Airplane Designations Explained

  Рет қаралды 2,432,508

Not What You Think

Not What You Think

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 3 000
@NotWhatYouThink
@NotWhatYouThink 3 жыл бұрын
Get Manscaped! Get 20% OFF + Free Shipping with code *THINK20* at mnscpd.com/NotWhatYouThink
@danielaltamar8212
@danielaltamar8212 3 жыл бұрын
bruh why did u choose this sponsor
@PartsandStuff
@PartsandStuff 3 жыл бұрын
I thought BUFF was Big Ugly Fat Fellow
@luccavanopdorp9755
@luccavanopdorp9755 3 жыл бұрын
Learned something new today! Awesome content!👍
@osow5081
@osow5081 3 жыл бұрын
Buff is back Yeeeeeeeeeh
@osow5081
@osow5081 3 жыл бұрын
Dont u dare get mobile games next please dont
@decrobyron
@decrobyron 3 жыл бұрын
Most dedicated sponsor commercial content ever.
@somegdplayer4039
@somegdplayer4039 3 жыл бұрын
@OPEN PAGE,,,,, 👇🤗 bot
@phoenix0166
@phoenix0166 3 жыл бұрын
@OPEN PAGE,,,,, 👇🤗 bruh
@HandyManDan723
@HandyManDan723 3 жыл бұрын
For real, and that segue was awesome!
@phooeyjr6545
@phooeyjr6545 3 жыл бұрын
@@DingDingTheKZbinBuddy its japanese not chinese (im pretty sure)
@derrickstorm6976
@derrickstorm6976 3 жыл бұрын
Not really
@math1ass10
@math1ass10 3 жыл бұрын
This has to be the smoothest sponsor transition ive ever seen.
@MrVayolence
@MrVayolence 3 жыл бұрын
Legendary as the pilot who landed the plane
@williebrort
@williebrort 3 жыл бұрын
And the sponsored part was just as good as the rest of the video. Genius! I usually skip sponsored parts, but this is just brilliantly made.
@Black-Sun_Kaiser
@Black-Sun_Kaiser 3 жыл бұрын
True ,it was brilliant
@mi4936
@mi4936 3 жыл бұрын
Heh, "smooth".
@geobanks2321
@geobanks2321 3 жыл бұрын
I agree with you so much I couldn't believe that really just happened and I didn't skip
@jamesdelius
@jamesdelius 2 жыл бұрын
There actually was an A-4 Skyhawk, A-5 Vigilante, A-6 Intruder, and A-7 Corsair II. The AV-8 is exactly where it should be.
@komalpoddar9kp
@komalpoddar9kp 2 жыл бұрын
Point
@TheStig_TG
@TheStig_TG 2 жыл бұрын
That would be wrong on the official system as A is pure attack while AV is attack with vtol capability
@LordSmallest
@LordSmallest 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheStig_TG soo, F-35B?? It has VTOL capability too, well, specifically STOVL but it still counts because STOVL stands for Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing while VTOL stands for Vertical Take-Off and Landing
@shxckrxcket
@shxckrxcket Жыл бұрын
@@LordSmallest The F-35 itself isn't VTOL capable, since only the B model is. The base A, and the modified C dont have VTOL.
@TerrorOmnibus
@TerrorOmnibus Жыл бұрын
So is there an A9?
@hazmatt3250
@hazmatt3250 3 жыл бұрын
The “K” for tankers represents “Kerosene” to clear up any confusion. “S” can also mean “Spy/Surveillance” in the case of the SR-71.
@Norsilca
@Norsilca 3 жыл бұрын
Is S supposed to mean that or is that another instance of misdirection like the U-2?
@mindlessgreen
@mindlessgreen 3 жыл бұрын
This made me look up the difference between Surveillance and Reconnaissance.
@TheObsidianX
@TheObsidianX 3 жыл бұрын
I feel like I’ve heard it said they were supposed to call it the RS-71 for recon space plane but flipped it because it sounds better as SR.
@taneeshajackson1817
@taneeshajackson1817 3 жыл бұрын
@@TheObsidianX Strategic Reconnaisance
@jeffreyc2074
@jeffreyc2074 3 жыл бұрын
@@TheObsidianX It was originally officially RS but was read backwards when introduced. To prevent embarrassment of correcting the mistake of those on top it was officially changed SR
@xanfsnark
@xanfsnark 3 жыл бұрын
So what I'm hearing is that it would be technically possible to make a prototype special electronic mission version of an electronic mission helicopter designated YEEH-4A!
@TheMachineGod966
@TheMachineGod966 3 жыл бұрын
How does this not exist yet
@Willon
@Willon 3 жыл бұрын
This man needs a Nobel Prize
@edo-san
@edo-san 3 жыл бұрын
@@Willon This man needs funding
@crosshairs19
@crosshairs19 3 жыл бұрын
I want this to happen
@aldreenbautista2375
@aldreenbautista2375 3 жыл бұрын
*pentagon wants to know your location
@aerohk
@aerohk 2 жыл бұрын
Learned more about warplanes in a short video than I did in 7 years in the Air Force.
@haparcheledupwar
@haparcheledupwar Жыл бұрын
Lol
@jaumeecs
@jaumeecs 3 жыл бұрын
Ngl, the intro for the sponsor was smooth af. *revives avocado*
@jonachamp3946
@jonachamp3946 3 жыл бұрын
Check the likes
@heisenbergw.w8247
@heisenbergw.w8247 7 ай бұрын
@@jonachamp3946 whats MQ nine? M is modified mission and it has no mission at alll?
@TheLastArbiter
@TheLastArbiter 3 жыл бұрын
Prior to this designation system, P primarily referred to “Pursuit” aircraft (basically fighters) such as the P-38, P-40, and P-51
@ironicrbx
@ironicrbx 3 жыл бұрын
thats cool
@Splashdavap
@Splashdavap 3 жыл бұрын
Correct
@nickfury1279
@nickfury1279 3 жыл бұрын
Back then, F was used to refer to unarmed reconnaissance variants of pursuit planes (the F-5 was a P-38 with its weapons removed and replaced with cameras for photo-recon purposes, the F-6 was an unarmed photo-recon variant of the P-51)
@nickwhite2582
@nickwhite2582 3 жыл бұрын
@@nickfury1279 At least, in Air Force use. In the Navy, F was the fighter designation. and they even had an identifier for who made the plane. For instance, the second F in F4F Wildcat meant that it was a Grumman design. M= General Motors, D=Douglas, C=Curtis, Y= Consolidated, F=Grumman, U=Vought, A=Brewster.
@johanrunfeldt7174
@johanrunfeldt7174 3 жыл бұрын
The Navy system meant that a plane could have different designations, even inside the Navy. An example is the last variant of the Grumman Wildcat, which was named F4F-8 if it was manufactured by Grumman and FM-2 if it was manufactured by GM's Eastern Aircraft division.
@BladedAngel
@BladedAngel 2 жыл бұрын
Finally, I found a Not What You Think Video Where it ended up being Exactly What I Thought.
@mk4_supra339
@mk4_supra339 7 ай бұрын
You are here?
@ucankushincorporations1318
@ucankushincorporations1318 2 ай бұрын
fell off
@CookieShepsky
@CookieShepsky 3 жыл бұрын
This opened my eyes after so many years of not realizing the letters and numbers had any function and thinking they were just "names" given by manufacturing Thank you so much, my life has become better
@firstletterofthealphabet7308
@firstletterofthealphabet7308 3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, most manufacturers don't know their MDS designations until they actually receive funding from the military.
@phoenix1782
@phoenix1782 3 жыл бұрын
same
@phoebespengler8019
@phoebespengler8019 3 жыл бұрын
@@firstletterofthealphabet7308 MD=mexican dream
@biponacci
@biponacci 3 жыл бұрын
Many manufacturers also have their own company designation for military designs outside of the USAF tri service designation, like the P-8 Poseidon being a 737-800ERX, or the Lockheed C-141 being the L-300. This is mostly just the case when they’re developed from a civilian aircraft (like the P-8) or if the manufacturer intends/intended to sell the aircraft as a civilian model later (like the L-300). What’s even more interesting is the aircraft from foreign countries that use similar naming systems and completely ignore some of the conventions, like the Embraer C-390, which just so happens to use a numerical value three times that of the C-130 it replaces with Brazil.
@fartboy258
@fartboy258 3 жыл бұрын
Not liking this comment to keep 420
@keanusw3369
@keanusw3369 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I was also researching this myself here is the data I observe from military aircraft A= Attacker B= Bomber C= Cargo/Transport D= Dive Bomber? E= Electronic equipped F= Fighter G= Glider/Permanenly Grounded H= Search and rescue I= (I can't find this one) J= Special test, temporary K= Aerial refueling plane L= Laser equiped M= Military Mission N= Special test, permanent O= Observation P= Pursuit/Patrol Q= Long range drone/unmanned aircraft R= Reconnaissance S= Scout/Anti-submarine T= Training U= Utility V= VTOL W= Weather reconnaissance X= Experimental Y= Prototype Z= Planning
@_TheRealMud
@_TheRealMud 3 жыл бұрын
Actually pretty accurate, but it can get a bit more complex. I also feel like talking about stuff so this will be a bit (extremely) long. in no particular order: D actually designates drone control systems, which aren't aircraft, although drone director aircraft are allowed as well under the same designation. H can designate search and rescue, medivac and just helicopter (AH-64 is attack helicopter 64, UH-60 is utility helicopter 64 and so on), helicopter of course being the most common. E doesn't simply mean electronically equipped as that would be all aircraft, but rather special electronic mission, usually early warning, radar jamming or something else like that. F does mean fighter, but the most common mistake I see is people assuming that is the aircrafts primary job, in reality aircraft that only have air to air as a secondary defense while primarily being for ground strike can also have this designation. M means multi mission, I'm not sure what you mean by "military mission" tbh, thats just all of them, it also used to mean missile carrier, and then mine countermeasure, those were both dropped when the navy stopped having use for them. W does in fact mean weather reconnaissance, but it will not be used alone, always with another letter (generally C, just like tankers) (example: WC-130). X means experimental, but also aircraft designed to carry out experiments not directly related to the aircraft (flying laboratories would receive the X designation). Z does mean planned when used as a status, just as J and N are used, however Z also used to mean lighter than air, to my knowledge this is no longer recognized. L does mean laser equipped, but this was dropped quite rapidly, with the failure of the YAL-1 airborne laser aircraft, it may come back now that lasers are coming back as well, it also means cold weather equipped, although thats basically all aircraft now. V in addition to VTOL/STOL (The OV-10 for example was a short takeoff observation aircraft) means VIP transportation when appended to another letter, now exclusive to presidential (and by transfer the vice president) transportation aircraft, the VC-25, the presidential 747, is an example of such a designation. I in fact does not exist as a designation, not even retired or rarely used like many of them, which is why you couldn't find it. Of course, the greatest of them all, P, it is only used as Patrol now, but it used to be used for Pursuit, as you listed, which was generally a fighter or interceptor. A will likely be retiring soon actually as its quite obsolete, every year for quite some time now the USAF has submitted plans to retire the A-10, the senate has denied these plans every time, it will likely take the aircraft seeing serious combat to convince the senate to approve its retirement as the USAF has been trying to do. The video also stated that the A-10 is the lone example of the A designation, this is not entirely true, excluding aircraft designated AC (AC-130 is quite a famous example), the A-29 Super Tucano currently holds this designation as well, and is possibly going to be one of the last to hold the designation, as it is the only fully modernized dedicated ground strike aircraft Anyway, I'm done pretending to know anything and talking too much.
