New World Aeternum Doesn't Want You To See This!

[@LordGank1]

The most concerning thing is Jay oddity lost his copium

[@alex1212456]

He did?

[@dangobangotango]

he actually became a villain

[@KINGxINISIDIOUS]

It’s about time! 🎉

[@Z-MACx]

@@LordGank1 don’t worry I’m here to put the team on my back

[@WorshipMMO]

@@alex1212456yeah he’s moving on to other games as a primary focus now.

[@Cascaden-i2v]

AGS want to stop getting meme'd on. But when companies make efforts to stop the memers...the memes only get stronger.

[@PassingTheDog]

Amen!

[@MarkD-pl4fu]

Not really enough player for memes. No point in memes, when only 300 people will understand those.

[@Cascaden-i2v]

@@MarkD-pl4fu Nice Meme...

[@BRADLIKESPVP]

Fixing it: 🙅‍♂ Hiding it: 👌

[@Discospawn]

It has been funny to see people defend AGS' decision to remove the possibility to track server populations, because they think that accurate information may harm the game's profitability. it's easy to understand why *employees of a company* would have that mindset, but advocating for the company as a player (rather than advocating for other players) is truly bizarre. Their logic doesn't even hold up, because those same people are quick to point to the population chart from the Open Beta champion the game's comeback; a chart that could only be created using the data that we no longer have. They aren't actually concerned about people mis-using data, they just don't like when data reflects poorly on the game.

[@sirnicholibraden86]

Couldn't agree more.

[@MrMojitoTV]

People who like the game just use the counter-argument of showing the data going back up to the haters, because the haters keep pointing out these numbers every day of these 3 years, it’s not about people mis-using data, it’s a normal way of reacting. It’s just trendy and makes you cool to say that New World is a dead game, and these numbers are an easy way to prove it, but if removing them can remove a tiny bit of toxicity from socials, then it’s a good change

[@chuckles7494]

im not surprised by amazon hiding numbers. All the big corpos hide their numbers for streaming services too, same with other game companies who have their own platforms. but i agree it's shady and gets rid of transparency, especially when the consumer wants to see if its worth getting into an MMO or not because the game population matters.

[@thezikaz]

We get our hands on those numbers regardless of if they show them or not and especially in AGS's case, transparency might actually save them from themselves.

[@stefanangheloiu272]

the dumbest comment, game population really matters, if you don't want to waste 2 hours queuing for Mutations.. etc etc

[@jamesdenny1131]

They wouldn't have done this unless the numbers were EMBARRASSINGLY low.

[@bonbarmandrink]

They are doing the same thing has blizzard did with wow a decade ago. Its to make sure people dont know for sure how many players are active, so people cant just show numbers and argue around it. For them its a win because they can lie about player numbers, for us its a loss because we are gonna get lied to. I'm used to it tho its ags and they are scummy

[@GreekWytch]

turning off the server data could be a way of helping servers preserve their populations that are experiencing depletions of populations (i.e., US West server to an US East server) during this hurry up and wait until October 15th.

[@sirnicholibraden86]

It has been funny to see people defend AGS' decision to remove the possibility to track server populations, because they think that accurate information may harm the game's profitability. it's easy to understand why employees of a company would have that mindset, but advocating for the company as a player (rather than advocating for other players) is truly bizarre. Their logic doesn't even hold up, because those same people are quick to point to the population chart from the Open Beta champion the game's comeback; a chart that could only be created using the data that we no longer have. They aren't actually concerned about people mis-using data, they just don't like when data reflects poorly on the game.

[@spiritwyrmk8622]

Aim assist and target lock are very different. We currently have an aim assist on controller. Target lock is qhat makes you follow the players around and if they're close its insane. That's what needs to be removed

[@aortenzio]

steam says 6000 players. still pretty garbage numbers.

[@MarkD-pl4fu]

Most are Bots and daily logins to do a 10 minute trade post update.

[@scarbunker]

The New World DB admin admitted that he was breaking the TOS with New World. They patched out the exploit.

[@Z-MACx]

The total server population was available and public knowledge when the Open Beta was still going

[@DukeSloth]

Only partially. Multiple regions weren't

[@gamezonereactions8388]

Cash grabbing and Copium huffing on the deck of the Titanic.

[@MegaMey1234]

I don't think this has any negative effect on the game itself.

[@legitrips]

I wanna know how nwdb even got those numbers previously becuase there's no public API and they are apparently not affiliated with AGS.

[@dotschannel4130]

This looks so fun, im going to try this out, thanks!

[@charlesm8182]

Wow stopped publishing player data after warlords expac

[@cementcarnie4490]

Duuuuke my guy, We are not worthy of your time. Love new world, spent so much time in this game, loved it, hopefully this makes it stick around??!!! Let’s hope it will Duke. Love the content! Keep it coming!!!!

[@denzoTM]

I just wish it wont be that bad because i really liked the beta and i want to experience the full game

[@mike80808]

I liked seeing the server player counts because ig helped me choose a low population server for farming materials. Less contention for resources. It just sucked with PvP hordes and bots farming mats 24x7 to get their GS up or crafting BIS. So, not sure how I feel about this going away, even thoigh6I understand why AGS did it.

[@VinJow]

Alot of compagny doing this too ! Alot of servers were full on beta tbh !

[@nune123]

I agree 100% with hiding this information. I had many friends who stopped playing simply because the number varied, from 2500 to 2000 some stopped, from 2000 to 1700 some more stopped. I think this information has a negative impact on the player base.

[@essenmaelen6798]

Yes. Every player will have a different opinion on what number is good or bad. What is important is if the game is fun or not.

[@aortenzio]

why play a dying game? you just are addicted.

[@karefool2494]

I think you’ll be able to tell quite quickly if the server is dead or not just from global chat alone 😂

[@Poggia7]

the fortnite aim assist is a different page tho: fortnite became literally unplayable with a controller, you cannot compete against m&k right now, so they are forced to improving it without breaking it - that's why they are trying to introduce a different aim asssit that doesnt' react instantly when people side step (cod should take notes here)

[@Pago88]

U always cry bc u cant compete against pc players, why the hell u wanna play against them. I dont understand this bs. It makes no sense. If u want play with your friends, just buy the f same System

[@neilm9400]

With sharding it tends to take away the concept of player count. I can just shard an area they need to. Also, i would imagine ags will provide a very busy indicator when picking a server. Since the player count is an accumulation of all shards currently active... For the "server"

[@vyniron3766]

I personally see not showing player count especially concurrent player count as a good thing. It seems people have these fear of "Playing a dead game" when in reality most games arnt actually dead and by not showing player counts I think removes that as a whole and I think alot of players have a unrealistic standard of concurrent players and it should be that huge massive number when most games just wont ever have that. We need to stop glorifying playing count as a way to decided whether a game is good or not it is a flawed, a great example of this is the people saying Palworld is a dead game because the concurrent player base fell off because everyone completed the game, Its a flawed mindset

[@JakobEslinger]

Now the game will die faster as you won't be able to find which server is the populated one

[@vyniron3766]

@@JakobEslinger you can still see In NW in the server list it was say low, med, and High pop so you can tell

[@JakobEslinger]

@@vyniron3766 so in other words you can't see the population numbers

[@vyniron3766]

@@JakobEslinger why do you have to see the numbers? it seems to me that you have this fear of playing a "dead game" so you have to follow trends other wise you cant have fun because your fun is based of the validation of others opinions of the games that you play and if people say its a "Dead game" then you cant have fun which is pretty sad, you should learn to just enjoy games for what they no matter how many people are talking about it because thats the point of games it doing what you enjoy not what other people say you should enjoy.

[@vyniron3766]

@@JakobEslinger and for the record a NW server holds 2,500 players so you can go off of that when a server says low, Med, or High.

[@dervykins]

player count matters, when you are trying to play an actual MMORPG. If its not massively multiplayer (as in has a bunch of players) then its not the game we're paying for. If you go stand in Everfall and you only see 10-15 people that's not massive. There are ingame indicators like this that prove to me the game is dead af even if they try to hide the numbers. Go check Weavers and try to find a single moving player on your server. Try to queue for arenas or anything but the most meta dungeon of the week and sit for a half hour with 0 gameplay. Cant hide the lack of content.

[@alex1212456]

We don’t need to see anything. The lock on will play the game for you

[@rythking2983]

There’s a chance that this is just an accident and ags just broke the player count 🤣

[@dsteffens]

They dont want to show low player count when it doesnt take into account console players. I totaly understand it, to many takes steam player count as a standpoint on how many players playing.

[@sirnicholibraden86]

It has been funny to see people defend AGS' decision to remove the possibility to track server populations, because they think that accurate information may harm the game's profitability. it's easy to understand why employees of a company would have that mindset, but advocating for the company as a player (rather than advocating for other players) is truly bizarre. Their logic doesn't even hold up, because those same people are quick to point to the population chart from the Open Beta champion the game's comeback; a chart that could only be created using the data that we no longer have. They aren't actually concerned about people mis-using data, they just don't like when data reflects poorly on the game.

[@MrProbstandrew]

also, when i think about the past, a few top NW employes have been made to look stupid, cuz we could see the data from the nwdb.. even just small things, like when some said how much they play, only to see they play on the deadest server f.e. we the PC community have called out to many embarrassing things from AGS over the years, or just shown their issues n stuff. i remember last year being apologies in each video from AGS.. with the promise of the future (secrets) only to find out they are now moving to and focusing on a new customer group. console kiddies will be much easier to manage. and prolly also jsut quit, when its bad, where as we PC community have been working towards getting the game we know NW could have been. imo., this oppressive aimbot and lock on, is also just one of the steps, to turn away the PC community. and protect their new customer base, from having a "bad expierence" due to more skilled PC players in pvp etc.. specially since many PC are hoping for that as one lil nice thing..ha

[@aortenzio]

HOW COULD YOU SCUKERS NOT EXPECT ANYTHING LESS FROM SCUMMY AGS????

[@loukospapazitas6728]

Duke less info is better for this kind of games.....lots of ppl ask if ppl playing and when they get Que, they goin berserk! So less info is good for NW! We are considerably better. I find OPR, farm and practically everything I need.

[@sirnicholibraden86]

It has been funny to see people defend AGS' decision to remove the possibility to track server populations, because they think that accurate information may harm the game's profitability. it's easy to understand why employees of a company would have that mindset, but advocating for the company as a player (rather than advocating for other players) is truly bizarre. Their logic doesn't even hold up, because those same people are quick to point to the population chart from the Open Beta champion the game's comeback; a chart that could only be created using the data that we no longer have. They aren't actually concerned about people mis-using data, they just don't like when data reflects poorly on the game.

[@Altarknight]

Hello, well I think your video is only about speculations not about true data😊

[@rubensantiago807]

Hey guys maybe it just doesn't matter any more because of cross server play .... \

[@JamieKeefer]

Bro, cheer up.

[@FusionThunder]

I hope the game does well and they learn from their mistakes in the past

[@oDALEo-]

Hello this is 2024, they have yet to learn a damn thing. wake up

[@Oryyyt]

​@@oDALEo-Not even an educated guess is certain. Aything can happen. I lean towards the theory that the drought was caused by the development of this new build. Bad communication is 100% on them tho.

[@LiamHYT]

If you think about it, more games should do this, THINK ABOUT IT, how many people out there check the playerbase numbers of the game they play and if they are not great or going down slightly THEY TOO QUIT THE GAME, they could have been having a decent time in a game but because they see some graphs going down they give up on the game as well.

[@apolegetics2023]

its true, downward turns so obvious make you evaluate whether you should continue to invest

[@johnweig4667]

I agree

[@MrBalrogos]

Cause if game dead no reason to play.

[@shagkie]

I want to know if a game is dead and yes that will determine if I want to continue to play.

[@ehano1159]

For free to play, maybe. But for a buy to play, its normal for consumers to want to know if the product is good or not before buying , no?

[@BONESBRUH]

I wouldnt log on until delos was over 200 pop Now i have to log, check opr queue and then leave. 😂

[@MarkD-pl4fu]

They got you! 1 more for the steam chart!

[@thezikaz]

inb4 they drop roadmap and its abysmal

[@mrmeownandez732]

This is a common thing because Sony and Microsoft don't give companies easy access to this information. Crazy you are immediately blaming new world for it. Console has never really been privy to this information because console players aren't obsessed with these numbers. Instead of embracing the new wave of popularity this game is about to have the og streamers are just trying to drag it down.

[@sirnicholibraden86]

Blame ALL COMPANIES for it. Just because someone does it worse doesn't mean we cannot criticize New World. It has been funny to see people defend AGS' decision to remove the possibility to track server populations, because they think that accurate information may harm the game's profitability. it's easy to understand why employees of a company would have that mindset, but advocating for the company as a player (rather than advocating for other players) is truly bizarre. Their logic doesn't even hold up, because those same people are quick to point to the population chart from the Open Beta champion the game's comeback; a chart that could only be created using the data that we no longer have. They aren't actually concerned about people mis-using data, they just don't like when data reflects poorly on the game.

[@mrmeownandez732]

@sirnicholibraden86 it's just crazy ubare assuming they remove it. It's on steam because steam posts the numbers. It's not not on console because Sony and Microsoft don't post the numbers. It's not some crazy conspiracy. What's crazy is you just want access to the numbers to hate watch new world lol they are going to get a metric ton of players when the game drops and it's going to dwindle over the course of the year. Like it always does. Console players do not watch these numbers. It's literally just the pc community. Console players have never once had an online outcry about not being able to see player numbers. They like a game they play it if they don't like it they don't play it.

[@Gathoderiz]

It's kinda late to attempt to hide player count, everybody knows new world is dead world Amazon games never cease to amaze us with stupid decisions

[@thezikaz]

they cashed in their covid bag on PC gamers and now they are cashing in their console bag before putting the game on life support. probably.

[@BurkenHp]

I do not mind it all, i think its better. Players have lack of understanding about peaks during content launches. And that alot of players take more seasonal approaches. As a veteran player i absolutly prefer it. Since the "x game is dead" im tired of. I feel that would be better estimated by being in the game and "feeling" if its empty However i do share your point about players not seeing how many there are on each server, for the selection. If new world implement a "High/medium/low" pop info on the server selection, that would be good enough for me

[@JakobEslinger]

Now the game just looks entirly dead lol

[@jman29x]

It was only to level 30, but i had a really fun time playing the beta.

[@cotillion]

game is being used to wring as much money out of people as it can before it dies... mreh

[@petemisc4291]

If you’re a new player, this game is well worth the money!

[@stonic5]

Just expect the devs to constant nerf what ever you spent time grinding. Expect the devs to rework skills to becpme clunky that you found fun. Expect to be told massive updates are coming only to get nothing. Expect every bug fix to add 4 new bugs for each one fixed. Expect to be forced back into the same boring pve content every few months for slight new rewards. Expecting to highly is what hurt people the most when not met in mmos. Expect the worst, and itll lead to a good time.

[@DillonMerk]

Lmao 3 servers was the equivalent of all the steam players and there was alot of full servers way more console players then pc

[@DillonMerk]

4000 ppl per server and they had to keep adding servers

[@sirnicholibraden86]

Meh, these numbers are still extremely low.

[@TelevisionWarrior]

Why do a lot of people go on such a witch hunt and dissect every little change that AGS does... I honestly feel like hiding the player count is a good thing for them. It gets people away from paying attention to how many people are on a server and instead, just playing the game if they enjoy it at the end of the day. Back in the early 2000s, no one cared about what gaming studios did. We were too busy laughing, staying up late, and just enjoying a game for what it was. I just don't get today's culture. Just my opinion though so it is what it is

[@Maczuga_]

Just watch them announce that API got 'broken' by sharding implementation and was not intended, however they cannot provide any ETAs about when and if it's going to be fixed.

[@sydefx-sin3721]

Just one last f you to the PC players... Lol jk it'll be fun and they probably just want to remove any negativity like you said.

[@SiggyTau]

They should have hid player counts long ago. Sorry but players don't need exact numbers to enjoy a game. People misinterpret numbers and try to use it as a weapon towards the devs all the time. As long as the server you play on is populated who cares what the overall player count is. People worry too much about the numbers. Just play the game and enjoy it

[@Machao2005]

Duke just cover a different game 😂

[@thenightingale7405]

So is this shifting into an anti new world channel?

[@deathcea3967]

I've been picking up on that too.

[@FreedomRoseStein]

if amazon does something anti new world it's going to be anti new world news. if they do something good for new world it will be...not anti new world news? it's an information channel, not dukes fault the information is "anti new world" lmao

[@oDALEo-]

Get a grip both of you. I would rather hear the crap than it being sugar coated by deluded YTers trying to keep their career relative. AGS drop the ball time and again yet you guys will still be there on your knees

[@thenightingale7405]

@@oDALEo- There is nothing wrong with being a negative channel. It's a great source of clicks and revenue. It's just not the type of channel I am personally interested in when it comes to gaming. I fully grasp the pros and cons of New World and I fully understand that AGS is terrible in many ways. I don't need constant videos reminding me of it.

[@r3mxd]

@@thenightingale7405do u tho? cope

[@actosh7670]

Here we go again, they once did a move like this and had to backpedal, but i think they wont this time ^^

[@rediorxd]

its so sad how you still have copium

[@essenmaelen6798]

Even though I enjoyed looking at the data, I think this is a great change.

[@JakobEslinger]

Why? What does it even change?

[@essenmaelen6798]

@@JakobEslinger I believe it is good because the number is arbitrary and unrelated to if an individual will enjoy the game or not. Rather than making a decision on whatever number a player deems "good", the player will instead make their decision on their experience with the game.

[@ArchitecTJ37]

First!!

[@delacroixii]

nah

[@Duffikus]

Removing a potential point that can lead to a death spiral is probably a good thing

[@oDALEo-]

Its been on life support for 2 years, Pull the effing plug