Non Euclidean Geodesics!!

[@millionre]

Explained gracefully, I was interested in this topic and you explained it very well

[@J3385]

So interesting! 👏🏻

[@Just_a_Reflection]

The segue into a practicable life perspective at the close was legendary.

[@northernflyer]

I wasn't expecting the motivational outro! That was surprisingly comforting, haha, thanks!👍

[@DailyDivineGuidance]

I am using this as inspiration to study!! Sending you love!

[@rennovilela8774]

Very easy to follow, thanks!

[@AngelAlita84]

Oh hey! You are great, can you make more of this videos? Maybe about the black holes and stuff?

[@teztechnique3684]

Can you make a video on the trajectory of an apple when it falls through space time using drawings and animations?

[@AB-tt6qs]

Thank u so much. I understood it better. Pls make more videos using these kinds os simple ways:))

[@umrankoca3862]

You inspired me to apply to SSP (thank you so much) and believe it or not our TA Michael asked us the polar bear riddle for bragging rights

[@taktsing4969]

2:47 there are actually many places on earth you can do so.

[@davethesid8960]

Wdym?

[@taktsing4969]

@@davethesid8960 You can a do that when you are 1+(1÷2pi) away from the South Pole. You can also do that when you are1+(1÷(2×2pi)), 1+(1÷(3×2pi)), 1+(1÷(4×2pi)), ....... away from the South Pole.

[@deltalima6703]

Polar bears have black skin and white fur. The fur acts as a fiber optic cable to allow the black polar bear to absorb as much light as possible. What color is the polar bear?

[@moldvox]

Can we use non-euclidead and higher dimensional geometries to explain the cyclopean construction of ancient temple complexes?

[@edmund6392]

My 7 year old gifted math/science obsessed daughter loved watching this! Thanks!

[@dj1deckhousemusic674]

Any evidence of the 4th dimension and how time the concept can be bent?

[@haroonstutorials]

Good work 🎊🎉🎊🎊🎉🎊⭐✨⭐✨

[@t.x3.064]

Nice geodesics

[@GG-dx6cu]

Hang on, also special relativity (flat Spacetime) is non-euclidean

[@Ivan-mo1zv]

Parallel lines never cross. In every geometry. Be careful. In fact there are no parallel lines on the sphere.

[@theboombody]

What about latitude lines on a globe?

[@Ivan-mo1zv]

You're rigth. I confused the terms line and straight line, cause i'm italian.. and stupid. There are no parallel straight lines on the sphere.. now do you agree?

[@theboombody]

@@Ivan-mo1zv Anyone who can speak more than one language knows darn near twice as much as I do.

[@billmaghan]

Sometimes I wonder if straight lines exist.

[@Iitbombay-vn1vn]

Same

[@teztechnique3684]

liked it from India

[@ricardopedraca4159]

🥇sensacional 🤸🏆

[@vasilisthemelis9017]

Actually, there are infinite points on the globe where the photographer could be but no bears live there.

[@davethesid8960]

Wdym?

[@vasilisthemelis9017]

Imagine walking down towards the south pole, doing a circle around it and then walking back up where you started. There are infinite starting points where this can happen near the south pole and their locus is a circle. Furthermore, if you allow for multiple rounds over the south pole (walking on a tighter radius) there are infinite circles the photographer could have started from.

[@davethesid8960]

@@vasilisthemelis9017 Why infinitely many? The distance you have to walk determines the circle's circumference hence the latitude. The one extra (and the looping) is only true if you don't distinguish between edges. Like you could say you sow the path you cover, then you can't go back the same way. So the answer depends on the careful wording of the riddle.

[@vasilisthemelis9017]

As long as you do an integral amount of circles around the South pole you will go back to where you starter

[@davethesid8960]

@@vasilisthemelis9017 Sorry, but I don't get it. Oh, and one more thing: in the original riddle the fact that the photographer took a photo of bear implies that he did see a bear, however, there are no bears living near the South Pole.

[@TheSteveCTube]

Im working on curved treehouses @skyvalleysanctuary and found your video interesting!

[@NisseOhlsen]

Eva Smækker.

[@abhishekchatterjee7184]

Ok

[@-danR]

2021 360p

[@ghideu]

🫶🏻