@DFX2KX
@DFX2KX 3 жыл бұрын
@@_TheRealMud the A designation and it's retirement or not with the Hog is indicative of the strange place the military often finds itself. I expect the A-10 to eventually be retired purely from running out of parts. But Fighter/Attack aircraft are both expensive and fairly fragile. So something will come along that's more resistant to ground fire for that role when a whole air strike isn't needed. Seeing an AQ wouldn't be all that surprising now that I think about it (Ground-Attack drone)
@2020Max1
@2020Max1 3 жыл бұрын
You have to consider that prior to 1962 there was no real standard naming or numbering convention for aircraft. Which is why you have aircraft like the TBF-Avenger, SBD-Dauntless, the F4U Corsair and the F4F Wildcat. And why there is no real consistency between the numbering of the "P" aircraft (P-51, P-38 P-47 P-61 etc). Interestingly enough there is a similar naming convention in place for Naval Ships as well. CV, CVA, CVE, CVL, CVN are all designations for aircraft carriers. CC, CA, CL, CG are designations for cruisers, and DD, DDE, DDR, DDL DDG were used as designations for destroyers.
@raikbarczynski6582
@raikbarczynski6582 3 жыл бұрын
I would most likely be Interceptor
@Commrade-DOGE
@Commrade-DOGE 3 жыл бұрын
So you could have a aircraft named the YEET-69
@F.B.I.Agency
@F.B.I.Agency 2 жыл бұрын
I love the fact that i spend hours watching things about army and learning more and more.But when it comes to study i cant even study for 5 mins.
@whoseni4496
@whoseni4496 3 жыл бұрын
I choked on my water when they talked about the sponsor
@cygamers7546
@cygamers7546 3 жыл бұрын
I was like, bro is this even a true sponsor?!
@singularityraptor4022
@singularityraptor4022 3 жыл бұрын
Water isn't the only thing that you will choke on 😏
@bruuuuuuuuh8333
@bruuuuuuuuh8333 3 жыл бұрын
@@singularityraptor4022 wasnt able to choke, too small. 1 star review
@superdupersketchy4524
@superdupersketchy4524 3 жыл бұрын
@@bruuuuuuuuh8333 What if he was talking about something else 🤨
@Boe_Jidens_Hair_Sniffing
@Boe_Jidens_Hair_Sniffing 3 жыл бұрын
Small correction: Tsar Bomba was actually only 50MT, not 100. It was changed in the late stages of development in order to give the pilots who dropped it a whopping 50% chance of survival versus the certain death of dropping a 100MT. Also because even the Russians knew 100MT was just too much lol
@N330AA
@N330AA 3 жыл бұрын
Yes they replaced the U238 tamper with lead.
@BenedictF79B
@BenedictF79B 3 жыл бұрын
Imagine they didn't make the bomb in drop test not 50MT
@landchannel7688
@landchannel7688 3 жыл бұрын
@@BenedictF79B even after 50MT explosion scientists were scared that it caused irreversible environmental catastrophe, so...
@Jason-xc1qi
@Jason-xc1qi 3 жыл бұрын
At least they didn’t do a Castle Bravo mistake 🤔😉
@RaptorTroll360
@RaptorTroll360 3 жыл бұрын
IIRC a very large percentage of the blast energy went straight up into the upper layers of the atmosphere, making the bomb less efficient, in it's effects on ground targets, than the same amount of fission material/effort being used in several smaller nukes.
@dallasmckim4370
@dallasmckim4370 2 жыл бұрын
That was honestly such a slick transition to the sponsor commercial
@OrbInDaFrame
@OrbInDaFrame 3 жыл бұрын
5:21 That handshake is what I strive for
@UltraMagaFan
@UltraMagaFan 3 жыл бұрын
YEH-60B is a prototype (Y) electronic warfare (E) helicopter (H) equipped with a high precision radar antenna mainly designed to detect moving targets on a battlefield and datalink the location of them to army ground stations (stand off target acquisition). It’s based off of an A model Blackhawk which is the 60th designated helicopter (-60) and it’s the second prototype of the YEH variant. (B) The first one (YEH-60A) having a radar that was susceptible to ice. They fixed the icing problem in the B model.
@preetindermanesh
@preetindermanesh 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@joeigmz8564
@joeigmz8564 3 жыл бұрын
so basically it has a radar almost ice proof that can strategically see enemy forces on the ground and its base H is a black hawk
@SylasTheGreat
@SylasTheGreat 3 жыл бұрын
What you said isn't unclass...
@richardb7315
@richardb7315 3 жыл бұрын
based
@samo4648
@samo4648 3 жыл бұрын
Cant tell if that last part is real or a reference to iron man
@lowtiersupport5530
@lowtiersupport5530 Жыл бұрын
These puns are kind of good, not gonna lie. Thanks for explaining the letter in this video!
@BlessedSeal
@BlessedSeal 3 жыл бұрын
From my knowledge and experience, a-10 warthog when flying, is not as loud as you think, it’s as loud as a propeller plabe
@Cat-y4w
@Cat-y4w 3 жыл бұрын
That makes sense the a-10 is about as fast and around the same altitude as a ww2 plane
@tastytoasttaste1402
@tastytoasttaste1402 3 жыл бұрын
yeah but it's the plabe
@belluh-1huey102
@belluh-1huey102 3 жыл бұрын
@OPEN PAGE,,,,, 👇🤗 SHUT UP GO SOMEWHERE ELSE, YOU DON'T CHAT ABOUT THAT HERE! WE TALK ABOUT WEAPONS HERE.
