NASA Scientist's Propellantless Thrust Breakthrough - The Key to UAP Propulsion?

[@whisthpo]

Discovered or Disclosed Chris?

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Discovered?

[@armwrestlerjeff]

Lol a possibility 😂

[@Truthseeker9393]

Definitely

[@kennymcewan7281]

Disclosure they have know this for years ass holes

[@VRBug]

Disclosed, leak to NASA, told to say they discovered it now any UAP sightings will be “oh we are testing the new propulsion system, it’s all us, what aliens? Case closed”

[@TheRealVenom87]

I just wanted to stop by and thank you again Chris for what you do and sticking with it.this subject is very mentally taxing and we are so very grateful for you keeping us up to date.

[@wikkid1show569]

I also wanted to share, that this very same field was studied back in the 1920s . It's not new but the better tech and materials is why this is making progress.

[@peggygilmour8905]

In SF, electrostatic force on a starship can be used as a weapon.

[@ZionistWorldOrder]

Thomas Townsend Browns work, he says so himself

[@Tubemanjac]

@@peggygilmour8905 Oh yeah, let's not forget making war. 😞

[@ultuma]

That's right, and nothing in theory is newly discovered.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

I also know of a 120 year old UFO tech, where I'm still waiting on material science to make it possible. A warp field with a minimum of (positiv(!)) energy.

[@DaveEtchells]

A pedantic but important point: 1G is an acceleration, not a force. It’s remarkable that he got any thrust at all, but the actual thrust in terms of lb-force or kg-force are what ultimately matters. It sounds like he got 30 grams of force which is amazing, but it detracts from the presentation, hearing 1G referred to as a force.

[@citizenblue]

💯. Why aren't we using Newtons, or pounds at least.

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

30 grams of force is so enormous its your most obvious clue that this is a scam. 1 gram of force would be enough for his Nobel Prize, I mean if he would submit for peer review which we know he'll never do as it will expose his grift.

[@philjimmybob5650]

doesn't sound legit to me.

[@RexAnothership]

Ultimately the apparatus was able to make a 1 G acceleration in order to overcome gravity or else its like another ion thruster that weights 200 lbs and produces 4 grams thrust which can't overcome gravity. There are more effective strategies that can produce 100s of tons of force in a apparatus the size of a fighter jet engine. Point of fact, if you produce a 1 G constant acceleration for 365 days you would be at velocity C.

[@larryscott3982]

Yeah very questionable use of terms which convey nothing about performance. I’m not buying it. Discovering a new fundamental force is an assertion that requires far more information than this.

[@MarigoldPhoenix]

The fact that he is doing this with less voltage than T Townsend Brown is significant in its own right. Phenomenal progress for our species. I salute him and his team.

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

Isn't that just a clear sign its a scam? I mean that, the lack of peer review, the claims that violate the basic laws of physics, AND this claim it's using almost no power.

[@justin8894]

Is it AC or DC? ⚡️ 🔋 🔌

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

@@justin8894 Its MC. Magical Current.

[@zoltanszabados8445]

Wait…this hasn’t been peer reviewed? That’s not a good sign.

[@nutbastard]

I'm not defending the man in the video, but talking about power in volts instead of watts raises many flags. Voltage is a nothing figure on its own.

[@e99783]

I’ll believe it when I see it actually work

[@SagaciousDjinn]

Wanna sandwich while you wait?

[@annoyboyPictures]

LOL! I'm calling BS on this too. I mean, if you discover a New Force, the place to go is KZbin and make videos that don't even show a demonstration.... as opposed to going to some Aerospace Company, or NASA or even the Military?

[@adammontgomery7980]

@@annoyboyPictures Dr. Buhler works at NASA. He and another guy have been working on this for years. I don't get how someone who works at NASA and has a doctorate can be so dumb. I don't know exactly how their experiment is set up, but I'm guessing that they have two charged plates that move apart due to Coulomb's law.

[@arthurrobey4945]

@@annoyboyPictures Is that you, Orville?

[@andrewwibel819]

@@annoyboyPictures Dr. Buhler works at NASA.

[@SirPaulMuaddib]

Mr Lehto is not afraid to go there. Congrats on finding out about this and covering this story.

[@sitbone3]

okay fan girl.

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

Mr Lehto is not afraid to be scammed, he's the most gullible youtuber out there.

[@angeldump1three]

Yes, I want my hover board NOW!

