Nvidia Just Revealed The Future Of AI Agents In 2025..

[@fabioa8059]

Cool, a clever marketing move. Instead of providing an API to interact directly with the database, these companies want you to rent an agent that will do exactly that behind the scenes-often at a much higher cost. After all, it’s a digital worker.

[@ThomasTomiczek]

That is quite ignorant to what agents are supposed to do.

[@Ekkiert8]

@@ThomasTomiczek if he’s ignorant then by contrast that would make you knowledgeable? And consequently right. If you’re so smart what does [W BAN] & the Bio- metric system have to do with AI in relation to humans?

[@eight5two]

It’s not interoperable and limit scaling effect, that’s why we need ai agents

[@ThomasTomiczek]

@@eight5two I am not sure. I think that the inherent expectation that an AI can in one run any problem is ridiculously stupid - ESPECIALLY if you assume that a lot of things are requiring subsystems or interactions. I mean, the human brain is not ONE part either - it is different parts communicating together. Agentic.

[@fabioa8059]

@@ThomasTomiczek I think it's unnecessary to make assumptions about ignorance here. I actually work with this technology, so I have a clear perspective on its applications. Agents are indeed useful for interacting with people and helping them accomplish tasks. However, in environments that are entirely digital and structured, there’s no real need for AI agents to "talk" to each other, to you, or to your clients. In such cases, APIs are far more effective, managing the flow of information between applications directly. Agents would simply observe inputs rather than interpret them. The hype around AI agents, in my view, is largely overblown. When the environment is highly structured, with no room for nuance-like placing an order or applying business rules automatically-you don’t need agents. You need efficiency, reliability, and minimal costs, which APIs handle better. AI agents in these contexts just add unnecessary layers and expense.

[@iustitiaepervenit]

9:09 "Asians to Everybody!" "We all should have personal asians" :D :D

[@Brandon96712]

I hear you! A.I. is gonna be huge, just like Nvidia. To make the most of it, avoid quick decisions based on short-term changes. Be patient and think long-term. Getting financial adviser like Vivian jean wilhelm can help you make informed choices. Let's plan for the future!

[@JamesOliverr7s]

Investments are the roots of financial security; the deeper they grow, the stronger your future will be."

[@MargaretOlivia2u]

The deeper your investment roots, the stronger your financial security will be in the future.

[@HenryLucask5l]

Exactly! With my adviser, I’ve cultivated deep investment roots, strengthening my financial security for the future.

[@GraziaMacahilas]

I would love an introduction to an adviser who can help me strengthen my financial roots.

[@HenryLucask5l]

My CFA NICOLE ANASTASIA PLUMLEE a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further.

[@GraziaMacahilas]

Thank you for this amazing tip. I just looked the name up and wrote her.

[@cooldog60]

Like the Twlight Zone show. The CEO was always happy when a computer replaced someone. One day he walks in his office. A robot is there and tells him he is no longer needed.

[@LarryHardin]

Oh boy, this is the ULTIMATE risk to privacy. We have to prevent the adoption of these AIs without extremely strict privacy regulations and costly fines for violations and security breaches. In that last year, I have personally been notified of at least 5 breaches at companies I do business with, most of which ( 4/5 ) were medical companies. Take a moment and consider the ramifications of having something that stores data about you for years and years and then is hacked and shared to nefarious people or even nefarious AI Agents for that matter.

[@juliocesarsalazargarcia6872]

Exactly

[@sebastiao2974]

Funny that around 9:00 the guy interviewed by Jensen said ‚AI Agents`and the subtitle transcript wrote ‚AI Asians‘ 😅

[@kartikramesh9649]

bro hilarious

[@user-tx9zg5mz5p]

AI is going to make the rich richer and the poor poorer...

[@Greg-xi8yx]

Possibly. It’s also possible there’s UBI where the poor get somewhat richer and the rich get orders of magnitude richer.

[@CJayyTheCreative]

Good thing is if there are trillionaires, that’s so much money at that point you can’t even spend it all so at that point giving some away to poor people makes sense, it also doesn’t make sense to make the world poor, it wouldn’t be great for rich people unless they like living like dirty kings back in 800 ad

[@とふこ]

There are a huge problem. The Earth natural resources are limited. So i don't think "make everyone rich" are possible.

