EAKINS VS RF4 trinocular microscope comparison

No video

EAKINS VS RF4 trinocular microscope comparison

Рет қаралды 10,258

Күн бұрын

For repair, please contact me by following the link in the channel ABOUT page.
Buy me a candy at paypal.me/tonynameless
Tools, schematics, boardview files etc are available here
drive.google.c...

Пікірлер: 83

@ion1984 6 ай бұрын

i love the way you got to the point right off the bat. hey, dont buy this. a lot of reviewers save that to the end, for viewer retention, but your idea is hey, i dont want ANYONE to get the idea im recommending this thing. very considerate and PRACTICAL, just like everything you do. have a great one!!

@natetechr 6 ай бұрын

Thank you for making a video on the RF4 microscope. I've been looking for a review for months.

@Ancientreapers 6 ай бұрын

Nice. Covering repair tools themselves. I like these kind of videos.

@pp3v42_g3h 6 ай бұрын

ok, I needed exactly this. Eakins has this new design too.

@FuNnY71818 6 ай бұрын

Need more videos like this, thanks

@vi683a Ай бұрын

You just saved me from wasting money on RF4

@brrrandamoactivo 23 күн бұрын

Me too

@Djazeiry 6 ай бұрын

thanks a lot dude , it was the right video on the right time , i was going to buy one of those microscopes , now i think i'll go for the mechanic MOS300-B11 , thank you very much

@skipdog77 6 ай бұрын

Bro why waste time on these when you can pickup the sweetest of them all! The NorthridgeFix Microscope! Have you heard? They are in stock and ready to ship today! If your order comes in this morning it will likely go out today! 🤣

@shiftctrlhack 6 ай бұрын

My Guy!!! I was going to post something like this!!!!

@TheCerovec 6 ай бұрын

Exactly,I just bought a second one,and I don't even do electronics repair

@DM16_ 6 ай бұрын

I bought the northbridge fix ring light and now I live a glare free life

@cili0ne 6 ай бұрын

@@DM16_Northfridge fix anti-glare light so good even the chinese copied it!

@MadEDoctor 6 ай бұрын

Yeah, the depth perception is for losers😂

@littleboot_ 6 ай бұрын

I'm looking for a trinocular microscope, thank you for making this review

@alinovslman5336 6 ай бұрын

Thank you.. For saving our money

@dukeofdream 6 ай бұрын

I'm using the black eakins for 3 years and i'm really happy with it ^^

@alanpang8223 6 ай бұрын

The double vision might not be the same for everyone. It sounds like the microscope has prismatic issues (or the user has poor accommodation/vergence flexibility). A lot of microscopes are set up for optical, infinity viewing but most people (especially young people) will naturally try to converge their eyes for a perceived close target. A bit like magic eye puzzles: some people can easily dissociate their convergence/accommodation, others can't...

@peterdeyanov5056 6 ай бұрын

I don't know if I provoked this video, but thanks for the information. No matter what the video is, I learn something useful every time. 👍

@rodolphemerveille4877 Ай бұрын

I confirm what you say. I didn’t saw any review before I bought mine and all is true

@dantheman3k Ай бұрын

Would love to see your current microscope and camera set up :)

@alexdrockhound9497 6 ай бұрын

ive been eyeing a microscope like this for examining mineral specimens.

@Fixforfixing 6 ай бұрын

Well I totally agree with you / I bought Kaisi 350S which I faced the same concern but I used to it and it is lot cheaper than AMtech and better than RF4. It is what it is man

@kikeJou Ай бұрын

You are comparing two trinoculars at that point is valid, but the eakins costs almost 4 times more than an RF4, you can't ask for much, on the other hand remember that these microscopes can be connected to an external display, maybe it would be uncomfortable to work with for some people, but I consider the resolution to be good and for someone who wants to start experimenting with trinoculars and learn the investment is worth it.

@zaytsevvaleriy 6 ай бұрын

looks like you got some faulty microscope. Try to test this unit with a coin. Place the coin so that it is completely within the sight of one eyepiece. Then look through another eyepiece and compare the area of the coin that is visible. There shouldn't be much difference, ideally the area occupied by the coin in the field of view should be identical for both eyepieces. If the difference is noticeable, then the optical axes are out of alignment and the microscope requires adjustment.

@northwestrepair 6 ай бұрын

Each eye is adjustable independently. The problem is not adjustment of the eye pieces focus but the angle at which you are looking through it.

@worroSfOretsevraH 6 ай бұрын

Maybe it got hit during shipping and some prizm moved out of place inside. Or bad alignment from factory...

@zaytsevvaleriy 6 ай бұрын

@@northwestrepair you didn't understand what I said. forget about focusing. Check the field of view of both eyepieces with coin.

@meljohnston5829 6 ай бұрын

I've just bought the rf4. It's really good. The one I have is identical to the eakins and very heavy. Maybe you have a lower standard model or a copy of a copy? :)

@abdulwaqiaabdulai6828 4 ай бұрын

Which model do u have

@kentstansberry9748 6 ай бұрын

Thanks for your ethics.👍

@mashundiy 6 ай бұрын

I have mechanic mc75t. Very popular in India for mobile repair. I wonder how it will compare to more expensive ones

@computersrepaircotesaint-l7407 6 ай бұрын

you just saved me 200 cdn. I have the same eakins as yours and my problem for is when putting the 0.5 lens its way to high for me to work, Thought this one will give me 2 centimeters less in Hight

@andrikurniawan531 6 ай бұрын

i use rf4 blower, pretty good and cheap, but for microscope buy from company that fokus at making microscope or other lens related product

@krisiluttinen 4 ай бұрын

When you looked through that RF4 without a barlow lense, did you notice the components/subject appears way too tall? Like everything that is small looks deeper and taller than it should be. Is that normal? does it happen on the other model Eakins oem? When attaching the barlow lense this problem seems to get corrected. This is happening on my new RF4 RF6565PRO head.

@XPbIM3 6 ай бұрын

Those two are so called "stereo optical microscopes" they are intended to provide a stereoscopic and slightly magnified picture. Not all of the microscopes are stereoscopic, but for microelectronics rebuild works stereoscopic ones are commonly used. There are basically two common optical schemas for building stereo microscope : the Grinu and the Abbe. They are different in manner how they organise optical flow. The one where optical channels are inclied - seems to be Grinu, the second one seems to be Abbe. Abbe microscopes sometimes perfomrs better, especcially with trinocular and digital camera attached. The propoblems You are desribing with bad parallax could be just the cause of this particular microscope is poorly made...

@sairus6055 6 ай бұрын

If you have double image probably microscope need adjusting (maybe it was bushet at shipping). I have AmScope 7X-45X Simul-Focal small focus lost appear on ends of zooming range (it usual case for low price microscopes).

@MichaelGiacomelli 6 ай бұрын

I bought an RF4 recently and they shipped it in an unpadded box with almost nothing to protect it all the way from China. When I opened it the mirrors were completely loose and badly cracked in the bottom of the package and the head was broken almost in half. The gearing was also screwed up. I took it apart, realigned it and then glued the mirrors back into place and while it was a gigantic pain in the ass, it does now actually work pretty well. Compared to my Amscope trinocular head the eye piece quality isn't obviously different (or at least I didn't notice anything obvious worse), although the build quality is much cheaper/fragile. I do not see the same problems you mention (at least now that I've rebuilt it), so I think yours might have been only less damaged than mine and something inside is out of alignment. If you want to open it up, you might be able to fix it. That said, from my point of view packaging it like they did was just crazy. It is a microscope, and one made of plastic no less. They need to charge a few dollars more and package it in a way that it'll survive shipping.

@Rmm1722 6 ай бұрын

Good work 💯👏

@dannysai6258 6 ай бұрын

hi guys my gpu doesnt show display , but turning on and i checked and ram and changed cmos battery , hdmi cable is working well. can anyone help

@SebastiaanSwinkels 6 ай бұрын

I'd recommend a Mantis, but those have no tri heads afaik.

@fu1r4 6 ай бұрын

What is the reason for two eyepieces, will the depth vision be better than if you had a monitor to look at?

@jemaeche08 15 күн бұрын

my order arrive yesterday (rf4)after assemble i got this problem.😢

@GameBacardi 6 ай бұрын

Good review 👍🏻👨🏻

@teddp 6 ай бұрын

Just playing devil's advocate here but have you considered that it is a problem that only you could have? I mean have you put anyone else to try and see if this microscope works for their eyes?

@matthewrobinson150 6 ай бұрын

hey bro rf 4 is a copy of soptop szn71 , which im assuming they failed hard at ... if you want best microscope of Chinese one buy soptop szn71 . expensive buy worth the price can do iphone cpu jumpers etc

@RicardoSiul 6 ай бұрын

The double vision has nothing to do with the angle of the eyepieces. The problem is with the lenses at the bottom that needs adjustment.

@northwestrepair 6 ай бұрын

So it comes like that from the factory ? Either way, the angle of the eye pieces is terrible. It does not line up with my eyes and rubber padding is all at the wrong angle. On the other hand, they have technicians with cross vision adjusting these lol 😂😂

@Djazeiry 6 ай бұрын

@@northwestrepair lol nice one 😆😆

@BarbaraDavis-e7y Күн бұрын

Lisandro Mountains

@JoaoBatista-hk2iu 6 ай бұрын

Muito boa 🎉

@dantheman3k Ай бұрын

What store on aliexpress did you buy your eakins microscope ?

@northwestrepair Ай бұрын

Eakins official I think.

@dantheman3k Ай бұрын

@@northwestrepair Thanks, i have 2 options Eakins Store or Eakins microscope store can't decide :)

@sqrl1980 6 ай бұрын

did you buy em at Northridgefix ? ;3

@miguelfernandez2325 6 ай бұрын

Send those to Alex as a present anonymously. LMAO

@kentstansberry9748 6 ай бұрын

@RcFixer 6 ай бұрын

Nice toy

@giginet4625 6 ай бұрын

I hate using these type of microscope,for me works direct hdmi lenses conected to monitor,i can sit normaly and watch the monitor completly free,at the beginning its a little 😊😊😊hard but with time you get used to it

@fabian11235 6 ай бұрын

Thinking about switching too. The depth perception is so nice though. But feeling like I am Quasimodo after two hours is not.

@Unsocial200 6 ай бұрын

That's what you get for not buying NF microscope combined with NF Anti-glare light. 🤣🤣

@LilMissMurder3409 6 ай бұрын

May ee chai naaah

@enteranon3342 6 ай бұрын

Vevor Microscope is cheaper and better

@defeusers 6 ай бұрын

just bough rf4 6565pro and its not feel like ur review

@kobs9636 29 күн бұрын

i bought a rf-6565 too and i agree with double vision. and i cant seem to focus both eyepieces at the same time. i think its a factory defect thing or the lenses inside were shifted during shipping. anyway, i returned it and switched to rf-6555 Pro Max instead and it works perfectly with continous zoom like they advertized.