1957 Chrysler Imperial vs Cadillac Dealer Promo Film Mopar is a registered trademark of Chrysler Group LLC. Master Tech series training materials are the property of Chrysler Group LLC and are used with permission. MyMopar.com
Пікірлер: 169
@tombrown18989 ай бұрын
I saw a gold 1955 Imperial today, cruising down the street where I live here in Louisville. Sure looked classy!
@johnnyhawkins434 жыл бұрын
I love them all from back in the day!!!!!!!!!
@keith5365 жыл бұрын
The Imperial roof line was distinctive. Cadillac shared it's roof with Chevy, Pontiac, Olds and Buick.
@SmartassX14 жыл бұрын
The Cadillac roof was aerodynamic where as the Imperial had a pointless big ...thing across it.
@johnwarnick12593 жыл бұрын
If you had a Caddy back in 1958, nobody would mistake it for a Buick, Olds, or Pontiac!
@MarinCipollina2 жыл бұрын
Cadillac shared its roofline with Chevrolet, Pontiac, half the Buicks and none of the Oldsmobiles.
@danielulz16402 жыл бұрын
@@MarinCipollina Cadillac shared its roof lines only with senior Buicks. While the Pontiac Bonneville and Chevrolet Impala had similar style roof lines, they were not the same nor interchangeable.
@MarinCipollina2 жыл бұрын
@@danielulz1640 I never suggested they were interchangable, only that they shared the same appearance, that is to say, the "lines" of the design.
@ew1usnr8 жыл бұрын
I want a 1958 Imperial!
@terrysellers67123 жыл бұрын
You can buy them relatively cheap! I suggest you call the Imperial club. I bet you can buy a good one for under 20k!
@rlane636 жыл бұрын
After watching this promo film I'm selling my electric car and heading for the nearest Chrysler dealer. The Imperial is graceful, spacious and probably more economical than any Tesla.
@mitch300sdl8 жыл бұрын
100 foot stop from 60 , four drum brakes, no antilock brakes ? If that's true it beats even 2015 cars
@philojudaeusofalexandria9556 Жыл бұрын
60-0 in 100 feet with heat-faded 4-wheel drum brakes on a 5000lb car with crappy small-treadwidth 50s bias-ply tires. Meanwhile 2022 high-end sports cars weighing ~3000-3500lbs with multiple-piston huge-diameter cross-drilled/slotted + vented 4-wheel discs, with ABS/EBD/Brake Assist and incredibly sticky, wide, track-ready, extreme-performance radial tires can barely do 60-0 under 100ft. Makes total sense.
@whershkowitz46698 жыл бұрын
ahh..those wild and crazy Exner fins...☺
@HoosierDaddy_6 жыл бұрын
100 feet from 60mph! Bull! Only The worlds best sports cars in 2018 can do that. I like the imperial, but the caddy is very nice also.
@philojudaeusofalexandria9556 Жыл бұрын
Yeah... 60-0 in 100 feet with heat-faded 4-wheel drum brakes on a 5000lb car with crappy small-treadwidth 50s bias-ply tires. Meanwhile 2022 high-end sports cars weighing ~3000-3500lbs with multiple-piston huge-diameter cross-drilled/slotted + vented 4-wheel discs, with ABS/EBD/Brake Assist and incredibly sticky, wide, track-ready, extreme-performance radial tires can barely do 60-0 under 100ft. Makes total sense.
@TheTrollMastah2 ай бұрын
Wow almost like there’s 60+ years of improvement and research since 1958 🤡
@harpersferry597 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the filmstrips we watched in grade school, with the "ding" on the record telling the teacher to advance to the next frame. The presentation is a bit campy by 2017 standards, but we shouldn't apply 21st century worldviews and culture to the 50s. After all, this was high-tech in 1958! 😉
@1983jblack Жыл бұрын
Advertisement even today in 2022 is campy
@martyroth29538 жыл бұрын
Ages ago I appreciated the handling and power of my white 1958 Imperial convertible with the 392 ci Hemi and Torque-Flyte. That noted, today I cannot say enough as to the comfort and styling of our white 1954 Cadillac convertible with turquoise Haartz canvas convertible top, wonderbar radio, and all of the power options --a first class ride ! It draws almost as much attention as our yellow 1941 Caddy Convertible Coupe Both are great examples, and I'd like to have the white Imperial back alongside our Cadillacs, Packard, and brass-era Hudson !
