17 MARK Differentiation Question | A Level Maths

  Рет қаралды 3,212

Neil Does Maths

Neil Does Maths

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 14
@ib9rt
@ib9rt 6 күн бұрын
So, for part (c), one can disregard the partial fractions bit in (b), and directly integrate dV/dt = − kV to get V/V0 = exp[ −k(t−t0) ], and then substitute for V in terms of h at the end, where h0 = 5 and t0 = 0: [ ⅓πh²(15−h) ] / [ ⅓π5²(15−5) ] = exp(−kt). The ⅓π cancels and this directly gives the result requested. Would this be accepted to get the marks, where you take the "smart" option and disregard the suggested path? (In earlier years, exam papers would have the text "using this result or otherwise, show that...". I notice recent papers do not seem to include such text.)
@loredfolk1069
@loredfolk1069 6 күн бұрын
bro why are you back here yapping
@farhanshaqib8746
@farhanshaqib8746 6 күн бұрын
Shush
@Endermanv-ot2if
@Endermanv-ot2if 5 күн бұрын
yh you are smater than the wasteman examiner so it will work ez
@amritlohia8240
@amritlohia8240 4 күн бұрын
Yes, this would be accepted. Only if it says "hence", "deduce that", or "using ..." (or similar wording) do you have to use previous results - otherwise, you're free to use any valid approach.
@ib9rt
@ib9rt 3 күн бұрын
@@amritlohia8240 Thanks for the reply.
@Jamesdavey358
@Jamesdavey358 6 күн бұрын
4:55 no K would be 3 time smaller right?
@blackaipha3541
@blackaipha3541 4 күн бұрын
No theirs would be 3 times smaller not his
@uhcyo
@uhcyo 6 күн бұрын
bro did not cut the bit
@chronos2262
@chronos2262 5 күн бұрын
I don't understand what he meant when he said, "h-15 = 0," then implied that on the numerator, and made h = 0 in the denominator. Can someone explain?
@amritlohia8240
@amritlohia8240 4 күн бұрын
If you're talking about 8:08 onwards, it's a technique called the "cover-up rule" - you can just Google it and you'll see many explanations of it.
@nighthaunter5615
@nighthaunter5615 3 күн бұрын
cover up method of doing partial fraction decomposition. its just a simplified way of looking at a pretty normal way of solving for the constants in the numerator (you multiply by the terms of the denominator on both sides of the equation, select values for the unknown variable which would make a particular constant=0). you can work out the math for yourself by solving it algebraically, you'll find the method is doingn exactly that blackpenredpen has a nice video on the cover up method for partial fraction decomposition
@OsmanHamza126
@OsmanHamza126 6 күн бұрын
easy peasy squeeze the 🍋
NeilDoesMaths Soundboard 2024
0:34
Neil Does Maths
Рет қаралды 857
HARDEST EVER Proof By Contradiction Question | A Level Maths
9:50
Neil Does Maths
Рет қаралды 6 М.
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН
Леон киллер и Оля Полякова 😹
00:42
Канал Смеха
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
The evil clown plays a prank on the angel
00:39
超人夫妇
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
2/7x + x/2 = ? This Algebra Problem HAS a GREAT SHORT CUT!
14:16
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 8 М.
88% of GCSE Students Skipped This Question | GCSE Maths
9:02
Neil Does Maths
Рет қаралды 2,1 М.
2024's Biggest Breakthroughs in Math
15:13
Quanta Magazine
Рет қаралды 553 М.
Can you crack this beautiful equation? - University exam question
18:39
What is the intersection of all open intervals containing [0,1]?
22:55
INSANE 15 MARK Differential Equations Question | A Level Maths
14:37
Neil Does Maths
Рет қаралды 23 М.
DID I FAIL ANY MODULES AT UNIVERSITY?
17:50
Neil Does Maths
Рет қаралды 13 М.
The HARDEST EVER de Moivre's Theorem Question | A Level Further Maths
20:07
TRICKEST Simultaneous Question Ever | GCSE MATHS
7:44
Neil Does Maths
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН