Euronaval 2022 - Day 3: EMALS, Seaguardian, S-300, TKMS and Seaexplorer

[@aurorauplinks]

This is the real Yacht Clubs. The only boats worth getting on are the ones that can defend you. This seems like an awesome club to hang out and share new designs at. Far better then fancy parties somewhere.

[@MrGufigz]

The time stamps are appreciated

[@neurofiedyamato8763]

Excellent video as always

[@NavalNews]

Thank you for the positive feedback

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

the navalized LHD borne MQ-9B Sea Guardian STOL maritime multi mission UCAV could be one decisive game changer . . .

[@dannyblackwell2426]

wow that Meko A-200 N looks well armed.

[@paulantony4598]

The TKMS A300 frigate has the punching power of a cruiser. That's a seriously armed ship with a lot of cool tech. Germany should have the sense to get 2-3 of them..

[@xxxm981]

You can be happy if we even have working ships at all, lol

[@victor6814]

Au final on a vu pas mal de matériels musclés. Comme quoi tout le monde ne cède pas à la tendance des frégates légères. Le reaper naval est effectivement quelque chose de très prometteur pour la marine française. J’aime beaucoup le fait qu'il suffit d’un simple Kit pour ”navaliser” un reaper standard. Cela signifie que les futurs télépilotes de la marine pourraient voir une bonne partie de leur formation s’effectuer à cognac. Où les infrastructures d’entraînement, les drones et le savoir-faire opérationnel sont déjà présents. Et le contrat avec les égyptiens s’annonce juteux. Il permet de vendre des systèmes complets avec les rapidfire, des mica VL et des exocet ( et pourquoi pas des narwal) et ça sans même parler des contrats qui portent sur l’électronique, les senseurs, l’optronique... mais le navire est tellement balèze qu’il reste encore de la place pour rincer les américains avec des systèmes Ram et des armes à énergie dirigée. Ça va donner un véritable joyau à la marine égyptienne, en espérant qu'ils aillent pas l’utiliser pour se taper avec Israël.

[@hugofleurence4098]

En espérant surtout qu'il ne fasse pas une bismarck Et que par peur de le perdre les égyptiens l'utilise que très rarement par peur de le perdre

[@arthurjenkins7151]

Love the music

[@MichalProzac]

I start listening to this. Oh we will hear from General Atomics, cool I wonder what news about Mr. Handy robot will be revealed. Few minutes later - what with France and USS Ford and drones? Oh this is not fallout.

[@matthewconnors8503]

What's between the quad launchers for the anti-ship missile? On the Meko A-300...

[@nasigorengpecelesteh1506]

nice

[@jodan4043]

Un S100 de la Marine nationale a fait plouf dans le Golf de Guinée ! 😬

[@thom0243]

why is the french carrier depicted with F-35s?

[@thom0243]

@@domingodesantaclara1130 how come?

[@thom0243]

@@domingodesantaclara1130 i thought they decided against a european army?

[@NavalNews]

We asked off camera: It is just to depict interoperability and the fact that the PANG with its EMALS will be able to accommodate F-35 (unlike the in-service CDG)

[@NavalNews]

@@ovr8213 You understand that in this case "interoperability" means a few US Navy aircraft cross decking with the french carrier ?

[@neurofiedyamato8763]

@@ovr8213 You don't know what interoperability means do you?

[@Richard-od7yd]

THE CREWS !!?? WHAT ABOUT THE CREWS !!?? These Machines ain't going anywhere without a Crew !!🤔🇺🇸🇫🇮🇨🇦

[@jorgesiqueira7331]

Há pouco tempo conheci o canal e confesso que a qualidade dos vídeos e também das entrevistas, são fantásticas. Depois da escolha do Brasil pelas Fragatas Tamandare que ficou entre as Meko a100 e meko a200, fico na expectativa do Brasil mais uma vez definir uma fragata de maior tonelagem! Fico no expectativa das meko a300 com 6000 tons a 7000 tons.

[@marcoscarvalho660]

A Tamandaré ficou entre a corveta e a fragata por causa da tonelagem que "enfiaram" nela. Conhecendo o Brasil, aposto que essa tonelagem se reflete em comida e combustível para tentar esticar o uso de uma corveta, não tendo em absolutamente nada a ver com tecnologia e armamentos, apenas uma gambiarra para durar mais dias na água, afinal, são apenas 4.

