Nailed to the Cross? - Hebrew Gospel Pearls #24 | NehemiasWall.com

[@arevavaful]

Wow! Excellent teaching. Thank you 💕

[@marsonofjo344]

Paul did not teach that "the Torah is abolished". Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch did. Just look at his letter to the Magnesians.

[@deano6178]

The letter J did not exist until 1548 A.D. They changed the names of Yahova or YHWH, Yashua and the Sabbath, which the Church had no authority to change.

[@damenji]

I am crying I am a poor man but today I am rich thank you for sharing.

[@CoquiUnlimitedOfficial]

Well said! ❤️

[@augellog]

The Living Torah said: "Do not think I came to abolish myself!!!"

[@joyceobeys6818]

Amen!

[@helenahtheisraeli..5731]

HalleluYah

[@williamweirjr9749]

Because Moses said that He is the Prophet we must listen to. (abolish himself)

[@eyeinthesky7336]

You can't read or Understand hebrew idioms... Jesus is more than the torah... Paul himself refutes the torah more than 48 times... are you blind?

[@davidwalsh9850]

I really have enjoyed the teachings and the conversations these two men of God have had. From you both I have gained a wider and deeper understanding of The Word of God. Thank you to both men & ALL the praise, honor & glory be to our Heavenly Father. He, our Father deserves thanks for ALL go things!

[@larsh.alhaug1771]

There were no opposite teaching between Yeshua and Shaul. See what Paul/Shaul says to Felix in Acts 24:14. He believed EVERYTHING in the Law and the Prophets. To believe in Hebrew implies belive and do/practice.

[@bobirving6052]

Paul was a liar though. Liars lie.. Is there a chance a liar would lie to Felix?

[@yowwwwie]

Every time I listen to you both I get a deep sense of how decent you are....to each other, to us to the world at large. Of all of the conversations I have watched, I think this this one is very important because it shows the "Paul" (either/or) and the "James" (both/and) perspectives to be the source of difficulties in the emerging church. יוי

[@marysears4545]

So much to learn and understand. Very grateful for all the research you have done and passed on to us.

[@dianathomas2674]

Thank you so much for sharing. The state of Christianity is truly upsetting. How do people get around what Jesus said, and spread false teachings about abolishing instructions given by the LORD?

[@alainlevin6965]

Dear Néhémie i pray you accept yeshua as your machia Thank you for your dedication

[@vincentp7344]

Love is the fulfillment of the law

[@harveyhutchinson8266]

“If you love me, keep my commandments”

[@LeketRischl]

Nehemiah & Keith do a fantastic job of investigating the meanings of important textual issues.

[@doraa.urquilla3647]

AMEN!!! THIS IS EXCELLENT, AMAZING, GREAT, and share this in Facebook and I hope many of my beloved brothers and sisters of my ex congregation will see why I changed my way to live as a believer and try to live by the TORAH, by the GRACE OF GOD they will understand the truth words of YESHUA, TODA RABAH to both of you, and SHALOM!!

[@elishaeickhoff5040]

Shalom! I've tried to sign up for the "plus" section on your website, but the link attached to the "sign up" button is broken, and it keeps sending me to the membership log in page (which doesn't allow me to set up a new log in). Would you be so kind as to have someone fix it, so that we can watch the "plus" and "plus plus" sections of this study? You've "whet my whistle," with this appetizer, so-to-speak, and now I'm craving the full-course meal :) Thanks!

[@Mahalalel3]

Well done Mr Deleoco, YOU UNDERSTAND ! It is very heartening to know there are people like you who see and hear and that can help others understand and appreciate in some measure as YeHoshua's Kingdom is coming and is just around the bend IMO.

[@911EVERLASTINGGOSPEL]

Torah is Life!!!

[@rapturebound197]

Yes..Torah is life.. no arguments there .. the problem is you can't, don't and have never kept the Torah to the level hashem demands of you. The just shall live by faith in Yeshuas atoning🩸and merciful work at Calvary's cross ✝️. To Him be the Glory.. forever! Amen 🕎✝️ .

[@911EVERLASTINGGOSPEL]

@@rapturebound197 Riddle me this. IF Messiah did what no man could do or would do, and died in OUR place, then WHY did Messiah say that YOU had to pick up YOUR upright stake and FOLLOW HIM and LOSE YOUR LIFE for HIS SAKE or YOU were NOT worthy?? Please let me know how you explain that ???

[@911EVERLASTINGGOSPEL]

​@@rapturebound197 Matthew 10:38-39. FYI .. Both of these verses were changed in later bibles, along with subbing a upright stake {stauros) into a pagan Cross (tav) Matthew 10:38-39 - CodexSin Whoever does not take up their ϲταυρον - 👉OF HIM👈 and follow after👉ME👈 is👉NOT👈worthy of me. The having lost his life for the sake of me, will discover it {OLDEST KNOWN TRANSLATION} See CodexSin

[@911EVERLASTINGGOSPEL]

@@rapturebound197 Matthew 10:38-39 - CodexSin Whoever does not take up stauros 👉OF HIM👈 and follow after👉ME👈 is👉NOT👈worthy of me. The having lost his life for the sake of me, will discover it {OLDEST KNOWN MANUSCRIPT}

[@rapturebound197]

@911EVERLASTINGGOSPEL took me a minute to realize you're a JW.. it now makes sense why your trolling a yt channel that discusses the name Yehhovah. Good luck working your way to heaven. Take care.

