NASA STS-75 - The Tether Incident

[@cal-native]

I was the general manager of the company that created the ceramic composite spinneret through which the tether deployed. When it broke we were very concerned that there might have been a problem with our part. Though saddened, we were also relieved to find out the problem was with the cable itself😅.

[@KuroSlick]

I'm late to the party but it looks like cells attacking a virus. That aside, space creatures? Ships surely wouldn't get close enough for an accident

[@cord420247]

Bruh, we ain’t gonna acknowledge that there’s hella shit flying around it, not just “a little “debri

[@avalonsatans3160]

Hi most is space debris . But you can see some very perplexing objects Trust none of the money grubbing

[@flyersluver4eva]

@@avalonsatans3160 perplexing object lol fk off. They are UFO’s. Stop dancing round it. Imbecile

[@jeffr3773]

Smartest people in the world and that's how brainwashed they are

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@aidenf6475]

Ufo's or asteroids

[@nobodymatters3294]

Looks like jellyfish in water.

[@sc2543]

Italy on the ground we can still see it 719miles away from you Colombia & we weren't expecting to see it at 20miles away ; Colombia we'll I guess realistically speaking 719miles is in the cosmic neighborhood .. #12mile long lightsaber l*l

[@jimoberg3326]

How long after the tether broke did the dot swarm show up, do you think? Minutes? Hours? Days ?

[@MrMenefrego1]

Scripture says there's an ocean of water above the firmament (the hard dome over our heads).

[@SOLO-ts9mf]

This all looks like under water

[@KiIluminati]

These are real astronauts filming in their capsule their equipment drifted into space as they tend to record it…..

[@MrMenefrego1]

Scripture says there's an ocean of water above the firmament (the hard dome over our heads).

[@lajoswinkler]

@@MrMenefrego1 Fuck your fake scripture.

[@cuartojinete8912]

​@@MrMenefrego1😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@BigChief454]

Ignorance is bliss i see...😮​@@cuartojinete8912

[@onepunch5907]

I felt they did this on purpose to see what would happen and document it. The close up footage from the satellite tether is probably phenomenal and scary if they filmed it.

[@jimoberg3326]

How long after the tether broke did the dot swarm show up, do you think? Minutes? Hours? Days ?

[@jimbodini1969]

@@jimoberg3326 they were already there....they watched the launch they watched the deployment of the tether and probably laughed when the tether broke.....have a great day 👽🖖🏻🇨🇦🖖🏻👽©️®️™️

[@JamesOberg]

@@jimbodini1969 == Enjoy your fantasy world. The dots are ice flakes from a scheduled water dump four days AFTER the tether broke, they were small and close, as proved by the much sharper hand-held 70-mm photos the crew took out the overhead window. You know -- the photos that the UFO hucksters conceal from their target audience of gullible nitwits, who WANT to be scammed.

[@dougohboy5190]

None biological transcendental Plasma life forms....Here on Earth they are known as angles.gods, Foo fighters ww2,, etc...

[@tysontaggart7246]

​@@jimbodini1969crackhead

[@williebeamish5879]

Interesting. I was never aware of this incident.

[@TheGipoman]

That's because, they hid it ! The light's around the tether are et space craft. There's footage where the "crafts" are passing close to the tether to examine it. You can even see the craft opening a window to view the tether. Those craft are definitely not ours.

[@lenardosbornsjustice5948]

I watched this about 6 years ago. Had a hard time finding it. There is another video where five of these objects approach a shuttle close to earth it’s amazing I can’t find it but it was seriously the best footage ever. There was one video wheee you could see an object approach earth and a beam shot of earth and the ufo took off. That video caused nasa to change laws when it came to public viewing the tapes the live feeds

[@taco-vato]

There is much better footage of there. Hope it's still available. This one barely shows anything that happened

[@jimoberg3326]

How long after the tether broke did the dot swarm show up, do you think? Minutes? Hours? Days ?

[@dinogirl1able]

Also interesting that too many believe that although they have never heard of this that apollo 20 cannot be "real" because thiet government couldn't or wouldn't lie or have the ability to hide a launch ,incredible that they believe such things,Mother Russia has no reason to share this information but chose to partner with the U.S. in a rescue mission FACT

[@silvereagle2061]

I remember when this happened and I still don't know what it was for

[@shanemac1111]

Debri in the forground? They flying behind the tether. 👽

[@AstralApple]

I know. Such exposure, those in denial are just sad.

