Neal Adams - Science: 05 - Conspiracy: Europa is Growing!

Watch the full Neal Adams - Science Playlist: • Neal Adams - Science
Neal Adams Science:
This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth and all celestial bodies are growing. This collides with the Pangaea theory. Here Neal discusses evidence of planetary growth viewable on the surface texture of Europa. Watch it, you will be amazed.
For all videos, please go to:
nealadams.com/index.php/science
Download the Crustal Age Map and more at:
continuitystudios.net/growth/
To purchase the full DVD with extra footage unavailable elsewhere, visit:
www.nealadamsstore.com/Science...

[@a31ford]

Neal, Simply Put, you are at the forefront of a science that most would attempt to dismiss in some form, many, many books and ideas will have to be re-written, keep up the great work !

[@GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Thanks, Neal. This one is awesome. It's the many random lines and rifts that line up perfectly after removing the spreads. Wow!

[@randomlettersqzkebkw]

ok this video did it for me

[@lothairlondon]

ok for Europa I'm more convinced.......I'll watch some more and take back some of my previous comments. I'm not convinced its the same mechanism for all but i think you make some valid points.

[@michaelnew1962]

Thank you for pushing forward.

[@Titanic-wo6bq]

You know, it's easier to believe on Europa. After all, the ice cracks with growth, and water from inside fills in the gaps and freezes!

[@nealadamsdotcom]

1. Yes, proven by seismic readings for the Western pacific at the Ring of Fire. According to Geology's Crustal Age Map This Subduction began 60 Million Years Ago, and by simple measurement, subducted 1/40th of what the spreads revealed from 180 MYA. 2. Continents DON'T DRIFT. Oceanic plate RIFTS and spreads, and the continental plate, IMBEDDED IN IT, moves with it. These old theories do not stand the tests of verification. A ruler, Map, Paper and pencil will easily show the FACTS!

[@808pathfinder]

you learn things every day

[@GenghisVern]

I always liked the Europa cut. It's so much more obvious, moreso than the moon version (although that was a fun one too).

[@craigseamus4335]

truly spectacular and amazing

[@Newenu]

Excellent!!!

[@eyeOOsee]

Thankyou so much Neal!!! Your videos are excellent. I hope people will be open minded enough to see the common sense in what you are showing here. You demonstrate it so perfectly. Keep them coming!!! :-)

[@nealadamsdotcom]

GROWTH of the Universe. Nothing "EXPANDS" It all GROWS!

[@campeonesmundiales]

Thanks

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Think of how incredibly stupid our fellow humans are,....that here a fantastic and likely true premise is presented ,..and otherwise "GOOD MINDS" have nothing to rebut it with except for ridicule. How deep will the hole be that these "GOOD MINDS" will have to hide in when this is proven to be true! Dumbells!

[@Andrewlohbihler]

The more I watch this, the better it gets.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Pair-Production gives us all the Electrons of the UNIVERSE!.......Which constitutes more than ONE THIRD of the Particles of the UNIVERSE! The REST of the matter is made of PAIRS!

[@bontrom8]

I've watched your first five videos, and am hoping to find one that looks at geodes. As a kid i wondered how geodes got their surface, it seemed strange and : as a kid this was not epic: impossible to form. I look forward to perusing your whole set. Thanks, this is very interesting.

[@RuudLoeffen]

In October 2022 we will see new very detailed observations of the surface of the moon Europa. We will see a process like seafloor spreading on earth.

[@GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Subduction ! SUBDUCTION ! S U B D U C T I O N !!! Haha, just kidding. That's how a modern scientist argues. LOL

[@nealadamsdotcom]

After reviewing, I found the GEODE VIDEO is only on my site at nealadamsdotcom the science section. It's kind of a support video. I too examined Geodes for years and damned if the outside doesn't look like a moon.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

It has to move somewhere. Where would it go? Icebergs move in the oceans, but when it's on a solid ice area where can it move TO?

Glad to have open dialogue here. So many complaining Neal is taking away comments. I see why, they are redundant, by the book arguments and no original constructive points of view based on seeing with our own eyes. :D peace.

