My review of Matt Walsh's Documentary "What is a Woman?"

In this episode Trent reviews Matt Walsh’s latest documentary “What is a woman?” and talks about its strengths, weaknesses, and the parts that disturbed him the most.
To support this channel: / counseloftrent
The One Question Transgender Advocates Can’t Answer -
• The One Question Trans...
Analyzing Matt Walsh’s “Transgender Debate” on Dr. Phil - • Analyzing Matt Walsh’s...
What is a woman? Documentary: www.dailywire.com/videos/what...

[@TheThreatenedSwan]

We went from no uterus no opinion to anyone can be a woman in a matter of years. We have been going through a profoundly destructive cultural revolution for years.

[@bigantho1557]

It’s almost like Alex Jones was right 🤔🤫😴

[@Ivan.A.Trulyuski]

I like the shift because now I don’t need a uterus for my opinion, I just get to be a woman right in the middle of debate then call them bigot transphobes and laugh 😂 and laugh some more.

[@queent3343]

@@bigantho1557 That you think Alex Jones (Sandy Hook is not real) is right about anything should surprise me. But oddly, it just doesn't.

[@hfg8604]

He admitted he was wrong on that. He’s been right on so many other things

[@queent3343]

@@hfg8604 Really, what things? That you can lie and people will believe you until they don't and sue the pants off of you?

[@bennyp8363]

It's funny because Matt never even makes any arguments throughout the film, he literally just asks basic questions and all these gender ideology "experts" can't seem to give any kind of answer at all. It's lunacy!

[@marvalice3455]

I really liked the Bee article were they said that he just unironically doesn't know and nobody will tell him

[@jones2277]

are you that naive? the question itself was an argument. and I'm here for it! but i won't deny what it is.

[@Heyvuss]

@@bengreen171 So what your saying is that this is all made up and in no way reality? Even when the most recent member of supreme justice court could not answer this same question? Every documentary has it's bias for sure, but to write this off as propaganda shows just how brainwashed you have become.

[@SunakStarmerisacunt]

Except his questions are dumb and based on flawed logic, hence the experts being dumbfounded by his idiocy. Glad you admit Matty the nonce apologist made no arguments.

[@jovanleon7]

@@bengreen171 So, what IS a woman? Go on, I won't censor you.

[@thedomesticmonk772]

“Smug, narcissistic, and sinister“, that hits the nail on the head. These scoundrels are shameless! And Matt Walsh exposed them for it and the best part is they knew it and had to sit through it. God bless you Matt Walsh!

[@Carlos-fl6ch]

That is exactly the characteristics that fit this dude in his way of saying your either with Jezus or with death. That is simply the most disingenuous thing one can possibly say. It fits all the prefixes uses. Trent in ways is more dangerous and sinister than all the people he attacks. Demonic

[@Carlos-fl6ch]

Yes Trend you are on social media and you are extremely dangerous. Extremely intolerant towards anything idea that goes against your convictions.

[@youtubegirl149]

@@Carlos-fl6ch aren’t you intolerant of Trent’s views?

[@Carlos-fl6ch]

@@youtubegirl149 I am intolerant towards ideas that pretend to be superior to anything else based on nothing. They are dangerous, condescending and diminishing

[@rebirthofgodrics907]

@@Carlos-fl6ch so exactly like you

[@4Ever_2Eternitii]

I felt the same when he was talking to the african tribe, my husband and i were genuinely like please don't put any ideas in their minds, leave them in their happiness. Matt later said that he was really uncomfortable with them thinking that he was ok with this line of thought but couldn't correct them in order to not taint their responses. I was astonished and proud of them that they genuinely had no idea how that perversion would even work

[@ironymatt]

Gender dysphoria, as with many if not most psychological disorders, is almost exclusively an affliction of the privileged, and it shouldn't be that much of a mystery to see why. When people believe their happiness is contingent on getting want they want, truly appreciating what they have has a tendency to go by the wayside fairly quickly. On the other hand, when you don't have much materially, appreciation for what you do have is generally the default. It's not an accident the tribesmen were happy.

[@JustinL614]

@@ironymatt Okay that's a nice way of looking at things as someone who is in a healthy state of mind but things like depression and other mental issues sometimes have no apparent reason and can be hard to treat without alot of work. With that being said, there are so many types of dysphoria but we don't entertain them.. we treat them with the exception of only gender dysphoria. With Gender dysphoria we put these people through the mill and produce a ton of suffering without asking questions.

[@ironymatt]

@JustinL614 that's a pretty big assumption to say that "we produce the suffering". Denial of reality will *always* produce suffering - ask someone who jumps off a cliff flapping his arms because "in his reality" he can fly like a bird. Just because many forms of denial don't have such immediate consequences doesn't mean said denial won't sooner or later end up in some form of suffering. Every action most certainly has an equal and opposite reaction, even if one is buffered from the consequences of their actions. The problems can manifest in an almost unimaginable number of ways, but at their root aren't fully comprehensible by merely human means. All goodness, all truth, all beauty, and by extension all happiness and flourishing can only have their source in the infinitive divine, from whom all reality was brought into existence. At the human level all we can do is find explanations that temporarily satisfy us, and mitigate some of the symptoms, but happiness comes from above. Always has, always will (say it like Elvis😀). Bear in mind I'm not saying material success is wrong in and of itself, but such success does have a pretty strong tendency to insulate us from the natural order, and sometimes to our great and/or seemingly mysterious detriment.

[@tonyl3762]

I didn't get the same feeling. They told Matt that those ideas made them less likely to move/travel to America. The smiles and laughter made it clear they were not vulnerable to accepting the insanity that has infiltrated over here.

[@franciscositja4079]

@@tonyl3762 it only works with people that accept the shaming for not conforming to the belief. It's definitely not from God, trying to impute shame on people for holding on to common sense.

[@MegsLeaB]

“You’re a parent not a friend” 🙌🏼 Absolutely 💯%

[@sandstorm7768]

When it comes to the "demonic" stuff...I think you might be onto something. For me it's not so much their tone (although they can be very grating and condescending and baby-talking), it's the moral relativism itself. It reminds me of the Serpent in the Garden of Eden. "You can do whatever you want...you can be whatever you want... Only you know what's best for you, no one else! Especially not God!" I feel like these people wrapped up in transgender ideology want to rewrite Creation in their own image and be their own gods. They don't want what God made for them, they want to be their own masters in every way they possibly can.

[@Qwerty-jy9mj]

Take a look at how homosexuality was removed from the DSM5, I'm fully convinced it was a demonic apparition.

[@MidnightIsolde]

Yeah, and it's very likely that they view Satan in a positive sense as a "liberator". From a purely aesthetic symbolic perspective of course, since the prerequisite of this thought is first doubt and resentment of God and second atheist belief that He does not exist and instead we're just all here for no meaning or truth. Then one decends into nihilism and moral relativism, but also depression, anger, ego and misanthropy. This was my own trajectory so I think it's pretty accurate. Thankfully, I've never really been on board with the lgbt and progressivism (except in the vague sense of it being normalised as the correct and "sophisticated" position. The trans stuff was too far for me however, and was a part or what made me begin realising how messed up culture is now.