@emilnouguier68525 жыл бұрын
Gasaholics, guzzlers, big poluters
@HITEKSTRANGER2 жыл бұрын
Wow ! You were loaded ! 👍🇨🇦
@rizzlerazzleuno47335 жыл бұрын
These slide shows for salesmen.........Oh boy, a bowl of corn pone 🤡.........Don't miss the video of Jay Leno's 1958 Imperial Convertible. He wisely put disc brakes on it and uses radial tires. Too bad Imperial in 1958 did not have those features, then they might have had more luck getting GM folks to switch. Starting in 1955 it was just "Imperial", no longer called Chrysler Imperial. 🙂 Thanks for uploading these slide shows.
@billbright17557 жыл бұрын
You don't see many car sales men with a cape and a swagger stick these days.
@billbright17557 жыл бұрын
That guy got his cape stuck under the brake pedal and caused a crash. His cousin what's the Diff and his brother big Diff will mourn his passing. He still owed money on his puffy directors pants taxes too.
@super40387 ай бұрын
@@billbright1755 on god
@yumpinyiminy9635 жыл бұрын
Too bad we don't see many Imperials on the auction block. Probably because nobody says it rides like a Imperial. Really nice cars when working correctly.
@jtp5856 жыл бұрын
Imperial takes the cake, although I`m biased just a bit...
@AryDontSurf5 жыл бұрын
My Chevy pickup has torsion bars on the front end. Chrysler sued them for it and as time goes by I'm starting to realize how unique it is. Thanks Mopar.
@devonmask51924 жыл бұрын
British maker Austin used front torsion bars in the mid-30's. They weren't exactly a new idea.
@chrisrumble26652 жыл бұрын
@@devonmask5192 Never Austin. Riley and Morris did though.
@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv8 ай бұрын
What year Chevrolet
@AryDontSurf8 ай бұрын
@@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv 1960 Chevrolet Apache 10 🫡
@huskyflylangley60535 ай бұрын
Citroen had torsion bar suspension in the 1935 Traction Avant.
@richardthefox34127 жыл бұрын
Frankly both look great to me.
@THEDUDE9126 жыл бұрын
Both classic American icons
@tommywatterson52762 жыл бұрын
The GM coil spring suspension was exquisitely smooth. You rode over bumps and potholes...the driver never felt them. Chrysler chose torsion bars with leaf springs in rear. Okay, but was a firmer ride. It had to be. The torsion bars were on the front drive Olds Toronado and Cadillac Eldorado. Coils in rear. Crowded up front was why torsion bars were used.
@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv8 ай бұрын
Did Chrysler get to litigate!?
@RADIUMGLASS3 жыл бұрын
Cadillac was a flashy Buick in these days. The Imperial body was a completely different car from the rest of the Chrysler lineup.
@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv8 ай бұрын
Having said that, the Buick was a great car. Imperial I agree was way ahead of the lot in this era.
@alphonsocarioti512 Жыл бұрын
That Imperial was the Cadillac of cars!
@drosera886 жыл бұрын
I don't know if I'd trust car buying advice that came from a hallucination.
@brainwithani56932 ай бұрын
Name one car dealership that doesn't hallucinate.
@ChristopherGaslighted2 ай бұрын
But you can trust Jesus, for He is LORD!
@MadMax0696 жыл бұрын
5:06 "BUT THAT SPARE TIRE TAKES UP A LOT OF SPACE HERE." WTH????? HOW DOES CHANGING THE SPARE TIRE POSITION FROM VERTICAL TO HORIZONTAL MAKE 'MORE' SPACE? THESE GUYS BACK THEN WERE GRASPING AT EVERY SINGLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRYSLER VS. CADILLAC AND TURNING ALL DIFFERENCES INTO SOMETHING INFERIOR BY CADILLAC'S. CRAZY!!
@fairfaxcat13124 жыл бұрын
MadMax069 And the very thing that sets one apart will the next year be meaningless because it will no longer be exclusive or it will be deleted all together. Then other distinctives will have to be seized upon to achieve some tiny advantage against the competitor.
