Noobtube - Battlefield 2042

[@Krieger22FS]

The Angel crates really help with resupplying the 40mm APs, naturally the best source of them is to play Angel

[@Womtek1]

Every end screen of a game with Ravic, I think all the opponents can just hear the words of his favorite specialist...."Don't be sad, this is just how it works out sometimes"!

[@jfygt2623]

IGN 10/10 - "Tubetacular. "

[@max3eey]

That sounds like an illness

[@Jin-1337]

@@max3eey tuberculosis

[@poppyhaze6613]

this takes me back to playing CoD with the boys and one day we all changed our clan tag to [TOOB] and used only grenade launchers and rocket launchers. Never heard a madder lobby but we were winning.

[@RageToTheFinish]

Super satisfying. The 40mm AP is one of the best things just for the utility it offers. All the weapons with it are the best in the game. Hope it’s one of the few things brought into the next Battlefield!

[@Ravic]

I hope it's not something that feels like is required or needed for the next Battlefield. Referring to vehicle vs infantry balance and vehicle spam in BF2042.

[@communismisdead]

eh, it's a lot less effective when you're playing solo. most of the effectiveness of it in this video was a result of excellent teamwork. the vehicle balance in this game leaves a lot to be desired and if no one else is helping you're kind of screwed.

[@Walhor]

@@Ravic amen, it seems very one sided in 2042

[@Shyvorix]

​@Ravic Honestly it's exacerbated by the sheer fact most battlefield players nowadays are incompetent to the point they'll have all the tools required to kill multiple vehicles and still try and shoot at tanks with ARs ignoring the 4 recoiless rockets and at grenade they have thinking they're doing a good job. A big reason for all this is just simply the fact all the good people have ran off elsewhere. If they don't make the next battlefield feel amazing it's over for the franchise. Especially with Delta Force coming soon made by devs who actually give a fuck.

[@Ravic]

@@Shyvorix DICE tacked on the Class system onto a game they designed specifically for a Specialist system. They should have followed through and finished what they started instead of trying please the vocal minority that didn't really play the game. There was a lot of ways for everyone to try and deal with vehicles at launch but that went away whether because of nerfs or because of the Class system. Most of the nerfs were because vehicle players whined and DICE seems to be continuing their BF1 design to focus on vehicle players first and disregard the rest. Now you have to do even more or are forced to run certain things if you plan to actually play Battlefield and not hide in the infantry only maps or modes. You are much more limited than you were at launch and instead of it being simpler where everyone can equip a rocket launcher now people are more limited and they never got around to balancing it. That balance has been missing since launch. BC1, BC2, BF3, BF4 were all games where the vehicles were pretty easy to kill and didn't require multiple squads to pull off but those vehicles were still really strong in the right player's hands. That was when there was still an infantry first focus ( vehicles being second or another way to put it they were an added bonus ). It has nothing to do with "battlefield players nowadays", players were incompetent back then too but at least one or two players could still manage to deal with vehicles. Since BF1, BFV, and BF2042 vehicle's power creep has been scaling way out of control and now DICE are either going to have to reset ( like they have before ) or continue that path and increase that power creep for vehicles in which case no one is going to want to play the next Battlefield game or at least no one is going to want to play infantry in the next Battlefield game. It won't be over for the franchise. BF1 was the nail in the coffin for a huge portion of Battlefield players simply because it was WW1, same with BFV. The franchise is still going. Besides EA killed Medal of Honor already, Battlefield is the only thing they have filling that niche that isn't Apex.

[@random_letters]

lmao at the floating corpse at 7:18

[@merickful]

So good. Tubetastic!

[@Siciro]

More like Protube. Presently satisfying you were taking out vehicles.

[@krlosmontenegro3739]

03:33 Ese disparo durante el salto estuvo épico 😎👌🏽

[@EvanG529]

Now I need a supply crate squashing enemies compilation

[@maitogai1995]

Anyone else like the AK 5C? I feel like the vertical recoil is a little jumpy, but I like the damage it has

[@Huaie]

Nubetube is a classic. Nice video Ravan.

