Must ex Chief Justice of Supreme Court quit over Freedom of Expression Ruling? Lawyers say: "Yes!"

[@sirguyfawkes8702]

"When tyranny becomes law - resistance becomes duty" Thomas Jefferson.

[@TheInquisitorTV]

Exactly, we are on owe own, nothing in the establishment will support tge people, they are the enemy of the people. Revolution.....

[@patrickday4206]

If it's not just it's not law. Saint Augustine

[@magfan77]

Thinking of all the WW2 veterans and Dead soldiers that fought to keep Britain 🇬🇧 free from Tyranny. And Keep freedom of Speech alive so we could question Authorities. All ditched in the blink of an eye.

[@willek1335]

I hope people in UK do their duty to the fullest. Lead the way, and the world shall follow.

[@tonykennedy1615]

The sheep rolled over and even cheered on the totalitarian lockdowns. The "duty" was abdicated in favor of cowardice.

[@enkisdaughter4795]

He shouldn’t be allowed to resign - he should be dismissed.

[@beeble2003]

The only appointment he holds is as a judge on the Hong Kong appeals court. You appear to be saying that the Chinese government should fire him for ruling in their favour. Is that what you meant to say?

[@madmelwood3778]

Totally and utterlt

[@EdwardLindon]

The question you are responding to is whether English jurists should take part in the HK judicial system. Why would the Chinese want to dismiss him when he gives them the cover of credibility?

[@beeble2003]

@@EdwardLindon Right. It seems that the OP and the 166(!) people who liked their comment have completely misunderstood the situation.

[@noelward8047]

Politics has no place in administrating The Law.

[@REDLION0044]

This only reinforces my total lack of respect for the judicial system, and just about everything else.

[@benholroyd5221]

Yes, the off hand comment about DDJs ignoring precedent because the higher court 'got it wrong' got me. how the hell thats just an off hand comment, and not the judge getting, at minimum, a reprimand, I don't know.

[@Jack-fs2im]

amnesty international might help us

[@nonyadamnbusiness9887]

Good for you. The immoral deserve no respect.

[@P.G.Wodelouse]

@@Jack-fs2im they are a political party they only help their own

[@thomridgeway1438]

The Present Judicial System of Law in this country is a complex grift. It has always been designed as such, to allow power to a privileged few.

[@escapethematrix5069]

No one should ever be jailed for peaceful protest. This clown of a judge who is jailing onlookers is a disgrace.

[@patrickday4206]

You said jailed but what about less minor punishments?

[@adamsmith6594]

Present at a demonstration which turns into a riot in which they were present but did nothing to aid it should be a "are you OK sir" and move over here to keep you safe. If that has ended up in a sentence then there should be serious consequences for the judge. Onlooking is covered on the met polices own website and sates you can, you can't be removed and no officer can stop you from filming an incident.

[@super_happy_alien509]

No one has been Jailed for a peaceful protest

[@stormy3446]

@@super_happy_alien509 ???

[@madmelwood3778]

​@@adamsmith6594yep

[@Patrick-yk9jd]

When judges start to do what they are told (even though they may disagree with what they are told to do) instead of what the law says it is time for them to retire

[@stevemartin7464]

Yes I agree.

[@SG-wx8zm]

Where are all the bloody human rights lawyers??

[@TheOwlsarewatching606]

mosque?

[@becantonopoulos2604]

Defending the “refugees”

[@poco9964]

permission to protest is surely an oxymoron?

[@tim2024-df5fu]

The vast majority of countries in the world don't have free speech. They only thought they did because the USA government leaned on them about it. The US government has reversed it's opinion of free speech under the Dems so you're seeing the world as it actually is vs how the USA wanted it to be.

[@markhorton8578]

No not for large scale protests, for public safety and to avoid disorder. The police can close down roads for marches etc.

[@workdevice7808]

​@@markhorton8578That just makes it cosplay!!

[@terryboland3816]

No. Not an oxymoron.

[@ziggarillo]

I don't think you understand either " oxymoron" or "protest" 😂

[@christineprior6418]

Another reason as to why I no longer trust the justice system.

[@Jack-fs2im]

@@christineprior6418 yes and why aren,t Amnesty involved

[@Raven4508]

Or the police...

