Nederland - Engeland 2-0, WK kwalificatie 1994

Samenvatting Nederland-Engeland 2-0, 13 oktober 1993.
Cruciale kwalificatiewedstrijd voor het WK van 1994 in de VS.
61' Ronald Koeman 1-0
69' Dennis Bergkamp 2-0
Stadion: De Kuip
Toeschouwers: 46.000
Scheidsrechter: Assenmacher
Gele kaarten: Ronald Koeman, Frank Rijkaard (NED), Tonny Dorigo, Paul Ince (ENG)

[@user95-sssr]

Geweldig om terug te kijken. Voetbal lijkt veel leuker toen.

[@JRS2510]

Fantastic goal, fantastic player KOEMAN

[@Wrestlelesson]

Voor dit elftal juigde ik met hart en ziel. Dit was echt knokken voor de bal bikkelen. Toen voetballers nog echte helden waren.

[@MarcoHuisman]

Nu, 12 jaar na je opmerking, is het nog veel kariger

[@wizebeard]

jonge jonge, werkelijk iedereen verwachtte een doffe knal van Koeman maar dan doet tie het zo. Dan ben je echt een held hoor.

[@RezaKazazi]

Wonderful Dennis Bergkamp

[@adm2002]

2:56 - "He's gonna flick one now, he's gonna flick one, he's gonna flick one, and its in!" - Brian Moore (ITV) (1932-2001, RIP)

[@Wrestlelesson]

Wat een elftal dat waren nog 's strijders wat mis ik deze elftal. Ongelooflijke meesterwerk 3:37 - 3:49

[@aledorta3796]

Uno de los defensas más completos que ha dado la historia del fútbol mundial. Gran líder de la línea defensiva y excelente organizador de juego desde la retaguardia. Bien colocado y contundente cuando era necesario. Jugador con excelente visión de juego y capaz de dar un pase milimétrico de gol desde su posición de líbero. Pases cortos y largos de gran precisión adornan su calidad como mito futbolístico. Por si fuera poco, era un consumado especialista en los penaltis y en las faltas a balón parado, gracias a su sobresaliente precisión y potencia de disparo. Era un jugador muy temido cuando se sumaba al ataque, gracias a su capacidad goleadora, apoyada en sus fulminantes y terroríficos disparos de media y larga distancia, convirtiéndolo en el defensa más goleador de todos los tiempos con 253 goles. Nunca hubo, no hay y nunca habrá un defensa más goleador que Ronald Koeman.

[@chrismooney9275]

The World Cup deserved to see Tony Dorigo

[@koncsaj]

Didn't he set up David Platt's goal in the 1990 3rd place playoff?

[@DannyBoy777777]

The referee was German as well. He was banned from refing iny more internationals after this one.

[@iananderson3799]

Germans hate the Dutch. They would have got no favours there. Spunky's positioning cost both hoals.

[@seffbergkamp4877]

Everyone forgot the clear Dutch goal(Rijkaard scored) that was disallowd. Dont forget to bring that in if you want to mention Koeman lucky foul

[@14mooler]

@MichaelDemimonde I respectfully disagree: As for Van Basten: he tried 2 years to get back to the game but he couldn't make it. At the time nobody thought he was finished, otherwise he wouldn't go under surgeries on his damaged ankle to recover. As for Gullit: The reason he played only 1 game is because he was substituted in half time against Scotland and he walked off the camp. Both the coach and Koeman tried to make him change his mind and play in the W.Cup, but they couldn't succeed.

[@garagegymbros2198]

In '95 came new stars like Overmars, Kluivert, vd Sar, Seedorf, Davids. Imagine v Basten, Rijkaard, Koeman and Gullit where born 2 years later and the Ajax talents one year earlier, this dreamteam could have won the World cup in '94. vd Sar; Wouters, Koeman, Rijkaard, F.deBoer; Seedorf, Gullit, Davids, Overmars: v Basten, Bergkamp,

[@haythijs]

Van Basten was injured in 1994, although he did not play any game since the CL final 1993, he stil was a player in 1994. Gullit left the Dutch squad during the preparartion in may1994, he didn’t support Advocaat his strategy when they were about to travel to the USA. So in fact Van Basten and Gullit cluld still have played there, if not Marco his ankle refused and Gullit just went aling with the squad.