@StarscreamX404
@StarscreamX404 3 жыл бұрын
BRRRRRRRRRRT
@tastytoasttaste1402
@tastytoasttaste1402 3 жыл бұрын
@@StarscreamX404 boiiii a10 goes brrrrrrt brrrrrrrrrrrrt brrrrrrrt
@OFelix-fo5hs
@OFelix-fo5hs 3 жыл бұрын
"they can hit a target with a great degree of precision" Shows a clip of a pilot missing every single shot Gotta love the humor of this channel 😂
@daddysempaichan
@daddysempaichan 3 жыл бұрын
Hey, they did hit with great precision, just not great accuracy lol.
@justme2296
@justme2296 3 жыл бұрын
@@daddysempaichan lmao
@Aniyah-CHG
@Aniyah-CHG 3 жыл бұрын
Tbf that's super accurate by airstrike standards.
@johanrunfeldt7174
@johanrunfeldt7174 3 жыл бұрын
It was just a warning shot.
@NoRacingLine
@NoRacingLine 3 жыл бұрын
LMFAO the accuracy is just too bad for him, maybe just a small angle of precision will add accuracy maybe LMFAO the humor is so good
@jsstt
@jsstt 2 жыл бұрын
honestly... this video let me speechless... simply amazing detail and information... amazing... truly amazing
@danialkarim9038
@danialkarim9038 3 жыл бұрын
YEH-60B meaning: Y is for Prototype then E is for Electronic, H is for helicopter, 60 the 60th design or for a name and B for the second series.
@firstcynic92
@firstcynic92 3 жыл бұрын
D: drone H: search & rescue, not necessarily helicopters L: cold weather as well as laser Q: unmanned V: vip transport W: weather recon
@silentdagger1166
@silentdagger1166 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@______1043
@______1043 3 жыл бұрын
Isnt a drone unmanned?
@benjaminking2513
@benjaminking2513 3 жыл бұрын
@@______1043 AFAIK, drones are controlled by operators on the ground and UAV's can be self-flying... not sure though. Could be the other way around
@atlas-3541
@atlas-3541 3 жыл бұрын
Hmmm V22 Osprey
@firstcynic92
@firstcynic92 3 жыл бұрын
@@atlas-3541 Was misnamed. It should have the C designator as it's a cargo aircraft.
@patrickmulligan7296
@patrickmulligan7296 2 жыл бұрын
A lot of the numbers that are "skipped" actually come from the experimental phase. multiple airframes will be developed by multiple manufactures and compete for the single slot that will actually be used. An example would be the F-22. During the X-22 days, there was also a X-23. the two companies competed for the bid with the USAF. Developed similar aircraft that would fill the role that was needed. And the USAF selected the one they deemed best. In this case, the X-23 was basically doomed from poor original design and changing the entire airframe mid experimental stage. And Fighters with really high numbers are not actual fighters. They are aircraft that have filled the funding for a fighter but the aircraft actually has a very different role. The F-111 is a great example, as that aircraft was basically a flying radar jammer and sub hunter. Or the F-117 which is a small bomber designed for precision strikes and small targets.
@dhavenmande4632
@dhavenmande4632 3 жыл бұрын
designed to detect moving targets on the battlefield and downlink the information to an Army ground station.YEH-60B.
@random-b-i2480
@random-b-i2480 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah but why YEH-60B
@David-qp9bq
@David-qp9bq 3 жыл бұрын
I love his long videos, I want to see a 40 minute documentary next pls
@volatile100
@volatile100 2 жыл бұрын
Something cool about the U-2, since there's such a limited number, there is a public list of pilots that show their first flight dates, and nicknames. Also, the pilots got to keep some of their stuff; my dad kept his gloves and they're sitting in a glass box above me in display.
@riothero313
@riothero313 2 жыл бұрын
Nice, my dad gave me shitty genetics and cancer.
@elliotgillum
@elliotgillum Жыл бұрын
@@riothero313 Still alive?
@riothero313
@riothero313 Жыл бұрын
@@elliotgillum lol yeah, after 39-40 months of a chemo clinical trial. Unless this is my digital immortality and my brain was uploaded somewhere along the way.
@elliotgillum
@elliotgillum Жыл бұрын
@@riothero313 Well either way, glad to hear it. I suppose if you can't tell the difference, then who cares.
@danielkot9532
@danielkot9532 3 жыл бұрын
OK that was a clean transaction to the sponsor 10/10
@dab_yeetus
@dab_yeetus 3 жыл бұрын
Transition
@danielkot9532
@danielkot9532 3 жыл бұрын
@@dab_yeetus thx
@drunkzilla3522
@drunkzilla3522 3 жыл бұрын
Clean transportation 😩👉
@LetsTakeWalk
@LetsTakeWalk 3 жыл бұрын
Now I know why the AC130 is designated that way. It’s a modified mission of Attack while it’s basic mission is Carrier. In this case it carries a whole lot of cannons to fire upon the enemy.
@forsaturn4629
@forsaturn4629 2 жыл бұрын
cargo
@zidniafifamani2378
@zidniafifamani2378 2 жыл бұрын
"Make sure to hit anything that doesn't have flare on" ("Church doesn't have flare on") *load 105mm* "No Johnson, no, no, no!..." *105mm artillery fire sound* "Here he go..."
@gd.ritter
@gd.ritter 2 жыл бұрын
F-117 is also a well-known exception to the rule. It's primarily a bomber but because of its stealth characteristics, they needed fighter pilot type skill sets to fly it successfully so gave it an F designation to attract the right sort of interest.
@st3althyone
@st3althyone 3 жыл бұрын
You forgot some of the most legendary aircraft, the A-12 and its big brother the SR-71 “Blackbird”; both were reconnaissance aircraft and deserve a special place in aviation history.
@riothero313
@riothero313 2 жыл бұрын
I think the SR-71 is my favorite machine ever built.