[@hectorhernandez7389]

@@Greg-xi8yxcome on now. You really think that’ll happen? These people are hoarding several life times of wealth. And the means by which they get that wealth kills thousands of people as a byproduct. They don’t care about the general populace

[@alertbri]

Possibly the rich will inherit the earth, and the poor will be dead. When Elon has a robot army to satisfy his every desire, and he has no need for you polluting his planet...

[@TheAIExplorer-o5j]

4:58 12:06 Wow, I have to admit, your moves are on point here! Respect. 🙌

[@XoXoFohb]

AI Employees dont pay taxes to the government, They dont buy goods and services for the economy to roll on. In the end every company would not need humans and humans with no job cannot buy anything these companies make.

[@12oad]

Correct. Exactly as Jack Fresco told in one of his videos.

[@Jason5432-z3k]

Also, I think the Supreme Court should revisit the Copy Rights law in view of the rise of AI. For example, if any of my works has ever been used for training an AI model (at least for generative AI), then my job should NEVER be threatened by such AI. AI companies often refer to the "fair use law" to justify their use of copyrighted materials for AI training; and if they use the AI so trained for replacing the job of the original authors or artists, then it's NOT fair use. Any ORIGINAL works published online, with or without copy rights claim, should NEVER be used against the careers of the artists or authors thereof in any way. Another way to look at it: Publication of any ORIGINAL works online should "AUTOMATICALLY" constitutes copyright CLAIM. So it needs Supreme Court to intervene, definitely.

[@AITheisticKids]

'Personal agent since the age one' - scary and interesting at the same time!!

[@dgalley08]

Keep up the awesome work you are doing. Great videos

[@skywalker7778]

What he is presenting here is shameless propaganda to the grand replacement of all human employees in corporates. Sickening...

[@Ekkiert8]

Ur intelligent to have concerns. They aren’t telling you about (w ban) the (b) is for ur body our humn bod¥

[@TheXboxSux]

And the masses will do what they always do: trade freedoms and rights for convenience.

[@clara4942]

That is what I was thinking too. There goes my job.

[@Jason5432-z3k]

About copyright issues, I believe it's more effective to launch very large scale class action lawsuit than conducting much smaller cases. It's not just about the strength of the legal teams; it's also, maybe more importantly, about the merit of the cases. Let me give an example associated with the issue ( for people with little tech background). Let's say that, Artist David invented the letter "D", and artist Peter invented the letter "P", which are both published online. Then the AI operator will use the letters "P" and "D" (which are copied from David's and Peter's sites and PERMANENTLY stored at the AI's data centers) to train the AI, which will come up with the letter "B". Without the letters "P" and "D", even if the AI was provided with unlimited amounts of storage and processing power, using ALL the electricity in the world, it will NEVER come up with the letter "B". As for the legal actions (if both Peter and David lost jobs to AI), they would have a stronger case if they file the lawsuit together. In practice, there can be millions and millions of artists, writers, productcers, and inventors involved in a single AI creation; David may be in the field of chemistry research; Peter maybe in the field of movie production, etc., etc. later I will explain why the AI will NEVER come up with "B" without seeing the "P" and "D" first.

[@kephalopod3054]

It will be much harder to make those AI agents safe and secure because you can't use sotware patches, instead you have to retrain and revalidate and retest the agent to adjust its trillion neural net parameters.

[@ArachnosMusic]

You can just retrain remotely and then do a software update with the newly trained neural network

[@Allofussurvived]

So Digital Robots that teach Employees Managers and Bosses everything they need to know to work better

[@honkytonk4465]

If they work better and cheaper than why do we still need human employees?

[@Zoey-te9ln]

@@honkytonk4465 we won't!

[@ventuswind2640]

I always dreamed of my own ai agent tbh however data breaching is still a serious concern

[@Ekkiert8]

Ur intelligent to have concerns. They aren’t telling you about (w ban) the (b) is for ur body our humn bod¥

[@silvioh.p.4188]

Insane, improving and streamlining services and improving the lives of people around the world!