[@EdwardLindon]

The justice system in Hong Kong?

[@phillipgriffiths9624]

If there was any justice, Blaire and Campbell would be behind bars.

[@super_happy_alien509]

For What ?

[@rememberme3852]

And Kneeling Starmer.

[@damianbutterworth2434]

@@super_happy_alien509 starting an illegal war because a Taxi driver told him too.

[@KeithChegwin24]

@@super_happy_alien509 There was that little thing called the Iraq invasion and a 45 minute lie which led to 100s of 1000s being killed, millions displaced, the introduction of Jihadi terrorism to the West at the same time as instructing Barbara Roche to open up the borders which inevitably led to Brexit, grooming gangs and the disruption we see today across the West. Not a biggie though.

[@Daisyworld743]

When our courts are at their limits, we can outsource the show trials to Hong Kong, and rent prison space in Siberia.

[@DJWESG1]

dont give them ideas ffs

[@adammoss5284]

In SiberIa you’d need a Winter Fuel Payment.

[@OrwellsHousecat]

Seek asylum in siberia

[@Tailhook69]

Good call...

[@belindared3389]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@tezrh]

Watching your Judges demonstrate complete distain and contempt for those brought before them, was sickening. Making up law and sentencing based on a perfect hatred for those 'below or beneath them'. Months in confinement for 'anti-establishment' thoughts and communicating those thoughts is tyranny.

[@tonyfincham6126]

These judges are carrying out political orders & now political courts giving out political sentences to put us in fear of being

[@susannemac2800]

it used to be simple dont threaten the Monarch.

[@TheOwlsarewatching606]

violence was committed. Was there sufficient time for the arrestees to get proper legal advice. Why were the sentences in some instances so draconian. This was score settling by the Left

[@larx4074]

I have noticed that Human rights have not been invoked in any of these recent cases.................

[@TheOwlsarewatching606]

maybe they should be though. Length of sentences in some cases is extreme

[@helenporter7584]

Informing the authorities for a march is only mandatory for the majority group! Minority groups appear to be exempt!

[@benhamilton5692]

Parliament and the Judiciary should be separate and independent not in bed with each other. Further there should be criminal offences made to keep them apart.

[@charliesmithers7663]

Blair to thank again

[@neilmckechnie6638]

Tell that to Scottish People, where there is no Rule of Law, only the rule of lawyers.

[@bobfry5267]

The right to protest is inviolable by any law, and does not depend upon the permission of any power. All that remains is the quality of the response.

[@markmcintyre9893]

Where in the law does it state that?

[@khankrum1]

The Judges should be in the Dock!

[@chrisbrown3278]

Section 5 of the public order act speaks of threatening , abusive or insulting words and behaviour . Such a law is always open to opinion and should be applied using common sense taking into account freedom of speech and the rights of an individual to peacefully state his or hers opinion in a free democratic society . Has something changed in our country ?

[@gurglejug627]

yes. The police and courts have become even more subject to political dictat and the police even thicker and less trained as good officers leave in dismay.

[@patavinity1262]

It's always the way when it comes to free speech. People are happy to dismantle it when it comes to suppressing those opinions they don't like, and very unhappy when the same law is used to suppress their own opinions. It puts me in mind of the famous scene in 'A Man for All Seasons': "I'd cut down all the laws of England to get at the Devil." "And when the Devil turns round to face you, where will you hide, the laws being all flat? ... I would give the Devil the benefit of law, for my own safety's sake."

[@ph8077]

Reminds you...or Christopher Hitchens?

[@barrysheridan9186]

A good quote from a fine film.

[@patavinity1262]

@@ph8077 Pardon?

[@Trebor74]

​@@ph8077 Churchills quote is better - "Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage."

[@patrickday4206]

Or “better ten guilty men go free than one innocent man be imprisoned”

[@streaky81]

Thrown in prison for taking part in a peaceful protest, good job that doesn't happen in the UK. Oh, wait..

[@nickjung7394]

It is only a matter of time before those in the judiciary are called to account for their judgements in the same way that the Post Office management have!

[@TheOwlsarewatching606]

I'm afraid not. A lot has led up to this..

[@pippipster6767]

His Lordship’s reputation was trashed at the Post Office enquiry. And due to special treatment, he didn’t even have to give evidence.

