First release of 24lakh students data in public domain or in court to make input for analysis .
@048khatijatulkubra33 ай бұрын
True
@poonamranjan9813 ай бұрын
Tathastu. Kal aa gaya order.
@tusharchhari10343 ай бұрын
1:45 is not rank it is no. Of candidates on that marks.. Please don't spread fake news..
@AMScienceYard3 ай бұрын
Bhai vahi to keh rha hu
@AMScienceYard3 ай бұрын
Mujhe re exam hone na hone se fark nhi padta lekin ye log to galat info de rhe h
@AMScienceYard3 ай бұрын
@@ayushmanglik8624 haa bhai yahi chij Mai bhi dhundh rha hu
@Content18273 ай бұрын
Abe pagal mera 652 pe 27000 rank aayi hai aur graph ko dekha jai toh 650 ke upar 15000 bache hai
@AMScienceYard3 ай бұрын
@@Content1827 bhai yr vahi to keh rha hu ki graph number of candidates versus marks hai Rank versus marks nhi
@NamanTambi-cg1pn3 ай бұрын
Are didi Rank vs Marks ka graph nhi hai wo....No.of students vs Marks ka graph hai.....😂😂
@ayushkaswan59843 ай бұрын
To 650 per 12k student thodi na h
@NamanTambi-cg1pn3 ай бұрын
@@ayushkaswan5984 mere bhai data khud bhi analysis karega tho pata chalega ki iss par same marks par 1000+ bache bhi hai
@ayushkaswan59843 ай бұрын
@@NamanTambi-cg1pn ha wo to h par Yaha to 12k likha h wo kya h
@Wanderlust8263 ай бұрын
@@ayushkaswan5984 is liye Tu Tu pagol hai no of student between a specific score naki all student no from rank 1 diya hai.😂.khud se analysis karle tu to bedi log nahi hai na
@achlavirmani85343 ай бұрын
Madam ji...651 marks ki rank 28000 not number of people having 651 marks are 28000 Rank suggests that 28000 students have scored marks from 651 to 720 So total number of students having marks 651 is not 28000🤦♂️ The bell curve shows number of students scoring a particular score range vs marks...not rank vs marks
@ayushmanglik86243 ай бұрын
Share this to mainstream media and lawyer representing students asap.
@adi_hennry3 ай бұрын
Bro all the info shared are totally fake ye share karne ke baad bejati channel ki khud ki honi hai
@niloy_6463 ай бұрын
@@adi_hennry😂👍
@AjitJanke3 ай бұрын
@@adi_hennry okk tu hi sahi hai 😅😅😅
@adi_hennry3 ай бұрын
@@AjitJanke arre Bhai wo baat nhi hai mai galat bhi ho skta hu Aisa nhi hai lekin bro inhone Jo iit Madras pe jo kichad uchala hai na wo mujhe bilkul thik nhi laga kyuki bro it was my dream college aur mere uncle wha profesor hai yrr isliye mai ye keh rha hu
@KheloAurKhilao3 ай бұрын
@@adi_hennry chinta mat karo bhai tum sahi keh rhe yeh log no of candidates aur rank mein confuse ho rhe , samajhne pe samajh nhi rhe toh kya hi Kiya Jaa skta
@adi_hennry3 ай бұрын
To all those misguided fellows sitting here and listening to ma'am I would like to point out few things 1. The ex Prof told that the inflation would be constant that is a complete rubbish because the marks increased by the student is bound to be more in higher ranges of marks Lets say last year 720 was scored by 4 people and this year 8 people and for 620 it was increased from 150 people to 200 then the increase is of 33% here then it appears it's an 100% increase on scale of 720 range but very less on range of lower marks, hence it shud be a case of cheating because for them it's not same but how does this make sense 2. False narrative of 6 student It was before the reneet on 23 june now the rank 62 is held by a person scoring 716 so please correct your info 3. Claims of skewing the data How can it be possible that the top 1.4 lakh student has scored the marks between 0-300 does it makes any sense and also it's clearly written on the bottom that it's made from all students who appeared if compared with that of 2023 a regular trend to shift towards right is seen but according to them it's wrong. Also you guys haven't mentioned this but it SHOWS THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS who scored that marks not the rank are you an idiot or what. 4.Claima by Vivek Thakur This guy owns a coaching institute that has not produced any rankers unlike last year so please be mindful of whom you take as reference please he is also an IIT alumnus but still he doesn't know anything about IIT. Last but not least GUYS I am going to upload a video regarding why the analysis of data is not wrong and debunking few other claims done by people and please help me spread this message nationwide because being a student IIT Madras holds a special level for me and many other students so please I request you..... Video shall be uploaded soon....
