NASA Reveals NEW Moon Lander!

NASA Reveals New Moon Lander Vehicle!
Get Early Access and Discount Codes to The Tesla Space & Space Race merch store by signing up here: shop.theteslaspace.com
Last Video: What The Journey To The Moon Will Be Like!
• What The Journey To Th...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: [e-mail]
#Spacex #Space #Mars

[@TheSpaceRaceYT]

Get Early Access and Discount Codes to The Tesla Space & Space Race merch store by signing up here: shop.theteslaspace.com

[@seanbabyboy100]

First

[@dereksteneman9657]

3D LIDAR mapping of the earth is impressive! Feed that data to AI/ML combined with specific sensors… could be a game changer

[@troys9222]

I'm going to start saying that about everything. "Feed that data to AI. It could be a game changer!" "I had my dog neutered last week" "Feed that data to AI. It could be a game changer!"

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro

[@sammyringstrom1448]

Space x has the contract for the moon lander but blue origin got a extra conract to work as backup

[@middletnpyro]

spacex won the contract for artemis 3 and 4, Blue origin won the contract for artemis 5

[@troys9222]

@@middletnpyro Don't think for a minute this isn't also a backup plan in case SpaceX drops the ball for Artemis 3.

[@futurespace2380]

Blue Origin would like it 😂

[@middletnpyro]

@Troy S lmao you really think blue and Boeing will be ready by 2025/2026 🤣

[@ryansmith9806]

SpaceX got the Artemis 3 and 4 contract. Based on this missions nasa will decide if they want to continue with SpaceX for Artemis 5. Blue Origin won a contract for Artemis 5.

[@lovro4744]

Was very surprised the pad didn't already had this kind of pillars buried underneath. If you think about the vibrations and the weight pressing down, it is similar to a building during an earthquake. So i kind of makes sense you need a good solid fundation.

[@o-wolf]

Yeh.. I've been noticing for quite a while now that a combination of Elon not really knowing what he's doing &the breakneck pace he pushes the engineers who do is causing alot of unnecessary problems that he craftily writes off as "rocket go boom actually good!!" He's trained his cult to respond positively to his rockets blowing up so even when it's a sign of incompetence &lack of foresight no one bats an eyelid at a gaff that wastes billions of dollars of taxpayer moolah

[@troys9222]

It only had 6 of those type when installed, for the legs. Then, there were 24 much smaller piles in the center with only a single rebar in the middle of each. They look to be 12" (30cm) maybe, in diameter. I'm not a concrete guy, but I've seen a lot of piles poured on sites, and I have never seen a single strand of rebar in one ever. If you look at the first aftermath photos you can see the tops of several of the small piles in the crater. CSI Starbase channel and others have photos and renderings of the original pad construction.

[@futurespace2380]

But one Problem was many, that these 24 smaller piles weren't well distributed, because there were some corners left inside the hexagonal, that only rely upon the sand below the concrete... but CSI Starbase have very good Video about it on his channel...

[@RideAcrossTheRiver]

Yeah, it's not like NASA never did that.

[@troys9222]

@@futurespace2380 I don't think they evert tied the outer ring into the center hex either.

[@mynewdodgetruck1]

Love the channel.

[@NicholasNerios]

Besides all the rockets blowing up, it's good to see progress.

[@thirdboylol95]

Is it just me or does the dynamics landing system kinda looks like Jamestown Lunar base from For all mankind?

[@hesliterallymebro]

That's basically what they're going for, a habitat that you can land on the lunar surface. A shame they weren't picked.

[@jairhausheer3712]

@6:40 Wow it makes sense, but look at how flexible the tank is when the technician/engineer pushes on it!

[@donperegrine922]

I hope that is just a fluffy insulation blanket

[@FACTCHECKEDbyGoogle]

😂 Good find. ''Space may be the final frontier but it is made in a Hollywood basement''

[@theprettypetard2524]

just saying but if those lidar satelite work it could be great for the moon and mars. we could potentially have a map of the whole place before ever going there.

[@ashfordmarketofficial9610]

spaceship moon lander - It seems also When landing or taking off on the moon they will need the spaceship thrusters high up on the spaceship this will overcome any damage to the spaceship thrusters when landing or taking off from the moon

[@magnetospin]

So this woman awarded SpaceX huge contracts while working at NASA and now works for SpaceX. Quite a revolving door, isn't it?

