Tony, I’m another one of your viewers who is glad to see you posting again. I actually own this lens. I got super lucky. I purchased it from a retired photographer who sold it to me about 5 years ago at a very reasonable price. I love this lens. It’s big and heavy but well worth the weight in my bag! Some of my own favorite images have also been made with this lens. I actually used this very lens this morning, and seeing your review of it was a great way to end this evening.
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
I really don’t know the impact that my videos have on people. Thank you Robert for letting me know. I appreciate your support and am glad that you share the same passion for this lens.😎
@squeller17 ай бұрын
Tony you have restarted the chanel! That’s amazing!
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Thanks Josef! I'm trying to give it another go. 😃
@Lt96027 ай бұрын
@@tonysantophotographywe are always in need of great large format content!!
@swift45677 ай бұрын
Great video, Tony! Glad to see you posting more videos.
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the encouragement Landon! I’ll try my best! 😎
@jaytayag8107 ай бұрын
Great video, Tony! I never considered that it needed a Sinar board rather than a Linhof board. That thing is huge!
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Thanks Jay! I definitely could do without the hugeness! 😂
@lumenetumbra42237 ай бұрын
I used to own the Schneider 150 XL which was much, much lighter and compact but with a huge falloff, unbearable on Velvia. After a few years an internal element started to fog by itself (element separation?) but Schneider refused to fix it under warranty . I decided to sell it "as is" and started to look for the only real alternative: the Nikkor 150 SW. I was very lucky to get one online for more or less the same you paid! Great lens!
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
What a great story! Thank you for sharing your experiences with us! 😎
@hosepdeyrmenjian85567 ай бұрын
Great and informative video Tony, really enjoyed it. I use the Nikkor 120/8 SW lens, great optics, just covers 8x10, I crop the image if I apply movements, 7"x9" still better than 4x5. I have the Rodensock 155/6.8, beautiful lens, coverage 370mm at f11 and over 380mm at f22, plenty room for movements, no feel the need for central filters.
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Great information Hosep! Thanks for sharing with all of us. I appreciate your support. 😎
@andyvan56927 ай бұрын
thanks Tony, I have a 4x5" sinar F2 with the Fuji 90SW f5.6 acting as a wide (21-28mm in 135 format); so get your filter issues, thanks for explaining that, especially the vignetting part, as most filter systems top out at 82mm filter thread dia. even the 100mm square systems, however Kase, Lee, and others do circular polarisers, ND's etc for this 95/105mm filter size which is the main option here, esp. for those doing Architecture, Car and street photography where glare and overexposure are problems we face regularly. PS this is also an issue for Hasselblad H users (the HCD 35/300 lenses use a 95mm size to).
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great information Andy! I appreciate your support.
@sgroadie63677 ай бұрын
Good video. I have the Nikon W 180 and the SW 90 and SW 75. On a Sinar X. I only shoot 4x5 though. Thanks for the review.
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Sounds like a nice setup! Thanks for watching! I appreciate your support! 😎
@nelsonclub77226 ай бұрын
Its a great lens - had one about a hundred years ago on a Toyo 10x 8 rail shooting industrial and commercial on Trans
@tonysantophotography6 ай бұрын
Great to hear! I appreciate your support! 😎
@user-dk7uk8wx8j7 ай бұрын
Hello Tony, thanks for sharing your experience. SW 150 is out of my price range, but I am currently considering SW 120 or even SA 120, slightly cheaper than SW. I am still hoping for larger image circle of those when stopped down beyond f22.
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
They are still great lenses. Thanks for watching Radovan! 😎
@jonathanhotopf18236 ай бұрын
Only the price would put me off this lens, my heaviest lens is 8kg (17.6 lbs). I’ll have to stick with 5x7 for wide angle photography.
@tonysantophotography6 ай бұрын
Wow! I thought mine was heavy! 😮 Thanks for watching! I appreciate your support!
@nigelwbАй бұрын
What does SW mean?
@tonysantophotographyАй бұрын
I believe it stands for “high speed wide angle” but I’m not 100% certain. Thanks for watching!😎
@wdb19327 ай бұрын
So just camera and lens for Tony $10k. Awesome😂! Great stuff. I have meager 360mm Rodenstock that only weighs 3.5 lb.
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Ha! Kind of scary when u add it all up! The 360 is a great lens! I have that one too but the shutter is broken.
@hautehussey7 ай бұрын
It’s s-eye-nar, not sea-nar, right?
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
From my understanding, people have pronounced it both ways. Not 100% sure. 😮
@c.augustin7 ай бұрын
"sea-nar" - it's a Swiss company, so the German pronunciation is the "correct" one. Maybe rather with a smooth S (more like "zea-nar"), but I'm not sure, even as a German … ;-)
@tonysantophotography7 ай бұрын
Thank you for the clarification Christian. I appreciate your input. 😎
@hautehussey7 ай бұрын
@@c.augustin i looked up some more official videos and it appears that it’s neither. It’s sin-nar.
@c.augustin7 ай бұрын
@@hautehussey Couldn't find any. If you mean a short "i" in German, than it makes (some) sense.