@simranparween82973 ай бұрын
Wahi na,Channel ka name batao...
@thenativefrequencies3 ай бұрын
Exactly the re neet guys want to go to any extent to proove themselves
@gyaaniakshat3 ай бұрын
These guys won't listen to you because they think that only they are true.
@snehadebnath2233 ай бұрын
👍🏼 we'll share your video
@bhanuprakashpatil35763 ай бұрын
Keep us posted.
@radhasrasoi67773 ай бұрын
Please circulate this msg to Mainstream media and group of lawyer who are representing the case for ReNeet
@Sjsjdjdkdmenehdh243 ай бұрын
Don't worry it's fake.....only iit madras analysis will be considered
@AjitJanke3 ай бұрын
@@Sjsjdjdkdmenehdh24 okk iit Madras has member of nta 😂😂😂😂😂
@adi_hennry3 ай бұрын
Bro what in the world is she saying 😒 can't she look the graph is between which two factors @@AjitJanke
@1111username3 ай бұрын
@@Sjsjdjdkdmenehdh24who said it's fake ...it's you .... IIT kanpur professor was not fake...
@sasathishkumar57913 ай бұрын
No RENEET. Try to score good marks. Do not create confusion. Why should the innocent students also should be punished. Punish the culprits.
@vrijendrasingh37363 ай бұрын
I fully agree with Prof Sanghi's view. There is a terminology known as spurious correlation. The analysis done by IIT M is a nice example of this. They must understand that both the events are independent so such type of analysis is of no use. its a clear case of corruption and must be handled accordingly and not by giving a new direction of solving a math problem.
@parveshmalik87403 ай бұрын
Don't spread fake news this graph don't represent ranks
@maddiharshareddy12693 ай бұрын
It means no reneet
@mrigankasekharroy74823 ай бұрын
Inhey koi samjhao 720 , 6 logo ke grace sey miley thay jo ab nahi mil rahey ab topper list 67 se 61 ho gaya hay
@fructose123 ай бұрын
wahi to, itna misinformation faila rhe hai
@niteshroyal303 ай бұрын
The anonymized data should be made public for anyone to perform the analysis.
@aritrasaha57183 ай бұрын
1:43 NTA and IIT Madras should be suing y’all for defamation
@anikanikanikanikanikanikan16723 ай бұрын
If the govt dont want reneet then release data on public so that students will tryst nta that nothing happened in the exam
@Nyebyo23323 ай бұрын
@@BrightLifeNEET 23 lakh aur kyu nahi ho sakta 1gb ka pdf file hoga 2 din lagega analysis ma
@KheloAurKhilao3 ай бұрын
@@Nyebyo2332 toh neet ki taiyaari nhi karni ?
@KheloAurKhilao3 ай бұрын
@@BrightLifeNEET yeh log kuchh bhi bol rhe hum inlogon ko genuine maante agar yeh sab kuchh bhi karke sirf yeh bolte ki doshiyon ko kaise bhi karke dhoondo aur hatao , yeh nhi ki jaldi se doosra chance do
@anikanikanikanikanikanikan16723 ай бұрын
@@BrightLifeNEETq nhi daal sakta....CJI was not brainless person he also said the same thing....are you cheater who is trying to become Munna Bhai doctor
@BrightLifeNEET3 ай бұрын
@@anikanikanikanikanikanikan1672 I talk practically Not illogicallly like you Pehli Puri bat pta kr phur kisi ko cheater boliyo Saale khud ke to 300 bhi nhi hoge jrur
@adityavikramchandel87643 ай бұрын
6 people now have not received 720
@kulindrasrivastava33943 ай бұрын
Sor 6 ppl getting 720 marks is not included in iit madras report ...pls check before u speak bcoz its on new result published
@aritrasaha57183 ай бұрын
That was due to grave marks, which was later removed. 5 out of those students appeared for re-exam and all got 680+
@saketsingh9653 ай бұрын
@@aritrasaha5718 doesnt deny the fact that half of the students didnt appear in the re examination who got grace marks 😂
@aritrasaha57183 ай бұрын
@@saketsingh965 no you fool, they were given the marks they scored WITHOUT the grace marks
@kulindrasrivastava33943 ай бұрын
@@saketsingh965 they didn't appear bcoz half of them were not intially qualified remember out of 1563 only 800 something was qualified....y don't u have ur facts right before u start commenting on anything it shows how poorly educated ur and only relies on 2nd hand information
@AkshatAggarwal-zu7kh3 ай бұрын
@@saketsingh965half of the Student who got grace mks did not even qualified or scored 164 so no point of appearing in re neet for them Aadhi jaankari de na tumhara janam sidh adhikaar hai
@695833 ай бұрын
this is correct graph ,don't question iit madras
@farsanamuhammed65123 ай бұрын
Yes
@NeerajSharma-yv6tw3 ай бұрын
Acha😂
@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r3 ай бұрын
iit kanpur and kharag pur vs iit madras
@saketsingh9653 ай бұрын
Control to Govt. hi kartii hai na 🤡
@rasmitarout2863 ай бұрын
no reneet
@Pdutta353 ай бұрын
I would really urge the NTA and ministry of education to file a defamation suit against you and all other KZbinrs for spreading fake information and creating havoc
@gyaaniakshat3 ай бұрын
True. I would urge them too
@IndRB73 ай бұрын
selfishness at its peak.
@gyaaniakshat3 ай бұрын
@@IndRB7 what about your selfishness
@Pdutta353 ай бұрын
@@IndRB7 don't moral police us you second chancers are nowhere ideal. Bring valid proofs from trustworthy authorities not some random interview on a random KZbin channel which holds no accountability before court.
@Nyebyo23323 ай бұрын
Dude if you look at the no candidates thats only rank suppose around 650-720 20000 students were there so the rank of the student getting 650 is 20000
@arijitmondal33283 ай бұрын
6 students from same centre ki bat kiu ho rhi hain ? Re examination ke bad to wo students to list se bahar ho gaye
@baiqmu093 ай бұрын
Hame maaf krdo.... Please khtm kro yeh sab. Har din yeh sab bakwass. Nahi chaheye koi reneet Hame, Hame sukoon chaheye.... Woh dilwah do meherbani #noreneet
@sudhirrathore36133 ай бұрын
Pdf reh achha score lakke bhi 3rd class college me
@Sazid-j5q3 ай бұрын
yes 😔
@gyaaniakshat3 ай бұрын
@@sudhirrathore3613ha padh lenge kyuki mbbs khatam karvane mein college se jyaada bachhon ka haath hota hai
@fructose123 ай бұрын
yeh log genuine students ka dimaag kharab karke chorenge, kya pagalpanti hai sablog corrupt hai bas ye reneet wale sahi hai 🤡🤡🤡
@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r3 ай бұрын
@@fructose12 laevorotatory ulti soch
@sidhartha_maji3 ай бұрын
You are just providing tweets of some random ... unapproved TWEETER handles... shame on you.. please verify each....
@souravgorai33453 ай бұрын
Don't spread the fake news just for getting views!!!
@695833 ай бұрын
please analyze the graph properly this graph doesn't show rank but the students between specific range 😂
@sidharth-mx2lf3 ай бұрын
it's Students vs Marks graph and not Rank vs Marks...& who is she to question IIT Madras..😂
@fine18953 ай бұрын
Syllabus is reduced, syllabus was changed , something was removed and something was added 😢
@wise-ee3 ай бұрын
first of all those 6 topprs from same centre are now no more toppr because their grace marks have been removed and 5 of them have attempted retest ...... secondly if there's a issue regarding rank inflation then lets be clear here that some factors are there which will never show a similarity between year to year curves of rank inflation...........1) the syllabus was reduced lets say 20 -25 ...(2) there is a huge boom in online education from 2023 onward which is easily reflected in last years cutoff also...(3) the students freshly appearing are more or less not from the covid batch means improved first and second year concepts ...(4) increasing aspirants (5) remote areas and rural areas are now exposed to higher education bcoz of pw unacademy and other online classes ....pw with almost 5-10 lakh students alone studying for neet ...how will you expect the same curves after all this... plz explain if needed
@Mons-q5f3 ай бұрын
All points are useless except syllabus reduction but also the question level was similar to previous year.