[@Wyckoff_ape]

If this could be scaled up then use in out of atmosphere travel at a constraint thrust of 1g would mean extra planetary travel could be reduced to merely hours to several days for planets and bodies in our solar system. Estimations of travel time are below: The Moon / Luna: Closest to Earth (Supermoon): 356,577 km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 2h 22m 12s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 3h 20m 24s Mercury: Closest to Earth: 77.3 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 10h 52m 48s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 2d 1h 19m 12s Venus: Closest to Earth: 40 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 1h 5m 2s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 11h 28m 48s Mars: Closest to Earth: 65 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 7h 58m 5s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 21h 13m 1s Jupiter: Closest to Earth: 588 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 4d 0h 11m 2s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 5d 16h 2m 2s Saturn: Closest to Earth: 1.2 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 5d 17h 25m 1s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 8d 2h 20m 24s Uranus: Closest to Earth: 2.57 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 8d 9h 6m 0s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 11d 20h 24m 0s Neptune: Closest to Earth: 4.3 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 20h 7m 48s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 52m 48s Pluto: Closest to Earth: 4.28 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 19h 31m 12s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 1m 12s It could also mean that at a constant 1g thrust, travel to other star systems could be completed within a handful of years.

[@ryanakers1372]

Thanks for the calculations! Really helps put the achievement into perspective. A vehicle with 1g thrust could probably catch up to Voyager in just a few months. Really hope scaling it up doesn't present too many problems.

[@davidrobbins4857]

Paul LaViolette wrote a book, twenty years ago called The Secrets of Anti-Gravity propulsion, he gives you the history of asymmetrical capacitance and its development, as well as a wealth of other oddities. I don't believe he got the credit he deserves, this story is a pat on the back for Paul.

[@peterlandbo2726]

That's because it is too odd.

[@mrwhat5094]

Curious how this idea of making a offset gravitational current reminds me of how many UAP have been reported flipping onto the side when taking off...

[@rod3134]

This is not a breakthrough! This same technology, in the same operating description has been talked about for many decades. The difference now is that the old patents are expired and new players are attempting to re-patent them for a big payday. Anyone who's aware this tech knows the full truth behind it. I wish people would tell the FULL story.

[@Chez8922-kf6cy]

Are you like a crazy person?

[@angus433]

More likely... the technology has only recently become declassified. There are probably many 'crazy' people sitting in padded cells in medically induced psychosis because they knew about this technology.

[@angus433]

@@Chez8922-kf6cy Are you like a dumb person?

[@PhillyHardy]

Does it matter? They aren’t handing over anything, u gotta do some work I’d imagine, idk I can’t get a mhd propulsion device to throw it out my window! 😂 but if u got the money prob like a million and no one finding out and a group of devout motivated people, let me know, all we got is drawings and small scale concepts

[@rod3134]

@@PhillyHardy My reply to you is being scrubbed.

[@Oswaldfiveo]

Incredible!!!! So excited! Hey I had a thought about why the UAPs are showing themselves more now - maybe they are trying to show us this exact technology IS possible, to get us off fossil fuels, etc. that seems to be their biggest message, to take better care of the earth.

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

It is an amazing discovery. I hope it scales like they think it will

[@notyouraveragegoldenpotato]

They float around and get very occasionally glimpsed for a short blurry clip... just where exactly is this "Message" you're talking about coming from😂😂😂

[@PSA04]

Love this notion. They are our cheerleaders.

[@cory_hugs7850]

I’m pretty sure there here scoping the place out before they takeover and enslave us, we don’t have that kind of luck for them to be on our side 😂

[@buddypage11]

@@notyouraveragegoldenpotato Perhaps it is is for those that understand the ramifications of what they are observing and have the background to apply those insights in order to reverse engineer the phenomena.

[@SirPaulMuaddib]

Whether this is a reproducible thing or not is not the issue. This kind of thing should be on the front page of every scientific journal... So that they can look at it, and understand it, do their experiments...etc.. Not bury our heads in the sand and say it doesn't exist.

[@theyreoutthere.huntinggear]

Right. We could have had floating cars and speeder bikes by now

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

Its not reproducible because its clearly a scam. Our "laws" of physics are actually models built through hundreds of years of testing, and it violates all of them. His explanation is gobbledegook, you can't exert electrostatic "pressure" against a vacuum because the electrostatic force is only created by electrons and protons exchanging virtual particles. Without particles you are "pushing" against or "pulling" from there is no force, as thousands of experiments over hundreds of years demonstrates

[@TheGloryHole16]

The military industrial complex has that suppressed for obvious reasons

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

He doesn't want it peer reviewed, because it would expose his scam. There isn't a physicist on the planet who can't debunk his ludicrous claims within 30 seconds, given how well the electrostatic force has been tested and that he's claiming to violate the laws of conservation of energy and momentum.

[@johnassal5838]

Whatever else you believe this being reproducible is actually the most important thing. Otherwise it's only an unconfirmed rumor. Ironically it sounds as if this could be a major advance, if true, even if it's not reactionless. So called lifters are mostly just a curiosity due to limitations imposed by a not very aerodynamic electrode grid and low efficiency. Even if the only difference here is more efficient thrust and getting it without a grid you could still see a revolution in aerospace.

[@quipsilvervr]

I'm always skeptical when somebody makes an energy breakthrough and isn't dead. I hope they protect that guy behind museum glass. That video was absolutely not a drone. It's an extremely clear UAP video. If the breakthrough is legit, it could change everything, but if I were him, I'd be getting as much media coverage as possible and make sure people know he won't game-end himself.

