Mustang 4.6 Vs Mustang 5.0

[@skyeram]

Smoked so many 5.0s in my 4.6 and still had people telling me that the 50 was faster. Lol

[@cubano1389]

Love how the 225hp 5.0 keeps up with the 260hp 4.6 , the 5.0 superior lowend grunt always take the start but the 4.6 has more topend power , i dont hate the 2v 4.6s but if u ask me the 5.0 is just a better all around engine, simpler to work on, smaller size and dat torque, now a 4v 4.6 is a different monster.

[@jackrabbit7389]

Notice how the 5.0 Pushrods motor always get the initial Jump that’s that good ol pushrods torque.

[@xtreme3484]

Jarrod Edelen yea I was over revving it at the time too

[@cubano1389]

@punchmaster123 Well the 5.0s in 94-95 cobras are basically the same as a normal 5.0 but they came with gt40 cobra intake and gt40 heads along with 1.7 roller rockers and basically the same cam as a 5.0 GT, u can pretty much make a normal 5.0 a cobra 5.0 with just getting the gt40 heads off an explorer and an aftermarket cam with a better intake and u got a good little motor, ppl make around 260 to 295 rwhp with only those mods, and swaping heads in 5.0 is easy.

[@shoDOHC]

@MrKawolsky Well with all respect to the Ford Modular Line of 1996 and up, I must say that the 2011 5.0 would not have happened without the 4.6 Liter Mustang GT. And to go even further, the venerable 1985- 1993 Mustang 5.0 is what truly has created what the 2011 Mustang GT is. This is what has been brought to it's TRUE fans. A n/a stock Mustang GT that puts down 420 Plus HP stock. We are living in the best of times ]for Mustang performance. Soak it up! FORD LOVE FOREVER.

[@ImaOldPoop]

they weigh 27-2800 for the gts. and im not talking about u inside,, theres a reason stock foxes can almost hang with new edges even with 35 less hp and torque.. cuz they weigh a bit less

[@cubano1389]

@xtreme3484 True, a fox is lighter, but not by much when they are stock, specially hatchbacks, the hatchs is one heavy piece. But i pulled on my friends 99 with my 94 5.0 without any problem at all, we both have basically the same mods, hes is automatic and maybe thats why i pulled on him so bad.

[@BRENDAJASON1]

Damm the red one has the quad exhaust

[@xtreme3484]

LOL YES very retarded setup we actually changed it out for a set of magnaflows

[@NitroGadvRules]

@MrKawolsky if your talking about the 2011 5.0 it has more in common with the 4.6 than the old 5.0. it actually has nothing in common with the old 5.0 other than the number of cubes.

[@lowslo9287]

Only thing you're missing is the crowd

[@ImaOldPoop]

they can run mid 14s.. new edges can ran low 14s

[@cleven269]

Yeah I seen on here a lot of folks face the cam down like mid video miss half the race get just sound lol

[@cubano1389]

npi 4.6s (96-98 GTs) were slower than 5.0s so u prolly race people that are not even racing you then.

[@KingD1975]

Cameraman it saddens me to say YOUR FIRED!

[@cleven269]

Why is the cam down most of the video?

[@jeremyquevedo7045]

The camera is down half the time? Musta almost crashed half the time too xD

[@DailyTread]

I got up, made a sandwich, ate it, and watched a cat video on youtube in the time between the fox taking off and the new edge taking off.....

[@MrFire1967]

Ok a beafed up 4.6thunderbird would out race/drive/drag both of these, no nitro no turbo just heads intake and exhuast, all im sayin

[@MrFire1967]

Oh 1995 thunder bird, allwheel indy suspension

[@MrFire1967]

andy stone stock btw

[@kingcrimson234]

andy stone well it's the same damn motor. a beefed up 4.6 mustang would out race/drive/drag the thunderbird. what's your point? you like thunderbirds? noted.

[@TheSamplebridge]

the panther body Thunderbird. AKA the heavier Mustang.

[@xtreme3484]

also stock for stock they do not keep up with new edge gts. this gt was stock intake and flowmasters.... woooptie dooo.

[@towrxter]

Cool.

[@ImaOldPoop]

because it foxes weigh 400lbs less.. shave 400lbs off the new edge and see wha t happens.. plus foxes look like a kids first car. he wants something fast but has no money

[@TurboTurdBurglar]

Bob Smith no. It’s about 150-250 pound difference I weighed my Foxbody at 3100 pounds and my new edge was 3300

[@FlashPoint345]

my infiniti G35 coupe all stock will smoke both these. i beat Gt all the time easy. nissan v6 engines are no joke

[@FlashPoint345]

+xtreme3484 well i beat gt here not sure what u feed them over there

[@FlashPoint345]

+xtreme3484 mine is a 2005 and im not lying the 99 to 2004 gt are slow as hell. i beat my friend 2003 gt and i also beat a 2006 gt. G35 are very quick for a v6

[@FlashPoint345]

+Adolf Hitler you a jealous liar. i have friends with 2002 and 04 i beat them in my g35 all the time. keep hating sore loser

[@FlashPoint345]

+Adolf Hitler ha yah jealous. never compare shit ford to an infiniti. ford cheap piece of junk. garbage. stay bitter

[@FlashPoint345]

+Adolf Hitler ya no one is buying it. ford is cheap junk so get over it. enjoy ur cheap car loser

[@817ricky82]

I think your friend wanted somthing fast and bought something slow.

[@TeamNCR2012]

nice race but the 5.0 suck my 98 gt all stock just have 373 gear and i kill them all the time. even the ones that have shit in them.lol but hell i dont even no what even in this car cuz i did not know it had 373 gears till now.lol race any 5.0 out in fresno whats up.

[@mylilpony71]

@MrKawolsky 2011

[@chasen432]

Old 5.0 is OHV new 5.0 is DOHC

[@bartledoothisevening]

YEAH BUT HE CANT SHIFT THO

[@tbyrddagreat]

Eargasm

[@SVT_sleeper_4v]

And its CAMMED!!

[@casey7244]

Cant drive

[@jessecoleman4796]

Both of those cars are slow af!...I could take my old 3.8 v6 and bust both their asses...really ..

[@royressy9974]

AHA!