@kevinvoyer50533 жыл бұрын
Sure that’s true if you needed to fill the trunk with liquids, that can fill every nook an cranny. But in USEABLE space the Imperials tire, laid flat over in one corner, leaves more usable space. There was no comparison between these two, except in price! Both were very expensive.
@andrewwanner6855 Жыл бұрын
58 Imperial looks were very minimally changed from quad headlight 57 models. The rear is exactly the same. The 58 Caddy's rear fins slanted backward, where the 57's slanted forward.
@bertgrau92465 жыл бұрын
I like the 1960 Cadillac best. Looked smoother, long and rode great.
@dougkoudelka30895 жыл бұрын
I like the bullet tailights of the '59 Caddy.
@jgrothou3 жыл бұрын
I think the ‘60 was a cleaner design.
@CommodoreCaravan19814 жыл бұрын
@ 13:44 you can see the spokes on the add-wheel from the Imperial but not at the Caddy also the blur-effects of the grass/background (much more @ the Caddy). so i guess the Imperial was driven much slower over the hump than the Caddy. the PR-departement of Chrysler just knew why they show single pic's instead of a film ;) . however: in my opinion the cars back then looks much better, unique and weren't rolling computers.
@edmondocerza42925 жыл бұрын
How advertising has changed, last thing you do these days is bash the competition, actually praise it so that you can earn trust. How gullible people must have been those days. Good old days my arse!
@kevinvoyer50533 жыл бұрын
Now here we are 63 years later, with Imperial having been out of the market for decades! With Chrysler in lean tough times, building great Pickups and decent high power performance cars, along with decent family vehicles. But sadly no Imperial.
@chrisbrown3925 Жыл бұрын
The imperial looks to be a decade newer than the cad...the roof really kills it...
@albertcarello6192 жыл бұрын
The Imperial has a better automatic transmission because it has a torque converter and this transmission is more performance oriented. I like too that the transmission has a kickdown band that's adjustable to insure positive full throttle downshifts!
@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv8 ай бұрын
Absolutely the Torqueflite was way ahead.
@kdkatz-ef2us2 жыл бұрын
I have owned both, and I must admit that the caddy was an overall better car. Imperial has its strong points such as torsion bars
@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv8 ай бұрын
In which areas was the Cadillac better and imperial better?
@jimbeck32304 жыл бұрын
If push button shifting and torsion bar suspension was so great why isn’t it still available on Imperial? Wait a second, come to think of it why isn’t Imperial still available?
@paulsheehan7892 жыл бұрын
i l like the looks of of the 1955 imperial over the 1958
@ilingwang11682 жыл бұрын
There’s no amount of Chrysler dealer promo film that will convince me to choose a 1958-60 Imperial over a 58-60 Cadillac. However, i do prefer the 65-66 Imperials over the 65-66 Cadillacs. Can’t go wrong with Imperials, Cadillacs and Lincolns back then.
@TheOzthewiz6 жыл бұрын
They said nothing about resale value of either vehicle. Considering that the Imperial is SO MUCH BETTER in EVERY category, you would expect the Imperial to hold it's value better. But, everyone knows that Chrysler products (except Jeep) resale value drops like a rock.
@calvillocobra985 жыл бұрын
I take the cadillac any day 😍😍
@chrisbrown3925 Жыл бұрын
Chrysler sure liked its mini pitchman...my favorite is still Tech...
@lori2286 жыл бұрын
Imperial best
@santiagorubio8335 жыл бұрын
Say what you want, for some reason always Cadillac sales have been much higher than Chrysler. Do you think that people who buy luxury American cars are unintelligent or snobbish?
@TheSpiker4sure5 жыл бұрын
Ha ha, I test drove both these cars in 58 and NO ONE liked the friggin dash mounted turn signal lever. Why it took Chrysler 6 years to admit it was a dumb ass idea is anyones guess. For ride I like the Imperial, for looks and interior comforts it was the Caddy all the way. Of course I bought a Chevy, they were both way to expensive for me.
@zxtenn8 жыл бұрын
Imperial could NEVER stop in 100 feet from 60, that's even a short stop by todays standards
@fairfaxcat13124 жыл бұрын
jim dandy Chrysler engineers determined that it did there “to the rescue.” Maybe not every single Imperial but close to it. Imperial probably had bigger and more advanced brakes.
