Features, Use And Capabilities Of Field Artillery Weaponry In The Cannon Type Artillery Category And Rocket And Missile Category.
Пікірлер: 350
@billcowan6070 Жыл бұрын
I was a Gunner on the M110 8incj SP howitzer in Vietnam with A battery 2/94 artillery from July 1969 til September 1970
@theflamecoreguy79293 ай бұрын
Thank you for your service 🙏
@jaydogg81st3 жыл бұрын
My father served two tours in Vietnam. He was part of a Heavy Field AMy father served two tours in Vietnam. He was in the Heavy Field Artillery Battalion for the 1st Calvary - The horse that couldn't be riddin, and the line that couldn't be crossed. He passed away a few years ago, but I will never forget him and love him forever 💫✨ Thank you to all the men and women in our armed forces. POW MIA - YOU ARE NEVER FORGOTTEN
@jamielacourse75782 жыл бұрын
I can't understand why that glaring white star was used. Would that not make a good target?
@thuyle6051 Жыл бұрын
@@jamielacourse7578 😅😊no8th8
@user-mq8pr8tv9e3 ай бұрын
Thanks
@jameskawaikaupejrcwo3usmcr5732 жыл бұрын
I served with the Artillery in the beginning of my career in the Marine Corps. 12th Marine Corps Regiment, specifically 4th Bn/ 12th Marines and 3rd Bn, 12th Marines in 1974-1975. Then to 29 Palms, MCB, California with the 1st Field Artillery Group, FMF, ie 1st FAG. As a Ground Radio Repairmen. As they say in the Corps the King of the Battle is Artillery and the Queen of battle is the Grunts. Gotta love these guys. Better to ride than walk I’d say. Semper Fidelis Marines.
@therond.patron49593 жыл бұрын
Field artillery the king of battle. No regrets in ever having served. But I do not miss it at all.
@jonsingle16142 жыл бұрын
Ahhh....Good ol Ft Sill.....13B here....M110A2 and M109A4 and A6 Never a toad !
@bitsnpieces114 жыл бұрын
I was next to a battery of 8 inch Howitzers and 175 mm "Long Toms" in VN in '68. When they shot over our area you needed to be sure there was nothing on shelves near your head.
@michaelthomas71782 жыл бұрын
I lived in Elgin Oklahoma in the 1960s. I seen all of these Guns in action on FT Sill training ranges.
@user-lt2ze3bs7u5 ай бұрын
The Army is just way too awesome
@terryfowler6090Ай бұрын
13E40 from70 to 78. One tour in Nam. Nice to see Ft. SILL again and watch some old guns shoot.
@IoannisAr11 жыл бұрын
US ARMY had always had a tradition in field artillery,even Germans were stunned by its amazing firepower in the field
@hibco3000 Жыл бұрын
And accuracy.
@saltandsteelforever92424 жыл бұрын
That SPH later became one of the most popular M109A2 with 155mm Cal 55 barrel!
@dirtydave26914 жыл бұрын
I got to see Army Reserve M110 8 inch Howitzers fire during Desert Storm and a few times at Fort Carson. Oh Lord they were loud!
@marcatteberry13614 жыл бұрын
I was 13B10, In 85, I went to 1st AD, 1Bn 22Fa in Nuremberg. M109A2. Loved it. We had the copperhead then, and I just heard the A7 STILL has 1 or 2 copperheads on hand as well! I have to say tho.. The power packs for the A2 SUCKED! I always said there should just be a generator to run the gun systems while emplaced... now we do. your welcome. Also, go get me some hydraulic cherry juice for the gun, from the Cook. He knows what to use...
@khahuynh54433 жыл бұрын
Qq11qqqq1
@chintran2793 жыл бұрын
@@khahuynh5443u i
@williambilltran35284 жыл бұрын
Excellent beautiful
@edwardbartoneb4 жыл бұрын
Brings back memories.
@kousukemorimoto5234 жыл бұрын
Edward Batting w
@angrypatriot53924 жыл бұрын
Ft Sill?
@prashanthb652110 жыл бұрын
Good documentary film.Thank you for uploading it.
@guatuzzijr78894 жыл бұрын
EXCELENTE DOCUMENTAL
@billhuber29644 жыл бұрын
The king of the battlefield. Hail to the king baby!!! Thankyouverymuch.
@angrypatriot53924 жыл бұрын
Whoahh
@user-lt2ze3bs7u5 ай бұрын
Artillery looks like it would be very fun and exciting
@Lockbar4 жыл бұрын
36:40 Werner von Braun says...."YES"!!!!!!!!!
@sivphech15094 жыл бұрын
GyyG will ty vyv. G. GGvgvt. G vgyv G t Vy day Vy vy vvvgg the season they are free and
Was Trained on the 105,,mm ended shooting the 155mm bother towed and Mobile!! Fired Thousands of rounds!
@davidrasch30824 жыл бұрын
Used to call the 155 towed 'pig iron'.
@martinkerker11904 жыл бұрын
Should of just called it "TOAD"
@davidrasch30824 жыл бұрын
@@martinkerker1190 We called the 155mm towed gun 'pig iron' because of its weight and difficulty to handle. If memory serves, the spades weighed close to a hundred pounds each.
Nhìn lại cảnh chiến tranh thấy thương cho cả hai.ai cũng đâu thương.tai sao ko cũng nhau hòa hợp nhìn thấy ai bị thương và chết thật thấy đâu lòng qua
@13BravoBiggunsM110SP2 ай бұрын
Artillery 💥 when smaller guns are just not enough 🤣👍 king of battle self propelled
@eogg254 жыл бұрын
They showed the Honest John Rocket at 1.23 min, I was in a Honest John rocket Unit. We had two rockets if we fired both of them we became an infantry company that's what they used to say. they also showed the corporal missal before it they were in the same Casern I was in. In the states I was in a 155 outfit in the 1st infantry Div.
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
Where was you stationed? Germany, korea, states?
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
8 inch Howitzer....holy shit
@eogg254 жыл бұрын
@@thetreblerebelAnsbach, Germany.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
More or less the same story in modern MLRS units. I was trained as an MLRS crewman. Spent most of my time deployed mucking around as an infantryman in both howitzer and MLRS units.
@13thBear3 жыл бұрын
eogg25 Were you MOS trained as both cannon and missile crewman? If not, we're you just OJT for training?
@richardcortez65384 жыл бұрын
Noticed the creases in the uniforms
@Noises4 жыл бұрын
My grandfather won medals for raining down this kind of ordinance onto Nazis in world war two. I honor his memory by hating the nazis and fascists he fought against every bit as much as he did.
@blackirish7814 жыл бұрын
Lol, edgy boi.
@Spade_19174 жыл бұрын
@@blackirish781 Stfu nazi lover
@kazsmaz4 жыл бұрын
@@Spade_1917 he definitely is an edgy boy
@miscsilliness4 жыл бұрын
Noises So you don’t like democrats. Me neither.
@RicTic664 жыл бұрын
Won medals? All by himself? Hmmm. Pity most of these weapons weren't available in WWII.
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
6/37th and 1/14th FA veteran MLRS/HIMARS.
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
The 6/37th in Korea use to use M110 before it switched to MLRS
@pacoalcaina48094 жыл бұрын
La artillería de la democracia. Unos disparan más democracia qué otros, depende de las dimensiones del país donde la lleven.
@NYdxn4 жыл бұрын
Chiến tranh VN từ 1965-1975 cũng có xử dụng 105mm -155mm và 175mm song cùng thể loại những model mới tiện lợi hơn đáp ứng yểm trợ nhanh hơn không thấy xuất hiện
@TheCerebralDude4 жыл бұрын
2:47 what happens to me when I think about Dee Shannell lol
@scarakus4 жыл бұрын
The Germans built some good shit for us, back in the day.
@vdotme4 жыл бұрын
@Andrew Callaway He didn't say developed or howitzers, he said shit. They did build some good shit.
@FrancoisLabelle-yf8tj4 жыл бұрын
The German did not invent rocket technology... Ballard, a US engineer, was the one who perfected the uses of gyros and ballistics...the German, in their war effort, invested heavily in this technology and perfected it... while again, the US, Canada and Britain perfected the atomic weapon...
@juanshaftpatel74884 жыл бұрын
@Andrew Callaway youre racist
@williamkuykendall75694 жыл бұрын
13F ooorahh
@th51602 жыл бұрын
Jesus, all of these are nuclear capable. Imagine If we engaged wars with nuclear artillery.
@gary36964 жыл бұрын
Was hoping to see Davy Crockett, but no such luck...was that more an Infantry weapon considering the RR as we had both 90mm and 106mm, anyone know?
