WALKSNAIL is doing things that DJI won't do. I'm loving the new WS. I have a feeling there innovating much more in the future
@fguenther293 сағат бұрын
well, now dji also sells some cheap goggles, just wondering if i should get this instead for beginner fpv flights
@MCsCreations3 ай бұрын
Awesome review, Lee! Thanks!!! 😃 My only issue are the antennas... The fact you can't change them is kind of a deal breaker for me... 😕 But I like what they're doing! Kudos, Caddx!!! Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@Chris_Paul13 ай бұрын
Nice product. Any idea of the FOV ?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
About the same as the other goggles from trying them here.... Happy flying
@automaton4503 ай бұрын
That is my number concern with these, and Caddx does not specify it. But I have found published FOV numbers to be worthless in actual comparisons. My Headplay HD with RHO-Lens HPRO lenses is supposed to be 57°, my Goggles X is supposed to be 50°, yet the X looks half the Headplay size. My Recon HD is supposed to be 44°, yet looks 1/3 the Headplay size. The Recon originally specified a 4.5 or 5” screen, then 4, and last 3.5”, and given how much black space is around the tiny screen, it does look like it was designed for a larger panel. Was hoping the Goggles L had a larger view than the Goggles X, I guess most want a screen they can see all at once without moving their eyes much, I prefer the IMAX experience!
@helidude713 ай бұрын
Awesome! I'll order one. This is also the only option to fly FPV if you are slightly cross eyed.
@thirtythreeeyes86243 ай бұрын
You can't adjust the ipd and focal distance to work on fatshark style goggles?
@nikotttin3 ай бұрын
Are you sure? I need a prism in my glasses to not go crossed eye. Here, since I cannot wear my glasses, I would need that prism to be either adapter on the adapter or on contact lenses, which means hard lenses. On my HDZ goggles, I can adjust the focus, but that does not correct for the crossed-eye issue... To-date the dji v1 are the most comfortable screens, because they're a but further away vs. other goggles.
@OneTwo-wt8qv3 ай бұрын
My Quanum Headtracker goggle is a bit long in the tooth .. Love my smaller Eachine EV800 goggle .. TIME TO GO HD .. cheers !
@alexislechevalier10223 ай бұрын
I'm wearing glasses and I'm so sad I can't wear contact lenses (eyes too dry). The devices for jumping into the digital HD world, with glasses compatibility, are so rare and expensive... This unit is interesting indeed... Thanks for the review.
@terminsane3 ай бұрын
My glasses fit into the cobraX and dji v2 goggles. Haven't tried these walksnails yet
@terminsane3 ай бұрын
You can get 'diopters' / lenses that attach to the goggle. You can buy premade ones close to your prescription, or any eyeglass store can make them in your prescription. But I find my glasses fit most goggles except the small skyzones
@tubamanandy23 ай бұрын
@@terminsane Diopters for this box-style goggle ??
@terminsane3 ай бұрын
@@tubamanandy2 good question. Looks like there is mounting for it. If you make a 3d print you can give it to the eyeglasses place and they'll cut the lenses to your 3d print
@DS-ye7mz3 ай бұрын
I wear glasses with thin legs with my fatshark Recon HD and skyzone cobra X without problem. Just a bit more light passes threw the holes of the legs.
@douglasyoung39923 ай бұрын
Lee, thanks for fpv help yet again and have a good day.
@MrMartinRome3 ай бұрын
Hi Lee, I think the Fat Shark Dominator HDs are currently the best value. I love mine. These would be a nonstarter for me without any way to focus. Also, many other ways to add headtracking. Of course, still a nice entry-level choice. Nice to see Walksnail continuing to invest in the hobby.
@biglizardmedia3 ай бұрын
Box goggles don’t need focus adjustment. Every box goggle is ever used were always perfect for focus
@MrMartinRome3 ай бұрын
@@biglizardmedia Not perfect if you need glasses and don't use contacts
@gadgetmerc3 ай бұрын
I'm thinking these might work good for my kids. Do you think these might work for around a 5 year old?
@raeme1053 ай бұрын
Great thanks it’s just what I have been looking for as I just want something that just works so I can give fob a go on my airplane
@brightontilifly3 ай бұрын
I'm gutted as a glasses man but it's really positive and the gimble is beyond cool
@buddyadkins2432Ай бұрын
Even though this is a "Box" goggle, it still seems to have 2 viewing screens which is still a dual viewing channel situation. For me a dual viewing situation is challenging for my eyes. Plus, it does not seem to have an HDMI input. Although still pretty decent price, but think that I will wait. Between my eyeglasses and no HDMI or analog input it is still a reason to wait.