[@ngoziokafor5682]

You are spot on..

[@angelalemos9811]

Great observation

[@jamesmaybrick6750]

@@MidnightIsolde lol. Satan, Actually believing in gods/demons/satan etc are far more delusional than any trans wackaloon activist. You lot are crazy. At least trans people actually exist.

[@brendansheehan6180]

Man, I was hoping you'd review that movie. It was amazing. You, all of CA, Walsh, philosophy for the people, etc are bringing sanity back. Keep up the amazing work!

[@shibaos]

Seeing physical stuff like tops scars, the woman's forearm, etc. should be enough to snap anyone back into reality and realize how horrifying the movement is just under the surface

[@garydlinger7013]

@@anotherknightlostinlordran4718 Even if nobody ever suffered physical damage what about the transgender people who end up killing themselves? We hear the argument about people who kill themselves because they can't change their sex but far too many pro transgender people say very little in regards to those who end up killing themselves after gender reasignment anyway! It is wreckless and total insanisty to give in to these people!

[@AM-qz6cm]

They should show more bottom surgeries. That's worse by 10 fold.

[@shibaos]

@@anotherknightlostinlordran4718 saying behaviors are just a "minority" is the slippery slope. The suicide rate also is like over 50% now iirc, they try to not report on it.

[@garydlinger7013]

@@anotherknightlostinlordran4718 Mental health of any kind should be treated with proper medications and/or psychology/counceling. Just as Anorexia Nervosa and Bulemia are treated as mental illnesses the same should be the case for those with sexual identity issues. Catering to peoples illnesses is not doing them any favors. How on earth did our ancestors self identifying as the opposite sex of their birth ever get through it? I am sure there were suicides but just the same there was no such thing as gender reasignment and many of them had to accept the sexual identity they were born with. Plenty of them survived and they did not have the luxury of modern medicine and mental healh advancements and knowledge. At what point do we draw the line? Should we accept people self identifying as anything they feel they are for fear they may commit suicide or have some kind of psychlogical breakdown? What if fhey self identify as a potty training toddler? Should we let them live out their lives that way? Is it reasonable or practical? At what point do we draw a hard line? What is off limits? We as a society need to do better!

[@anotherknightlostinlordran4718]

@@garydlinger7013 I see that we share a view but this is exactly the stuff in which the left and right-wing disagrees. The left wants limits to be foggy so they can submerge the population into a nebulosa of concepts where everything is subjective. Take the question what is a woman as an example. Their first answer is someone who identifies as a woman. This is obviously a circular definition but when someone points that out the activists refuse to provide an alternative definition. If we dive even deeper into this, an argument used to defend the leftist position of not defining the term woman is that we don't need definitions and they only exist for practical use. This complete brain damaged ""argument" is against logic because if we shouldn't define anything, then reality shouldn't be defined, then we can't reach conclusions, then we are stuck intelectually. Its all a rabbit hole of stupidity

[@nanagaga2001]

Why should someone's sense of male and female override biology? Because when it comes to sex our culture has gone insane. Utterly insane.

[@stephengalanis]

They'd say what's overriding their biology is their soul, which is the real centre of who they are, and doesn't match their body. Do you believe souls are real? I'm an atheist, I don't.

[@richardpeterson9653]

@@stephengalanis Not necessarily would they appeal to the idea of a soul. I have seen explanations appealing to brain chemistry for explanations as well.

[@stephengalanis]

@@richardpeterson9653 Professor Dave Explains for example. I still think Trent needs to debunk souls as even real, like really strongly push back against woo like that, because it might be that the neurobiological explanation doesn't reach all the way to transgender -- merely proving intersex is a thing, or the brain is malleable and makes mistakes. For someone with gender dysphoria, that's a tough place mentally. I think for a more comfortable, simpler answer, souls are always going to be a popular post-hoc explanation. Trans is often couched in quasi-religious terms, it's often framed in "born this way" "my soul has always been different to my body" type of language. So come on Trent. Go after the low-hanging fruit: no one has a soul, so no one has a mismatched soul. On an epistemological note, it's interesting how conservative Christians don't quickly grab the easy supernatural explanation "god did it! "when it's something they don't like. Oh no, they want something else. And they stay fully rooted in the material world.

[@richardpeterson9653]

@@stephengalanis I don't think you or I share much incommon in terms of our world veiw. For instance I don't share your views on hard naturalism. I find thought and perception to be much more fundamental to reality than the materials we interact with. After all in hard naturalism selection isn't for truth, self awareness or reality. Those ideas are irrelevant to survival! Yet here you and I sit discussing such concepts as if they are meaningful. This would be impossible for me to treat seriously if I accepted hard naturalism. None of this matters or even actualy exists in the veiws of a purely material reality. We would be simply two chemical interactions bumping into each other with nothing being conveyed but elections. Honestly I don't think that I could treat this conversation as meaningful if I remotly thought that was true. Yet the structure of our conversation it's self feels as if it is meaningful. Conversation, words and ideas converted into electronic patterns sent around the world creating not just a simple pattern of chemistry, but new ideas and ways to interact with perception and the reality of our experience. I to me it seems like you're assuming you're perception of reality is more true than the trans person or Trents how if hard naturalism is true none of that is relevant because it's simply a just chemical interaction. To acknowledge the value of these conversations is simply to acknowledge that their is something more than a simple chemical interaction what one might understand as a soul. Yes this means to me that this conversation it's self runs counter to accepting hard naturalism. On the other side transgender actively seeking to alter the natural reality in attendance to their perception. Going so far as to not simply alter their bodies but to force others into their perception, "canceling" those who will not capitulate. I think what you precive as "they stay fully rooted in the material world" is convenient dismissal of their believe in a common reality and seeing the value in respecting that common ground.

[@thorbeorn4295]

I felt the same about the demonic aspect. It's creepy as hell to watch some of these people defending this when smiling and laughing with "soothening" voices... Sometimes you see it in their eyes too. The devil is real. It's among us...

[@danibuki727]

SUS

[@vulcancent774]

@@danibuki727 omg- lol

[@danibuki727]

@@vulcancent774 Had to do that

[@robosquid2518]

AMONG US

[@theladyfemi]

You got it wrong about Matt needing to defend what the definition of woman is. Once you start doing that you have already lost. These people do not listen. Allow them to speak and their illogical dribble will win the argument for you. That is why Matt’s method is so effective

[@ccrisc100]

It's not about defending it so much as it is about giving a definition you can't poke holes on.

[@theladyfemi]

@@ccrisc100 the point is that no engaging from a defensive position or even trying to define woman for them is not helpful. They are not listening neither are they interested in logic. Matt’s strategy of letting the absurdity of their position speak for itself is the best way to deal with them.

