PAUL BOUGHT SOUL TO THIS!! The Beatles - Oh Darling! | REACTION (2009 Remastered)

[@patriciaedwards5183]

That's all Paul. He wasn't called the man of a thousand voices for nothing. And the best rock voice to me.

[@patticrichton1135]

ABSOLUTELY!!!

[@rethink62]

AGREED 👍👍👍👍

[@blitztim6416]

This is the original

[@DianeLake-sw3ym]

100 percent Paul. And it is the original song.

[@debjorgo]

There were no vocal overdubs here. This is all Paul. This is what Paul was known for, screaming, hard Rock vocals. The Beatles' remasters got rid of tap hiss.

[@Kieop]

sounds like reverb.

[@debjorgo]

@@Kieop A little tape echo. Nothing that wasn't on the recording in 1969.

[@Andytheashton]

@@Kieopbe double tracked it and spent a few days practising because the vocal was so aggressive.

[@thedogwoods5716]

@@debjorgo he def is using some echo and double track here and there

[@thedogwoods5716]

@@debjorgohe double tracks in the middle and uses echo at times

[@dionysiacosmos]

Paul spent a week in the studio roughing up his voice to his satisfaction beforehand. Had he not, his voice, in his opinion would have been to smooth.

[@gioconda43]

That's only Paul!! He's known for having a versatile singing voice! 😊😊 This is one of my favourite but there are other examples of what he could do with his voice!

[@OneRaxy]

The "other voice" you hearing in screaming parts are the echo effect they added on the record. But its just paul, maybe some overdubs right and there. The other beatles are doing the harmony parts. Another great vocal performance from Paul is "Ive got a feeling" live from rooftop concert. please check it out

[@discoex1]

On the lead vocal, it's Paul doubling his lead vocal, plus some vocal effects. Regarding the backing vocals, it's Paul, John, and George doing the backing vocals.

[@michaelmccollum2774]

Paul McCartney said his greatest influence in rock and roll was Little Richard who’s influence can be heard in that scream you backed up at 2:16. (John’s favorite early rocker was Chuck Berry, George’s was Carl Perkins)

[@mikecaetano]

Accept no imitations! 😃 The Beatles remasters don't add anything new to the songs, like vocal stacks or whatnot, they merely bring out what was always already there with extra clarity. Bear in mind that some of us have been listening to The Beatles our entire lives going back to the sixties, so we know every song practically by heart, every fill, every drum hit, every bass line, every vocal tic and so on. And that makes it easy for us to spot an imitation or an outtake or a live version in contrast. If a remaster changed the songs we would know. By the way, Abbey Road is one of the greatest albums of the 20th century. It's full of classic songs any one of which would make for a fine reaction. But also note that the whole second side of the album pretty much flows together as one long song starting from "You Never Give Me Your Money" and ending with "The End", although "Her Majesty", a twenty second hidden track, caps off the medley quite nicely. Tackle it if you will, but good luck figuring out where to pause because it's full of change ups. Maybe listen to that without interruption and then drop in the KZbin interruptions during the edit. But for something more straight forward from that album, check out "Here Comes The Sun" if you haven't already, but go for the album track itself to avoid the distraction from the video. The video is fine, but we didn't have that back when and the song doesn't need it anyway. It's so good it spins its own video in the listeners imagination.

[@robinfoster7597]

I listen on vinyl and the backing vocals are higher in the mix - I love analogue. :)

[@vlcccapt]

Modern music, including Rap and Hip Hop, would not be the same without the Beatles. They changed the way music and "records" were made. They, and Geoge Martin, developed recording techniques and new combinations of sounds and instruments to evolve music to never before seen levels. All without auto tune or pitch correction!

[@MugnifyRTS]

The Beatles had no Influence on HipHop

[@paulcollins7185]

@@MugnifyRTS You don't know the Beatles or any much of their records at all....

[@lindasalvaterra1304]

Yes Paul did a lot of screaming, straining his voice back then. Unfortunately, it has taken a toll on his vocal ability. But Paul is my favorite artist, composer, singer of all time! His catalog is so vast and his songs are all so different. Really still in awe of how one person could create that many awesome, catchy, timeless tunes! I just love his music! So many masterpieces! Not to mention..... Paul is just a great guy! Everyone loves him!

[@larryfried7742]

Paul is Double Tracked singing with himself. When this recording was made you actually had to sing it more than once yourself listening through headphones. No digital cut and pasting back then . You had to DO IT!

[@vincenttesoriero3614]

The first one wasn't a cover. It was Paul siging live with his new band when he was older.

[@MugnifyRTS]

How do you know?

[@mjj2311]

He’s right. The first version was a live version. Second was album.