[@abum4595]

I'm always shocked when I find out that judges can basically make up the law as they go along and can basically come to any conclusion they like in any context based on their own prejudice.

[@FaanBoerseun]

'More politics than law'. 100%.. The legal profession has decided to be lapdogs to politicians and will eventually pay the price.

[@dibqip]

There are a large number of senior judges in the uk that are rather compromised with regards to traditional British values on freedom.

[@Matty12333]

It will rebound eventually on Keir and these judges

[@jeannineterran2621]

Oh I hope so.

[@gonnabeok.]

@Matty12333......oh God ....i Do hope so.

[@stew21000]

If the courts are so quick to sentence why could they not do a quick test appeal and on to the Supreme Court, to see if a prime minster is allowed to do what he has done.

[@infrasleep]

As ever, it all boils down to Blair. Usually ONE criminal justice bill is passed every TEN years. Blair passed FIFTY (that's 500 years worth) all unscrutinised. It is actually technically impossible to be law abiding in the UK and Blair's gift to his beloved legal chums is that THEY-rather than an elected accountable government-can make up the law ;everything is up for a judicial review as Blair has left a trail of ambiguous laws-more muddied by the ECHR which he enshrined in the UK . Going out with your 5 and 6 year old kids/grand kids? Buy them some chips ? A seagull attacks! You swat the bird away! GUESS WHAT???!!! You've committed a CRIME under Blairs countryside criminal justice bill and the Lawyers are celebrating ££££££ Why ? Found guilty JUDICIAL REVIEW!!!! (££££) Surely you are entitled to defend your kids/ Found not guilty ? JUDICIAL REVIEW!!!!(££££) The law clearly states this is a crime! History will totally damn Blair and the VAST damage he's done. The pity is he will escape his deeds during his lifetime.

[@MervynPartin]

You are spot on. Regrettably, he probably will escape justice.

[@Bristolcentaurus]

and the Tories did what? why did they not repeal these laws? are the Tories so incompetent they cant organise a bill to repeal these unfair laws? whose fault s it these laws are still on the books? the Tories of course.

[@BarbaraHardacre]

​@@MervynPartinall politicians escape justice

[@Book-Mark]

A truly evil man.

[@susanshadrake6193]

Blair has been, and still is, a blight on this nation. And his wife has made a ton of money out of his legislative spree.

[@kelvinpell4571]

"THE PARTY TOLD YOU TO REJECT THE EVIDENCE OF YOUR EYES AND EARS. IT WAS THEIR FINAL AND MOST ESSENTIAL COMMAND" George Orwell - 1984

[@patrickday4206]

Room 101 for you 😂

[@msmrepo3271]

Sounds to me that he is incapable if making reasoned judgments for whatever reason. Sack him its dangerous to have judges like this..and those you mentioned in county courts who ignore vertical and horizontal stare decisis.

[@laurapearson3370]

Compromised perhaps?

[@msmrepo3271]

@@laurapearson3370 Yes

[@anonimushbosh]

Copying the Americans by renaming our top court the Supreme Court could have been the beginning of the end for Britain’s self esteem.

[@stickinthemud23]

Love that he’s doing this without a Teleprompter. Those are always the best videos.

[@DoubleBogeyHal]

How can you have a free society where you can theoretically have your political opponents thrown in jail because a political speech or debate answer they don't like offended them?

[@twistedsister2568]

Starmer has crossed the line as have the judiciary. They are giving custodial sentences where they have stated no crime has been committed but Starmer has said they must be sent aced for being there. Overreach in the extreme and we need a legal challenge, where are all the lawyers waiting to take this on and make a name for themselves.

[@michaelcorbett4236]

Just wasting tax payers money and then they'll waste even more money on the Miscarriage of Justice trials and inquiry

[@larx4074]

Total human rights violations.....................

[@arfurascii2232]

"They are giving custodial sentences where they have stated no crime has been committed" - please provide names of such cases.

[@JamesKerr-z4o]

The judiciary interpret and apply the laws passed by parliament. Kier has not introduced any laws in this area, and he can’t influence judges. The laws being used were implemented by the Conservative government.