[@ccrisc100]

@@theladyfemi except this documentary isn't made to preach to the choir only. Is supposed to also change minds and you wouldn't want to lose the argument because someone poked holes at his definitions and was like "I guess it is a complicated definition".

[@theladyfemi]

@@ccrisc100 you can’t change the minds of emotional people with such fixed views with logical definitions. Hearing their peers being incapable of following through with any coherent thought process is more likely to trigger a change of heart.

[@tomreichardt6044]

Trent, I am a chemist with more than 20 years experience. The hard sciences are not now as as bad as the social sciences. But there is ALOT of science fraud going on. Scientific community is not a bunch of truth seekers anymore. They do not have the common good in mind. I could point to the pharmacudical industry for many examples we have all seen lately.

[@paularnold3745]

Yes, just ask my wife who is a PhD molecular biologist . She got out of research and now teaches at a community college because she became so disgusted by the politics and the downright dishonesty. She had supervisors tell her to alter data and trash results of unfavorable experiments. She refused and when she reported the abuses nothing was done to the supervisors and instead she was treated like the "bad guy". When money instead of discovery is the motive, this is what happens.

[@tomreichardt6044]

@@paularnold3745 Cancelled scientists of the world UNITE! #metoo

[@wulfheort8021]

pharmaceutical*

[@Joker22593]

I stopped trusting social scientists a long time ago, but I think I was in college more recently, so I saw the crazy up close and personal, in a way that older people may have not.

[@estcado]

Can you tell me more of what you saw and experienced? Cheers

[@JustinL614]

Social scientists are not scientists

[@ironymatt]

Science, like anything else, is only as good or as bad as the people conducting it, and there's a reason the social sciences are referred to as "soft science". It's as Trent says here: when it comes to human behavior, almost any data set can be manipulated to achieve whatever outcome is desired, should the scientists - or more importantly those funding them - lack the scruples necessary to follow the data wherever it may lead.

[@zxyatiywariii8]

Social science has become almost an oxymoron. . .

[@michaeldarwin6695]

Trent, I’m 6’4 and I hit my head on things all the time. It’s not all sunshine and butterflies up here haha

[@david2theKay]

Amen! Tall people got their own set of problems.

[@disguisedcentennial835]

I’m 5’5” and I would rather hit my head on things than have to jump up to reach things. Y’all get natural strength, too. Count your blessings, tallies!

[@zxyatiywariii8]

I'm a shortie but one of my friends is extremely tall, so when we're on an airplane, I have plenty of room even in the cheapest seats, but he has to contort himself into a very uncomfortable position just to sit down and buckle his seat belt; and he doesn't even try to use the bathrooms. So I know it's not all sunshine up there!

[@ccrisc100]

🤣

[@Serquss]

I agree, do not let children on social media until they're 18 or 21.

[@deiniolbythynnwr926]

>children >18 or 21 What??

[@Serquss]

@@deiniolbythynnwr926 I know, but you get the idea.

[@HolyKhaaaaan]

Maybe not even then.

[@FREEDOM-qb8db]

There would be far fewer mass shootings if what you suggested actually happened.

[@Serquss]

@@FREEDOM-qb8db Allowing your child to go unsupervised on the internet and social media is the same as letting your child roam the streets all day long, by themselves.

[@allegrahanda6567]

I watched the documentary and I’m so happy the daily wire made it, it’s powerful and superbly made

[@Men_In_Jesus]

I use the word demonic all the time - and it's not hyperbole.

[@disguisedcentennial835]

Be careful with such words or you’ll do more harm than good

[@westonmeyer3110]

@@disguisedcentennial835 It is far worse to understate reality.

[@paularnold3745]

Diabolical is better when speaking of a conspiracy, collusion or an agenda. Demonic is better for an individual. I would call Cultural Marxism and CRT diabolical, while the individuals who promote these ideas are demonic. Demonic politicians have devised a diabolical plot to take over the world.

[@communityrags6048]

Of course, you *do* know that demons and gods aren't actually real?

[@MiszuFiszu]

One of the most shocking moments was during an interview with the professor (I think?) at that one university, where he basically used "essentialist" - in the sense of asking for clear definitions - in a deeply pejorative sense. I think Matt missed an opportunity there to ask (ideally before asking what is a woman) "what is a transgender person" - surely they'd have a definition for that, and then it would be even harder to weasel out of answering a similar question for the term "woman". Although at this point I wouldn't be surprised if they doubled down on the relativism and just called it a day. Great documentary in any case. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on it.

[@AM-qz6cm]

"can you define woman without using the word woman?" Who would have thought such simple and direct questions would cause for such pause and confusion at 'institutions of higher learning'? (we know this, already) He got the professor good when he asked something like 'isn't the U of Tennessee in the pursuit of truth?'

[@Ebradley2351]

I also found this part shocking. I wonder why they don't define woman as something like the following: "A woman is a human being who identifies with the cultural roles and norms traditionally associated with human females." It's still hugely problematic, but it's not blatantly circular.

[@MiszuFiszu]

@@Ebradley2351 I think they can't get themselves to use such a definition because it validates - if only to a degree - the very norms they have spent the last decades degrading, deconstructing and - most importantly - insisting it has no real meaning since it's just a "social construct". Admitting that these social norms are what's actually being used to "diagnose" supposedly transgender individuals would be an instant admission to a huge contradiction in their worldview. That's at least how I would guess they approach this problem (if they ever actually give it a thought, instead of just being content with denial of reality).

[@AlexPerazaTV]

The guy was getting emotional over a simple question and wanted to end the interview immediately

[@artifexdei3671]

@@AlexPerazaTV all his(?) students must be just naive kids drinking cool-aid.

[@richardcraig599]

Compassion is one thing, recognizing their delusion as authentic and using their preferred pronouns is taking part in a lie and a grave mortal sin

[@truthbetold1855]

100%. I akin it to believing that someone with an overeating disorder says they feel better if you give them 10 pizzas a day, so you do it.. and believe you are solving the issue. They are ENABLING a delusional disorder.

[@highlightning6693]

Getting people to believe and espouse lies is a Communist tactic. If they can get you to do this a part of you dies and you become easier to control. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who spent decades in a Soviet gulag for criticizing Stalin, talked about this. A famous quote from him on this is: "You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world. Let it even triumph. But not through me." The Lord is our strength. Not by might, nor by power, but by His Spirit. :)

[@peanutforever2191]

I am glad you brought up anorexia as a type of body dysmorphia. I have been diagnosed with anorexia, was treated for years, and while my eating disorders are largely under control, I know that I still don't and most likely never will look in the mirror and actually see what is there. Knowing that I don't really look like I see myself, doesn't change the fact that I feel I do. If the same insanity that applies to those suffering from gender dysphoria, applied to those of us who struggle with body dysmorphia, then doctors would encourage people with anorexia to starve themselves to death, and I could expect a store clerk to tell me that I am a size 10, even though I am a size 2, otherwise they could be cancelled, fired, or jailed. Anyone who assists in this insanity, from health care professionals to parents, are guilty the same way everyone in the above examples would be, in a parallel universe.

