NEET-UG 2024 row: Ex-professor of IIT Kanpur debunks IIT Madras report, says report was rushed

[@sandeepmehta3328]

First release of 24lakh students data in public domain or in court to make input for analysis .

[@048khatijatulkubra3]

True

[@poonamranjan981]

Tathastu. Kal aa gaya order.

[@tusharchhari1034]

1:45 is not rank it is no. Of candidates on that marks.. Please don't spread fake news..

[@AMScienceYard]

Bhai vahi to keh rha hu

[@AMScienceYard]

Mujhe re exam hone na hone se fark nhi padta lekin ye log to galat info de rhe h

[@AMScienceYard]

@@ayushmanglik8624 haa bhai yahi chij Mai bhi dhundh rha hu

[@Content1827]

Abe pagal mera 652 pe 27000 rank aayi hai aur graph ko dekha jai toh 650 ke upar 15000 bache hai

[@AMScienceYard]

@@Content1827 bhai yr vahi to keh rha hu ki graph number of candidates versus marks hai Rank versus marks nhi

[@NamanTambi-cg1pn]

Are didi Rank vs Marks ka graph nhi hai wo....No.of students vs Marks ka graph hai.....😂😂

[@ayushkaswan5984]

To 650 per 12k student thodi na h

[@NamanTambi-cg1pn]

@@ayushkaswan5984 mere bhai data khud bhi analysis karega tho pata chalega ki iss par same marks par 1000+ bache bhi hai

[@ayushkaswan5984]

@@NamanTambi-cg1pn ha wo to h par Yaha to 12k likha h wo kya h

[@Wanderlust826]

​@@ayushkaswan5984 is liye Tu Tu pagol hai no of student between a specific score naki all student no from rank 1 diya hai.😂.khud se analysis karle tu to bedi log nahi hai na

[@achlavirmani8534]

Madam ji...651 marks ki rank 28000 not number of people having 651 marks are 28000 Rank suggests that 28000 students have scored marks from 651 to 720 So total number of students having marks 651 is not 28000🤦‍♂️ The bell curve shows number of students scoring a particular score range vs marks...not rank vs marks

[@ayushmanglik8624]

Share this to mainstream media and lawyer representing students asap.

[@adi_hennry]

Bro all the info shared are totally fake ye share karne ke baad bejati channel ki khud ki honi hai

[@niloy_646]

​@@adi_hennry😂👍

[@AjitJanke]

​@@adi_hennry okk tu hi sahi hai 😅😅😅

[@adi_hennry]

@@AjitJanke arre Bhai wo baat nhi hai mai galat bhi ho skta hu Aisa nhi hai lekin bro inhone Jo iit Madras pe jo kichad uchala hai na wo mujhe bilkul thik nhi laga kyuki bro it was my dream college aur mere uncle wha profesor hai yrr isliye mai ye keh rha hu

[@KheloAurKhilao]

@@adi_hennry chinta mat karo bhai tum sahi keh rhe yeh log no of candidates aur rank mein confuse ho rhe , samajhne pe samajh nhi rhe toh kya hi Kiya Jaa skta

[@adi_hennry]

To all those misguided fellows sitting here and listening to ma'am I would like to point out few things 1. The ex Prof told that the inflation would be constant that is a complete rubbish because the marks increased by the student is bound to be more in higher ranges of marks Lets say last year 720 was scored by 4 people and this year 8 people and for 620 it was increased from 150 people to 200 then the increase is of 33% here then it appears it's an 100% increase on scale of 720 range but very less on range of lower marks, hence it shud be a case of cheating because for them it's not same but how does this make sense 2. False narrative of 6 student It was before the reneet on 23 june now the rank 62 is held by a person scoring 716 so please correct your info 3. Claims of skewing the data How can it be possible that the top 1.4 lakh student has scored the marks between 0-300 does it makes any sense and also it's clearly written on the bottom that it's made from all students who appeared if compared with that of 2023 a regular trend to shift towards right is seen but according to them it's wrong. Also you guys haven't mentioned this but it SHOWS THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS who scored that marks not the rank are you an idiot or what. 4.Claima by Vivek Thakur This guy owns a coaching institute that has not produced any rankers unlike last year so please be mindful of whom you take as reference please he is also an IIT alumnus but still he doesn't know anything about IIT. Last but not least GUYS I am going to upload a video regarding why the analysis of data is not wrong and debunking few other claims done by people and please help me spread this message nationwide because being a student IIT Madras holds a special level for me and many other students so please I request you..... Video shall be uploaded soon....

[@simranparween8297]

Wahi na,Channel ka name batao...

[@thenativefrequencies]

Exactly the re neet guys want to go to any extent to proove themselves

[@gyaaniakshat]

These guys won't listen to you because they think that only they are true.

[@snehadebnath223]

👍🏼 we'll share your video

[@bhanuprakashpatil3576]

Keep us posted.

[@radhasrasoi6777]

Please circulate this msg to Mainstream media and group of lawyer who are representing the case for ReNeet

[@Sjsjdjdkdmenehdh24]

Don't worry it's fake.....only iit madras analysis will be considered

[@AjitJanke]

​@@Sjsjdjdkdmenehdh24 okk iit Madras has member of nta 😂😂😂😂😂

[@adi_hennry]

Bro what in the world is she saying 😒 can't she look the graph is between which two factors ​@@AjitJanke

[@1111username]

​​@@Sjsjdjdkdmenehdh24who said it's fake ...it's you .... IIT kanpur professor was not fake...

[@sasathishkumar5791]

No RENEET. Try to score good marks. Do not create confusion. Why should the innocent students also should be punished. Punish the culprits.

[@vrijendrasingh3736]

I fully agree with Prof Sanghi's view. There is a terminology known as spurious correlation. The analysis done by IIT M is a nice example of this. They must understand that both the events are independent so such type of analysis is of no use. its a clear case of corruption and must be handled accordingly and not by giving a new direction of solving a math problem.

[@parveshmalik8740]

Don't spread fake news this graph don't represent ranks

[@maddiharshareddy1269]

It means no reneet

[@mrigankasekharroy7482]

Inhey koi samjhao 720 , 6 logo ke grace sey miley thay jo ab nahi mil rahey ab topper list 67 se 61 ho gaya hay

[@fructose12]

wahi to, itna misinformation faila rhe hai

[@niteshroyal30]

The anonymized data should be made public for anyone to perform the analysis.

[@aritrasaha5718]

1:43 NTA and IIT Madras should be suing y’all for defamation

[@anikanikanikanikanikanikan1672]

If the govt dont want reneet then release data on public so that students will tryst nta that nothing happened in the exam

[@Nyebyo2332]

​@@BrightLifeNEET 23 lakh aur kyu nahi ho sakta 1gb ka pdf file hoga 2 din lagega analysis ma

[@KheloAurKhilao]

@@Nyebyo2332 toh neet ki taiyaari nhi karni ?

[@KheloAurKhilao]

@@BrightLifeNEET yeh log kuchh bhi bol rhe hum inlogon ko genuine maante agar yeh sab kuchh bhi karke sirf yeh bolte ki doshiyon ko kaise bhi karke dhoondo aur hatao , yeh nhi ki jaldi se doosra chance do

[@anikanikanikanikanikanikan1672]

​@@BrightLifeNEETq nhi daal sakta....CJI was not brainless person he also said the same thing....are you cheater who is trying to become Munna Bhai doctor

[@BrightLifeNEET]

@@anikanikanikanikanikanikan1672 I talk practically Not illogicallly like you Pehli Puri bat pta kr phur kisi ko cheater boliyo Saale khud ke to 300 bhi nhi hoge jrur

[@adityavikramchandel8764]

6 people now have not received 720

[@kulindrasrivastava3394]

Sor 6 ppl getting 720 marks is not included in iit madras report ...pls check before u speak bcoz its on new result published

[@aritrasaha5718]

That was due to grave marks, which was later removed. 5 out of those students appeared for re-exam and all got 680+

[@saketsingh965]

​@@aritrasaha5718 doesnt deny the fact that half of the students didnt appear in the re examination who got grace marks 😂

[@aritrasaha5718]

@@saketsingh965 no you fool, they were given the marks they scored WITHOUT the grace marks

[@kulindrasrivastava3394]

@@saketsingh965 they didn't appear bcoz half of them were not intially qualified remember out of 1563 only 800 something was qualified....y don't u have ur facts right before u start commenting on anything it shows how poorly educated ur and only relies on 2nd hand information

[@AkshatAggarwal-zu7kh]

​@@saketsingh965half of the Student who got grace mks did not even qualified or scored 164 so no point of appearing in re neet for them Aadhi jaankari de na tumhara janam sidh adhikaar hai

[@69583]

this is correct graph ,don't question iit madras

[@farsanamuhammed6512]

Yes

[@NeerajSharma-yv6tw]

Acha😂

[@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r]

iit kanpur and kharag pur vs iit madras

[@saketsingh965]

Control to Govt. hi kartii hai na 🤡

[@rasmitarout286]

no reneet

[@Pdutta35]

I would really urge the NTA and ministry of education to file a defamation suit against you and all other KZbinrs for spreading fake information and creating havoc

[@gyaaniakshat]

True. I would urge them too

[@IndRB7]

selfishness at its peak.

[@gyaaniakshat]

@@IndRB7 what about your selfishness

[@Pdutta35]

@@IndRB7 don't moral police us you second chancers are nowhere ideal. Bring valid proofs from trustworthy authorities not some random interview on a random KZbin channel which holds no accountability before court.

[@Nyebyo2332]

Dude if you look at the no candidates thats only rank suppose around 650-720 20000 students were there so the rank of the student getting 650 is 20000

[@arijitmondal3328]

6 students from same centre ki bat kiu ho rhi hain ? Re examination ke bad to wo students to list se bahar ho gaye

[@baiqmu09]

Hame maaf krdo.... Please khtm kro yeh sab. Har din yeh sab bakwass. Nahi chaheye koi reneet Hame, Hame sukoon chaheye.... Woh dilwah do meherbani #noreneet

[@sudhirrathore3613]

Pdf reh achha score lakke bhi 3rd class college me

[@Sazid-j5q]

yes 😔

[@gyaaniakshat]

​@@sudhirrathore3613ha padh lenge kyuki mbbs khatam karvane mein college se jyaada bachhon ka haath hota hai

[@fructose12]

yeh log genuine students ka dimaag kharab karke chorenge, kya pagalpanti hai sablog corrupt hai bas ye reneet wale sahi hai 🤡🤡🤡

[@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r]

@@fructose12 laevorotatory ulti soch

[@sidhartha_maji]

You are just providing tweets of some random ... unapproved TWEETER handles... shame on you.. please verify each....

[@souravgorai3345]

Don't spread the fake news just for getting views!!!

[@69583]

please analyze the graph properly this graph doesn't show rank but the students between specific range 😂

[@sidharth-mx2lf]

it's Students vs Marks graph and not Rank vs Marks...& who is she to question IIT Madras..😂

[@fine1895]

Syllabus is reduced, syllabus was changed , something was removed and something was added 😢

[@wise-ee]

first of all those 6 topprs from same centre are now no more toppr because their grace marks have been removed and 5 of them have attempted retest ...... secondly if there's a issue regarding rank inflation then lets be clear here that some factors are there which will never show a similarity between year to year curves of rank inflation...........1) the syllabus was reduced lets say 20 -25 ...(2) there is a huge boom in online education from 2023 onward which is easily reflected in last years cutoff also...(3) the students freshly appearing are more or less not from the covid batch means improved first and second year concepts ...(4) increasing aspirants (5) remote areas and rural areas are now exposed to higher education bcoz of pw unacademy and other online classes ....pw with almost 5-10 lakh students alone studying for neet ...how will you expect the same curves after all this... plz explain if needed

[@Mons-q5f]

All points are useless except syllabus reduction but also the question level was similar to previous year.