[@TheRealVenom87]

I think this is tech they have had a long time and it's being released in this way to save face on the governments behalf.but that's just my opinion

[@Trader-SwingTheory]

That didn't stop Boeing whackin that witness... That was all over the news for about 2 seconds then everyone forgot about it

[@fuerLutzi]

You know these cylindrical black solar balloons we had back in the day?

[@christophercooper3479]

i hope he doesn't have anything happen to him

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

No worries, he'll be scamming this same grift on the uneducated for years to come.

[@johncaldwell9842]

Great interview. He was on Glen Beck's show a short while back, This is perhaps the greatest discovery ever made by mankind. This will truly revolutionize space travel and make interstellar travel possible. One thing here you didn't do was present the statistics on excelleration over time. I don't have them on hand but it will blow your mind.

[@TommyMissus]

This is exactly why I say *ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE* To claim something ISNT possible, is to claim to know EVERYTHING. Crazy stuff like this is going to continue to happen over and over again forever. Things will ALWAYS seem impossible when not understood, that's what happened in our history and it's happening to us right now. We always think we know everything there is to know... until we don't. *We don't know shit*

[@tammysmart4486]

Tommy- We know,,and we don't know..we are nit suppose to know what we know,, so disinformation, and blasphemy and defamation of character will remain. Your quotes were excellent.

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

This is exactly the logical fallacy called an argument from incredulity. Just because you don't know something, doesn't make it possible. We have a hundred years of scientific studies that demonstrate why this isn't possible, its a clear violation of how electrostatic forces work and the laws of conservation of momentum and energy.

[@TommyMissus]

@@tammysmart4486 👏 👏

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

To say anything is possible is a logical fallacy, we can clearly rule some things out through investigation of the universe and its properties. The basic physical rules of this universe have been confirmed through hundreds of years and millions of experiments. This guy claims to be able to break them and produce effects never seen in thousands of particle accelerator and electrostatic tests. Thats an extraordinary claim, so no one is saying it's impossible, just that it requires extraordinary evidence. Yet instead this guy has never subjected his findings to peer review or had any independent team validate his findings.

[@TommyMissus]

@@RandyHill-bj9pc no but we CANT. This is my point. We only THINK we can rule things out. It's what you believe is TRUTH, so there's no way you'll understand what I'm saying, and this is my whole point! Throughout history the ppl before us thought that EXACTLY like you do now. They base what they know off of what they THINK they know. Everything is subject to change, even "facts". It's always a possibility weve been looking at it wrong. Just as ppl say space is expanding, what if tomorrow they discover some weird bubble that surrounds our solar system that creates some sort of magnifying effect making us BELIEVE it was expanding. But before that point you would "100%" be certain all off of professional astronomical intelligence and experimentation that it was already a fact that was solid as stone. My whole point I'm trying to get at is that there's no way for you to even understand what I'm saying unless you wait 50 years and then look back at this comment. Think about how many billions of years the universe has been here, and through out all of the universes history only NOW, right now, we know what's going on ? lol what are the probabilities of that? I understand your not going to go back on your comment but I promise you, you are wrong and I will only prove you wrong far in the future bcuz when it does happen your going to be like OHHHHHH OK I get it now. And brother I understand your thought process bcuz I was once the same way. But once again, we don't know shit. Nothing.

[@lucjacques6520]

I've built a vortex propulsion drive A rotating fluidic mass can be distorted so that 3/4 of the vortex is heavier leaving 1/4 of the vortex lighter ...the key is in the fluid speeding up to the center of rotation to compensate for the distortion of the rotating fluid Thrustless propulsion

[@davemcginnis1568]

I heard him mention T Townsend Brown, this seems like an updated version of his work.

[@ShaunVillafana]

Well if you recall, bob Lazar specifically talked about there being another type of charge but not being electricity as we know it. I also believe he mentioned what we refer to as the "weak nuclear force" being actually the positive charge of protons within an atomic structure, and hypothetically, if you were to have one side of a object or craft have it's dialectric component immensely charged with electrons which are also flowing around the object towards a convexing nodal point, yes, it makes sense that the resulting propulsion would effectively be itself propelling itself without anything actually being propelled from the object, except space vector.

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Interesting thanks, I didn’t remember lazar saying that about charge

[@martinmclean4801]

Hey Chris! This has been making the rounds. Keep on it bud.

[@cgbomac2cryptic447]

I believe we as humans have the tech already perfected it's just secret. Thanks Chris for bringing this to people who haven't heard of this tech before. Your channel is really appreciated. 👌

[@fluxcapacitor]

If this propellantless thruster indeed produces at least 1 g-force (hence counteracting Earth's gravity!) in a vacuum chamber, where are the videos of it operating in full levitation? Until now, all propellantless claims were so tiny that the traces of their thrust levels were barely recorded, being deeply buried within the error bars of the background noise (and none of them moved macroscopically for the eyes to see, if you still wonder about this. Let alone take off). Thus, they were all inconclusive. Something is very, very bogus here.