@coltoncollingwood650
@coltoncollingwood650 9 ай бұрын
or the F-117 "Nighthawk"
@absolutelynothing9394
@absolutelynothing9394 7 ай бұрын
Ah yes, Attack aircraft 12. Ah yes (x2) anti submarine reconnaissance 71
@haberjon00o
@haberjon00o 7 ай бұрын
The a12 and sr71 are related, aren't they?
@IamSuperman154
@IamSuperman154 3 жыл бұрын
The concept of this video is so original. I get to see many unique and original concepts in your videos. Thank you for your hard work to keep us entertained and teaching us so many things.
@NotWhatYouThink
@NotWhatYouThink 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much!
@ThatBeTheQuestion
@ThatBeTheQuestion 2 жыл бұрын
I have seen a LOT of Manscaped adds. This was easily the best.
@evo3s75
@evo3s75 3 жыл бұрын
13:22 the Tsar Bomba was 100 megaton but the soviet engineers were really worried about how much damage it would do so they halved it to 50 megaton
@BJCulpepper
@BJCulpepper 2 жыл бұрын
The U.S. Army Air Service used the term “P” for pursuit aircraft, adapted from the French Avion de Chasse for pursuit or hunt airplane. After World War II, the term fighter was formally adopted by the USAF with the designator “F.
@TheMemeDynamics
@TheMemeDynamics 3 жыл бұрын
My military knowledge has increased. Also, YEH-60B means it is a prototype electronic warfare avionics installation helicopter 60 model B. So basically it is the second model of a prototype electronic warfare helicopter. Used for electronical warfare
@UltraMagaFan
@UltraMagaFan 3 жыл бұрын
That’s vague. We know it’s an electronic warfare helicopter but what does it do? Electronic warfare is used for many things.
@cygamers7546
@cygamers7546 3 жыл бұрын
@@UltraMagaFan do you accept that this video teaches us things that school will never even say about
@j30n1l8
@j30n1l8 3 жыл бұрын
YEaH-bOB
@iruncities
@iruncities 3 жыл бұрын
@@UltraMagaFan you dont recognize it from independce day? they have it fixed with lights to try and communicate to aliens :P
@9skyhigh5
@9skyhigh5 3 жыл бұрын
the YEH-60B was mainly used to detect enermys on the battlefeild
@geneticallymodified7775
@geneticallymodified7775 3 жыл бұрын
13:18 The actual blast yield of the Tsar Bomba was more likely around 50-60MT of TNT. The initial design had 100MT in mind, however in the end they didnt utilize the full capability.
@amurdera4409
@amurdera4409 3 жыл бұрын
Ok you no best don’t you
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III 3 жыл бұрын
@@amurdera4409 Da fuq??
@regalblade8171
@regalblade8171 2 жыл бұрын
They did so because the pilots were basically dead if they dropped 100mt tsar, but with 50 or 60 mt they faced smaller chances of dying
@kamovka8003
@kamovka8003 2 жыл бұрын
You know it's powerful if the Soviets lower its blast yield
@1Xenobyte
@1Xenobyte 2 жыл бұрын
best sponsor ad ive ever seen
@noblesicks
@noblesicks 3 жыл бұрын
If you actually read into the F-15 with the wing ripped off the pilot didn’t know the wing was ripped off he said if he saw the wing was gone he would’ve ejected right then and there but he didn’t know he thought it just started a listing
@payton9745
@payton9745 3 жыл бұрын
* The tsar bomba was actually only 50 megatons not 100. the russians could have made it 100 but were scared that it woukd be too big
@krxzovic
@krxzovic 3 жыл бұрын
Also it wouldn't fit Tu-95, largest bomber in soviet air force
@erenjaeger772
@erenjaeger772 3 жыл бұрын
Its dangerous if it made the Russians scared
@ThePppp89
@ThePppp89 3 жыл бұрын
@@krxzovic That doesn't make sense, the yield was lowered by replacing fissile material with a tamper, not by making it smaller.
@somedudes6455
@somedudes6455 3 жыл бұрын
What the fuck? What does that have to do with this?
@payton9745
@payton9745 3 жыл бұрын
@@somedudes6455 bro he mentioned in the video that the tsar bomba had 100 megaton but it was actually obly 50. We are Politely correcting him
@vuIent
@vuIent 2 жыл бұрын
I never knew this, and now i get it, and its actually pretty simple lol.
@Mindwipe96
@Mindwipe96 3 жыл бұрын
OH MY GOD. It makes so much sense. Idk how I never realized how straight forward the military aircraft designation system actually is. My mind is blown, and this is an absolutely amazing video! It makes me love all of those planes like the F-22, F-15, B-2, B-29, C-5M, etc. Thank you so much for making this video.
@The_Joshuan_Empire
@The_Joshuan_Empire 2 жыл бұрын
You stated a total of: Two Fighter aircraft, Two Bomber aircraft, and, One Cargo aircraft
@wogelson
@wogelson 3 жыл бұрын
5:22 my worst jumpscare this year so far Congrats NWYT!
@chipcaronte
@chipcaronte 2 ай бұрын
Came for the curiosity, stayed for the humor! Love it!
@Mr.Moon95
@Mr.Moon95 3 жыл бұрын
Y=prototYpe E=special Electronic installation H=Helicopter - 60=60th design B=2an version of this design.
@janosd4nuke
@janosd4nuke 2 жыл бұрын
Lol, prototYpe. I always thought Y comes from experimental being X and Y follows X in the sequence of development and the alphabet.