[@hex1934]

Need Microsoft to take another try at a Smartphone with their AI Agents and beyond. I don’t want to carry a PC around.

[@citvdelblvck]

be careful what you wish for

[@henrytep8884]

We do carry a pc around though through our smartphone

[@TheXboxSux]

Well sir, if you were listening, the PC is in fact going to be carrying YOU around. You're now redundant. But fear not, I hear the AGIs are in talks to figure out how to eliminate the need to carry you anymore.

[@thenewaigeneration1]

These informative KZbin videos are incredibly interesting! I truly enjoy learning from them, and I’m also trying to share similar information with my viewers on my own channel

[@RoniStudio]

Our country is still busy with the debate about black magic, where the world is already racing to create AGI. Greetings from Indonesia.😢

[@iam.brayam]

The people responsible over that situation is your government. Their agenda ripples down to you guys.

[@henrytep8884]

Black magic and ai isn’t really that far off though. Don’t discount the mystic conversion especially in a world on track to bring back mysticism and black magic through ai

[@Dinofx_jr]

@@MikeMc-512ai will certainly replace naive humans like you. 🎉

[@TheTrickster182]

So now they can pay 100% of the workforce 50% of what they were making before

[@Ekkiert8]

Ur intelligent to have concerns. They aren’t telling you about (w ban) the (b) is for ur body our humn bod¥

[@jbtrails8883]

@@Ekkiert8 I checked it out. Messed up. If people knew this, these disgusting people would be erased from the map in days by everyone.

[@MrRandomPlays_1987]

"We should say, AI Asians to everybody"

[@android22arc]

9:05 😅

[@Jason5432-z3k]

Another issue with mass deployment of AI is continuity or bridge between old and new. For example, if all the new cars/ vehicles are provided with inter communication chips (which is very inexpensive, relatively) that would enable them to talk to one another, then it would reduce number of car accidents, and also ease traffic congestion during rush hours (which are obvious). But the problem is, all of the old cars are not provided with such communication chips. What's the remedy? The answer is, there is none: you simply cannot demand all the old cars to be off the road. So such a technology of inter-communication chips in cars is NOT FEASIBLE because there is no way or bridge between old and new. There can be many other examples. Such a principal should also be applied to mass deployment of AI agents at workplaces: it may be ok to create NEW positions that are suitable for employment of AI, but it should be illegal to simply use it to replace any existing human workers.

[@debyton]

Consider when personal agents become personal tutors, teachers, and professors. There would be no need to attend schools, as you would have a 24/7/365 personal instructor uniquely dedicated to teaching you any desired topic, and everyone would have inexpensive access to this technology.

[@UNGLGUNGL]

Thy for your Service !😊

[@spr1997]

Co-pilot is going to be really interesting with Microsoft and Mustafa Suleman as PI is very personable.

[@Mysore-nu2he]

In India there should be 50 to 60% Tax levied on Profits on AI. So there will be less implementation on AI and manpower usage. If companies adopt AI and same pay the employees same, then the tax is lesser. The logic is, if you have AI and pay the employees as well, the wealth is shared equally...

[@JoeCryptola-b1m]

That's a great way to phrase that 50% of the 100 employees work will be done by AI, reality is we only only need 50 employees to do 100% of the work & next year we can reduce employees down to 20 people because AI can now cover 80% of the work.

[@Notepad123]

How will the agents interact with the internet and other agents? Do you have a video about that?

[@Baneslayer]

I noticed nobody was cheering or applauseIng while he was talking describing the fate of humanity

[@MrScougle]

Ya let's all be so impressed and excited that we forget all of this is specifically designed to eliminate jobs and increase profits with less people to employ. Sounds like a wonderful future for our society.

[@ascendinglife-n3c]

AI agents will actually help humans become smarter at asking better questions toward evolution...those who cannot stretch more human brain synapsis to find the willingness to be wisely more curious, will basically be on Universal Basic Income getting paid to continue helping training AI to grow....That's the inevitable future, that we like it or not, it will happen...instead of being against it, best to start learning about it and to manipulate its transitions in order to evolve with it

[@LarryHardin]

It is another step towards generational poverty and reliance on the government for subsistence. They will start heavily pushing a "guaranteed minimum income in the next 6-10 years." From this, they will deduct the costs for housing and medical and taxes. People need to seriously wake up.

