Law of Evidence in criminal law,what a presentation with examples.we are indebted to you sir 👍
@aturkimi86263 жыл бұрын
It is our previlage to be able to learn from such eminent jurists.
@justiceonlinelegalservices3 жыл бұрын
Amazing lecture, Thank you so much Mr. S. Nagamuthu sir.
@sobhanaamma2513 жыл бұрын
The lectures are most advanced and applied logic in interpretation of evidence law. Wonderful revelation of evidence law.
@subramanyammn47433 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir. This lecture should be heard to students who appear exams on Evidence Act. Great presentation by Ld. Judge.
@josepi97624 жыл бұрын
He is a man down to earth. His classes are very good & lucid.
@mansikasana43194 жыл бұрын
Honourable Justice gives an insightful explanation always
@dineshlabde18012 жыл бұрын
Great great & simply great....lovely argument by res sir in resent UP child murder & rape case ,...SC aqueted the accuse.....great argument ........
@bhaskarnaidu90973 жыл бұрын
Truly informative and what a clarity of explanation .Great by his Lordship Justice S.Nagamuthu Sir
@isroylex5 жыл бұрын
You are such great humanist having interest tech young advocates in India and I am one of them thank you . In fact I prepared a notes on your speech
@prakashkaramchandani70634 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sir, it's so beautifully and elaborately explained , it cleared so many doubts of evidence act
@leninvinober64884 жыл бұрын
Wonderful presentation, helps to understand the concepts easily.
@dr.kantarajtavaneadvocate19064 жыл бұрын
Senior Advocate and Justice Nagamuthu is a rear diamond as his name suggests.
@venkatathirisrinivasan68163 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. Excellent Sir. Its very useful for individual Advocates without practice under the senior like me.
@indikarupasinghe66192 жыл бұрын
very good lecture. very useful, thank you Sir and Friday group.
@adityatripathy88682 жыл бұрын
So well explained with lots of patience.!👍👍👍
@shree96472 жыл бұрын
Sir is always Cristal clear
@shekhartalashilkar70633 жыл бұрын
Easy presentation of complicated subject. Thank you very much.
@rdikas4234 Жыл бұрын
Great experience Sir
@rajeevkumarnegi70844 жыл бұрын
Genius sir.Thanks lots ji.Jai🇮🇳Hind.
@gramodayshiksha53873 жыл бұрын
Very nice sir
@AbdulMajeed-px9zj5 жыл бұрын
Sir This video is very useful to every citizen thanks a lot
@Vijay-bv3vd4 жыл бұрын
Spiffing, your lecture is, my lord. Very useful
@SaddamHusain-sk6my3 жыл бұрын
Wow explained in lucid Manner....👍👍
@gvthiruppathilawoffice88455 жыл бұрын
Thank u Mr. Hon’ble Justice I watched ur superb lecture in the evidence Act,
@vijayakumarpoovar88904 жыл бұрын
There cannot be any presumption when courts accept the evidence of eye witnesses.
@balarampandit51583 жыл бұрын
Truely brilliant on Evidence Act
@TheAdvajaykhaire Жыл бұрын
Grateful Sir
@UdayKumar-zm9rp3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for addressing on judicial evidence
@sudhakarpula43532 жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir
@cookwithrakhi40203 жыл бұрын
its wonderful 👏👏👏👏👏
@anujkkkkk4 жыл бұрын
Great lecture... Most useful
@mk.justahuman84394 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Great insight
@advocaterambabu5 жыл бұрын
Superb sir....thank u very much
@yogasreealladi91192 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture
@ShekharKumar_965 жыл бұрын
Much awaited clip. Thanks a ton, sir.
@dr.dasharathwalekaradvocat44744 жыл бұрын
I have no words to appreciate Justice(Retd) S Nagamuthu I would like to meet if possible
@sanvisingh99644 жыл бұрын
Best lecture on evidence act
@mukhtaradv22214 жыл бұрын
Exceptional sir
@surajitdutta12013 жыл бұрын
Respected sir kindly make classes on criminal trial in cases in connection with warranty complaints and summary as well as with adduce evidence sections🙏
@MVS8624 жыл бұрын
Excellent session sir
@commonerIndian5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant!!
@farooqshah69604 жыл бұрын
More and more lectures plz
@kiranrawat24874 жыл бұрын
Very useful.The person coughing throughout the video is distrubing the entire session.😓
@oooo-kz6er Жыл бұрын
I am proud to say i am from his native place
@muthumaniveeramuthu2381 Жыл бұрын
Iyya vanakam one of my told about you i hardly trying to see u in supremcourt but i couldn't .
@muthumaniveeramuthu2381 Жыл бұрын
one of my friend told about you iyya
@muthumaniveeramuthu2381 Жыл бұрын
Always downtrodden peoplesuffered by dramatic and false evidence it may be domination of highercommunity to the lowercommunity
@mitanshgupta13984 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot
@No.its_swaaan2 жыл бұрын
"Proved." A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists.
@mukhtaradv22213 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@verasenaverasena56392 жыл бұрын
Nice
@neon32293 жыл бұрын
Very nice sir from odisha
@abyabraham96554 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@commonerIndian4 жыл бұрын
Super
@Pradeepkumar-jj4vg4 жыл бұрын
Wonderful
@AdvShams4 жыл бұрын
My favourite
@devidast1123 Жыл бұрын
What is the import and impact of S 57(1) of the Indian Evidence Act?
@sobhanaamma2513 жыл бұрын
Cough is a disturbance.
@babu.mmanickam27123 жыл бұрын
Nice presentation, but failed to mention whether the section 133 prevails over the section 114(b) or not
@josepi97624 жыл бұрын
7.35-36.Is it u/s162 of Crpc, sir.
@prabakhart61085 жыл бұрын
Someone was coughing in front of Mike which makes disturbance to hear the rule of law.
@wilsonrobithankayyan15474 жыл бұрын
1
@powerfulshetkari89493 жыл бұрын
Please keep lecture on cross examination
@subramaniansukumarapillai3874 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@sanjeevsirohi8056 Жыл бұрын
Please organise a lecture on why Uttar Pradesh which tops the State list in having maximum number of pending cases has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad and nowhere else and why the litigants of West UP of 30 districts have been attached with Allahabad and not with Lucknow where there is a Bench which was just not needed as it is so close to Allahabad and nowhere else due to which the litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad to seek justice and this despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP and for which Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Jaswant Singh recommended three HC Benches and yet not one created and for Maharashtra which is the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud and which already had multiple HC Benches was given one more at Aurangabad in 1985 but not a single for West UP or even for whole of Uttar Pradesh as recommended? Why lawless Bihar which is the home state of incumbent President of Supreme Court Bar Association Mr Vikas Singh has not even a single HC Bench? Kindly explain! My very best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate
@ganesh2701923 жыл бұрын
Sir
@reyansh46403 жыл бұрын
Case डिसीजन-- We the juveniles after admonishing them. There shall be no disqualification of the juvenile and records concerning to this case shall be removed that the concerned authority as per section 19 of the juvenile Justice act 2000. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. पुलिस वेरिफिकेशन में सरकारी नौकरी में दिक्कत आएगी सर