you are best teacher not only of chemistry but physics also....you teach concepts so deeply that at physics chemistry seems same...(also they are).... thanks sir😊
@ritika13193 жыл бұрын
U make chemistry interesting apse smjh ke pta lga ki yein cheez kaise hai apne sahi mein apne channel ko exact name diya hai. Thank you so much 🙏🙏
@mrcrazyexperiment4324 жыл бұрын
Very nice and logically explained, thanks sir
@BasitAliShahi6 ай бұрын
Sir I'm Bs physics student,i was wondering at KZbin since a week for the particle physics but no one explained as you lots of love from sindh Pakistan ❤❤❤❤
@abhishek35034 жыл бұрын
This is one of the most interesting topic in science ❤
@fareehashahid48842 жыл бұрын
Exactly the video i was looking for Very well explained Thank you so much ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
@ujjalchanda2 жыл бұрын
Although I have parted my ways with physics since 12th standard and had to choose a different career path. But this video has refrshed my memory and has ignited something within me to know and understand more about these stuff.....Thanks a ton for the amazing content and explanation
@amanbayad173 жыл бұрын
It's an Amazing channel It's One of its Kind and Different form the Same kind Of Channels
@saisai-pw6uw Жыл бұрын
You are concept booster 😍😍😍
@anandmadigatla74313 жыл бұрын
Very talented and teaching while having fun, well done bro🙏🙏🤓
@Dr.shaheen7552 жыл бұрын
Sir u r the best teacher of physical chemistry..For me u r my favourite.Thank u so much sir👌💯💯💯💯💯💯🤗🤗🤗
@ashishkumar-vc3ro4 жыл бұрын
so far this is the best explaination of standard model I've seen . very easy to catch . thank you sir
@kiran24344 жыл бұрын
M.sc.ke liye benificial h na plz reply krna
@shabnamdan7898 Жыл бұрын
Very informative. Thanks.
@VISHANTNATH3 жыл бұрын
Good explanation Very good sir It helped me to learn more information about subatomic particles. Thankyou and LORD BLESS YOU Sir
@anchalkharyal41583 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir 😭 u r really god of physics for me👍 thax keep shine
@authen52794 жыл бұрын
Sir, tys 4 being with us. Lots of love from Odisha ♥️♥️♥️♥️
@7252chem_man4 жыл бұрын
Brilliant sir with brillant basics of. ChemisTry ..
@chemistrybysaadanwar4 жыл бұрын
Sir I m first to see
@gamingtherapy89182 жыл бұрын
14:50 47 crore 90 lakh one thousand and six
@masteringchemistry0074 жыл бұрын
You are a great teacher
@sagnikmitra62654 жыл бұрын
Was waiting for a new series from u for a long time and the wait finally ends Love u sir
@SpotterVideo Жыл бұрын
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
@physicsuntold66983 жыл бұрын
Sir mei M.sc physics ka student hoon aur aap ke videos dekh kr Meire Raman spectroscopy ,NMR , neuclear physics sub topic ke concept clear hue sir you are genius sir🙏
@ummarakhan23172 жыл бұрын
Thank you so so much Sir 🦋...you nailed it !
@akshayrathod62514 жыл бұрын
Awesome 👌📚
@atulkalkhuria44054 ай бұрын
Pion ( up + antidown) Kaon ( up/dowm + strange)
@bhavanasharma15124 жыл бұрын
Awesome sir.....thank u 🙏
@raghavsharma9549 Жыл бұрын
Very helpful video sir u r gjb❤❤❤
@sonukumari63334 жыл бұрын
Siirrr... U r great.. Just loved itt.. Thankuu sirrrr❤️❤️😄😄😄
@tanmay_vashistha_3 жыл бұрын
Sir quarks ka charge hame kaise pata chala aur kisne dhunda
@aayankhan62073 жыл бұрын
Ur videos are awesome .very helpful
@kumariaparnamallick33254 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir is series ko start krne k liye
@anumitra75014 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir U r my favorite teacher ,i love ur teaching style😇😇😇
@abhaymanimishra82832 жыл бұрын
You the best sir ❤👌
@prokashdas39544 жыл бұрын
Thank you☺
@Abirkar034 жыл бұрын
♥️♥️♥️ you are always awesome
@1221-p5s4 жыл бұрын
best lecture but you should to write clean . Don't mind thank you sir
@udayselva14763 жыл бұрын
Superb sir ❤️🙏 . But Ur writing on board a bit blurr we can't see properly .plzz write a bit dark or zoom a bit.