[@Chrisntracy7707]

ok I can see what you say but what are the straight lines. even after its growth. cracks would look like cracks not straight lines? some sort of life?

[@nealadamsdotcom]

No, they are CRACKS and pushed up edges of these cracks.

[@TheElevatr]

Wouldn't Europa's orbit affect tidal liquid and core overall? So the cracks you are seeing that you are pointing out, are counteracting with the dismissed "I don't think much of all these ridges and elevations." Kind of tit for tat. One opens because of the other.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

JIM, MY ANSWERS IN CAPS Jim Noland Please articulate where this "matter" that is being added comes from. THIS NEW MATTER COMES FROM THE SAME PLACE THAT THE UNIVERSE OF MATTER CAME FROM IN THE FIRST PLACE AND CONTINUES TO INCREASE ON-GOING TO MAKE THE MATTER UNIVERSE "GROW"! THE PROCESS BEGINS AND CONTINUES WITH PAIR-PRODUCTION! WHICH IS THE CONVERTING OF PRE-MATTER TO MATTER BY IMPACTING TINY EM FIELDS WITH HIGH-ENERGY PHOTONS! THESE PRIMITIVE PARTICLES OF MATTER, POSITRONS AND ELECTRONS, CONTINUE TO COMBINE INTO HIGHER EVOLVED PARTICLES AND ATOMS OF MATTER! Solar systems are born out of the accretion disk left over from supernovae. UTTER NONSENSE! IN AN EARLY UNIVERSE THERE ARE NO SUPER-NOVAE,...SO HOW DO YOU GET SOLAR SYSTEMS TO BECOME ANYTHING????? JUNK-SCIENCE!

[@herculesrockefeller2984]

Does the expansion of the universe have anything to do with this..?

[@RAtargi]

is this all over the Europa? I am not a earth scientist nor astronomist but I think this is a solid case if this is seen at "back" and "front" of Europa. Today they are talking about water on mars, which seem contradict other claims that mars can't have liquid nor air...

[@Fridaey13txhOktober]

The means of observation on Earth are more advanced today than in the 1960s and 1970s, hence NASA and friends had to come up with new claims to explain contradictions with their previous claims.

[@redsneakers10]

Well, it had to happen, didn't it: "Evidence for subduction in the ice shell of Europa," Nature Geoscience 7, 762-767 (2014).

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Jim. My notes in caps! Jim Noland Europa is constantly being pull and compacted NNNNNNO! IF YOU, OR ANYONE EXAMINES THE SURFACE OF EUROPA, YOU WILL EASILY SEE ALL THE "LINES" ARE "SPREADING" RIFTING LINES! by the insanely powerful gravitational forces of Jupiter. GIVE YOUR PROOF OF "COMPACTING"! There are parts of the surface ice that get pulled apart and there are parts of the ice that get crushed together. NO, IT DOES NOT! It's incredibly violent tidal forces that create these cracks and ridges. The moon isn't growing... YES IT IS! it's being pulled and squashed AGAIN PROOF OR EVIDENCE! The only way for a planet or moon to grow is if it acquires significant material from surrounding bodies such as asteroids and that process is pretty much over for our solar system. REALLY???? THEN HOW DO WE GET A "MATTER UNIVERSE" FROM "NOTHING?"

[@nealadamsdotcom]

A balloon EXPANDS when filled with air. A child Grows. An explosion expands when material is LIT. A watermelon GROWS! They may be on a list of synonyms, but they ate not the same. If you don't SEE this with clarity, Go home.

[@campeonesmundiales]

All moons all planets all suns all universe are growing

[@luismontoya3804]

Science 05, hay 10

[@nealadamsdotcom]

You added compressed hot air! The UNIVERSE DID NOT! If you don't add hot air, the balloon won't "blow up"! Perhaps on fine day you will understand the difference. Please come back when you know the difference.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

1. No, you NEVER have depended on FACTS as opposed to Theory, until I JUST mentioned it here. It's a NEW THOUGHT TO YOU! 2. No. These theories are BASED ON FACTS! You are completely incorrect. 3. If you are too stupid to read, you should not parade it. I SAID I accepted subduction at the western Ring of Fire, as proven by seismic readings. I corrected your ignorance of "continental drift". YOU are simply "RANTING". I fill peoples minds with FACTS! They must THINK!

