O.J. SIMPSON'S NEAR COLLISION IN THE BRONCO WITH JILL SHIVELY ALMOST GOT HIM CAUGHT!

[@nikkix2896]

Her story has been consistent for 30yrs and YES the other driver in the gray car was spoken to and they confirmed the incident.They just chose to stay anonymous

[@horror_2s]

Thank you! I appreciate your time.

[@philipwilliams1754]

Lie's a convicted liar and a fraudster.Her family was on TV discrediting her.She didn't own a car.Convieniently the supermarket was closed.

[@donovans6472]

but kato kaelin says he heard the three thumps at 10:40pm.....so either her or kato is lying about something because there is a conflict in time here.... how could o.j be at two places at once.

[@commentedrelationship]

Hello, I'm looking for a source that the man in the gray Nissan was spoken to. Do you have a source for this?

[@canton731]

​@commentedrelationship YES, because they could have come forward and asked for anonymity. Her story would have more credibility if the other driver could corroborate her account.

[@septube26]

She's telling the truth, OJ was coming from the murder scene.

[@TELACASTERMCG]

I was driving the Nissan, I followed him for a short distance before losing him on Rockingham. They never called me to the stand either. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@nolagirl2458]

I don’t understand why both of y’all weren’t called to testify?!

[@SugoiEnglish1]

@@nolagirl2458 This lady wasn't because Marcia Clark thought being on TV and selling her story would compromise the case. She made a mistake.

[@victoriavancartier7379]

Wow 😲

[@daviddavis3389]

@@TELACASTERMCG rite!

[@RalphPalomo-qg8xm]

What a great interview with her! Excellent job

[@horror_2s]

Thanks brotha

[@leiakiki]

Kim Goldman interviewed Jill for her podcast on Wondery, it’s worth a listen.

[@kevinhensley4643]

Fascinating story, it adds to Nicole and Ron murders. We all knew who did it. Thank you for sharing.

[@donovans6472]

her time and kato's three thump hearing times are in conflict of each other

[@SugoiEnglish1]

​@@donovans6472 Marcia said in the Civil case 10:52 thumps occurred. Clearly, OJ explained in his "If I did It" his route that only his tennis friends knew of, that he stumbled near Katos's AC.

[@donovans6472]

@@SugoiEnglish1 I don't understand what you're trying to say...elaborate please... explain yourself

[@BigWilt2000]

Great interview. Thank you Jill for telling your story and long live Ron & Nicole

[@horror_2s]

Thank you for watching.

[@annemontanaro3795]

Thank you Jill for your courage and strength.

[@dennisrowan9700]

Courage and strength? What are you talking about. Shively blew it. California VW- driving redneck grabbed for the sleaze cash and helped undermine the prosecution of this case.

[@chrissyknowsitall5170]

I can't believe how horrible she was treated my Marsha Clark. The trial could of turned out different maybe if she could of taken the stand.

[@brian4019]

​@@chrissyknowsitall5170the jurors were presented with OJs blood at the scene, fibers from his car at the scene, blood from the victims in his car and in his house, and a matching glove on his property. That was not enough to sway them. I believe that Jill's testimony that she saw him in his car would have had zero effect on this trial.

[@mthivier]

Instead of of focusing her righteous indignation on Ms. Shively for talking to "Hard Copy", maybe Marsha Clark should have taken it up with the LAPD for leaking the witnesses' names to the press in the first place. Seems to me that it was they who put the case in jeopardy.

[@JR-rc1cg]

Could of been her friends that leaked the case. She was apparently desperate for money

[@tatyanamelnikoff9578]

she's not @ good l@wyer. go @he@d & fulfill them @c@demic requisites. go @he@d & t@ke th@t st@te ex@m. she still sucks @s @ l@wyer.

[@Heartboy1031]

Poor lady. That is a lot to go through. I hope she doesn't read these social media posts. She said she is at peace so why torture yourself reading comments from people calling you a "liar" and such. I wish her well . :-)

[@TrojanGoddess56]

What if OJ in his Bronco, in his big hurry to get back to Rockingham, had collided with and crashed into another person's vehicle that night, whether Shively or someone else in that intersection? It would have been either OJ doing a hit-and-run and fleeing with his Bronco, or, if his Bronco had been disabled and totaled, he could have been trapped inside, requiring rescue workers to pry him out with the "jaws of life", or, he would have got out of his Bronco to beat the crap out of the other driver, whether it was the other driver's fault or not. OJ was in a big rush to get home to Rockingham, to get into that limo to LAX to fly to Chicago that night as his alibi. What a different story it would have been if he had been in an accident after leaving Bundy, and had become trapped inside his totaled Bronco out on San Vicente.

[@canton731]

Sounds like a fantasy. 😒

[@cyberla]

Great interview! I know and live near these locations today. You need to create a true crime documentary editing course! 🙏

[@horror_2s]

I appreciate the kind words. Thank you!! I am working on the Tom Lange one next.

[@horror_2s]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kHeZdIhjmJiiasU

[@fredrickneitzche6748]

The defense fucked up in so many ways. Crazy how many lives were affected.

[@memorywarrior8752]

Think how relieved the defence must have been when Marcia Clarke decided not to use Jill Shively.

[@davechristopher6462]

Jill Shively was quietly "silenced $$$" by the state of California.