[@n41698m]

Adult human female is a perfectly fine definition. Simple, and yes, doesn’t account for rare discrepancies, but it’s a perfectly good definition for the rule, which is 99.9%+

[@musicman1eanda]

It's an okay definition, it's just that there's still a rabbit hole underneath that definition as Trent points out.

[@ge2719]

@@musicman1eanda theres not though, absolutely every single intersex condition the persons body either produces or is supposed to produce eggs or sperm, never both, never some third thing. You cant take a person with a fully developed ovary, and maybe one underdeveloped ovary, with a large clitoris, and a womb and say "that person is a man". theyre a woman. Its literally binary. everyone is one or the other. and these people who believe they are in the "wrong body". intersex people typically accept that they have traits that make them different from the average of their sex, but they dont believe they are the opposite sex. Even when theres a biological reason for those people to be confused or have issues around their body, they arent the ones falling for this bs, and they don't like being lumped in with it, or insinuated that they aren't the sex they are.

[@altafglen2775]

And what that discrepancies may be

[@alistairkentucky-david9344]

"Female" is not a synonym of "woman". Lassie is a female but not a woman. Thus, the definition of Adult, Human Female is not circular. It's amply defended by very able philosophers such Alex Byrne and (I am almost certain) Tomas Bogardus. You should have the latter on your show btw. He is a Catholic philosopher who writes on gender theory providing insightful critiques. [I agree though that appealing to "female" in the definition of "woman" kicks the can down the road since the wackiest gender critics refuse to even acknowledge the reality of physical sex].

[@TheCounselofTrent]

I agree they aren't strictly synonymous but the terms for human beings have very similar meaning. I just wished Matt had spent maybe five minutes on this and rebutted arguments dealing with stuff like intersex, chromosomal abnormalities, etc. Otherwise it was a great film.

[@Seethi_C]

I second the idea of having Tomas Bogardus on! He could help Trent (and the rest of us) refine our arguments

[@Seethi_C]

@@TheCounselofTrent A follow up documentary could be useful to delve into the question of “what does it mean to be female?” But the while point of this documentary was to just get an initial non-circular definition, which the other side couldn’t even do.

[@alistairkentucky-david9344]

@@TheCounselofTrent Agreed! Keep up the good work Trent.

[@theshadowknows2656]

@@Seethi_C Capturing Christianity will be having him on to discuss the documentary.

[@ntmn8444]

I’ve never seen Trent so fired up like in this video. But I don’t blame him! I watched the documentary, and it was funny, but also outrageous. I agree with all of Trent’s points. That Dr. Forcier was 💯 the creepiest one of them all! They all were. But she was the worst one.

[@XanarchistBlogspot]

Yeah the new agey sing songy voiced lies to justify butchering children was infuriating and sickening.

[@ntmn8444]

@@XanarchistBlogspot totally. As a woman, as someone who can give birth, I cry out in pain for the children. How can other women be so cruel?

[@XanarchistBlogspot]

@@ntmn8444 indoctrination and lust for power. Hey you asked. They are not going to surrender that power without a shall we say dynamic and kinetic fight either.

[@XanarchistBlogspot]

Women like that are the cat's paws of the true rulers in media, academia and the deep state. If I were a woman I would be angry that men did not man up and take these butchers out.

[@zxyatiywariii8]

That one sent a chill up my spine. . . 😳

[@Jerds]

SWEET BABY GANG! Matt Walsh has been my favorite on the DW for a long time

[@paradisecityX0]

You should interview Matt Walsh on here

[@icecreamjunkie6790]

That would be a great interview

[@xXXDeadlyHavocXXx]

Was waiting for this review! Excited to watch!

[@paulaaracena-sherck8154]

The only thing I didn’t like about the documentary was that Mr. Walsh did not ask a Catholic apologist like you. The Catholic Church has very concise and direct definitions, including those of man and woman. You have the best one I have read about in a long time: “A human being who is naturally ordered to reproduce inside herself”. Thank you for the review.

[@ChillAssTurtle]

Female n woman are different.. gender n sex are different.. please read more books

[@an7440]

@@ChillAssTurtle so before there were books they were same

[@paulaaracena-sherck8154]

@@ChillAssTurtle errr... did the definition I stated contained the word "woman"? nope... the word "female"? nope... "gender"? nope... "sex"? nope... Did my comentary made a point about differences or similarities between the concepts of woman and female? nope... about gender and sex? nope... I don't understand your reply to my comment.

[@ChillAssTurtle]

@@an7440 its been that way forever. Oof.. low iq

[@jpbm1873]

@@ChillAssTurtle You should read a dictionary because this is literally the definition of the word woman: adult human female. This is literally the definition of the word female: of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes. So as you can see the word woman (and man) literally refers to sex and the question I ask is: is this supposed to be surprising? When we put a man and woman side by side we can tell who is a man and who is a woman because of the biological differences between both genders. When we say the words: "we're fighting for women's rights" these words have meaning and we know whose rights we're fighting for don't we? Gender pay gap is based on what? I honestly don't understand why some people pretend not to know what is woman?!

[@angelsantos8459]

You described the movie perfectly, a well done review! Thank you. Looking forward to this movie

[@bennyp8363]

Watched this film last night! I really appreciate Matt Walsh for putting this together

[@lisapollard4675]

Awesome review. I watched this documentary with my 13 year daughter and we had an amazing conversation about the topic. I highly recommend letting your older kids watch this documentary. It exposes so much!

[@ccrisc100]

Especially if they are in public schools. So necessary to discuss these topics openly.

[@lisapollard4675]

@@ccrisc100 Absolutely agree. We pulled our daughter out of public school 2 years ago. She has been doing homeschooling/online school through a Christian School in our area. We love it and she is happy too. :)

[@HarringJess]

Very informative video, thank you Trent. I saw Matt's documentary and it was amazingly detailed and informational.

[@catherineoliveri4876]

Thanks Trent! So glad you reviewed “What is a Woman?” I love Matt Walsh’s dry humor! I definitely want to watch this documentary film! You pointed out some great critiques!

[@darinpearson2554]

Very impressed with your communication style and quality. New subscriber.

[@LostArkitekt]

Matt Walsh has actually addressed the intersex issue and Klinefelter's, etc., many times. Also, in your "schmender" analogy (which I talk about all the time), I was expecting you to talk about the guy in the Netherlands (I think) who wanted to have his age changed because he felt like, had the health of, and identified as someone 10 years younger.

[@juanortiz2937]

Thank you Trent for all you do. I love your review and look forward to your work on liberal Cats. I live in San Francisco and it’s quite something. I am sticking around for bit to bring light to such a lost place.