[@skwdenyer]

The “test article” weighs 30-40g. The wiring, instrumentation & so on will weigh a lot more. The “test article” may not be able to support itself structurally. There’s a big difference between a piece of material generating 1g and a whole craft generating a net 1g. This thing won’t levitate. But it might be useful in space to generate continual net thrust over a long period of time.

[@RichRocketMan]

​@@skwdenyerAgreed. Plus, what is the power source? How much does it weigh?

[@rhyusarmiento6530]

@@skwdenyer but don’t you need a celestial body for it to work?

[@rhyusarmiento6530]

@@RichRocketMantrue it might require some THIC batteries

[@jamesgreenler8225]

After listening to this Im thinking we are on the right track. I would hypothesize that the UAP have discovered a few things we haven't yet so its difficult to apply the tec and get identical results because we can't fully duplicate the technology yet, but y'all are on the right track IMO. Maybe power is via a pumping action where the device powers up and then discharges every 3-4 seconds . Like an even slow heart beat .

[@GreenGibbon]

Excellent stuff! As a long time UFO buff, this news cheers me up! 🙂

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

You and me both!

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

Believing in UFOs is always such a sad endeavor. You have to believe advanced aliens discovered ways to break the fundamental laws of the universe in order to travel across it in reasonable amounts of time, and after expending trillions of times more energy than humans have ever made to come here, decline to make themselves known so they can just hang out and watch us from a distance like some creepy cosmic peeper.

[@WestOfEarth]

Incredible. These thrusters may be small, but place thousands of these together and that net positive acceleration adds up.

[@davidburfield5873]

Commentary from Eric Davis, Salvatore Pais etc would be interesting....

[@donbrearley3148]

This sounds like what Pais was talking about in his interview with Curt Jaimungal

[@davidburfield5873]

@@donbrearley3148 ....yes, Curt's perspective would also be interesting....

[@LanTurner]

How long before this gets buried and we suddenly hear absolutely nothing more about it? I give it two weeks, and we’ll never hear another thing about it.

[@glennelliott708]

2 weeks are up. Still on you tube. 87k views

[@aseriousinquiry8425]

if this isn't buried, it will probably be like fuel cell technology. Lots of promises from politicians and major companies to get money and no significant change happens.

[@jonathanpeters4240]

@@glennelliott708 This video is still up but that doesn't mean the subject isn't buried. The reality is that mankind has probably been producing ufos since the '40s, but that doesn't mean I can hop one to Paris.

[@flashkraft]

That is what will happen if it gets military funding. It will all get classified and disappear.

[@mikesmith9972]

FACTS. That or he'll go"missing"..

[@thirdsmusic]

Read the Townsend Brown biography, sounds very familiar.

[@isaacwhite7411]

I have been theorizing of a new propulsion that uses the gun effect that use a pulse thrust object and using some sort of slow down to absorb the kinetic energy from the projectile to produce internal thrust.

[@SiriusDogStar369]

Just got here. If this is true, and it feels like it is, I have one wish. Keep this man safe.

[@JohnDoe-fz5cz]

Congrats Tim. And......thank you.

[@ToddJambon]

I hope the team that made this watches their backs. People who make things that could potentially obsolete traditional energy have a bad history of not living long.

[@hugh_jasso]

Name one.

[@archetypalculinarian]

We are, fortunately, getting to a critical mass of awareness. The public is paying attention now.

[@NightRunner417]

Let's not forget that many if not most of those were con artists just trying to pull a fast one for a quick buck on grants and donations. They either got busted and had to give it up or ran away when it became obvious they were about to get it. Second thing is, the very idea that shady spooks are going around stopping everyone with a brain is absolutely ridiculous. You're seriously expecting that level of efficiency from people that can't even get their own sht straight? Also, EIGHT BILLION PEOPLE! *EIGHT BILLION* Show me ONE organization anywhere that can efficiently control the efforts of a hundred people let alone BILLIONS. You're letting your lust for conspiracy theory cloud your ability to recognize the inherent chaos and inability to coordinate that rules the human species at all levels.

[@delphicdescant]

They also have a bad history of being con artists. Especially when their "breakthrough" relies on a purely geometrical solution. Let's hope one of these days there will be a real one.

[@ToddJambon]

@@delphicdescant it's a Fed!

[@Partimepeasant]

I have seen this before as an extruder operator in PTFE , dropping the product 4 stories down it would generate an electrostatic charge that would perform the same way. The plant manager and myself were there but didn't recognize for what it was. This was around 2013.

[@FPVREVIEWS]

This is the EM drive all over again. This is also why peer reviewed studies are imperative to science. And why replication of experiments takes place.

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

You think it’s not legit?

[@martinw245]

Yes, it's currently a claim. It needs to be replicated. This has happened before and not panned out. If the results are replicated by others and verified to be valid, it will be good news. until then, we should be cautious.