[@Danrfc181086]

Even as a Scot I have to acknowledge a shockingly poor piece of refereeing with the Koeman foul.. I have to say though my favourite bit of the video is at the guy in the crowd with the amazing taché! Check it out at 5:01.

[@jimbob8973]

Seaman had an absolute mare, completely out of position for first goal and should've easily parried the second

[@thomasdgreen]

First time I've seen this since I was 13 and watching live. I remember the Koeman farrago of course, but that high tackle later on is even worse. Nowadays that would be a straight red and a lengthy ban, by far the bigger injustice.

[@sajjadsoheili8651]

Koeman, the best kick taker ever !!

[@jonathanteasdale4412]

Better than Beckham,Zidane, Carlos, Maradonna, Batistuta, etc etc etc etc etc. What lens glasses you have?

[@denniseinhaus3606]

@@jonathanteasdale4412 yes he was.you can argue about carlos. Google his stats as a defender/libero.250 goals in 500 matches for a defender

[@aledorta3796]

​@@jonathanteasdale4412 Sin ninguna duda. Ronald Koeman es el mejor lanzador de faltas de la historia del fútbol, por colocación y por potencia

[@HolySoliDeoGloria]

If the offense started outside the penalty area, but continued into the penalty area, then, according to Law 12, "If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick." It's almost impossible to tell whether the holding ended outside the area.

[@doosterhuis]

Kwamen we goed weg met geel voor Koeman ... zou je vandaag de dag niet meer mee wegkomen. Wel een stel knokkers, met Wouters voorop, geweldig.

[@paranalia]

Ik was erbij...geweldig _O_

[@14mooler]

@MichaelDemimonde : Gullit was not on the bench at Sampdoria: According to his coach Erikson " he was playing the best football of his life in his 5 years in Italy" He played so good that season that Milan got him back for the next season, and he was recalled to the national team; although his disagreement with the national coach, along with Van Basten's injury hurt Holland's chance of winning the W. Cup. Also, Van Basten was not retired yet; he was still trying to comeback. He retired in 1995.

[@dariuszpiatek6489]

yes, I agree, you are right, but he was called for the World Cup in the USA, but unfortunately he resigned .. the reason was to prepare for the game for AC Milan back

[@mrjefferies90]

You can tell who the referee wanted to win

[@BlaBla-jj6sh]

Probably England, as he disallowed a Frank Rijkaard goal not shown in this clip for offside, where it wasn't offside at all.

[@williamdmason9375]

Jefferies THE REFEREE DOTH PROTEST ......ANGLETERRA CUÛTÒU , ZXŽŶÎÔ.......ŽXÇÌMPÈ

[@FT24]

Yes England for sure. Rijkaards goal disallowed, wouters denied a penalty because its was inside. And yes koeman should have a red card but it wasn't a penalty.... England team was shit that days, they didn't deserve to be at the workdcup

[@superlex611]

where is gullit and van basten and van breukelen ? what happen to them ?

[@tlonsinkie]

Kun je de eerste wedstrijd in Londen er ook opzetten?

[@pujiyanto6804]

Tim orenye salah satu tim yg jadi favorit saya

[@1995CL]

De vrije trap moest zelfs nog opnieuw genomen worden omdat er een van de Engelse spelers te vroeg uitliep! Jammer dat dit niet in de opname zit.

[@maxrobespierre2570]

Probably the most painful game of football that any England fan has ever watched

[@ZAOUWV]

England was absolutely better

[@remkovdb]

die vrije trap van koeman is ging de eerste keer in de muur.. (maar is niet in deze video) maar mocht over genomen worden i.v.m. te vroeg uit komen van engelsen

[@1995CL]

Klopt helemaal, ik zoek dat moment nog steeds! commentator: 'Koeman! Nee... 'Moet overnieuw!'

[@Duuk_the_Dog]

Wouters liep trouwens ook veel te vroeg uit.

[@Razor8318]

zo die aanval vanaf 3:37, prachtig.. het echte Nederland

[@AlexanderBecker2009]

Clear red card for Koeman.

[@SeventiesMania]

@entopic Objectively, you are right on the last man thing. The directive for red cards on this came at the same time the offside rule was changed to include players level with the last man as onside: at the start of the 1992-93 season. So by the directive, the ref should have sent Ronald K off and given a free kick. Objectively :-)

[@ShadowZero1980]

I thought those rules were changed later?