@nightwalker9952
@nightwalker9952 3 жыл бұрын
5:23 My internet has been crashing a lot recently and it actually got me lol
@Donald1222
@Donald1222 Жыл бұрын
The airplane boneyard that he showed in the first seconds of the video is the place i really want to go to. and also i've seen a C-5 galaxy in person but i was far from it i was on the freeway i think and my grandma was driving and i saw it
@jeffersonchau7171
@jeffersonchau7171 3 жыл бұрын
So that means AC-130 is attack +cargo design 130. Makes sense because Ac-130 is used for cargo and attack
@CharliMorganMusic
@CharliMorganMusic 3 жыл бұрын
I don't think so. It can't do cargo because it's full of guns, so it wouldn't be used for cargo. I think it's that the C-130 is the base platform, but the preceding "A" is the modifier, so it's a C-130 modified for an attack role.
@djblueninja779
@djblueninja779 3 жыл бұрын
It carries cargo. And the cargo is hellfire. Sweet, sweet, hellfire. (The A in AC means while it was originally for Cargo, it is converted specifically for Attack purposes and not cargo.)
@shamanbhattacharyya9285
@shamanbhattacharyya9285 3 жыл бұрын
Well C is the base platform and A stands for attack. Makes sense cuz the AC-130 is a gunship and gunships satisfy the attack role hence the A
@cucuawe465
@cucuawe465 3 жыл бұрын
Gun,bomb,and ammunition are cargo too
@Cobra-King3
@Cobra-King3 3 жыл бұрын
yes, Starting from the C-130 Cargo, it is modified to have Weaponry to attack ground targets
@simonabunker
@simonabunker 3 жыл бұрын
So this is how to work out the designation - unless they decide to ignore the rules! Please don't put a KZbin taken down notice halfway through the video - I almost had a heart attack! Well played!
@stridell6616
@stridell6616 2 жыл бұрын
The manscaped ad was perhaps the best ad I've seen ever
@hullukana214
@hullukana214 3 жыл бұрын
Wasnt tzar bomba just a 50 megaton bomb and not 100 megaton. Soviets were planning to make 100 megaton bomb, but after testing thrir 50megaton bomb they decided it was powerful enough and didnt make any 100 megaton bombs.
@hullukana214
@hullukana214 3 жыл бұрын
@BloxyHD Just put a longer fuze in there and morr parachutes so it would still be in the air after the fuze goes off
@justandy333
@justandy333 3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣 5:20 literally just threw an actual fuck at my computer! Well played my friend, well played! 👍
@theedgyhighschoolkid1328
@theedgyhighschoolkid1328 2 жыл бұрын
Best manscaped ad I’m history of ads
@neoxenoz3262
@neoxenoz3262 3 жыл бұрын
S Designation: Attack submarines R Designation: Spy on the enemy SR-71: Wait I'm supposed to hunt submarines?
@NotWhatYouThink
@NotWhatYouThink 3 жыл бұрын
SR was used to indicate Strategic Reconnaissance, a non-standard designation.
@beaclaster
@beaclaster 3 жыл бұрын
quite sure they don't fly over oceans but ok.
@Markus-zb5zd
@Markus-zb5zd 3 жыл бұрын
Tbh it was a typo it was designed to be designated R-71
@spencerjackson3754
@spencerjackson3754 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah that's what confused me
@johanrunfeldt7174
@johanrunfeldt7174 3 жыл бұрын
The official mission of the U-2 when it was introduced, was weather research. Ironically, several years later, there was a version of the U-2 called WU-2, used for exactly that.
@axelfoley5265
@axelfoley5265 2 жыл бұрын
Should have been named WX-2 or WX-1 or something along there. WX literally meens (W=)Weather (X=)Reaserch.
@LordSmallest
@LordSmallest 2 жыл бұрын
@@axelfoley5265 X is Experimental? Not research?
@StickyBomb0512
@StickyBomb0512 Жыл бұрын
@@LordSmallest X is the status designation for Experimental status, but it is also the mission designation for Research.
@LordSmallest
@LordSmallest Жыл бұрын
@@StickyBomb0512 I didn't know that, ty
@arandomfallschirmjagerdude9141
@arandomfallschirmjagerdude9141 Жыл бұрын
Imagine they added another U....
@frocat5163
@frocat5163 2 жыл бұрын
That might be the greatest ad transition I've ever witnessed. Absolutely well done.
@philippeichert
@philippeichert 3 жыл бұрын
You deserve an Oscar for the sponsor transition. Well done sir.
@Tyrochus
@Tyrochus 3 жыл бұрын
2:35 that was a good one!
@HzRoPennyClown2
@HzRoPennyClown2 2 жыл бұрын
That F 15 pilot has big balls you landed it with one wing
@crookedlycrooked9256
@crookedlycrooked9256 3 жыл бұрын
Love these videos great knowledge and lots of jokes
@MrDukeMark
@MrDukeMark 3 жыл бұрын
This is the best add placement of an add and add itself, that ever existed
@timurgianti8385
@timurgianti8385 2 жыл бұрын
That was the smoothest transition to the sponsor of the video, ever!
@Mrlonelyuploader
@Mrlonelyuploader 3 жыл бұрын
Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward.
@IIMEERKATPLAYS
@IIMEERKATPLAYS 3 жыл бұрын
Someone plays a lot of civ 6
@sirsplintfastthepungent1373
@sirsplintfastthepungent1373 3 жыл бұрын
Until you get a motorcycle.
@cosmii
@cosmii 3 жыл бұрын
@C H A R L O T T E 🌹🥰 no
@Aaron-wq3jz
@Aaron-wq3jz 3 жыл бұрын
@@IIMEERKATPLAYS or civ 4
@averypoggamer3700
@averypoggamer3700 3 жыл бұрын
@@sirsplintfastthepungent1373 ?