[@ramonpuello2357]

Exactly. It's a cycle that we must be aware of because "they"will only let get as far until "they" decide if we're ready. If not, "they" will reset us back to the stone age.

[@xxxxMaddnesSxxxx]

This definitely needs to be peer reviewed. Even if it is legit, I worry about the powers that be suppressing it. Technology like this should not be hidden just to be capitalized. File your patent for the technology to harness it, fine, but release all your data on how it works so your discovery can be used by others in the (not unlikely) case you and your data is destroyed.

[@armwrestlerjeff]

​@@xxxxMaddnesSxxxxgreat points

[@stringstroker22]

Chris, when Dr. Buhler explained what the configuration of asymetrical capacitors, I recall the "ARV" (Alien Reproduction Vehicle) and the underlying asymmetric electro-mechanical force generator, as 2 discs rotating to generate extremely high electrostatic voltages, which would create the force to overcome gravity. It seems similar to what is discussed here.

[@gregniel]

The "Lifters" people make on youtube. . . . . same thing? They are Asymmetrical Capacitor's. Sounds a lot like Biefeld-Brown Force.

[@wonderwonder6880]

Zooming Around!!! A classic terminology. George Jetson time has come. J.L Thanks for getting this out there .....

[@jjbud3124]

Would this cause plasma to form outside the object, as in those night time spheres we see? Would the outside of the object being covered in a plasma cause the blurriness seen in most videos and photos? Just wondering.

[@heathcwalker]

I've know about Atmospheric Electrostatic energy for a few years now. For every meter up, there is a 10x voltage differential. So we basically give an object the same charge as the Earth because like charges repel?

[@timgstar3585]

Very exciting Chris.The sceptic in me is saying strange timing to come out with this now considering everything that's going on in the world right now

[@reeselynch3005]

Bob Lazar we are sorry

[@johnrdadrian]

They mention "High Voltage Capacitors". This is exactly what Thomas Townsend Brown did in 1921. While experimenting in a lab his parents had set up for him while he was still in high school. Brown discovered an unusual effect using a Coolidge tube (hot cathode tube), a type of X-ray vacuum tube with two asymmetrical electrodes. When extremely high voltage was applied, the weight of the capacitor was reduced. This is also similar to what Germans Developed during the 2nd World War, a device they called "Die Glocke" or the bell in English. This is huge, it could upend air & space travel.

[@Catkinscat]

I think there is no way they will release it to the public, I also think that if we are finding out about it, they must have had it for a long time, which makes me wonder what kind of vehicles the military have and are not telling anyone about 🤷‍♀️

[@karadan100]

You have it the wrong way round. An independent company with smart ex-NASA scientists uncover an amazing facet of physics we don't currently know of, and in two years you'll remember this video and won't be able to find it. Nor any mention of it online anywhere else.

[@mrwhat5094]

​@@karadan100not in this day. There is a record of everything, not even the president's son can hide his sugar sprinkles.

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

If he has a patent he had to disclose everything to the world. The real problem is this violates the basic laws of physics that have been tested over centuries and thousands of tests. Somehow he's claiming an extraordinary effect missed by hundreds of particle accelerators that measure everything to an infinitesimal level. Simply by( voila!) styrafoam.

[@mrwhat5094]

@@RandyHill-bj9pc what laws exactly

[@RandyHill-bj9pc]

@@mrwhat5094 Coulombs Law, Newtons Laws of Motion, The law of Conservation of Energy, the laws of Electrostatics that clearly require two charged objects to generate force between them, etc.

[@exost24]

I kinda see it as an electrostatic wing, akin to how a wing can create a pressure difference between the top (low pressure) of the wing and the bottom (higher pressure), so does an un balanced electrostatic field, or a specifically balance field.

[@gardnert1]

I feel like this was discovered a while ago but just put in the black.

[@gytis321s2]

Dude... It's not "discovered" UFO craft reverse engineering... They've been doing this for 80+ years

[@robertjames4908]

Kaluza-Klein theory has a scalar force proportional to charge squared over the mass. Being a scalar, this probably needs a highly asymmetrical arrangement to realise a vector being a force in this case.

[@Holy-Hand-Grenade-of-Antioch]

Yet to be independently verified.

[@douggraham5812]

Experiments with asymmetric capacitors have shown that there is no "new force" involved. There is still something being accelerated and "thrown out the back" to produce the reaction force, and that "something" is air. Experiments in a vacuum chamber show that the thrust decreases toward zero as the pressure of the surrounding gas is decreased.

[@FancyPants43]

I believe this will lead us into the new wave of generating thrust for our vehicles in the sky. Until we can solve harnessing the extreme powers that may be, then the two will go hand-to-hand. Very cool content, Chris! 💯

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Thanks for the support!

[@CollidingStrings]

If they used thrust or acceleration, they would make sonic booms. So, go back to the drawing board. That electrostatic type propulsion is similar to the Aharanov-Bohm Effect (sp?), it's an ether wind. Not a very robust propulsion method. Won't get you faster than light, neither will gravity manipulation, but there's actually a very simple and elegant solution. Quantum Tunneling Vehicles, that's what you want. Emulate an elementary particle, cut-and-paste teleportation at a high frequency. Elementary particles quantum tunnel, no size limit in physics for an elementary particle. Means you could fake out the universe, make one big enough to get inside of. Wiggle them fields rotating around it and trick the universe into moving you around like an elementary particle. Universe just cuts-and-pastes them where it thinks they need to be by the perturbations in their field structure. Something you could control if you were inside of the particle creating that field. Being in control of that field, you could trick the universe into making larger than normal jumps for any natural particle under ordinary circumstances. Quantum laws are built for speed, to prevent violations of conservation laws by elementary particles, they don't stop to check their work. They also take precedence over the classical laws of physics, there is no speed limit for quantum information exchange in enforcing the conservation laws of elementary particles. There is no speed limit for the particle because speed isn't involved in the calculation, just distance. The particle isn't moving, it's being re-addressed in space-time. An exploit to fly to the stars in days, without ever accelerating at all. That's what they're doing. Electric field = flying saucer, magnetic field = flying cigar. It's actually pretty obvious, I've never understood how your physicists manage to miss the easy association. No moving parts, either, just rotating an electric or magnetic field around a superconducting hull. It's that simple. That's why they call them "elementary" particles. They are very simple. No moving parts. One paragraph. Now you know how to build a starship. Oh, and if you make the field so you can extend it a ways beyond the vehicle, you can pick up and set down really large rocks. No metals, messes with the field, metallic junk gets randomly teleported out into the environment, but big granite columns or blocks, no problem. Stack thousand ton granite blocks like tinker toys, move them around like feathers. It's the field that is teleported, and anything within it. And now you know how to build megalithic sites, like Baalbek. We be learnin' alien secret stuff today, aye.

[@qaesarx]

YEAH FINALLY I WILL GET MY HOVERBOARD AND FLYING AND HOWERING CAR!!! 😀UHUUUUU 😀IMAGINE THE APPLICATIONS!!!!!

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Yes, a real hoverboard would be sweet

[@howardb.728]

Thanks for sharing this Chris - appreciated and grateful :)

[@mrparrehesian1742]

Paul LaViolette wrote Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion and talked about the B-1 Bomber using high voltage electrically charged leading edge of the wings. Electrostatics could be similar in this case.

[@phoenixrising4073]

If this were true for the B1, it would be for radar cross section reduction.

[@winkekatze5593]

Dude, I read the book you mentioned and he wrote about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the Rockwell B1 Lancer. Please, before you write something as important as this make sure your facts are right.

[@winkekatze5593]

@@phoenixrising4073 In the book it is talked about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the B1. Commenter remembered it wrong.

[@mrparrehesian1742]

@@winkekatze5593 It was a long time ago and the memory has faded. Not like you have ever experienced that. Perfect people are great.

[@jarrowmarrow]

Wow this could save us from ourselves. I was just in Utah in the gas and oil fields. The companies were in an unseemly hurry to grab as much as they could from Mother Nature. I really hope change is coming and we can utilize these breakthroughs asap.

[@surfman88]

Hopefully it gets accepted by our govie this time and he doesn’t fall from a window

[@quitequiet5281]

Awesome briefing!!!👍🎊

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Thanks 👍

[@willcabamba8262]

If you can create a vacuum in front of an object ( even 1 mm)thick then the pressure of the atmosphere behind it will create forward momentum. By moving that vacuum from the exact center of the front will give you turning direction.

[@shivercanada]

Just because it’s new to us doesn’t mean aliens use it. I still think they use an engine that creates gravity, which would be far more efficient. If you have an onboard machine that creates gravitons you can go any direction at any speed.

[@CNCTEMATIC]

My first thought on this was: if this tech becomes usable in any way, from then onwards every UFO will be written off as new experimental propulsion vehicles.

[@Sxuk]

Any working prototypes?. Very interesting.

[@Thunderbyrd.]

It was acquired by reverse engineering one of the UAP's in inventory.

[@ticthak]

If it's electrostatic force, there's nothing "unknown" about the theory, it's the application and engineering that are revolutionary- this also means development and deployment might be like IC electronics, essentially Moore's Law.

[@carlreed3571]

OK ,,,SHOW A VIDEO PROOF THE THING IN A VACUUM HOVERING

[@danbaldwin9511]

This is where I invest into this company. Just imagen what it could do in 20 years.

[@ESL-O.G.]

Well, well, well

[@karlswanson95]

Synchronized oscillations could be a promising avenue for enhancing the thrust output of Dr. Buhler's propellantless propulsion system if not already tried.

[@AP0THEKERIN]

WoW!!!

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Crazy discovery yes

[@ramonpuello2357]

It's not a discovery. It's a gift to humanity.

[@ericjohnson8586]

You the man for having this topic on

[@funkimunky1]

Buhler?....Buhler?....Buhler?

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Hah

[@nixter1nixter1]

If they are achieving one gravity of force now, they can multiply that force as required. An object being accelerated with a force of 100 Gs, such as a probe, would attempt to reach light speed within one year. This would be an extremely valuable experiment to measure the actual mass increase as it accelerated.

[@augustusgrim1446]

Wholly crrap. Star Trek here we come. Seriously, the world will be very different in 100 years.

[@funkimunky1]

Star Trek was a documentary

[@ssEbbes9349]

Hey Chris, what are your thoughts on how you would go about controlling a vehicle that is flying at incredible speeds and making crazy right angle turns etc? If humans only have a response time of about 13ms, how would you go about executing these maneuvers?

[@th600mike3]

Biefeld brown effect yet again. NASA did their best to try to crush it, now someone from nasa is trying to sell it 😂

[@edwardhanson3664]

This will not just affect space travel, it will revolutionize all human travel everywhere. This is the force that propelled an ancient human civilization all over the planet 10,000+ years ago and likely was the tool used to transport large stones while building the ancient stoneworks.

[@jasonpitts8395]

Hopefully NASA doesnt own the patent.

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

They don’t!

[@pedrosura]

More worried about DOD.

[@DeShawnGreen2001]

Yeah at least NASA would me monitored. DOD and Private Contractors hidden by layers of secrecy and compartmentalization on the other hand…

[@malachiteofmethuselah9713]

It does not matter whom comes up with it. Under the current surveillance state, they own them all before you decide it works.

[@paulberkebile5562]

I was shocked by this video; I am currently reading a biography of T. Townsend Brown and this sounds very similar to one of the projects he worked on.

[@rms5654]

This discovery means that once the initial charge is established in the 'asymmetrical drive' of a craft using this technology you wouldn't need to generate any further power to propel it, ever. You should be able to 'throttle' the 'asymmetric drive' by manipulating its symmetry to control its velocity and propel the craft.

[@onetruekeeper]

Pressure inside a combustion chamber or something bell shaped will produce thrust in the opposite direction of the open end. The pressure could be produced by sound, light, plasma or radio wave. Chemical propellants not needed.

[@brianfreland9065]

theres been other guys talking about this and demonstrating it online for years now. even on youtube a guy was showing a mini version of one and he said they removed one video really explaining it and he made another one that was a bit more vague so he could show it. they didnt discover it, they were just given permission to be the one to get rich off of it by the powers that be

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Buhler mentioned patent infringement during the chat with Tim Ventura

[@matttirado7661]

What kind of material is needed to handle the type of velocity necessary for interstellar travel?

[@grandfrosty]

I knew the information was being rolled out, it's still good to hear that it's being mass disseminated! Thanks for the great work you are doing and I love your presentation style! Clear and concise communications, very professional. And appreciated

[@chadrowlett893]

Finally TT BROWN HAS HIS DAY

[@brendabolling3424]

I informed Elon musk two weeks ago , about my experiences of having been taken on board many extraterrestrial space crafts since 1957. I have shared my experience with a myriad of individuals throughout my life, not believing my experience as truth of space travel on board these alien craft . I later learned back in 1980’s about Bob Lazar’s ability to back engineer these extraterrestrial craft . Which I had recently encourage Elon Musk to Persue this free electromagnetic energy propulsion system to harness this electromagnetic energy system for his rockets . I still maintain my communication with these extraterrestrial entities to this day. Thank’s to Elon Musk , for believing in me and he has made me feel proud , by announcing this idea to our world !

[@rpscorp9457]

Musk thinks youre a nutter...He didnt have the heart to tell you that himself.

[@dang4546]

Interesting concept. I hope they invite credible scientists to verify or reject soon!

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Yes, Buhler seems confident they found a “new force” hopefully we know one way or another soon

[@Mrfreedom2299]

I knew it was possible and it actually looks like my sketches shout out to Chris joins

[@davidmathes6730]

That one graph looks like a tic tac vertically, Chris, wow very fascinating.

[@Jman-co7xw]

You can also use frequency’s to break down the air and gravity forces around an object and propel it.

[@Cuzano]

It's a nice discovery which could leed to hover-crafts. But it's not the UAP propulsion, cause it would not allow for instantaneous accelaration and turns in sharps angles and it also would not allow for transmedial traversal in the way we have seen UAP are capable of. The only propulsion system which would fulfill at least 4 of the 5 observables (Sudden and instantaneous acceleration, Hypersonic velocities without signatures, Trans-medium travel, Positive lift) would be an Alcubierre "warp" drive which contracts spacetime in front of the craft and expands spacetime after it.

[@johnandrobinmccoy8305]

I saw an old video on youtube. A guy named Bill, a Korea war era former USMC pilot. I forget his last name. He said he was involved in the production and operation of a UFO "disk" flight simulator. Made by the US. He said the disk was mounted on a gimbal, to keep the vehicle captured, but would mimic flight conditions. I remember he said the UFO simulator had to have very specific dimensions and size, or it would not work. That seems to follow what is said in this video.