[@nealadamsdotcom]

error Crystals GROW! Geodes GROW! In FACT, the more matter being added, the more heat and the more molecular assembly and processing happens.

why should this not be standard view of our universe? it's simple in it's theory yet as you show very easily defined with proof. when too many factors are introduced into sc-i-ence that is a red flag to separate people's common sense into the pyramid structure known as elitism which I hope stuff like this you are sharing helps make that pyramid crumble . thanks for another so called 'alternative' view point. Nasa sucks.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

JIM, MY RESPONSES IN CAPS. Jim Noland Oh dear.... No Neal, that not how matter is formed. SO, YOU, OF ALL PEOPLE ON EARTH "KNOW" HOW "MATTER IS FORMED". ARE "YOU" GOD, SIR???? BECAUSE NO ONE I'VE EVER HEARD OF KNOWS "HOW MATTER IS FORMED! Several seconds after the big bang neutrinos and protons formed, PROTONS???? ARE "FORMED?" FROM WHAT? Several hundred thousand years after that the universe had cooled (COOLED? IT WAS HOT? UMMMM, WHAT MADE IT HOT? WHAT WAS IT THAT WAS MADE HOT??? enough for atoms to form )ATOMS TO FORM????? FROM WHAT? QUARKS? BUT,.....QUARKS ARE MADE OF WHAT? AND YOU ARE SAYING QUARKS CAN EXIST IN THE UNIVERSE INDEPENDENTLY? NO THEY CANNOT, SIR! and several hundred million years after that proto suns and galaxies formed. LOOK. I LIKE FAIRY TALES AS MUCH AS THE NEXT GUY. BUT, TO REPEAT FAR-OUT THEORIES AS FACT, IS IDIOTIC!!! As galaxies merged and formed larger galaxies, enormous suns in these systems went super nova "LARGER GALAXIES GAVE BIRTH TO ENORMOUS STELLAR SYSTEMS"????? JUST LIKE THAT? HUH??? MAN, YOU ARE GOD!!!! SORRY, GOD, I CALL B.S.!

[@richard-yz6cz]

nealadamsdotcom you need to set up a debate with scimandan, he dosent like your theory at all.

[@richard-yz6cz]

@@nealadamsdotcom totally agree with you, one question Neal, do you know the ratio of active mid ocean ridge to active alleged subduction zone, it seems a bit lop sided.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Why terrified? Why hide behind a NAME???? Unless you are terrified? My name is Neal Adams. Do you understand the ramifications of this theory? 1. Let's say this last is, instead a Question. NO, our technology is not sophisticated enough to spot the GROWTH, NO MATTER how much you religiously believe in the god of technology. No, Pangea has no FACTS! Just theories.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Do you recognize this? "The reason you never heard about this theory is because of the evidence against it." THAT,.. is a clear attack. Back it up.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

You really don't know what you are talking about. What you ARE talking about is THEORIES. To lay them low, I depend on FACTS! Unassailable FACTS! I dismiss Ice? What are you talking about? OH,...Europa. Got it. Ice doesn't rift and spread. It compresses and pushes up,...but if it's frozen Ice, why doesn't it look like Antarctica?

[@kashmir1008]

This is where your ignorance shows and you don't even realize it. In science, "theory" means a scientifically acceptable general principle offered to explain phenomena. Einstein's general theory of relativity has been proven, as have plate tectonics and natural selection - it is theory, not speculation, conjecture or a hypothesis.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

It IS at the forefront of a backward "science". Pangea Theory and what used to be called Pangea Theory are the same age. And what is your point? There is NO FACTUAL EVIDENCE against this. The FACTS SUPPORT IT. Only terrified Theory is against it. YOU are like them and are terrified BY the FACTS. One should not listen to intellectual cowards! How dare you sign yourself Patrice Lumumba.