"No Cheating!" || Magnus Carlsen DISRESPECTS Hans Niemann w/ CRAZY Rook Sacrifice! (Magnus vs Hans!)

[@drmikechess]

Are you Team Hans or Team Magnus? Let me know in the comments section below!

[@terronescyril8494]

Magnus is a MONSTER!

[@nikhildawani2913]

Team Magnus always

[@lifeonsibuyanphilippines7212]

Hans

[@DaejinTye]

Honestly, Magnus is my favorite due to his seemingly inhuman understanding of the game. However, I cannot just not root for an underdog in someone like Hans. I really want to see Hans reach the top-5 in the world of chess and cement himself there because I like his story and want to see the entertainment his personality would provide reaching those heights. Still, Magnus is my favorite, so gotta say I am ultimately Team Magnus.

[@matrix31003]

I love your analysis. I think it is high level. I own an apparel company and I'm looking for players in chess that can represent our brand well. Would you be open to a discussion for collaboration? I can go into details and show some examples of our exceptional chess designs. Let me know if interested.

[@bestdoom1236]

What is amazing is how Magnus calmly beats a player of Hans' strength as if he were playing a student of the game. It was said of Capablanca that Capablanca's plans were clear and understood by their opponents, but they couldn't defend against those. They knew, 20 moves in advance what Capablanca would do but could not counteract the plan. This game reminds me of that. Magnus sacrifices a rook for the bishop, and one can deduce that he will create an endgame in which the two bishops thrive. This is clear from the beginning but cannot be stopped. He executes with such simplicity and accuracy. Magnus is a reincarnation of Capablanca and Kasparov in one integrated player.

[@rv706]

Yet the evaluation bar seems to favor White by (relatively speaking) a lot after the exchange sac

[@bestdoom1236]

@@rv706 Yes, it was a bad sac in theory and according to the engine, but a human could not stop the plan

[@boboho3928]

Hans just not a top player

[@yohaneszeiss]

Hans literally got destroyed by IM Gotham Chess

[@yanair2091]

Well let's be realistic: Hans's play after about 14:20 mark was abysmal :(

[@thecolorsapp1403]

how freaking good is the man, that end game is just magic. as a chess numpty I can do nothing but look upon that end game with sheer awe.

[@josephsalmonte4995]

The world champion is very good at Chess? Unbelievable

[@WAATLP]

It's ok to be impressed.​@@josephsalmonte4995

[@stevencosnyka7698]

It is disheartening to know we can't compete with these guys. Infact there are young girls who could dismantle our games. I top out at 1300 ELO lol...but I love to play still.

[@drmikechess]

Yes Magnus is just a monster! 👍

[@drmikechess]

@@josephsalmonte4995 It's incomprehensible!

[@CrisFerrerYT]

3:41 in my opinion Bd7 a very logical move to develop it and probably bring the rook to the center behind his queen, instead of attacking the pawn on e3.

[@TedRader]

He didn't sac his rook, he sacrificed the exchange...HUGE difference

[@yanair2091]

When you give stronger piece for weaker, that's sacrifice. For example if he gave up queen for knight instead of rook, you wouldn't object calling it queen sacrifice.

[@timothylee2772]

​​​​​@@yanair2091Sacking is like taking out a pawn with a knight to get a positional advantage for an inevitable mate of your opponent or something like that.

[@erlendsteren9466]

@@yanair2091 Its an exchangesacrifice, he gets a bishop for a rook, and that is not the same as a ordinary sacrifice when you for example gets tempo or position for the officer.

[@drmikechess]

Brother, if Magnus gives up his queen for a rook and bishop, is that a queen sac? Or are you going to argue it's not a queen sac, because he got some compensation for it? REALLY? Is it a rook sacrifice? YES Is it an exchange sacrifice? YES, that's more specific Is it sacrificing the rook for a bishop? YES, that's even more specific (the exchange can mean the rook for the knight or the bishop). So both definitions are true. By your logic, calling it an exchange sacrifice is inaccurate because that is also insufficiently precise (does not denote for the knight or bishop). So my question for you, if Magnus gives up the queen for the rook and bishop, is that a queen sac? Because by your logic, it is not, but the logic of literally 100% of chess players is that it is indeed a queen sac. Same goes for the rook sac 😉

[@drmikechess]

@@yanair2091 Exactly! This guy gets it 👍

[@77Tenacity1]

Great commentary. you've made it easy for beginners to follow!

[@brianmurphy5036]

Magnus to Hans: "who's yo' daddy?!"

[@ekkehard8]

10% adopted

[@ADJose-pn4fp]

p.daddy..why?

