My new Tamron 150-600mm Lens is Terrible!

I bought a new Tamron 150-600mm lens for wildlife photography. But after the first photo shoot, I could tell something was very wrong. In this video I show how I tested the lens using the Datacolor SpyderLENSCAL autofocus calibration aid in the hopes of fixing the problem by setting autofocus micro-adjustments.
Do you own the Tamron 150-600mm lens? I'd love to hear your feelings about the lens and if you are happy with the results, especially for wildlife photography.
Of course, there are many things that can cause a photo to be out of focus. You shouldn't go blaming the lens immediately! Here are some things to check first:
annemckinnell....
Here's a link to the Datacolor SpyderLENSCAL:
amzn.to/2WD3Sx6
Tamron 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2:
amzn.to/2WyTvdA
*********
Sign up for my newsletter and receive 3 free photography eBooks:
annemckinnell.c...
More tips, tutorials, and stories about my ongoing nomadic adventure on my website: annemckinnell.com
*********

[@annemckinnell]

*UPDATE* A few months ago I purchased a used Canon 500mm F4L and it is wildly superior to the Tamron lens I had. I get consistent super sharp photos. It cost a fair bit more than the Tamron, but the results are worth it. To me, any amount spent on a lens that does not give consistent sharp results is too much. I had two copies of the Tamron and the second replacement lens was also very poor but it behaved differently than the first one. So I have no confidence in the quality control of the Tamron lens. I will say that about half of the people I talk to say their lens is excellent and the other half say their lens is terrible like mine. It's a coin toss. But I am much happier with my Canon 500mm that I know I can rely on.

[@annemckinnell]

The Canon lens is the Mk1. The Tamron lens was the G2.

[@jichen888]

It might caused by the camera body I guess.

[@annemckinnell]

@@canonlensesandcameras4425 I will! I find video is hard, even with the fluid gimbal, it's difficult to get smooth motion, but I guess that would be the same for all long lenses.

[@johnnysoderberg9693]

I have a Tamron 150-600 G2 and it is pure luck to get a sharp photo

[@johnnysoderberg9693]

@@canonlensesandcameras4425 auto focus stops working now and then, and sometimes when the object is in focus the auto focus gets it completely out of focus. My guess is, it doesn’t work very well with Eos R and the EF/RF adapter. Even when you know you have an object perfectly in focus the result is out of focus in the post, you can’t trust the lens so you need to take like 5-10 shots and hope some is in focus. I have never had any issues with Sigma or Canon lenses.

[@robertbascelli6433]

Mine works Great.

[@lastdaystravellastdaystrav2233]

like she said 50/50

[@xdrew707x]

Was the image stabilization on on the lens? When I shoot with my tripod I turn it off because I noticed I was getting blurry photos even at high shutter speed. I turn it on when I just use hand held and I get crisp shots. This lens is wonderful.

[@FrankyboyLegend]

I shoot handheld and find I best turn it off for high shutter speeds (>1/1000) or use mode 2 (panning) but often I don't have the time to do so. They should have just added panning detection on mode 1 as I find it unassuring when the viewfinder isn't stabilized. I also find that the VC doesn't do well with bursts at low shutter speeds, adding smearing or softness in every few images (perhaps the moving VC element is adding some diffraction). I've also had an intermittent issue where VC fails when I keep spamming the half-press and the best way to fix this is to turn off my camera and re-mount the lens.

[@kiyoshim9593]

The samples she provided are out of focus, not blur.. the VR is ok

[@albertjackson8468]

@@kiyoshim9593 Not on a tripod it isn't, If she had the VR on, it will actually induce movement, especially at long range with a small target. Besides the fact that isn't exactly how you do a lens sharpness test, to begin with.

[@kiyoshim9593]

@@albertjackson8468 Lol. vr wont induce movement with that lens. havent you used that lens before?

[@trekgod3]

I have a Tamron 150-600mm 1st gen, it's been awesome. My 1st test with it was shooting my neighbor's car at the end of the street. When zoomed in 100%, I could read the lettering on his tires.

[@annemckinnell]

I wish my copy was like that!! It really sounds like there are good copies and bad copies.

[@riothero313]

My first test will be shooting my neighbors wife down the street ;)

[@riothero313]

@scott fisher Not "THE" perv.

[@riothero313]

@scott fisher I have the infamy, without the status.

[@whoweserve863]

I have the Tamron 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 and use on my D850. Have taken all over the country shooting motor sports, birds and wildlife in landscape. Never had an issue. Also have other Tamron lenses 70-200 and 15-30 for astrophotography and never an issue.

[@annemckinnell]

Well, I'm glad to hear it is working for some people. It seems like there are just a lot of bad copies out there, but if you get a good copy then it's really good!

[@keithhamilton216]

Shoulder strap for camera

[@IAmJustSaying6]

As a photojournalist, we were taught to use newspaper want ads to check out a new lens.

[@thesharpercoder]

You probably have a “bad” copy. Send it back for an exchange, if you want. Yes, I realize this video is old. However, your focus testing technique is highly flawed. You should be testing at 25-50x the focal length, not some random distance of your choosing. You want the test target to fill the frame. When I test super telephoto lenses, I use a target that is four feet across. Using the shutter delay was good. You should have also used mirror lockup. Mirror lockup canmake a big difference when testing at super telephoto focal lengths. I think you should have dialed in a shutter speed of at least 1/1000. You should also take at least 5-10 test shots at each focal length and distance, which you use to calculate an average result. If your multiple shots using the same focal length and distance are giving you results that are all over the place, then that should raise a red flag that you might be doing something wrong. You should have bought the docking port accessory. The software to talk to the lens includes focus testing procedures that tell you what focal lengths and distances to use.

[@davidfitzpatrick7399]

I bought the lens a week ago and my lens is great... have not even updated the firmware and shoots perfect.

[@jozaprazsky816]

The same to me.

[@guyfisher2050]

Doesn’t sound like you used mirror lockup which would introduce camera shake especially at high focal lengths. I recommend you use either mirror lockup or live view.

[@annemckinnell]

Oh, you're right, good catch! I should have done that. However, I was using pretty fast shutter speeds because it was a bright day so the photos still should have been okay. I forget about mirror lock up sometimes now because I use a mirrorless for my landscapes and with the DSLR it's all wildlife with the fast shutter speeds. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll be sure to do that next time.

[@nobbiestyles]

It makes no big difference. I have recently bought a tamron 100 400 and it has the same unbelievable problem. Same test with spyder lenscal, through the finder and then live view and an eos 90D. No way, it is really a kid's toy, but very expensive.

[@actie-reactie]

@@nobbiestyles what is the kids toy..... the 90D or tamron?

[@nobbiestyles]

@@actie-reactie tamron. The 90d works good with other lenses.

[@johnfairweather9188]

The majority of reviewers have no problem with focusing. Mine works perfectly.

[@Ichijoe2112]

Were many of these Reviewers of yours reviewing the original eleven Herbs, and Spices version of the Tamron 150-600 or the 150-600 G2? Enquiring minds wanna know!

[@johnfairweather9188]

@@Ichijoe2112 G2. I have never used the G1, which I understand was not as good. But I love this lens. Handheld it is amazing.

[@Ichijoe2112]

@@johnfairweather9188 I just picked one Up today, (Boy am I thankful for the full Weather sealing, got caught out in a few spring cleaning sprinkles.) But, I think I need to get this calibrated. Kinda surprised at how sharp overall this lens (or at least my copy.), seems to be out of the box. But I need to figure my Shutter Speed out to freeze 'em. 1/8000s at F6.3 leaves me to underexposed. At 1/60s I get the light. But, than the motion blur as well. *150-600 SP VC DI G2

[@stevemurnan1702]

Had one of the G2's and wasn'tever happy with it. Tried AFMA calibration using the Spyder and Focal software. I never managed to get it sharp and the focus was inconsitent ranging between front and back focus without any good reason. I sent it back and was glad to see the back of it.

