll change my mind if you can tell me just how one tiny strand of a glucose polymer SPONTANEOUSLY formed in a prebiotic earth. Can you do it??

[@katamas832]

@@crusader333ad Why glucose? There are several types of sugars already explained by Abiogenesis. It's funny how ya'll always do this "do this ONE SPECIFIC THING and then I'll believe!" like this one experiment proves anything beyond glucose being able to form naturally. I am certain, that you would not change your mind.

[@marceloribeirosimoes8959]

Now, talking about this video and all other videos from AiG, they are too much longer than they could be... C'MON GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are not all Bill Gates' sons who have no need to work for money and study or anything else...

[@solobusiness4320]

Him trying to explain always billions of years of fossils that we can literally see and date. By saying it all happened in one year is just absurd this guy has no clue what he’s talking about

[@davidgardner863]

He’s just reading out of Ken Ham’s playbook.

[@cameronosborne7405]

How are the fossils dated, what is the instrument?

[@globalcoupledances]

@cameronosborne7405 - fossils dated with index fossils

[@davidgardner863]

@@spamm0145 , Radiometric dating. But you will say it’s not reliable because the samples collected by creationists and not sent to the proper labs give wildly different results.

[@farcovidiu3110]

Seems You did not listen at all. He just brought common sense geologic arguments for what he said. Either You have an equally documented reply, or otherwise please do not make statements without a rational basis and with no basis in reality. God bless you.

[@SoulCrapper]

Are there mass human fossil graves too? More importantly are they mixed with creatures that they shouldnt be mixed with according to evolutionist theory?

[@maryjacobs5920]

Too week of bones and God wanted them gone

[@SoulCrapper]

@@maryjacobs5920 The man just talked about how they have fossilized flowers, jellyfish, insects, and invertebrates. So the relative density of our bones should be negligible.

[@KenJackson_US]

Humans had the good sense to flee to higher ground early, and fill whatever boats they had with people. So they tended to not get buried. Besides, if mass human fossil graves are found, paleontologists would declare them to have died within recorded history regardless of circumstances.

[@spamm0145]

@@KenJackson_US 100% correct, most folk can't process beyond their bias confirmation for a paradigm they have decided is true.

[@tone9358]

@@KenJackson_US That doesn't work when you account for other animals such any modern mammal not being found below the cretaceous layers.

[@generalpatton838]

You should watch Rod Meldrom

[@williamnantz571]

He hasn’t mentioned the firmament, water vapor layer that is mentioned in genesis, the waters above the heavens that fell to earth

[@Woopor]

0:14 it always cracks me up how Apologists talks about how scientists can’t be correct because they weren’t there to witness the events 66 Million years ago, and they subsequently begin talking about a book whose events ALSO weren’t witnessed by anyone alive today, and who’s authors aren’t even entirely known at that

[@joeythebushkangaroo1]

Some 40 writers of the 66 books in the Holy Scriptures are all known,we know who they are,some small amount of verses are unsure as to which writer wrote which verses. That's all. All were led along by Gods Holy Spirit,his invisible force or power, to write down his words for all mankind to read over 16 centuries. Many were unknown to each other & from different regions & countries. There is only one Author,God Almighty. The writers were used as a secretary dictates for a Boss. When the letter is received,all understand the letter is not from the secretary, but it's from the Boss. It has been preserved even when enemies burnt people at the stake for having or translating a Bible. It has survived no matter what has been thrown at it. Gods word cannot be destroyed, the most popular book on earth & the most copies printed of any book. Praise God you people! 2 Timothy 3:16,17 ALL SCRIPTURE IS INSPIRED OF GOD... Around 732 B.C Isaiah wrote ISAIAH 40:22 that the earth is a CIRCLE. It was not until 200yrs later that a school of Greek philosophers reasoned that the earth was likely spherical. How did Isaiah know this? He wrote what he was directed to, by the Creator.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

​@@joeythebushkangaroo1you should probably do some reading into new testament authorship. You may learn a great deal...like all 4 gospels were anonymous and written at least 2nd hand decades after the apparent event.... Also a circle is not a sphere....this is a very important detail to differentiate.