[@o-wolf]

VERY suspect if u ask me, hell spacex being chosen initially as the lander project was sus too.. the design makes zero sense &has multiple areas of possible failure before it even gets to lunar insertion let alone how landing something THAT big on the moon would work without serious consequences

[@edwardwinkowski9263]

Look at Boeing and the FAA

[@troys9222]

I read that as revolting door, perfect.

[@middletnpyro]

​@O-Wolf spacex was the cheapest bid, nothing sus about that, simple government bid awarding 🤷‍♂️

[@troys9222]

@@middletnpyro Very suspect bid level I'd say. SpaceX bid to get the contract, and will worry about what it really costs later. Of course they didn't allot enough for a launch pad already, so I wonder what else they underestimated. EIS maybe?

[@InnerProp]

Can New Glenn take Blue Moon without a refuel? Did they move the crew cabin to bottom to remove the need for the crazy long ladder?

[@ericwilliams538]

At this point, I wish all and every space program/agencies, private and government funded, nothing but success!!! I sincerely mean this... I also wish they would move their asses a little faster with getting things completed.... because I would like to witness a Moon base, and Mars colony..

[@KimmyJongUn]

Did you not before?

[@ericwilliams538]

@@KimmyJongUn everyone except North Korea....

[@samwilson2797]

NASA moves slowly and has been working on these programs for decades. There is a lot going on behind the scenes. There is no room for errors and they are meticulous in their work.

[@ericwilliams538]

@@samwilson2797 all you mentioned is basically a given. I would say the major factor is funding. They were on the verge of potentially having a moon base back in the late 60's early 70's. Due to the people of the U.S. having a change of heart in following the space program at that time, the government couldn't justify spending the money on such expenses missions. Hence the rise of the shuttle program.

[@phazix6529]

My personal guess is august for next launch, i bet elon will give it 2 months into the window then heill decide to push it because he feels 2 months in is a lot

[@markwebcraft]

I think it's hilarious that your saying Blue Origin is a veteran space company. I just don't believe anyone deserves that title without at the very least, reaching orbit. No matter how long they've been doing this. Working with some veteran's for sure, but Blue Origin isn't a part of that group.

[@ernestnoto3820]

I agree. Maybe they think this is an Amazon delivery

[@chopdoc11]

Elon or one of the commercial explorers should put a space station in orbit of the moon and charge docking/usage fees. Have maneuvering thrusters so it could be positioned as needed. Inflatable buildings for the surface and with low gravity it wouldnt be unthinkable to have travel from the surface to the space station by rocket packs. It might sound like 1950's popular mechanics but we actually have the technology available now to make it happen. Just need someone with the vision and cash to make it happen.

[@_MaxHeadroom_]

Cool to see that with Raptor V3s Starship will have just short of 20 million pounds of thrust

[@troys9222]

That's if they all start. Can't assume that ever

[@_MaxHeadroom_]

@@troys9222 Yeah but how do we know that the reliability won't be improved? It must be possible if they had all but 3 start on their very first test out of 33. Over 90 percent success rate already as it stands

[@troys9222]

​@@_MaxHeadroom_ That last word was supposed to be 'even', and kind of a joke, but ever is funnier. A 90% success starting up (on vehicles) is terrible after 9 years of development. They've only had all the Raptors on a vehicle work perfectly once, and that was 3 engines.

[@_MaxHeadroom_]

@@troys9222 We'll see but I don't think it's fair to assume anything yet based on one test with what will soon be outdated engines. It can only lose 3 engines and still make it to orbit so getting every engine started is a must

[@troys9222]

@@_MaxHeadroom_ I'm not assuming, that's the thing. I'm waiting to see. I can't say I'm confident, but you can't assume it will all work out either. It's going to hurt the space program pretty badly if it doesn't. Losing about 2 engines per minute at this stage is concerning. Elon says on one hand they are currently optimizing the Raptor for reliability, then talks about pushing the engine even harder, without even having a reliable baseline yet.

[@samwilson2797]

Looks like the lander from the Apolo program. Those people got it right the first time.

