Really enjoying this series and would very much appreciate hearing the rest of your analysis but only if you have the time and energy. But anyway, thank you very much!
@Messerschmidtbf1098 ай бұрын
3 years ago you commented on a moth man song by studio bunny
@MichaelPiercePhilosophy8 ай бұрын
But the mothman did not answer. He just kept on mothing.
@egcm38 ай бұрын
Michael, do you believe in objective truth?
@AeonBaudrillard8 ай бұрын
"Resentment"? Pardon? The only resentful one is the Lord himself for giving the third servant one talent. And, as I am sure you can see, this servant's refusal to sanitize the Father's resentment and Jesus Christ's refusal to produce more surplus of pagan venality are one and the same. Moreover, you yourself say, in this video, that the Nietzschean insight is quite literally paganism-and formally, at that: wallowing in the landfill of "symbols" (a vulgarity greater than Matter itself); something irreconcilable with the forceful, catastrophic, end of signification at Golgotha.
@MichaelPiercePhilosophy8 ай бұрын
Well, I'm afraid I still don't know what exactly your criticism is. I confess that I find your comments rather annoying, like someone constantly yelling at me in a foreign language. On the other hand, you're also clearly one of my most dedicated and passionate viewers for this series, for which I can only thank you at this point. It's unironically nice to know that someone so consistently judges my work worthy of comment.
@AeonBaudrillard8 ай бұрын
@@MichaelPiercePhilosophy This one (my reply) is pretty basic, no? You said that the third servant is (probably) resentful. I claim that it is the one who does Evil, in this case the Lord, who is resentful, not the one who suffers said Evil, in this case the third servant.