@myavo Жыл бұрын
wonderful, pure corn.
@bubbaclinton11055 жыл бұрын
I'll take the 392 Hemi.
@Nunofurdambiznez3 жыл бұрын
LOL! Diff Rance!! Corny and yet clever, love it!
@5610winston8 жыл бұрын
How would a Torsion Level Packard have done at 13:05?
@super40387 ай бұрын
we see you Lorenzo
@oliasofsunhillow71165 жыл бұрын
Your title should say Imperial v Cadillac!
@smellsuperb12 жыл бұрын
The absolute unadulterated bias in these "unbiased" ads of the 50's and 60's is so unexpectedly hilarious 🤣
@GuitarMan226 жыл бұрын
torsion ride is probably a better technology over coil - the only real benefit of the imperial
@robertjackson88268 жыл бұрын
the Cadillac is beautiful
@zxtenn6 жыл бұрын
ALWAYS was
@arnesahlen27042 жыл бұрын
*Not* Chrysler Imperial! Imperial became its own marque in 1955 - for 20 years, then again in early '80s.
@zzoinksАй бұрын
The imperial stops FAST. Though both stopped better than i expected from ancient brake designs.
@jgrothou3 жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t want to shift gears with my left hand.
@Ian-of9oi Жыл бұрын
I prefer the Cadillac but will say the Imperial looks more modern. If this was 1958 I don’t know how I would feel.
@pablocasanola93877 жыл бұрын
i like 57 Eldorado
@TGBTG77018 жыл бұрын
That Imperial is a fine automobile but, it is not even close to the 1957 and 1958 Cadillac Eldorado Broughams. They cost over 13k in 1957 that would be about 112k today, I am sorry, but this Cadillac will always be the top dog.
@fishwax63717 жыл бұрын
Imperial is far classier and more beautiful.
@jkdm76537 жыл бұрын
Always has been the American top dog!
@thomasflory62407 жыл бұрын
I agree caddy is far & away top dog
@cindys18196 жыл бұрын
The Eldorado was a special small elite issue those years. It was not the general Cadillac product. The Cad has the edge on solid heavy duty structure. But for knock out super styling which defined the '57-58 era, the Imperial is an American super icon..... Uh, BTW, if you ever get an imperial, convert to the biggest modern disc brakes as a first priority. The stock bellows brakes is a real strongly questionable system.....
@albertopancotti34696 жыл бұрын
Cindy S the Cadddy shared a Buik and Oldsmobile body. The Imperial is from a new body line including all different axles, brakes and with the Torsion bar front end there is much less under steer compared to the Caddy. Tests were done on both 1958 models to compare handling, braking, performance, you name it. The Imperial stops way quicker handles better and smoother with specially made tires just for the imperial. During the later years these cars were getting used in globe Darby's. The Imperial was banned because it was so strong in structure they couldn't demolish it ! But I do agree Jay Leno just bought a 58 Imperial and has installed all new discs. A 2nd owner car which was driven around with Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin!
@HITEKSTRANGER2 жыл бұрын
Corny as corny can be , but they speak the truth ! Imperial is absolutely gorgeous.
@zabijaqzoltan84424 жыл бұрын
Love these old US car adverts. I see the retardtainment for general public isn't a ""new thing".
@Coodeville Жыл бұрын
Did Elvis have an Imperial?
@tbamagic Жыл бұрын
But But...what about the 392 hemi engine? Did I miss that???
@loveisall55202 ай бұрын
Poor MOPAR still didn't get it, it seems. Cadillac owners wanted constancy in their cars' appearance and not to look obsolete after a year or two. They even highlighted the great value that a used Cadillac could be for a new owner. This '58 was a great car apart from indifferent assembly. The worst part on these was the turn signal lever and it amazes me that it took so many years (and perhaps Elwood Engel) to finally correct that poor design. The amazing part to me is that MOPAR used the same basic underpinnings from 1957 through 1966 and it was still a great car to the end!
@santiagorubio8335 жыл бұрын
None Chrysler, Dodge or Plymouth car run in the principal Nascar races of 1957 and 1958 (Orange Speedway 500, Daytona Beach and other). There run and won Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Chevrolet and Ford cars. If Chrysler cars were so powerful, so excelent suspension, so good brakes as this biassed video intend to demonstrate, the situation in that famous races had been totally different.
