I love this movie, it doesn't just tug on your heartstrings, it yanks on them.
@yasminhadj36822 жыл бұрын
Magnifique commentaire c mon sentiment aussi envers le livre et l'histoire et même au cinéma
@smitha50222 жыл бұрын
She was so trampled on that she couldn't accept or believe that somebody would actually love her. That is so sad.
@englishliterature60562 жыл бұрын
But that happens...it is very hard to believe that love can be there when one receives only hurt after hurt in want of love.
@monmothma3358 Жыл бұрын
True, and also he was her boss/superior, _and_ had endeavored to deceive her into thinking he loved someone else. No wonder she found it hard to believe
@ENFPerspectives Жыл бұрын
He doesnt love her. He wants her 20 year old body. Rofl. Atleast in the version I am watching, he is old enough to be her dad.
@ENFPerspectives Жыл бұрын
@@monmothma3358 He was manipulating her, to make her want him, because he knew she didnt. However, if she became jealous he was giving attention to someone else, she may lose her place in the household. She doesnt love him. She is loving being taken care of because she never had a dad. This movie is definately showing the role of women, as caretakers and being used by men. He treated her pathetically in the beginning. This movie urks me.
@monmothma3358 Жыл бұрын
@@ENFPerspectives What the heck? Did you write this story? Jane Eyre was most definitely in love with Mr Rochester and he with her, and no, not just "for her body". If you read the book, you'll find that the two have a pretty equal relationship, certainly by the end when she's no longer in his service and has gotten her own fortune, but also before, as she was quite strong mentally and morally, and he admired that. If I remember correctly, they actually both manipulate one other a little bit, it's not just him pretending he's marrying someone else to make her admit she loved him.
@carlie.carlie Жыл бұрын
"It is my spirit that addresses your spirit" oooh this scene is just *chef's kiss*
@gabrielaburcea57342 жыл бұрын
It's so sad to know that he knew all the time he was married and couldn't marry someone else and especially to fool Jane like that, who never would have accepted that degrading situation... I understand the tragedy of Mr. Rochester marriage, but he should have done the right thing for Jane. He should have found a way to legally divorce his mad wife and still take care of her, she didn't need to be in the same house, he could have paid for a home for her with more than one nurse to take care of her and then ask Jane to marry him, after, of course, explaining why he didn't tell her his secret until now and why he divorced. Jane might have left anyways, dissapointed in him lying to her and being a married man while getting close to her, but she would have forgiven him sooner. Mr. Rochester did this very wrong and very selfishly and paid for it too, almost with his life. I am sorry he hurt her so much after she suffered that abuse as a child, she really didn't deserve it. It was mad luck that they cold finally be together and the wife not in the way anymore. Unfortunatelly, in real life, we should keep away from somene resembling Mr. Rochester.
@tctcpa Жыл бұрын
I cannot get enough of that scene. Just incredible acting and so believable and touching.
@luzpueblalara4128Күн бұрын
True, I have been obsessed over this film since yesterday, the acting is striking! ❤
@sMiLeS13252 жыл бұрын
This is my second favorite adaptation!! The 1983 BBC version will always have my heart, but this is a very close second!
@elisefincher44782 жыл бұрын
Same for me but a close 3rd to this adaptation is the 1943 solely for the amazing performance Orson Welles put in as Rochester.
@janebishop5885 Жыл бұрын
The 1983 version with Dalton and Clark is without peer. This version is cringeworthy down to be the glaring grammatical error in Jane's script.
@sMiLeS1325 Жыл бұрын
@@janebishop5885 If this was the only other version I had seen, I would agree with you. However, as long as we live in a world where the 1996 Jane Eyre exists, this will ring through with a high rating.
@bubokeeper Жыл бұрын
yes! Tim Dalton was a far better Rochester imo!
@findingthatperfectspot469211 ай бұрын
@@janebishop5885 That 'for I to leave you' drives me bonkers. Whoever wrote that line needs to be locked up in a cell with a grammar book as his/her only companion.