[@annemckinnell]

Yup, that's exactly what happened to me. Glad it's gone!! Thanks for your feedback, it's good to know I'm not the only one :)

[@akaMoonrat]

I've been using the older version of this lens for some time now and I've had great results. I would assume that considering you have the G2, it would be even better, and that's what I've heard from anyone else who uses it. You must have gotten a faulty lens, so you should try to get a replacement.

[@charlierivera5725]

I am using a Nikon Z6 with the this lens and is sharp from 150 to 600. I am sure she bought a defective lens. I love this lens

[@robertcarey3383]

Buy quality and only cry once, buy cheap and cry every time you use it.

[@annemckinnell]

My favourite comment yet!! Thanks Robert ❤️

[@joeyyambor9350]

Good point and way to put it actually...

[@Ichijoe2112]

Yeah because everyone has a spare 10K down the back of their Sofa? Not everyone wants to cosplay as some papayatzee creeper. I don't quite get your story, but if there is a way of living of wildlife Bird Photography, or just plain Photography in general, I haven't discovered such muses myself, yet. It's not a bleeding life, or death career to most People, it's just a hobby. As Carlin once said, Interests are quite free, Hobbies cost Money. But, hobbies aren't your full time job either.

[@georgedavall9449]

Oh so very original there robbie

[@gordonyoung1970]

Not necessarily so. I bought this G2 version for going on an African safari. I was in a small group of 7, within the group were the Sigma Sport version and the cheaper Sigma version plus 2 Canon 100-400 mk 1. Each night we viewed on a 27in Imac. The team leader would mix the photos up so nebody new which photographer took any shot. As we were in either 1 or 2 jeeps and had to stick to the roads, so many photos were similar as we were so close together inside the jeep, we were not allowed outside. Nobody could determine on that 27in screen the difference. The 2 Canon lenses had to be magnified to reach the 600mm reach of the other lenses, which they did admirably. Now we were out in the cold early morning , scorching mid day sun, dust and numerous rain falls. Only the cheaper Sigma had no weather sealing, The Tamron has partial sealing, while the Sigma Sport is completely weather sealed, as are the 2 L Canon lenses, There were no problems with any of the lenses with this regard. I later bought the Canon 100-400 L mk 2 and the mk 3 1.4 extender, and it was superior to the Tamron but at twice the price, the difference only the individual can decide whether it was worth it, I did sell the Tamron and kept the canon , because at the time I could afford it. The quality of the Tamron was outstanding and i would recommend to anyone. Its unfair to compare to lenses costing 3/4/5 times as much. I used the tamron on various canon Bodies an 80D so the crop factor would give me an increase magnification a 6D and a 5Dmk4. It worked falwlessly on all I month in the Kruger Nat Park, then another later in Namibia. Manual focus worked better due to al the brush /trees etc surrounding the animals interfering. I now use the Canon R8. the autofocus is mind blowing with the various eye detecting modes, Im sure the Tamron would be ideal, and im actually looking right now at that possibility and i still have an RF 100-400. The Tamron G2 is NOT a "Cheap" lens, cheap being a relative term, compared to a Canon 500mm f4 yes its cheap, but i dont have to put my wife out on the streets to pay for it

[@yavornikolov4932]

I have the 150-600 g2 for two months. Using it on Nikon D7500 and Z6 via FTZ. The lens focuses great on both cameras, no issues at all. Shooting with such a long lens has some tricks and getting used to it is a certain learning curve for sure. My only complaint is the lens is sharp closed to 7.1 or better 8.0. At 6.3 it's a bit soft most of the time but otherwise it's focusing very precisely. I'll think for upgrade once I see what's the new Z 200-600 gonna be and maybe the coming 800mm PF if priced under 10 000.

[@Sunrazor]

My experience with 3:rd party lenses on Canon is exactly that. Inconsistent focus. And I have owned 5DmkIV, 7DmkII and 70D. All exhibit the same behaviour. Didn't matter if it was Sigma or Tamron. Once I switched to Canon lenses, all was fine. I got the Sigma 150-600C to work fairly well but that was an exception. Tried quite a heap of lenses. 50mm art, 16-35 art, Tamron 100-400, Sigma 150-600 sport and a few more. Nothing worked consistently. Now I shoot Nikon because I got tired of it. An old D610. And behold... all Sigma and Tamrons focus fine.

[@BlingBlingTheBSOFTHEISS]

So are you saying you got a bad copy? At the end of your video you said you’re hoping the replacement is better. So you ordered the same lens again? What are your thoughts on the Sigma contemporary 150 to 600? I had considered the Tamron, but I saw enough dissatisfaction reviews that I went ahead and got the Sigma.

[@UFGator1972]

I own a few Tamron lenses and I have never had any problems with them. As a matter of fact, one of my lenses is the SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD and it is a very good lens. Send it back to Tamron.

[@annemckinnell]

It's great to hear you had a good experience with this lens. I sent it back to B&H where I bought it and have just received my replacement lens so I'm looking forward to finding out if it is better. Fingers crossed!

[@jriis2010]

I am having issues with my Tamron 100-400mm F/4.5 - 6.3 Di VC USD. Within 3 meters (10 feet) its sharp, but further away i cant get sharp images and flying birds never get sharp. I have ordered a similar gadget and will try your test. Thanks for a good video.

[@eformance]

This is not a lens I would use on an APS-C camera, from tests I've seen it's clearly designed for FF sensors and doesn't perform well on a crop sensor. Expecting to get 960mm FF equiv with a "cheap" lens is kinda pushing it. I'd say that up to 300mm an APS-C sensor will perform okay, but not at double that. I'd pair this with a 5Dmk2 or later, it's cheaper than a 7Dmk2 and will give you back aperture and reduced sensor noise. I shoot a 55-250 on a 50D and it's always a challenge when light starts to go away, the noise ramps up much more quickly than the aforementioned 5D.

[@annemckinnell]

I have heard that as well, that this lens doesn't perform well on a crop sensor camera. But, the 5D Mk II only does 3.9 frames per second. That sucks!! The 7D Mk II does 10. That's a massive difference when it comes to wildlife photography. Thanks for the information though, it's great to get this kind of confirmation about pairing lenses and cameras.

[@CraigWagerle]

I've had the original Tamron 150-600 for about 5 yrs now. When the autofocus is working, I've been very happy with the lens. However, each year for the last 3 years, I've had to pack it up and send to Tamron Service center because the autofocus stopped working. They say they clean the mechanism (dust) and send it back. Since it has 7yr warranty so it only costs shipping, time, and annoyance. I really am not a heavy user and do not use it in dusty/dirty conditions, soperhaps this speaks to the quality of Tamron lenses. I plan to get rid of it soon as don't want to have this issue when it goes off warranty.

[@annemckinnell]

This is the thing! You've described my fear. Even if I got a good copy at this point, I really don't think I would feel confident relying on it. I've heard so many stories like yours and after having 2 bad copies myself, I can just imagine getting into some situation where I have an incredible scene before me and just then the lens would crap out and I wouldn't forgive myself for relying on it after hearing so many stories like yours. It's really unfortunate, but I have no confidence in this lens anymore.

[@FitsandFun]

I do not own the G2, but the other Tamron 150-600mm vc... I use the Canon 6D mk2 with it and it is near perfect focus. My only complaint is that the image seems very soft on my Canon T7i. Your results are actually very similar to the issues I had with the Sigma 18-35mm f1.8, but I'm not quite sure if any of this is helpful. Hopefully you get it figured out, nothing has been more fun than getting wildlife with that focal length! Really fun.

[@annemckinnell]

I love the focus system on the 7D MkII, but I have been getting feedback from people that the Tamron 150-600 doesn't work well with crop sensor cameras, so that could be a factor. Thanks for your comments.

[@motofotomike5575]

Hi Anne nice vid. Sorry you had a bad experience with this lens as I have this same lens. I personally have had good luck with mine and I have several Tamron lenses. My 85MM G2 is one of the very best lenses I have ever used. The Calibration of your copy was obviously very off from the start and really apparent at 65 ft. I would have at that point tried to calibrate the focus point to zero before moving to a greater distance and longer focal lengths and you may have found the focus at 600mm at 100ft and fine tuned it better at that point. Just a thought. I'm glad you found a lens your happy with though. Happy shooting to ya !