[@HaHa-tb8bz]

Wow 😯

[@Riteaidbob]

And the whole thing never gets off the ground because someone let a FREAKING permit to use a frequency expire. You just watch.

[@user-nc7tv8yi7y]

I am worried about this LiDAR lasers may have on Airplane pilots, if a bean is shot down into a area where planes maybe taking off, or landing.

[@jameswilson4732]

50 years later and the shit looks the same. They should be able to launch a moon mission in 2 weeks

[@1ciroloid]

Ask George Santos if he wants to go to the moon as a prerequisite for his current gig.

[@jamespalazzi7990]

If I were you I would start trying to buy out every landowner around your star base. They would come in handy for your employees to move into every house that you possibly can. But what do I know.

[@billspoonts]

Looks like Apollo lander. Save the money and use the old one.

[@earth2006]

The FCC isn't the go folks. The FAA has the up bottom. No up, botton, no up.

[@amyhart903]

They really are at break neck speeds

[@yoskarokuto3553]

why not use 60s' lunar lander technology it work fine with 100% no defect

[@ScottLaVoie-yz3yy]

Don't get to happy it's not like they will ever use it, they meaning NASA

[@bearlemley]

Why in Zeus’s armpit did you say Starship “exploded’ over and over? Starship was detonated. That craft proved to be so tuff it may never even buckled if they had not blow a couple of holes in it.

[@troys9222]

It did break up into a fireball, which we call an explosion. From Oxford Dictionary: Explosion: a violent and destructive shattering or blowing apart of something Detonation: the action of causing a bomb or explosive device to explode. So they detonated the FTS charges, it failed, then Starship *exploded* over 50 seconds later due to uncertain causes, most likely aerodynamic forces.

[@_mikolaj_]

If we are to go to such details No it wasnt detonated either it broke up. Tho tbf, B7 did have few explosions on the way up ;)

[@MrNote-lz7lh]

​@@troys9222 It exploded because they set off bombs inside of it. Do you even have a brain?

[@uryahcosgrove8625]

if you haven't yet NASA should put a satellite around the moon duh before some DBB does it first

[@enlaescnoaprendinada]

que buen lavado de guita que hacen estos millonarios, los admiro, mas quenada el blue-meabymoon

[@lymancopps5957]

Sue NASA enough times, you get the contract.

[@ryansmith9806]

Nasa isn’t afraid of law suits, they are literally the government

[@hectorkeezy1633]

Space-X will move from Boca Chica in the end.

[@sarcasmo57]

I want to go to the Moon.

[@samwilson2797]

OK Alice.

[@fenilkheni9494]

we should use lidar to map north korea and and make it a cs:go map. data collected from that, welll you know.....

[@hothmandon]

Attack of the Humans From outer space!

[@jameswilson4732]

50 years later and this is what the fuck they came up with? We should have been living on Mars by 2001

[@_mikolaj_]

Who would pay for it? Look we could have gone to mars long ago, but thats not NASA's fault. Ironically, its, well, ours Beacuse it is us(technically not me cuz im not US citizen) who pay taxes. Can you expext NASA to do such things quickly if you dont pay them?

[@jameswilson4732]

@@_mikolaj_ Matt Damon went and ate Potatos

[@chrischris8550]

What if both Blue Origin and Starship fail because of lack of dialogue and rivalry? Will Bernard Cribbins and the citizens of Grand Fenwick come to the rescue? Don't forget to feed the Bobolinks!

[@TheAmericanCatholic]

Unlikely

[@genius1a]

I think the question is a good one, and I even think it is a likely outcome. But nevertheless the NASA decision for those two companies is not too bad in the big picture: A Main Part of the Space X HLS is the HLS Starship Rocket, that shall fly up to LEO to be refilled by multiple other Starship rockets. So that whole process is part of what NASA is officially funding by this HLS contract. Even if they fail to develop a human rated moon lander in a resonable time frame, but at least get to Lunar Orbit with payloads, they could act as a rather cheap way to deploy a huge, very capable Lunar Spacegate that could be use as a dock for a third party moon lander like the Alpacca from Dynetics. And if they fail completely, Starship never gets to fly, and Space X goes down for whatever reason, its ompetitor Blue Origin - you guessed it - has New Glenn functioning as the counterpart of Starship, as it is also is a crucial part of testing and deploying their own Blue Moon Lander. So this gives a second chance for a capable Space Transport System, and could be used to host and deploy a third party Moon Lander as well. Maybe after years of fruitless waiting, Nasa steps in and develops a Moon Lander in house with parts from various contractors. Or they buy the Chinese version that's up and flying by then ...