@dr75844 жыл бұрын
giant limousines when lard was considered a mark of status and luxury. while Cadillac still exists 60 years later, every guy knows that Imperial was the most indestructible choice for demolition derbies
@crankychris2 Жыл бұрын
The '55 had much better styling, and much less garish chrome than the '58's, IMO.
@lequebecoislefrancais4334 жыл бұрын
I take the Cady
@kaiserbill57118 жыл бұрын
Diff Rance - Please - they must have thought their sales force was a bunch of dolts.
@BillRalens6 жыл бұрын
I love diff france styling!
@TheSpiker4sure5 жыл бұрын
They were right.
@OsbornTramain8 жыл бұрын
It's an Imperial, not a Chrysler....different brand of car than a Chrysler....totally different body too and interior.
@lamontbrewer24406 жыл бұрын
Do imperial have the same motor as Chrysler?
@bertgrau92465 жыл бұрын
@@lamontbrewer2440 Yes the Chrysler engine were the same as imperial after all the imperial was a Chrysler product
@michaelmartinez13453 жыл бұрын
I sure would like to see that 392 HEMI under the hood!!!
@LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv8 ай бұрын
In styling the imperial seems to belong in another , newer generation. The 1959-60 and 1961-1964 era seem to be more comparable to the 1957 Imperial. The 1961 New Style JFK Lincoln was as large a leap over the opposition as what the 1957 Imperial was to its opposition. Whilst a large emphasis is made of the Cadillac not having as much advance over its opposition than the imperial however I'm of the opinion that the changes were much more required in the imperial rather than the Cadillac. The 1954 imperial was a dated look even when it was new in my opinion.
@vladilenkalatschev4915Ай бұрын
I would choose Cadillac
@scottpatterson41056 жыл бұрын
There's a reason Mopar was and still is #3 of the Big 3....and the Imperial no longer exists.
@rodati56154 жыл бұрын
People in 2020 be like: "that little guy is sutch a bad animation." People in 1958 be like: "WHAT..HOW...THIS IS WITCHCRAFT!!!!
@TheTrollMastah2 ай бұрын
I still like the Cadillac more
@pjimmbojimmbo19907 ай бұрын
I have Never heard a Song about an Imperial, make that, any Chrysler made Car. Never even hear of one Mentioned in any Song.
@pl56243 жыл бұрын
Chrysler division? Supposibly imperial was its own brand...
@jgrothou3 жыл бұрын
What is a long hair
@dougkoudelka30895 жыл бұрын
That treadle vac brake power booster on the Caddy was only used for one year-1958. Crap system.
@bobdavis33572 ай бұрын
Casdy looks A LOT better here.
@thoughtfinder6 жыл бұрын
What some people don't understand or see with there own eyes is Cadillac was nothing more then a glorified Buick. If you 1958 Buick Roadmaster against a 1958 Cadillac they are nearly identical. Only difference is the front face grill and taillights. Buick and Cadillac for years shared the same body style. With exception to Eldorado Cadillac was a glorified Buick. Imperial up to 1968 was Imperial only. Imperial didn't or never shared any body designs with Chrysler Dodge or Plymouth. Imperial was it's own unique car and style
@4gauge105 жыл бұрын
There's a big difference between a Buick and a Cadillac,interiors are totally different,the wheelbase was totally different,it had features that the Buick never had,bigger engine,heavier transmission longer interior,thicker heavier frame. The Buick never have a V-8 until 1955, they always ran straight-8's, Cadillac had V-8's,V-12's,V-16's, dating all the way back as far back as 1910.
@andyleibrook60125 жыл бұрын
Buick had a V8 [322 Nailhead] in 1953. Buick had the larger engine from 59-63 with the 401 & 425 vs the 390.
@4gauge105 жыл бұрын
@@andyleibrook6012 Caddy had a 429/472 during that time.
@andyleibrook60125 жыл бұрын
Nope, the 429 didn't come out until 1964. The biggest Caddy had before that was a 390. If you want to nitpick, Cadillac was also using a Oldsmobile tranny while Buick had it's own.
@4gauge105 жыл бұрын
@@andyleibrook6012 Buick use the same transmission all of them did, I should know my great uncle used to owned a few roadmasters.