[@lastdaystravellastdaystrav2233]

agggh i got the 100-400 in dec 2020. i took it out of the box 2 months ago and the amount of dust inside was a shocker even to the camera shop i took it into to get it cleaned up. i haven't even done this test all my pics have been blurry so i am thinking its going to be the lens. thank you for doing this test.

[@timosuominen8407]

I have exactly the same problems with my Canon 7D MarkII and 150-600mm G2 lens. I bought it for bird photography, but it's just useless, because the pictures are almost never in focus. I tried to calibrate it with the Tap-In console, but didn't get the results i wanted. I'm going to send it back and wait for a replacement, but don't have high hopes that the new one is going to be any better.

[@annemckinnell]

Well I am glad to hear I am not alone in my disappointment of this lens. Actually I have heard from a lot of people who had the same experience. But also there are lots of people who love theirs. I am convinced it is a quality control issue. There are good copies and bad copies. But now that I've had 2 bad copies, I am not willing to try anymore. I hope you have better luck with your second copy.

[@roadtripimages]

I have the same lens, the G2 model. Did the same focus test as you did and got acceptable focus. Always seemed a little soft under actual field conditions though. With mine however, the autofocus mechanism has failed twice. It was repaired by Tamron both times. It was covered under warranty but it failed on me in the Tetons shooting moose. Not happy. I'd return it if I could but I'm past the 30 day period to do that. Tamron will not take it back. I shoot Nikon and have their 80-400mm zoom and it is fantastic. I just wanted a little more reach so decided to give the Tamron a try. The autofocus is nowhere near as snappy and accurate as my Nikon. But the Tamron doesn't cost as much either.

[@annemckinnell]

That doesn't sound very encouraging. Sorry you had a bad experience with your lens too. I've decided that if my replacement isn't absolutely outstanding I wont keep it. I don't want to be suspicious of the lens every time I get a bad result. I want to know for sure that it's me, haha :)

[@roadtripimages]

@@annemckinnell Now that I'm using it on a Wimberley Gimbal head it's working pretty well so sharp focus is possible with this lens. Fast shutter speeds are still necessary even with image stabilization.

[@martyxray5171]

Has a 5 year warranty - I've sent mine in 2x so far within first year.

[@curtrapp5291]

I've watched several reviews of this lens, and they're fairly positive. Comparing a Tamron telephoto to a Canon fixed lens isn't fair at all. You should get tack sharp from a higher quality lens.

[@albertjackson8468]

I have the same lens, on a Nikon D800 and D500. I have never had a focus issue in 3 years with this lens. I have noticed almost all of these "Bad Lens" reviews have one thing in common, Canon Bodies. I am not sure why, but it does seem like it is mostly a Canon Body issue. Either way, hope your replacement lens worked out for you.

[@annemckinnell]

I wondered about that too. It does seem like a lot of people who had bad experiences with the Tamron were using Canon bodies. The replacement lens was terrible too, but for different reasons. It certainly reinforced that the quality of each copy is different. I recently got a Canon 500mm (used) and it is awesome!

[@aaronsuek]

I spent quite some time calibrating my 150-600 G2 Nikon mount with the tap-in console a few months ago. It took numerous iterations, but it is possible to nail it down. Infinite focus at 600mm is a tough one to nail down and is even more trial and error than the rest since atmospheric distortions can cause issues. I was fairly disappointed at first with the lens, but calibration definitely brought out the detail.

[@annemckinnell]

It might have been possible for you to nail down your copy with the tap-in console, but the first copy of the lens that I got was so far out of whack even the maximum adjustment was not enough to solve the focus issues. Calibrating the lens is a pain, but worth it if you can solve the focus problems in the end. I'm glad your copy works though! Thanks for sharing your experience.

[@aaronsuek]

@@annemckinnell You're right, if you maxed out the adjustments you'd be somewhat out of luck unless you can compensate further with the camera's micro adjustments. However, if it's that far out, it certainly points to a lens issue. I guess I was lucky that mine could be calibrated within the adjustment range, and I've managed some great wildlife photos as a result.

[@rudytorres6559]

Anne, thanks for the video. I just got this lens. Needed it for some wild life projects. My copy did not focus at infinity, ...super soft. Was your replacement any better?

[@annemckinnell]

No, the replacement lens was terrible too, but for different reasons. It certainly reinforced that the quality of each copy is different. I recently got a Canon 500mm (used) and it is awesome!

[@pilarp8808]

@@annemckinnell Hey 🙂 exactly what kind of canon 500mm?

[@annemckinnell]

They only make one, it's a 500mm f4L. Mine is the 1st generation though and I bought it used. It's outstanding!!

[@julieholland9639]

I used this lens on my 7DII and the results were amazing, I sold the lens and now wish I had not, I have a sigma 150-500 and Im hating the quality from it in comparison. You must have got a bad copy

[@annemckinnell]

I sure hope that is the case Julie. It's great to hear that you had good results with the lens. It sounds like a lot of people love it and a lot of people had the same experience as me. That doesn't give a lot of confidence in their quality control. But I will reserve final judgement until I get my replacement. Thanks for the feedback.

[@nobbiestyles]

@@annemckinnell you are right and I am one in the 50% who had the same problem with a 100 400. Tamron quality is fully random.

[@PeterSzaban]

I bought a Sigma 150-600 contemporary lens for Canon a while back. It isn't terrible, in my opinion, but autofocus seems to miss a lot (maybe it's me). The lens seems to work better on my 40d DSLR, than the mirrorless R Will probably get rid of the Sigma soon because I found a used. beat up Canon 100-400, that is WONDERFUL, and a pleasure to use with both cameras. Hope the replacement works out for you.

[@annemckinnell]

I love the Canon 100-400 too, I have rented it a few times. But I really want the extra reach! I didn't really like using the teleconverter, but maybe if I used it a bit more I would get used to it. That could be the way to go. Thanks for your feedback.

[@Frank-cl3yx]

Hi Anne, good video, hope you'll let us know if the replacement lens works fine. Take care.

[@annemckinnell]

Yes, I certainly will! :) Glad you enjoyed the video, thanks.

[@WildAlberta]

Good guidline on how to calibrate a lens. Did you make adjustments to correct it usng the Tamron tap-n console, by updating the firmware and making correction to the lens usng the software? Did you contact Tamron or the store you bought it about a replacement under warranty?

[@jimkelly1829]

In the most recent Outdoor Photography magazine there was an article, In The Neighborhood by Don Mammoser, claiming how good the Tamron was. He mentions how sharp the images were even handheld. I hope your replacement lens is better.

[@annemckinnell]

Well that's good news!! I'll check out the article, thanks. I sure hope the replacement restores my faith in third party lenses. I've never owned a Tamron before.

[@GlenEly]

@@annemckinnell You probably just got a lemon. I have a Tamron 70-300 and my best friend owns the 150-600. Both are great lenses.

[@insightvideo6136]

Looks like you did the test correctly. I have the same lens and made adjustments for front focus as well, and now I’m getting stunning shots. Sorry it didn’t work out for you with either lens. By the way, I have the G2 version of the lens.

[@mickandrews9458]

I had focusing problems with the Tamron G2 where it simply would not autofocus at close distances without manual assistance. In addition, with close objects, it was so far out of focus there was insufficient microadjustment on my 70D to compensate. At long distances, however, focus was okay. I sent mine back and got a Sigma 150-600 contemporary instead and have been very happy indeed with it (it focuses faster and without the problems of the Tamron and gives far far better image quality at the edges). I would add that if you wanted to stick with the Tamron, send your lens to Tamron with your camera and they should adjust your lens to suit the camera under warranty.

[@annemckinnell]

Thanks for the feedback Mick. No, I don't have my heart set on Tamron by any means. I got my replacement lens and it also had focus issues - albeit different focus issues, not the same ones! And interesting to note that the problem you encountered with the same lens was also a focus issue, but again not the same focus issue. Now I can't decide whether to try the Sigma Contemporary or skip over it for the Sigma Sport. Or just stick with what I'm doing and crop.