@bantalee20024 жыл бұрын
A btry 1/84th FA. Fort Lewis Wa. 1972-76 155 howitzer towed.
@valentinius624 жыл бұрын
A btry 7/9th FA USAR, late '80s-early '90s. 8" howitzer self-propelled.
@m.redleg2524 жыл бұрын
HHB 3/11 FA Ft. Lewis 1988-1990 M1989 towed, then 1/157 FA 1991-2005 Colorado ARNG M110A2 SP to M109A5 to M270 MLRS.
@nemtpasal4594 жыл бұрын
на начале и на конце римскими цифрами написано 1965й год МСМLXV M=1000 CM=900 LX=60 V=5 1000+900+60+5=1965
@alexgoncalves48713 жыл бұрын
Não só do exército mas das três Forças Militar dos Estados Unidos da América
@corporalkang-in-chan79264 жыл бұрын
King of the battlefield
@valentinius624 жыл бұрын
They're all gone now (from U.S. inventory anyway) except the new generation M109 155 SP howitzer.
@valentinius623 жыл бұрын
@pyrotechnic5254 I believe so. By new generation I mean the one with GPS positioning and onboard fire solutions computer. Also has a travel lock mechanism for the tube that can be operated from within. The crew never has to go outside and has the ability to do quick fire missions at any time. There might be other improvements but I can't remember. I did see these being demonstrated live fire at Fort Sill. The original (well, compared to the newer version, that is a longer barrel so I guess the A1?) was the one I trained on. All gun data was generated and sent by the FDC. Later on I was the FDO for an 8" howitzer battery.
@ronaldrenken57374 жыл бұрын
3/37TH SARGEANT MISSLE ARTILLERY 1968
@garypulliam37404 жыл бұрын
Sergeant
@tyrelliuslogellus6253 Жыл бұрын
Why even have towed versions of the Howitzers if they could all be self-propelled?
@richmanwisco Жыл бұрын
This was a period of transition in the Army. A lot of the towed systems were holdovers from WWII and Korea. Self propelled systems were beginning to emerge based on developing doctrine to counter the Soviet Union. By the time I entered the Army in 1986, we were down to 7 main artillery systems (105T, 155T, 155SP, 8"SP, MLRS, Lance, Pershing) which soon went to 5 with the retirement of Lance and Pershing (the weapon that won the Cold War). It was a doctrine known as Air-Land implemented during the '80s that reorganized the composition of artillery formations and tactics.
@26TptCoy4 жыл бұрын
Over 50 years ago and still some serious stuff. They used to select the biggest guys for artillery from the recruits, I asked but they said too small.
@ms15354 жыл бұрын
@Liam Murphy I enlisted in the Arty and was always 155’s. I was only 5’5” 140lbs. I was on M109’s in Germany and then towed 198’s at Ord. Yeah, it started to kick my butt humping 90lb projos. Going thru PNOC they always gave me the M60 or radio to carry even tho we had 6’ tall grunts in our squad. Go figure, huh?
@angrypatriot53924 жыл бұрын
I was 5'7 155 when I enlisted for Cannon Crewmember 13B. Changed MOS and became 13 FOX calling it in.
@ms15354 жыл бұрын
@Angry Patriot I never thought of changing MOS. Smart move...I did 4 yrs busting my ass. Haha
@angrypatriot53924 жыл бұрын
@@ms1535 Whoahh 👍
@jacobstewart19504 жыл бұрын
Hail to to the king. Rapid fire
@JonBoltinghouse2 жыл бұрын
Red legs all the way. Ft Sill Oklahoma👍🇺🇸
@dungphanang8414 жыл бұрын
Vua chiến trường.
@brandonwagner38734 жыл бұрын
Army cool
@jackbelk85274 жыл бұрын
That must have been filmed in early '65. The stripes changed from yellow to OD about then. I was in an M-110 battalion, I-Corp, Korea.
@KPearce574 жыл бұрын
No we still had black/ yellow name and us army in 1975
@wooderdsaunders68014 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many of these are still in use? I am sure alot of updates on computers etc.
@Wabbaaajack4 жыл бұрын
None of them are in use anymore, every howitzer you see here has been discontinued and replaced
@eltoni198111 жыл бұрын
Lessons well learned from the WERMACHT!:))
@minho84034 жыл бұрын
Ok.
@minho84034 жыл бұрын
Bang qua lửa dan tập 18
@alexanderzerka84772 жыл бұрын
In 1966, even your M1911A1 was nuclear-capable.
@rosalesefra12114 жыл бұрын
Awesome upload, thank you. Question For the experts out there: if the the maximum elevation of the 175 mm m107 gun is 1166 mills, what would be the elevation of a single mill, if we measure it in millimeters? Just asking here fellas.
@thalesnemo28414 жыл бұрын
@Rosales Efra I believe that a full circle is 6400 mils! So 1166 mils is 10.9 degrees .
@FrancoisLabelle-yf8tj4 жыл бұрын
1.0 millimetre!
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Actual field artilleryman here: The Mil does not equal "1 millimeter" it's closest metric equivalent is the micrometer. But to answer the question: 1 Mil = 0.0254 mm
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
@pyrotechnic5254 that’s what I said... And I’m aware what a mil is...seeing as I was in the field artillery
@copperlemon13 жыл бұрын
A true miliradian is one thousandth of a radian, which is (1/2π turns) or 57.296°. Therefore a milirad is about 0.057° or 3.438' However, NATO member state armed forces define a mil as (1/6400 turns), 0.056°, or 3.375' 1166 NATO mil is 65.5875° Hopefully this covers everything relevant
@1776adb5 жыл бұрын
Served in Cu Chi 1966-67 A Battery 13th. Artillery 25th. Infantry 155 self propelled. Welcome home my brothers- God bless you.
@gregwright3924 жыл бұрын
My dad was in The 13th too. SSG Fred Wright. God bless n thank you for your service
@drdnout4 жыл бұрын
That war was a crime of american regime.
@freddiefalseflagger75454 жыл бұрын
Дредноут Императоров shut up you pussy.
@drdnout4 жыл бұрын
@@freddiefalseflagger7545 STFU clitoris.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
I was in C Battery of the 13th in 2008-2009 it's an MLRS unit now...or was...I think they may have switched to HIMARS, which is just a wheeled version of MLRS.
@amyjojinkerson67453 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't want to be on the business end of one of these
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
даже на 105йнет досыльника у паладина вообще картузное заряжэание
@WhiskeyRichard.4 жыл бұрын
"One of the greatest casualty-producing agencies on the field of battle" No longer considered a PC motto anymore
@richardkirka59774 жыл бұрын
Whiskey Richard "Artillery kills, infantry occupies."
@WhiskeyRichard.4 жыл бұрын
@@richardkirka5977 Now with GPS
@ernielara15534 жыл бұрын
Those rockets, were they ever used in actual war?ie vietnam,balkans etc.
@thegrandlevel3139 ай бұрын
The 105 looks WAY better in the slick old OD
@W8ASA4 жыл бұрын
Date on the film is 1965. MCMLXV
@gijr20034 жыл бұрын
M = 1000 CM = 900 LX = 60 V = 5 1965 We are now MMXX.
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
в великой америке в1966году гаубица 203мм ипаладин используют картузное заряжание паладин использует досих пор модификация а7 2020год
@mr.scruffydog49614 жыл бұрын
Love these old tech cold war films. Intense manual labor, time consuming human input on dials, wheels, jacks, weather vanes, trucks, hoists, bolts, ratchets, hammers...all for just one lousy shot! Gotta like the narrators too - machine gun delivery and puurfeckt dickshun!
@TheFastshelby2 жыл бұрын
Pro tip. It's actually the same way now. Just more accurate
@irgski4 жыл бұрын
Is the Cruise missile now part of the artillery armament?
@angrypatriot53924 жыл бұрын
The MLRS is. I dont remember if those are capable of firing cruise missiles or not but seems like I read something that said it was. I coould be wrong though.
@alexgoncalves48713 жыл бұрын
Eu sou fã do exército milita Americano Estados Unidos
@Pjay4444 жыл бұрын
lol watch one of the rifles fall of the rack at 19:35 because of the recoil , they thought no one would notice in the edit, lol
@TheNemo654 жыл бұрын
Anybody noticed nobody was wearing a ear protection?
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
@Dave WHAT?!
@michaelrussell4994 жыл бұрын
I was attached to a Lance battalion
@michaelrussell4993 жыл бұрын
Gomack Mc I started out 6/33 lance.. moved to the 9th missile group. Barracked in the 1/12.
@CaptainZero26411 жыл бұрын
Germans done crazy things as well in field of artillery. One prime example was the 80cm Dora Railgun
@subscribeplease48754 жыл бұрын
Big for nothing railgun
@13thBear3 жыл бұрын
Massive waste of resources, (manufacturing, materials and manpower,) for little return on effectiveness.
@NeoSovrnson Жыл бұрын
@@13thBear Perhaps overall, however, it did help to crack the stout defenses of Sebastopol during Barbarossa. Those piercing Rockling (Sp)? shells, you know?
@NeoSovrnson Жыл бұрын
80cm? Try 800cm. Guys could actually crawl around inside the tube and clean it. Yeah, Dora was big.
@longphamvan46424 жыл бұрын
Nhược điểm của pháo 175 ly , vya chuến trường là bắn qua chậm ... thua xa phái 130 ly của Liên Xô củ , nên đấu phâo đaaus không lại pháo130 ly
@davidradtke37784 жыл бұрын
71-74, 2nd & 39th FA 3rd ID.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
105самоходснята думали ее заменит м60 но их порезали щас только немног на шасси страйкер итока прямо наводкой
@TheFastshelby2 жыл бұрын
Those direct arty on targets are staaaaaaaaaaaaged. No way any round would take that long to hit at that distance
@dragonmaster38017111 жыл бұрын
what is the helicopter model? at 22:52
@davidhwang42214 жыл бұрын
Late to the party but I think it's a Sikorsky S-56
@laurencethornblade11954 жыл бұрын
@@davidhwang4221 Yes l believe you are correct. Called the Mojave. I think it has a piston engine. Long ass time ago
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
S-56 was the company designation of the helo. The military designation was CH-37 Mojave for those wondering. It was basically obsolete when it entered service. Only used until turbo-shaft heavy-lift helicopters could be developed to replace it like the Skycrane. Interesting tidbit of info: There WAS a variant of the CH-56 used as an Airborne Early Warning platform. Basically replaced the cargo bay with a radar system.
@Useruser-qs6oe4 жыл бұрын
на 105мм поршневойзатвор открывается вручную убожество от которого отказались на советских пушкахокончательно к 1960году
@HieuYangHo4 жыл бұрын
Ông cha chúng tôi vẫn sống vs chiến đấu hết mình để đổi hoà bình như ngày hôm nay
@jojonesjojo89194 жыл бұрын
I understand that artillery is the king of the battlefield, but I just don't get a sense of how the whole thing merges together...arti, tanks, grunts.. anyone have a link to a good explanation video?
@m.redleg2524 жыл бұрын
Tankers and infantry get their asses kicked then call the King to save them.
@BeelzebulKlendathu4 жыл бұрын
I want automatic 406mm infantry support cannon.
@BeelzebulKlendathu4 жыл бұрын
For home defence obviously.
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
такую делал грабин но неполучилось
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
да
@BeelzebulKlendathu4 жыл бұрын
@@user-xb2jm9ms4d именно 406-мм автоматическую? К своему стыду пока даже не прочитал его мемуары, впрочем не факт, что там об этом есть.
@akalksander91844 жыл бұрын
Boy those rocket batteries were labor intensive & time consuming. No doubt those artillery men were happy when they came up w/ the MLRS.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Speaking as an MLRS crewman...eh...it basically just turned us into infantry units. There's been very little need for MLRS batteries in recent conflicts. In fact, in the 3 years I spent in Iraq, not once did we ever bring, or use, out field pieces, and I served in both Paladin and MLRS units.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
@pyrotechnic5254 ...what?
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
@pyrotechnic5254 If you're talking about the TMDP that didn't demil the launchers...just the older missiles, with most of them being reconstituted into new systems. The MLRS and HIMARS are both still in active service...so I have no idea what you're talking about. In fact MLRS is getting an upgrade. Wherever you're getting your info from, it's bad info.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
@pyrotechnic5254 you can probably still find the slide show from it online. Was a big thing that went out around 2015ish. They had to reconstitute the old missiles because the fuel can only be contained in them safely for so long before it's dangerous to handle them, nevermind fire them. Plus with the new upgrades, they came with new missile systems, so there was little need to keep the older ones around save for training maybe, if they weren't too old.
@mandoramirez12054 жыл бұрын
Could a self propelled artillery piece use it's gun in defense of it's self say against another tank?