[@abuelafromhell]

Starmer should not be influencing the judges opinion in any way. He had to stand down as prosecutor when he decided to go into politics and has no place influencing any sentences the judges give out. This is a major overstep imo. I'm sure this can not be legal. Plus, since when did people get locked up for a first offence? Posting on social media or retweeting a post on X. The law truly is an ASS.

[@RIp-sz6yn]

The Chinese providing free internet joke was subtle to the point I almost missed it.

[@NeverBelieveALie]

Is this an early morning Legal Ramble ramble?! Thanks as ever Alan! Sherlock Holmes is proud of You for shining your legal light 🌞 #JusticeForJessKaur

[@nickpricey8689]

I need to get out of Birmingham. Waste in my life in this dump of a city.

[@Talktruthdontbescared]

Love these stories 👍

[@darrenupton5500]

We have the best justice system in the world if you can afford it.

[@TheDripSpotter]

This Labour Government will Fall and a General Election be called. There is no other way out of this total mess. This needs to happen and soon.

[@WinstonSmithGPT]

You don’t seem to know how your government works. You’re stuck with stalinists for a long time.

[@TheDripSpotter]

@@WinstonSmithGPTNot sure about that Sunshine.

[@tom5216]

Who else would people vote for anyway. Not one party in the UK is trustworthy and that includes Reform. We are one sick country.

[@doloreswylie3067]

Why are so many many people talking about the state of our Country and nobody changing the landscape. We have so much to be thankful for, our scenery, our culture, our inclusive humanity and we are letting that rush downhill and NObody seems to be capable of halting our decline. How far will it go before someone , somewhere brings this madness to an end.

[@odoggow8157]

😂

[@ChrisJJames56]

You can jail offenders but that won't change the opinion of a large proportion of the population.

[@FairladyS130]

British lawyers should be protesting in the UK. Why aren't they?

[@super_happy_alien509]

Protest What ?

[@FairladyS130]

@@super_happy_alien509 Draconian laws with more planned against free speech for a start. You are happy about that situation?

[@FairladyS130]

@@super_happy_alien509 You don't know what's happening as is being discussed here. Your problem.

[@super_happy_alien509]

@@FairladyS130 again protest what ?. not to point it out we using freedom of speech to talk now. So again Protest What ?

[@FairladyS130]

@@super_happy_alien509 I'll spell it out for you. Against laws that have heavy penalties for victimless crimes compared with physical injury crimes, against judges who don't restrict their considerations to those unique to the matter before them, against laws that are ambiguous, against laws that place a heavy emphasis on protecting government often at the expense of individual freedom, against laws that restrict freedoms and are created in regard to a problem which does not exist. There is more but I'm wasting my time here.

[@andrewgilbertson5356]

Thank you very much Al.

[@gazebo1357]

Well spotted , I missed that but yes bang on with the subtle barb😎

[@alexroc172]

Does the right to protest come under Freedom of Expression? What about peacefully attending protests where a small minority become verbally abusive to the police?...do the peaceful protesters have protection in law or are they guilty by association? As in the recent televised court proceedings on the anti illegal immigration protests. One further point....does the broadcasting of the judge's reasoning after the incident provide adequate justification for his sentencing, that all those present were guilty, even though innocent bystanders would definitely not have been aware of the possibility of this ruling?

[@arfurascii2232]

"Does the right to protest come under Freedom of Expression?" - that and Article 11, Freedom of Assembly and Association. "do the peaceful protesters have protection in law or are they guilty by association" - in principle they are not guilty by association. If you're referring to a real case, please name it.

[@patrickday4206]

No it is a natural right born into every living human maybe they acknowledge it under the freedom of expression but far deeper concept.

[@TheOwlsarewatching606]

the judge I saw was clesrly relishing his role.

[@EdwardLindon]

You mean the murderous racist riots?

[@ricardoospina5970]

The right to protest should be something that all sides agree on, because sooner or later, you will be on the bottom and you want to protest what you think is wrong. Not supporting that is stupid and short sighted.

[@achitophel5852]

The courts will be debating how many angels can dance on a pin-head next. Meanwhile clear cut offences - the grooming atrocities continue to be held up in the back log.

[@karltaylor7378]

Yes. Fire him. Impartiality has been taken away from judges.