[@venust28]

Exactly , people are just straight up ignoring the increasing competition and trying to blame everything on leak. They are not seeing there is also 3 percentile increase in jee mains cutoff which is equivalent to 20k ranks approx.

[@AjitJanke]

​@@venust28 they are studying from pw last 3 years 😂😂😂😂

[@venust28]

@@AjitJanke try to understand the effect of COVID. I don't know about you but my 11th 12th was during COVID times and it affected me. I needed to take drops to reach where I am now. And also online was a new concept and people needed time to get used to it. Now people are comfortable with it . And thus you see the results.

[@simranparween8297]

Upar se pura paper match the column type k qs se bhara tha 40+ ,jo ki thoda soch k option eliminate kar k solve kar sakte Hain, 2022 me board exam late se hua tha,neet ka exam July me hua tha, jo students us year drop kiye neet 2023 k liye unhe 9 months ka time mila, lekin neet 2024 k liye pura 1 year mila wo bhi reduced syllabus Inflation to hona hi tha

[@CR-jo1sx]

Every one wants to be famous now😂😂

[@ksunildrdo]

Syllabus is not adhered and many questions came out of Syllabus. Questions in T3 Booklet came out of Syllabus sir. In Physics, as per new syllabus mentioned, 4 Questions came out of Syllabus. They are question number 10, 14, 21 and 23. In Botany Question 137 and in Zoology Question number 194. Why deleted questions were asked in Question Paper?

[@apseeiitm]

Ab ye neet , IITs me ladayi karwa kar manegi 😂

[@pratyushmishra2850]

Sir 6 students getting 720 from one centre issue was because of grace marks....and that has been already resolved by a retest...now those 6 students have noy secured 720

[@anilachintabathina2245]

IIT Madas Bell mouth analysis is waste report

[@ksunildrdo]

Where can we get IIT report on NEET? I am not finding on Internet. Please sahare.

[@mayankkashyap619]

Omg😂😂IIT is an institute not an university..😂😂

[@apseeiitm]

It is certainly more reliable than universities in India ... Btw IITs are deemed to be universities and can make their own courses for higher education in India be in engineering, humanities science or arts

[@josephantonybrittoa2318]

​@@apseeiitmIIT Chennai misleading SC so IIT Chennai must be questioned by Supreme court

[@anikanikanikanikanikanikan1672]

Release data on public

[@sandeepkumargupta921]

Then please share this to main media and centre

[@DarshanKutagulla]

With due respect sir, how about the retakers percentage which would have elevated the marks/rank inflation? We are not seeing the statistics from NTA that there are so many retakers this year at each center and are these the students who have scored well?

[@India_bharat_678]

Uneducated professor... don't even know that those 6 toppers form one center is no more valid...but came here just to get publicity Shayad budhape mein dimag satak gaya hai so please go and have an appointment of a psychiatrist No reneet ❤❤

[@S-M-B]

Inki amaa ka graph 📈

[@EssKay7023]

Ye kaise professor ban gya ise yetak toh pata nhi chala ki graph students vs marks bta rha not rank vs marks 🤦🏻

[@SumitThakur-vk5mp]

Unfortunately gut feelings cannot prove mass ppr leak in supreme court 😂

[@Abutani-q2e]

They have to pay heavy consequences for the misdeeds .

