My Deposition of AI Officer Miller before the real Miller at Trial -Natchitoches, Louisiana

[@feedbackphil7703]

Get ready too hear objection a million times .

[@Brrrap743]

The AI said it right there. they rely on the people that they work with and their training to enforce the law, but if everybody on the force is relying on everybody else that pretty much means nobody's actually reading and adhering to the law. And it is obvious to us, the public.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Right. AI knows the pattern

[@robertmcdonald9280]

Sorry I think you are going to fail at your trial. Good luck 👍

[@wintron]

Travis, I wish you the best but I hope you are going to learn how not to ask questions in a leading or accusatory manner. Watch some lawyers like on Deliberate Indifference Wisconsin conducting depositions. ..just you being angry, right?, You were thinking..., You were letting your emotions rule you?, these types of questions will not help you in your pursuit of justice whatsoever. I realize you are not in the position to take on a costly legal defence but please don't go in with this type of an approach. You deserve to win your case and have your rights upheld but your approach has to be on getting the legal questions and proper foundations set not by asking emotional questions. Best of luck tto you Travis

[@Exchange_IDs]

I told chatgpt to turn my original questions into bad ones that clearly should be objected to.

[@bryanjellison2490]

I'm starting to believe Ai helps cops answer questions because, Ai answers sounds like exactly what a cop says during their depositions😮

[@exploreraa983]

Just remember that you cannot ask leading questions on direct exanimation. You have to ask questions to make them say what you want. You may only lead a witness during cross. There are some really good trial lawyers with youtube videos that give advice for examination questions, you might check them out when you get time. Don't get too confident with the AI, its good practice, but you dont have opposition, and a real witness is not as eager to please you. Can you ask AI to be a more hostile witness? or offer objections as a prosecutor might?

[@pigtrader2053]

That's not true when you're questioning an adverse witness. Defense counsel can go straight to leading questions. In fact, Travis should only be asking leading questions, and he should only ask questions when he 1) knows the true answer, and 2) can prove it.

[@exploreraa983]

@@pigtrader2053 His title indicates these are deposition questions, not cross-examination. there is a difference. Many of his questioning lines are either complex, speculative, and argumentative. I think he needs to adapt his form to better suit a Louisiana judge, who is going to be very protective of the officer, and is not likely to declare an officer as a hostile witness.

[@pigtrader2053]

@@exploreraa983 My mistake. I didn't take "deposition" seriously because Travis is not going to get to depose Miller. And I agree on your assessment of the questions. To be more harsh: None of the questions have any value. But it was a good exercise in seeing that the AI was pretty darn good in answering questions without allowing Travis to gain any ground.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Yeah, I just told chatgpt to make my original questions easy to object to for this video.

[@exploreraa983]

@@Exchange_IDs the majority of us here, Travis, are on your side. Nothing but support, crossed fingers, and well-wished for you.

[@EricFarmer01]

Travis sounds like an AI.

[@earl9673]

Don't you think these cops and prosecutors are watching your vids?

[@exploreraa983]

I'm sure they are... it's like a football team showing their competitor their play book. But he doesn't seem to care. He replied to my cautionary statement to this effect on another video. I wish him the best of luck. It's misfortunate he cannot get an attorney, the law is actually on his side, but the law in Louisiana can be weird, and it does not favor the citizen.

[@xandertree]

I think the video might be a sort of parity. I suspect he's only making this video, and others, in jest. It's a kind of cognitive dissonance, and like civil disobedience. It's a kangaroo justice system

[@bryanneedham7758]

Criminal cops will walk free !!!

[@megagatvol]

Travis I’m a huge fan of yours but how does one go against the government that has an answer for everything ??.

[@evanscreekbrahman7511]

I was getting spiffed up for the big Premiere!

[@jaimhaas5170]

My man Brahm....Merry Xmas and happy New Year.

[@evanscreekbrahman7511]

@ I heard Sarah Connor’s is not at all pleased to see T-bone sucking up to ChatGPT! Good to hear from you pal!

[@jaimhaas5170]

@@evanscreekbrahman7511 oh man....those movies R STILL my favorite of all time. Give me ARNIE or give me death. Hang in there old friend. I hope we can get T through this challenging southern strife.

[@garcdonald]

T: ask simple, direct questions. I don't like you making assertions in your questions. Don't insult him. Use irony. What did you think? Is it policy to turn on body camera? etc. The appendix of your uniform?? But i like your approach to flush every angle out. Very sharp.

[@Exchange_IDs]

I can't use the real questions for the video. It would help the prosecution.

[@exploreraa983]

It's not WHAT you are asking.... but it's HOW you are asking them.... might not get past the Judge... Objection, Leading Objection, calls for speculation Objection, compound question Objection, relevance Objection, argumentative

[@music77309]

Leading questions are only prohibited on direct examination. All questions on cross examination typically *should* be leading, in fact normally start with "Isn't it true that..."

[@wilmerwalton5089]

I think your use of AI is admirable, and you're definitely on the right track. But, I've never heard so many leading questions in such a short period. I can hear the stream of objections from the prosecutor now. You can't put words in the mouth of the witness and loaded questions should be carefully used, if at all. You must have a followup question ready for each response, that propels you to the answer you're seeking. You're playing multi-level chess, not checkers. If you can tell the AI when to switch levels, it can tell you what move to make. Get it's help with follow-up questions. The DA will be playing his AI against your AI. The witness will have canned answers given by the DA.

[@Exchange_IDs]

I had chatgpt turn all my original questions into something that could be objected to for this video

[@megagatvol]

Travis…you’re farting against thunder against these tyrants.

[@Exchange_IDs]

I would simply leave the state and forget about it but then they put me in the NCIC like I'm some kind of escaped slave from their state.

[@fosterkennel649]

Personally I do not and will never talk to AI and sadly run into this crap AI dealing with companies, and I always demand a real person, and I am sure I'm not alone in these thoughts.blessings

[@evanscreekbrahman7511]

Spiffed!

[@Renegade666-y1j]

At the end of the day ,I get, standing up for our rights, but if you have nothing to hide and just wanna get on with your day without getting hassled or going to jail what's the point of standing your ground when all we have to do is show our ID? Most cops don't care about our rights. Putting torcher cuffs on and taking us to jail for no reason. Just show your ID and get on with your day. What a waste of your life. These issues are never ever going to change. Lol.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Whats my driving infraction in a library?

[@exploreraa983]

NO- change is possible... if every citizen knew and stood up for their rights, policing would be very different in this country.... they do it because they can get away with it. Just look at Irizary vs Yehia... it can be done pro se! But it takes a lot of work.

[@OurSimpleAdventures]

You should have it play you and you play Miller. See what questions it would ask.

[@SABOARITI]

I would ask officer Miller very specific questions. You are being too general. Include only 1 questio

[@libertine5606]

Adding in his narrative and all other information may really find holes and inconstancies. Put all information by all "witnesses" and who provided the information. That would be cool! I know that attorneys that I have used have found things that I wouldn't have noticed before.

[@marcusthomas6998]

To tyrants everything is suspicious.