Cross Multiply

  Рет қаралды 48,793

Mr H Tutoring

Mr H Tutoring

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 59
@mivids100
@mivids100 10 ай бұрын
I never get tired of watching your content
@jadajamb
@jadajamb 10 ай бұрын
A shorter way is ..Just do a reciprocal on both sides. and separate terms.
@franklinemix8048
@franklinemix8048 10 ай бұрын
Exactly the method I used.
@Prathap_7055
@Prathap_7055 10 ай бұрын
​@@franklinemix8048we 3 thought this on the first sight of this problem 😅
@carlcairns4078
@carlcairns4078 10 ай бұрын
Mr H. Great teacher! ❤❤
@Itachii345
@Itachii345 10 ай бұрын
In the Q. We are asked with ratio/Fraction of n:m so you could even transfer like this: -2m=n -2=n/m (Here is your answer!)
@Gbhmagic
@Gbhmagic 10 ай бұрын
very cool. im studying Trig on my own from books now. Saddly in the US the schools all are utterly dependent on graphing calculators.. The text books are.not just 600$ but also are essential nothing short of a manual for whatever the calculator the school is selling.
@SwitchRoomCafe
@SwitchRoomCafe 10 ай бұрын
Instead of plugging in (-2m) for n, you could've taken (-2m) = n and divided m, giving you -2=n/m, which was the question. I love finding more than one way to solve a problem, even if it's not drastically different.
@foxster.mp4
@foxster.mp4 10 ай бұрын
We don’t know if m is nonzero tho. Would that be an issue?
@aleycolt3824
@aleycolt3824 10 ай бұрын
@@foxster.mp4 we do know that m is non zero from the equation. If m were zero, it would be 0/x which equals 0 and not 1/5. (if x were 0, as it should be, we would have 0/0, which is also not 1/5) It's also why we can cancel the m in the second part. I hope a lot of questions like this state that m=/=0 though.
@83Mohamad8Hassn
@83Mohamad8Hassn 10 ай бұрын
❤❤🎉🎉😊😊
@mircoceccarelli6689
@mircoceccarelli6689 10 ай бұрын
👍👍👍🤪👋
@muzakkyadhitya6471
@muzakkyadhitya6471 10 ай бұрын
From the equation, can we assume that m=1 and 3m-n=5? 3m-n=5 3(1)-n=5 n=-2 n/m=(-2)/1=(-2)
@thedeadly8190
@thedeadly8190 10 ай бұрын
No bro ..this is wrong
@muzakkyadhitya6471
@muzakkyadhitya6471 10 ай бұрын
@@thedeadly8190: Why wrong?
@thedeadly8190
@thedeadly8190 10 ай бұрын
​How can we assume without solving it on top of that 3m-n can't equal to 5.it is not mentioned hope you got my point😊​@@muzakkyadhitya6471
@aleycolt3824
@aleycolt3824 10 ай бұрын
The danger of your answer is that we cannot assume the values of m or n. In fact we are not required to know the values. The answer merely requires us to determine the relationship between n and m. If I assumed m=5, then I could still get n/m=-2 (n would be -10) The assumption works because the relationship is linear. This question is designed to test your ability to cross multiply and perform a subsitution. If later questions involved multiple powers (quadratic equations) or other functions, your method would prove wrong as the top could be strictly less than 1
@apexgoblin
@apexgoblin 10 ай бұрын
well 2/10, 3/15, 4/20... are also equal to 1/5. Why don't you take m=2 or m=3 or any other real number
@OPNURISYDER
@OPNURISYDER 10 ай бұрын
Thank you, Professor!
@Life2Live4u
@Life2Live4u 10 ай бұрын
Интересно
@dougr.2398
@dougr.2398 10 ай бұрын
This can be figured out “by inspection”. (Mental “eyeballing”) by dividing both sides of the fraction on the left by m. This leaves you one on top and 2- n/m as the denominator, which in order to equal 5, requires that n/m = -3
@wbug
@wbug 10 ай бұрын
I think that might be a typo..?
@dougr.2398
@dougr.2398 10 ай бұрын
@@wbugthere is more than one error, no typos 😊
@dougr.2398
@dougr.2398 10 ай бұрын
Just switch the 3 and the 2
@wbug
@wbug 10 ай бұрын
Yup@@dougr.2398
@wbug
@wbug 10 ай бұрын
But correct explanation
@EUTSTube
@EUTSTube 10 ай бұрын
I made the reciprocal of the equation (3m-n)/m=5; 3 - n/m = 5 Finally transposing n/m then getting 3-5=-2
@luisclementeortegasegovia8603
@luisclementeortegasegovia8603 10 ай бұрын
Always a nice and productive class! Thanks! 👍
@hiyelow2999
@hiyelow2999 10 ай бұрын
Um, shareholder percentage?? What is shareholder percentage and dividends?
@AramLyricMashups
@AramLyricMashups 10 ай бұрын
I also got -2 but in a different way
@frederickwilt5541
@frederickwilt5541 10 ай бұрын
Good stuff
@Harsh-bg4po
@Harsh-bg4po 10 ай бұрын
Thank you sir
@olenhol2przez4
@olenhol2przez4 10 ай бұрын
m/3m-n = 1/5 => m=1 3m-n=5 => 3*1-n=5 => n=(-2) n/m = -2/1 = -2... Why overthink it...
@andrewclifton9772
@andrewclifton9772 10 ай бұрын
m / (3m - n) = 1 / 5 ; Divide top and bottom of the LHS by m 1 / (3 - (n / m)) = 1 / 5 ; So left denominator = right denominator 3 - (n / m) = 5 ; So n/m = -2
@Quest3669
@Quest3669 10 ай бұрын
Better u reverse both side .. now very easy to find
@joecortizo
@joecortizo 10 ай бұрын
You could also apply ^-1 to each side, then cancel 3m with m, then you'd have n/m=-2. Good Lord, I'm smart... 😂
@anderslvolljohansen1556
@anderslvolljohansen1556 10 ай бұрын
-2m=n, divide by m on both sides: -2=n/m
@Exler_Ko
@Exler_Ko 10 ай бұрын
Actually you could just ÷m by both side to get the answer
@Geoffsmeg
@Geoffsmeg 10 ай бұрын
Thank you 😀🙂+=++=-%
@Harsh-bg4po
@Harsh-bg4po 10 ай бұрын
Sir please upload shorts on integration
@shahbazahmad8972
@shahbazahmad8972 10 ай бұрын
which level integration؟
@shahbazahmad8972
@shahbazahmad8972 10 ай бұрын
which level integrate?
@sailexw6414
@sailexw6414 10 ай бұрын
I got to it like this: seperate: m/3m - m/n = 1/5 flip: 3m/m - n/m = 5 simplify: 3-n/m = 5, -n/m = 2, n/m = -2
@shashibalarai1146
@shashibalarai1146 10 ай бұрын
I did this by comparing LHS and RHS I.e. Given: m/( 3m - n) =1/5 So let LHS numerator = RHS numerator I.e. m=1 And LHS denominator = RHS denominator I.e. 3m - n = 5 ( now putting value of m from above, we get) 3(1) - n =5 3 - n = 5 n = -2 Evaluating n/m we get -2/1 I.e. -2 Is this a wrong method 🤔
@franklinemix8048
@franklinemix8048 10 ай бұрын
I have a different method though.
@420sakura1
@420sakura1 10 ай бұрын
Cancel m in the lhs giving 1/(3-n/m)) = 1/5 X multiplying 5= 3-n/m Thus n/m= -2
@Sahasrakaash
@Sahasrakaash 10 ай бұрын
Who came to know that the numbers and the letters on his board are just lights
@shahbazahmad8972
@shahbazahmad8972 10 ай бұрын
which technique is he using?
@Antonela.Stoica
@Antonela.Stoica 10 ай бұрын
The answer is -2.
@giannaleoci2328
@giannaleoci2328 10 ай бұрын
m/(3m-n)=1/5 5m=3m-n 2m=-n 2m/m=-n/m n/m=-2
@cliffordabrahamonyedikachi8175
@cliffordabrahamonyedikachi8175 10 ай бұрын
-2
@lawdelber3593
@lawdelber3593 10 ай бұрын
(m÷m)/[(3m-n)÷m] = 1/5 1/(3-n÷m)=1/5 5=3-n/m n/m=-2
Improve Your Writing - 6 ways to compare
10:33
English with Emma · engVid
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Chain Game Strong ⛓️
00:21
Anwar Jibawi
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
REAL or FAKE? #beatbox #tiktok
01:03
BeatboxJCOP
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
99.9% IMPOSSIBLE
00:24
STORROR
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
Why you didn't learn tetration in school[Tetration]
6:23
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 4,9 МЛН
The Algebra Step that EVERYONE Gets WRONG!
17:54
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 331 М.
Factoring Quadratics WITHOUT Guessing Product & Sum
20:01
JensenMath
Рет қаралды 405 М.
Master Partial Fractions in 4mins | All Forms Explained Step-By-Step
4:21
Math Mysteries Unlocked
Рет қаралды 3 М.
how to study less and get higher grades
11:16
Gohar Khan
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
How to STUDY so FAST it feels like CHEATING
8:03
The Angry Explainer
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
Animation vs. Math
14:03
Alan Becker
Рет қаралды 81 МЛН
A tricky problem from Harvard University Interview
18:11
Higher Mathematics
Рет қаралды 594 М.
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН