How can you quantify the damages to her image? She had none before this? She didn't even held a job for more than 2 weeks. She is living on benefits. Now the stalker is the victim? I want to stop the planet and leave.....mind blowing!
@bellaleenat60966 ай бұрын
Completely agree. All backwards and bonkers! What dreadful ways she made people feel😡
@theambivalentps2bloke606 ай бұрын
Richard Gadd was broke & fairly unknown before he gained money / fame from lies presented as truth about her. Not hiding her identity properly also makes this case against him very strong. You may not like her but Gadd did wrong here regardless.
@paulahanro17606 ай бұрын
@@theambivalentps2bloke60is not about liking her or not. It's about demonstrating damages. She has no job/ never kept one for long, so no damages to her professional image. She has no income, so no loss of it either. We are talking from a legal stand point. Not to mention what she did to Laura Wray and her family! Let's not pretend this woman is a saint and a victim. At least Gadd worked hard to create the show, Harvey is just trying to get a big payout. She didn't sue Gadd, she sued Netflix because that's where the big cash is.
@kazabushy6 ай бұрын
@@paulahanro1760👏 Thank you. You saved me from writing logical common sense!!
@theambivalentps2bloke606 ай бұрын
@paulahanro1760 Her case is for deformation, negligence & privacy violations, these cases are taken very seriously in the US. Gadd & Netflix made millions from a misleading show that was ficionalised & presented as a true story. They failed to protect her identity & as a result she was harassed by thousands of people / had numerous death threats etc. If you think there isn't strong case here that could see a large pay out then you're mistaken. Likelihood is Netflix will try to settle & Harvey will receive a considerable sum.
@DrLauraRPalmer6 ай бұрын
She should automatically be DENIED ANY ABILITY TO SUE if she’s been proven of stalking or restraining orders due to stalking.
@WhiteHairRules-cu6yr6 ай бұрын
Let her get the money, and counter sue her for harassment, emotional distress, physical and mental abuse. There seems to be many victims to her ways, they will leave her bone dry, so she can go back to the rat hole she belongs This case is her way of taking power over the narrative and gaslight her victims. She should not be allowed to monetize over the trauma she caused.
@annabahatska14336 ай бұрын
One hundred percent!
@whadis4046 ай бұрын
She’s definitely a stalker just not a convicted one … If only Laura Wray had pressed charges!
@gilliandawson65676 ай бұрын
Laura did hint that she would sue Fiona if she wins against Netflix. She hadn't before because Fiona had no money.
@theambivalentps2bloke606 ай бұрын
@@gilliandawson6567 if she's only after money then it doesn't look good, she should have reported her to police at the time so Fiona would face justice. If there wasn't enough of case for her to be charged back then she won't need to worry about a lawsuit from Laura now.
@gilliandawson65676 ай бұрын
@@theambivalentps2bloke60 she did go to the police but the laws at the time were very lax. She got a restraining order which helped but the police only did something if you were physically harmed. Ignored the daily stress & fear etc. Even now, sadly, we hear cases where someone is murdered by stalker where the police knew about the stalking and did nothing.
@kazabushy6 ай бұрын
Well, Heather Burns allegedly read her personal history whilst working as a temp in a mental institution. Apparently Fiona did have a conviction regarding harassment many years before.
@stephaniewhite95266 ай бұрын
What's happening here is that Baby Reindeer is proving a gigantic financial success and everyone now wants a slice of the cake !!
@dianecameron1376 ай бұрын
netflix did not name her in the programme neither did the man that it was about she is the one that came forward
@KatieJauncey6 ай бұрын
Fans of the show criss referenced the tweets on the show with real tweets. She was already outed before she came forward herself.
@heyjude50276 ай бұрын
the fan who revealed her should get a case😅
@whatiwasgoingtosay6 ай бұрын
I don’t want Netflix to settle, not even for $1. It’s a matter of principle.
@jamescontactyelena6 ай бұрын
Law does not care what you want
@theresasarjeant76736 ай бұрын
I don’t think they will settle - the whole saga is getting loads of attention. Also they can probably show that Harvey has a conviction. Google Heather Burns and Rob McDowall.
@glassonion54746 ай бұрын
@@theresasarjeant7673 Why?
@theresasarjeant76736 ай бұрын
@@glassonion5474why what?
@glassonion54746 ай бұрын
@@theresasarjeant7673 WHY do people need to look up Heather Burns and Rob Macdowell ofcourse.
@iLoveBoysandBerries6 ай бұрын
She has no case. I guarantee you they will find out she has indeed been prosecuted. She's a psychopath
@LyndaHill6 ай бұрын
Yep.
@amandaward64556 ай бұрын
She's complaining about all the attention she got when people realised who she was after the series came out so why make herself even more visable by going on Piers Morgan tv program.