[@markborner291]

Very interesting as always and lovely view of Mawgan Porth!!!

[@phyllislovelace8151]

Thank you for this interesting piece, much appreciated

[@ravenwing8842]

What an interesting discussion! It does undermine my faith in the legal system though, for it seems that the law can be pulled either way and justice isn’t always served. Lovely walk in North Cornwall. 😃👍

[@milo2324]

Great video! Thank you!

[@davidb8539]

I love these videos. I often form an opinion on something without realizing the counterpoints that have been thrashed out in the past and sometimes seemingly unreasonable decisions suddenly make a lot more sense

[@anitahornbrook745]

Beautiful part of the world.! A feast for the eyes and the mind x

[@JoBloggs-e5b]

How can the English riot victims jailed recently appeal their sentences? They have had an unfair trial in both being convicted as an example and having it done so quickly. Not giving them time to submit an affidavit or other evidence.

[@gwenlillianlondon3772]

I have the impression that most of them were encouraged to plead guilty, just like the postoffice scandal re Horizon.

[@susanshadrake6193]

Yes, 'encouraged' is right. The legal system in this country is broken.

[@arfurascii2232]

If they pleaded guilty (most if not all did) then there was no trial, there was a sentencing hearing. If they pleaded guilty at the first opportunity they would have got a third off their sentence. They would have made statements intended to reduce their sentence (e.g. this is my first offence, I'm normally a law-abiding person, I have dependents or I'm a carer etc). If they did their crime during disorder or riot and they were associated with it or seen to encourage it then they would tend to be treated more severely than if they committed the same offence in more orderly circumstances. If they can show grounds their sentence was manifestly excessive then they can appeal. The procedure depends on whether they were sentenced at magistrates court or Crown Court.

[@TheOwlsarewatching606]

maybe some typeof "class action".

[@markmcintyre9893]

They’ve plead guilty. Freely.

[@jupo9928]

Beautiful views!

[@JAYJAY-lb7jz]

I believed in the judiciary, however since KS has stemmed the freedom of expression and instructed all the English judges to disproportionately punish U.K. residents for making comment. I now know the judiciary are no longer reliably independent from the government.

[@EdwardLindon]

The comment of burning down hotels with people inside, or the comment of setting up colour bar roadblocks?

[@TerryTerryTerry]

When freedom needs to be written in law it is not freedom. Me.

[@saraSara-ns3te]

Love your videos. Thank you for such an enjoyable legal ramble!!!

[@liaminwales]

One of my friends from Uni was from HK, he was relay not happy with the new management. Talking to him just pushed my views to be bias of not liking the new HK gov, over the years he told me how things got harder.

[@Miz-l2c]

Wow, fabulous views thanks for the walk really enjoyed it. This subject is new to me. However, if the other judges have quit, for what they believe is good reason, then I go with this. Overall, I don’t like what he is doing and would vote ‘yes’ to quit. Listening to this, reminds me of ‘Wild Swans’ - good autobiographical book, three generations of Chinese women living through the revolution. Once read, never forgotten.

[@clewis4744]

Yesterday I joined the Free Speech Union, if anyone believes in Free Speech and can afford to join i think they should seriously consider supporting the Free Speech Union. I never thought I'd need to do this but this government is oppressive.

[@Lightning613]

Rights are inalienable. otherwise, they’re just temporary permission slips from the grantor.

[@ianmangham4570]

Its called LAWFARE 😮

[@Richard-yd1ws]

I seem to recall Neuberger and Grabiner featured in the post office enquiry, having previously given advice to the Post Office

[@martyndawson7484]

Most amazing thing about this is how steady and level the camera is on the end of a stick.

[@jjab99]

I agree that people should have a right to protest, but should not impose that right on people by damaging art works, blocking roads and generally becoming a nuisance to people just trying to go about their daily lives. If your argument is valid and you present it well, people will agree and change can happen by peaceful means, but if you decide that the only way to get anyone to look at your argument is to break the law, then your argument is clearly too weak to gain any meaningful following. We live in a democracy and so the minority cannot force the majority to follow their beliefs just because they destroy art, block roads and smash windows. We all have a say in the running of this country and no one should have the right to make peoples' lives miserable, that's what politicians are for, so leave it to the professionals and chill out. Just my 2p worth. Have a nice day to everyone, Joe

[@stevemartin7464]

I agree with most of what you say, but at what point does it become the only way of resisting? If a goverment becomes dictatorial and refuses to listen, what do people do?