[@JamesOberg]

UFO hucksters have lied and covered up evidence about this incident from the very beginning. They tricked gullible viewers into thinking the swarm showed up soon after the tether broke away, as a curiosity reaction. The swarm sequence is actually four DAYS after the break. They concealed the much sharper hand-held 70-mm camera images the crew took of the very THIN tether, with out of focus 'orbs' [nearby small objects] passing in front. They never explained how the miles-wide hypothetical objects passing BEHIND the tether wouldn't have been as big and bright as the full moon passing through the sky of ground observers. They carefully neglected to mention how the rim notch of all the fuzzy-blob images was 'clocked' to the same angle depending on where in the camera field-of-view the objects were passing, conclusive proof it was a feature of camera internal structure.

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@willfullyinformed]

@@wozibozi Yeah you're going around spamming this on every comment, you're either a BOT, or a complete bootlicking lemming. If you looked at this footage and got "debris" or "dust" etc. then you're completely lost, breathing through the mouth. Tether was 12 miles long and FULL of energy. The objects are perfectly consistent in shape and patterns with different sizes (impossible to be debris). They are moving and changing directions orbiting the object while pulsating. Thanks

[@Angus.MacGyver]

@@wozibozi To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of the detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative comtrollers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@chonchon8836]

i see this footage long time ago, like 10 or 15 years ago, allways shock my mind. Its interesting that the astronaut says "DEBRIS".. what kind of debri is?? like a fliying glowing disk?. the universe is not what cientifics says.

[@jimoberg3326]

How long after the tether broke did the dot swarm show up, do you think? Minutes? Hours? Days ?

[@drhealth]

1995 or close to it...

[@EvaLamber]

@@jimoberg3326 через 4 дня вроде бы

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@unsatisfiedfans7422]

Correction: the universe is not what random youtube comment says

[@nfineon]

There are lifeforms at many depths and heights, some live in water, some deep within the earth, some in air, some nearly in space...

[@JamesOberg]

UFO hucksters have lied and covered up evidence about this incident from the very beginning. They tricked gullible viewers into thinking the swarm showed up soon after the tether broke away, as a curiosity reaction. The swarm sequence is actually four DAYS after the break. They concealed the much sharper hand-held 70-mm camera images the crew took of the very THIN tether, with out of focus 'orbs' [nearby small objects] passing in front. They never explained how the miles-wide hypothetical objects passing BEHIND the tether wouldn't have been as big and bright as the full moon passing through the sky of ground observers. They carefully neglected to mention how the rim notch of all the fuzzy-blob images was 'clocked' to the same angle depending on where in the camera field-of-view the objects were passing, conclusive proof it was a feature of camera internal structure.

[@regfox2000]

Petri dish under a microscope 😂

[@V___31373]

Ho bisogno, di parlare con*VOI*... IO HO TUTTO QUESTO

[@RandallFromFlorida4]

If that was debris then some of that debris was 2 0r 3 miles wide because it was behind the 12 mile long teather.

[@carlgman273]

Gotta love how the nerd from Earth @ 4:42 is shifting the responsibility to explain WTF is going on to the observers.

[@JamesOberg]

What's his name?

[@michaelburkhart4550]

Strange right angle turning, blinking debris at 3:39, bottom quarter of screen, left to right. totally normal

[@KiIluminati]

8:45 no one is talking about that gigantic UFO stationary immaculate Footage.

[@MAXIMUMF]

😂😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@Sqnry]

Call me clown all u want this is classified dozens of UFOs yes dozens !!!

[@SillySlidingSloth]

What ufo? 😂😂😂 there are no aliens monitoring us.

[@Sqnry]

@@SillySlidingSloth sorry government air force whoever u are😂😂😂😂😂

[@gbbarn]

It's rick sanchez's space cruiser

[@BabaMakhanya]

"Wheel in the midst of a wheel," The Chariots of God! 💪😤🔥🔥🔥

[@mrbraamer5645]

Lot of moving things around that tether. Could be all weather balloons. Lol. you know they were enjoying themselves watching the activity. Why else zoom into and out of the view. Else it was worth their while. Pretty awesome.

[@kevinhorne9643]

@ 1:28 in the footage is not the same as the tether fail moments. It appears to be something in a liquid medium and it is microscopic in scale. Those appear to be amoeba or paramecium moving by muscle power through the liquid medium. Something fishy going on here...

[@verycaring2387]

"DEBRIS THAT FOLLOWS US." LOL REALLY??? Looks pretty ALIVE AND PURPOSEFUL to me.

[@JamesOberg]

Well, it takes intelligence to recognize intelligence, so you fail.