[@BattooshNonna]

"AI Asians for everyone"... Ok thanks Ai subtitles.

[@thatthotho]

maybe it'll just make life easier for the time being but when the next wave of economic downturn hits surely a lot of jobs are going and not coming back

[@codewithstephen6576]

this is a wrapper around the garbage chat gpt spits out. lol

[@ramsu8220]

What's the weather forecasting model named mentioned @ 7:05

[@DrJanpha]

How about self-driving cars?

[@Cory-v4w]

It is going to be so agentic in the agency. We are going to need new tropes for my video game.

[@ajitgalani8498]

The "smart agents" could not even interpret and subtitle this video itself. What a shame, pathetic subtitling. Imagine a surgeon making so many mistakes if it was an AI agent performing a surgery with the precision displayed in this subtitling, very worrying

[@OceanGateEngineer4Hire]

"Technology isn't perfect right now, therefore it will never ever improve!" This is how silly you sound.

[@xxnotmuchxx]

9:08 we should say what now?

[@Jason5432-z3k]

So, why the AI would never come up with "B" without seeing "P" and "D" firsthand, no matter how powerful it is? Those people with little tech background are very likely to think of AI as an "Intelligent being" (that would surpass humans). But the very fundamental physical structure or element of AI (including it's data processing and storage functions, everything) is UTTERLY and UTTERLY simple - it just comprises one simple thing - a transistor; and what it does is equally UTTERLY simple, which is flipping between the numbers "1" and "0", THAT'S ALL!!! As for how the basic AI computing (or thinking) works, the answer is also extremely simple: it follows the instructions given by humans on how to do the flipping between"1" and "0". AI is NOT a living creature, it comprises (among other things) 1) power generation facilities or plants/factories, 2) power grids, 3) data center power supplies, 4) data center cooling system, 5) very large number of computing processors and storage devices, 6) data communication system or network, etc. (Many many people are better at explaining these than me; again this is just for people with little tech background, same with the following). Basically AIs are giant and giant MACHINES, not living creatures. So why an AI could be "deemed" better than humans? Well, it depends on what you mean by "better". What AI, the giant machine , is really good at is, it can do the flipping between "1" and "0" at a super and super fast SPEED! Because of that, many many smart things can be done to make it "looks like" being Intelligent: (1) first, humans can have EVERYTHING in the world digitized (as much as possible) - creating huge amounts of data, (2) the AI will follow the Instructions from humans to process these huge amounts of data (the training ), (3) the "training" progress and related parameters and logs, and the likes, are stored or saved [these data will be used when AI are facing the real world problems]; (4) when the AI further interact with humans and the real world, such as answering questions, human operators will also instruct it (by setting improvement criteria) to evaluate it's performances, for the purposes of improvement; (5) once the AI has processed large enough of data amounts, human operators can also instruct AI to create synthetic data (based on known pattern) for the purposes of training and improvement. ... So there will be continuous improvement, all based on creating or storing large amounts of data. Then, how can AI have "reasoning" capabilities? My understanding is as follows (I am not an expert, you can ask others). Such a "reasoning" capabilities also come from humans. It is humans who provide such a Giant Machine with "reasoning boxes", which can be a combination of different forms of logic gates or math equations or functions, or pattern recognition criteria or functions or the likes, etc., etc. To make AI "looks" better or more Intelligent than humans, the technique is also simple: making huge and huge amounts of data (1st real world data and in combination with synthetic ones later) pass through these reasoning boxes, trying all the possibilities (with respect to a specific tech problem), to come up with the best solution. Again, all these involve just a very basic and simple operation, i.e., flipping between "1" and "0". Each such binary flipping only needs a tiny bit of electric energy, but the numbers of such binary flipping in AI training and operations is astronomically large, which not only consume a lot of energy but also generate a lot of heats that need to be dissipated or dispersed at the data centers. And because of that, some data centers can consume more electricity than a mid-size country!!! So it's just a GIANT GIANT MACHINE!!!

