I came here because a commentator on Järvi's rendition said this one is even wilder. It's true! If it's true that Mussorgsky threw all concepts of structure to the winds - which I can't really judge - then I love him for it!
@angelosilva40513 жыл бұрын
Unico e straordinario Abbado,versione originale assolutamente più interessante della versione Korsakov che appare in confronto addirittura banale e accademica.Grandissimi Abbado e i Berliner
@angelmendez66382 жыл бұрын
Me quedo con la de Rimsky al 100%
@cinemagraphymahivara2000 Жыл бұрын
For me too original version and arrangement by Modest is the best
@jochanaan583 жыл бұрын
It says something that Maestro Abbado preferred Mussorgsky's original to Rimsky-Korsakov's arrangement of this tone poem. This may seem more chaotic--but who's to say that wasn't Modest's intent?
@redcheckchill3 жыл бұрын
🤪💪
@DanielGarcia-fs5kk3 жыл бұрын
😦
@abbassaada95484 жыл бұрын
Basically no relation to the exciting version we have been listening to for, in my case , some 60 years. This sketchy version lacks the spooky and eerie atmospherics and lyricism of the established version which I could hum note for note. I couldn't discern the semblance of a tune in this video. I am glad this attempt was evidently discarded by , I assume, the composer.
@robkunkel88334 жыл бұрын
This was a version that was written by the composure and “discarded’” . It must be an interesting story.
@luigiquartucci58443 жыл бұрын
This is the original work by Mussorskji, not a ‘discarded’ version. The one you are used to is the rearrangement made by Rimskji Korsakov after M. death.
@abbassaada95483 жыл бұрын
@@luigiquartucci5844 In that case, kudos to Korsakov . I think he rescued the piece from imminent mediocrity, in my opinion.