The 9 Different Types Of Fighter jets Explained

[@johndyson4109]

The SR-71 is not a fighter in any form or way.. Same with the F-117, it's a bomber!

[@dineshverma6087]

True.....Sr 71 is for reconnaissance

[@Sleepysod]

The “F” designation of the F-117 is quite an interesting piece to look up on Wikipedia, really hadn’t crossed my mind before

[@nish221100]

@@Sleepysod thanks. Just read it.

[@massmike11]

Yf-12a fighter interceptor version would have been a better choice

[@frank-ko6de]

She clearly never said it was a fighter plane, learn to listen, you ridiculous nonsense.

[@npaladin2000]

Most of these designations are historical. Modern air forces have focused on the merged multirole/strategic fighter

[@nish221100]

"Fighter JETS"?!? P-38 is a prop. The examples and the text has a lot of errors (e.g. F15 is multirole, not a intercepter). SR-71 is not a "fighter"; YF-12 was.

[@WolfeSaber]

P was for pursuit. Now, it is patrol

[@HarryKaemerle]

Isn’t the F-15 an air superiority fighter?

[@WolfeSaber]

@@HarryKaemerle It's got the rap sheet to prove it.

[@scottdakadescot4127]

Hello there Kim, how are you doing? I'm so glad that your voice sounds perfect again because it's so beautiful and calm.

[@blackmonday5295]

The F15 is the most successful air superiority fighter ever. It is not an interceptor. An interceptor would be a Mirage III.

[@thpass]

There's a lot of overlap and a few of the examples don't belong to the "Fighter" category. The F-104 never saw service as a fighter-bomber. The F-111 would be more accurate for that category. The all weather and recon examples should not be included as "fighter" aircraft. The SR-71 was never designed for that role, it was purely reconnaissance spy plane. Military jet is fine as a broad category here.

[@k.h.1587]

This video is trash, but the YF12 was an interceptor version of the SR71, it didn't go into service but a few were made and flown

[@thesirmaddog8209]

The best Fight Bomber was the F-111 Ardvark.... There isn't such a thing as Reconnaissance fighter

[@WalterCroley]

F-104 was an interceptor with very limited ordnance carrying capabilities.

[@moodogco]

The f104 was not a fighter bomber, it was a interceptor

[@WalterCroley]

SR71 was not a fighter. It was reconnaissance only.

[@congnghequansuvn474]

Many of the above are not fighter, replace the word with "jet" pls

[@k.h.1587]

Talking about the p38 in wwII being shot down by surface to air missles that didn't exist yet

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

SR 71 is not a fighter jet

[@mahroushabib6344]

You are right but the sr 71 had a fighter version the a12

[@klardfarkus3891]

F15 and f14 are multi role fighters, not dedicated interceptors.

[@rodrigorincongarcia771]

p-38 a jet fighter?😲

[@Marcellogo]

Never heard of a "strategic" fighters before today and generally all of them seems invented: F-15 is NOT an interceptor and F-104 is used as a fighter bomber only in G version, previous are light fighters and the S is an interceptors. And all generally reeks of american exceptionalism and chauvinism, not a single example that's is taken from another country. No mirages, No MiGs or Sukhoi, no Fockle-Wulf or Messerschmitt, no Bae Harrier, no Saab, no Mitsubishi or Nakaijma. No Caccia, no Frontal Aviation, No PVO, no Zerstozers and not even planes from the US Navy.

[@klardfarkus3891]

Seems like these buzz videos are just some high school kids school project posted on KZbin.

[@daudzaheer1770]

F104 was not a fighter bomber aircraft

[@nish221100]

Not really, but it was used for CAS in Vietnam at times.

[@daudzaheer1770]

@@nish221100 yeah I guess as it was also used to strike enemy airfield in 1971 war

[@billgund4532]

The Luftwaffe used the F-104 for "toss bombing" nuclear weapons. It was originally designed as a fair weather interceptor. Climb like a scalded cat (sorry Cleo), make a few gun/missile passes (slash & dash or boom & zoom)then haul ass back to base. In that role, the 104 set the standard.

[@klardfarkus3891]

To the buzz every aircraft is a fighter. Total ignorance.

[@dennisleighton2812]

What a load of absolute bollocks!

[@Hitman1978]

Not sure where you're from, but you definitely need better sources of information....had to turn it off when you actually said the F-5 incorporated stealth technology...I literally could feel my IQ dropping!

[@bullymaguire1835]

Title: The 9 different types of fighters explained Video: uS hAs tHe mOst pOWerFul aiRCrAfTs 🤡🤓🤓🏳️‍🌈🇺🇸

[@Alex-0908]

What did you want to see there?

[@bullymaguire1835]

@@Alex-0908 Anything but not the US bias

[@michaelhband]

👍👍👍❤❤❤✈✈✈

[@klardfarkus3891]

On would thing the mig 31 would be a better example,of a,pure interceptor than the f15. Just illustrates the bias of this,propaganda channel.

[@gasparguadalupethecante6377]

the buzz the best in the world

[@thunderstrikesc1261]

i like them but they are incorrect often, the sr 71 and 117 are not fighter jets

[@captainsimic]

Stupid story ....