I've done lots of tests with rope rubbing over rope, under body weight. My setups that caused melting of the sling were pretty unrealistic, but they took just 6 seconds. The key is what motion would ever build up frictional heat fast enough for melting in that geometry? Maybe hang an 80 kg weight, and swing it back and forth from the base a reproducible amount.
@freerideshuttle9 ай бұрын
That's why you use a carabiner. I've learnt the hard way too, once I had no point of going ahead and as a newbie I just repelled on a extra piece of rope I had and while descending to ground I didn't notice what happened, saw it only on yhe second try of that route
@benda189 ай бұрын
6 seconds is a relief. I can't last anywhere near that long.
@TonySpinach9 ай бұрын
Now we need a bfk retrace tutorial ahahah
@dustinjohnson62565 ай бұрын
Can you please leave the kN on screen longer? Freaking love your content! And will be purchasing from your shop soon!
@9711will7 ай бұрын
Strikes me as a “get me the fuck out of this situation” sort of set up.
@stusue97339 ай бұрын
You need to rename your channel! "You Might Not Die" lol
@benda189 ай бұрын
Super alive enough for a while
@pappafritto9 ай бұрын
@@benda18ahaha haaa
@muell0009 ай бұрын
Isn't it almost the same as when you tie into an harness?
@Govanification9 ай бұрын
Look closely at a harness, the fabric tie-in points are super thick and reinforced, typically nylon and sometimes even have hard plastic inserts to reduce wear. A thin dyneema sling will wear through much faster than a harness.
@1reklawm9 ай бұрын
It's fine like that. Double legs twice the capacity. Adding a carabiner to the 2 leg to rope connection be best.
@Cardsandstoagies7 ай бұрын
Explain the difference between fixing a line like that and a harness!
@kenferrin73505 ай бұрын
It’s amazing how strong that dyneema is.
@m2rsvp9 ай бұрын
I would use a six inch piece of fresh 1" tubular webbing, on the sliding X where the F8 is rubbing, not taped, to allow inspection. That's just me. Not advice. 😊
@aggamemnon6669 ай бұрын
Slightly fine for once.
@ianrogers28724 ай бұрын
Use a super8/bunny ears instead!
@paulgaras26069 ай бұрын
I am confused why you’d want to do that tho
@pierreolsson5889 ай бұрын
Fixing lines on bigwalls to save gear. I have done it, but only for a couple of days.
@pappafritto9 ай бұрын
@@markpell8979what’s a “runner” here?
@pappafritto9 ай бұрын
@@markpell8979 okay i see. We have 15-20 meters of 6mm expendable rope for that purpose (for any purpose in fact)
@pentachronic9 ай бұрын
@@pierreolsson588 Bunny ears direct into carabiners at anchor points ? You saved a sling and a potential hazard.
@mattrogers61847 ай бұрын
No, 3 baskets and a shackle. It would be ideal if ropes had an engineered eyelet with a plastic blunter on the inside…
@colereece39029 ай бұрын
It seems you could just use a static anchor rather than a self equalizing and be fine. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.
@user-ik4tb9lf8t9 ай бұрын
like to see a bowline on a bite or french in this configuration without the slings
@offimoo99956 ай бұрын
How about a bowline?
@gregoryfoster25477 ай бұрын
not something I would do often and I might keep track of the slings used in that situation.
@Patrick-nl4zp9 ай бұрын
Maybe tie a BFK haha
@pappafritto9 ай бұрын
In my opinion, in general NOTHING would ever happen because there is no rope on rope friction especially if you’re aware of this and don’t move the rope sideways. But anyways the system is not the one I’d use having just a carabiner though
@iamfuckingyourwaifuandther27437 ай бұрын
Yea dude, if you think about it in basic physics principles we are using frictionless ropes, so the real world doesn't apply.
@SailingAquamarine9 ай бұрын
So, why would you do that? Well i suppose you could argue that it gives an even load between the anchors and would only move when there is no load? Or maybe you only have one sling on your belt 😞
@PAClimber9 ай бұрын
Just add a locker
@julietgolf33317 ай бұрын
Beal escaper is rope on rope in a static load. And we both know it bomber
@lucluc59768 ай бұрын
Is bfk big f#%kin knot?
@harlanstockman57039 ай бұрын
Extremely unrealistic conditions.
@jameslochhead59509 ай бұрын
I think it safe enough, but I can’t see a scenario where it would be necessary There’s definitely better options with the same amount of kit In fact, there’s options that are actually safer which require less kit You could just use a bunny is figure 8, and eliminate the sling in Tiley and it would be redundant because one line of the knot could get cut
@chrisrecord19758 ай бұрын
There’s a universal way to do things people.😑 just learn the systems and quit being lazy and maybe you won’t end up a grease spot at the base of the crag.
@hightalenttraining75468 ай бұрын
How 2 (maybe) not die... 🤣
@davidtorres83965 ай бұрын
Carabiners are like 10 dollars though…
@geothr336 ай бұрын
I don’t even know what a BFK is
@AlexHarvey19802 ай бұрын
Does experiment, ignores results in conclusion.
@Frostbiker13 күн бұрын
A single experiment doesn't prove much, especially when lives are on the line.
@ronl71319 ай бұрын
Not recommended.
@Zogg12819 ай бұрын
I would want to be the idiot that tries this out in the real world. Your test only showed that it wouldn't break in an environment that doesn't introduce movement into the system. With someone hanging off that setup, they'll be moving around enough to literally where through that sling in somewhere between a few seconds and, if they're lucky, a few minutes........ hopefully, they'll be close enough to the floor when it fails 😅
@johngo62839 ай бұрын
Yes, bad.
@nathanielglavurdic42149 ай бұрын
Sheet bend is a lot more practical???
@edover513158 ай бұрын
I feel like you're over-cautiously not honest about results. It seems safe to me from this test. Why would you not use this multiple times? Any data to support?