@venust283 ай бұрын
Exactly , people are just straight up ignoring the increasing competition and trying to blame everything on leak. They are not seeing there is also 3 percentile increase in jee mains cutoff which is equivalent to 20k ranks approx.
@AjitJanke3 ай бұрын
@@venust28 they are studying from pw last 3 years 😂😂😂😂
@venust283 ай бұрын
@@AjitJanke try to understand the effect of COVID. I don't know about you but my 11th 12th was during COVID times and it affected me. I needed to take drops to reach where I am now. And also online was a new concept and people needed time to get used to it. Now people are comfortable with it . And thus you see the results.
@simranparween82973 ай бұрын
Upar se pura paper match the column type k qs se bhara tha 40+ ,jo ki thoda soch k option eliminate kar k solve kar sakte Hain, 2022 me board exam late se hua tha,neet ka exam July me hua tha, jo students us year drop kiye neet 2023 k liye unhe 9 months ka time mila, lekin neet 2024 k liye pura 1 year mila wo bhi reduced syllabus Inflation to hona hi tha
@CR-jo1sx3 ай бұрын
Every one wants to be famous now😂😂
@ksunildrdo3 ай бұрын
Syllabus is not adhered and many questions came out of Syllabus. Questions in T3 Booklet came out of Syllabus sir. In Physics, as per new syllabus mentioned, 4 Questions came out of Syllabus. They are question number 10, 14, 21 and 23. In Botany Question 137 and in Zoology Question number 194. Why deleted questions were asked in Question Paper?
@apseeiitm3 ай бұрын
Ab ye neet , IITs me ladayi karwa kar manegi 😂
@pratyushmishra28503 ай бұрын
Sir 6 students getting 720 from one centre issue was because of grace marks....and that has been already resolved by a retest...now those 6 students have noy secured 720
@anilachintabathina22453 ай бұрын
IIT Madas Bell mouth analysis is waste report
@ksunildrdo3 ай бұрын
Where can we get IIT report on NEET? I am not finding on Internet. Please sahare.
@mayankkashyap6193 ай бұрын
Omg😂😂IIT is an institute not an university..😂😂
@apseeiitm3 ай бұрын
It is certainly more reliable than universities in India ... Btw IITs are deemed to be universities and can make their own courses for higher education in India be in engineering, humanities science or arts
@josephantonybrittoa23183 ай бұрын
@@apseeiitmIIT Chennai misleading SC so IIT Chennai must be questioned by Supreme court
@anikanikanikanikanikanikan16723 ай бұрын
Release data on public
@sandeepkumargupta9213 ай бұрын
Then please share this to main media and centre
@DarshanKutagulla3 ай бұрын
With due respect sir, how about the retakers percentage which would have elevated the marks/rank inflation? We are not seeing the statistics from NTA that there are so many retakers this year at each center and are these the students who have scored well?
@India_bharat_6783 ай бұрын
Uneducated professor... don't even know that those 6 toppers form one center is no more valid...but came here just to get publicity Shayad budhape mein dimag satak gaya hai so please go and have an appointment of a psychiatrist No reneet ❤❤
@S-M-B3 ай бұрын
Inki amaa ka graph 📈
@EssKay70233 ай бұрын
Ye kaise professor ban gya ise yetak toh pata nhi chala ki graph students vs marks bta rha not rank vs marks 🤦🏻
@SumitThakur-vk5mp3 ай бұрын
Unfortunately gut feelings cannot prove mass ppr leak in supreme court 😂
@Abutani-q2e3 ай бұрын
They have to pay heavy consequences for the misdeeds .
@mahmudulhasanlaskar52003 ай бұрын
Plzzzz Send this informative vdo to reneet supporting advocate of supreme Court or else to alakh sir bcz what iit professor and adv. Tweets have some sense to clarify iit madras data analysis. Bcz most of them r merged with nta's dirty game
@anitakushwah61583 ай бұрын
भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान दिल्ली (आईआईटी-डी) के एक विशेषज्ञ ने राष्ट्रीय पात्रता सह प्रवेश परीक्षा (नीट-यूजी) 2024 पेपर लीक मुद्दे पर राष्ट्रीय परीक्षण एजेंसी (एनटीए) के कहने पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट को सौंपी गई आईआईटी-मद्रास की रिपोर्ट में खामियां निकाली हैं, जिसमें दावा किया गया है कि परीक्षा में बैठने वाले 23 लाख छात्रों के लिए अंक और रैंक वितरित करने के तरीके में “कोई असामान्यता” नहीं थी। Suorce-The Hindu
@OmkarGarje-rq8rb3 ай бұрын
Misleading video😂😂😂😂😂
@AnanyaSahoo-u7x3 ай бұрын
Some tweets are fake....they understood the graph wrong
@Shekhar-su9dn3 ай бұрын
INFLATION IS 4 TO 5 TIMES AT EVERY LEVEL...
@rekhadevi46343 ай бұрын
Meanwhile before 18th we will make ready of the data,it would be great to avoid judgement postpone
@kamalkiku3 ай бұрын
Sir, you are right. I too feel the same.
@brijeshbhatt64003 ай бұрын
Stop misleading people with the wrong interpretation. Just study the graph carefully.
@baiqmu093 ай бұрын
Yeh media wale toh sirf apni trp badhane Mai lage hain. Inko news tadka chaheye woh b Hame stress de k
@Devraj-xx7ew3 ай бұрын
Might be professor's grandson scored 600😅
@EduIndia-k9u3 ай бұрын
Fake u it's a fake😂😂😂😂
@LabakishorRajkumar3 ай бұрын
Enough is enough
@babuavnish54563 ай бұрын
This video says that who are in the group of corruption.
@josephantonybrittoa23183 ай бұрын
If SC says no RE NEET then there will not be any fair and transparent exams in future everyone will quote SC order
@rojeramom71983 ай бұрын
Gut feeling of ex professor . He doesn't have any proof
@HimanshiYadav-ds5yr3 ай бұрын
Pahle graph padhna seekh lijiye fir apni trp badhaen Jhoothi report mat publish kiya kare
@Nidhsinksh3 ай бұрын
The 6 toppers from the same centres are not topper anymore.. they got 720 due to grace marks... Dr. Dheeraj please don't spread any fake news 📰....
@shivamkumar-jt1zs3 ай бұрын
Jis kisi ke pass harsh dubey bhai ka no. Ho uspe ye video share kr doo bahut tagda prooff hai reneet ke favour me.. ❤❤❤❤❤
@user-cw5tm6qd5q3 ай бұрын
Why do you want to mask up? From NTA and Dharmendra Pradhan perhaps! More logical.
@kaladevi15753 ай бұрын
Money changes everything😹
@UnemployedCrafter3 ай бұрын
And it's rank not no of students . Plz rectify it or delete this video .u r just spreading rumours . What will happen judge will decide ! Don't worry
@aarush10023 ай бұрын
Please share this video to lawyers representing students in Supreme Court they will put forward a hard argument towards CJI..
@sakir67743 ай бұрын
Why are you spreading false news
@bprem70943 ай бұрын
Report this channel for fake news
@kishorekumar-re7tt3 ай бұрын
Yup.. students started studying hard and work jee also has increased the percentile than 2023.. please check Jee mains and advance by these professors then talk about NEET ..CBI had also given clean..
@Sbtakj3 ай бұрын
But still previous year they had 43 toppers....this year it can be justified but in neet it's not the same case
@fizakhan42523 ай бұрын
Exactly
@fizakhan42523 ай бұрын
@Sbtakjexactly
@ashish_MBBS3 ай бұрын
So same inflation should happen at each level of percentile if the paper was easy why there is so much inflation in the higher mark range and less in the lower mark range ?? Exactly opposite of what is normal??