[@codetech5598]

Bill Uhouse (spelling?)

[@FrequencyRaising]

Thank you Chris Appreciate you so much.

[@muffty1337]

and for that UAP at the end: It's just a piece of plastic flying by in front of the camera. by the focal plane i would estimate 1 or 2 inches in diameter.

[@CNCTEMATIC]

My second thought was, its about time we got this technology

[@worldclassish]

Thanks for the excellent explosion my friend. Wow amazing

[@wade8130]

Fascinating stuff, wow! Thanks so much Chris!

[@NeedToKnow1947]

We do have a little power as citizens in this country. We have to show up and vote. If every open minded caring person like the people on this feed voted. The world would change. We must take the power back 🌎 ❤

[@astronorthwet636]

If it generates thrust from nothing maybe it can create its own energy as it moves. If Dr Beuhler can do that he will own the world. I have postulated this kind of thrust in a (fiction) book I’m writing. This is very important!

[@PhilTParker]

If you have a styrofoam capacitor weighing a tenth of an ounce that can produce one G of force against itself, that 1g of force per one tenth of an ounce. I’m not sure how the math works here, but it sounds like a very minute 1g of thrust which would need to be “shared” in the sense that thrust would be needed for the capacitor thruster itself and the overall ship that it is supporting. Another assumption would be that an overall thrust of 1.5 earth gravities would be needed at the end of the development effort of improving the thrust of the small individual thrusters. What would the actual drive unit look like in order to propel Starship to Mars? This is only a thought experiment. And it only assumes a Starship sent to orbit via the current booster or “Planetary Drive Booster” or PDB, which then returns planetside after delivering Starship to orbit. It goes without saying that it would be far better if the individual thrusters could be developed to the point that they were able to generate much larger thrust, perhaps three gravities each. If that were the case perhaps we could drop the entire conventional booster stage entirely. That would be the ideal ask and situation because then the only fuel is electricity stored in the individual small capacitors. Perhaps they could even be scaled up to become extremely large sized super capacitors. We just don’t know because of the beginning stage of this new science/physics that has been discovered and is in development. For now I think we need to stay with the concept of the current IPB and the IPDS that will move Starship between planets. So at the beginning Starship would boost into orbit via the PDB, detach it and send it back to Earth. Then Starship would dock with and become attached to this new “Inter Planetary Drive Section” (IPDS). Arriving at Mars, it would then park the IPDT in orbit and dock to a second PDB, which it would then use to land itself on Mars. What follows next is about the IPDS and its capabilities in making the crossing between Earth and Mars in a very short time. The mass of Starship without fuel, fuel tanks and engines is around 65 metric tons. For each of the many thruster units in the IPDS weighing 1/10th of an ounce generating it’s one gravity of thrust, assuming the thrusters can all be stacked, twenty three million thrusters would be needed which would effectively double the mass of Starship. This does not account for weight of the 100 crew, other equipment needed to support them, as well as whatever power source would be need to refresh all of the drive unit capacitors. Apparently the drive unit, once it receives its electrical energy, can run without being recharged for days, even weeks according to the scientist being interviewed. If so, half of one G continuously applied would allow Starship and its occupants to accelerate under half a gravity of thrust towards Mars, switching at midpoint to decelerate at .5gs and arriving after a mind-blowing 6.5 days. These calculations were made by ChatGPT’s new o1 preview model. There may be drastic improvements in economies of scale to reduce number of thrusters and thruster related mass, and I suspect there are. This is a worst case scenario. But what an amazing concept. Starship could deliver people to Mars in such a short period of time, and with no need to recharge any of the thrusters. It would probably be necessary to somehow discharge the electricity from all of the thrusters in the IPDS once Starship arrives and lands via the IPB while the IPDS remains in orbit. That’s about it. Once on Mars, fuel would then need to be manufactured to refuel the PDB so that Starship could then go back to orbit, dock with the IPDS and leave Mars, bringing back people, perhaps even trade goods and sample returns etc. as needed. What a concept. Interplanetary trade? Yes!

[@slamhead]

ION drives have been around for a while Popular Science wrote about it years ago. The large triangular craft that have been witnessed, like the one over Phoenix are ION driven.

[@chriscordray8572]

There's a video already out by one of the project scientists. He claimed it a giant gas bag vehicle with ion thrusters

[@slamhead]

@@chriscordray8572 Yes, I have read that it is a lighter than air heavy lift vehicle. It is basically a dirigible with an ION propulsion.

[@lsporter88]

So they have a Patent, and we're being told about it on a KZbin. That would mean that this science can no longer being suppressed. That's good. So when proper Financing is available in the Public Commercial Sector, this will move rather quickly. It's about time. Excellent video.

[@rickjason215]

Thanks!

[@Mowerman666]

This explains how they might move but what about inertial dampening to stop being squashed?