[@drmikechess]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@drmikechess]

@@ekkehard8 😂😂😂

[@drmikechess]

@@ADJose-pn4fp 😂😂😂

[@Sosapotence3001990]

Like your style, earned a Sub

[@JoshuaHults]

Magnus made his point.

[@drmikechess]

Hahaha it was a statement!

[@charleseichab8958]

Ulf Anderson played similar sac many decades ago

[@drmikechess]

Which game? I'd love to see it!

[@rhwoodwork119]

Great stuff, I like your analysis of the game. It's always good to see Magnus completely lose the game but then win in a few moves.

[@drmikechess]

Thank you! And hahaha yes that is classic Magnus Carlsen! I'm doing my best to keep improving my commentary, I think you will like my newer videos as well!

[@TroyBarnett]

Chess speaks for itself.

[@drmikechess]

The rook sacrifice certainly does! 👍

[@HalDanGhor]

5:30 What about Bishop g7 here?

[@Monetalks]

This was phenomenal playing! Wow!

[@Mubarak-11B]

Hans chess spoke for itself when he was in a monitored room. 😂

[@ravirajmayapur]

@13:05, why doesn't white play Nf6, forcing an exchange with blacks dark squared bishop

[@Batstone22]

Good question, I'm guessing because after the exchange of Bishop and Knight, Magnus would use the light squared Bishop to pick off the a4 pawn, and then he has a 2 to 1 pawn advantage on the queen side. And soon Hans would be down 3 pawns as the black rook eyes b4 After that it doesn't seem like there are many moves for white. The rook would defend the Bishop on a4. Black's pawn structure is just so strong on both sides that, back to the original question, once you trade the knight for dark bishop, after that, it's black who has targets to pick off, but white would have not much to attack even with 2 rooks.

[@drmikechess]

👍

[@drmikechess]

@@Batstone22 Thanks for answering this question for me brother! Much appreciated! 👍👍👍

[@mpmpm]

It is not disrespectful to taking the bishop. It is just another reasonable move. I wouldn't say a perfect move, but a reasonable move? Yes.

[@kilroy1964]

Within the context of the enormous drama between them, yes this is in fact purposely disrespecting Hans.

[@drmikechess]

@@kilroy1964 Hahahaha yes I think so, this is how players disrespect each other at the chess board hahaha. It's a typical Magnus move (slightly weird but still strong), but against Hans, we know exactly what Magnus is thinking hahaha

[@drmikechess]

Well it's Magnus intentionally playing a slightly bad and very provocative move against someone he admits he does not like, this is how chess players show disrespect at the chess board haha, but yes I see your point!

[@sbarmiueenl]

Translation: "I bet I can play this audacious line and you're not strong enough to punish me for it."

[@Ten2e1ght]

Hans was given a few opportunities and scuffed them deserved win

[@jorge-alberto]

Man, I really don´t get the thing about disrespect. I haven´t seen any disrespect anywhere in this game. Magnus knows he is a better positional player, and he saw that there was no immediate disadvantage on exchanging a rook for a bishop, so he goes for it. In fact, Magnus just chose the most obvious way to stop the bishop exchange on g7, which could lead to a bad position for black. This whole idea of disrespect was just clickbait.

[@bentorefrland5722]

I think we safely can call it "retorics"

[@getwealthywithravi]

Maybe, but he could have won the extra pan for the exchange sac, instead he chooses not to. May be this is interpreted as disrespect by this guy. Anyway sometimes Magnus is Magnus, he plays weird openings, intentionally goes into bad positions, most of the times victorious in end games, that is strength. The greatest end game player of all time and one of the greatest chess player.

[@Markus451]

Yes, but this 'disrespect' idea is GOOD clickbiat, which is unfortunately needed to build a YT channel these days. But it's an old idea. I remember a heavyweight boxing match (before UFC took over) where the very fast boxer tried throwing his right cross with NO jab beforehand, and this was considered very 'disrespectful' because everyone 'knows' you can't just throw a powerful right without some kind of lead-up preparation. But just like with Magnus, the move WORKED because it was unexpected. WTF ever trains to defend against that? Nobody. Plus it's always great to make your opponent angry because then he forgets the plan so carefully developed with his coaches. PS: Who remembers the boxing match I'm talking about? Was it Ali using his right hand to jab Foreman & piss him off?

[@MrBorndd]

He is playing with contempt by not playing the objectively best move but instead going for the slightly worse but more complex move. Knowing his opponent is not strong enough to deal with the complications.