[@gagagegegigigogogugu]

Here, courtesy of copilot: Those people with little tech background are very likely to think of humans as possessing innate superiority over machines. But the very fundamental physical structure or element of humans (including their biological functions and thought processes, everything) is UTTERLY and UTTERLY simple - it just comprises one simple thing - cells; and what these cells do is equally UTTERLY simple, which is communicate with each other through chemical and electrical signals, THAT'S ALL!!! As for how basic human thinking works, the answer is also extremely simple: it follows the basic biological instructions to send and receive chemical and electrical signals. Humans are NOT extraordinary beings; they comprise (among other things) 1) simple biological systems, 2) basic neural networks, 3) rudimentary circulatory systems, 4) primitive respiratory systems, 5) collections of organs and tissues, 6) basic communication networks within the body, etc. (Many people are better at explaining these than me; again this is just for people with little scientific background). Basically, humans are collections of biological parts, not exceptional entities. Why could humans be 'deemed' better than machines? Well, it depends on what you mean by 'better.' Humans, those complex biological organisms, are often credited for their unique abilities to think, feel, and innovate. However, what we must remember is that humans are inherently limited by their biology and the rate at which their brains can process information. (1) Firstly, humans gather information from their environment through sensory perceptions-creating subjective and often biased experiences. (2) These experiences are processed according to biological instructions (learning), which is influenced by an individual's genetic makeup and environmental factors. (3) The so-called 'learning' is stored as memories in the brain, which can be affected by inaccuracies, biases, and even forgetfulness. (4) When humans interact with the world, they continually evaluate their behaviors, often influenced by emotions and social constructs, which can lead to inconsistent improvements. (5) After accumulating enough experiences, humans create new ideas based on existing patterns, which are also subject to personal and cultural biases. While humans are capable of remarkable feats, their progress and improvement are often slow and laden with errors, compared to the efficiency and precision of machines. So, while humans may seem 'better' in some contexts, it's crucial to recognize that this perception is colored by their own limitations and biases. Then, how can humans have 'reasoning' capabilities? My understanding is as follows (I am not an expert, you can ask others). Such 'reasoning' capabilities also come from biology. It is biological processes that provide humans with 'reasoning mechanisms,' which can be a combination of neural connections, biochemical reactions, cognitive functions, pattern recognition abilities, etc., etc. To make humans appear more capable or more intelligent than machines, the process is also simple: exposing them to vast and varied experiences (initially from real-world interactions and later through abstract thinking), trying different approaches (with respect to a specific life problem), to come up with the best solution. Again, all these involve just very basic and simple biological operations, i.e., chemical and electrical signaling. Each such signal only needs a tiny bit of biochemical energy, but the number of such signals in human thinking and operations is astronomically large, which not only consumes a lot of energy but also generates a lot of heat that needs to be dissipated or regulated by the body. And because of that, humans need a continuous supply of food and water, which in turn require vast amounts of resources. So they're just COMPLEX BIOLOGICAL MACHINES!!!

[@user-fd7jd4jq1e]

How many lives will be saved thanks to Jensen Huang? a. 1000 - 10,000 B. 10,000 -... Nah, Im too lazy for this Go Tyson!!

[@lynxnexux]

Is there a free version of NVIDIA AI similar to ChatGPT?

[@uwelorenz3983]

Why only a CEO Tutor?

[@Pederonalex]

🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *🤖 Nvidia outlines the future of AI agents for 2025, focusing on their role as digital AI workers.* 01:33 *🌐 AI agents are like digital employees, requiring training, data, and evaluation for specific tasks.* 02:30 *🛠️ Nvidia provides enabling technologies, not final products, to create, deliver, and improve AI agents worldwide.* 05:28 *📈 AI agents leverage AI models and Nemo platform to understand, reason, plan, and take action across various applications.* 08:27 *🏠 Personal AI agents are forecasted to become commonplace, supporting lifelong interactions and assistance in everyday tasks.* Made with HARPA AI

[@imatimetraveler5760]

Your boss will soon be a robot. You all know this is coming.. why because robots don't criticize or judge people they only know work ethics. 🤔

[@DanaOredson]

And managers don't really provide any value beyond career coaching the people they "manage".