[@jjab99]

@@stevemartin7464 PANIC!!!

[@EdwardLindon]

And the whole problem lies in that "can" and the suggestion that civil rights movements are intrinsically rationally motivated reforms rather than challenges to power. Bentham argued for women's suffrage in 1818. Arguably, you couldn't ask for a weightier advocate, but it took over a century to achieve even partial suffrage, and violence was involved. When some suffragettes were sent to prison for breaking windows, Emmeline Pankhurst noted that male political agitators had resorted to violence to advance their civil rights throughout British history.

[@AdeleTheMancunian]

Thanks

[@artmedialaw]

Oh wow, thank you! But please, feel free to watch with no obligation. It's enough you have to sit through the adverts!

[@AdeleTheMancunian]

@@artmedialaw I love your work, I’ve got my family hooked too.. thanks!

[@movarvo1217]

Loverly place, loverly chat with no boats in the background🎉

[@thedirectorschair1054]

"I don't know why people are always badmouthing the Chinese Government. They gave me an app on my phone that gave me free internet..." You cannot be this naïve. Please tell me you cannot be this naïve.

[@ryanwisbey3387]

With out question. If we cannot Express our fears as indiginous people against the establishment then questions need to be asked. The same questions that need to be asked on how Starlin Starmer got SC clearance by GCHC.

[@brettharter143]

Sc Clearance is pretty low on the clearance levels

[@super_happy_alien509]

Problem if you ask Dumb questions you get Dumb replys.

[@Wee_Langside]

Just because you don’t like what I'm saying that doesn't mean I'm wrong.

[@moyaingram7166]

Depends on 'which particular coat' thee or me, happens to be wearing at any given time ...

[@frankspeakmore7104]

Every single institution in the UK is broken. Post office, policing, immigration, NHS, education, justice system, politicians, religion, BBC, housing, railways, roads, employment. Prison sentences for tweets? Harsh fines maybe, but prison sentences because two tier Keir demands it? How on earth has it come to this?

[@steverooke1717]

It's been going on since Thatcher and it don't matter which way you vote🍻👍

[@DanIngham]

Soon UK citizens will be able to seek refuge in a better more developed country that is safe.

[@johnsmith-de9wv]

When you say safe ,do you mean when the russians are beaten and we can all go to ukraine?

[@odoggow8157]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@ArjayMartin]

Look up judges losing Judicial Immunity for inferior courts in Australia. High Court Case Judge Vasta.

[@Dangerousdaze]

"...we don't have any planes for them", except for the 40 aircraft, each.

[@Matt_The_Hugenot]

Northern Ireland Abortion Services was an exclusion to the right to protest to protect other rights. It shouldn't be used to generally suppress protest. The whole point of protest is that it is disruptive and inconveniences others, that's why it's protected. The only reasons for limiting it are firstly if other offences are committed in the act of protest and even then courts should be the aebiters in each case, or secendly if the protest directly harms other's rights, typically privacy, conscience, and speech.

[@jesspeak7543]

That was so very interesting and the scenery sublime. Thank you for taking us along on your walk.You are very knowledgeable and make topics very easy to follow. ❤😂 🇦🇺

[@geocachingwomble]

You would be surprised how many solicitors abandon your case because they don't want to do the work for you to actually defend you properly. I was on legal aid at one point and i had to get a judge to transfer counsel as my solicitor screwed up i had to get my original counsel that moved firms back. Solicitors can and do throw cases if they don't want to work with disabled people out of spite. It happened to me. I love my current solicitors though. I have 5 firms on speed dial for different kinds of litigation of i should ever need them in a professional capacity. All really incredible specialists in their fields. A good solicitor is like gold dust. Once you find one keep them

[@stigmontgomery7901]

So what are you doing so regularly that you potentially need the services of 5 solicitors?

[@anonimushbosh]

@@stigmontgomery7901 Contract law specialist to sue 1st law firm for quitting. Libel specialist to sue 1st law firm for angry outburst about client. Personal injury firm to sue 1st law firm for mental distress. Criminal firm - defence for attacking ‘rude’ solicitor.