[@mickandrews9458]

Anne I researched this to death reading lots of written and youtube reviews. The sport is very niche. If you want a larger aperture over a greater focal range (but not at 600mm), if you want a lens which is designed to be weather proof and manhandled then the sport is the one. However, optically it is not much better than the contemporary. Also it is about another 1Kg (2lb 3oz) heavier and a lot more expensive. I hope this helps.

[@paleroller]

I have the G2 24-70 and it took quite a bit of Tap-In fiddling to get it to work on both my D810 and D7200. However, the newer 17-35 and 35-150 2.8-4 worked perfectly out of the box on both cameras. I hope your replacement lens works out for you. Please keep us updated.

[@annemckinnell]

Unfortunately, the replacement lens did not work out. I have another video out about it. It also had focus problems. Not the same problems though...

[@boukevanderveen23]

Got no issue with the lens it works like a dime

[@drednezroth5369]

I'm considering this lens now as a future proof lens for myself. My current body can't do high iso, is that an issue? Also I'm not familiar with tap-in consoles, do I have to have one?

[@boukevanderveen23]

@@drednezroth5369 i shoot with a standard canon 7d body so high iso isnt a big issue for me, i never go higher then 1600, console is handy if you got a little technique background, ill send my stuff to a specialist and togheter we work tikk it fits my expectations

[@vipraz119]

Most probably defective example or user error. Tamron makes an amazing product

[@johnnysoderberg9693]

I've had 2 Tamron lenses and neither has been any good, Canon and Sigma lenses performs perfect.

[@michaelktori5178]

I've had to set mine to +12 on all my Canon bodies. Sometimes it just doesn't try to find focus on my 5Dsr. When it does, it's very sharp.

[@fylphotography9269]

Yeah I set it to +10 on my 80D and have a much better hit rate, but I'd still sometimes have to fumble back and forth. Also sometimes seems to me like the lens focuses more accurately when turning one way than the other. Very occasionally the AF stops working for me and I have to re-attach the lens. My unit has been through a lot of rough conditions which may have worn down the contacts and motors... However, I remember out of the box I often got a faulty communication error.

[@michaelogden5958]

I have G2 versions of the 24-70 and the 70-200. Both took a fair amount of TAP-in fiddling to get them within expected focusing capability. I wasn't too happy about it at the time but I've grown to like both lenses. However, I do agree that Tamron should make more of an effort to get these things dang near perfect so that the tweakers would be the only people who should have to fool with the TAP-in gizmos.

[@annemckinnell]

I'm glad they have the tap in console, but yeah, I really wish it wasn't necessary. I would love to be able to tell them which camera body I'm planning on using with the lens and have it arrive already calibrated. But maybe all camera bodies of the same brand and model are not identical either, I don't know. But with the copy I had, I had to move the micro focus adjustment all the way to the extreme end and it still wasn't enough! It is a PITA to do, but calibrating would be worth it if you actually were able to make it work and get perfectly sharp photos after all the effort. Thanks for your feedback.

[@Happyplants]

what the heck ? do we have to do these calibrations I was expecting that it will work just as it is.

[@annemckinnell]

Most of the time you do not have do it, but yes sometimes you do. Sometimes the focus can be off just a little bit and you have to calibrate your lens to make it just right. But I have to say it really annoys me that this is my job. I think we as photographers already have enough jobs - like not only the actual photography, but also website development, marketing, graphic design, book layouts, video editing and on and on depending on what you do in your business. But now I have to calibrate my lenses too? I seriously think this job belongs to the people who make the lenses. Sure, a lens may have to be different for various camera bodies, but I don't see how that should my problem. I think we should be able to order a lens, say what camera body we're planning on putting it on, and have it come properly calibrated. I'm not sure if this job belongs to Canon or Tamron, but I don't think it should belong to me.

[@thhiep]

I had one, it is super sharp at all focal lengths, just one problem recently was that the AF motor sometimes did not work well and needed some turns on the focus ring to make it work again.

[@Ichijoe2112]

Just out of interest, since neither the Video, or its description failed to state it so. Is this the Original eleven Herbs, and Spices, or is it this superior G2 version? That you were reviewing? The way I understood it the older version of this Lens wasn't that great to begin with. This confusion might go some way to explaining some of the hate in here. That said Screwy Lenses are unfortunately a thing, so yeah there's that. But, it would be great to know exactly which version you were testing at the time. The reason, why I went with this Lens (i.e. the G2 variant.), instead of the Sigma Contemporary (Which would have been 400€s cheaper), was two-fold one was the Arca Swiss Mount. (Whoopdedoo), and the little fact that this Lens should be 100% weather sealed. (Not just a dinky little gasket on its behind. Was enough to convince me. I guess we'll see when it hopefully Arrives tomorrow morning. Alas though the local forecast however is looking like rain.

[@annemckinnell]

It was the G2 - it is in the description (buried somewhere in the middle). Hope your lens turns out great. I know there are good ones out there.

[@aussiecqrider9524]

I have owned this lens for about a year and never had any problems photographing wildlife, even hand-held. As has already been suggested, it may require calibration with the Tamron dock or is just faulty.

[@annemckinnell]

It was faulty. Even calibration didn't solve the problem.

[@nsilva800]

The lens can't be terrible maybe it's faulty but probably is a compatibility issue with the camera. Tamron have some good lenses is not fair to burn a brand just because it didn't work for you in that setup

[@robertolisignoli]

Hello. I have the first series Tamron and it works great. Fantastic stabilizer! With the Eos 6D I didn't have to adjust the focus. I also had the Canon Ef400 5.6, tested together for over a month, I never noticed any difference between the two even when using the Tamron at f5.6 (400mm) I sold the Canon ef 400 because I prefer the versatility of the Tamron. Even on the 7D it always performed perfectly.

[@annemckinnell]

I'm glad someone out there got a good one!! Actually there have been a few people comment that they have a good one, but also lots of people comment that they had the same experience as me. I think the problem is in quality control at the factory. The lenses are not consistent. Thanks for the feedback.

[@NOM4D20]

Even this video is pretty old, I will comment anyway. So a lens so cheap like this obviously won't have great quality control. The 100-400 is 2x as much (in my country) than this, and that only goes to 400. Also, you can easily calibrate Tamron lens with the tap in console, which is 50 bucks or something. Comparing it to the Canon 500 F4 also is something like saying "Every car which is not a Ferrari sucks". This lens is a beast in terms of price to performance, but yes, it needs some adjustments. Having knowlegde about your gear and equipment can really help.

[@annemckinnell]

Thanks, I know how to use the gear lol. I did have the top in console. But yes, I agree that a lens at this price range does not have good quality control, which was evident. And if you get a lemon the price to performance is like spending 2K on a paper weight. Better to save up and get the better lens. The 100-400 is a thing of beauty, well worth 2x.

[@3439jc]

Anne, did you buy the lens used or new? The reason I ask is because most people buy the Tamron Tap-In Console with the Tamron G2 and calabrate/reprogram the lens's focus with it. So if it was used this might have been why it was so far out of focus.

[@annemckinnell]

Hi John, no, I bought it new. I also bought the tap in console and tried my best to do the micro adjustment, but it was so far out of wack even the extreme settings weren't enough!

[@3439jc]

@@annemckinnell wow

[@3439jc]

@@annemckinnell I have this lens also and do know that 550mm and above is very soft but below that is nice. I guess we can all get a bad lens every now and then. God bless and I love the videos.

[@liamfinch4129]

Tamron is a highly respected third party lens maker and their 150-600 lens is used by photographers worldwide without the problem you speak of - are you getting the picture?

[@martyxray5171]

Have this lens too - nothing but problems. It would lock up and not focus at all. Sent it in - they cleaned the lens but didn't fix it. Sent it back - they replaced the VC engine - this appeared to fix the lock up issue - hasn't happened since - but now when using continuous auto focus (with Nikon D750) and BIF, when subject approaches lens just gives up and when I reset - doesn't want to acquire subject. Bummed because I was ready to purchase Nikon 200-500 but rented a Tamron 150-600 that was great. I think lots of QC issues with this lens.