[@CarFreeSegnitz]

I got that reference. The Mouse That Roared, The Mouse on Wall Street, The Mouse on the Moon book series by Leonard Wibberly. The screen adaptation The Mouse That Roared, 1959, with Peter Sellers.

[@chrischris8550]

@@CarFreeSegnitz The film is oh so relevant in today's society and might well even prove to be correct on our second attempt for a Moon landing. Let's hope they put their Ego's aside and work together.

[@chrischris8550]

@@genius1a Well that was a good read!

[@richardsmith8590]

all data on Artemis launch of the first test has disappeared.

[@uryahcosgrove8625]

29 seconds in looks like a giant chunk of coal or its obsidian

[@leapdrive]

Why do we need two landers to the moon? SpaceX already won the low bid. Why is there a duplication of effort?

[@KA4UPW]

WoW 70 years later.. and the lander looks the same.. how disappointing. And that space plane thing looks like it came off the introduction of the six million dollar man

[@CarFreeSegnitz]

The accident featured in the title sequence of Six Million Dollar Man is real, the actual crash of the M2-F2 lifting body experimental aircraft, May 10, 1967. The real life pilot, Bruce Peterson, did survive but lost use of his right eye.

[@alecbrown66]

I nearly broke a rib laughing at this. Now they are trying to con NASA with covered copy of their "flying bedstead" that nearly lilled Neil Armstrong, with a standard orb shaped submersible inside! Sheesh! Where as spacex is just waiting for the launch stand concrete piles to dry properly, and get the deluge system completed.

[@Deckers2006]

You will never be able to push enough water under the pad. 329 thousand tons of pressure ? So what kind of supercompressor has been invented to push the much water pressure UPWARD through those holes? Look you will have to put flame trenches in that shoot the flame pressure off in two to maybe five individual directions rather than one maybe. But you cannot get around the flame trench requirement in simple physics, regardless of perforated iron plates construction. This will not work either. So try it and find out anyway. And then you'll be right back to debris blowing all over the launch area again. The rockets will torch through and blast it all to pieces.

[@thexfile.]

Blue Oink.

[@kastenolsen9577]

More like "they had the money and whining power" to buy the contract.

[@dannypope1860]

Blue Origin hasn’t even made it to orbit… wtf

[@opo10]

Opo

[@titolino73]

What ?2029 to get back to the moon? Common it seems something wrong here ...they've postponed years now....🤔

[@michaelhband]

👍👍👍❤❤❤🚀🚀🚀

[@kastenolsen9577]

Notice the Alpaca lander is the best design. Maybe they should have whined about it!

[@sonofamortician]

BO and Boeing, that 'backup' will be late and overpriced, probably not be to anywhere near ready when that mission is supposed to take place, instead of adding safety this adds a fault line to the Artemis project, and at huge cost. this is not going to end well.

[@Jam-In-With-Ben]

hi

[@Deckers2006]

Ever seen a steam column explode? What's the benefit? This is extremely poor planning in action.

[@billyrowland503]

Blue Origin, "not" NASA lander. Deceptive thumbnail.

[@stephensfarms7165]

BO, can’t even get their new rocket off the ground. Maybe Jeff will get to work, instead of going after nasa, to get his way. He has no rocket 🚀 to launch. Jeff is all talk and no action.

[@aromicgrizzly]

Blue origin can’t even get to space. Great choice!

[@ryansmith9806]

They’ve been to space, they just have not been to orbit. But they hired a bunch of people from NASA and SpaceX who will get them there. It’s business, they just hire the right people.

[@STAZ1980]

Reported for misleading title.

[@dracoQuest]

I keep hearing? We're? Gonna. Do? This. We're gonna do that this is gonna work. That's? Gonna. Work you forgot one little detait tells. Where are you going to get the personnel? Literally what this country needs is a space academy

[@deadlinefortheendtribulati4437]

There's no time the Bible is running out of time.