[@tazzyt5269]

Never give up friend

[@YellowEllo]

You cannot argue with relativism, it is just an evil absurd argument that destroys reason and the ability for humans to relate to eachother. The worst is that it can be addicting because it means you can never be wrong

[@excutter]

I remember people saying... "What's next? People gonna start identifying as animals and lawn furniture?" Aaaaand... Here we are.

[@queent3343]

We have Republicans identifying as people. Truly, what IS next?

[@thomasjorge4734]

That's already happening!

[@machellovelivelife658]

They shouldve made it available more mainstream, because likely, only those who already agree w/ the documentary's stance will pay to see it...therefore almost not influential in the long run...those who dont agree will likely not want to give money to watch it.

[@ponderingCanuck]

This was my thought was well. The people who will watch it are those who likely already appreciate daily wire and their content. Even for me, I would love to watch it, but I'm 🇨🇦, and while I appreciate much of what this channel does, I don't need to watch even more American politics and news to the point that I would pay for a subscription.

[@TheCounselofTrent]

I bet they will put it on KZbin once the first wave of subscribers joins DailyWire.

[@ThePhil737]

The BBC actually had a well done documentary on transitioning kids a few years back. Can’t remember what streaming platform it was on though.

[@disguisedcentennial835]

@@TheCounselofTrent sadly no. Matt Walsh’s response was “Simply quit paying for services like Netflix who hate you and are evil and start paying for services like ours.” On Twitter.

[@grimsonforce7504]

@@disguisedcentennial835 😂😂😂 paying for services like ours lol yeah no.

[@dinocollins720]

Another fantastic video; thank you!

[@javiazar]

Subbed. Just because you reviewed this documentary in good faith.

[@timboslice980]

I had fell for a woman years ago and her two daughters. She was going through a lot and decided to become lesbian. One of her daughters asked if i was going to be her new dad. I said no were just friends. I just reconnected w her to find that little girl is now 16 and transitioning to a boy. Her lesbian mother is against it so the school labeled her as transphobic and are now helping the girl with drugs and planned surgery.

[@dylanstuckey3824]

That’s horrible

[@daddada2984]

Sad..

[@timboslice980]

Yeah its a horrible situation. I shouldnt hate to say it but thats what happens when you get away from gods design. She was one of the first married gay couples in MD. Now shes labeled a transphobe. Todays trans will be considered pedophobes by the next generation.

[@JustinL614]

@@timboslice980 Hmm. I'm not religious but, I am conservative, I respect your beliefs and I would simply like to say that biologically there are only two genders and the bible gets alot of things right. I think it's time for all the people on the right to stop the left from destroying civilization.. Even if our beliefs differ our goals are not that different.

[@rana.5655]

@@timboslice980 She became a lesbian simply because she was going through a lot? Care to explain?

[@caterinadc5567]

Finally watched this film and it was good. Also, gotta say, it's *cathartic* to hear people like Trent comment on how the behaviour of some of the people in the documentary came across as "demonic". I'm still recovering from a difficult few years immersed and under the thumb of basically these people, and when others don't... see it? Part of the suffering is that you just feel INSANE because others don't see the insanity you're reacting against.

[@nfragala]

Excellent review. Thanks!

[@AM-qz6cm]

"don't trust social scientists anymore" A lot of medical doctors in on this too.

[@queent3343]

So you're going to treat yourself medically? Gonna set your own broken limb? Going to give yourself stitches? Going to operate on yourself? OK. You do you.

[@AM-qz6cm]

@@queent3343 is that what I said? Are medical doctors so infallible none could ever succumb to green, or ever be wrong on anything? And no, I wouldn't go to a Planned Parenthood or gender bender doctor for those things, so it's largely avoidable. Funny/true story; I have removed my own stitches before after a close friend who was a nursing student couldn't do it.

[@queent3343]

@@AM-qz6cm Such talent. Still stand by my post. Medicine is a service industry. If you don't like or trust your doctor find one you do trust and like. Pay more and get a concierge doctor who will do everything you tell him. Sorry you think Planned Parenthood has no purpose. Millions of women would disagree with you. And "gender bender" doctors wouldn't be interested in you if you don't need their services. I hope if you're every catastrophically ill that you can actually believe someone knows more than you and you will accept their help.

[@AM-qz6cm]

@@queent3343 your quips aren't as good as you think they are... Much like the leftist professionals seen in the documentary.

[@queent3343]

@@AM-qz6cm Sorry that you think bad quips are only made be "leftists." Lots of bad ones here by those on the very repressive right.

[@Esunhecho75]

I’ve watched this documentary at least 6 times and I love how Matt exposed those activists. Also it’s sad how brainwashed people are that they refuse to say what a woman is and or call a man who dresses like a woman a she. I would never give those people that satisfaction, I call them by their biological pronouns

[@Stormer13]

In a recent episode of his show, Matt used very similar terminology to yours Trent (ordered towards pregnancy or impregnation), so I think someone in his comments might have brought that up to him. I would love to see an interview with you and him talking about his future plans and the documentary.

[@shannonmaria22]

Excellent review!

[@CrockettsCabin]

This "awful American stuff" could not take hold where Walsh was in Africa. It is awful and it is distinctly American (at least it seems to be) but it is (partly, I think) a result of "too much" affluence and free time. We don't have enough REAL problems here so we are making them up. In other words, I don't think you need to worry about it. 👍. Good review, by the way, solid stuff.

[@TheThreatenedSwan]

Eh, I don't think America will have the energy to do it, and as things break down the West will quit subsidizing Africa's massive population growth, but places like South Africa are quite pozzed.

[@disguisedcentennial835]

It’s not distinctly American, it’s distinctly Jewish. This is in Europe and Canada, too. It’s even begun in Russia and was in Ukraine before it got invaded. But it’s not in Poland. Or Austria. The 2 countries that hate Jews.

[@boguslav9502]

its not the issue of too much free time, etc. Its the issue of there being literally no cultural censorship. In Africa or places that normality still exists there is extreme, extreme, cultural censorship. Nothing changes unless there is an explicit and very good reason for it to change.

[@endtheglobalistagenda2387]

This warped agenda, is not exclusive to Northern America, but most (if not all of) the so called 'Western World'. It isn't however prevalent in China, Eastern Europe, most of Africa...

[@onewildandcrazyguy9213]

@@disguisedcentennial835 ur silly. It exists in Austria. I was in Austria recently and I saw it. So sorry to upset your obsession with Jews and how they're the cause of everyone's problems

[@docverit2668]

No need to add the extra information that Trent claims is a shortcoming of the documentary. The simple answer is sufficient, and only if further challenged would there be a need to break it down further. "A woman is an adult human female" is an accurate statement in and of itself.