[@jorgesiqueira7331]

@@marcoscarvalho660 bom dia amigo ! Uma das principais características da classe Meko , é a sua modulação que se adapta a necessidade ou a realidade de cada cliente. Outra coisa não menos importante é a quantidade base das células VLS definida por categorias: meko a100, meko a200, meko a300 e meko a400. Pode até ser que você esteja certo, quando mencionou a melhora da autonomia das fragatas Tamandare. Só que tratar de forma pejorativa um projeto avaliado por especialistas e definido como um marco importante para o nosso pais, não é adequado! Pois finalmente estamos saindo da década de 70!

[@marcoscarvalho660]

Bom dia! A minha crítica não foi endereçada à Marinha, obviamente eles tomaram a decisão que lhes cabia. A crítica é pertinente ao País, por acaso se recorda da Corveta Barroso, Submarinos IKL, Fragatas Niterói e muitos outros projetos que morreram por falta de verba? O cerne da questão é que a Marinha teve de adaptar uma corveta na tentativa de suprir as necessidades atuais pois provavelmente não veremos nos próximos 20 anos mais do que essas 4 embarcações. Esse é o ponto.

[@jorgesiqueira7331]

@@marcoscarvalho660 eu me recordo sim, de todos os projetos que falou ! Entretanto, concordaria com você se fosse sugerido colocar os pés no chão, afinal, o histórico por si só, não nos favorece em nada no tema defesa nacional. Tenho grandes expectativas, assim como muitos outros brasileiros que esse cenário irá mudar e com isso, não irei jogar contra o meu país.

[@Andy-zs7bw]

@@jorgesiqueira7331 even if we assume that Marcos guy did reply pejoratively doesn't necessarily mean being pejorative is wrong. I won't make a position whether Brazilian navy is wrong or not but the point is that experts don't always act as experts, they're just human beings after all that might fell to temptation to do certain things. There are times the experts, the authorities treat other people as if they were born yesterday. That's why other people react via mockery or sarcasm or pejoratives or the likes which is justified. Just saying ✌️

[@willw8011]

2:22 he could not even keep a straight face, when he lied to you. The USS Ford is on a very special limited deployment. The USS Ford CSG will not do a full deployment and it will only have 80% of a carrier air wing on it. The USS Ford CSG is under the direct command of the US Navy's Chef of Naval Operations, which I never heard of before in my life. Why would the USN do this... the only answer is to cover-up any failures within the USS Ford. I bet there will be a lot of failures, especially with the EMALS, just like what happened for the last 5 years. Usually, a USN CSG is under the command of whatever Fleet area it is within. The Fleet area is also under whatever Unified Combat Command area. So, the USS Ford CSG should have been under the 2nd Fleet area of command within Northern Command, when it was west of the mid Atlantic point. When the CSG passed the mid Atlantic moving toward Europe, then it should have changed to the 6th Fleet and European Command area. However, it is under the direct command of the highest ranking US Navy Admiral and thus bypasses the normal chain of command.

[@lagrangewei]

putting a ship under operation command may simply be due to the desire to collect data on it performance, as the 1st ship of it class, there are many unknown, operations will want to define what the limits are then to let the fleet push the ship themselves and causing problems. I do agree that Ford is facing alot of issue, they tried to change to many system and we really don't know how the different system will gel. we will see, with the chinese EMALS equipped carrier undergoing fitting out, Ford has some time ahead of it competition, they should at least reach operational status before the Fujian.

[@willw8011]

@@lagrangewei This is not supposed to be a test and evaluation exercise. The USS Ford had 5 years of test and evaluations. This is supposed to be the first deployment of the USS Ford in a CSG. Also, the Chef of Naval Operations is not within any procumbent or test or design department. The Chief of Naval Operations is the highest officer of the US Navy. This is a position on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. There are no other positions in the US Navy higher than the Chief of Naval Operations. It does not matter what China are doing. The USS Ford replaced the USS Enterprise, which was chopped up to remove the reactors. The old USS Enterprise is in a dry dock, because its hull is being kept for a photo opportunity with the new USS Enterprise currently being built. It is way too late to make changes on the next 3 Ford Class ships. HII is currently building 3 of the Ford class CVNs: USS JFK (fitting out), USS Enterprise (hull being assembled), and USS Doris Miller (steel being cut and components being built). In 2024, the USS Nimitz will be replaced by the USS JFK. BTW, due to mismanagement, the USN has 2 CVNs in midlife refit incapable of deployment. There should only be 1 in midlife refit at a time.

