Nice gun. I have my Grandfather's mod 51 .380 circa 1920 that he bought during the US Steel strike for personal protection.
@wbmack1010 жыл бұрын
Wish they showed those particular photos of Patton with his "insurance" guns.
@rakkasan6maddog6357 жыл бұрын
Great video! Since I watched this video, I purchased a Remington Model 51 and have been so impressed with the weapon. Thanks for the video - keep 'em coming!
@Idahoguy101577 жыл бұрын
George Patton was an independently wealthy man. He didn’t have to live on a Army Officer’s salary. Apparently Patton’s upper class mannerisms never endeared him to either Eisenhower or Bradley. Both of whom were his bosses in WW2. Both of those men came from modest backgrounds.
@devinpetersen23876 жыл бұрын
Learned a lot more about Patton now I respect him.
@ShoreDude1059 жыл бұрын
It wasn't a Messerschmitt in the movie, it was 2 Heinkel HE 111 medium bombers.
@FirstToken8 жыл бұрын
The He-111 bombers in the movie Patton were not He-111's, they were Spanish post war production CASA 2.111's.
@gia17356 жыл бұрын
Most people do not know that Patton also carried a Thompson SMG. Patton's Thompson is on Display at the USMA West Point Museum. It is an M1 Thompson without the protective ears on the rear sight. There is only one photo I know of, Patton is standing in a Landing Craft and it is within arm's reach. He also laid it on his lap when riding in his Custom Jeep in hostile areas.
@Omnihil7779 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure that there were HE-111 planes George C. Scott as Gen. Patton fired at in the movie, no Messerschmidts.
@LeGTe4reZine13 жыл бұрын
that is such a beast office!
@vigunfighter6 жыл бұрын
I always admired Patton, reading one of his biographies as an 10 year old boy. As a 40 year old man I found out what he and Eisenhower did, while they were majors under the command of MacArthur, against the WWI veterans of the Bonus Army. Shameful.
@RevGunn-jq3cq6 жыл бұрын
Excellent history lesson!
@Sorrywhytescaresu6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Phil!
@flaco55814 жыл бұрын
Surprisingly MacArthur killed a lot more men by himself than Patton did. Even though they called him dugout Doug...he was quite a warrior. Would like to see his collection.
@CryptidProductions5 жыл бұрын
Is that a novelty USB stick shaped like a bullet he had the revolver sitting on? I can see the 4GB printed on the bottom.
@tomfuller42056 жыл бұрын
Why I like the revolver: "Remember the space shuttle? 300 million moving parts made by the lowest bidder!"
@speedyspooley10 жыл бұрын
Kinda wish you would had shown the pictures.
@drewschlosser267 жыл бұрын
I wish they would have cut to the photos when they talked about them
@armytaskforce11x12 жыл бұрын
I want that remington 51!!!
@alantowson77665 жыл бұрын
from Eisenhower's reminiscences..."At the same outdoor luncheon, senior officers of both British and American armies were present. Seated directly across from the King was George Patton. During the conversation, the King asked General Patton if he had ever shot anyone with the pistols he was wearing. George said promptly, 'Oh yes.' But he added, 'Really, not these pistols. These are the ones I carry socially. I carry my fighting pistols when I'm out on campaign.' 'How many men have you killed in war?' asked the King. Without batting an eye, George said, 'Seven, sir.' This was too much for me. 'How many did you say, General Patton?' Instantly he replied, 'Three, Sir.' 'Well, George,' I said, 'I'll let you get away with that.' George had often told me that during the Pershing expedition into Mexico in 1916, he and a small cavalry patrol ran into a handful of Villa's brigands and in the melee he shot one of the enemy. I think this was about the limit of his personal lethal accomplishments.
@vigunfighter6 жыл бұрын
What gun are you carrying in this video?
@blackwolfsaint35005 жыл бұрын
I wish i was half as bad as Patton loved this man
@jimmygentile10887 жыл бұрын
Insurance gun, I love that. Patton was ready for anything..
@patrickslevin642410 жыл бұрын
I have a M51 Remington in 380 caliber in excellent condition. I love that pistol, think I've only shot around 20 rounds through it as I'm afraid I might break something. It's so accurate for a gun made almost 90 years ago and, in my opinion is much better than the Colt offering. I have nothing against the Colt at all but the Remington is far and away a better designed pistol firing from a semi locked breech....did I say its really accurate? What a find, bought it brand new in the box about 10 years ago.
@clonetrex12 жыл бұрын
it does!
@MrZacfisher10 жыл бұрын
i want the pocket hammerless .380
@antiglobaljoel5327 жыл бұрын
Was it true a reporter once mistakenly referred to the grips on his revolver as mother of pearl and Patton corrected him saying "only a New Orleans Pimp would carry a gun with Mother of Pearl grips"? 😆😀
@paulsimmons57265 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing that Patton's Colt Detective Special would have been chambered in 38Spl, is that correct? My wife inherited her dad's but it was in 32CNP/32S&W. I'd guess the Army would have gone with a stronger round, just curious.