@farhanullah38873 жыл бұрын
watch in 720p ...
@shauryachaurasia42224 жыл бұрын
Sir your my guru for chemistry, I totally relate to everything that you teach It's my humble request to you, can you please make videos for Stereochemistry🙏
@sanatmishra5214 жыл бұрын
superb sir👌
@chemophilicchemistsclub44154 жыл бұрын
Sir what about electron?? Is it baryons Or misons
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
check carefully its lepton the fundamental particle nt made up of anythng.
@prithvirajnaik78774 жыл бұрын
Ty,sir for this video.sir,sting theory or bosons kya hai?
@aarfakhan44733 жыл бұрын
Thank you soo much sir
@vaibhavhiremath6783 жыл бұрын
👌👌wonderful ❤
@MadhusudhanExplains4 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@tribhuvansingh3644 Жыл бұрын
Best forever.
@ManishaYadav-dr3vl4 жыл бұрын
U make me fall with chemistry everytime...such a great teacher u are..thankyou and lots of love from HARYANA🙂😊
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
It's my pleasure
@srikantadash46033 жыл бұрын
Sir namastae.. Sir apne epr spectroscopy pe video nehi banaaye hain. Plse bana dijiyae..... And my xm is very near to me.. I'm quitting epr... Plse upload playlist of epr... Once... After my semester I'll watch ur video. Plse upload.
@adityadam624 жыл бұрын
sir is this efficient for IIT JAM ?
@chaitranarayan-1711 ай бұрын
sir, it would be very helpful if u could share the refernce books
@yugandharmaurya65684 жыл бұрын
Wah sir kya bat hai. Apka koi jabab nhi. Video download nhi karenge. Sir quantum chemistry pr bhi ek basic aur dhamaakedaar video banaiye. Apke channel se career endeavor aur chem acedemi vale bahut jalte hai.
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
JALTE HAIN AISA KU ??
@omjadhav87004 жыл бұрын
@@Chemistryuntold ap free deto ho esliyna
@yugandharmaurya65684 жыл бұрын
Mai dono coaching me padha hu. Maine vha pr sir logo ko kahte suna tha. Aap bahut basic detail bata dete ho. Jabki coaching valoq ke pss etna time nhi hota hai ki vo etna sab bataye, to student apka channel ka name lekar explain puchhte hai. Esliye vo log chidhte hai
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
Thats true coaching classes dnt have tht much time to get into details of every topic ,and thats not wrng. They all are doing best in their domain. Convey my Warm Hello to all of them if ever my name comes there.
@chemefriend80293 жыл бұрын
Outstanding sir..
@Shalini.singh.sg.474 жыл бұрын
Great sir🙌😀
@eliyafatima Жыл бұрын
Thank u 💓💓💓
@shuttlingofchemistryusr41574 жыл бұрын
Thats good.
@HabiburRahman-qg7ln6 ай бұрын
Thanks
@sameerb37184 жыл бұрын
Sir please can you make a video on why we need to study chemistry ? So it very useful for students and make interest on chemistry...🙏🙏🙏🙏
@kadakban76094 жыл бұрын
Thank sir
@mahmud98079 ай бұрын
Me means mega, no million
@pragyantripathi83014 жыл бұрын
Sir plz teaching like this. I watch the ads in your lectures for full duration as a mark of respect to what all you give us. Infact, every educational video that I watch on KZbin, I make sure to watch the ads fully
@mainulshakib50713 жыл бұрын
thank u so much vaiya ''''
@vijaysrivastava7399 Жыл бұрын
Sir yhe playlist kya complete chapter ki h??
@jayshreekrishna25083 жыл бұрын
great sir
@gullakuntarajaiah84763 жыл бұрын
Love you sir
@drswapnilprabhulkar61834 жыл бұрын
We can say atom as a chemically indivisible particle.
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
Yes which shows the properties of element, after it there will be properties of individual sub atomic particles not the element.