[@TAmzid2872]

it will only take a decade. not a millenium.

[@deadlinefortheendtribulati4437]

@@TAmzid2872 NO by the New Year 2027 all those alive on earth will being putting all their efforts on staying alive without any thing changing 23 December 2025 time is up.

[@mbb8482]

@@deadlinefortheendtribulati4437 bla bla bla

[@Parascuba]

why three company have to fight over design. why not all 3 company work together to design, they might could come up better designs

[@hansschubert5656]

Cause space x is funding the Starship Programm with that money and Blue Origin wont help them develop the starship. Sorry but what a lost question.

[@jamesmorlen8669]

That's a lie they can launch anytime they want without us knowing it and they do do it

[@MedicinalMagic]

Blue origin deserves nothing.

[@MikeBurns-bi5xj]

If i was SpaceX i move to Mexico, to avoid government interference

[@charlesault806]

If we could keep the government out of it we would be on Mars by now.

[@andynonomous8558]

That's a pretty silly thing to say. Who do you imagine would have paid for it?

[@charlesault806]

@@andynonomous8558 Private industry such as Besos or Musk.

[@andynonomous8558]

@@charlesault806 You do realize that both those companies are funded largely by government contracts right? Absent that funding neither company could have survived.

[@thomasmanson1119]

Learn the pronunciation of “deluge”

[@physicsbystanprisajny6284]

Has geomitry of an emblum

[@user-kj9no2oz3y]

Second

[@itz_anime_time_1]

The rocket is made by spacex lander made by blue origin yessssss we are americ.......,Earthians Like if you understand

[@TAmzid2872]

isnt it earthlings?

[@quietwarf1019]

Ninth. Lol🎉

[@allurbase]

So the woman chose SpaceX and then got a big paycheck? That is called revolving doors.

[@user-ww4ev3lv6x]

,😂☝️🤔😂😂🤦

[@seanbabyboy100]

First

[@InformantNet]

Whenever a KZbinr refers to him as "Elon," I stop listening because that KZbinr is a silly fanboy.

[@ThomasLee123]

There is no word in the English language called "fu-filled".

[@earth2006]

Specific A. No concrete tornadoes. Specific B. Pay off the grifters and international con-men known as "Environmentalists."

[@andynonomous8558]

And the thumbnail isn't it.

[@physicsbystanprisajny6284]

Its a nano bot nano bots are cars this on runs on magnets for heart surgury

[@mattc3696]

There is no reason to believe BO - they have never yet met a deadline, nor orbit.

[@_mikolaj_]

Then by your logic apollo 11 had no possibility of making it to the surface.

[@heldersilva8699]

Elon Musk is trying to save the planet with electrical cars and now emits tremendous amounts of CO2 with this rockets!!!

[@MrNote-lz7lh]

Grow a brain you subape. The emissions from these are miniscule compared to global emissions.

[@physicsbystanprisajny6284]

Has geomitry of an emblum for a car

[@EpicPain-]

Total bogus mouse droppings

[@Whetfaartz1]

that will never beat the Apollo Lander.

[@Michello_]

first

[@hurtfixer_]

Boooo they should of picked Space X

[@cadelepski5161]

Nah! They can't even build a launchpad 😂

[@trickeruniverse1979]

They did pick space x lol, they’re landing for Artemis 3 and 4 while blue origin got for Artemis 5 and 6.

[@hurtfixer_]

@@trickeruniverse1979 Hope your right,,

[@MX33]

Never happen 😳 Not qualified

[@craigtanner6916]

Hmmmm, I wonder who got who’s hand in who’s pocket. Smells fishy as well. Too bad, I wouldn’t want to be the astronaut landing in that contraption.

[@manueldavid7369]

BLUE ORIGIN'S LANDER is complete and utter TRASH.

[@grazynazambeanie5963]

Can we send up Joe Biden as test pilot on the next launch?

[@bearlemley]

This BO lander will be a comedy show of late fees, cost over runs, redefined terms and excuses. It will smell like BO.

[@hectorkeezy1633]

Blue origen ? They are a joke.😊

[@vegassims7]

Can I give it a thumbs down if I didn't like it? 😆

[@scostat]

What a hoax.

[@followerofjulian1652]

Elon Musk 👎👎👎