@kenibnanak555411 жыл бұрын
Remington has reintroduced a Model 51 in 9mm. It looks kind of similar.
@patrickslevin642410 жыл бұрын
Its junk.
@Idahoguy101577 жыл бұрын
Remington has recalled them, Perhaps a better iteration will come from Remington?
@MrFlathead455 жыл бұрын
Yes. The original "reissue" R51 had problems. Remington admitted it and recalled every one of them. Then they re-reissued the R51 in 2016 and its a whole new gun again. Look for the "Huntsville" models. There are early re-re issues that are "Charlette" models which is where the first R51 was made that are revamped and good guns also. The good charlettes will have staked sights. The recalled charlettes will not be staked. Avoid those.
@XMooseManX6 жыл бұрын
I own a model 51
@uratrick6 жыл бұрын
Fantastic
@Idahoguy101577 жыл бұрын
The Spanish Air Force provided German looking aircraft for the movies Patton and The Battle of Britain, Among others...
@williamray31015 жыл бұрын
i have a model 51 remington #2215
@arrlmember10 жыл бұрын
This video brought back memories of one of the guns I could kick myself for selling. Sometime during the 1960's I purchased, new in the box, from a dealer, a Colt .32 pocket pistol that I believe was part of the lend-lease program. It was parkerized instead of blued, it had larger square sights (instead of the little round ones) and it had British proof marks on the barrel. I never fired it, and I certainly hope that whoever owns it now hasn't fired it either. I have never seen such an item before or since.
@phlodel9 жыл бұрын
arrlmember I'd have fired it.
@douglasfulmer54839 жыл бұрын
+arrlmember If you buy a gun and don't shoot it, that is a disrespect to the maker.
@douglasfulmer54839 жыл бұрын
***** Yeah, those old gun makers had pride in their workmanship. Not like today, when Colt is out of business, and their work was already getting worse. I still don't see why you don't shoot it.
@douglasfulmer54839 жыл бұрын
***** Hmm. I guess different people think differently, because if I had that gun I would have a different philosophy.
@douglasfulmer54839 жыл бұрын
I don't know about the musket. I hear black-powder guns are a you know what to clean, fire, etc. Not to mention the metallurgy is awful. But I don't see the point of not shooting a pistol like what arrlmember describes. To me that is sacrilege. If you spent that much on it, make it worth it by shooting it. If it could speak that is what it would want you to do (you get the point; respect the maker of the pistol). Not 10,000 rounds a year, but maybe once in a blue moon shoot a couple magazines, try it out.
@JohnoO_O_13 жыл бұрын
In Africa the planes he shot at were Heinkel 111's surely?
@D5quared9111 жыл бұрын
Remington R-51 brought me here.
@paullytle19047 жыл бұрын
D5quared91 the original was great
@MrFlathead455 жыл бұрын
I love my R51. Great little "insurance" gun.
@ozziemederos5 жыл бұрын
He needs to rewatch the movie
@ozziemederos5 жыл бұрын
Not messescheritt
@pinz202211 жыл бұрын
Those were the "Spanish Heinkels". Franco's military used the Heinkel and manufactured it for years after WWII.
@robertunderwood19434 жыл бұрын
Cavalry not calvary !
@StewartNicolasBILLYCONNOLLY7 жыл бұрын
Patton was a great leader. However, what excuse is there for him wasting his troops on a mission to rescue his P.O.W. son-in-law?
@antiglobaljoel5327 жыл бұрын
Stewart Nicol as BILLY CONNOLLY He was trying to rescue his son in law.
@josephwolosz32056 жыл бұрын
Patton was not perfect to be sure. He thought the POW camp was lightly defended. They actually did enter the compound quickly and liberate many POWs. When they tried to return to the American lines they ran into a force of Germans and got into a firefight. Patrons son in law was wounded and had to be taken back to the camp.
@gulfrelay22496 жыл бұрын
Joseph Wolosz they fought practically the entire time,in and out. 1 thing they accomplished was to draw forces toward them, enabling a deep penetration by U.S. forces. plus drove the Germans crazy.
@dpbeast13 жыл бұрын
general patton is my cousin well hes kind 2 me or one of my anc ienters
@cal30m15 жыл бұрын
What’s the point of showing us pistols that were not his? A “run of the mill” model Colt 1908, Det Spl, and a Rem 51 are all nice weapons but your museum couldn’t even round up exact copies of what Patton carried?... most pawn shops around me will have these weapons...
@armandogonzales93045 жыл бұрын
You have to force yourself to stop saying, "Aww or uuuuh" Way too many times......