[@mahmudulhasanlaskar5200]

Plzzzz Send this informative vdo to reneet supporting advocate of supreme Court or else to alakh sir bcz what iit professor and adv. Tweets have some sense to clarify iit madras data analysis. Bcz most of them r merged with nta's dirty game

[@anitakushwah6158]

भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान दिल्ली (आईआईटी-डी) के एक विशेषज्ञ ने राष्ट्रीय पात्रता सह प्रवेश परीक्षा (नीट-यूजी) 2024 पेपर लीक मुद्दे पर राष्ट्रीय परीक्षण एजेंसी (एनटीए) के कहने पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट को सौंपी गई आईआईटी-मद्रास की रिपोर्ट में खामियां निकाली हैं, जिसमें दावा किया गया है कि परीक्षा में बैठने वाले 23 लाख छात्रों के लिए अंक और रैंक वितरित करने के तरीके में “कोई असामान्यता” नहीं थी। Suorce-The Hindu

[@OmkarGarje-rq8rb]

Misleading video😂😂😂😂😂

[@AnanyaSahoo-u7x]

Some tweets are fake....they understood the graph wrong

[@Shekhar-su9dn]

INFLATION IS 4 TO 5 TIMES AT EVERY LEVEL...

[@rekhadevi4634]

Meanwhile before 18th we will make ready of the data,it would be great to avoid judgement postpone

[@kamalkiku]

Sir, you are right. I too feel the same.

[@brijeshbhatt6400]

Stop misleading people with the wrong interpretation. Just study the graph carefully.

[@baiqmu09]

Yeh media wale toh sirf apni trp badhane Mai lage hain. Inko news tadka chaheye woh b Hame stress de k

[@Devraj-xx7ew]

Might be professor's grandson scored 600😅

[@EduIndia-k9u]

Fake u it's a fake😂😂😂😂

[@LabakishorRajkumar]

Enough is enough

[@babuavnish5456]

This video says that who are in the group of corruption.

[@josephantonybrittoa2318]

If SC says no RE NEET then there will not be any fair and transparent exams in future everyone will quote SC order

[@rojeramom7198]

Gut feeling of ex professor . He doesn't have any proof

[@HimanshiYadav-ds5yr]

Pahle graph padhna seekh lijiye fir apni trp badhaen Jhoothi report mat publish kiya kare

[@Nidhsinksh]

The 6 toppers from the same centres are not topper anymore.. they got 720 due to grace marks... Dr. Dheeraj please don't spread any fake news 📰....

[@shivamkumar-jt1zs]

Jis kisi ke pass harsh dubey bhai ka no. Ho uspe ye video share kr doo bahut tagda prooff hai reneet ke favour me.. ❤❤❤❤❤

[@user-cw5tm6qd5q]

Why do you want to mask up? From NTA and Dharmendra Pradhan perhaps! More logical.

[@kaladevi1575]

Money changes everything😹

[@UnemployedCrafter]

And it's rank not no of students . Plz rectify it or delete this video .u r just spreading rumours . What will happen judge will decide ! Don't worry

[@aarush1002]

Please share this video to lawyers representing students in Supreme Court they will put forward a hard argument towards CJI..

[@sakir6774]

Why are you spreading false news

[@bprem7094]

Report this channel for fake news

[@kishorekumar-re7tt]

Yup.. students started studying hard and work jee also has increased the percentile than 2023.. please check Jee mains and advance by these professors then talk about NEET ..CBI had also given clean..

[@Sbtakj]

But still previous year they had 43 toppers....this year it can be justified but in neet it's not the same case

[@fizakhan4252]

Exactly

[@fizakhan4252]

​@Sbtakjexactly

[@ashish_MBBS]

So same inflation should happen at each level of percentile if the paper was easy why there is so much inflation in the higher mark range and less in the lower mark range ?? Exactly opposite of what is normal??

[@wise-ee]

​@@Sbtakj of all those 6 topprs from same centre are now no more toppr because their grace marks have been removed and 5 of them have attempted retest ...... secondly if there's a issue regarding rank inflation then lets be clear here that some factors are there which will never show a similarity between year to year curves of rank inflation...........1) the syllabus was reduced lets say 20 -25 ...(2) there is a huge boom in online education from 2023 onward which is easily reflected in last years cutoff also...(3) the students freshly appearing are more or less not from the covid batch means improved first and second year concepts ...(4) increasing aspirants (5) remote areas and rural areas are now exposed to higher education bcoz of pw unacademy and other online classes ....pw with almost 5-10 lakh students alone studying for neet ...how will you expect the same curves after all this... plz explain if needed

[@AnjaliVerma-e9z]

Kya hai yarr hum ko ye db nahi chahiye tha hum logo ko bs ek government medical seat chahiye tha stop all this rubbish don't make our emotions matter of fight all are fighting to be popular jaldi se decision aaye we can't handle it longer 😢

[@AnjaliVerma-e9z]

Wanna accept it and move forward whatever decision is taken by SC

[@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r]

noreneet ka agya hai likh ke lele agar hua to nanga chakkar lagaunga pure delhi ka

[@Harsh.S.A.H.]

6 ppl thing is related to grace marks plzz.....don't retell old stories

[@tokerlinkhonglah7574]

If reneet, ministers and bureaucrats will have to refund the parents 🤣

[@TanishkaDances01]

Ab kya hoga re ?

[@nagraj1373]

IIT should compare from450 to 720 comparison hike.False report supporting NTA and BJP

[@h_himmler]

All the hype for a course [mbbs] that produces drs with poverty! Useless course 😮

[@radhalakshmi3040]

Re neet for all

[@sagarmendirattasagar5080]

FAIR RE NEET MUST TO CLOSE ALL DISPUTED CHAPTERS AND DISCUSSIONS

[@ArbazMaster]

Fake news channel Please report for fake info and misguiding students

[@namratarajak369]

Please raise voice for re neet

[@asherdayne6157]

tell him to debunk cbi reporr

[@arijitmondal3328]

Didi english bahut accha bol ti hain .cbsc wali hain

[@UnemployedCrafter]

Mrittika ji plz don't spread fake news . I know u r KZbinr . U don't know much about NEET and HOW analytics work . I know u r here for million views . But plz don't do anything just for some money . If you don't know plz be quiet.

[@sagarmendirattasagar5080]

great

[@shubhamyadav-sy6vy]

pls share with alakh sir

[@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r]

that man is cheap bastard atleast would have provided financial help

[@baiqmu09]

Agr itne hamdard hain toh Jo itne rape, drugs, etc k cases hain unhe discuss kro ... They are just hypocrite

[@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r]

repes are womaens fault wera proper cloaths

[@baiqmu09]

@@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r and what about those small girls who are not even reached to their puberty age are being raped?

[@pratimak2223]

#reneet for all

[@soumyadeeproy1497]

Disliked👍

[@mohanlalchoudhary1866]

Publish complete result of all neet 2024 aspirants in public domain

[@FaizKMR]

Gmc udhampur cutoff

[@Crick.light.]

# reneet

[@OtherS-dv3ex]

Reneet is only solution ✅✅✅✅

[@sunilj1866]

RE NEET IS ESSENTIAL

[@AmitMallick-yg6wl]

RENEET

[@devanshagrawal3449]

Re neet 2024

[@Panda-jq1su]

☕

[@Harsh.S.A.H.]

Fake

[@Amit-m7y2j]

Spreading fake news

[@ankitsharma1635]

#RENEET HOKAR RAHEGA

[@Mlk877]

Sir kya bakwas kr rhy hoo

[@048khatijatulkubra3]

Re neet

[@kishantiwari9765]

Bs yhi chahiye tha ...ki koi is IIT Madras ke farzi data ko bhi claim kr de ...thank you sir 🙏

[@vyral-dhun.mp3]

6 hai hi nhi ab kuch bhi mtt bolo