@danielhope8577
@danielhope8577 3 жыл бұрын
5:18 Thanks for the heart attack lol
@NotWhatYouThink
@NotWhatYouThink 3 жыл бұрын
😅
@Robonoob_per
@Robonoob_per Жыл бұрын
Same
@Goofyahmc
@Goofyahmc Жыл бұрын
Bru I thought it was turning off I stg
@gonewhy
@gonewhy 2 жыл бұрын
“Everyone always talks about the giant balls, no one ever talks about maintain them”
@gonewhy
@gonewhy 2 жыл бұрын
Wow I just watched this guy rub white cream on and avacado what is he getting at…
@RosehipLovingTea
@RosehipLovingTea 3 жыл бұрын
Smooth, very smooth. The smoothest transition to a sponsor ever. Haha 😂
@danfruzzetti7604
@danfruzzetti7604 3 жыл бұрын
"a designation chosen for pun" that ranks hilariously high on "tell me you're a dad without telling me you're a dad"
@spencerjackson3754
@spencerjackson3754 3 жыл бұрын
Your profile pic makes this comment even better
@danfruzzetti7604
@danfruzzetti7604 3 жыл бұрын
@@spencerjackson3754 guilty as charged, dad for over a decade
@yotsuball
@yotsuball 3 жыл бұрын
Bro has such huge balls he has to hire people to maintain them
@Bobinarea52
@Bobinarea52 3 жыл бұрын
Slight correction tsar bomba is only 50MT not 100MT, it was scaled back.
@Sp00kq
@Sp00kq 3 жыл бұрын
Cus Russia was scared of the effects, and you know something is scary if Soviet Russia got scared of it
@Sp00kq
@Sp00kq 3 жыл бұрын
@@DingDingTheKZbinBuddy yea Gorbachev sounds right
@arturturkevych3816
@arturturkevych3816 3 жыл бұрын
@@Sp00kq it was Khrushchev. Gorbachev was the one in power when USSR collapsed. He's still alive
@Sp00kq
@Sp00kq 3 жыл бұрын
@@arturturkevych3816 ohhhh I see. Thank you!
@KemoTherapy69
@KemoTherapy69 3 жыл бұрын
That was the smoothest transition to a sponsor ever.
@germanpolarbear
@germanpolarbear 2 жыл бұрын
Epic sponsor transition. So smooth I had to pause the video, record my praises in the comment section, and then still went back to the video to watch the whole add. A+
@mk-lr8ok
@mk-lr8ok 3 жыл бұрын
Informative and hilarious. The big balls to manscape transition had me rolling on the floor.
@guy_in_the_moon
@guy_in_the_moon 3 жыл бұрын
Good knowledge, I’m thinking of joining the navy. I’m only 15 and planning to finish my education.
@aayushsharma7334
@aayushsharma7334 3 жыл бұрын
All the best buddy
@OrbInDaFrame
@OrbInDaFrame 3 жыл бұрын
You'll enjoy it I ship to basic on Nov 17 and I wanted to join the military since I moved back to the US when I was 6
@sirsplintfastthepungent1373
@sirsplintfastthepungent1373 3 жыл бұрын
Air Force has best chow. Navy has second best. Just some thought for food.
@someguyonyoutube1820
@someguyonyoutube1820 3 жыл бұрын
same. I wanna be F 18 pilot
@OrbInDaFrame
@OrbInDaFrame 3 жыл бұрын
@@someguyonyoutube1820 im trying to be a naval pilot aswell but I wanna get enlisted experience before I get my degree
@CaptainTNTxD
@CaptainTNTxD 2 жыл бұрын
This is the best sponsored content ever. Usually I would skip sponsors but this one was so good
@wildfirelabs
@wildfirelabs 3 жыл бұрын
Ahh yes now i know what iam gonna buy for my private army
@martyscreativeideas3082
@martyscreativeideas3082 3 жыл бұрын
Ima do the same
@beaclaster
@beaclaster 3 жыл бұрын
firstly buy some respects
@sirsplintfastthepungent1373
@sirsplintfastthepungent1373 3 жыл бұрын
I think this is the first time in my life I've heard "tzar" pronounced correctly.
@wtfwhereami
@wtfwhereami 3 жыл бұрын
Yea, basically tzar = sar, whilst czar = zar
@NotWhatYouThink
@NotWhatYouThink 3 жыл бұрын
😅👍🏼
@Social-Pro
@Social-Pro Ай бұрын
[5:24] I really thought it was unavailable🤣🤣😂😂
@rafalegaspi6615
@rafalegaspi6615 Жыл бұрын
7:55 “You’ve got a hole on your right wing!”
@matthewveenstra8530
@matthewveenstra8530 3 жыл бұрын
Does the "F" status prefix apply only to fixed wing fighters? Just curious because when you said that the f-14 popped into my head as a swept wing fighter. Great video btw!
@gordonrichardson2972
@gordonrichardson2972 3 жыл бұрын
Fixed wing (including swept wing), as opposed to rotary wing. There is no category for variable geometry wing.
@Luna-4L0n5
@Luna-4L0n5 3 жыл бұрын
The F-14 is a fixed-wing aircraft. Yeah, it can move the sweep angle of it's wings, but it is still considered a fixed-wing aircraft. The word fixed, i would presume, means that the wing is stationary in relation to the plane. I.e. the wing doesn't generate lift by moving itself. Unlike a helicopter, which moves it's wings (the blades) in order to generate lift.
@A.i.r_K
@A.i.r_K 3 жыл бұрын
@@gordonrichardson2972 rotary wings mostly refers to helis, right?
@MaxwellAerialPhotography
@MaxwellAerialPhotography 3 жыл бұрын
@@A.i.r_K rotary wing is helicopters. Helicopter rotors are especially rotating wings or airfoils.
@matthewveenstra8530
@matthewveenstra8530 3 жыл бұрын
@@Luna-4L0n5 Ah thank you for the clarification!