@jackbelk85274 жыл бұрын
No, the tank could fire all it's ammo while the SP was setting spades. Direct fire in ambush is done.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Yes, they can, and have...in Desert Storm and at least once that I know of in 2003 during OIF. The unit I first went to was a Paladin unit. They had some encounters during the initial invasion of Iraq where direct fire was needed. Source: Was a field artilleryman from 2005 to 2013.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
@@jackbelk8527 you don't need the spade to fire directly. You do need it when you plan on sustained fire. The Paladin is quite capable of taking out tanks if need absolutely needs to.
@leonsoboleski2969 Жыл бұрын
@@jackbelk8527 You don’t know Jack! Jack.
@richmanwisco Жыл бұрын
You could, but it would probably just piss off the tank even in the unlikely event you could hit it.
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
м 101м из за отсутствия нормальног вертолет а вдесантно ваорианте соднобрусным лафетом снижат сектор обтрела иархаично
@marke.56094 жыл бұрын
Honest John and little John....geez..way too complex and involvement in the field.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Not really...
@Jwj4004 жыл бұрын
Ok
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
попытка заряжать гаубицу унитарными снаядами несерьезна
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
Was the Sgt Major ever fired in anger?
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Nope. It was part of the nuclear deterrent and mostly deployed in Europe and Korea. They did consider producing HE, Biological, Chemical, and a few other variants but, they were never produced in any real quantity. The development of cruise missiles and more cost-effective field artillery platforms more or less made it obsolete.
@flxsptzr11 жыл бұрын
Looks like a Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave
@fragidistic4 жыл бұрын
1965
@jackbelk85274 жыл бұрын
Early. Didn't the stripes and name tags change color in spring '65?
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
203ягаубица выглядит вообщеубого наша б4развертывалась сходу ибила дотылинии манергейма а это надо разворачивать минуту
@ronaldrenken57374 жыл бұрын
HQ AND HQ BATTERY
@user-rw8er6tm8w4 жыл бұрын
黃皮膚族也有機甲車会海航,未來必可機甲車大軍遠洋海战海盜,,,So。
@cojones85184 жыл бұрын
19:33 Traverse dude forgot to secure the rifle rack for recoil.
@chrisbrent74874 жыл бұрын
The date at the start of the video in Roman numerals says 1965 and not 1966.
@nicholastenaza9913 жыл бұрын
I was in a 175MM self propelled gun unit and arrived in Vietnam in October of 1965. B Btry 2nd Battalion 32 Artillery. I went from Fort Sill, Ok with the unit on the USS Gordon.
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Cool story.
@josephhurdman55882 жыл бұрын
Why do they use metric measurements?
@richmanwisco Жыл бұрын
Because the rest of the world, particularly NATO with whom we needed a common standard, does. And the metric system is a much easier method to deal with tactically.
@twztwz69534 жыл бұрын
แจ๋ว
@secundinovallejos42534 жыл бұрын
Q raro q enventaron cañones de repetision automático
@wes11bravo4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the booms, gun bunnies!
@user-xb2jm9ms4d4 жыл бұрын
м114 тот же поршневойзатвор откотрого всср отказались на д20 сразупосле войны 1946а амеры 20лет возились идосих пор на паладине и м 777 стоит
@vika48584 жыл бұрын
амеры артой не марочились у них главное в-52.
@Useruser-qs6oe4 жыл бұрын
@@vika4858 cкока было сколько сбили
@Colinke10 жыл бұрын
Why skip the M40 "Long Tom"?
@jari20186 жыл бұрын
Too heavy , Swedes used in bandkanon
@WhiskeyRichard.4 жыл бұрын
@@jari2018 bandkanon? As in, "doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo doo doo BANG!" ?
@nickborromeo93604 жыл бұрын
@@WhiskeyRichard. what is a bandkanon??
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Because the M40 left service duty shortly after Korea. Probably wasn't being fielded anymore by the time the film was made.
@sammyzonna80454 жыл бұрын
get ready for nam
@gahong94664 жыл бұрын
Vũ khí Mỹ tôi tan vậy mà vẫn thua Việt Nam
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
FORT SILL OKLAHOMA I presume...
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
Most of it yeah. It was a shithole then, it's still a shithole now.
@richmanwisco Жыл бұрын
Pretty much, except for the missile shots. Those were probably from White Sands.
@kongoubongo11142 жыл бұрын
CONVENTIONAL OR NUCLEAR
@dinhvantuan43134 жыл бұрын
Viet Nam 😍
@ClivePotts-ns5hdАй бұрын
I gather that the US Marines in Melbourne do not even have this. It's pathetic...