[@agemoth]

​@@Johnny_Eh-theistthe word 'Sphere' probably wasn't invented yet?

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​@@joeythebushkangaroo1 you went to a lot of trouble to type all that and then ruined it by suggesting that a circle is the same as a sphere. Nice try.

[@shellygee137]

Both perspectives require faith: a choice to have faith inthe Word of GOD or faith in Darwin's theory and in scientists of the world who choose to not to believe in the Creator.

[@tone9358]

He claims in this video that Pangea existed just before the flood. This is impossible. In order for the contents to move to that far in less than a year time, you would have created enough frictional heat to melt the crust.

[@KenJackson_US]

Do you understand that that's a calculation based on assumptions. Assumptions. Other assumptions would yield other results.

[@miscamisca6775]

"He claims in this video that Pangea existed just before the flood. This is impossible. In order for the contents to move to that far in less than a year time, you would have created enough frictional heat to melt the crust. " I am sorry to to say to you, this is not a forum for facts

[@tone9358]

@@KenJackson_US physics aren’t assumptions, they’re testable & repeatable calculations, the kind of science creationist like. I implore you to find a way in which you can move that much mass that fast without causing a heat problem.

[@KenJackson_US]

@@tone9358 : _"... they’re testable & repeatable ..."_ You think the flood is repeatable? The calculation REQUIRE knowledge of the conditions at the time. Those can only be guessed, assumed. To deny that is to deny science.

[@tone9358]

@@KenJackson_US all you need to calculate is how much mass is there, how far does that mass need to move, how much heat does that friction create, & is the a heat sink large enough to help mitigate that heat? All of those factors we can calculate. If you’re gonna argue physics used to work differently then there should be evidence of that you can provide.

[@jasonlara5069]

I was literally thinking if the dinosaurs fossils were converted by temperature, material force, and lack of oxygen implying the body in a short amount of years or instant.

[@philipgrobler7253]

0:12 - I find it quite ironic that the Word Of God only has so much "authority" as man-made governments permits and allows it to have.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

About the genealogy of the bible. Is that observational science, or historical science? Are the six days of creation observational science, or historical science? When evidence of a homicide is gathered, and someone is sent to prison for life, or sentenced to death for the crime, is that observational science, or historical science? You make a grand distinction between the two, but you don't follow it yourself. You are willing to accept the historical science of the bible, but not the historical science of radiometric dating, for instance. Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If historical science is unreliable, then the bible is unreliable.

[@richardgregory3684]

Espescially as there's no actual evidence for most f the bible.

[@AI2789crg]

They are not saying historical science is not logical, they are saying the old earth, billions of years conclusion by evolutionists is an incorrect interpretation of the historical evidence.

[@AI2789crg]

@@richardgregory3684 no geological discovery has ever disproved anything in the Old Testament, but plenty of geological discoveries have confirmed things written in the Old Testament.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

@@AI2789crg I don't think so. All of the videos I've seen say that radiometric dating is just wrong. So they're just ignoring evidence. By the way, the age of the earth is not a conclusion of evolutionists. It is a conclusion of geologists and physicists. Biology doesn't deal with the age of the earth except tangentially. Another question is why they make that distinction between observational evidence and "historical" evidence?

[@richardgregory3684]

@@AI2789crg Such as? Do give examples of how geological discoveries cinfirm earth (and of course, the whol euniverse too) was conjured into existance a few thousand years ago by an invisible magic wizard. Or hw about some examples of geological evidence that four thousand years ago the entire earth was covered in water more than five miles deep.

[@WilliamBay]

“The tsunamis during the biblical flood were happening every hour” Ok… so, were you there to see it? Looks like you need some of that “Historical Science” to help you out with some evidence, cause I’m pretty sure Genesis doesn’t mention several tsunamis happening every hour. Maybe Moses wrote a ship’s log about it?