@Amacott992 жыл бұрын
I have to admit….the BBC production is my no 1. What a fantastic story.
@medusagorgon92 жыл бұрын
*swoon* The words in this scene are without equal! I adore Jane Austen especially 'Persuasion', but this is intimate gold.
@simonettaqualizza60572 жыл бұрын
You are right! I adore Jane Austen! And I adore "Pride and Prejudice"!!!
@gabrielaburcea57342 жыл бұрын
And this was not written by Jane Austen
@monmothma3358 Жыл бұрын
@@gabrielaburcea5734 I don't think she thought it was, I think she was comparing this to Austen.
@Dessert_x_Tat Жыл бұрын
Fassbender. BRILLIANT since "Shame".
@nitishabhakhri43127 ай бұрын
If we analyze the scene,Jane at first was a bit confused and terrified to actually accept the proposal,I honestly think that before the confession it was kind of like an argument,Mr Rochester is a simple man,whereas I find jane a bit clever,but the scene is so fucking beautiful that I have no words to describe it❤❤❤✨️✨️🫀
@just_in_key Жыл бұрын
Omg i just realized he sat there with his dog in the end of the movie 🥹
@brendalaird694210 ай бұрын
The best version is Ciarian Hinds as Mr. Rochester! He is Rochester…
@ylgorke27009 ай бұрын
For me also the best version ( 1997). Super. Ciaran Hinds & Samantha Morton. 🤗
@julialeite69232 жыл бұрын
Some orphans fare better than others.
@dreamcatcher4014 ай бұрын
I thought this scene looked awfully awkward when it came to the kissing LOL 😂 this version of the movie was ok yet between the actors there wasn’t any chemistry in my opinion the 2006 version was better.
@romerodias3850 Жыл бұрын
I will not cheat myself. I will suffer.😐
@degalan265614 күн бұрын
Fabulous…
@Evi19Black2 жыл бұрын
I like that in this story no one cares about the age difference between Rochester and Jane And surprise their relationship worked
@Evi19Black2 жыл бұрын
:)))❤️
@gabrielaburcea57342 жыл бұрын
It that time in England, most 35-40 men married 16 to 23 girls. They had to have the means to keep a family and a home, an income for the many kids and wife. At 19 they couldnt for sure. And given the neverending immaturity of guys, I don't think it was bad.
@Evi19Black2 жыл бұрын
❤️🦔
@Evi19Black2 жыл бұрын
❤️
@Evi19Black2 жыл бұрын
Ich habe fünf Punkte 🥳
@louisepagels90322 жыл бұрын
He was the best
@Catseye189 Жыл бұрын
Ummm to avoid bigamy, be honest with your girlfriend that you have a wife. Lying to both is against your religion and rude.
@JennyMack-rm9fk2 ай бұрын
He was advised to jane away so romance took place in wales away from bertha and others. She returned among servants two years later never said what occurred between her and roschester a letter arrived for house keeper meeting with jane she left never returned he was taken to her after fire remember the were in wales based store small hamlet called pelican brief bird sanctuary outside Australia.
@ancamirela3386 Жыл бұрын
She is a good Jane, but he is too soft spoken and too tame for Rochester. The character is portrayed in the book as being rough, proud, arrogant even and controlling. I dont really like this set back Rochester. I also dont feel the passion, the chemistry.
@sokamori28 Жыл бұрын
1997 with Ciaran Hinds and Samantha Morton the best for me
@ylgorke27009 ай бұрын
@@sokamori28 This is true. Best Mr. R. and Jane .
@elenafoleyfoley1682 жыл бұрын
🌹
@0815Horst Жыл бұрын
I am sorry to say that, but these two great actors have zero chemistry.
@gee2541 Жыл бұрын
That's crazy cause they definitely do to many people.
@Highstakess_ Жыл бұрын
I just watched the movie and I think they have a great chemistry
@axiantian8922 Жыл бұрын
Very disappointed with the actress's performance. She is not Jane Eyre, not at all.