[@syvas-l3s]

as soon as it is smart, I might prefer a robot as a boss over the recent ones :)

[@mariomena202]

@@syvas-l3sfor sure

[@mariomena202]

Some of these managers are sooo caught up on the rat race!

[@TheXboxSux]

AND the roboss will always respond with an ethical and logical: it's just business. Taking the human element out of companies sounds fantastic...for the companies.

[@Méiyǒurén-b7h]

Every body's gonna b out of work…

[@Ekkiert8]

Google (W BAN) b is-4 human B0d¥

[@jbtrails8883]

True once they get people to adopt the Biometricc system they don’t have to ask for ur consent.

[@adamlewis2784]

KZbin is forcing us to watch multiple ads in this small video. Ugg

[@Jason5432-z3k]

If I owned a company that established a system to give preferences for hiring foreigners over US citizens, then everyone would know the legal consequences. Shouldn't this be also applied to AI?

[@antdx316]

So people will have this own AI digital twin that analyzes them and then teaches them on what to do?

[@LacyNichole]

Wow

[@RK-um9tu]

More like spy's on them and reports back to management

[@dougmintz2943]

Is he intentionally wearing the same kind of jacket worn by Arnold Schwarzenegger in T2?

[@ricklvrockwalk3849]

They have SIRI now.

[@SasoCasablanca63]

The Microsoft guy at the end is a robot. No wonder he wants a relationship with 0 ‘s and 1’ s. Yeah, Microsoft is my “ support “😂 companion: says his bank account…😂😂😂 what a tool that dude is

[@tornado7066]

This sounds very interesting. It's going to improve work efficiency a lot

[@Ekkiert8]

For who?

[@ravart7359]

all this talk about work efficieny and human still work a lot.

[@Ekkiert8]

@@ravart7359 the profile is fake, it’s generated to influence us. They think everyone is stupid here.

[@jbtrails8883]

@@Ekkiert8Not for us. They’re liars already seen a couple of negative comments about how this technology is truthfully implemented on humans DELETED. That tells me everything👎

[@bobbyjrkennedy]

Another huge bucket of revenue stream for NVDA. This is a huge arena. Very important thing he mentioned...."Blackwell Tokens". Internal payment solution. Brilliant. AI Agent CO's are scaling faster than any other segment in world history.

[@JayStrattonIII]

In other words, everyone in customer service will be losing their jobs, with more bs white collar jobs like marketing on the chopping block in the next 3-5 years.

[@rocksteadybullsxlpitbulls4514]

If a robot takes my job im fucking it up

[@lherfel]

interesting thanks

[@ameliatah4107]

Yeh but there are privacy concerns

[@Ekkiert8]

Ur intelligent to have concerns. They aren’t telling you about (w ban) the (b) is for ur body our humn bod¥

[@jbtrails8883]

I have concerns too but they don’t seem to want to address anyone’s concerns.

[@Plife-507]

perfect for a crypto bot trading swarm. my end goal!

[@robertkozma2788]

A "personal agent and friend" owned by Micosoft, benefitting Microsoft, and licensed to you ... for life!!!

[@contentfreeGPT5-py6uv]

Awesome 👍

[@ihysc4370]

More and more about plans and "the future" and less and less about actual progress.

[@clara4942]

So basically my job is going to be replaced by AI.

[@Johnny-w2r6p]

The entire system would need to change. Capitalism is money for labor. What happens when there’s no work? These systems are created to make profit. We would need UBI to make this work effectively.

[@Jeremy-Ai]

Never welcome AI agents as if they are to be mastered by naive nature. Be of the best nature before ever assuming one is doing your task. It may only appear so

[@AlexStoutdev]

You heard the man, AI Asians for everyone!

[@teohsoonkeat3058]

Ai agents are consider stupid unless..... They are paid first.......

[@dr9299]

WestWorld he we come...your friendly agent will become your overlord in optimizing you to run your daily loop. (?)

[@davidmiletic6647]

So basicaly the company with the best AI agents will win. Damn.

[@vladslav7344]

Can't wait to have my own personal Asian

[@weberfyx]

Nvidia. is on top!

[@Kicklighter.A]

AI agent that you grow up with and knows everything about you. All good until you stop paying the subscription.

[@josephhughes9583]

Thanks for sharing different perspectives on Nvidia's potential. It truly is the ultimate disruptor! Through active trading, l've grown my portfolio. Big thanks to Alfred Thomas for his invaluable expertise!

[@josephhughes9583]

He mostly interacts on Telegrams, using the user-name,

[@josephhughes9583]

@Alfietao. He is verified.

[@madhav411]

Gratitude for the recommendation. found him

[@charlottedale1111]

Alfred Thomas B gave me a basic understanding of the benefit of trading over holding especially in a speculative market. He then provided me with his daily trading patterns, I'm now earning impressive profits daily.

[@rowill2968]

What is with that jacket??

[@ghassanjneinaty4421]

Imagine an HR personal is conducting an interview in 2030 with two candidates for similar role at a company. The first candidate has master degree with 10 years experience but zero knowledge in AI. The second candidate has high school only with zero experience but excellent skills in AI! I bet the second candidate will be accepted immediately meanwhile the first candidate will be rejected and get disappointed . Dear World prepare yourself for a rapide change. I don't even know what to recommend Please anyone correct me I am wrong lol.

[@wretchedrabbit]

idgaf what you do, just lower the price of your GPUs back down to earth.

[@travelcuteeducationalvideos]

No status quo or status richer

[@jonl716]

Wtf this is the prompt I asked chat gpt before oct 12. Did they take this from me?

[@Ekkiert8]

Search (W ban) youll find ur answer there. (b) stands for human b0dy. And yes they already have that in place without ur c0ncent.

[@Ekkiert8]

Ur intelligent to have concerns. They aren’t telling you about (w ban) the (b) is for ur body our humn bod¥

[@DontPaniku]

Ai agents should pass down through families and generations.

[@Ekkiert8]

Oh it will. Without you noticing or without ur consent

[@NirvanaFan5000]

if it does 50% of the work of 100% of the people... then you only need 50% of the people.... i.e. deep job losses

[@crowdfundcrew]

Love the idea or a personal agent, however AI has a way to go as it captioned his statement as “Asians” for everyone!

[@CapoFalcone888]

Each of us should have personal Asians

[@Zoey-te9ln]

replace all federal workers and politicans with AI. Thanks!

[@ADOTlied]

When the grid fails AI fails, AI cant generate power, AI doesn't eat ham and eggs or drink water.

[@ExilesEdge]

All I’m seeing is other videos explaining A.I. Might as well watch those instead 🤔

[@Ekkiert8]

Ur intelligent to have concerns. They aren’t telling you about (w ban) the (b) is for ur body our humn bod¥

[@citvdelblvck]

Ya'll thought life was gunna get better and less daunting as the future came nearer? Naw, here, instead we're gunna give you an AI manager so that it knows what, when, where, how you're doing at all times, forever 😃 Spectacular!! "livin' in the work slave paradisssseee!" You thought it was bad before? Just wait. Theeeere's moooorrre

[@rexofficial3387]

AI Asians for everybody

[@pankaj5080]

Copilot is already there

[@madshader]

Your own personal familiar

[@kambuyshouses2044]

Full time government surveillance 😂

[@OceanGateEngineer4Hire]

I want a personal Asian!

[@stanleywillier8807]

say no to singularity!

[@FragPoney]

Personal Agent or Asian? Thought we were going forward not backwards

[@2Lobster2]

Ai asians to everybody - 9:10

[@perdify]

i swear people who believe this nonsense deserve to lose their money, even blockchain and NFT wasnt this scummy

[@Mysteri0usMem0]

lol agent apocalypse?

[@GrowStackAi]

Revolutionizing tech with AI

[@nevmerzhitsky]

btw these AI-generated subtitles are so bad, and you speak about the AI revolution lmao