[@pure5000]

They objects change speed and orbit in mid space.. these are not iceparticles

[@tonnyderuytter694]

The reason they zoom out because they can explain the so called space debris that can slow down and check the theter

[@P.F.3.]

That "debris" described in the video around the broken tether is NOT space particles. The sun dose not and cannot cause objects to flicker or cause a pulsating effect! Notice these objects are coming in from multiple directions and each are pulsating independent of each other. What are they really? I have a idea but, I'm not going to state it.

[@ryankujawa7062]

Aliens

[@chonchon8836]

its simple.. we are not alone in the universe.

[@joshuacarroll1758]

Its water creatures inside the water above the firmament

[@mtklaric]

Space plankton

[@DougieBarclay]

The sun CAN make debris flicker. The darker regions heat up and spin on its axis against the lighter region of the debris, thus causing a flickering effect. But Aliens explanation does sound fucking cool

[@Michelle-tk9jq]

Apparently space is just pond water in a Petri dish 😳

[@MrMenefrego1]

Scripture says there's an ocean of water above the firmament (the hard dome over our heads).

[@Harvey_Pekar]

Hey, you tell me, man. I just work here.

[@nirad6766]

Never A Straight Answer

[@JamesOberg]

Nitwits Always See Aliens

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@MrMenefrego1]

@@JamesOberg Close-minded people never do.

[@JamesOberg]

@@MrMenefrego1 == Who are you criticizing?

[@Angus.MacGyver]

@@wozibozi To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of the detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative controllers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@billyhill7630]

plasma?

[@TheDancingRomeo]

Anyone notice the pulsing disc shape object looks just like the image of the disc that was shot down over Alaska?

[@petergriffin383]

Looks like the dust in my attic

[@Oswaldfiveo]

I’ve never seen a satellite like that. Or one surrounded by aliens.

[@ufospacelife]

I captured many these UAP , and proved they are the energy life in space as they have face.

[@evertvanderhik5774]

Looks like out of focus stuff. Individually they all go in a straight line

[@familyoftwo7441]

Bottom right at 4.50 you see one make a 90 degree turn,how is that possible in space,without a propulsion system?

[@BigChief454]

They try to brighten out the whatever they are,so we can't see them. they must be huge and intelligent....😮

[@parrd962]

Debris in space flying around the tether I think not their UFOs and you can see they have a unique shape to them like a notch out of it . Not to mention the pulsating energy wave on the top of the craft but hey UFOs don't exist right

[@jimoberg3326]

How long after the tether broke did the dot swarm show up, do you think? Minutes? Hours? Days ?

[@googlegilbertlevinmars322]

@@jimoberg3326 great question. Those things sucked up the energy and ate the thing away !!!

[@jimbodini1969]

Look at the Baltic Sea anomaly....it looks like the things flying around the tether....!!👽🖖🏻🇨🇦🖖🏻👽©️®️™️

[@mtklaric]

@@jimoberg3326 Jim, explain the pulsating effect of the debris?

[@JamesOberg]

@@mtklaric = Ice flakes from scheduled water dumps [and this video was made at the time of one such dump] often pulse because they are tumbling in the sunlight.

[@marcodepellegrin2814]

What are they showing at Min. 01:49 ? COVIDvax with a GO nanobar floating ?

[@Chasred-ml4hm]

I hear Story Mustgrave as CAPCOM

[@evanfinch4987]

best dude ever

[@ImperialLegionTV]

Multiple objects stop, drift, or change direction. Did this "debris" have some means of propulsion!?

[@artsolomon202]

Wasn't that the whole purpose of the mission, to throw out the tether like q fishing line so the plasmoids would react and get attracted and they could capture some.

[@KiIluminati]

Lol there’s undercover governments wateva in these comments saying it’s all under water as we all know exactly wtfs “behind” that tether

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@Sqnry]

⁠@@wozibozi​​⁠​⁠actually this is what he’s commanded to say as obviously we cannot hear their private conversation in case something really unexpected happens they will not let the public hear their private conversation, these astronauts will be doomed and their whole career will be gone as everyone knows these are NOT ice particles or “little bit of debri”.throughout the whole video there are thousands of ufos no one can deny, this is raw footage this is real and what got me startled the most throughout the whole video is at 8:45 where that gigantic ufo mothership appears u can just hear the man’s voice he knows exactly what he’s looking at but he can’t just can’t say it for the fear of losing his career or something even worser happening to him after the mission. This is definitely the most authentic ufo footage that people forgot about I wish to enlighten again and for the people who believe share this to people who do not believe a single dot or diddle about space bcs this by far the most authentic leaked ufo footage that’s been forgotten and tried to be covered up.

[@MrMenefrego1]

Scripture says there's an ocean of water above the firmament (the hard dome over our heads).

[@Angus.MacGyver]

@@wozibozi To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of the detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative comtrollers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@Sqnry]

This is classified but the public won’t handle it that’s wat they say so all they say is under water😂😂😂😂

[@spazmonkey3815]

This is the most outstanding footage ever.

[@CarlSagan6]

This is 1,000% an optical effect. Not aliens, unfortunately.

[@USArmyKorea]

I can't figure out what I'm watching.

[@googlegilbertlevinmars322]

Remember folks, just China or Russia of course but not earth technology of course!

[@gan9e]

I'm here to meet somebody named Ted, I have the specimen, our Nordic friends have opened the temporal gateway and wondered if you could help, usual channels, meet us at the park bench marked M13, I'm partial to a bit of salmon but don't bring any monkfish

[@CiceroSmith-w6o]

Don't forget a towel!

[@gan9e]

@CiceroSmith-w6o under the feet

[@martinrobart3135]

Does one really think swarms of UFO’s would fly around a broken tether?? Really, it’s just debris

[@Oswaldfiveo]

He is just so obviously obfuscating. Probably been ordered to do so. Sad because there is LIFE there!!!!!!!!😮😮😮😮😮

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@MrMenefrego1]

@@wozibozi I can't read this comment you made 10000 times often enough! 🙄

[@Angus.MacGyver]

@@wozibozi To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of the detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative comtrollers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@Angus.MacGyver]

@@MrMenefrego1 He thinks copypasta is evidence. Pathetic parrot.

[@pure5000]

Some of the object are slowing down and circling around the teather and reversing.. Dont tell me thats the jets from the shuttle. If they are ice particles or something elde they would all show up in the fotage as donuts because of the shape of the shutter in the camera. This is something else than iceparticles.. There are reports of people seeing those things in space from earth.. in clusters and alone. And they are Big.

[@michaelfoster-qw2tw]

So this was a thing attached to the shuttle by a tether? And the the tether broke? There would be a lot of debris.

[@michaelfoster-qw2tw]

So there was NOTHING "alien" or "anomalous". The tether just broke, probably unexpectedly.

[@ixxxxxxx]

@@michaelfoster-qw2tw yep. lot of wackos in these comments

[@slyguythreeonetwonine3172]

*Sigh* Columbia. 💔💔

[@inc2000glw]

Pinball machine on Full Tilt !

[@AstralApple]

If these are truly ethereal beings, that means they may very well be following a toroidal trajectory, possibly encircling the globe. It would be worthwhile to chart their paths as seen in this video, and see if they really do follow Brownian motion aka toroidal vortex movement.

[@interval-space]

so much judgement of others' intent, you have absolutely no concept of what another is thinking, bias is everywhere, we are all walking around in the dark, trying to salvage what humanity we can.

[@perpetvaloctober8791]

As much as I want to believe that this video is proof of intelligent beings or whatever you choose to call it, I'm thinking it's merely space debris or some natural effect that isn't seen until the tether breaks and the cameras adjust themselves to record that particular spot in view. Making these natural space ephemera visible, although they were always there the entire time and are STILL there right now. I think it's just the cameras focusing in on that particular area in view due the tether breaking and once the cameras focus in on it, it's now possible to see these pieces of natural phenomenon that are in close proximity to the tether. I'm far from a scientist and don't pretend I know the inner workings of cameras nor do I know much about meteorological occurrences, but if I'm not mistaken, most things in nature are round and are made up of tiny particles that are round, as well. I think it's a natural effect......... THIS particular occurrence anyways. But, as far as many other videos I've seen, there's no doubt in my mind that THOSE are showing some kind of intelligent design or event. Now, nice and easy on the responses. It's just my opinion. Let's not get nasty now 😏

[@drhealth]

Well, that "stuff" is a few miles in diameter and is pulsing, and has distinct shapes, and is moving VERY fast. We are dealing with dimensional "stuff" here, and dimensional life that are NOT our friends.

[@mtklaric]

Your instincts and common sense are tuned in the right direction

[@nathansthebest]

I think your wrong…

[@perpetvaloctober8791]

@@nathansthebest okie doke

[@perpetvaloctober8791]

@@drhealth broke out a tape measurer, eh? To figure out the size of that.........STUFF??? And, as for your claims regarding interdimensional foes being featured in this video, you'll get no arguments from me, Mac. I mean, who would dare argue against that logic??? Certainly not me............BTW, could you point me in the direction on where i can get myself a nice sturdy tin foil cap?