[@MichaelDemimonde]

@14mooler They got Gullit back for...8 games. He was soon off talking about sexy football in England. He got two more caps for Holland. Van Basten didn't play many more than that this season either, and never again after the european cup final. The point is, that's where those three were by this match: finished, whatever Eriksson might have to say about it..

[@DaynePeachman]

Fantastische goal Koeman, zo schiet Messi ze nu ook wel eens binnen.

[@weareallequal6370]

oh dat wist ik niet

[@astrojax69]

the dutch approach reminds me of a certain world cup final recently... the english style was also recognisable, though.

[@hassel1908]

Tegen zouden de Koemannetjes met rood van het veld gestuurd zijn.

[@rahmanramli7818]

To be successful at international level England should develop more skilful players and not rely on long balls all the time... fortunately we have emerging young talent like Sancho..Rashford.. Barkley..Maddock..Bamford..and others.

[@slasheh]

the argument is koeman, and his brother, should have seen red. holland had the better team but england were cheated out of it.

[@sammievb2304]

Respect voor de *scheids*

[@SeventiesMania]

@petrusaloisius I'm English and you know what - you are right! This Holland team had more right to be at the finals than Graham Taylor's useless crew. But I'm a bit biased, I always loved the Dutch teams, since the 70s. I was even sorry to see Bertie's side lose the final. But entopic is right on the last man thing ;-)

[@MichaelDemimonde]

@14mooler Right...the point being that Advocaat didn't miss him and didn't need him. The Dutch should have beaten an average Brazil (aside from their forward pair) anyway, there might have been room for a 27-year-old temperamental Gullit in that team, but I don't think Advocaat cared. The Dutch looked good and were putting together the team that was the best in 1998. I seem to remember 'career-threatening injury' being the phrase attached to van Basten for the whole of 1993.

[@rockingrugger]

1:50 Nigel de Jong style?

[@chrismooney9275]

How far right was David Seamen!?

[@honesta2707]

Super geil man

[@spacedigger]

I believe his hair hasn't changed at all throug the years :P

[@weareallequal6370]

erwin koeman is toch ronald koeman of is het een andere koeman

[@Duuk_the_Dog]

Rood kaartje voor Koeman eigenlijk.

[@nubjealvin]

hoe oud was je toen:P

[@justincredible.]

Waarom kreeg koeman geen rood??? Echt veel meer doorgebroken kun je niet zijn.. Erwin had ook gewoon rood moeten hebben.

[@user-qy8dk5tw7n]

❤❤😊

[@studiefinanciering]

waar is dit? In het olympisch stadion?

[@mh9649]

studiefinanciering De Kuip

[@AtGiza]

Say oooh aaah Ed de Goey, say ooh aah Ed de Goey!!!

[@leander24]

"Het is nog lang geen sinterklaas" haha

[@14mooler]

@MichaelDemimonde Also, Bryan Glanville of "World Soccer" magazine, wrote after the 94 W.C that "with Gullit, Holland could have defeated Brazil ". That is hardly the definition of a finished player. Why would a club like Milan (at the time, arguably the best team in the world) get back a "finished" player for next season, specially at a time that only 3 foreign players could play in each game? However, I agree that after getting back to Milan, he was never the player who shined in Sampdoria.

[@InvisibleYetVisible]

lol, that's one hell of a rant. England were probably good enough to beat the Dutch that night but they definitely let what happened go to their heads. But as I said, the red card was a red card, yes, but that doesn't make RK a cheat. That makes the ref a cheat. You're only a cheat, if you 'CHEAT' the referee. Technically the ref saw it, he decided that this was the correct decision, he was wrong, he was a cheat by cheating the English. But Koeman wasn't a cheat, the ref was.

[@PoorlyJudged]

Advocaat's hair is the real highlight. Check it out at 3:07

[@30secondsovertokyo]

the coat too!

[@MrSLB90]

@BoyBangla 1993...this is the qualifiers

[@AnneBoersma]

BERGKAMP!!!

[@karatebuff]

Ultimate revenge 2 years later though!!

[@wozardofiz1242]

Advocaat nog met zijn badmuts op!