[@drmikechess]

The immediate disadvantage is he gave up the rook for the bishop for highly questionable compensation, the move was objectively dubious and Hans Niemann had the better position for a while after the sac and as a direct result of the sac. Add the flashiness of the move, and his relationship with Hans Niemann specifically, and many people would interpret this as Magnus making a "statement." But yes I see your point 100% 👍

[@thingsmac]

The CHESS WORLD IS IN SHOCK AFTER MAGNUS...[wait, this game is 2 years old, I guess I can't use the standard title]

[@drmikechess]

Brother, I've never started a title with "the chess world is in shock after Magnus..." I think you're talking about @epicchess? that sounds more like his titles to me? I like @epicchess, so no beef here, he has great titles. My titles are much more like "Magnus Carlsen SHOCKS & DESTROYS The Chess World" 😉 I like these titles better because they work no matter how old the game is 😉😉😉 (but I do try to keep the vast majority of my games from this year!)

[@samh1014]

This commentary was great i felt wired in the whole time

[@DerKleineThilo]

Can someone tell me what the problem with black bishop to g7 would be at 5:55 would be?

[@drmikechess]

Can someone help this man out? Sorry I'm super busy replying to comments and filming!

[@CrisFerrerYT]

The way I see it, it would be good for Black. Magnus probably misses this strategy. I'm not sure if Dr. Mike would agree with this continuation, but if black plays Bg7, white's queen should take the knight on e4. Then if Bg7 captures the knight on c3, it attacks the rook. This leads to Q x Q and Rook x Q. At that point, the white rook likely needs to move to c1 to attack the bishop, but then black rook takes e3, which also protects the bishop. I believe that if white queen doesn’t take the knight on e4, they will lose their knight after Bg7 captures on c3. sorry, I'm just a musician who loves chess. Are there any better ideas from more experienced players, so I can learn ? Thanks.

[@eliasknudsen6639]

on 8:41 isnt it a very good/interesting move for magnus to move bishop to g4?

[@rhwoodwork119]

I did realy enjoy this video. Cheers man.

[@drmikechess]

Thank you brother! Keep coming back, I have new videos posted daily and I think my videos get a lot better each week!

[@MrCrchandler]

Very similar to an exchange sacrifice for dark square control Ulf Anderson once made against Karpov on the black side of a Taimanov Sicilian. The first game Karpov lost after becoming world champion.

[@evermilion4221]

and he sacrifices THE ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCK

[@JohnHenryJones-u1r]

That would totally me blundering checkmate as black.

[@drmikechess]

Hahahaha I'm glad I'm not the only one! That was a savage attempt by Hans, fighting against Magnus till the bitter end, but as usual Magnus pulls through!

[@victoraouizerat3366]

15:10 why Hans is not playing Knight e4 -> g5

[@jeremysaint]

at 14:52 why not take the pawn with the rook instead of moving the knight? what am i missing?

[@jeremysaint]

oops, im a dummy. ignore that

[@allanfifield8256]

Reminds me of Fìscher- Spasskii Game 13 with the rook falling against 3 passed pawns.

[@drmikechess]

OMG I just rewatched that game, it is incredible ❤❤❤

[@minhazparvez8516]

Magnus plays modern day Tal

[@drmikechess]

Yes Magnus is a monster!

[@deanonodinosaur7257]

He must have been watching Levy around that time

[@vehicleregistrationspain]

I tune in to these like it's Bond v Bond villain.

[@drmikechess]

Hahaha well it certainly is more fun having someone play the role of "villain" in the chess world (it's such a country club sport), although I'm not so sure Hans is a Villain!

[@vehicleregistrationspain]

@@drmikechess I think he enjoys winding people up. Seen his videos about Hikaru? Cracks me up ,he gives him some needle..

[@saeedmandegani1037]

very beautiful analyze!💚💚💚

[@drmikechess]

Thank you brother! I have new videos coming out daily, I will be doing new videos like this for a very long time! 👍

[@bigheartsmolpen]

This Agnes Pearlson guy is going to be a star someday. Mark my words.

[@drmikechess]

I don't know who that is, but if you're talking about me, brother I literally might be the fastest growing chess youtuber other than Gotham! A star is already born! lol

[@bigheartsmolpen]

@@drmikechess Don't be cocky, kid! You are still a comet at best. Brace for impact, shooting stars are not actually stars lol

[@newt2120]

all fun and games till the Nans Heman guy puts in his vibrating buttplug and beats him the world stage

[@bjornlangoren3002]

Seems magnus is doing just fine without my help.

[@drmikechess]

I must not get the joke, does Magnus need your help? Haha

[@Lichtinsicht]

the chess definitely spoke for itself on this one!