[@mikevangelderen9402]

Moses huh 😂

[@WilliamBay]

@@mikevangelderen9402Ooops. Turns out I know as much about the characters in the bible as this guy knows about the age of the Earth. 😂

[@samburns3329]

One of the nicest things about being a YEC is you get to make up stuff as you go and no other YEC will ever call you on it. ☺

[@avafury4584]

You shouldn't mock God

[@WilliamBay]

@@avafury4584 I'm not mocking any god. I'm mocking the people that choose to believe the Earth is 6,000 years old. There are civilizations that are older than 6,000 years, language was invented long before 6,000 years ago. BEER was invented more than 6,000 years ago. Yet these fools trick you into believing the bible is some kind of scientific document.

[@wolfgangbeeber2086]

Imagine that your faith is so thin that you have to come up with a whole new version of science for you to believe. We’ll pray for you 🙏

[@user-gk6ge2jq9q]

Great video!

[@paulmarcil6221]

Creation scientist is an oxymoron. The last thing a 'creation scientist' is a scientist. Irrational belief cannot be swayed by science.

[@eneeland]

Almost none of evolution is science as we understand the scientific method. It is just another faith based religion. With precious little evidence. And before you go caterwauling...I am a PhD organic chemistry who is a professor of chemistry at a major university.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@eneeland Ah yes, a chemist. So uh, what exactly does that have to do with evolutionary biology? Because it sounds to me that you're just pulling a James Tour: touting respectable credentials while trying to discuss an area outside of that expertise, yet demanding to be treated as an expert in it.

[@itsamystery5279]

@@eneeland _I am a PhD organic chemistry who is a professor of chemistry at a major university._ There's today's creationist steaming pile of bullsh!t.

[@VisshanVis]

@@eneeland The top 100 universities across the world all teach evolutionary biology it is a science, not a faith-based religion do you know how many of those same universities teach creationism 0, none, not 1 single university.

[@alantasman8273]

The very founders of most of today's modern fields of scientific inquiry were men and women of faith who sought to understand the creator better. They literally wrote the books still used today to teach the various fields of study. Get up to speed on your knowledge of history.

[@avi8r66]

4,400 years ago several societies around the world existed and show absolutely no sign of disruption. That means no global flood happened. You can push that time period back to even 10,000 years and that problem will still haunt your fictional timeline. Fewer societies were running, but it's not zero.

[@joeythebushkangaroo1]

Really, I'd be interested to know the names of these societies & the places...

[@avi8r66]

@@joeythebushkangaroo1 China and Japan were making pottery and establishing themselves 14,000 years ago. Egypt was building pyramids 5,000 years ago (which means they weren't a new culture at that point). Summeria was also building large temples around then, again, speaks to them being well established already. The people who make up those cultures had been around for a long time prior, shifting from hunter gatherers to less migratory cultures as they learned to farm and trade. Those along the coasts and rivers were learning to make boats for fishing and trade as well. And they didn't just disappear 4,400 years ago. They continued building, they continued fighting and reproducing.

[@alantasman8273]

@@avi8r66 The Chinese and Japanese are the decedents of Shem. The Chinese calendar is lunisolar, incorporating elements of a lunar calendar with those of a solar calendar. It has been in continual use in China for almost 4000 years. Let's see...the flood took place some 4350 years ago...that would be about right. Please get up to speed on your history.

[@mrazyone]

God Had mercy on Noah.. So not everyone will be saved as in Noahs day.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

And the chinese, and the Egyptians, the people of India, those of south America...

[@noel3422]

I totaly believe in a higher power, in my mind i cannot believe the entire cosmos happened randomly, the entire history of man was written by man as written text there are a few things in all "bibles" that make compleat sense, and i do not give one tale more belief than another, its crazy but there are things in all cultures of written history that make some sense except alligory, which was most likely written by man.

[@LeonSemiPro]

Stop the misinformation. Darwin did not just think up his theories from finches. He understood the fossil evidence and proposed a theory that gave a good explanation for why fossil sites contain the remains of extinct life forms. Darwin didn't destroy creationism. Dinosaurs did, simply by existing.