[@flashhart2000]

If that happened now Platt would have grabbed his shin and rolled around for a while, But De Jong's should have been a straight red

[@mistermolly2007]

die 1ste goal van NL is toch een bal voor de muur kan de keeper toch niks aan doen?

[@Rich6Brew]

A bent ref if ever I saw one.

[@coventrydavid]

@jordonoNL but if a foul starts outside the penalty area and continues inside it is a penalty. Which it was. Which the referee gave at first!

[@willemranck4791]

🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱💖💖💖💖👍👍👍👍

[@Santos043]

Toen voetbal nog voor echte mannen was 😅

[@blrich3316]

Plat is ook niet doorgebroken hoor hahaa.......ongelovelijk dat je toen geen rood voor kreeg.

[@rickelmonoggin]

Never like to see that, players trying to get other players sent off.

[@spacedigger]

What I don't get is why they cover theyre nuts haha I would be more afraid the ball would fly straight into my face.

[@bbqbod]

wow refereeing certainly has changed

[@ZAOUWV]

Engeland was beter dat jaar en had naar het WK gemoeten

[@MichaelDemimonde]

@superlex611 This is 1993, van Basten and van Breukelen had retired, Gullit was over 30 and on the bench at Sampdoria. Just enjoy Carlton Palmer's Cryuff turn.

[@Cyberpoohleec]

@kaylonW its 93, back then it was a yellow card

[@ripspique]

I never understood why those English wankers were calling Koeman a cheat. He made a red card offence and Assenmacher only gave him yellow + a free kick (relying on his linesman). So what´s the deal here?!

[@Robert_030]

wat een vreselijk commentaar

[@paranalia]

13

[@Michael367697]

So what? He could have scored in the CL final for the Pope and stll would be what he is.

[@jordonoNL]

No penalty, he started outside with the pulling. so its a freekick

[@jppennypincher9051]

Two red cards out of the gate here. Limeys got robbed and I am no fan. I sometimes wonder if they were screwed outta USA 94 because the hosts didn't want them there.

[@CCDevlin]

we can all see here that seaman was not that good.

[@danielpeti3885]

This was a red card for R Koeman. The Ref was a cheat .

[@Robert_030]

and your "fans" really disbehaved

[@danielpeti3885]

robertsasyannick I'm not English so they are ain't my fans

[@ronhoek69]

Today it would be a red card. But today isn't 1994.

[@fanfam]

Today they would role over 15 times to be sure.

[@haythijs]

The referee was, forgot to the goal of Rijkaard in the first half too...

[@AFCA23]

Bye bye England!!!!

[@deanporter846]

Koeman

[@stoogemund]

D.I.V.E.

[@alvinsiwft1234]

The ref or didn't know the rules or he is a cheat that's all.

[@DannyBoy777777]

Your mad mate. No chance.

[@flashhart2000]

Koeman was lucky that's all the Ref was the fucking cheat (I'm not Bitter honest)

[@glennvanzeeburg7539]

lol 2 twins ronald koeman edwin koeman frank de boer ronald de boer

[@ShadowZero1980]

Ronald and Erwin Koeman aren't twins though.

[@FuroraCeltica]

Koeman should have been sent off

[@Richardtv1968]

Yep should have been sent off, but wasn’t

[@maartenvanleeuwen4481]

Which one?

[@ZAOUWV]

Both . True indeed

[@Zw0LsDaLe]

wat een verschil met het elftal van nu. heeft niks meer met Nederland te maken. het hele spelletje is verpest

[@elgerto]

Wat een slechte ref zeg.

[@honasvdv8397]

WELKE SPELER LOOPT DAAR MET EEN INTER TAS??? WELKE FLIKKER DOET DAT???

[@earthpotential]

@PoorlyJudged Very funny.

[@johanprx7985]

If this game was played nowadays both Koemans would have been sent off. Would that be a first that 2 brothers get a red card in the same game playing for their nation?

[@rockyslay4310]

Blah blah

[@ShadowZero1980]

I find it an interesting question actually!

[@morpethtown77]

Ronald Kuntman

[@swarthoogt]

Koeman held Platt outside the area, while Holland should have had a penalty later on. In the end England was the lucky team.

[@deanporter846]

Norman should have been red carded for the foul on Platt.