[@paulettelamontagne6992]

​@@mjj2311he can woohoo and do it all live just as well

[@paulettelamontagne6992]

Now I got to hear Maxwell's hammer it's the next song on the album I think

[@paulettelamontagne6992]

It's the same I grew up on remastered it didn't matter

[@SaverioP]

The Beatles did a lot of double tracking of their vocals. It's all over many of their tracks. Curt Cobain did the same thing specifically because the Beatles did it.

[@dionysiacosmos]

One day, in the 1980s, I went outside to help my mom with some yardwork. I knew a new Wings song was going to be released that day or the next so I left our stereo on, playing the station that would most likely play it first. Eventually, I worked my way so far from the house that all I could hear was the baseline. I had stopped paying much attention. Suddenly, I stopped. I knew Paul's base so well, Even though I knew nothing about the tempo of the new song, I conscious recognized it 15 seconds after really hearing it, and knew it was the new one. Yeah, yeah, yeah! Don't worry, you'll get eventually.🧓🎸🎭💖

[@kaychristensen4394]

This will knock your socks off! 😎

[@GaryMarkley-h3z]

As a boomer, oh yes to this day!

[@somethingyousaid5059]

A master class in cord shredding.

[@somethingyousaid5059]

And chord shredding.

[@christianmarler2253]

The Beatles often double-recorded the lead vocals for the specific effects it creates. The same singer records it twice and the two takes are played back together.

[@mikefetterman6782]

That is all Paul vocally. The Beatles learned a trick in 1965 using double tracked vocals to fill out the sound and make the voice sound richer. It also allows some cover up of little micro flats or sharps. John Lennon swore by his double tracked (slap back echo, or slight delay) vocals, being uneasy about his own voice.

[@mikefetterman6782]

The other Beatles do back him with the "ooohs and ahhhhhhs" at the end.

[@Andytheashton]

He double tracked the vocal. The harmonies are great and George Harrison on bass sounds like Paul McCartney playing bass. Great tune.

[@Andytheashton]

This is also mccartney trying to do his version of some r&b blues music called ‘swamp music’

[@jamiewilson3599]

All Paul. And remember, autotune hadn't been invented yet. There is video of him arriving at the studio early, just so he could work the vocals and get his voice to just the right rasp and growl.

[@jahl14]

Ringo is killing it

[@user-mq5kt5dr9h]

RIngo has said that he never made a mistake, and I think it's true.

[@ericlewis217]

Paul McCartney's greatest vocal of all time on the greatest rock album of all time.

[@barbaracollins385]

You can never go wrong with the Beatles. They had something for everyone.

[@Keith-kk6dq]

Little Richard oooo,ooooh!

[@user-mq5kt5dr9h]

Paul: BEST R and R screamer of all time. Hey, check out his Kansas City.

[@Talanskiver]

Great Stuff Mugs!

[@Eskay1206]

Pauls rock voice -Try Helter Skelter, Johns rock voice, twist and shout, revolution

[@kpmac1]

John made the comment that he thinks he should've sang this song. I'm sure it would've been good but I can't imagine it would've been better than Paul's performance here.

[@Kathmak]

It's all Paul, my friend 😊

[@mohamedfarook7140]

100% Paul McCartney. This was recorded in the 1960s when the technology was not so good as now. So, the remastering took care of it and made it clearer. Paul sang rock, blues, country, classic etc. He so versatile.

[@brucelamberton8819]

It's all Paul's vocals.

[@Kknightmcc]

Not to take away from Paul's performance, but Robin Gibb sang the heck out of this when performing in the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band movie with this brothers.

[@noles9998]

That’s all Paul, he was the most versatile in his voice VS the others. He also practice this song screaming in order to get his voice right to hit this lyrics, he wanted his voice to sound strained when singing it.

[@davidwolf4677]

Paul sometimes channeled some Little Richard.

[@mark4262]

It's ALL PAUL

[@mgonzales56]

This is the original recording, nothing added, nothing away. Remasters only clean up the sound of the original without changing anything. A re-mixed version is different, in that they actually change the original version. This is what came out in 1969, and the vocal ia all Paul McCartney.

[@SophiesDriver]

That was all Paul

[@allannancarrow8034]

You can see now why we had our say about that other version. Nothing like the original

[@ClearTheRubble7]

Two of my all-time favorite artists are the Beatles and Ren/The Big Push (who have busked a few Beatles songs over the years)--and you are one of my favorite reactors to both of them. Puts me in a great mood!

[@nancysmith38]

🌻♥️

[@maddmuggs]

One of my favorites…….

[@Jacobde13e]

1000 stops on the man with the 1000 voices... 😢😢😢

[@backbeat44]

you stop it WAY TOO much. it really breaks up the feel. they added nothing, it's the same recording.