[@drmikechess]

Yes agreed 100%!

[@KevinWood44]

Hans is scary good though. Not sure if he will out play the young Indian players but his future is bright

[@timothylee2772]

I would have done that, sacrifice your knight to get the other pawn too. A rook against two bishops....it's a good chance for a draw.

[@drmikechess]

👍

[@agentxyz]

awesome video tx. Now they should both get lawyers and continue the fight in court like last time

[@drmikechess]

Thanks brother! I'm still improving, I hope my newer videos are even better! And nooooo it's much more fun to watch them battle it out over the chess board haha

[@agentxyz]

@@drmikechess what kind of Dr are you?

[@marcel2711]

Magnus beats stockfish.. that was awesome :D

[@drmikechess]

😂😂😂 Nah Hans is the real deal! No Cheating! Lol

[@Maroci222]

what is chess title Dr. ??

[@arthurdent5357]

I know what a Rucksack is, but what's Rrifice?

[@NotGovernor]

When you say "idea" I think you mean "option" or "move"...?

[@muratyildiz506]

the cheater will remember this loss his whole crappy life

[@kelloth3888]

Hans would have won the game if he had his lucky beads with him. Great game by magnus. No disrespect can be seen on this match.

[@sirajkp3642]

Magnum carlsen THE GOAT OF CHESS ❤️

[@mace9930]

Magnesium Carbon

[@drmikechess]

❤

[@drmikechess]

@@mace9930 ❤

[@victorfinberg8595]

1:10 technically, no. ALMOST any day of the week

[@josephjoseph5480]

What a game ; and what a Genius !

[@drmikechess]

Yes Magnus is just too good! 👍

[@spockofdune8657]

International Ch.eater Hans lost so many points since he stopped ch.eating ! 2642... Chess has spoken !

[@Markus451]

This 'disrespect' idea is GOOD clickbiat, which is unfortunately needed to build a YT channel these days. But it's an old idea. I remember a heavyweight boxing match (before UFC took over) where the very fast boxer tried throwing his right cross with NO jab beforehand, and this was considered very 'disrespectful' because everyone 'knows' you can't just throw a powerful right without some kind of lead-up preparation. But just like with Magnus, the move WORKED because it was unexpected. WTF ever trains to defend against that? Nobody. Plus it's always great to make your opponent angry because then he forgets the plan so carefully developed with his coaches. PS: Who remembers the boxing match I'm talking about? Was it Ali using his right hand to jab Foreman & piss him off?

[@SirSaavedra]

Rock was always defending that pawn

[@wajdivan]

15:21 - if Hans played knight F6 he could have been the winner with Rook h7 checkmate

[@allanfifield8256]

The idea of the exchang sac would occur to me, but I could never milk it to a successful conclusion. I wonder if Carsen prepared this on a high level computer. Computers seem to often prefer 2 B's to 2 R's.

[@peterl.2927]

Bishop g8 would prevent the checkmate!

[@RT-js4tz]

It would be better without the checker player commentary.

[@hotcoffeemethod]

It's not really an insane rook sacrifice, Benjamin Finegold says very clearly to always sac the exchange

[@hotcoffeemethod]

Realistically speaking, this is typical Grunfeld strategy, likely with a ton of theory behind it. Grunfeld is a scary opening, and even playing similar to the Grunfeld is scary. Also, the best way to beat an attacking player is to attack them.

[@jrtodd-br4zc]

Hans feeling that Magnus DEEEEEEP in his guts. Probably a lot less pleasure able than the beads. Poor Hans misses his beads

[@parthsavyasachi9348]

As long magnut is enjoying them beads 😅😅😅

[@wulfwarren]

10:40 here, the cheater activates his cheating device in his right shoe

[@DrSergioValdez]

Thanks!

[@CodexPermutatio]

Unbalanced games are the best.

[@csikel22]

you do like the word disrespect

[@THA1ErAsEr]

15:28 : threatening chetmate

[@tiborkoos188]

clickbait title is annoying,. petty fraud

[@drmikechess]

Clickbait is when you advertise XYZ, and do not deliver XYZ in the video It's subjective, but I believe this video 100% delivers on the promise of Magnus Carlsen disrespecting Hans Niemann with a rook sacrifice (which is objectively dubious). Can you please explain what part of the title I did not deliver on in the video? Or are you inventing some alterative definition of "clickbait title?" I'm genuinely curious brother :) Anyways I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@tiborkoos188]

@@drmikechess The title implied that Magnus did something similar as in the past - walk out without finishing the game. But he did nothing like that. He simply outplayed his opponent and that is not being "disrespectful". The deception was to imply that there was some drama at the game, but there wasn't. This is the definition of clickbait.

[@robertrichards4930]

Hanns haven't earned respect.

[@frakplease3771]

Ng5 Rf7# missed it

[@Maroci222]

It is so difficult to concentrate on the game when comment is annoing

[@yohaneszeiss]

Hans nieman literally got destroyed by GothamChess bro. That's why magnus beat him easier which makes SENSE

[@athiestperson5947]

Levi beat Nepo fabi alireza also is he future wc No one off flukes don’t count lil boy

[@felixucati]

Crazy how Hans missed Nxb5 in the endgame. Magnus was never really winning that game up until that point.

[@dustmicks1]

Pretty sure you only breathed at the start and then at the end of this video haha

[@drmikechess]

Hahahaha I am working on it! Sorry brother!

[@dannyfriotorrez3336]

Just unreal

[@ElEcodelTren]

awesome game

[@idigashi7690]

Youre speaking and commenting like hans wouldnt drag u around like a doll

[@Xxposure2000]

Bro doing tricks on it😮‍💨

[@Maroci222]

Can you keep normal voice. Is is anoing to listen this raised tone

[@NoahPenn13]

Magnus violated lol best endgame/closer

[@Briarhobbit]

What an exciting game.

[@hh46465]

G2 Take that fishy boy 🤣🤣🤣🤣love seeing the true level of cheaters

[@muratyildiz506]

Hans Niemann (Niemand) the cheater

[@matrix31003]

I love your analysis. I think it is high level. I own an apparel company and I'm looking for players in chess that can represent our brand well. Would you be open to a discussion for collaboration? I can go into details and show some examples of our exceptional chess designs. Let me know if interested.

[@RT-js4tz]

I just cant watch with all the arrows, colors and the idiot running his mouth.

[@LonexWolf415]

Didnt like the color commentary. Just not my cup of tea. Has no build up and is too high strung.

[@Maroci222]

Is it AI generated voice? All time same raised annoing tone

[@lilpigboy]

lighten up bro, maybe find a different youtuber lol

[@drmikechess]

Brother this is my voice, I don't have the best mic yet so the sound quality is not yet perfect, I will improve this in the future. But yes it's the one and only Dr. Mike Chess, and I'll see YOU in the NEXT VIDEO!!! ❤❤❤

[@drmikechess]

@@lilpigboy You can't please everyone 😂

[@ryanstanley640]

You have one of the best voices I've seen on KZbin, like what?

[@Vagabond121212]

He's reading off a script written by chatgpt

[@xMrZaiZai]

Terrible commentary. Loads of fluff just to make the video longer than it should be.

[@pauloverdiflor1567]

Chess speaks for itself. - Brilliant mind. :)

[@ladakhiclover1085]

😮

[@khactrungthai3843]

Hayy

[@ramonmendez2282]

He is not on of the best with the pair of bishops HE IS THE BEST ONE in the world lol.

[@ShogiDojoLyon]

😃

[@glennmortel4385]

I stopped watching this guy! He is a motormouth!

[@David-j6e9n]

This video is better on mute.

[@Abc-tx4zr]

this game was terrible lol

[@ericjohnson6780]

Stop claiming it's all brilliant. Rxe3 ideas in the Averbakh are common. Put a black pawn on c5 and a white pawn on c4 and what do you have? An Averbakh. Jeezus. Shut up already.

[@santilanaknows5308]

show us your fide

[@esrasor]

@@santilanaknows5308 what does his fide matter, i would be more reserved to call something brilliant too, Rxe3 is a move any patzer could play for funzies.

[@josephsalmonte4995]

You chess virgins take all this far too seriously. It's a board game that you're not even playing 😂

[@bentorefrland5722]

@@esrasor and also the following strategy?

[@allanfifield8256]

​@@bentorefrland5722Not so.much

[@josephsalmonte4995]

A decent video but too much rambling. Watch Danya or Sammychess for tips lol

[@Cooper_Da_Snoopster]

Watched until you asked for a like. Later 😮

[@hans6422]

Talk less

[@lifeonsibuyanphilippines7212]

People enjoy and appreciate his commentary

[@amekh1956]

​@@lifeonsibuyanphilippines7212I do!

[@peterkirke5172]

why cant we watch with out u talking all the time .if ur that good play the game ur self

[@mouseman225]

That's literally what his channel is about. If you want to watch a game with no commentary, go find a channel with no commentary. What was the point of posting something like this? Why be so nasty towards another human being? Do better.

[@herrrmike]

🤡