[@katamas832]

Ah yes, the aeronautical engineer telling us about geology and paleontology with conclusions almost no geologist or paleontologists would agree with. Classic AIG

[@dooglitas]

The fact that he is an aeronautical engineer is irrelevant. You have not actually refuted what he said.

[@YECBIB]

Atheism or agnosticism says nothing

[@dooglitas]

@@YECBIB Who is saying that atheism or agnosticism "says" anything? Those who believe in atheism or agnosticism say a great many things. What is your point?

[@katamas832]

@@dooglitas I have no intention of going through an entire half an hour long video's content and debunking it one by one in a comment section just to be completely ignored by creationists anyway. I am also not that well versed in geology, and ya have to be with some of the obscure stuff creationists bring up, so I'd have to do quite a bit of research. Basically, a ton of my time, with no result in the end. No thank you.

[@katamas832]

@@YECBIB Yep, atheism is only a person's personal lack of convinction, and agnosticism is a person's personal lack of knowledge.

[@Stonewall89]

Exactly what we needed in 2024! Great video guys and thank you!

[@rizdekd3912]

@5:27 '...and that pulls the rug right out from underneath the millions of years concept...' Not really. First notice he says the flood explains 'most' of the layers of rock we see....so not all. What he needs to explain are not the deep flat layers of sediment but rather inconformities where rock layers formed...ie sediment was laid down then hardened into sedimentary rock...a process that takes many years, THEN due to movement of the earth's crust, those layers were upended AS SOLID ROCK and then worn off and new sediment was laid down on top of those worn off upended layers of rock and THAT new sediment itself turned to sedimentary rock (many more years) and then IT wore down until we see BOTH rock strata...the more recent rock that is still horizontal AND the rock strata that was upended. THAT cannot have happened in a 1-yr flood, nor even in the few hundreds of years between creation and the flood. The only explanation would be that that is how God created the world, originally. That would mean God intentionally created the rock layers to appear ancient and he would have known full well that is who they would be interpreted.

[@Iberian247]

For size context, the ichthyosaur was slightly larger than the blue whale. The flood waters and sediment must have been inconceivably powerful to freeze frame a live birth! 😮 reference: Ars Technica

[@samburns3329]

Sorry but a literal Noah's Flood / Ark was scientifically disproven over two centuries ago. For example: 1. The world is full of geologic features (angular unconformities, the vertically incised meanders in Goosenecks State Park, the Columbia Basalt Group) impossible to form in a one year one time Flood. 2. We have lots of archaeological evidence of cities and cultures (Jericho is 11,000 years old, The Jiahu culture in China is 9500 years old) which lived right through the Flood without noticing. 3. Modern genetics shows no extant species underwent a severe genetic bottleneck only 4400 years ago. If the Ark story were true ALL extant species would show such a bottleneck. 4. Besides well established radiometric dating we also have lots of non-radiometric proxies (tree rings, lake varves, ice cores) showing the Earth is way older than 6000 years. Arguing about Noah's Ark is like arguing if the Starship Enterprise could beat the Death Star in a 1-on-1 battle. It may be intellectually amusing but has no connection to anything in reality. 🙂

[@robczarski8537]

You think you sound intelligent but in spelling your beliefs out you are only showing your foolishness. You have such faith to believe in your predecessors. Humans. Weak and foolish and ignorant. You have Faith no Bible thumper ever could. Science is only ever been proved wrong yet you adhere to it's accuracy with a zeal and passion we can only call insane. Scientists used to admit science was a work in progress. But you science sycophants have lost sight of that. Every real scientist knows nothing is ever proven impossible. So your disproofs are simply examples that you have abandoned reason.

[@samburns3329]

@@robczarski8537 Feel free to post your scientific rebuttals to the scientific facts I listed. 🙂 You won't of course. No YECs even try.

[@avafury4584]

Not at all. God's word is true.