[@gregrice1354]

Thank you so much Dr. Gordon and Minister Johnson. You too energetic, enthusiastic, joyful students of God's Word are an amazing team, bring forth amazing fruits of depth of better understanding, context, dates of origin, and language used. These are help resolve unnecessary divisions among all believers in the God of the Bible, Gentiles and Jews, and even as testimony for those who will have to endure the Tribulation, the Great Tribulation that will challenge the belief in powerful ways unlike any that have happened before on earth. Your website needs more active circulation among serious believers and students of the Bible. (And among Catholics too! 8-D - I"m kidding! My parents and 7 siblings are all still Catholic.)

[@monafawver805]

🔯🕎SO TOTALLY ENJOY BOTH OF YOU AND YOUR TEACHINGS. I'VE LEARNED SO MUCH WHICH HAS ONLY STRENGTHENED MY DESIRE TO CONTINUE TO WALK THE TORAH. THANK YOU. PRAYERS AND BLESSINGS.🔯🕎🌅🌈🙏

[@fLUKEYdNb]

Thank you both for wonderful information-I always come away having learned something new. YeHoVaH bless you and keep you.

[@marinalamb5852]

Wish I could afford the plus teachings ..but God ... uses your program to teach me lots. Thank you

[@eagle3351]

When I was in the church we were taught that we were no longer under the law that we were saved by grace and going to heaven. After I started going to a Messianic group I came to a lot of different conclusions. Was the Torah done away with. The answer to that is no. Yeshua even went so far as to say that to hate someone is the same as murder and that to look at a woman with lust in your heart is the same as adultery. That sounds more like fulfilling than doing away with especially when you look at the word fulfilling as filling to the fullest. And that takes away the confusion because confusions of the devil anyway. When Paul was talking about the lowering of the sheet and the clean foods and the unclean foods. He was referring to Jews and gentiles, that if the gentiles came they were to be received with love. Paul knew scripture. God had already called out what He considered food and what wasn't considered food was called unclean. God doesn't change His mind and neither did Paul. All it is is people looking to be lawless and disobedient. Yeshua told us to take up our cross and follow Him. He said we were to love the Lord our God with all our heart with all our mind and with all our strength and love our neighbor as ourself. The first four of the ten Commandments fall under the first part of those two Commandments and the last six of the ten Commandments fall into the second part about our neighbor. So that wasn't deleted. It was refined so that we could see how much more pure it was supposed to be than the way we thought it was. And it's not on demand. It is I love you God you have done so much for me I can never repay you and I will trust in you and do the best that I can to follow the laws that you've laid out for me to live by. It's a I love you I want to spend all my time with you and learn all about you so that I can live pleasing in your sight. It's not about us it's about Him. It's not about heaven it's about relationship with a loving father that wants to restore us to what we were in the garden before the fall.

[@lampsaltlight]

Very well said.

[@haruyoshida2338]

Mark 7:19 19since it enters, not into his heart, but into his stomach, and it passes out into the sewer?” Thus he declared all foods clean.

[@pamelamagdanz7132]

Shalom Aleichem, v Todah Rabbah for bringing understanding v Emet to light .

[@jamesjustice859]

Love the teaching. Where can I find the plus?

[@lillyofthevalley1611]

wow Nehemia, you are such a great an diligent scolar... may your studies bless many many seekers of truth...

[@STROND]

Talking about the cross......I am eagerly awaiting a video in which you tackle the idea that Jesus was nailed to a cross, and to take a look at the origins of the cross and why all evidence point to the fact that he was executed on a "stake " !

[@joyceobeys6818]

A tree. The guards would not go to one thief n break his legs, pass up Our Messiah, then break the legs of the other thief, then come back to MESSIAH YaHushuWaH, the guard went around the backside of a large tree. Cursed is the one who hangs on the tree. We know the obeyed all the Torah, and the Holy Days and took Nazarite vows n gave the offerings of the Nazarite vows in the NT . Acts 20 verse 7 the word week is actually plural Sabbaths. They are counting the 7 sabbaths from unleavened bread to Pentecost and Acts 21 Paul’s in Jerusalem for Pentecost taking a Nazarite vow paying for others. Paul ends up in trouble n the guards go DOWN from the Roman soldiers quarters to the Temple in the city ofDavid( The house of Bread) . Paul ( Sha’ul) also takes another Nazarite vow in Acts 18 n I think it was also Pentecost ( Shavuot) . And they never did away with circumcision but was only supposed to be through conviction by hearing Moses being preached in the synagogues is what it says. It should not be done to be a member or through coercion. They were to abstain from drinking blood n whatever sin they were doing so they could go to synagogue. And Paul explained that he would never cause anyone to stumble by eating meat offered to idols but also let them know that they are numb idols that have no power or could change the meat but it was all for conscience sake that he wouldn’t eat meat. They were all completely obedient but it had to be with deep desires a circumcised heart through the Spirit in relationship with our Messiah( angel of the Lord) Who never changed! 1 Corinthians 10 and Judges 13 n etc... Shalom Shalom (completeness, perfectness and wholeness) who’s circumcised hearts and minds are continuously on YHWH! As we are persecuted for reflecting His perfect image. 🙏🏼🕊🤍🙏🏼🤍🕊🙏🏼

[@kronos01ful]

Jesus is amazing! You deny Jesus you deny God!

