NHL: OT Goals Waved Off

[@IcemenMike45]

Lol at 4:05, he made sure he put that blame on the Sit-Room in Toronto on that one 😂

[@iwantlee9510]

McDavid pulled the goalies blocker and right arm away. It was interference, and a good call.

[@edschramm6757]

there was certainly contact, but i am not entirely convinced it stopped him from playing his position as goalie : he got up and somewhat reset before the rebound shot was taken. though its not a bad call, im not entirely sure what they look for for goalie interference. some i have seen i would swear are blatant are not called interference

[@kodingkrusader2765]

@@edschramm6757 basically the spirit of the rule is if theyre in the crease and theres contact it's interference. Outside the crease it really depends basicslly the goalie is given the ability to move their arms from within the crease

[@97Senator]

5:48 *FINAL (OT):* Red Wings 2, Sabres 2.

[@expxnd5167]

97Senator lol

[@shmuelosina9099]

L0L

[@johnathanpatrick6118]

If only ties still existed...😂😂

[@jeffersa2398]

lol i saw that too :D

[@tommysobo123]

I'd love to know the eventual winners of each of these games.

[@joedevil29]

I know San Jose won the game with the final clip in Double OT but that's the only one

[@waleah4855]

Oilers won that game also. Mcdavid score shootout winner and pointed at the bet like refs do when the pucks go in. The most Mcdavid was pissed in a game. He walked over to refs and said "DID THAT COUNT, GO UPSTAIRS". I THINK he got a misconduct. It was just a hype good moment for oilers and the fans.

[@PhilL30tard0]

@@waleah4855 I wish i would have seen that live.

[@thenotoriousko6872]

@@waleah4855 haha ya I remember

[@Jame5man]

Boston won in that first clip but lost the series

[@iaintnomanstealer]

Shaw goal was so clutch. Still think it should have counted.

[@5000subsnovideo]

ESPOSITO goal that goes in by the force of any body part except the stick is a no goal

[@chopshot4973]

@@5000subsnovideo So any body part

[@jackfilter702]

4:05 John Tavares is that u? Lol 😂

[@exoticcompilations6915]

That oilers goal was cleaner then Mr Cleans head

[@thespaceelefant2441]

The one against Calgary? Lmfao not a chance, that's interference all day, he literally pulled the goalie out of the way of the shooting Lane INSIDE THE CREASE. fucking oilers fans salty af. "and I don't understand that call" those announcers are clearly blind too lmao

[@krazycam1029]

Why does the ref that waved off the first goal sound like he’s 12 😂

[@GlacialLake]

He sounds like Terry Cahill from Fubar

[@pakasteallas]

0:42 when you forgot youre playing ice hockey

[@travishopkins6539]

I still think the head butt goal should be allowed

[@dphorgan]

r_TbHOP_r Awesome but no. Can't push the puck towards the net with anything but your stick.

[@rachael3533]

Then you don't know the rule. If a puck is hit with anything other than the stick intentionally the goal will be disallowed

[@travishopkins6539]

Rachael I’m completely aware of the rule and accept that goal didn’t count. What I’m saying is that I think if you CAN head the puck in the net it should count. Kicking and using your hand are different.

[@connorarsenault7769]

I've seen it before and it's counted

[@rachael3533]

Connor Arsenault no you havent

[@antoniomonteiroai]

Amazing material! Keep track of the videos, excited about taking a look at even more of those

[@walkinginthewild]

The Vegas/San Jose argument of Jones' stick being outside of the crease is so dumb imo. 1. Even if a goalie is outside of the crease, if there's intentional contact, it's still interference. 2. Where else he suppose to put his blocker? The crease is suppose to be the goalie's area, but if the blocker can't be outside of it, the goalie can't utilize the whole crease without it being out of position and then that also keeps him from doing his job properly. It's a catch-22 I guess. Anyway, rant over. Now that I got that off my chest, awesome video! Head butt goal should count

[@LiveTUNA]

I agree. Jones clearly interfered with Marchessault. If they are going "pretend" to be black and white about goalie interference, incidental or not, then they also need to protect position players from the goalies interfering with them during a play. I do get your point about goalies crossing the line, but why even have a crease if it only goes one way? Honestly that call should have never ever been an interference call on Marchessault.

[@andyc9979]

@@LiveTUNA I'm with you. Jones did that to himself. Lot of bogus calls on this video.

[@Adem-zb3uo]

I still remember that crazy header live

[@carlit0s2814]

Head butt goals should count, that was Amazing

[@joer8854]

You can't knock the puck into the net with anything other than your stick. It can hit something like you're head but you can't make it go in. Like it or not it's the right call. I kinda like it but if they do that kicking the puck into the net is also a goal since it's under the same rule and gives the same unfair advantage.

[@confucheese]

It’s cool in theory but way too dangerous, last thing you want in hockey is players throwing their heads toward the puck

[@geneticprodigy2816]

The ones on Boston and Oilers should definitely have been goals

[@jiimmyplayz]

@Puckman637 wrong. They were all terrible calls.

[@andyc9979]

@Puckman637 what lol. The boston one was good but I can see that one going against them compared to the oilers one. The oilers goal not counting is absurd

[@stardustie]

@Puckman637 the last one actually was terrible. Jones was out of the blue paint

[@BostonSecret45]

@@andyc9979 wow i think the opposite. Both should be a goal but atleast with the oilers one u could see mcdavid interfere with smiths stick and that could be an argument.. but the bruins goal.... he literally didnt do anything. he jumped over the goalie he did nothing to interfere with how anderson could make the save...

[@andyc9979]

@@BostonSecret45 I think both should too. I compared the goals which has no meaning. Not sure why I did that. At the time I was saying I can see the Boston one not being as bad as the oilers one. A lot of these are lame. I forgot this video kind of. Was the pronger one on here? I hated Philly and was pissed that goal never counted, the one where they said he waved his hand or something absurd. Because of the Avery goal they got obsessed with that and no one else really did what Avery did. The one Boston one was really absurd when the puck clearly went out of play. Thats ridiculous

[@lilbitofficial9334]

That was a good graver by Shaw I remember watching that game amazing year for the blackhawks

[@ManDove]

As much as I hate the Bruins, pretty sure that goal was a good goal. The goalie laid still thinking it was underneath him. More than enough time to react if he knew where the puck was.

[@philiphatch7600]

I’m in boston so that’s offensive

[@Rindiculousfun]

The thing is the reason he lost sight of the puck was because he was run over. I don’t know why that was a question of interference

[@alexdave2785]

Ya when you see it in slow mo

[@jackmclaughlin605]

No that was the right call, Craig Anderson lost sight of the puck due to the interference by Sean kuraly, no goal was the right call, infact there was another boston overtime goal overturned that same game

[@beavus1269]

No when he laid down he lifted the padimplored and it was loose so it soupd be a goal

[@xRANZIDx]

Loving the frequent uploads :D

[@Jens95]

Saige Trotter Trying to push out as much content as I can 😊

[@leaf8554]

That Shaw goal was so damn good. But hey least Krugs won it for us in 3OT.

[@xxxduttacion6605]

Now do a Brad Marchand nose compilation

[@mattfromcanda]

I dont think he can, it's too long...

[@xxxduttacion6605]

MattFromCanada Underrated reply

[@nigeljames8958]

I>

[@jonathanquick6197]

MattFromCanada he? Do you mean Marchand?

[@parkeranquist543]

Or a Marchand licking compilation

[@MrMinecraftmasters12]

Lol the second one😂😂 dude gets run over and they ask if he was hit hard enough wtf😂😂

[@peterchiarelli4326]

Where's anaheim's ot goal against edmonton? Oh wait..

[@Adem-zb3uo]

Peter Chiarelli yeah lol

[@BradleyJames16]

Hahaha kesler was held in. Ducks won and it was an amazing comeback but oiler fans still cant handle it

[@peterchiarelli4326]

Lou Sassole Not that goal, that wasn't even overtime. There was another one where one ref called an icing which then all the oilers stopped playing, but then seconds later another ref says no icing the ducks pick it up and score

[@peterchiarelli4326]

Lou Sassole Seems like ducks fans have short term memory loss?

[@BradleyJames16]

Hahaha is that all you got? Are you seriously still salty about it? Talk about holding a grudge

[@SebasGS]

Shaw want to be a professional Soccer/football player

[@sebastiancervello]

Every soccer player would have loved Shaw’s goal

[@dylanroot6401]

The call back on McDavids goal was absurd

[@Ghostrider6A]

0:35 Wes McCauley: It has to be a legal fashion, that's not a legal fashion.

[@KidTheHutt]

Holy 7:27 Batman! On the White shirt just in case lol

[@harrisonturner7443]

The Sabres fans seemed happy to have a goal waived off for the foot in the crease

[@iKrow]

That headbutt goal is my favorite one. He just freaking goes for it and it WORKS. If I reviewed that play I'd just give it to them because it was insane.

[@curtiselsey64]

That Edmonton goal should have counted. Also the ref that announced it looks like John Tavares

[@moodlampActual]

Header should be allowed based on skill alone. If we truly want scoring in this game, lettem head it.

[@jonniedelorme7430]

Kevin Crabtree It would be considered high sticking since it’s above the crossbar. Maybe

[@patrickkane93]

Jonnie Delorme He didn't play it with his stick.

[@elijahfoster2]

That would be incredibly dangerous. You don't want people's heads near the thing that people are whacking at.

[@jonniedelorme7430]

Gary Bettman Still above the crossbar boss

[@moodlampActual]

Elijah Foster skate at your own risk, dumb dumb

[@raymondgaule6472]

Bruins got hosed that whole series.

[@joer8854]

The Bruins get away with a shit ton. So much so the fans think that they should be immune to the rules.

[@coltino99]

So what if you’re inside the crease? They changed that rule that allows u to be in the crease before the puck

[@brianferris7859]

No offence oilers fans, but I love your reactions when you are at home and a ot goal is waved of, or any cluch goal.

[@beni1218]

this is an amazing vid idea lol

[@greenwalltree]

The coyotes overtime right here

[@sebc3546]

would've liked to know what team won after the goals were waved off, seems like an incredible adrenaline rush and dump for the team who has their goal waved off lol

[@ryanmarion2728]

Pls do Final Career goals

[@despanjab5239]

Great overtime goals

[@poogan1239]

7:26..boing boing boing...

[@hockeygameing1541]

That is so wrong

[@Goku_in_Real_Life]

She got them Vegas fakies

[@racingfan9910]

I think the Bruins Senators Goal should have counted. Clearly from the over head angle at 1:39 that Anderson made the save but then went off Methot’s body and in.

[@scottshepke669]

@5:55 is a rare look/instance that the browns can win a game

[@tuuletingrilli]

0:44 oof

[@tylerflanary]

You should do Lacrosse style goals/deke shots

[@hondbz8424]

2:52 Ottawa leads 3-1 vs Boston... what Ottawa once participated in playoffs?

[@thecarnut9899]

7:26 makes me want to be a knights fan

[@shmuelosina9099]

It does?

[@DonkeyKiks]

Lol

[@bencarter8423]

I love how every time they know the crowd is going to be pissed, they blame it on Toronto.

[@crazyclips1362]

Do eihl pls

[@WakkoKakko]

How about Michael Grabner of the New York Rangers, Game 5 of the second round at Ottawa, when the goal that he scored was taken back for being played with a high stick?

[@o_troop]

What is with that rittich guy smashing his stick all the time 😂

[@chiefbeanus3224]

Adrian he plays with heart and intensity and he’s very competitive

[@jonathanquick6197]

Courtney, you're making vids at a crazy rate. I love it!

[@themacud]

Fake dumbass

[@jonathanquick6197]

@@themacud One of those is true but i'm not saying which one

[@jordanschlick387]

That Vegas call was bull shit

[@patrickkane93]

Shaws disallowed goal reasoning "According to Rule 78.5 (i) "Apparent goals shall be disallowed when the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick."" Yet Hossa directed a puck in with his skate in game 7 in this series, directing pucks into the net happens all the time does it not?

[@kroboski88]

the rule is more that you can't push it in with anything other than your stick so as long as Hossa didn't kick the puck in it was a good goal. Also if you push it in with something other than your stick and it hits your stick on the way in I think it still counts

[@Radeo]

Yeah originally the no kick rule was for the purpose of safety. Can't be having someone's neck being stepped in a crease scramble. It sort of evolved into the, "only stick by intent rule", but if you happen to direct something in the net with a skate or helmet or w/e (knowingly or unknowingly) as opposed to "propelling" it in, that's okay. Again, we can't have soccer style headers because someone will eventually land on someone else's ankle.