@drswapnilprabhulkar61834 жыл бұрын
@@Chemistryuntold Yes.😊जय विज्ञान.
@roofahmad31404 жыл бұрын
Nice sir keep it up Ek request thi ap plz thoda BADA Likha kro board par we r unable to write it No 4g internet @kashmir Digital India ???
@Mhow_Karate4 жыл бұрын
thanks sir😘
@mangeshpal93474 жыл бұрын
Nice
@healthylifewithtania93774 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir
@harryisronpotter70012 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@Pratimakesharwani4 жыл бұрын
Sir please make a video of valency
@hanumansingh80134 жыл бұрын
Sir please make most of the videos of class 12
@mohit__sarvaiya___4 жыл бұрын
Sir please lecture thoda slow me padhaye aur upload long videos
@Sachinkumar-ww6zw4 жыл бұрын
mast sir thank u sir
@tanmyigawade29254 жыл бұрын
Please make videos on chromatography also
@RipudamanRao4 жыл бұрын
i need more particle physics videos PLZZZZZ
@ujjwaladewangan68094 жыл бұрын
Sir.. Mai Msc k bad UPsc krna chahti hu.. to Msc IIT se karu ya kisi local clg se.. Kyoki IIT se krne ke liye drop lena hoga mujhe.... Aap kuch guide kr skte hain??
@PawanSingh-oj7cr4 жыл бұрын
Bro IIT msc sae kargo tho tumhara weightage badaega upsc interview mai... Aur tum life time IITian bhi khalowge...aur agar upsc karne hai toh why msc... Give direct upsc exam
@Pratimakesharwani4 жыл бұрын
Please please please plus please please plus please please please please please please....... ... ....... ....... .. Please Please make a video on valency...
@poojarani05034 жыл бұрын
Sir aap ki specialization kya h please sir aap btaye
@khansadafjamalabdulnasir11054 жыл бұрын
Hello Sir.. I'm a student of MSc Chemistry. Sir if you could please make a video on Edge and screw dislocation.. Actually I came across many videos about these topics but they were from mechanical engineering point of view.. and it's really hard to understand from Google and other websites and due to this lockdown it's impossible to get any book.. It's my sincere request to you Sir please if you can help me.. I really really hope that you come across my comment..
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
I will do it for sure. 😊
@khansadafjamalabdulnasir11054 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot Sir.. that really means a lot.. heartfelt thank you 😊
@pranajit82604 жыл бұрын
Sir, Kya aapka telegram channel hay ? Agar nhi hay to hona chahiye ... Waha par agar ye sab notes de dete to a66a hota sir
@shashikantsajan57734 жыл бұрын
Sir please make video regarding csir net gate for chemistry...(no complete videos is present on you tube regarding Nuclear chemistry )
@Chemistryuntold4 жыл бұрын
I MAKE CONCEPTUAL VIDEOS YOU CAN LISTEN WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR EXAMS.
@vishalsangwan14694 жыл бұрын
Sir iss vedio me bhut add aa rhi h lekin aaj gussa nhi aaya 😂😂 because I see your income Vedio of educational KZbinr 😂
@study83444 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌
@b.kendre_74993 жыл бұрын
🌹🙏
@bhartimehta90253 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@shashikantsajan57734 жыл бұрын
Sir please make video regarding csir net gate chemistry...please sir....sir please it's a kindly request please sir...🙏🙏
@yugandharmaurya65684 жыл бұрын
Sir kyo mass ko E. V. mein likhte hai.
@jivanjyotistudiesandtechno78402 ай бұрын
❤❤❤😊😊
@Sk.940 Жыл бұрын
Hadrons are of two types 1 is Baryons and 2 is Mesons Baryons are of two types 1. Nucleons -(proton and Neutron) 2. Hyperons -(Lambda,Sigma, cascade,ohm) Mesons- are of three types 1 is π Mesons(π +,π-,π°) 2 is Eta Mesons (Eta °) 3 K Mesons ( K+, K°)
@babajighule19644 жыл бұрын
MeV.... Instead of million mega word is used in physics
@NitishKumar-jp7vg Жыл бұрын
Sir aap bar bar "kuch neutrons" kyu bol rhe ? Kya Inka number specified nahi h?