[@annemckinnell]

Thanks for sharing your experience. It seems to be a common experience with this lens, which is not encouraging at all.

[@bryanthornton6787]

My first experience with Tamron wasn't good. Granted my camera was older (Rebel XT) but I've never had any problems with it ever. Anyways, I bought a wide angle Tamron lens for it this past Oct? and after two clicks of the shutter, I got and Err 99 message on my camera. Turned the camera off/on and same thing so I sent the lens back for another copy. Same thing with the replacement. Fast forward a bit. I'm with an 80D and Sigma 100-300 f/4 and can"t get it to nail focus even after trying to calibrate. So I started looking at the Tamron 150-600 G2 and Canon's 100-400 as a replacement to the old Sigma. This video has convinced to me to make my first experience with Tamron my last. I sure would like that extra 200mm of reach though.. I hope your replacement works out.

[@annemckinnell]

That sucks. Err99 is a general error, but often means a miscommunication with the lens. Could be just about anything! But if you got the same thing with the replacement, that doesn't give a lot of confidence in Tamron, does it? I hope I don't have the same result with mine. On the other hand, if the replacement works great, and then in a couple of months starts not working great, I'm going to be really mad!! Thanks for the feedback. I'm interested in other people's experiences with Tamron lenses.

[@bryanthornton6787]

@@annemckinnell I see lots of good photos with the Tamron but I guess if it wasn't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all.

[@teresamunson5755]

This is one of the best videos I've been able to find that explains HOW to calibrate your Tamron lens and not just how to use the Tamron Tap-In console. Burning question that I can't seem to find an answer for, is when you measure the distance from the camera to the Spyder target (or whatever you are using) do you measure from the camera or the end of the lens? Seems like a dumb question, but this is a long lens!

[@ArcanePath360]

It really doesn't matter too much, it's just a rough guide as long as you are somewhere near.

[@ArcanePath360]

@mike farwell Thanks

[@andyrcampbell]

as a rule of thumb from the focal plane of the camera

[@MrAnonymule]

Sorry to see such poor results from this lens! I bought the mark 1 version of it 8 years ago and it was tack sharp out of the box. I love it, though admittedly I'm usually shooting on a ball-head mono with VC on and stopped down to f/8-11 almost always in bright conditions on a DX camera (Nikon D5300). There's always been variability in 3rd party lenses. But still the best alternative to paying 5K+ for the brand primes if you understand their limitations. It seemed like mine had the best vibration reduction of any lens I've used with it. Really made up for having it stopped down to f/8 most of the time.

[@jriis2010]

I have heard that vc should be off, when on a tri/monopod ?

[@MrHelperForever]

Same goes with my Tamron 18-200 on nikon body. Its horribly out of focus, this lens has autofocus issues too. Maybe I got a defective piece as well.

[@andyrcampbell]

Calibrate the damn thing !!!

[@loihpatli]

I just bought my new tamron 150-600 g2 for nikon and i'm really disappointed how the AF works. I was warned about Tamron's back-focus problems - my friend own Tamron's 24-70 f2.8 and he went to repair it about 3 times. The only telephoto lens i used before was nikkor 100-300 and i never had any problem with AF

[@andyrcampbell]

if your camera is the problem you will not fix it regardless of how many times you send it in to be fixed ALL LENSES ON NON MIRRORLESS CAMERAS NEED TO BE CALIBRATED TO TJE CAMERA THEY ARE USED ON !!

[@dalewatkins9889]

My copy has worked wonderfully Anne, albeit on my Nikon full frame. I do find the buttons/sliders, can move easily, and have found there is a button for the 'modes'. There was a time when I couldn't get mine to focus correctly either, as I believe I had it in mode 2, which is for 'panning' apparently. I switched to mode 1, and all is fine! Doing a bit of reading on this, here is some information Anne! "Three VC modes are provided. Mode 1 is designed for normal handheld photography, stabilizing the image on two axis (this was the only mode on the G1). Mode 2 is designed for panning with a moving subject with one axis of stabilization provided. Mode 3 is designed for photographing erratic action such as sports. In mode 3, when the shutter release is half-pressed, VC activates but does not stabilize until the shutter release is fully pressed."

[@skuzzy99]

Hmmm….. I have this identical lens on my Nikon Z50. It performed fantastic. Is it as good as a $10k 600mm prime? Of course not, it’s $1300! Maybe you need a firmware update?

[@fixedfocusmediaofficial]

This is the cheapest 600mm lens out there that is actually usable. It is far from top of the line so it will have limitations but mine works flawlessly for capturing wildlife with my 20 year old camera. The eyes of birds are perfectly in focus even when focusing through branches. Once I learned about the limitations, I found ways around them.

[@Ichijoe2112]

So what is that a 5mp 6mp tops? Body, and given this was 2004, thats being both highly optimistic, and or highly high-end for the day. Heck FWIW I don't even think the 1D was even Full Frame at that time either, as the 5D (Mark the nothingth.) Wouldn't even be out until a year later. And, that had what 12mp? Ok at least you could resolve an A4 sheet on that.

[@fixedfocusmediaofficial]

@@Ichijoe2112 It wasn't the high end model or the highest resolution one but it works well. I have many 8x12 prints that look fantastic up close and have viewed them at even larger sizes. I even got payed jobs in 2024 with it and no one ever knew it was old or low resolution. They were all blown away by the quality and detail.

[@Ichijoe2112]

@@fixedfocusmediaofficial Yeah I am aware of that. Little dirty secret about Megapixels, at least as far as FF goes, most 'Normies' (I should jolly well indeed include myself as such.), can do most of our work well enough in exactly 6mp. Anything above that is just space to let you zoom in, and crop, and still walk out with a usable image. Well that, and Marketing hype. Funny though that Camera Sensors, haven't seemed to have moved on very much since the 5DRs though. Or how people are equating their 1cm 50mp sensor on their Phones with a 50+MP 35mm sensor on an actual Camera. Not banging on your Body, but it's also why you really wouldn't use such a lens as this, or indeed one of the infamous papayatzee Canon L Primes on an APS-C Body the compactness of all those Megapixels will not only screw you over, trying to work out the Maths in you head. (If your a 35mm Dinosaur-brained dimwit, like me), but also work the resolution of your lens to the near breaking point. .

[@fixedfocusmediaofficial]

@@Ichijoe2112 It is a crop sensor camera. I do have some much nicer lenses for it too but it doesn't need them as much as my higher resolution camera body. It still picks up magnificent amounts of detail with a nice lens though. I believe in getting the best lenses I can for all my cameras and it definitely makes a huge difference.

[@Ichijoe2112]

@@fixedfocusmediaofficial I agree get good glass, and graduate to a better body after you mastered the last one. Or, you're just tired of having to face 'round with crop factors. That's what drove me off APS-C. Sometimes I just want to live in a perfect 1:1 world, where 50mm is 50mm and not a 50mm with an 85mm FoV.

[@ClimateRealism]

I have just had the same lens used on a BM Ursa Mini Pro 4.6k G2 and the images seem very soft. Almost impossible to get in focus above 400mm. I use manual focus but even when I get it in four its such a shallop depth of field. The super 35mm sensor increases the focal length to 1000mm at the top end so maybe it that extreme that is pushing it. Did you geta replacement? If so how as it?

[@annemckinnell]

I did get a replacement and it sucked too. Not for the same exact reasons, it was different, but it was also terrible. There's another video about that ...

[@creedpowell]

I've taken the same lens around the world for the last 3 years and have beaten the crap out of it. I just had my targets up for checking focus last week and it is still pretty perfect. I am wondering if you had the stabilization on, it jumps a lot on the Tamron and I leave it off or on 3 when shooting from a gimbal or monopod. At 100' handheld at 600mm I am sharp. . I also recently bought a lens from Amazon instead of a camera store and they sent me a used version that was a damaged return. That was my mistake when I can walk to Sammy's Camera I see your other replies. I'm shocked you've had such bad luck with it.