[@MugnifyRTS]

My feel and your feel are two different feels 😂

[@dougsusie2319]

Here's the scoop my man. Beatles remasters from 2009 even the remixes from 2017 thru now which sound incredible are in no way tampered with. These are the original version's. There are no stacked voices or whatever else you were hearing here. With technology now they can center the vocals now and the instruments brought forward. Original Beatles pressings Paul's bass and Ringo's drumming are kinda buried in the background. Now we can bring them to the front. This was recorded in 1969 on an eight track board. I believe all The Beatles had until "The White Album" in 1968 were recorded on 4 track, that's all they had up to then. Here's what you want now, anything you do starting with the 1966 Lp "Revolver", 1967 Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band" Lp, 1968 "White Album", 1969 "Let It Be" and 1969 "Abbey Road" you want the 2017 thru 2022 remixes, they sound incredible. Forget the 2009 remasters. To confuse you a little further, in November, 2023 they released "The Beatles 1962-1966" and "The Beatles 1967- 1970" Lp's remixed. These were compilation double Lp's released in 1974. The new remixes both have a lot of bonus tracks on them and they sound incredible. This song is a bonus track on the 67-70 Lp. The only problem I have with 67-70 is aside from the singles and a few tracks from "Magical Mystery Tour" which for some reason hasn't been remixed yet, the majority of the tracks are just the remixes of the Lp's from 2017 to 2022. You want your mind blown? Go to the 1967-70 remix and listen to the single Lennon's "Strawberry Fields Forever", it will blow you away, sounds as weird and wonderful today as it did 57 years ago in 1967 when this song came over the radio. John was in his LSD faze on this one, it's incredible. Then the B-side, Paul's "Penny Lane" incredible! This is still widely regarded as the greatest single in the history of recorded music. These two songs are a great example of how diverse this band was. Also on the bonus disc on "Revolver" their 1966 single, Paul's "Paperback Writer" and John's "Rain". "Rain" is a "Must Listen". The first Beatles recording after John and George started taking LSD. Paul and Ringo weren't on board yet. This song has so many studio recording first's on it in history. The first backwards vocals and music on the outro at the end, it's really cool. Ringo's drumming is off the charts along with Paul's bass and John and George's heavy guitars sounds incredible. Remember now the 2022 remix of these. No one was making music like this in April, 1966. Then their August,1966 release of their "Revolver" was incredible. This Lp is one of the all time greats, check it out. Now on "Oh Darling" Paul got that raspy vocal by coming in an hour early or more for 5 days straight and belted it out on the piano until on that 5th day he was happy with it. That's what you call dedication to your craft. What you hear on that record is Paul's voice straight up, no BS enhancements. Also from "Abbey Road" must listens are John's "Come Together" George's "Something" which Billy Preston plays organ on. John's "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" which Billy Preston plays some incredible organ on and George's "Here Comes The Sun" which is The Beatles most played song on Spotify with as of August 2021 over 700 million plays and from what I hear around 900 million now. The remix of this also has a very nice video with it. This one should be kind of a must for you. Sorry for the long post but I've been a Beatles but since 1964. They are simply the greatest, most diverse and influential band in the history of recorded music and it ain't even close! The only other artist I would put up there on Beatles level would be Bob Dylan, the greatest American songwriter and poet of the 20th century. Hope this info is helpful for you. Peace ❤😢

[@paulcollins7185]

Listen all the way through man...?! There are not many covers of this Beatles original song written and sung solo by Paul McCartney. There are no support lead vocals IT IS ALL PAUL!!!

[@michaelbriefs9764]

Ease up on the stops, please!

[@MugnifyRTS]

Thats not the way I react Mikey

[@Jesus-cu6vn]

It’s a reaction my guy. He’s commenting on the song. You wanna just listen to the song put the vinyl on lol

[@michaelbriefs9764]

@@Jesus-cu6vn, no that is not what I am saying. I realize that he has to make some stops. He’s a reaction guy, I get that. But I’ve seen hundreds of them and this reactor is particularly prone to it, I would say excessively so. That’s all…just ease up on them. Maybe instead of 8 - 10 stops per song, how about 6? That sort of thing. That’s what I mean by “ease up”.

[@Dukish]

Sorry, I like a lot of the songs you play but I can’t deal with more than one stop, let alone a dozen stops. That’s no way to listen to a song. I wish I could subscribe but I know that it will be too annoying. No offense intended, just the honest truth.

[@MugnifyRTS]

none taken. we all have different ways we digest music

[@AnnieDC304]

It’s a reaction channel. If you want uninterrupted, why not just listen to the song? I’ve never understood comments like this. I find the best comments to be the ones that come in the moment.

[@mikejohnson7473]

This isn't Paul, it's a man named William Campbell.