@redtra2369 ай бұрын
Stopping distance with faded brakes is a flat out lie even really light modern cars with 4 wheel disk brakes have a hard time doing that
@keithhunt34985 жыл бұрын
The Imperial was just one car, Cadillac has more than one model...Cadillac are still on the road in 2019..the the imperial?
@Elizabethandfamily6 жыл бұрын
Cadillac is beautiful the 1959 Cadillac more so the imperial looks dated by 59
@peterpanassow78144 жыл бұрын
Diff Rance??? Hahahaha!!! 😂
@RivieraByBuick8 жыл бұрын
heh, as for me from 2015 the Caddy is more beautiful
@WAQWBrentwood8 жыл бұрын
although, the 1959 Cadillac was a direct response to these Forward Look Imperials.
@5610winston8 жыл бұрын
+WAQWBrentwood Yeah, but Imperial had something Cadillac didn't: "Ex" Exner. The Forward Look was carefully developed for '57, and the '59 GM models were the result of a desperate catch-up program trying to copy rather than innovate. I think Chrysler Corporation's problems by '58 to '60 were more a response to the poor build quality of the '57 models than to the styling.
@WAQWBrentwood8 жыл бұрын
+5610winston Another problem was Chrysler corps historic muddled marketing. Imperial was a separate marque from 1955-1975, Yet this 1958 filmstrip (made in '57) was presented by the Chrysler Division (as distinct from Chrysler Corporation). That would be like GM producing a film extolling Cadillac, presented by the Buick Division.
@fairfaxcat13128 жыл бұрын
+WAQWBrentwood Great point. If Imperial is a separate division why isn't the Imperial division and not the Chrysler division putting this on. As for sales, conflating Imperial with Chrysler unnecessarily called up in peoples' minds the poor build quality of all the rushed '57 Chrysler products EXCEPT the Imperial which had a separate plant and extra quality control in those days.
@jkdm76537 жыл бұрын
Perfect example of the "muddled marketing"!
@joseduranjr31525 жыл бұрын
I’ll take the 58 Cadillac. So Elegant
@johngillett57047 жыл бұрын
didn't really care for some of the styling
@willpoundstone718 жыл бұрын
Looks like both cars got uglier from 1955 to 1958
@WAQWBrentwood8 жыл бұрын
in 1958 Cadillac, Imperial and Lincoln all looked different, and none were the bland gray blobs we have now!
@christolbert4628 Жыл бұрын
No comparison to the Cadillac.
@SmartassX14 жыл бұрын
The Cadillac looks a lot better in most places. Except for the door handles. And how can they argue about trunk? The Cadillac clearly has a twice as big trunk. I would value that space way more than that allegedly better look.
@bobhoward66762 жыл бұрын
Man, That '58 Caddy was one of the best looking of all 50's cars. the Imperial was good for a boat anchor.
@terribelbliss96467 жыл бұрын
I do not care for the trunk lid detail on the Imperial. Seems like it would accumulate water or ice.
@tbamagic Жыл бұрын
Man, these sales promo films were sure full of BS.....
@joecool97392 жыл бұрын
Lincoln must have been absolutely embarassed sharing the road with these 2 abominations back in 1958 Can you imagine the classy square elegance of a 1957 Continental MK II or a 1958 Lincoln Premiere riding alongside these gaudy monstrosities?
@martyduncan26363 жыл бұрын
I’ll take a Cadillac any day! They’re still around and Imperial basically became a New Yorker Brougham 🙄
@michaelwhite2823Ай бұрын
I'm about ready to take a squat on dif rance. He's annoying
@joelpierce39403 жыл бұрын
You are talking like a long hair 😂😂😂😂
@AliAlali-rf7zi2 жыл бұрын
Cadillac 🥇🥇🥇🏅
@iancole9313 жыл бұрын
Disgraceful advertising. Clutching at straws if you ask me. The differences are insignificant in all aspects. Power of suggestion syndrome. i.e. believe what they say because they told you so. So it must be true.
@gtpcruiser023 жыл бұрын
How can anyone with normal eyesight think that ugly Imperial is a better looking vehicle than the Cadillac? Imperial has a hideous rear end.
@MarinCipollina2 жыл бұрын
That toilet seat on the rear deck lid didn’t help.. other than that it was fine and relevant for the era.