[@Clonefiles]

I can see America making a drone like this one that costs 120,000

[@deanhankio6304]

Oui mais. Le futur sans personne à bord ça va devenir un problème éthique..

[@dutch6390]

Thalès...👍🇨🇵💪

[@michaelparker6907]

That's some probe.

[@christianjunghanel6724]

Why isn t germany buying those Meko designs instead of that garbage of F125/F126/F127!? Why!!!?

[@maltekronschewski8097]

What are you on about with F126 and F127? One is still in the design phase and the latter hasn't even started. As for the F125, it is a ship built to fulfill very specific mission requirements, which it does. The Navy received exactly what they asked for. By the way, F125 is loosely based on MEKO. That doesn't mean much.

[@christianjunghanel6724]

@@maltekronschewski8097 Die Mission der F125 ist mehr oder weniger die eines Überseeküstenwachschiffs(OPV : Offshore patrol veasel) welche für den Job vollkommen ausreichen und deutlich billiger sind ! Nicht selten braucht man lediglich Sicherheitsteams für den Schutz vor Piraterie ! Es ist als ob man mit Kanonen auf Spatzen schießen will! Die F 126 ist nicht mehr in der Designphase die ist abgeschlossen, tatsächlich ist sie in der Vorbereitung zum Bau welcher unmittelbar bevor steht! Man hat bereits mehrere Verträge für für Subsyteme ( Radare, Waffen Antriebsanlagen) in Auftrag gegeben ! Da wird nix mehr designed! Wenn man sich diese Kreuzer große Fregatte mal genauer ansieht dann stellt man fest das sie eigentlich eine F 125+ ist ! Was jener fehlte wurde jetzt zwar hinzugefügt, verleiht diesem 10000t Kahn aber lediglich die Kampfkraft eines Schiffes das nicht mal halb so groß ist ! Die F 127 ist in der Design Phase das Schiff wird zusammen mit den Niederländern entworfen! Es lassen sich aber jetzt schon Rückschlüsse ziehen ! Erste Designs, Ideen und Konzepte wo es ungefähr hingehen soll kann man schon sehen ! Das gute Stück soll vorallem in der Luftgewehr seine Stärken haben, trotzdem wird noch sehr viel von der F 125 in dem Schiff stecken ! Was bedeutet das wieder unnötig viel Geld dafür ausgegeben wird dass das gute Schiff Ausrüstung mit sich rumschleppen muss die es nicht braucht und den Betrieb verteuern werden! Wir brauchen keine Schweizertaschenmesser die alles können nur nix richtig , diese Art zu Planen hat noch nie funktioniert! Wir brauchen Schiff mit den man Kämpfen kann für Bündnis und Länderverteidigung und nix anderes ! Alle anderen Aufgaben sind nicht Sache der Bundeswehr!

[@maltekronschewski8097]

@@christianjunghanel6724 Okay, was die F126 angeht hast du vollkommen recht. Ich hatte verdrängt, dass die schon so weit ist. Bei der F125 bleibe ich dabei, dass das Schiff seine Aufgabe sehr gut erfüllt. Es soll lange Zeit sehr weit vom Heimathafen entfernt agieren, wozu es durchaus sinnvoll ist etwas größeres als ein typisches OPV anzuschaffen. Ob das ersonnene Missionsprofil sinnvoll ist, besonders wenn man es nicht zusätzlich sondern anstatt der traditionellen Rollen anwendet lässt sich zurecht kritisieren. Bei der F127 war mir nicht bewusst, dass es bereits eine relevante Menge an Informationen gibt. Außer der Rolle AAW und der Größenordnung hatte ich bisher nichts mitgekriegt.

[@christianjunghanel6724]

@@maltekronschewski8097 Dann sind wir soweit auf der selben Wellenlänge! 😉

[@robertwacay9827]

This vessel should Philippines arm forces needed for purchsae÷÷3units