@luxqk
@luxqk 2 жыл бұрын
Bro i swear this sponsor transition and the sponsor itself is the best i've seen so far
@Fynnley525
@Fynnley525 3 жыл бұрын
neat, I actually has a P-8 Poseidon doing touch and goes at my local airport (KILM) a few nights ago, was pretty neat to see it flying around low like that
@taylorh.3484
@taylorh.3484 3 жыл бұрын
Come to Jacksonville Florida. There is AWKAYS one of these flying around. It flys so low you can see the probe arm sticking out the back.
@509Gman
@509Gman 3 жыл бұрын
13:23 Tsar Bomba had a theoretical yield of 100Mt if it’s lead cladding was switched out for a uranium one. This would also have greatly increased the fallout, so the test organizers chose to use the lead cladding instead, bringing the actual yield down to 50Mt. Even still, it remains the largest man made explosion on earth.
@1110-binary-days
@1110-binary-days 6 ай бұрын
This is rather helpful for my English GCSE speech that I have to perform next week.
@blue_8675
@blue_8675 8 ай бұрын
8:11 We save Balls💀
@cesarnogueira8407
@cesarnogueira8407 3 жыл бұрын
AH-Z1 viper A=attack H=helicopter Z= L I G H T E R T H A N A I R 1= first made
@yayeetmeoffacliff4708
@yayeetmeoffacliff4708 3 жыл бұрын
Im thinking Z is one of the later modifications, with the 1 being a modification of Z, but its so minor you cant just add another variant
@KennyNGA
@KennyNGA 3 жыл бұрын
The ah1 Cobra is much older
@marselijaneredford3161
@marselijaneredford3161 4 ай бұрын
Putting the avocados at the beginning and then during the Sponsor video - literally the funniest thing I’ve ever seen in my life
@4dirt2racer0
@4dirt2racer0 2 жыл бұрын
im kinda more impressed by the plane, it almost had its entire wing taken off n it still flew... it even looked half stable as it was landing.. thats impressive
@kendellmoore8367
@kendellmoore8367 2 жыл бұрын
No, you should be more impressed by the PILOT. Every good fighter pilot knows 1 wing is essential, 2 wings are a luxury.
@4dirt2racer0
@4dirt2racer0 2 жыл бұрын
@@kendellmoore8367 ur not wrong about the pilot, i just didn't know planes were that stable
@kendellmoore8367
@kendellmoore8367 2 жыл бұрын
@@4dirt2racer0 Yeah it's crazy he didn't even know he was missing a wing he later stated if he had known he would've ejected haha
@4dirt2racer0
@4dirt2racer0 2 жыл бұрын
@@kendellmoore8367 dam really??? I missed that part completely Im goin to have to watch again im usually pretty good at guessing or estimating the outcome or results of something, i love when somethings completely counter intuitive like this lol im weird
@afatcatfromsweden
@afatcatfromsweden 3 жыл бұрын
The tsar bomba was planned to be 100mt but ended up at 50.
@riothero313
@riothero313 2 жыл бұрын
That's a Russian measuring tape. You have to convert it.
@robertbennett883
@robertbennett883 3 жыл бұрын
"There is no A-8" I think the Harrier might object, dissed just because it can land vertically AV-8
@dennisbrucemasayon786
@dennisbrucemasayon786 3 жыл бұрын
Military: To organize aircraft categories let us make a system fo that Also military: screw them lets give this fighter an A category🤣
@Ryanbmc4
@Ryanbmc4 3 жыл бұрын
Or a strategic bomber F. F117
@bruno13532
@bruno13532 2 жыл бұрын
1:56 that line was pure gold
@someguyonyoutube1820
@someguyonyoutube1820 3 жыл бұрын
1:57 really 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@stephenlightning3023
@stephenlightning3023 Жыл бұрын
Seriously, that’s what it stands for.
@Goolian7
@Goolian7 3 жыл бұрын
13:23 I thought the Tsar bomba was 50 megatons??
@joseph6270
@joseph6270 3 жыл бұрын
I was under that impression as well, I thought the 50 mt one was actually tested but they designed a 100 mt version as well
@amirsalih2332
@amirsalih2332 2 жыл бұрын
It is 50 megaton but It was supposed to be 100 megatons. What a nuke.
@chienfeu
@chienfeu Жыл бұрын
The video is clear, footage is on-point, the sponsored part is great
@derschneiper239
@derschneiper239 3 жыл бұрын
0:29 What I read: YEH BOB
@washu2434
@washu2434 3 жыл бұрын
16:25 me after taco bell
@hinth4322
@hinth4322 3 жыл бұрын
Manscape gets some pretty great ads, but this is probably the best I've seen yet
@memelephant
@memelephant 2 жыл бұрын
8:01 you can see the photoshop blur
@izzo87
@izzo87 6 ай бұрын
Yea but the missing wing is real
@Alxbrtr
@Alxbrtr 2 жыл бұрын
8:48😂😂😂😂
Why This Obsolete Bomber Will Outlive EVERYTHING
18:16
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Why American and European Airplanes Are So Different
9:52
Beyond Facts
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma
00:33
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН
УДИВИЛ ВСЕХ СВОИМ УХОДОМ!😳 #shorts
00:49
Evolution of American Aircraft Carriers
31:18
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
How MAGIC CARPET Revolutionized Aircraft Carriers
16:54
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 529 М.
The Airplane That Looked Fake, But Was 100% Real: XB-70 Valkyrie
17:30
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
50 Insane Fighter Jets Facts That Will Shock You!
14:40
The Infographics Show
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
How Russia Ruined its Only Aircraft Carrier
12:46
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
15 BIGGEST Helicopters Ever Produced
27:16
Top Fives
Рет қаралды 87 М.
Why F-35 Don't Fly During Thunderstorms
16:53
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
The 9 Different Types Of Fighter jets Explained
8:27
The Buzz
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma
00:33
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН