I really enjoy your videos. But I'd also like to see some problems with differential equations. That would be really interesting.
@haraldblauzahn91882 күн бұрын
In this case I'd prefer solving by looking at the equation. 4 squared equals 16 which equals 2 times 8. So x equals 2.
@zeldathomas34982 күн бұрын
He addresses this in the video, inspection only gives one of the two possible solutions
@ralphhardie74922 күн бұрын
harald failed 😂😂😂
@Zyreath2 сағат бұрын
@@zeldathomas3498-2 is just as intuitive +- pre squaring is a given
@synhegola2 күн бұрын
W-lambert function is not usually on the curriculum in Germany at least. However, you should say in the beginning that you are looking for real solutions, as there are countable many complex ones. So, no you didn't answer your initial question either ;)
@justcommenting224Күн бұрын
Totally agree. Whats the point of solving this problem? Mathematic proficiency can be exercised on problems without the W-lambart. W-lambert is not even a native function on a hp42.
@hydrohelic13 сағат бұрын
8:32 forgot to include the 0 to mark the principal root, good vid tho
@walterwen29753 сағат бұрын
8x = 4ˣ, x > 0; (8x)¹⸍ˣ = (4ˣ)¹⸍ˣ = 4 = 16¹⸍² = [8(2)]¹⸍²; x = 2 One more root can be obtained using Trial-and-error math: x = 0: 4ˣ = 4⁰ = 1 > 8(0) = 0; x = 0.5: 4⁰·⁵ = 2 < 8(0.5) = 4; 0.5 > x > 0, Slightly > 0
@Teth472 күн бұрын
I feel like the triviality of an empirical solution to this particular equation undermines the educational purpose of the video here. When one istrying to showa general solution, one should avoid problems that can be solved almost by reflex, the presence of that easy solution distracts from the general one.
Very complicated methods that totally baffle me. I solved it in 5 seconds simply using arithmetic, what number when squaring 4 gives the same result as multiplying by 8, that number has to be 2 Why make it complicated? 12:25
@jimmycricket738511 сағат бұрын
Where's the other solution? This isn't a linear equation with a single solution. There's a hidden solution that arithmetic alone won't uncover.
@MrDominicharrison6 сағат бұрын
@@jimmycricket7385not sure what u mean. 4 squared = 8x2, that’s it. It’s pure n simple. No other solutions
@andrewluxton306213 минут бұрын
There are 2 solutions
@prollysine2 күн бұрын
W(-4ln2*e^(-4ln2))=W(-ln8x*e^(-ln8x)) , -4ln2=-ln8x , 16=8x , x1=2 , W(-ln4/8)=-ln8x , x2=e^(-W(-ln4/8))/8 , x2=~ 0.154953 , test x1=2 , 4^2=8*2 , OK , test x2=~ 0.154953 , 4^0.154953=~ 1.23953 , 8*0.154953=~ 1.23953 , same , OK ,
@sundareshvenugopal657519 сағат бұрын
4^2 = 8 * 2.
@andrewluxton306214 минут бұрын
There are 2 solutions.
@davidseed29392 күн бұрын
so in an exam or with only a calculator (not a computer) how do you find the value 0.155
@wes96272 күн бұрын
Use fixed-point or Newton-Raphson iteration. In this case set x←ln(8x)/ln4. In general one or another form of fixed-point iteration may not converge, so it may be necessary to try different forms until finding one that converges. For example, maybe x←(4^x)/8 will converge or from lnx=ln(4^x/8) converted to x←e^{n(4^x/8)} one of these will converge. Complex values for x may also be obtained using fixed-point iteration, but only using complex arithmetic, but most pocket calculators don't support. complex arithmetic.
@Rishon-n5j2 күн бұрын
I got this question in my college assignment 2^x=20 ; find x . Well Most of the students in my college got this wrong including me
@Misha-g3b2 күн бұрын
@Rishon-n5j x=lg20/lg2=4,3219... .
@b.michaelzimmermann49932 күн бұрын
There are no colleges in Europe. Dismissed.
@PeterChapman-rg6gr2 күн бұрын
There are lots of "Collages" in the UK and when I last looked the UK was still part of the European Continent but thankfully no longer ensnared by the EU. Looks like someone funked their Geography lessons.
@Gideon_Judges62 күн бұрын
What about University College London, and don't gimme no brexit/schmexit?
@blintzy69692 күн бұрын
Yeah bro istg anyone says that doesn’t count the United Kingdom is still in the Continent of Europe
@RanBlakePianoКүн бұрын
Wish I could hear you !
@rubinkatz9850Күн бұрын
x=2
@stantackett107Күн бұрын
I solved this in ¼ second. X=2. A 12 minute video? Smh...
@andrewluxton306214 минут бұрын
There are 2 solutions.
@Cernl.12 күн бұрын
Why Ghanaians solve this in 2 seconds 😊❤🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭❤️❤️♥️🇬🇭💕🇬🇭🇬🇭♥️
@ralphhardie74922 күн бұрын
And get a fail😂😂😂
@akunokopeter379Күн бұрын
I pity you @@ralphhardie7492
@Misha-g3b2 күн бұрын
2.
@Ryans-Travels2 күн бұрын
Painfully slow. If your audience knows what a natural log is you don't need to take 30 seconds to explain you're reversing whats on either side of an equals sign or two minutes to solve basic steps
@sabakunnahar60552 күн бұрын
😂
@bayrambenbrahem44612 күн бұрын
Fancy shmancy math
@PeterChapman-rg6gr2 күн бұрын
The answer is obvious and can be found by just looking at the equation for 5 seconds.
@AdrianFagg2 күн бұрын
How to say I didn’t watch the video without saying I didn’t watch the video.
@thecrazzxz33832 күн бұрын
But he told to SOLVE the equation, which means to get ALL the solutions ?