[@LarryRix]

One ought to have HUGE RED FLAGS about wholesale belief of the word of a man who denies Yeshua as Messiah. Nehemia is trying to lead people into his Karaite Judaism and not to Yeshua. He is a denier. There is a price to pay for that.

[@cassandraconroy563]

@@LarryRixIn the 12 years I have listened to Nehemia speak I have not once heard him say anything that would indicate what you are claiming. Not once. I have been a disciple of Yeshua for over 4 decades. If you feel that people cannot take ownership of studying and applying the Scriptures for themselves then that is the problem. But again Nehemia isn't leading people astray. I have never heard Nehemia teach doctrine; only the pure words of the Scriptures and better than most I might add. What he has explained here in this segment is something all believers SHOULD hear loud and clear! Because many claim falsely (and due to false doctrinal teachings) that Yeshua came to free them from the responsibility to obey the instructions of The Father! those doctrines are the ones we should be wary of. The doctrinal teachings that lead people away from knowing the beautiful instructions and patterns of The King of the universe and understanding them in the original context are the doctrines we should all be made aware of and clearly be on our toes.

[@waynelippy7926]

To both of you..brought up to believe Jesus was son of Living God..came to die as Lamb of God for sinners sin. Thank you both for the joy and excitement that you genuinely enjoy in exploring the profound Highths and Depth of the LOVE YaHoVah has for us. It makes me cry at your excitement. Pray that I work out my salvation in fear and trembling and fulfill His will.

[@brit7202]

True believers of Yeshua will die to the flesh and follow the Torah out of LOVE and obedience to Yah. Because when He comes back at the 2nd coming it is to do away with the wicked law breakers. 💔

[@BenjaminTurner7]

Praise Yah!

[@Joefest99]

It seems apparent to me that Yeshua’s clarifying statement, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Torah” was necessary to clarify the distinction between his teaching to abandon the “added laws of the Rabbis” from his desire to preserve the Torah. He wanted to make sure people were recognizing that distinction. He was basically saying, “Whoa! I’m not trying to throw the baby out with the bath water here!” I’m sure it would be natural for some to have interpreted him as some sort of ultra-liberal hippy anarchist, and for others to intentionally paint him with that brush for political purposes. This seems like the least forced answer to me anyway.

[@semperfi-1918]

Exactly because if he did break Torah then he would have been in sin... inwhich salvation would be impossible.

[@frankpopolano6004]

And the same with Paul.

[@Mahalalel3]

Thank you Mr Deleoco, Your understanding is so clear and is what I understand as well. I love the way you string words together to make it plain for those seekers of God's plan. Yes, one of the angels that spoke to Ron told Ron to have the chromosome test done. The results were not expected by those techs as you have said and is why Ron knew he should be there. I often think of the beginning an old Arlo Guthrie song : Inch by inch, row by row, I'm going to make this garden grow and for sure that is how God has worked in my life little by little with all my faults and sins.

[@MrDeleoco]

The following is a repost of what I stated earlier so that others may understand the Subject: Ron Wyatt testimony and archeological finds; Which is the subject that is being referred to in your response above. Repost: This statement may not mean anything to some who have not known about the WYATT finds which started his journey to find Noahs Ark in the 1970's. If you listen to Wyatt's first-hand information, you will find the logical, credible evidence of His actions. (don't start listening to peoples that talk about Ron Wyatt, that is third hand and details are lost or embellished in emotion). Now I will not try to distort the perspective on the BLOOD sample. ...when Ron Wyatt had the BLOOD analyzed, he asked the Lab to process the sample and obvious the blood was dry. The Lab Techs agreed to follow the process even though they felt it would not reveal anything more than just blood. Ron stated to them that he wanted to be there when they processed (analyzed) the blood. On the day appointed Ron came back to the Lab and the sample was viewed. The Lab Tech in bewilderment asked "..whose blood is this.." Ron Wyatt stated to them it is the BLOOD OF YOUR MESSIAH!" In other words, the dry blood sample now with the LABORATORY procedures was not only reconstituted, but was ALIVE and the Chromosomes were available for depiction for the Lab to verify. THIS IS WHY IT IS IMPORTANT FOR ALL TO GO AND SEEK OUT THE FIRST-HAND TESTIMONY OF RON WYATT's WORDS AND THE VARIOUS SETTINGS THAT HE GAVE SUCH TESTIMONY, the nuances give tremendous meaning to that specific Lab encounter... then everything else makes sense. Finally, my perception of Ron Wyatt is not much different than that of Moses... just a man with a lot of problems not sure what is GOD's direction but Seeking Diligently and learning along the way. GOD leads those that humble themselves before a LIVING GOD. End Repost🛑

[@joyceobeys6818]

But we must stop sinning, we must stop trampling His blood.

[@richardthomas6602]

Paul said in 1 Corinthians 7:19 "Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of YAHUAH."

[@justthedudeyk]

It’s important to make a distinction here, Paul is saying circumcision is nothing in the sense it doesn’t bring salvation. The Jews back then believed that just because they were Abraham’s seed they would get salvation. So Paul is not saying don’t get circumcised.

[@richardthomas6602]

@@justthedudeyk read the verse above it as well. 1 Corinthians 7:18-19 Was any man called when he was already circumcised? He is not to become uncircumcised. Has anyone been called in uncircumcision? He is not to be circumcised. [19] Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of YAHUAH.