[@victorisballer46]

Shaw is a legend

[@stevenhaskell9025]

Shaws goal was pretty good ngl

[@brxy..]

Stick breaking goals

[@marcusstock8924]

The shawzy goal was the best

[@STNeish]

The first one definitely shouldn't have counted, but what a heads up play. I almost wish they had allowed it. The second one, I think should have counted, Anderson was still in position, he just lost control of the puck because of incidental contact (and I'm a goalie saying that). Third one, the interference definitely affected the goal, so it was correctly disallowed. Fourth one is hundredths of a second... but definitely no goal. Last one was clear interference. No goal.

[@rickhaavisto9023]

If he lost control of the puck due to incidental contact, isn’t that the definition of the goal being waved off?

[@aGucci-_-]

Next playoff ot goals that turned to fight

[@SJ_RANKS]

I f🐬cking hate when they do that it’s annoying enough in regulation but in overtime when you’re just ready to go home is the dirt f🐬cking worst

[@PlotagonTendoFanSteveTheWarioW]

This happened to the Minnesota Wild last night!

[@joeyrose5045]

Cracks me up that Vegas fans legit thought the goal against SJ should have been good, but it doesn’t surprise me. That fanbase doesn’t know a lot about hockey. Doesn’t matter if his arm is outside the crease, you can’t interfere with the goalie

[@ryanlinton5214]

Joey Rose typical. Think you know about Vegas hockey fans. Some are new to the game yes. But most have liked hockey for years. Just finally have a team in Vegas to root for. I hear fans of other teams screaming thinking they have a goal. Why would Vegas be any different? Some players are coming to Vegas because of the atmosphere at T-mobile arena.

[@joeyrose5045]

J Brothers I’m sure there are some people in Vegas who know hockey. There’s also a high amount who don’t know anything about it. I can only speak for myself, but I usually don’t cheer for goals that I know will be disallowed. What’s funny to me is Vegas fans actually thought it should have counted despite Mar. pulling Jones way out of position. If you’re a legit fan and keep it classy and actually know hockey, awesome. Good on you. Most Vegas fans I’ve encountered have been nothing but toxic and don’t represent the organization very well.

[@ryanlinton5214]

@@joeyrose5045 been watching hockey since I was a kid. Would play roller hockey with the whole neighborhood. Pretend I was Patrick Roy. Some fans are new, yes. But fans have to start somewhere. Once I saw the replay I knew it would be called interference and stopped celebrating. But I HATE when people say vegas knows nothing about hockey. We may be new, but we dont live under rocks here. Hell people actually think some of us live in hotels ha. I work on the strip near T-Mobile and I ask the away fans how it was after a game and they say how amazing it was. That vegas fans are legit, and it's the loudest game they have ever been to. It may take a little bit, but give us a chance. And then when seattle gets their team, go bash on them 😁

[@ptoedits5644]

As much as I think vegas fans know nothing, they made the complete wrong call. He’s outside the paint, it’s on Jones for getting caught outside the paint

[@joeyrose5045]

ThreeStarEdits Vine I’m guessing you thought the high touch goal Boston scored vs San Jose a couple weeks ago was completely legal too, right?

[@vincerowan7903]

8:10. The Sharks player pushed Marchessault into Jones so Vegas should’ve challenged the call so that they could’ve won. I am saying this because I am a Vegas fan from Philly but I do like the Flyers as my #1 team. Vegas is my 2nd

[@eggsaladactyl]

It was a super weak call. Goalie interference is like this sometimes though. Sometimes a goalie gets plowed over at the front of his crease, the puck goes in, good goal. Sometimes a goalie gets hit by their own teammate or pushes/directs an opposing player in to their own goalie, the puck goes in, no goal.

[@joedevil29]

eh, they ended up winning that series anyways in 6 so karma rewarded them

[@EvanCatani]

I was always taught that the goalie is entitled to the blue paint. ANY contact from the opposition is goaltender interference.

[@themacud]

5:27 Flyers lost

[@Radeo]

None of those were goals, but dammed if that Ottawa - Boston one wasn't near-impossible to call.

