Numbers on Belts | Beltmatic | S1 E1

[@cylewhittington5]

I like this game but I think I like watching more than playing it 😅

[@LyuboRyuk]

36:13 Very good split! Much better system. Time to produce is important.

[@MegaManNetworkOfCourse]

Ayoo, this game looks sweet. Cant wait to try it for myself!

[@thecelestialbeast]

Yup, it is quite fun. Also found out that the same developers have a very similar that is played in a hexagonal pattern called "Beltex". It is currently on sale for a fourth of the price of Beltmatic as I'm typing this.

[@MegaLokopo]

Anyone know how to make this game more fun later on? it is far too easy once you unlock exponentiation, add numbers to get 10 use exponentiation to get to 100 or 1000 or 10000, then multiply each one by the right digit so for 23456 multiply 2 by 10000, 3 by 1000, 4 by 100, 5 by 10, and add 6 to all of those numbers and duplicate the structure a few times, and then this is the most boring idle game ever. Does it ever get more complex?

[@thecelestialbeast]

I suppose the best way to make it fun later on would be to challenge yourself with various restrictions. Like for example selecting three numbers with a random number generator, and then try to make the big number sourced only from those extractors. Though that could eventually just boil down to finding the fastest way to get a 10 and the first few prime factors when you get used to it, I think it could grant that extra "spark" for a while.

[@MegaLokopo]

@@thecelestialbeast That would be fun, but I would rather have the game have the restriction instead of me being the only thing that enforces the restriction.

[@thecelestialbeast]

True that. I hope the game gets such updates. A challenge mode or something.

[@MegaLokopo]

@@thecelestialbeast yea, or just a counter and the game starts out with wanting 10 1's, and every ten items it increases the number.

[@thedudehimself69420]

Maybe try not relying too much on powers of 10. For example, I needed to make 3597. Instead of (3*1000)+(5*100)+(9*10)+3, I used 3*((12*100)-1)

[@WhiterockFTP]

produces 6s to produce 9s to produce 27s to add to 9 to get 36… just multiply 6 times 6? 🥲

[@thecelestialbeast]

Oh.... True XD

[@LyuboRyuk]

Complete all challenges using only ones. Find a way to speed up the calculations without creating a mess.