[@Zoto-mx4yo]

It says in NT that everything written in the TORAH was for our example

[@richardthomas6602]

@@Zoto-mx4yo it also says the law of YAHUAH is our tutor. It teaches us how to love our neighbor with righteous behavior.

[@ednadiaz4193]

​@@richardthomas6602 I've been thinking upon these verses about Circumcision and asking myself this question: How can a circumcised man become an uncircumcised man? How can a man undo the physical procedure? In another area of the Scriptures it says that Israel is circumcised yet no circumcision of the heart. Unto Yehovah circumcision of the hearth is what he's looking for and not of the flesh. In this regards Paul is correct then because physical circumcision of the body parts/organs is nothing and if they don't do it (the physical circumcision) it means nothing. Whether Jew or Gentile we need the circumcision of the Heart which is the requirement of Yehovah. Circumcision of the heart is total and complete rendering of self(mind/spirit and body)to Yehovah.

[@francellew2073]

Father Yehovah touch my husband's heart in January 2018 and he haven't stopped reading His Word since then. But he also wants to learn the Truth and he is not afraid to think outside the box and he reads other books, like the Apocrypha books. He told the point of view for Abraham's life and just by watching the trailer, I remember the story he told me. I am very thankful that Angel Studios are making biblical movies. I love the Chosen, I was a little bit disappointed by the end of the second season because I doubt it that Yeshua (His real Hebrew name, not Jesus) had to rehearsal the sermon of the mountain and that the apostles were giving away flyers but overall, the message it's important.

[@delrico8788]

Hallelujah 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@toddpardue]

As far as the chosen and other teachings and books., Remember, a little leaven, Leven's the whole lump.!!! Stick to the word.!!! Pray that the Holy Spirit Gives you Discernment😮

[@francellew2073]

I do, I don't base my relationship with Yeshua (His real Hebrew name not Jesus) with the Chosen or other programs. I read His word. But if I have to pick a show like the Chosen or the garbage from hollyweird, I will pick the Chosen.

[@elvlaky]

Thanks, thanks for sharing all those Perls 🙌🏼 I am going on this until the plus-plus 😁

[@toddpardue]

I believe the next verse put city in concrete Exactly What is meant! 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled Question: Has heaven And Earth past the way? Has all been fulfilled? Second coming...and 1000 yr raine... I believe that after this, the law will be fulfilled.

[@machlove73]

Where do you find the plus section at?

[@Nehemiaswall]

www.nehemiaswall.com/category/hebrew-gospel-pearls

[@redsox141978]

Rom 2:13 Rom 2:13 For it isn't the hearers of Torah who are righteous before El'ohiym, but the doers of Torah will be justified

[@tbishop8462]

Where can i find the Plus One episodes on these verses, @Nehemia Gordon?

[@sherineayers426]

Keith as a believer should told him that Jesus said ( Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them, there is a difference of what people believe & what Jesus said

[@urielgiovanni1854]

You guys rock!

[@ingoschneuing1073]

One more point to make: Matthew 22.36-40.... about “ the greatest commandment in the Torah“ .... “the whole law (Torah) hangs and the prophets“😊🔆

[@TheRootedWord]

30:00 Finally, your quote of Keith has gotten to the crux of the issue. Paul was not opposed to the commandments of God. While I have yet to complete the translation of Galatians and Romans I have done enough work in them to date that I see that the English translations are stacked to force a certain theology which is not born out by the Greek.

[@evolgenius1150]

He began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” He was reading Isaiah. He was definitely speaking of the Torah, the Writings and the Prophets.

[@HHS2050]

Does Anyone know the plus video? Thanks you.

[@dapayneishere]

From what I understand, is this. The Torah is "Broken" down into 3 parts. Sacrificial, Ceremonial, and Moral. The Ceremonial is the 7 Feasts of YeHoVaH, and the Moral, which I believe is the 10 Commandments. Yeshua fulfilled the Sacrificial, and we are responsible for the Ceremonial, and the Moral. That is how I understand Matt. 5:17

[@Markver1]

This textual critisism smoking gun thing is fascinating. Now in the next episode I expect you both will explain Hebrew Matthew 5:18 where “or the Prophets” appears to have simply migrated to from verse 17. Seems like a game of trading places going on between the Hebrew version and the Greek/English versions. Thank you Dr. Nehemia and Keith for the deep study.

[@joseovallej2587]

Mister Nehemiah thank you for you teaching about the Bible, I just I few days ago I was watching other good resources about it topics, and I believe it verse ( Matthew 5:17) matches perfectly with the transfiguration of Yeshua in Matthew 17;1-9 because it is the representation of the law ( Torah/Moses) and the prophets ( Neviim/Elijah) .

[@andrewstaples7544]

and the Ketuvim / Psalms , Writtings and history books

[@vm1552]

@Nehemiah, what is Hebrew word for "cross". Does any Hebrew version renders the Greek "Stauros" as being a pole with a crossbeam?

[@thambone30]

Eager to invent supposed contradictions, some have claimed that James’ letter encouraging faith by works nullifies Paul’s writings regarding salvation by faith and not by works. However, the context reveals that James refers to faith supported by works, not just words, whereas Paul clearly means works of the Law. Actually, James supplements the arguments of Paul, going one step further by defining how faith is made manifest. James’ counsel is most practical in its coverage of the day-to-day problems of the Christian. Some had fallen into the snare of looking to those more prominent and rich and showing favoritism. (Jas 2:1-9) They failed to discern what they really were in God’s eyes and were hearers of the word but not doers. (1:22-27) They had begun to use their tongues wrongly, and their cravings for sensual pleasure were causing fights among them. (3:2-12; 4:1-3) Their desire for material things had brought some into the position of being friends of the world and therefore, not chaste virgins, but spiritual “adulteresses,” at enmity with God.​-4:4-6. James corrected them on the matter of being doers as well as hearers by showing from Scriptural examples that a man having real faith would manifest it by works in harmony with his faith. For example, one having true faith would not say to a brother naked and lacking food, “Go in peace, keep warm and well fed,” and not give him the necessities. (Jas 2:14-26) Here James was not contradicting Paul by saying that one could earn salvation by works. Rather, he accepts faith as the basis for salvation but points out that there cannot be genuine faith that does not produce good works. This is in harmony with Paul’s description of the fruitage of the spirit, at Galatians 5:22-24, and his counsel to put on the new personality, at Ephesians 4:22-24 and Colossians 3:5-10, as well as his admonition to do good and share with others, at Hebrews 13:16.

[@Victrola777]

So, what then is the new covenent? And where can I find it in the bible?

[@chancetaylor2954]

Sadly alot of the brothers and sisters here are missing the message Paul sent to the Galatians... If everything you are doing is out of love for god you will be gifted the spirit and you will be granted all the laws in your heart. You will innately follow all laws he has given you as they are placed on your heart. Sin will push you away from the spirit and NEVER reject the spirit

[@the_coreyjohnson]

The New Covenant is at the resurrection. We have a deposit of the Holy Spirit leading us to circumcise our hearts to repent from law breaking. But when Jesus resurrects us, he will give us a new body and a new heart, and the Law will be written on our hearts and we will no longer be able to break any commandment. The New Covenant is about getting a new heart. It is not a new law. Christendom has abused and misused the writings of Paul to lead people astray to Lawlessness. Peter warns about this very thing in his Epistle. It is only possible to confuse Paul’s writings if you don’t understand the Law. Read and learn the Law (Gen - Deut). Then see the example of Israel’s obedience and disobedience in the Writings. After that, read the Prophets to see God calling his people back to the Law. Read the Gospels and see Jesus keep and teach the Law. Read Acts that shows the Apostles keeping and teaching the Law. Paul was even accused of of teaching against the Law (which most modern Christians use his writings to teach) which he denied and even went to the temple to do a sacrifice to prove he taught that Christians should be obedient to the Law. Then read the non-Pauline Epistles, and you will see the Apostles teaching obedience to the Law. And then after all that, read Paul carefully and notice how he says we must uphold the Law. That we must not live in the flesh, because those that live in the flesh are hostile to God because they do not submit to the Law. So living in the Spirit means you are obedient to the Law. And living in the flesh means you are disobedient to the Law. Then, before reading Hebrews, study Leviticus and. Numbers a lot in order to understand the book of Hebrews. The author of Hebrews even says in the book that if you don’t have a strong understanding of the Law, you won’t be able to understand the book of Hebrews.

[@josiasdekockfourie6017]

Hi Nehemiah and Keith, Can you please help my with the Tetragrammaton, I need to know, with the English way of saying it, would be Yod Hey Vav Hey. Or is it with the W replacing the V of the Vav? Or can it be both?

[@willgeorge5644]

you guys are so good! You remain friends, obviously have a "love of the truth" and no guile! You should invite questions on this and answer like you do. I have an astounding theory I would like to run by you!

[@joannthomases9304]

The new is more fuuuuulllll fiiiiiiling..more abundant....take the dead and bring it to life. The living speak and breath and God spoke..and written is spoken from breath. Walking in the spirit..a living word.

[@canyonroller8834]

Nehemia this is a wonderful episode and since, through your teaching, I learned about the George Howard Hebrew Gospel of Matthew, I have studied it with much excitemtent. However I have come across a statement that I find troubling as I was hoping that we have a piece of the original first century Hebrew heritage of the gospel account in Howard's book. Referring to the Jerusalem Perspective website, David N. Bivin's article 'Has a Hebrew Gospel Been Found?' asks a difficult question. After making the statement: 'It appears to me that the text of Matthew found in Even Bohan is the translation of a fluent Hebrew writer of the medieval period, rather than a revision of an early Hebrew composition, as Howard claims', he goes on to write: 'Matthew 5:18 offers an excellent test case because it contains both highly Hebraic features and signs of Greek editing'.... in particular - (not one letter or dot) which he judges to be: 'probably a reference to a yod and its qotz'. If in fact this reference is to nikud, the text would be reflecting a sixth to tenth century practice, rather than that of the first century. Nehemia, please can you advise what your thinking would be on this critique?

[@davidheilbronprice145]

Great detective work on manuscripts. You nailed it Nehemia. You cleared the smoke. Neither Greek nor Hebrew has what is commonly spoken 'the law AND the prophets'. The Hebrew of 5:17 in Howard omits 'or the prophets'. It has in v 18 'not one letter or dot shall be abolished from the Torah OR the prophets' which KJV does not have. In v15 KJV has 'Think not that I am come to destroy the law OR the prophets..' not AND. This is correct by the Greek. This gives a different meaning/ nuance than saying 'laws AND the prophets' as was said in this episode. The implication is that some group may have said (like the Samaritans) that only the Torah was valid/ kosher and the prophets were to be avoided.

[@fattoria_di_bastoni]

ThankQ❣️

[@scottsutherland3088]

By the way thanks for this it’s a nice refresher.

[@adanechassefa8156]

Amen Amen Amen !!!!!!!

[@jollyrodgers7272]

I can't thank you enough for these eye-opening teachings. It seems the majority of Christendom has painted themselves into a theological corner, and follow 'another Jesus', which John and Paul warn us about. In Colossians chapter 2, Paul states DOGMA (in the Greek) was nailed to the cross, and argues against returning to those DOGMATISMOS (manmade regulations) that shackled the believers - but Christians don't know the difference between the Oral Torah of the Pharisees and the Written Torah of Moses. When the Messiah repeatedly says, "Go, and Sin NO MORE!", what is the definition of Sin if the Written Torah of Moses has been done away with? Hint: the Torah of Moses has NOT been done away with - and the Pauline Epistles reflect that, if you approach it realizing Paul is deriding the manmade regulations, as the Greek makes no distinction - both Oral and Written Torah usually translate only as 'Law'.

[@joyceobeys6818]

Amen! Sin is Transgression of the Law!

[@joyceobeys6818]

And Paul took at least two Torah keeping Nazarite Vows and gave the offerings which are sacrifice of a Numbers 6. In Acts 21 and also in Acts 18 but as Christians we overlook it cuz who knows that shaving 🪒 was the Nazarite Vow? And offerings are a Sacrifice?

[@thetopcat8946]

​@@joyceobeys6818It mean "miss the mark" as in when an arrow misses the target

[@rctk2000]

Unfortunately, the Roman church kept the words of the Bible all to themselves for so many years while they changed many of those words for their purposes. Just like the Pharisees did before, one of the worst offenders was changing the name of the Almighty to "The Lord." This allowed them to have a leader with the title of Holy Father who could have the ultimate saying in the church, even above their god. We live in the times when knowledge is expanding and what was hidden will be made known. Keep digging for the truth brothers and show the truth Rock of ישוע

[@TheLloydChannel]

Hey! Two things... 1)is it possible to carbon date the manuscripts to see "which" came first? Or would the range be too wide? 2) In the John 6:4 study John L. mentioned that the early commentators so completely commented on each verse of the NT, that it could practically be reconstructed by only the commentators' writings. Is this verse talked about? Do they mention "and the prophets"? Thanks! Love you guys and what you're doing!

[@hptc4400]

Hi Nehemia, This is excellent work as usual. I thibkbi missed your explanation for the conclusion that Manuscript K is a copy of Q.

[@willgeorge5644]

So what does "Fulfill" mean in that context, also not the English word, but the meaning and etymology of the Hebrew word?

[@TheJavsolo]

Which translation of the Bible is true to the original manuscripts

[@messianiccongregationpakis2869]

Amen , excellent job

[@giborchayil]

Do not think, means to me, do not even let it enter your mind!!!

[@algreen562]

Hi guys, can you please write in the description which of your websites we will be able to find the Plus video to go with these public videos. Put in wording like, "To see the Plus video that goes along with this video, go to Nehemiah's site." That would be helpful.

[@Humdinger1951]

A plus session ?

[@usmcPath]

@ 25:29 Or……that there were people who were confused by how Paul was teaching (he was a very smart man) and thought, like a lot do today, that he was teaching against the Law. Far be it for there to be a confusing issue alive then that still exists today.

[@linosuficiencia8806]

Who can understand the thoughts of God but by the spirit of God. The secret things of God were not given and entrusted to unbelieving men but only to those whom God called

[@wilmaeulberg4323]

Paul is largely misunderstood. He also said by his life example that he established the law.

[@truthseeker9070]

Paul is not for beginners

[@MichaelDFortner]

The reason "the prophets" could have been added to that Hebrew ms was not merely to make it match the Greek, but because those MS from which the Greek were made, had it in. If some other Hebrew MS do not have it, then perhaps they are copies of one that accidently left it out.

[@manuelgandia2863]

Brother Nehemiah I use too believe that the Torah was away with it but I realize through the New Testament that even Paul agree with the Torah if I’m not mistaking in the book of Roman Paul say not to get away with the Torah I being bless with your teaching and let Yehovah bless you always,,,Shalom

[@homescholed]

33:00. I can imagine them going to temple, but I don’t see Yeshua wearing tefillin or teaching his disciples to do likewise.

[@RepairtheBreach5812]

Shalom! I Love the information and sources shared without the indoctrination interpretation. Awesome 👍

[@linak7155]

I grew up with the erroneous belief that Jesus came to bring a new way. Decades later I learned different. YeHoVaH is merciful!

[@angelluisll1033]

One of the things I learned many years ago is that what means one thing in one language if used in another language can not be expected to mean the same thing. "Matthew 5:17-20 KJV Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." A "jot or tittle" are the symbols or markings found anywhere around a word to help in its use and understanding. To add or take away anything will change its meaning.

[@ONSTAGEMUSICPODCAST]

May I ask something totally off the topic? In Acts 2, there’s the ‘cloven of tongues” and the “spoke with tongues”… then the healing and prophesying. Are those for today? What does Paul mean “…where tongues have ceased…”. and cessationism.

[@SDsc0rch]

the title says "nailed to the cross" WHAT did this say about nailing to the cross?? I'm confused...

[@duckrivermama66]

Maybe they mean it to reflect the teaching that the Law was "nailed to the cross" and therefore destroyed. I had the same question, and this thought came to mind.

[@SDsc0rch]

@@duckrivermama66 --- yeah well, they never actually say that

[@duckrivermama66]

@@SDsc0rch I know. It's really disappointing to listen to something and find that the don't directly address the advertised topic.

[@rapturebound197]

17 "For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, “The just shall live by faith.” ~ Rom 1:17 11 "But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the just shall live by faith.” ~ Gal. 3: 11

[@BarqB]

I miss you guys. Please bring back more gospel Pearls. Yeshua Didn't come to abolish He came to full and most importantly He came as a replacement of the temple sacrifice. He is the new High Priest. He is the New King. Most importantly He is the Sacrifice we all have faith in that it was given in place of the temple sacrifice and a propitiation for our sins. Everything else stays intact. Thus his prophecy of the destruction of the temple to come.

[@TheLloydChannel]

My thoughts on "and the Prophets"... As Matthew wrote his gospel in Hebrew, and it was very soon after the events, I suspect he and other followers of Yeshua as the Messiah had not fully yet ~understood~ how Yeshua had fulfilled "the Prophets". My understanding is that Jews at that time did not have "pocket copies" of the Tanach in their possession, and only heard the Hebrew Scriptures read in the synagogues once over a 7 year period of time. So it would have taken TIME to realize the fulfillment of the Prophets in His life, death, resurrection, and giving of the Holy Spirit, during His "acceptable year of the LORD" ministry. Thank you for ALL you do!

[@EJ_7715]

If you have been washed in the regeneration of Jesus blood, then you have no need of ordinances because you are no longer fallen! You are born again!

[@cjauto60]

Amen!!

[@surfshop7552]

Yup 100%

[@delrico8788]

Hallelujah 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@dw3403]

We are put back into the faith of Abraham who was called righteous because he believed Gods was able to do that which he promised. Righteousness did not come by the commandments, nor the priesthood nor the temple because they were not here when Abraham believed. And it was all based on his promise which he fulfilled.

[@bridgetteowen5242]

You need to study the term, “ordinances” and continue to study the scripture-“rightly divided “

[@scottsutherland3088]

Thanks, I seen a video rabbi a few years ago that you hadn’t accepted yeshua as your saviour I believe it was the same subject. Have you changed your thought.

[@melpogi9]

Listening for 20mins with the "i did this, i did that, i know this and that..and the smoking gun"....SO WHAT'S THE SIGNIFICANCE of this finding to believers ?

[@syncitycom7772]

Like 4:12. Jesus reads from the scroll of the prophet Isaiah. (Vs17) after reading that set of verses (Isa. 61:2,1) Jesus declared the above scripture. “Today this scripture that you just heard is fulfilled.” Did Jesus only fulfill the Law? or did he fulfill the law w and the Prophets?

[@PamelaM741]

I keep listening to this over the years and I still get confused. Is Nehemiah confirming, through the manuscript and his study, that the 4 words ARE original, or is he saying they were added in by the Greeks?

[@P-P-L]

After watching this episode suddenly I understand why the church I met all focus on new testment and Paul's letter and neglect the education of Torah. It is believed that Torah harder to be understood than Paul's deduction just because lack of knowledge of history. One problem the present church can not answer me is that:if Torah refreshed,which verse was cancelled and which verse is still valid? Listen to whom? What is standard of this refreshing? They may answer it is Jesus' love. Then is there no love from Jehova in Torah? So if can't explicitly explain this refreshing, then only left "just believe in Jesus then can go to heaven" this simple education. If think this way,every phenomenon I met can be explained. Old testment becomes tasteless?

[@P-P-L]

Thanks God for letting me understand your study

[@jacekjacenty]

Why do people say that Paul was saying Torah is no longer valid? In Galatians 5:3 I testify again to every man who accepts circumcision that he is obligated to keep the whole law. (English Standard Version). Does that mean Torah is still valid? Does that mean that Gentile Christians were not under the obligation to the rules of the Sinai Covenant, but the instruction part of the Torah still applies? Does the book of Deuteronomy teach you how to think?

[@ingoschneuing1073]

Did you realize, that in Hebrew Matthew 5:18 it says:“ ...from the Torah or the Prophets“ while this is not in KJV neither in Luther!😊

[@jonk.j.jeffbartz7948]

Was very gratified that you brought in the "Epistle of Barnabas", and Justin in regards to the "Abolished Torah" question, and you made my day by showing that Matt corrosive 5:17 is verified/quoted in the Babylonian Talmud. Further, the research I've been doing clearly shows that the Gentile converts around 50 CE were generally not versed in the Torah as shown at the Jerusalem Council, and if it hadn't been for the Jewish and Roman persecutions and interference (especially banning all Jews from Rome, and later, Jerusalem), they would have had the chance to learn Torah, and the pagan Sun Cults would not have had anywhere near the corrosive theological influence on the various assemblies.

[@willgeorge5644]

at 23:00, Jesus often does this, he starts from a different base, making us have to re evaluate out presuppositions. It is God in him that make the law, he can do anything with it. You still have not handled the word "fulfill", it is vitally important. If I wanted to say that the law was unchanged I may say "confirm" or something similar. but fulfil is different. If you stop at a traffic light you could say you "obeyed" the law, but to "fulfil" the law?. He is saying something else about the law, in fact, he is saying many things about it? Like, a Law CAN be "fulfilled", completed. Which means it was not "complete" in the first place and it was waiting for him to complete it. Jeremiah says ", the Lord declared, “This shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; . . . I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jeremiah 31:33). That IS "completing" the law! That is what he was getting at! The law is still there, but if His law is "written in our inward parts". the outward law has no effect. See what He says in other places, "“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. 38This is the great and first commandment. 39And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. 40On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.”"

[@bmjjjja]

Why do you think Q precedes the other manuscripts that contain those words in the actual text? If that is true, then where did Q get those words that were left out? Doesn't it make more sense that the other manuscripts preceded Q and the scribe of Q accidentally left out the phrase? If he is copying from the others and accidentally left out the phrase "and the prophets" then putting it above the line to add it back in, also solves where he got it.

[@303ondock]

Hey! Nehemia Gordon, you must research the term cross because from my understanding the time Rome implement the cross as an instrument to torture people on was about 300 years after Christ death. I really would love to hear you on this one as well..

[@haruyoshida2338]

Stauros is the Greek word that describes the object where Jesus was nailed.

[@conversative]

"In order that the righteous requirement of the *law might be fulfilled* in us, who *walk…according to the Spirit.* " Romans 8:4

[@Mahalalel3]

Loved that first scripture Matthew 5 that Keith quoted. Yup, and how many are there that let this very important scripture go over their heads because they are " under grace. ". No way, We are to understand that not one jot or tittle will pass from the Law. The Law was put in the Most Holy Place in the Arc of the Covenant where the Blood of Messiah anointed the Mercy Seat to provide atonement for sin if one believes what Ron Wyatt said and I do ! He was no liar. The devil is going to hang on his own gallows.

[@-kepha8828]

Ron Wyatt was no liar? Ron testified that he saw the 2 tablets of stone. He then testified that they only had the 10 commandments written on them. Yet Exodus 24:12 specificly states that the 2 tablets of stone had "ALL OF TJE LAW and commandments written on the 2 stones, on FRONT AND BACK". Ron didnt account for this. When I asked his wife about this descepencey, it put her on the spot, they were unaware of Exodus 24:12, and could not answer the question. You see, Ron wyatt didnt believe in keeping the law of God. He taught that it was done away with. If he would have testified that ALL OF THE LAW was written on the 2 stone tablets, he would have been publicly acknowledging that he was a liar who did not keep them or want them for guidance. There is a REASON Ton Wyatt and corrupt Christian's refuse to achknowledge that ALL OF THE LAW was written on those 2 tablets. They are deceivers.

[@David-fg5xv]

God said"Let there be light" and there was light. Jesus said "You shall love the Lord thy God ..." Is that prophetically fulfilled ? The law fulfilled in our hearts.

[@lonestarstate6570]

Interesting…however it’s possible the Jewish scribes of these copies of Matthew removed the phrase “and the prophets” from the text to lessen the idea that Jesus is the Messiah. What if “K” is older than “Q”??? That would mean the scribe of Q removed the 4 words when copying from K. Either way, none of the Hebrew manuscripts mentioned are even close to the oldest Greek copies we have of Matthew, which all include the Greek phrase “and the prophets”, with no textual variation between them. The oldest extent version of Matthew that we have is in Syriac…. It also includes the phrase, and agrees with the Greek.

[@ElizabetaDante]

What with the title??

[@joyceobeys6818]

Complete, Fulfill= Accomplish!

[@joannthomases9304]

he fullfilled the sacrifices, is what i was taught.

[@joyceobeys6818]

Paul was doing sacrifices when he took Nazarite vows of Numbers 6 in Acts 21 on the day of Pentecost and in Acts 18.

[@joyceobeys6818]

And sacrifices will be taking place in the 1000 year reign in Zechariah 14:16-21 Constantine ended them in the 300’s.

[@LPerezDancer]

I respect and enjoy your videos, but you two are missing the big picture. When one thinks about things in the context of traditional religious thought, there are endless variations and disagreements. However, no one, not Paul, not the Messiah, not James in Scripture had any ideas of "abolishing" the Torah. The Mosaic law code is the original covenant which was to stand until Messiah. Messiah established the new covenant. Messiah was only qualified to do this because Yehovah sent him to do that. Throughout the Law and the Prophets (the "OT") the Messiah is proclaimed to come and establish a new covenant whereby "all nations" would be blessed. This does not invalidate or abolish the Mosaic law code, it merely opens the way for all nations to come to know Yehovah. The Mosaic law code could only be fulfilled by the Messiah. The Mosaic law code was put in place to expose human kind's need for the Messiah. Though Gentiles are not under strict command to observe the Mosaic law code, that does not invalidate it. Paul himself wrote regarding the OT, "all the things that were written beforehand were written for our instruction, so that through our endurance and through the comfort from the Scriptures we might have hope". So, we look to the Torah and the prophets for instruction, not for rules which the Pharisees and others like them could exploit.

[@stevenvanvuuren8394]

Ask Nehemia if paul wrote before matthew AND DID MATTHEW KNOW PAUL FOUND CHRIST IN.THE DESERT WHEN HE WAS BUSY WRITTING MATT 24:23-26 ?????????