[@drednezroth5369]

I'm considering this lens now as a future proof lens for myself. My current body can't do high iso, is that an issue? Also I'm not familiar with tap-in consoles, do I have to have one?

[@creedpowell]

@@drednezroth5369 That all depends on what camera body you are buying it for. I can speak for having shot it for years on a variety of Nikon DSLR bodies(D810, D750, D500). I'm not sure what your high ISO limit is, but I rarely go over 3200. When using this lens I rarely use a wide open aperture. The Tap-in console from Tamron is useful to update the lens' firmware. For me the The other use for the Tap-In is for making focus adjustments along the zoom range of the lens. This takes an afternoon and is totally worth it.

[@drednezroth5369]

@@creedpowell just a nimon d3200, very weak iso settings 400 I the highest I go on a normal basis for fear of noise. If I am okay with some noise I can do 800 or so. I haven't been at this long but I definitely need a long range lens for wildlife photography, my 18-200 just isn't cutting it, I keep scaring things off. I've been looking for a suitable 600mm and the g2 keeps coming up

[@frankharrah7449]

Ms. McKinnell, Thanks for the demonstration on using the Spyder LENSCSAL aid. It made much more sense watching than just reading about it. I would be interested in learning if the Tamron C/S has remedied your problem(s) with the lens. I've been "on the fence" about which of this type of "super telephoto" lens to get. Now I'm back in a quandry.

[@annemckinnell]

Sorry to take so long to reply. I didn't deal with Tamron customer service at all. I bought the lens from B&H so I exchanged it for another one. The second one was also terrible, but for different reasons (!!!) so that did not bolster my confidence in the quality control of the lens. I returned that one as well. I had no problems at all with the exchange and return at B&H. First time I've ever returned something. I'm glad to go back to my trusty Canon 400mm where I get consistent sharp results.

[@jazzyzack7268]

I've had the same lens for Nikon for about 5 years and never use it. Bought it for Track & Field and have similar focus issue. Lens is horrible so it sits collecting the proverbial dust.

[@johnmohr4]

I have had the lens for about 3 years....Great lens love it!

[@donmonaco415]

This video was excellent for me since I have recently had a high interest in purchasing the same lens. The results you have gotten definitely tell me why the Tamron has the Tap-In console for adjusting the firmware to calibrate the focus in the firmware. I've never purchased a lens that was not built from the same manufacturer as my camera body but given all the variations in processors and camera models, makes me think that there is a strong risk of getting a 3rd party lens that is not optimized to perform spot on auto focus tasks at different distances. I would think a lens with this type of range would be a higher risk candidate. The cost of this lens is about 10 times less if I would purchase one from the same manufacturer as my camera body, which is why I was strongly considering purchasing it. Now I know from your video that if I choose to go this route that it is highly likely that I'm going to need to consider purchasing the Tap-in console.

[@annemckinnell]

I agree with that, the tap-in console did seem like an essential item. When I bought my lens, the tap-in console was included in a bundle deal - otherwise I might not have known how essential it is. I do believe the similar Sigma lens also has a tap-in console. Glad you enjoyed the video and I'll be doing a follow up soon since I just received my replacement lens.

[@loaderqsf]

Must be you because ive been using mine since the G2 150-600mm came out and my images are Spot On Beautiful

[@annemckinnell]

I guess you haven't seen my photos... !! I'm glad you got a good copy of the lens. It is obvious from the comments here and my discussions with other professional photographers that there are good copies and bad copies of the Tamron lens out there. It's a coin toss if you get a good one or not.

[@stevenpitts4689]

Anne, thanks for the video; I just got one like yours! Had it for a week, have taken around 1200 shots of birds on CA-F, both flying, hanging out, perched on a tree, etc. Each time I got home, thinking ok, I altered settings, these will be good. NOPE, I mean all my shots were fuzzy, not sharp, like crazy unsharp. My Olympus OMD tiny M43 sensor, with my 40-150 mm lens, with 2.0 TC, has always taken tack sharp shots of birds hundreds of feet away, or flying, etc. My lens goes back to Tamron tomorrow! retailer I bought it from is being real good, tried to trouble shoot and fix. But they did try stating numerous times, " you know, the 600 mm distance shots are always going to be hard; maybe try 400 mm"? Hell no, I'm not going down that road, I "hope" I have a defective one. If I get same results on replacement one, I will definitely stick with Canon, Nikon, or Oly Lenses.

[@annemckinnell]

I think it is such a cop out when people say its going to be soft at 600, try 400. I think the whole point for most people is to have that 400-600 range. Otherwise, just get a 100-400! Or a 400mm prime. If they can't make it be sharp at 600 then they shouldn't make a 600. Just my thoughts ... Hope your replacement lens was better.

[@williamgardner2739]

@@annemckinnell Anne when dealers say 600 is soft try a 400 that tells me the are trying to sell you a more expensive lens.

[@nightmareaccomplice5816]

Ive just gotten the first version and it focuses great. Its paired with my Nikon d7500. What's crazy is I only paid 387.00 for it. They said the focus and stability control didnt work. I figured id get it and fix it myself. When it came it works perfectly. I'm sorry youve had problems with yours. Did you ever get another one?

[@annemckinnell]

I did get another one and it was also terrible, but for totally different reasons, which doesn't give me a lot of confidence in their quality control. Since then I got a used Canon 500mm prime and it is outstanding. It does seem like the people who have success with their Tamron are pairing it with a Nikon and not a Canon. Just something I've noticed in all these comments.

[@nightmareaccomplice5816]

@@annemckinnell this is about the 3rd different time I've heard someone say that the only ones having trouble was canon users. I'm glad you finally Gor a good lens!

[@parsons585]

Noticed your cap was just like one of mine! Joshua Tree park! We enjoyed it there! So sorry about the lens! I have always stuck with the brand name lens which for my camera is Canon! I do remember a Tokina 80-200 f2.8 that was awesome when we were still in the old film camera days! The brand name lens are so much more expensive so I can understand trying an aftermarket! Hope things work out for you!

[@annemckinnell]

Love Joshua Tree!! Yes, I am with you, I always buy Canon lenses. But Canon doesn't make one that competes with this 150-600 focal range. That's the only reason I tried the Tamron.

[@PeteFoaleArtist]

Thanks for the vid. I have been trying to decide between the Signa and Tamron lens. You have just helped me make up my mind.

[@andyrcampbell]

The Sigma will fall apart on you in no time

[@vladradu9966]

My Tamron lenses are focusing spot on, including 150-600. You might need to AF fine tune, or calibrate it using the console.

[@annemckinnell]

Ummm ... that's what the whole video was about ...

[@bloodsport5112]

Hi Anne, did you get the replacement? If so, how did it work out? I'm thinking of getting this lens, would like to hear what happened. Thanks and take care!

[@RixozAmv]

Hey man! I also want to buy this lens, but after watching this video i wouldn't it anymore, but this lens is super good! She just can't focus right i guess! Can you leave your instagram? Then we can talk more about the lens. My instagram is @kasperbirding see ya👋

[@annemckinnell]

I did get a replacement, and it was also not a good lens, but for different reasons! You can find out more about that in the follow up video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fHXXp3V6jcZ4pM0

[@annemckinnell]

I have no problems focussing with my Canon 400mm prime lens. Or any other lens for that matter. The proof is in the pudding!

[@bloodsport5112]

Hey thanks Anne! Sorry I was lazy and didn't look thru your videos for the follow up. I have 5DMKIII with Canon 28-300. I got that lens for a trip to Yellowstone. I live in Alaska, we live on a lake and have a nesting pair of bald eagles but they're a couple of hundred yards away. The pair sit on a tree branch every day together. I was thinking that 600 would be the ticket for some better shots. Your review is/was the first one that had anything negative to say about the Tamron. Can't argue with your pics. Think I will look at the Canon 100-400. I wish Canon would get in on the game with something like a 300-600. You would have been in heaven when the ice went out on our lake. Had 10 bald eagles on the ice and as the ice went out they started fishing. It was truly amazing to watch that many eagles working. I never get tired of seeing them. Thanks again for your reply, truly appreciate it. Take care!