@wise-ee3 ай бұрын
@@Sbtakj of all those 6 topprs from same centre are now no more toppr because their grace marks have been removed and 5 of them have attempted retest ...... secondly if there's a issue regarding rank inflation then lets be clear here that some factors are there which will never show a similarity between year to year curves of rank inflation...........1) the syllabus was reduced lets say 20 -25 ...(2) there is a huge boom in online education from 2023 onward which is easily reflected in last years cutoff also...(3) the students freshly appearing are more or less not from the covid batch means improved first and second year concepts ...(4) increasing aspirants (5) remote areas and rural areas are now exposed to higher education bcoz of pw unacademy and other online classes ....pw with almost 5-10 lakh students alone studying for neet ...how will you expect the same curves after all this... plz explain if needed
@AnjaliVerma-e9z3 ай бұрын
Kya hai yarr hum ko ye db nahi chahiye tha hum logo ko bs ek government medical seat chahiye tha stop all this rubbish don't make our emotions matter of fight all are fighting to be popular jaldi se decision aaye we can't handle it longer 😢
@AnjaliVerma-e9z3 ай бұрын
Wanna accept it and move forward whatever decision is taken by SC
@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r3 ай бұрын
noreneet ka agya hai likh ke lele agar hua to nanga chakkar lagaunga pure delhi ka
@Harsh.S.A.H.3 ай бұрын
6 ppl thing is related to grace marks plzz.....don't retell old stories
@tokerlinkhonglah75743 ай бұрын
If reneet, ministers and bureaucrats will have to refund the parents 🤣
@TanishkaDances013 ай бұрын
Ab kya hoga re ?
@nagraj13733 ай бұрын
IIT should compare from450 to 720 comparison hike.False report supporting NTA and BJP
@h_himmler3 ай бұрын
All the hype for a course [mbbs] that produces drs with poverty! Useless course 😮
@radhalakshmi30403 ай бұрын
Re neet for all
@sagarmendirattasagar50803 ай бұрын
FAIR RE NEET MUST TO CLOSE ALL DISPUTED CHAPTERS AND DISCUSSIONS
@ArbazMaster3 ай бұрын
Fake news channel Please report for fake info and misguiding students
@namratarajak3693 ай бұрын
Please raise voice for re neet
@asherdayne61573 ай бұрын
tell him to debunk cbi reporr
@arijitmondal33283 ай бұрын
Didi english bahut accha bol ti hain .cbsc wali hain
@UnemployedCrafter3 ай бұрын
Mrittika ji plz don't spread fake news . I know u r KZbinr . U don't know much about NEET and HOW analytics work . I know u r here for million views . But plz don't do anything just for some money . If you don't know plz be quiet.
@sagarmendirattasagar50803 ай бұрын
great
@shubhamyadav-sy6vy3 ай бұрын
pls share with alakh sir
@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r3 ай бұрын
that man is cheap bastard atleast would have provided financial help
@baiqmu093 ай бұрын
Agr itne hamdard hain toh Jo itne rape, drugs, etc k cases hain unhe discuss kro ... They are just hypocrite
@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r3 ай бұрын
repes are womaens fault wera proper cloaths
@baiqmu093 ай бұрын
@@HIMANSHUGupta-x9t9r and what about those small girls who are not even reached to their puberty age are being raped?
@pratimak22233 ай бұрын
#reneet for all
@soumyadeeproy14973 ай бұрын
Disliked👍
@mohanlalchoudhary18663 ай бұрын
Publish complete result of all neet 2024 aspirants in public domain
@FaizKMR3 ай бұрын
Gmc udhampur cutoff
@Crick.light.3 ай бұрын
# reneet
@OtherS-dv3ex3 ай бұрын
Reneet is only solution ✅✅✅✅
@sunilj18663 ай бұрын
RE NEET IS ESSENTIAL
@AmitMallick-yg6wl3 ай бұрын
RENEET
@devanshagrawal34493 ай бұрын
Re neet 2024
@Panda-jq1su3 ай бұрын
☕
@Harsh.S.A.H.3 ай бұрын
Fake
@Amit-m7y2j3 ай бұрын
Spreading fake news
@ankitsharma16353 ай бұрын
#RENEET HOKAR RAHEGA
@Mlk8773 ай бұрын
Sir kya bakwas kr rhy hoo
@048khatijatulkubra33 ай бұрын
Re neet
@kishantiwari97653 ай бұрын
Bs yhi chahiye tha ...ki koi is IIT Madras ke farzi data ko bhi claim kr de ...thank you sir 🙏