[@lindsayheyes925]

But keeping 5 seems a bit like stalking...

[@geocachingwomble]

@@lindsayheyes925 in my family though. I am the most disadvantaged since I never finished my degree and got everything through industry equivalents. 17 years later I am still one qualification away from qualifying for my specific career subspecialty training in the job I want to get paid for.

[@geocachingwomble]

​@@stigmontgomery7901 it kind of happens when you are related to multiple high court judges that happen to be your aunts. I didn't count them in the list though nor did I count my cousin that is a trainee official solicitor in London

[@WastedPot]

God I wish those revolutionaries would have followed the Brits back and liberated us all from the crown.

[@johnsmith-de9wv]

If things get really bad then the crown will have the last say

[@Lightning613]

🤣😂👍

[@EdwardLindon]

You make a curiously American mistake with the unreal counterfactual. A British English speaker would have written "I wish they HAD".

[@philwilson56]

Very entertaining..amazing coast.Thanks.

[@Max-ht9hf]

These fast tracked prosecutions are ‘politically’ motivated therefore these are political prisoners!

[@EdwardLindon]

The motivation was to stop disorder and racist terrorism.

[@southerncomfortuk]

Nice office you’ve got there 🏝️😊. Very interesting video as always 🙏

[@lesleysaunders8088]

Thanks for your insight

[@damianbutterworth2434]

How shall we deal with these Nazi`s?

[@steveascension9626]

I used to think the English were a very smart and strong race, and their royalty was the wisest and most respected in the world because of their long history. But with all this mass migration landing on their shores from the Middle Eastern regions and their economic woes and riots in many cities, England has become a basket-case nation of the first order, possibly heading into the history books of failure and oblivion. Unless? Weeping with righteous outrage at this infringement on free expression, the demonstrators overthrew the establishment. There have been several uprisings in England's history. It can be wishful thinking to claim that it won't happen again.

[@Book-Mark]

It won't. we are all to fat and lazy or indoctrinated.

[@juliecarne7706]

Well look at our government and our London mayor! That says it all!

[@arfurascii2232]

Literal racism.

[@WinstonSmithGPT]

@@arfurascii2232Yes, your left are viciously racist against the indigenous people of Britain.

[@vexzusdragon8556]

The art of law only applies when people obey or recognise it as a society.

[@TC-qd1zw]

They should all resign, bent as 9/- coins.

[@lynnedwards1727]

It looks like a great place to ruminate upon life!

[@jtrevm]

In the PO Iniquity - who the hell is this guy was my reaction to ex-LCJ N? His humility was stunning by it's total absence.

[@peterrees6335]

You don't need permission for a static protest.

[@staffofdagda6238]

So, a judge can never be removed from the bench/office

[@arfurascii2232]

Both Houses of Parliament can petition the monarch to remove a judge. This has only happened once - Sir Jonah Barrington, in 1830.

[@staffofdagda6238]

@@arfurascii2232 wow,only once.

[@TheVigilant109]

Very interesting and fantastic scenery as usual

[@alfreygreen]

My friend went to Bar School, I recall her dining so many times a year, to qualify. Do you still have to dine?

[@artmedialaw]

Sort of. They're called qualifying sessions now. So there can still be the dining part, but with a lecture afterwards. But sometimes you get QS points just for attending things without the dining element.

[@davyroberts6019]

There more of us that them time is now..

[@BarbaraHardacre]

Beautiful view

[@wendynicholss6886]

Where is Lord Sumption what does he have to say about all this??

[@AnthonyWeston-g6g]

Great show and watching your backdrop feeds my soul ….oh and very interesting content and therefore subscribed

[@markhutton6055]

Silent prayer is obviously not abusive to the public. Stopping traffic obviously IS.

[@kevinbillington9773]

The resurrection of Vasiliy Vasilievich Ulrikh, Stalins longest serving show trial judge.

[@legion162]

I've not got any idea about the case you are talking about, but I love the way you talk and explain things that the "common person" like me can follow and understand, without drifting into legalese. Found the video very interesting

[@artmedialaw]

I have no idea what I'm talking about either; I just enjoy the walks.