[@arkexplorer9328]

Dudes, this is completely unacceptable. That debree picks up debree, how many moons do we need, sloppy job really!

[@ME-ke7qc]

deffo some sort of life maybe space bacteria of some sort...not little green men

[@Birdguy112]

I don’t like how this is resurfacing again 😂

[@lightman54000]

✨💎✨🙏 Hello & THANK YOU !! i Think what it's possible '' EXTREMOPHILE'' Name : Space ''Jelly Fish'' (Gelly Fish/ Méduses)

[@gino_latino]

it's so annoying that i had to go deep inside wikipedia pages to find that this happened in 1996. about july 1996. such clips are useless if you don't give time coordinates

[@SunSun108]

I appreciate the deep dive! I will look into that date and add this info to the description. Thanks for bringing this to my attention!

[@arkexplorer9328]

I like what you doing, though, super smart, keep it going, but clean up 😊

[@SunSun108]

That's the plan!

[@Angus.MacGyver]

To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of the detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative comtrollers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@wozibozi]

At the time of the incident, astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the objects seen near the tether as "a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us." The debris, he said, was illuminated by the sun. Later, John Tindall of the History Channel noted that the camera's telephoto lens was used with a circular mirror that had a hole in the middle, which left an artifact on the images. Because the images on the camera were overexposed by bright sunlight, objects appeared brighter than they were, giving the illusion they were behind the tether rather than in front of it, Tindall said.

[@willfullyinformed]

You're going around spamming this on every comment, you're either a BOT, or a complete bootlicking lemming. If you looked at this footage and got "debris" or "dust" etc. then you're completely lost, breathing through the mouth. Tether was 12 miles long and FULL of energy. The objects are perfectly consistent in shape, and patterns, and with different sizes (impossible to be debris). They are moving and changing directions orbiting the object while pulsating in the exact same copy-paste patterns/shapes. Anyone with 2 brain cells rubbing can see it plain as day, its not even in question. Read between the lines, John and others can't tell anyone what they're seeing on a daily basis. Thanks

[@Angus.MacGyver]

To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of the detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative comtrollers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@wozibozi]

@@Angus.MacGyver I’m not reading that😂 keep believing youre right

[@Angus.MacGyver]

@@wozibozi Typical for an in cel auty. Short attention span, poor/nonexistent reading comprehension, no original thinking, justs knows how to copy&paste answers from others, hive mind/echo chamber victim. I bet you're also the target audience for reaction videos, reddit posts and tiktok clips. 😂😂😂

[@annpegg413]

that looks computer generated to me

[@pure5000]

🤡

[@TheSteveSteele]

It’s just an out of focus and poorly exposed camera. Nothing unusual.

[@annpegg413]

its total bollocks to me sorry ....

[@P.F.3.]

That "debris" described in the video around the broken tether is NOT space particles. The sun dose not and cannot cause objects to flicker or cause a pulsating effect! Notice these objects are coming in from multiple directions and each are pulsating independent of each other. What are they really? I have a idea but, I'm not going to state it.

[@jimoberg3326]

How long after the tether broke did the dot swarm show up, do you think? Minutes? Hours? Days ?

[@jimbodini1969]

I’ll state what it is....it’s et and their space craft..... looking exactly like the Baltic Sea anomaly hmmmmm!?!? 👽🖖🏻🇨🇦🖖🏻👽©️®️™️

[@Angus.MacGyver]

To that annoying wozibozi in cel aut ist copying & pasting the same comment on all the other comments asking what those objects are, here's the easy rebuttal to your mindless parroting of the narrative control talking points: the recording camera's autoexposure routine doesn't work that way. If there are many bright objects in the scene, any camera's autoexposure logic would try to even out the overall exposure value of the entire frame by underexposing the image to balance the overall exposure, meaning the bright objects would become darker and more of their detail would be captured, while the dark background would become darker as a result. Autoexposure is tuned to an 18% gray card. It would be hilariously convenient if NASA or those other narrative controllers in the media would just hand wave it away by saying the entire video was inavertently left in a manual exposure mode conveniently set in such a way as to overexpose bright objects further without turning the dark background of space even grayer as a result. Also, wrongly exposing subjects in a scene wouldn't make them appear in the foreground or background of another object in the scene, but misfocusing or deliberate obfuscation or postcapture editing does.

[@P.F.3.]

@@Angus.MacGyver Wow that's exactly what David Serada DIDN'T say. Thanks for the update there Ang..