[@jasonkayla2]

Mine worked great on my 5D Mk IV till I had to send in the 5D for a new main board. When it came back the lens was slightly out of focus. I was told by Canon that a new main board required recalibration of the CAMERA. Apparently the recalibration is only as good as the tech doing it. I ended up buying calibration software and calibrating the lens to match the camera.The lens is now tack sharp on the camera at all ranges.

[@annemckinnell]

I'm glad you got one that works. I think a lot of people send their camera and lens together in to a tech to get them calibrated. That is a drag when you have to replace the board in your camera and then you have recalibrate all of your lenses. Ugh!

[@behramcooper3691]

After watching this video, I saw Tony and Chelsea Northup's review of the same lens. They didn't seem to have any problems with it. You might have got a bad copy.

[@annemckinnell]

Oh, I hope so!!! I really have my fingers crossed that the replacement is a good lens. I don't want to go through all that again! I don't think I will do all the testing again. If the lens isn't awesome right off the bat, I'll send it back. But anyway, good to know that someone had a good experience with this lens. Thanks for the comments.

[@FrankyboyLegend]

Well, they did mention both the Sigma and Tamron had AF problems but didn't really specify. Mine sometimes misfocuses around 20m but not always. I found the Tap-In too tedious and unreliable to adjust compared to AFMA in a camera (unfortunately I've currently had to revert to a camera without it). It also seems to me like the focus dial is uneven and there might be some kind of uneven sharpness at certain focusing distances depending on lighting...

[@JohnSmith-sq7cv]

This is definitely an issue with your camera. This lense is plug and play.

[@Ichijoe2112]

Did we ever stop to wonder exactly which version of the 150-600 was in dispute here, are are we exposing our G2 expectations on what was likely the original eleven herbs, and spices edition, which was widely known to be a bit sh17 compared to the closet Sigma Contemporary, at the time? 🤔

[@liverpoolpictorial]

I've had my 150-600mm for 4 years and it's been fantastic until yesterday, when it started shuddering when I autofocus by pressing the camera shutter button halfway down. I hope your replacement works straight out of the box.

[@mikewschultz]

The V/C has come loose, mines done it a few times now, not the robust lens as Canon offers

[@annemckinnell]

Unfortunately it did not. It had it's own set of different problems. Not impressed.

[@annemckinnell]

I guess there's a reason why Canon doesn't make a 150-600. It would probably be wildly expensive to keep up with their quality standards.

[@prime_outdoors1431]

Mine started doing that today, and only had it a few months, G2.....did you get a replacement?

[@mc12358]

I've used the Tamron 150-600 G2 for a few years now, currently paired with a Nikon D850. I will start off by saying, this lens is greedy for light. It's a poor performer in low light situations, and of course a lot of animals spend much of their day in poorly lit places. In good light, the auto focus performs well enough for my needs, and photos turn out very well (I did notice an upgrade in quality when moving from a D3400 to the D850 I have now, so the image sensor in the body does make a difference as well). Also consider distance. Somewhere in the 50-100 yard range, I notice a sharp decrease in image quality. My conclusion is that as long as you're willing to work within this lens's limitations with light and distance, it is a great lens for the price. No, a photo of a Green-winged Teal at 200 yards is probably going to turn out grainy or blurry. A photo of an American Redstart at 20 yards in good light can look like a wall hanger, on the other hand. The Nikon 200-500 is probably the best consumer grade lens for Nikon FX/DX systems, but when I'm taking photos of 5" Warblers high up in the trees, I want every bit of magnification I get from the additional focal length, so I stand by my Tamron. Practice makes perfect, keep shooting!

[@andyrcampbell]

It’s an f5 lens for f$&; sake - you want an 2.8 be prepared to spend AT LEAST 10x for it !

[@mc12358]

@andyrcampbell very true and most hobbyists and amateurs don't have that kind of money laying around unfortunately.

[@tonycapo8015]

I am still learning photography and no idea about calibrating lenses, would you say this happens often or is this rare when buying a new lens?

[@annemckinnell]

In my experience, it has never happened when I buy a new Canon lens. However sometimes after long term use I have to recalibrate my Canon lenses. I guess they get banged around a bit when I'm travelling. But I also rent Canon lenses quite often and I've never had to calibrate one of those. I don't have a lot of experience with third party lenses, but my understanding is that they require calibration more often, especially the telephotos. It's a good idea to have one of these little gadgets in case you have to do it, but the process is tedious!

[@brucewiebe6490]

What a terrible experience. Sony just came out with a 200-600mm lens which on your Sony crop sensor would be amazing. I was just about to buy the 100-400 with a 1.4 converter but now I’m not sure what todo. Nice to have choices though.

[@annemckinnell]

I saw that the new Sony came out, but it's $2,000! Plus, if I was going to do wildlife with my Sony, I would also need a 70-200, and probably a new body since mine is pretty old ... it's an investment. But I do love the mirrorless for landscapes. One day I'm sure I'll make the switch. The other thing is that I use my Canon 7D on the boat a lot and it gets kicked around. I don't think a mirrorless could take the abuse my dslr takes. But if you haven't already invested in big dslr lenses, I would definitely consider the new Sony lens too. Let me know how it works out if you get one!!

[@njrtech]

Also often overlooked. Mirrorless cameras do not require any AF adjustments... Since they focus directly off the sensor without a mirror. One big advantage in my opinion!

[@Mcappo]

I shoot Nikon and was considering getting this lens but Nikon has a 200-500mm lens that beats this lens out in image quality and VR is suppose to beat the Tammy hands down. With the price range being very comparable and the Nikon was on sale this past weekend I decided to pick one up. Can’t wait until it comes and hope you find something nice for your Canon.

[@MrFrankdoll]

Looks like you got a bad copy 🤷‍♀️

[@SPTSuperSprinter156]

Interestingly I have the same problem with a Tamron 70-300. It front focuses but the amount it does it by varies with focal length. Since I mostly use it at 300mm I micro adjusted to fix that, but then found when I used it at the lower end it started back focussing! It's a complete piece of junk, but I live with it for now as it cost me hardly anything. I suspect quality control at Tamron HQ for their lower quality lenses goes about as far as "did you tighten all the screws?".

[@gordonyoung1970]

If the lens was new why not return it under warrenty ?? Then to test it outdoors is ridiculous even a slight wind will shake the light plastic test sheet.

[@d3ci.b3L]

I dropped my lens on the floor, having too much in my hands. I think it still works good, but I hate that feeling of something gone wrong. Anyway, why not stop the lens down to f/8 or something sharper? Wide open just seems like asking for all kinds of mess....

[@annemckinnell]

Well, that's how you test if a lens is working properly. You should be able to make the focus point sharp when shooting wide open. If you can't get anything sharp wide open, then something is wrong with either the lens or the technique. In the field, if I want an entire bird's body to be sharp, then yes I would stop it down. But I don't want to HAVE to do that all the time to get something sharp. Sometimes in low light situations you have to shoot wide open.

[@d3ci.b3L]

@@annemckinnell That's fair. I'm probably not that good at noticing the little things, but if you do, then I can see why it's important. I use my lens for astrophotography, but I shoot long exposures, so I can afford to close the aperture a little bit. I'm happy with my lens.

[@jordannet]

what the gimbal model and brand do you use

[@stephenpridgeon7372]

When measuring from camera to subject, where do you measure from? The camera body? Or somewhere on the lens itself? Does it even matter so long as it's from the same place every time? Thanks

[@annemckinnell]

Hmm good question! I don't think it really matters that much because you are going to look at whether the camera is front focussing or back focussing. So say you measure 20 feet. It doesn't really matter if it turns out to really be 19ft, you'll still see whether the camera is front focussing or back focussing using the numbers on the ruler. I hope that makes sense. Now if you are comparing 20ft with 100ft, that's different.

[@monicaaeghin2597]

I have the 150-600 VC (not G2) version for my Nikon D7200. Wouldnt go for 500-600.. very soft images (not out of focus). Why not go for 100-400? Its more expensive :). Use it mostly to shoot superbikes. Satisfied so far.. never tried other lenses of that range though.

