Thanks very much for taking the time to show us this. 🙌👍
@DesktopMakesАй бұрын
You're welcome!
@gyorgybalassy24 күн бұрын
Great video, thanks for sharing! This tool is even more useful when the revolve axis is not centered. Adding tolerance between the two bodies is another interesting scenario.
@h4z4rd42Ай бұрын
That small detail you've mentioned at the end is crucial, as revolving a sketch placed on the X-Z plane and revolving an object around the Z axis which has parts offset from the X-Z plane obviously won't give the same result. Thank you for your efforts.
@billstrahan4791Ай бұрын
I don't think the revolved body from the sketch actually creates the same shape. The distance of the furthest edges of your key is a diagonal distance created from the original extrude, so the swept diameter of that extruded body will be a larger diameter than the diameter of the original sketch. the point remains that it is a pain to do all that and the new feature is a great thing, I just wanted to point out the results are not identical in this case. The revolved sketch approach doesnt' create a body that is equivalent to rotating the body. I see now (after watching the rest) that you noticed it creates a different profile for the reasons I stated, but I do think it's important to realize that the two approaches have different outcomes.
@DesktopMakesАй бұрын
Hi Bill, take a look at 10:14 where I talk about this. Notice that the projected sketch goes wider than the edge of the model to account for the rotation.
@billstrahan4791Ай бұрын
@@DesktopMakes Yep, that's what I was referring to when I said that you mention it later in the video. I had replied before I got to that point, so went back and edited my comment.
@tgs1766Ай бұрын
As a general rule, it’s probably best to watch the entire video before leaving a comment.
@billstrahan4791Ай бұрын
@@tgs1766 Man, I totally agree. I don't think it was totally clear that the two methods deliver different results, which was what I pointed out. I know the larger profile is pointed out later in the video, but it isn't totally clear at that point this means the first method produces a different results. Regardless, I subscribe to the channel and enjoy the content. My aim wasn't to nitpick, it was more to make sure that someone who didn't follow very closely understood that they were different outcomes.
@RandomSmith29 күн бұрын
@@tgs1766 agreed, but the two methods do not yield the same shape, unless with hindsight (10:25), he could have gone back and would have had to take the center line to the outer corners of each of the 3 horizontal blocks plus one from the centre to the corner of the centre column (pythagoras, so not immediately obvious to everyone) which is a fair amount of work that this tool solves.
@CraigHollabaugh29 күн бұрын
Thanks
@miketkappАй бұрын
Great explanation!!!!
@DesktopMakesАй бұрын
Thanks Mike!
@stephengittins6116Ай бұрын
Great video. 🙂
@DesktopMakesАй бұрын
Thanks Stephen!
@lindseyjohnson1130Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video and explanation. When creating your key, why the multiple sketches? I like short timelines. I get it if they were complex step. Just my two cents.
@DesktopMakesАй бұрын
They key was made with only two sketches. The second sketch was needed because it was on a different plane. The only way to keep them on the same sketch would be to enable 3D sketching.
@DesktopMakesАй бұрын
Gave this another thought and I could have created the entire key in one sketch. The second extrusion would simply be from the center plane instead of the front face of the key.
@lindseyjohnson113028 күн бұрын
Thanks for the reply. I continue to challenge myself in keeping my timeline as short as possible.
@gorgonbertАй бұрын
Thanks 🙏
@garagemonkeysanАй бұрын
Nice video. Mahalo for sharing! : )
@Blackspire_Cosplay22 күн бұрын
thank you for the video this was very informative. one question i did have and this might be silly or better know to the 360 community but how did you get the graphing lines to disappear and reappear as you need them?