@purpleroom1016 ай бұрын
Because she's a narc, craves attention and is jealous that Richard Gaad is successfully making a lot of money.
@purpleroom1016 ай бұрын
@amandaward6455 I don't believe she got any attention at all. The only attention she she garnered was from her Piers Morgan interview. The only one interview she ever did! She even asked producers to be on his program. She was not invited. She was not known at all.
@leestanyer73006 ай бұрын
Id say there will be alot of evidence in the emails that might prove the case It feels the victims are being punnished twice for telling there story
@RichardChandler-v8i6 ай бұрын
Why should a woman that is proven as a stalker and that is guilty of the crime win millions of Dollars...... That sends the wrong message to all crazy women like her.......
@Arrouba1236 ай бұрын
She’s not guilty of the crime, though
@ThylakoidsRGo6 ай бұрын
She's never legally been convicted of anything, that is her point. She still a psycho though of course 😂
@susandurrant63576 ай бұрын
It's the law. Law must rule, without it we are doomed. The irony will be she will win money but will lose absolutely everything else, very quickly
@wearequickflix6 ай бұрын
She is not a stalker. You can easily prove Laura to be a liar if you know where to look.
@whatiwasgoingtosay6 ай бұрын
Even worse, what message does it send to victims? Tell your story and risk your stalker/abuser getting a load of money, even if you never say their names.
@glassonion54746 ай бұрын
She's probably busy using a public computer right now writing fake, nasty, harassing, death threatening emails to herself to print out and use as evidence she is being stalked and deserves monetary compensation!!
@heikikawaii17996 ай бұрын
The whole entire series is false . Reindeer is the real stalker and a liar.
@glassonion54746 ай бұрын
@@heikikawaii1799 Ok Fiona.
@heikikawaii17996 ай бұрын
@@glassonion5474 knew someone would called me that. I don’t mind I’d love to be names after the rich and wealthy .
@glassonion54746 ай бұрын
@@heikikawaii1799 Good luck with your harrassment Fiona.
@phillipchadwick82696 ай бұрын
Misspelled named as names! Was that sent from ' My iPjone'?
@sunnyscott48766 ай бұрын
When will this end?? We have such a short attention span, and this has been going on forever now. Interesting that it has held up for so long.
@lamontt8086 ай бұрын
Plot twist: she not the REAL Martha
@kittymax26166 ай бұрын
I don’t believe she will get a penny
@WillowB-dn6if5 ай бұрын
DO NOT SETTLE NETFLIX
@lucyjaneashton7276 ай бұрын
Why does it really matter if they've said she was convicted, she still stalked and harassed people. Its worse that she wasn't convicted, there were no consequences at all.
@dbgoestotheinternet76096 ай бұрын
It matters because if she was convicted of a criminal act or acts, she can legally be referred to as a criminal. A person who has not been tried and convicted in a court of law is entitled to their presumed good name and cannot be legally be referred to as a criminal.
@lucyjaneashton7276 ай бұрын
She is still in a criminal to me, the laws around stalking are diabolical, that's the only reason she wasn't convicted imo@@dbgoestotheinternet7609
@shellbacksclub6 ай бұрын
It didn't say BASED on a true story. It said THIS IS A TRUE STORY!
@Garh1466 ай бұрын
Good on her, Netflix screwed up, she was so identifiable & Netflix said she was a convicted of her crimes and she wasn’t!
@LyndaHill6 ай бұрын
Keywords from your comment: "Her crimes". Yep her crimes. and there's way more than portrayed on the series, as we're seeing with people speaking out about what she's done to them.
@ElanaVital836 ай бұрын
Just because she wasn't convicted doesn't mean she didn't deserve to be
@carolinelalam75426 ай бұрын
Listen to the other interview piers Morgan did on the lawyer she harassed, she clearly is batshit crazy
@kazabushy6 ай бұрын
She will have to PROVE she is the Martha character first! Only then can she take issue with a Netflix created (we don't know that for sure) conviction at the end of their "story".
@kazabushy6 ай бұрын
@@fascinating666 Delicious, absolutely. But I've never seen it. I don't have Netflix. I know enough from KZbin though about the series. I don't know American law. I have read that the character Donny typed "This is a True story" at the beginning. Plus there is a disclaimer at the end. So a character writing 'this is a true story' means it's the characters version. So I honestly think Netflix have covered all their tittles.
@ruthcollins28416 ай бұрын
Who gives a shyte?🤦♀️👎
@lisasim6 ай бұрын
They're not even saying BASED on a true story. They wrote something like "This is a true story", which is not a 100% true. She denied being convicted and going to jail. She also denied attacking him at the bar and near the bridge and if she's right, they will pay a lot of money.
@lousywalker34976 ай бұрын
Make her a millionaire xx please so she can go away on an isle far away