[@geneticprodigy2816]

Boston’s and Oilers should definitely have been goals

[@meriamsmadi3762]

Radeo Oilers on Calgary was 100 percent goal

[@bruceliptak761]

You know how McDavid got by the d men against Calgary so fast is because Johnny geudreu was playing D😐

[@stpbasss3773]

What D 😂

[@beavus1269]

Jens95 do a video about people running on the ice

[@macweller4748]

Shout out to Hail the Villain at 1:23

[@sjoak4084]

0:43 Andrew Shaw pulls a Draymond Green on Beauchemin

[@smurfymcgee1037]

I mean they’re basically the same people, Shaw is the Green of the NHL, and Green is the Shaw of the NBA

[@pjcanes2239]

The Edmonton goal is good, the stick wasn't needed for the save.

[@casartherandom3010]

Yeahhh...agreed.

[@etiendre]

You're on fire !

[@goff38]

How was Detroit’s goal no goal? They changed the foot in the crease a while ago.

[@nsant]

Im surprised the hand pass goal by the sharks vs the blues in game 3 wasn't on here. Oh wait... it wasn't waved off.

[@TheJinxCast]

Absolutely no reason why the header shouldn't have counted. The rulebook needs to be fixed and Gary needs to lose his job.

[@rocket3216]

There’s nothing in the hockey rule book that says u can’t hit the puck in with your head

[@adambeady8819]

There is unfortunately

[@brennanwilkie3649]

How about last second tying/winning goals?

[@liamcampbell200]

NHL:End to end goals

[@TheY2AProblem]

Oh so now they disallowed a goal scored on Buffalo with a skate in the crease.

[@jmcginnis3030]

Do crazy ot goals

[@bryanfrombuffalo7685]

Brett hull was in the crease

[@ather4300]

Im just saying I think head butt goals should be goals, when he do you see that, like you would not see that alot

[@bernie13boncsdearaujo95]

Oh I thought it said 20 but it says 20T

[@zacharyjones7948]

Goaltender interference might be worse than roughing the QB.... This is getting stupid

[@theleafsfan9206]

Andrew Shaw hit that other dude in the bad spot

[@max2831]

It's a me a no goal It's supposed to sound like mario

[@danamedley8009]

Max he

[@samuelflowers3166]

These referees are so one sided 😂

[@itzfearlesseichner6809]

@Puckman637 thats what you think

[@crazypenguin3512]

andrew shaw thought he was Ronaldo 💀

[@coltino99]

Where’s the rule that says you can’t headbutt it into the goal? I mean there’s a rule for kicking but was there one for using your head?

[@marleyvernall9056]

The Oilers and Vegas ones should have counted

[@juliansousa3781]

The Detroit goal at 5:36 should have been counted. No goalie interference. Bad call

[@Blackattack7958]

Every goal other than the time expired goal should have counted. The head butt goal especially. I never heard of the no intentionally head butting a puck to score a goal in not allowed. High sticking yes but head butt no. Makes me wonder if you can intentionally use you actual BUTT to score a goal or even your belly.

[@natetamminga3122]

LOL last night too!

[@Jakethegreat0317]

Do a shoot out goals waved off

[@SFascetta777]

Still of the opinion the Boston/Ottawa goal should've counted... And so should Vegas' for that matter...

[@ShadowBones14]

PuckNerd Boston yes vegas no, kuraly has a breakaway took his shot and before he touched Anderson, Anderson was going down and he made no effort on the play and sold it. Marschessault had a chance to avoid the contract with jones but didn’t see it and jones wasn’t in the crease, he possibly sold it but I don’t think he did, I’m biased like all fans but that’s my opinion

[@phillip22722]

Actually, the title "OT Goals Waved Off" suggests that all of these were goals and they were unfairly called off. That is not the case, at least with the first clip. It is against the rules to intentionally use anything other than your stick to shoot the goal into the net. So a better title would be "Illegal plays at the Net in OT"... or whatever other phasing that sounds better. At least if all the other moments are similarly against the rules.

[@christopherbell2091]

Who commentated this footage in written form? Bizarre

[@Hockeid09]

I think a head but goal should be totally allowed

[@elsyx8966]

Nice Guy

[@kingsantacruz2866]

I always thought that, like is basketball, the shot is legal as long as it is no longer in contact by the offensive player. I'm confused at 4:50 why they are reviewing it. Ik Basketball and Hockey are different but the shot was made before time expired.

[@demitrivavaroutsos4141]

King Santa Cruz it has to cross the line before time expires where as in basketball the ball just has to be released.

[@tesla__124]

Go marsh- WHAT AGHHHHHHHH