[@InterstellarDreams]

Gender critical feminist woman, here. NOT conservative, (although also seriously disillusioned with what passes for current-day "progressivism"), NOT conventionally religious, and just generally NOT a fan of imposed social gender norms, that so many religious conservatives glorify. Anyway... Don't get me wrong, I think it's AWESOME that Matt is doing this! And I think it's really important, as he's got a HUGE conservative + Christian following! And will therefore be able to reach WAY more people than someone like me, who's got no such following to speak of! I hope his documentary causes a HUGE stir, and truly starts to wake people up, that were previously asleep, to what's truly going on! It's great! However..? It just really, really irks me when conservative men, who most likely have not been following this issue for anywhere NEAR as long as women like me have, just sort of unthinkingly go: "oh, he is the FIRST to speak out about this! No one else is doing it!" When.. us gender critical women, and radical feminists in general, (I don't personally consider myself fully a rad fem, but I agree with them on SOME things, and recognize that they were most likely the first group of people to speak out against gender ideology, and anything else that tries to erase women), have been fighting this fight for bloody YEARS now! WAY before you guys had even started to wake up and smell the coffee! (In fact, the very word 'TERF', which is the MAIN OG slur hurled at anyone who opposes gender ideology, by trans activists..? Stands for Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist! NOT for Trans Exclusionary Religious Conservative! Go figure.) And..? We object to this shit on markedly different grounds than you do! Although there is plenty of overlap, too. Which is why I don't mind allying with conservatives who agree with me on this issue. But ultimately..? GCs and rad fems are AGAINST the imposition of gender norms, but FOR accepting biological sex as reality! But saying: "you are your sex, but these gender norms are bullshit, and you can still be EVERYTHING that you are, regardless!" While the conservative perspective..? Is, in simple, basic terms: "biological sex is real! Plus gender norms are great, and you should be following whatever rigid social gender norms society tries to push on your sex class! And be either a masculine man, or a feminine female!" Which is something us GCs very much oppose, and see as harmful and detrimental. ..Just had to point that out, because this is starting to bother me more and more. This whole thing about conservative men trying to claim they were the first ones to enter this fight! Because you're not. And your perspective on it is NOT the only possible way to oppose gender ideology, either! The way I see it, actually..? There are THREE basic schools as far as this issue is concerned! You've got the trans activists, you've got the conservatives, and then you've got the gender critical feminists. Which.. I'm the latter. And I would really, REALLY like for our existence, and importance, to be recognized as well. Thank you.

[@owlobsidian6965]

Thank you for your comment. While I was aware of terms like "TERF" and that there are feminists that are against trans ideology, I will admit I was not aware of any time line as to who made such and such an argument first. Perhaps it is because your view point, like many others, are pushed far from the mainstream. Any opinion that is not pro-trans is pretty much considered fringe by the mainstream, so someone like myself would almost have no chance of happening upon your ideas unless I was specifically seeking them out. I think that is the reason you don't hear much acknowledgment of it. The conservative/Christian scene is also much bigger, and therefore has the loader and most noticed voice. "before you guys had even started to wake up and smell the coffee!" Most likely true. The religious conservative side never really was in the loop of lgbt matters, so we would not have been aware of their goings on at the earliest stages. I also don't believe anyone is saying our perspective is the only one, it is simply the one that comes naturally from our particular cultural stand point. And just to touch upon the idea that conservatives insist on ridged gender norms. Most of us conservatives (men like myself) don't expect women to be in the kitchen making sandwiches and doing our laundry. While some (both men and women) prefer traditional roles, we are not fervently against any deviation. I myself know many women in "masculine" professions like law enforcement, and never once thought they were out of their "role". I only add this in the hope of easing the negative stereotype that has been placed on conservatives. Would you say that your point of view provides any arguments against trans ideology that the conservative side does not use and vice versa?

[@rethaf4387]

@@owlobsidian6965 You ask:: "Would you say that your point of view provides any arguments against trans ideology that the conservative side does not use and vice versa?" I am not the person you ask, but I will start with one answer: Radfems point out that the most likely kids to be sterilized by this are gay or future gay youths, autistic youths, and youth with mental health problems. They complain that many parents will rather have a "straight girl" (who is sexually neutered) than a gay boy, and rather have a straight "boy" (who can't reproduce) than a lesbian daughter. They see this as conversion therapy per definition. Conservatives who fight against gender ideology are not so likely to point that out, as some of their listeners may indeed prefer a neutered, "gender reassigned" "straight" child to a gay child.

[@owlobsidian6965]

@@rethaf4387 that's an interesting take, but I would have to disagree. Anyone who would be strongly opposed to a gay child would not see a trans child as the preferable option. And if the parents were trans affirming then they would not have an issue with a gay child to begin with. Anti-gay yet pro-trans do not go together.

[@rethaf4387]

@@owlobsidian6965 Several parents actually do say they were strongly anti-gay, then decided to trans their kids. And at least one person who used to work at the Tavistock gender clinic confirm that people trans their gay children. And conservatives indeed do not speak against transing *gay* youths. (They speak of transing youths, but do not mention a large percentage of them are gay.

[@rodriguezelfeliz4623]

15:12 LOVE how he backtracked on that lol

[@RMV1560]

I thoroughly enjoy your content Trent, and you have earned a strong subscriber in me🤛🏻

[@pjelpers]

Next movie should be "What is a parent?" Or "What is a child?" Seeing pro-choice politicians arguing about it being a woman's choice on when to become a parent and start a family, no one asks them "When does that happen? When do you become a parent?" If you're considering an abortion, it's already apparent you're a parent. And the pro-choice lie is the true war on women, on the child, and on the family. We need love and prayers for all. ... and to answer the questions, seems to me that I became a child when my mom and dad became parents, and that happened at conception. I may now be an adult, but I will always be their child, and that distinction came at conception.

[@thedualtransition6070]

The wonder of straw men! "What is a viable foetus" has been defined legally and a foetus is not a child - which is a birthed human being under the age of 18. The real war on children was the gutting of support for poor families, the gunning down of them in schools etc. Do you believe in supporting and protecting actual real children, even poor ones, or are you just as much an ideologue as the crazy "doctors" in the documentary? The rich will always get abortions, little Jennie will just go for an extended "vacation" in Paris.

[@matzmr]

no confusion about parent or child. why did you come up with those stupid questions?

[@pjelpers]

@@matzmr Because they're apparently relevant questions, just like the "stupid" question of "What is a woman?" So what is a parent? When do you become a parent?

[@angelalemos9811]

Or what is a human because apparently there are trans species lol

[@aerka0s760]

You should stop pushing your own ideology, which is basically : "women should be forced to keep children when they are pregnant because I am a dumb fuck religious bitch who cannot understand that life is not the same for everybody and circonstances are importants and wants to impose my point of view on others". Having the choice is important for women, and if you don't understand how, for almost all women, having an abortion is a really difficult choice physically and psychologically, then you are basically really stupid, egocentric and narrow minded. Now for "what is a child", you look at a dictionary but more importantly at the law, because this is a legal issue. And your other question "what is a parent", considering your overall comment, is juste a rhetorical question to blame people who are in favour of abortion by underlining the fact that they "should" consider themselves as a parent right when the woman becomes pregnant so they would have another moral obligation to keep the child, which is cruel and basically immoral.