@jaysonrees7383 ай бұрын
I haven't heard much about the broadcast mode lately. Will have to see if this goggle is any good, and broadcast sharing mode is working better. If both are true, this would actually make for an excellent buddy goggle.
@gadgetmerc3 ай бұрын
I thought that already worked. I was thinking they'd be great for that too. Maybe not
@MrStevegibb3 ай бұрын
Something I may have to try out as I really cant get along with the v1 goggles I find them uncomfortably high pressure on my nose and I have to have my eyelashes touching the screen to get view of the whole screen in the smallish lenses. Also I find they V1 goggles are constantly blasting hot plastics fumes into your mouth and nose. I got the newbee drone foam but they have used a foam that's like those magic cleaning sponges and it abrades the crap out of your skin. I really do like the walksnail system but I find the V1 goggle very difficult to use for long periods and long range flying is what i think this system is really good for.
@wrightwells3 ай бұрын
I noticed you have the Walksnail patch antennas on your google X and some very nice Menace Thrashers, I know you know Grey at Menace, even his pictures show his pico patches installed on the bottom two reciever ports. Why not put the patches on the top to connect to the send and recieve port.
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
You can if you don't want the ability to fly behind at range... Happy flying
@tubamanandy23 ай бұрын
With a red led on the front you would look like a Cylon from Battlestar Gallactica :)
@arshadmohammed10723 ай бұрын
I was thinking that same thing!😂
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
This time the led is white. More Tron than Battlestar...happy flying!
@RawFreestyleFPV3 ай бұрын
Love the video, just wanted to mention, walksnail mini 1s lite is 89 bucks, still not crazy cheap, but considering you get a high quality camera and vtx, not much more than a analog camera and vtx.
@moviefalk1773 ай бұрын
How can I use the head track with my Spektrum transmitter?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
You don't need to if you're a Walksnail gimbal. Video coming soon... Best of luck
@user-wingman473 ай бұрын
FInally a price I am willing to pay. Will require the lens frame for eyesight correction but $29 is well worth it. Thanks for review.
@wasa73 ай бұрын
Would have been ideal had it fit over my glasses 😢
@Hugocraft3 ай бұрын
Is it possible to use the head tracker with a spektrum radio? Then 2nd question is what transmitter/camera combo to use with something like a parkflyer such as the hobbyzone AeroScout?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Yes, and any should work. See my builds adding Walksnail to planes... Best of luck
@OVERKILLFPV2 ай бұрын
Awesome video. I thought it came with a case.
@simoneason11523 ай бұрын
For someone with 10+ analog models, I've been using the Skyzone Cobra S box goggles for 2+ years. I want to get into digital without converting my entire fleet. Would you recommend something like this, or the Skyzone 04X Pro with a Walksnail module?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
If the HDMI input has low lag, and the screen is a nice bright OLED with a decent resolution then it should be fine. See my video on my thoughts about that in the Walksnail playlist...
@terminsane3 ай бұрын
The cobraX / cobraS have really laggy HDMI input. I have the cobraX and its noticeable. You can definitely fly it. It would be fine for wings. But quad freestyle you'll notice it for sure
@Mrfunkyfpv3 ай бұрын
That’s what I been waiting for headtracker can I ask were u get the cable
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Me too. Waiting for it on the Goggle X now... Happy flying!
@salvadorsordo50323 ай бұрын
I trust on Walksnail technology, and It is good that Walksnail has this brand new product, but I guess they should first release the so much expected Analog module for the Avatar HD Googles X. with recording capabilities :)
@johncarold3 ай бұрын
Hi Lee, Great video and review of the Caddx Walksnail googles, I love the headtracker system for flying fix-wing, Thanks Caddx for a great par of googles. Thanks Lee, for the video and info
@FPV420.3 ай бұрын
The Goggles L looks like a great solution for those who don't want to spend an arm and a leg for the Goggles X. I am a big fan of box goggles and although I have the Goggles X, I wish I could try those. My Goggles X does not allow me to see the very corner of the screen unless I don't remove the face plate completely. I ended up flying without the cushion altogether. The IPD of the X is a few mm short for me. After Walksnail released the L I know SkyZone Cobra X v2 lost the battle.
@user-bh9yk2wv4w21 күн бұрын
I have a dead pixel and the lack of focus adjustment kinda sucks
@croucht3 ай бұрын
The only thing that is strange to me is to only have a patch antenna and not add an omni, especially with the addition of head tracking that would theoretically encourage you to turn your head around which could then cause a signal break up.
@tmc-fpv3 ай бұрын
Theres X2 patches and X2 dipoles inside. The tx port is attached to the patch.