[@tink5488]

3:49 goddamn lightpoles, even an enemy of Ravics.

[@sabotage7369]

The grenade launcher attachment unlock grind is real

[@corypatterson5174]

Not for the scar, which is better in my opinion

[@Ty-nk4vk]

Them transitions be smooth. Nice editing! 👌

[@maximus4021]

I'm convinced Ravic is Battlefield

[@reynaldo_santos]

Raviccc and muzicccc you two is funny..

[@ArtzieFPS]

Hey ravic out of topic question but will you play Delta Force and make content on it when the game drop december 5th ?

[@Ravic]

Probably.

[@ArtzieFPS]

​@@Raviclooking forward to it love both either way :)

[@cybergeist8932]

1:47 dat transition tho. Now you're just showing off!

[@superbtrilogy5049]

4:11 Favorite clip

[@Gaunter_ODimm]

I see a lot of people using the ak5c lately is it the new best ar in the game?

[@Ravic]

Nope, just slightly newer than the rest since it was added later in the game's lifespan.

[@despeckt]

why a spent case comes out when you shoot the 40mm?

[@Ravic]

Finally someone else noticed. Likely the same reason barrel attachments in previous Battlefield games and BF2042 affect the underbarrel attachments like the underbarrel grenade launcher or shotgun. They are all treated as "firing a bullet/shell" from the gun by animation logic. Someone was probably lazy and no one at DICE was OCD enough to fix it or they possibly didn't notice it.

[@zbraDEVOzbra]

satisfying AF

[@lc582]

Foomppp - kaboooooom!!

[@LemonJuice2]

why dont you turn on damage numbers?

[@storfarbrorn489]

Probably because he thinks its annoying, which it is.

[@Ravic]

Because they weren't there at launch. They look out of place compared to damage numbers in previous Battlefield games.

[@ArtzieFPS]

​@@Ravicprevious bf damage numbers use score instead of exp i just hope the next bf use the same as bf 1 and 5 or just make the damage number as exp

[@beefybutter]

I was expecting some spicy infantry kills until i saw you take a fucking tank.😮

[@AudioClownHT]

What FOV are you using Ravic

[@Ravic]

74 in-game so ~106 horizontal.

[@giggles245]

been wantching your videos since battlefield 4 ambush during revive 05:21

[@robynchapman9288]

That first shot...

[@Rp707]

haha didnt think this would be against vehicles. nice!

[@major3336]

These videos are the only way I can enjoy this game. And still, I cringe at the fact of how much he is having to deal with that terrible mouse input. A real trooper still playing this game. Lol 👍👍👌

[@Miraak0Konahrik]

Honestly really unsure how I feel about a 40mm being able to kill armor vehicles so easily.. But to be fair after watching the Russian Badger's video about 2142 it feels like it's much less reliant on teamplay anyhow compared to previous games so maybe it fits in more.

[@Ravic]

Easily? How is it easy when I'm mainly only getting vehicle destroys on low health vehicles? I thought what I mentioned in the video description would be enough but I guess not. Just killing a tank alone with AP grenades would take a couple of minutes even if they stood still and never self-repaired because of how long it takes to resupply grenades. It may actually be faster to just die and respawn. This game is mostly the opposite from your description in that it takes a large portion of the team to take down vehicles especially when said vehicles are full where they have multiple repairers. However vehicles themselves tend to be less reliant of teamplay but that is because of game mechanics, etc. added in previous Battlefield games like BF1 and BFV where they no longer require support from their team to do well. Infantry players are still getting the short end of the stick.

[@Miraak0Konahrik]

@Ravic I see. Well maybe it just seemed that way to me because I exclusively saw people who are very good at the game play it so far and under specific circumstances.

[@paulygonz]

mus1CK's laugh is the best!

[@TheAAminat]

so satisfying :)

[@BEARTAC0S]

Omg it’s Jason Bourne

[@NaughtyShepherd]

That’s not noob-tubing that’s PRO-TUBING!

[@Darth_Victrus]

Nice. Server with 100% damage?

[@Ravic]

No, normal 128 player Conquest.

[@Darth_Victrus]

@@Ravic I may have phrased my question incorrectly. I was under the impression that it was 500% damage. Compared to other Battlefield games such as 3 or 4, this game appears to make it easier to destroy vehicles.

[@Ravic]

@@Darth_Victrus In Battlefield 2042 it's way harder to destroy vehicles than it is in BF3 or BF4. As I mention in the video description you're not seeing everything, having to resupply multiple times, waiting for their health to get lower from other vehicle damage or the occasional engineer. The tank around 50 seconds has a sliver of health left and it still takes two AP grenades to finish it off.

[@Darth_Victrus]

@@Ravic I've noticed you resupplying the weapon, and many of the vehicles destroyed are already damaged. This is in comparison to the M320 and GP-25, GP-30 LGV from Battlefield 3.

[@Darth_Victrus]

@@Ravic I have Battlefield 2042 for Xbox One and Series X, but I haven't tried out the 40mm AP ammunition yet.

[@CoDkiller1011]

Good gameplay

[@apdj94]

In this case AP stands for Anti-Pvehicle

[@hotf1ght3r93]

❤👍🔥

[@ScantilyCladPlatypus]

what on earth is the game world explanation on why a low velocity grenade can own a tank lol

[@jiuranynguyen4932]

he had more vehicle kill than i have with rpg

[@Qlekani]

It's all fun and games until you see your name in the kill feed LoL 🤣😂

[@imtrippedout]

before they put classes in 2042 angel was like every class in one now hes like 70% of everything. to me angel is still a broken character in this game.

[@mustangct4032]

Do you see Battlefield doing better than 2042 by releasing better games? Based on numbers we’ve had a downward trend of quality with the games starting with Battlefield 5. I’m not exactly sure what caused the development to go down but it’s disappointing. It seems as if they’re trying to make the game more like call of duty with specialist, and the movement even gives me a call of duty vibe. 2042 reminds me of an arcade game. I think we can all agree that most of the battlefield community liked the realism of the game so shifting to arcade style is causing a loss of players.

[@Ravic]

They copied, added, change things to mimic COD in multiple Battlefield games, it's been going on for a long time. It's annoying to some Battlefield players but it clearly grabs some of the COD crowd. The "quality" of Battlefield games dropped when they rebooted the franchise on the consoles with BC1. Then it continued to decline because they developed for multiple platforms instead of keeping it separate because it's cheaper to develop that way but it makes the quality of the game worse. Battlefield has never been realistic or had "realism". It has always been an arcade shooter even going back to BF1942. That is why mods had to be created back then just to make the game realistic. To me the launch version of BF2042 was better than BFV so I was fine with it however DICE kept caving to the vocal minority that weren't even going to play the game and changed so many things in the game it's in a much worse state than it was at launch so no I'd rate it around the same as BFV. Making something better than BFV isn't hard, sticking to it and following through though is apparently very hard. The real problem with more recent Battlefield titles is DICE's shift in focus on vehicles first instead of what they usually had which was an infantry first based design philosophy. Infantry first meant that the gameplay loop for infantry was good, solid, enjoyable for all and the vehicles were second. The vehicles were a bonus and not the main identity of the game. Since the back half of BF4 and continuing on through BF1, BFV, and BF2042 they've been heavily favoring vehicles and ignoring balance with regards to vehicles in Battlefield games which is one of the many reasons people tend to avoid BF1, BFV, and BF2042. The infantry gameplay loop needs to be better or more fun than the vehicle gameplay loop. The Battlefield games that have that have had stronger followings even if they didn't sell as many copies. So if DICE continue that direction with game design into the next Battlefield game and focus on vehicles first you can expect a similar result to BFV or BF2042. It might be slightly better but so far we've seen nothing to indicate they are changing directions.

[@mustangct4032]

@ as in realism I’m regarding sound design, destruction, and visuals. Weapons in 2042 don’t sound real and this takes away from the realism in my opinion. With it being a video game yes it’s still nice to have those arcade aspects because when it’s too realistic it’s not as enjoyable and doesn’t draw to as big of a crowd. But the more realistic approach to destruction is what drew me to battlefield over call of duty. It felt more like a game of war, now it’s as if the life has been sucked out of the games. Voice lines is another thing that comes to mind, if we look at the previous titles like BC2, BF3, BF4, and BF1 the the infantry had more life to them I just think new games lack that in most aspects. I pay attention to these because I believe these details play a big part in the overall experience of a game. As far as them focusing on vehicle first gameplay I don’t have much to say as I barely played 2042 and 5. I just hope that we can get a more engaging battlefield on the next release.

[@Ravic]

@@mustangct4032 Destruction? That isn't really a core Battlefield thing nor is it realistic especially in Battlefield games. Also all Frostbite engine Battlefield games have destruction so not sure why you'd bring it up unless this is one of those instances where "oh it's not the exact same destruction that was in that one Battlefield game I liked" or confusing destruction with levolution. There are tons of guns/weapons in BC2, BF3, and BF4 that don't sound real or realistic so not sure why you'd bring that up either. Unless you are mistaking "realism" with what audio movies and shows use in which case I can understand as people complained about BFV in that way because everything wasn't covered in the dark gray tint like it is in WW2 movies and shows even though it's more realistic to not have that tint. So you don't want realism you want Hollywood look and ambience which also makes sense because that was DICE's reasoning for why they heavily pushed that movie "Art Direction" tint and bad audio BF3.

[@mustangct4032]

@@Ravic I’m comparing to call of duty where you can’t destroy buildings like you can in Battlefield, so yes destruction plays a part and that includes levolution. I think saying it isn’t a core part of the BF franchise is a mistake because that’s what separated it for me. I think BF4 and BF1 did things very well with graphics and audio design. The weapons didn’t sound like toys. While it wasn’t perfect could you agree that BF4 has an overall better feel to the game? I respect different opinions so if you don’t agree that’s fine. Looking back at BF3 the graphics were good at the time but I can see its flaws. I can’t say the same for BF4 and BF1. BF1 graphics were peak in my opinion I was hoping that we would get BF1 graphics in a modern BF game which I thought 2042 was going to be but it just feels like it’s missing something.

[@Ravic]

@@mustangct4032 The graphical fidelity dropped some going from BF3 to BF4 if you take the time to look closely. BF4 at launch certainly played better and felt better for most of its lifespan but DICE caved to the vehicle players towards the later part of the game's lifespan and ruined the game so no I can't say it still feels like a better game. Especially considering all the many exploits and other issues they left in the game. I kind of roll my eyes whenever someone mentions BF1 graphics being peak or really good. Mainly because I streamed and made a lot of videos for the game but the people watching couldn't tell the difference between low or high quality graphical settings. To me that points to specific things appearing to look better in motion while everything else looked worse.

[@thelordofthetube01]

diabolical xD

[@rimondzzzz8765]

Deserver for playin vehicles

[@iC4e]

I don't know how you enjoy playing this extremely bad game. I can't even finish a minute of the video because of how bad this game is.

[@brandonwilson7887]

I can't watch your videos anymore. All the constant jumping is annoying to watch. You can tell the players who used to be halo gamers. They refuse to stop jumping all the time. It serves zero purpose in battlefield only slows you down. After 8 or 9 years of watching you I can't watch anymore. All the jumping is annoying to watch. Sorry bro

[@Ravic]

Not sure where you got that idea. Jumping while sprinting in BF3 is faster than just sprinting if you really did watch for that long you would have seen it many times in the BF3 videos. Sprint crouch slide jumping in BF2042 is faster than just sprinting in the game. It has nothing to do with Halo.

[@Ty-nk4vk]

Who tf cries over someone jumping in a video game? Seriously??? Just.. wow.