[@nofragmentado]

That is true, If an animal is mutilated that will be animal abuse. So I don’t understand why we can not called the same when teenagers parent take them to do the same, but instead some people get offended to call it “mutilate” 🤔 Thank you Trent and thank you so much to Matt for such a documentary. Caring, loving, justice and TRUTH.

[@angusmcsnort5370]

Good review!

[@rexomusprime]

Thanks for sharing this Trent. You mention towards the end at 25:45 that over the ages people argue "That "insert crazy idea here" will never catch on." yet it does catch on. I agree, that is exactly how evil moves, slow and steady. Now younger and younger people, who lack real-world experience and wisdom, are the target. Something I have come to notice is that evil doesn't care about winning. Evil is aware that in the end, it will be defeated. For evil, It's not about winning, it's about burning down as much as possible before the trumpet sounds. To prevent, or at least reduce the amount of damage being done, we have to speak truth to people and not give in to the social pressure of accepting insanity just to get along. The people who encourage this or practice it need help and hope.

[@displaychicken]

Sex is different than gender Race is different than ethnicity Animal is different than species Height is different than tallness Weight is different than heaviness Eye colour is different than hue Hairiness is different than pilosity Etc. Therefore, though my appearance (and science) would say otherwise; I am in fact a 7 foot tall, 1000lb, bald, female, African-American, green-eyed, flamingo.

[@paulaaracena-sherck8154]

OMG I laughed so hard at this one! Thanks for that.

[@phi4721]

Live your truth and don't let anyone discourage you! Your identity is valid 🙌🙌

[@100rgroom]

The fact that parents haven't stormed these schools & hospitals shocks me !

[@a2tran814]

👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽Thank you very much Trent and Matt

[@denise5724]

Thank you !

[@laurachamberlain9591]

I think some of the people he interviewed were afraid of losing their jobs. They are being controlled by money.

[@HolyKhaaaaan]

I'm highly interested in your assessment of Eve Tushnet, especially her latest book "Tenderness". Speaking of solutions to the transgenderism question, it sounds like she has a really good answer to the emotional needs of this movement.

[@queent3343]

The only people who have a transgenderism question are those who aren't transgender. How does someone who isn't transgender understand what the "emotional needs" are of this "movement." What are the "emotional needs" of the heterosexual "movement?"

[@CPATuttle]

This topic does well in the algorithm. Hopefully newcomers check out your content

[@slow9573]

Keep up the good work, Trent!

[@arnoldpainal5885]

I think what Trent is missing, and what Matt clearly exposes is that even if you ask these people a factually answerable question they either have a delusional fantasy answer (we don't really know what the chicken thinks it is) or they end the conversation (the can you tell me what a cat is response or the I think this interview is over response when asked about how the hormone blockers are a castration drug or as in when asking the politician what is a woman).

[@RMV1560]

That’s a perfect way to describe it “demonic” a sinister evil hiding behind their charade that Matt exposes very simplistically when he shines a light on it.

[@Jessicarodriguezcastanon]

We need so much prayer, thank you for all that you do Trent 👏🏻

[@anakiyacreates]

The trailer always gives me chills!

[@squirrels24seven]

You should have him on your show. (i havent watched your video yet but in case you didnt mention it)

[@QuippersUnited]

While I understand your criticism for Matt not going in depth into *his* definition, the fact is, he *cannot* go into his definition. The people he's interviewing are snakes. They know how to manipulate a conversation to their advantage, so you can't provide them with the in to change the subject. If Matt provided these people with his definition at length, the interviewees would bring out the laundry list of technicalities that don't actually prove anything and will use those technicalities to dismiss Matt's point. In other words, if you give the ideologues the opportunity, the conversation will no longer be about what THEY are saying, but about what HE is saying, and the documentary falls flat. It's an exposé, and you can't do that if the subject goes off on a diatribe about the vague, buzzwordy nonsense they feed their college students every day.

[@loganjackson675]

I think there will eventually be a part 2 where the Daily Wire and Walsh will provide an argument for their own definition. Like you say, it’s pretty pointless to debate this with the gender ideologues because it will become a circular argument full of bad faith, but I think they can build and showcase his definition through the friendly/like minded interviews that they include. This particular doc was simply about showing that modern gender theorists will refuse to define their terms and answer obvious questions, and shining a light on that.

[@radiorain5665]

Trent, you are my inspiration. Thank you for always being courageous in telling the truth.

[@MegUSN52]

In regards to the Dr. Phil show, Matt Walsh has stated that the show edited out and omitted a lot of what he said. Just another reason I don’t watch Dr. Phil. And in regards of showing the documentary to your kids when they are older, well, if your kids are going to public schools they are already being groomed at an early age. I’m not sure where you are located, but in CA and NY, 6 year olds were being taught about self pleasure in schools. So if they are going to public schools I would recommend earlier than 10, unfortunately. If home schooled and Christian private school then I agree that older is better. But kids are highly sexualized at elementary age today in society.

[@craigwyatt3195]

subscribed because you support Matt and we need more people to speak up and make content regarding these issues

[@brianbalcer]

I find it impossible to keep my kids off of social media. They have phones. You take their phone away, they have numerous other items to get on social media wether it be a gaming console, an ipad, or your smart TV, or by using a friends device. They go to school where the majority of kids all share these whacky opinions, etc. At my kids school it is considered hip and cool to be unique and/or trans, or whatever made up gender they can think of. Their first day of school all the kids had to get up and state their preferred pronouns to make sure everyone labels them correctly and when turning in paperwork they need to include their pronouns by their name, etc. It almost forces kids to have these views. Our kids mostly have the opposite views of what their mother and myself have. Which isn't bad in it's own right, they can be their own persons. But, a lot of their views are just....... wrong(?) and kinda crazy. It feels totally helpless and hopeless as a parent. You can't speak up about any of it without being called a transphobe, homophobe, racist, or whatever.

[@disguisedcentennial835]

Dude, homeschool your kids. Public school has become the territory of Babylon. Homeschool your kids ASAP or you will lose them. Please listen to me. I’m Gen Z. 23 years old. Homeschool your kids.