@Niloc335673 ай бұрын
What's the range on that goggles 1k please comment thanks
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Others are claiming over 15km with a 1200mW Avatar unit... Happy flying
@shaneellasdaicastrestorati3675Ай бұрын
Look nice but 380 in Australia
@Bill-NM3 ай бұрын
So Lee - since eyeglasses don't fit, and there is no focus, (and there isn't a way to repalce the OEM lens with an Rx lens?), and the guess is that anyone needing a reading Rx over about 1.5-2.0, will REQUIRE "reading" contacts to use these goggles? Do reading contacts even exist? But in any case, I am typically stunned that a goggle manufacturer chooses to ELIMINATE a sizeable portion of their prospective customers by designing optics that simply will not work for people who need reading glasses - which is a lot of people. Wow. Quite dissapointing. Did I get that right? I still really can't believe it.
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
I've seen that they are planning aftermarket lenses, so if I get a set I'll show them... Stay tuned
@LWJCarroll2 ай бұрын
@@Painless360yes see Andrew Newtons review for details.
@michaelsavchenko759223 күн бұрын
Hey , I want to buy the Walksnail Goggles L, but I have one question: Is it possible to connect them to Liftoff or any other simulators? If it is possible, how can I do it? Thnak you in advance!
@Painless36023 күн бұрын
No HDMI input on them so not easily...
@michaelsavchenko759223 күн бұрын
@@Painless360 but posibel ? I am assuming I need to spilt 3.5jack to RCA connection and that to HDMI
@Painless36023 күн бұрын
I'm not aware of a way to do it. But someone usually figures a workaround eventually!
@bomberaustychunksbruv41193 ай бұрын
My Cobra X goggles were $350 AU. These are showing as $199.00. But I can't afford to change out the airside Vtx's. So I'll stay Analogue.
@CineMat_Air3 ай бұрын
If only Walksnail video quality was more friendly for videography like dji o3 camera is, I would switch overnight. Other than that I'm looking forward buying those along with few tiny whoops.
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Seen the moonlight camera? 03 alternative... Happy flying
@eddie_Za3 ай бұрын
Can it do hdmi out?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Answered in the video... Happy flying
@GR33ZY.A13 ай бұрын
Can it work with Caddx vista?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
No
@20basty3 ай бұрын
Is there a way to put extra antenna or only the build in one are usable ?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
As supplied, no extwrnal antenna connections...
@20basty3 ай бұрын
@@Painless360 damn that sucks a bit. I guess the build in patches will be connected the same way as google x antennas and one could make a hole to the plastic and lead a cable out for external bigger antenna
@tmc-fpv3 ай бұрын
@@20bastythere's 2 patches and 2 dipole omni inside. We've tested it out to 15km+ with a 1200mw vtx.
@20basty3 ай бұрын
@@tmc-fpv alright thats not too bad
@stevietee103 ай бұрын
CADDX website shows various strength eyepieces you can clip in. QUOTE "The detachable lens design supports various vision needs, allowing for the installation of nearsighted, farsighted, or blue light-blocking lenses to meet individual preferences."
@iam.miikey3 ай бұрын
Makes Fatshark recon HD’s?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Walksnail and Fatshark seem to be very different, seperate business now. I'm worried about Fatsharks future as 'their HD' offering is now it's own thing. The marketing guys at Fatshark really handled it badly.... Happy flying
@Mrfunkyfpv3 ай бұрын
What’s the FOV
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
About the same as the other goggles.... Happy flying
@ДинарМ-о5з3 ай бұрын
I think than is a bit strange, that here is only 2 directional antennas and no circular polarisation antennas.Is it really so? so I can't fly somewhere to the side or behind me Don't you know? Maybe you took them apart?
@Painless3603 ай бұрын
Yes you can, even directional antennas still recieve in all directions. Just not to the same extent as omnidirectional antennas... see my antenna lab series...
@ДинарМ-о5з3 ай бұрын
@@Painless360 yea, i know) But i meaned that it will be with not as good quality as with omnidirectional (sorry for my English, thats not my main language:)
@terminsane3 ай бұрын
A lot of LR people say not to use circular polarized antennas on digital systems. They use bardpoles and other linear antennas. Circular only helps in dense city type settings with lots of reflections & multipathing
@IanF-FPV3 ай бұрын
Just my opinion but the Goggle L looks a lot more premium and solidly designed than the Goggles X.
@TheVeganarchism3 ай бұрын
L’s bells!
@IanF-FPV3 ай бұрын
It’s incredible that this cost less than a WalkSnail vrx…🧐🧐