[@annemckinnell]

Only because I already have a 400mm prime lens (which I love). The whole point was to get more reach.

[@kenlor71]

So, any follow up? Did the replacement perform better?

[@annemckinnell]

The replacement lens was terrible too, but for different reasons. It certainly reinforced that the quality of each copy is different. I recently got a Canon 500mm (used) and it is awesome!

[@johobirding]

Hi Anne, have you tried Signa 150-600 Contemporary instead?

[@luiscypher9844]

Hi Anne mine is the G1. the thing is it was good for a few months then over time the VC now shudders.. wont auto focus anymore and i cant get it repaired locally so Im thinking of replacing the VC motor by myself.. not impressed Tamron

[@annemckinnell]

That doesn't sound good. I hope it worked out getting the VC fixed. These things are so frustrating!

[@TimNunyerBizniz]

Mine's sharp as sh*t for this type of lens. I got all the bugs worked out as it's a little light hungry. I also own a canon 500mm f4 which is super and I still keep my Tamron around on a 2nd body. It's a 3rd party lens and you can't expect prime results. Your copy may suck but in general the lens doesn't :)

[@annemckinnell]

There are definitely some good copies out there, but mine wasn't one of them unfortunately. I'm sticking with the 400mm prime that I can rely on.

[@TimNunyerBizniz]

@Aled Long your armpits maybe :)

[@TimNunyerBizniz]

@Aled Long Paid? you're a moron lol. Maybe learn how to shoot and you might and I mean might come up with a decent shot :) Until then troll be gone.

[@313w47st]

How about manual focusing? Wouldn't that be the way to go?

[@annemckinnell]

No. Not for me anyway. I am really bad at manual focus. Ever since I started wearing glasses full time about 25 years ago, I can't nail focus. And I don't like to wear my glasses when I'm photographing (especially if it's raining). I can see pretty well without them, they are just for distance. Autofocus needs to work. And when you're paying $1300 for a lens, autofocus should work!!

[@313w47st]

@@annemckinnell I do agree with that.

[@liverpoolpictorial]

The way to go is to get a replacement!

[@busyflyin]

Hello Anne; I am very disappointed with the kind of responses you are getting in the comments. I guess that's the internet. I too just bought this lens and it SUCKS! I've called the dealer and I'm sending it back. I have seen many positive reviews on this lens but the only one that counts is mine. I'm very disappointed.

[@andyrcampbell]

Calibrate, calibrate, calibrate !!!’

[@rcpmac]

@@andyrcampbell you might need to calibrate your reading comprehension and temperament

[@OldManandtheSuperC]

@busyflyin Photography seems to be one of those nerd attracting topics that brings out the prickly headed egos. If it gets to the point it’s hard to ignore a fun thing is to bait them, let them make their rude comments, bait them some more until you get a nice long list of them being rude. Then delete all of your comments so what’s left is a whole string of rude comments that don’t seem to relate to anything - kinda exposes jackasses. My fave was after trapping one supreme prick with this he suddenly turned into ???what just happened to me ??? They like to exploit anonymity but just hate it when it gets reversed.

[@cesarpalomares1398]

i have the exact same lens never had a problem with it, i use it for wildlife and it works great!!!

[@annemckinnell]

That's great, I'm glad some people out there got good copies! I think if you get a good copy they are really good, but if you get a bad copy there is no hope.

[@drednezroth5369]

I'm considering this lens now as a future proof lens for myself. My current body can't do high iso, is that an issue? Also I'm not familiar with tap-in consoles, do I have to have one?

[@berkeleygang1834]

Thanks for the warning. As a Nikonian, I'll be looking at Nikon's 200-500/5.6 instead.

[@annemckinnell]

I would do the same if I shot Nikon. I've heard that one is a great lens.

[@loihpatli]

@@annemckinnell it's interesting that many famous reviewers of this lens didn't mention these problems.

[@loihpatli]

I wanna rent 200-500 and compare them. I once asked Ricci Talks (great nikon-oriented youtuber) about which lens to buy and he said that Sigma and Tamron just cant beat the AF quality if Nikkor

[@KT4RAM]

I have the same lens and the AF Motor whines and goes crazy trying to find focus now so I have to use manual on it now. Not an easy task shooting pics of the F-15's doing maneuvers over our property. Mine is out of warranty so I guess I have to live with it.

[@rgman2858]

You could take it to a tamron dealer and have them fix it. It may be an easy fix

[@KT4RAM]

@@rgman2858 Unfortunately I don't have any in my area. I live way out in the country. It's quiet out here!

[@GreenTekHaus]

Same thing happened to me with my Sigma 150-600 Contemporary! Already decided to send it back, too! Super frustrating to get a BRAND NEW lens, and it DOES NOT focus at all regarding most distances, even with various adjustments, updates, etc. NOT A HAPPY CAMPER! My old kit lens 70-300 f4-5.6 coupled with a vivitar doubler gave me better shots! So I know something was definitely wrong! However, now that the new Z 70-200 f2.8 is due out in a week or so, I might just go for that, instead! At least I'll know what I'm getting right out of the box! I won't be able to do bird/raptor photography like I'd like to, but this crappy focusing problem was "for the birds"! (Yes, pun very much intended!)

[@annemckinnell]

Are you shooting Canon? If so, I highly recommend the 400mm f/5.6L. It's awesome!

[@GreenTekHaus]

@@annemckinnell Thank you for the recommendation. Unfortunately, I shoot Nikon, as I am a third generation user with legacy glass and bodies, plus my own additions, including the Z6, which I really enjoy with the older lenses like my Opa's old 50mm f1.4, and the classic 105mm f2.5 that I recently bought off eBay. Both are great fun to shoot with via the focus peaking capability of the Z6. My D7100 handles most sports and wildlife via the old zoom that I have, but was looking to get even more serious about bird photography since there's a "city hawk" living in the park across the street from my home. So, very disappointed that the lens I got was a lemon. My other Sigma, a 10-20mm f3.5 that is a great lens that always gets the shot for my real estate imagery. So maybe return the 🍋 and get another? Or just get the Z 70-200 f2.8 S lens? Leaning towards the latter, currently.

[@stripes_in_raw]

I had the same problem with the 150-600mm G2 when i rented one. At long distances its just not sharp and short distance like 10-20ft with subjects like tigers filling the frame it is sharp. Shooting wildlife at long distances like over 40ft, my Nikon Af p 70-300mm VR f/4.5-6.3 kitlens is sharper than this lens. Even after cropping, the kit lens is way better than the tamron G2. I would suggest the Nikon 200-500mm for nikon bcoz its very sharp with superb VR or, the 100-400mm for Canon. I have only used handheld without tripod or monopod.

[@annemckinnell]

The Canon 100-400 is a beautiful lens. I have rented it a few times when I was limited on how many lenses I could carry. I own the Canon 400 f/5.6L and it is a great lens too. I can get sharp images of subject that are a long way away. The Tamron wasn't even close. I sure hope the replacement is better. Thanks for your feedback about your experience with the lens.

[@stripes_in_raw]

@@annemckinnell Yeah please let me know if the focusing problem is fixed and the pictures are sharp. I also want to buy a telephoto, currently confused between Sigma 150-600 C, Nikon 200-500 and this Tamron 150-600 G2. I am currently in favour of the Nikon 200-500. If your issue is not solved then you should get the 200-500mm if you use Nikon or, the 100-400mm IS if you use Canon.

[@annemckinnell]

Well, I have a 400mm f/5.6L Canon lens, so I don't really need the 100-400. I am specifically looking for the longer focal length. I will do a follow up and let everyone know how the replacement lens turns out. Thanks for your comments!

[@mattboggs6304]

I had the first generation Tamron 150-600 for Nikon, back in late 2015. It performed slightly better than yours, but most things were either very soft, or almost completely out of focus. It was utterly useless for shooting birds for me, which is what I got it for. That was 5 years ago, and it is still the only piece of camera gear I have ever returned. Maybe Tamron has quality control issues with it, because other people have had much better results with it than you and I did.