[@boguslav9502]

Speak up and dont be afraid. By being afraid and not speaking up, not organising pressure with other parents you are literally supporting and accepting this. If you want your kids to not be consumed by this you need to actively create a space, or find them spaces and activities that are contrary to this. Also culture, culture culture. The most authentic thing is to figure out your ethnic culture, and then reject everything modern in favor of it. Cottagecore is an example of this. HanFu is an example of this. Setting up training time for you and your son (if you have one) is huge. Setting up and preparing him for some kind of major right of passage is also huge (say an actual amateur fight, hair cutting etc.) I understand what you are saying, and the issue is a lot of people say very general thigns with very little examples or a critical approach to these things which really leads nowhere. Im a not so young man anymore, 26 years old, no kids (because university has sucked 7 years from me, they be damned!) but I desire kids and having listened to a lot of younger men especially, and a lot of others who reflected on their life, culture is what we are missing and we are missing it completely. Dont pick and choose your ethnic culture, find it, search it, and embrace it in totality. Modernize it where it fails to be modern. The same goes for many things. Dont be afraid of getting your kids disciplined by having them play an instrument for one hour. heck maybe you do all these things already! In that case good for you. But from what ive gathered a lot of "children being lost" is them being left to their own devices and not being mentored by their parents and having no common activities. The most conservative and proper people ive met, in the case of men in particular, was those who for example trained with their fathers. Something I didnt have and it resulted in me becoming a genuine communist at one point.

[@businessacc179]

Don’t give up- keep teaching them the truth and pull them away from the evil in every way possible. You are responsible for them - keep fighting for them.

[@businessacc179]

Don’t give up- keep teaching them the truth and pull them away from the evil in every way possible. You are responsible for them - keep fighting for them.

[@Tartersauce101]

The African Tribe was my favorite part. They seemed so wholesome and happy.

[@javablossom]

Hi Trent, thank you for another great episode. Could you direct me to your findings on masks? I would like to see the stats you found. Thank you and God bless!

[@badger7781]

Hello, I can help out with your question. The best way to figure it out is to compare the number of covid cases from states that had the mask mandates vs the states that did not have mask mandates. The numbers can be found on the CDC’s website, and each state also has their own websites to track covid numbers.

[@javablossom]

@@badger7781 Everything I find says that masks helped to reduce C. It sounds like there are other reports that say otherwise but I cannot find them yet. I am looking to find what those sources are and I would like to review the findings. Thank you. :-)

[@kerid9658]

Even if they’ve realized they are wrong, they will argue and never admit it.

[@annafranc8081]

We need to pray to Holy Ghost for the fruit of humility for them and for us all. Say lots of glory to the Father prayer

[@AJanae.]

Well that is part of pride, something they celebrate

[@AM-qz6cm]

Kind of makes me want to move to Africa tbh. I had the same thought though 'oh no, he's introducing this crazy ideology, they're screwed now!'.

[@squishmallowfan025]

it's sort of fascinating...they keep tribal traditions but are obviously educated and have jobs etc (they'd have to).....the obvious giggling in the background is classic

[@mikethemonsta15]

Awesome!

[@parvezshaikh3205]

I couldn’t agree with you more when you said “ underlying evil”! I really sensed it

[@chosenone8408]

10:54 I agree, with this specific person, I refuse to acknowledge her credentials. I call her by her name, and I intentionally omit her degree. I will not honor a nutcase by calling her...you know the thing.

[@OpEditorial]

There was a point in history when we genuinely thought *icepick lobotomies were an effective cure for headaches and bad moods*, here's hoping the overly permissive ghouls that let this happen are prepared for the tsunami of lawsuits coming their way.

[@chadasonmcgraw8097]

I'm fat. Overweight. I need less sensitivity. I need to be pushed to the point where I have no choice but to turn my life around. It's almost been a year on my weightloss journey. I've lost fat, gained muscle, but still need to be pushed. I still have changes to make... less sensitivity. Be direct with love.

[@plethondimos576]

Nobody cares, stop writing bullshit and go to the gym. Love yourself.

[@13Voorheespt2]

San Francisco gets a lot of hate and for sure there is much that needs to be cleaned up. That being said,went there before COVID hit and it was a fantastic time. It's incredibly beautiful as a region, misty redwood forests and the bay,and you gotta love those blustery cold summers. I was really bummed when they tore down Candlestick and don't forget that JPII had mass there.

[@TheTrueNicklose]

Trent is the teacher I never had.

[@wamono_]

As much as we may think that Africa hasn't seen this kind of madness, I'd assert it is taking root among youngsters and mostly especially among our female counterparts

[@pikeman6774]

It’s middle aged women in the US that really started it here as well.

[@westonmeyer3110]

10 years ago black Americans were voting against gay marriage in referendums, now they are pretending to be for trans issues. Their kids will legitimately be for trans issues, their grandkids will be trans. It will take hold of Africans just like it has taken hold of a lot of African immigrants in America.

[@daddada2984]

I agree with this review.. Hope your pope will also say something about this issue & hope he give a truthful, godly, strong comments...

[@turningproductive]

Thank you trent

[@YovanypadillaJr]

Will the abortion course always be free for patrons?

[@lunafencoven]

That lady with the creepy smile is the perfect reperesetative face of the movement. The smile is so clearly fake which is a deceptive behaviour and why do u have to be deceptive if you're on the side of good?

[@JaySeamus]

Sweeet, a Trent Horn upload

[@megmorrill9600]

Social studies are not only anti-scientific but anti-ethics and thus immoral in essence. I remember sitting in a sociology seminar where a case study was presented for us to analyze. Rather quickly I realized that the consequences presented in that case were directedly related to un-ethical behavior. However when I pointed out their problem, the professor was quick to point out that NO moral judgements are allowed in sociology. To which I replayed: "well if we can't point out to a problem, then we can't logically be asked for a solution either."

[@kellyh8218]

I think his interviews in Africa defined women pretty well according to your suggestions …

[@cc-ei7nn]

The best documentary I ever watched I live in Morocco. the most have no idea there is a thing like this going on in place that seems to be a first world nation and spacial something that is so obvious it's just insane. I guess when you just worrying about making a living you don't have time to over think obvious stuff

[@kubaterlikowski8031]

Can I see the documentary if I live in the UK?

[@raphaelrobles8104]

I want to say that Matt briefly mentions defining a woman or man as someone inclined towards pregnancy or inclined towards impregnating respectively. Very brief, and not those exact words, but I wish he said more on it.

[@Men_In_Jesus]

I'm so blessed that I've had crazy temptations because I now KNOW that it is 'demonic'.

[@ashtree5957]

Edit: When I made this comment I didn't even know there was someone that identified as wolf in this film. I just got to the end of the video. 😅 I accidentally ended on the same point you did. The future is looking bleak. Someone would end up saying the height example you used isn't comparable because a major argument that I haven't heard much of lately but used to quite a few years ago was that the brains of transgender people are shown to function like the one in the body of someone with the gender they identify with. I suppose that argument isn't used as much today because you can be anything you want regardless of the logic (or absence of logic) used to come to the conclusion you are xx, xy, xz, yz, zz, or zz!#$&*. People used to scoff when others would say "if we accept gay people now eventually it's going to be ok to have sex with animals." Well... it's ok to be one now, to identify with something barely human, marry whatever and whoever you want, have a wolf spirit, so I'm just here waiting for b34stiality to become legalized to.

[@kevydjegnan3393]

Where can I watch the full documentary?

[@theSvarg]

When it's coming to Netflix?