[@banker1313]

so why did Marcia Clark not get the transcript or recording of her call from 911?? they could have confirmed her story.

[@gametimegallery7661]

Apparently she called the police dept directly and didn’t use 911.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

​@@gametimegallery7661The problem is the police department had no record of her phone call to them.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

​@@gametimegallery7661The police department didn't have any record of her calling them.

[@gametimegallery7661]

@@SparkleInYourEyes2024 Detective Lange said in an interview that Shively called the police department 2-3 days after the murders. Not sure why you'd report a drunk driver 2-3 days after.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

@@gametimegallery7661Exactly. Seems like she just wanted her 15 minutes of fame

[@RECORDSAREFOREVER]

What a great interview…

[@horror_2s]

Thank you.

[@playcards4166]

CHARLIE EHRLICH is OJ S MURDER ACCOMPLICE.

[@beyolightner]

Can’t believe they didn’t use her in the trial. So sad he got away with it

[@kerry378]

So many peoples lives were affected by those two murders...its so tragic. The prosecution lost that case soley. Definitely corruption in that all the witness names were leaked.

[@Augfordpdoggie]

Great job on this

[@SmileAmerica-th7ye]

Marsha Clark threw this case on purpose

[@cyberla]

She was maybe overconfident lol

[@chrissyknowsitall5170]

RIP Nichole and Ron. Rest Easy now. The monster is dead. 🪽🕊🕯🪽🕊🕯🪽🕊🕯

[@shawnhallmon9245]

Great interview

[@horror_2s]

Thank you for watching!

[@garywhitlock6560]

Try not worry about it jill,you certainly didnt lose the case,that jury would not have convicted him if there had been a video of him doing it

[@brian4019]

Absolutely correct. Shively would have had no effect.

[@loki2stunt]

She traded gold for sand.... could've made millions like Kato instead she settled for a few grand from hardcopy

[@shawnhallmon9245]

I'm glad that she got to tell her story

[@nala3038]

Imagine if she collided with him?

[@ashleylin4980]

If you look up her grand jury testimony, she said she first called police on Tuesday, June 14th. At that point, everybody knew OJs license plate. In other interviews, she said she called the morning of Monday the 13th. And now in this interview she said she called before midnight the night of the 12th. It would be nice if this story was true, because OJ clearly did it. It’s just not. Somebody should fact check her statements.

[@SugoiEnglish1]

They did. She was going to be a key witness, but sold her story. So Marcia dropped her. Sounds like you weren't around then. I was.

[@brian4019]

@@SugoiEnglish1 the issue is, how do we know when Jill reported this, without just taking her word for it?

[@cyberla]

She seems very insecure and did not come across as a very credible witness.

[@philipwilliams1754]

Shively also claimed the incident took place at 10.58.

[@brian4019]

She said it was earlier: Q: SO YOU ARRIVED AT THE INTERSECTION OF 9 SAN VICENTE AND BUNDY AT 10:48 TO 10:50? A: RIGHT; YES. She had a green light and as she went through the intersection she saw OJ running a red light and almost hit her.

[@June12Nine4]

Mate, where do you get your information? Its embarrassing. You ought to be banned from commenting on this topic. Wow. 10:58. That is hilarious. Fine job too @brian4019 for the verbiage by the way. Sometimes these things are a necessity.

[@MarkDunn-uj8fm]

A nice lady,but defense attorney would have picked her apart

[@fauxgirl2197]

Excellent interview Jill !!! Does anyone know if they ever spoke to person in a Nissan car? Thank you for this interview… loved it.

[@baalbezub6848]

He never came forward, and was never identified.

[@ashleylin4980]

@@baalbezub6848wonder why…

[@canton731]

​@@baalbezub6848...and probably didn't exist.

[@davechristopher6462]

I'm convinced the state silenced her testimony. Other than his dream team he had help from other sources.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

Kato said he heard the thumps at 10:40 so how was she able to see OJ at 10:50? Prosecutors didn't put her on the stand because her time frame didn't add up.

[@ashleylin4980]

Yes, that and she made it all up.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

​@@ashleylin4980Exactly.

[@Reel-Justice]

The thumps occurred at 10:52pm. Kato left his room 2 minutes after thumps. Kato took 30 seconds to grab the pen flashlight from the dresser drawer and walk to the spot where Allan Park saw him. Park was on the phone with his boss so Park's time is irrefutably documented and so is the time of the thumps. Park hung up at 10:55:05pm. Park hung up 15 seconds after seeing Kato so Park saw Kato at 10:54:50pm. 10:54:50pm minus 2 minutes and 30 seconds equals 10:52:20pm when Kato heard the thumps. 10:50pm Jill saw AC in OJ's Bronco 10:52pm Thumps 10:54pm Park sees AC walk across OJ's driveway and into his house At 10:54pm, the knapsack with OJ's knife, bloody clothes and footwear is already on the ground located at the right rear tail light of Arnelle's car parked behind the Bentley. Arnelle did not go to a movie and she was lying. Park saw Arnelle's car parked behind the Bentley when he arrived at 10:22pm. Arnelle is Charlie. The person Park saw walk into the house at 10:54pm was wearing dark clothing. Park did not see OJ walk into the house at 10:54pm because OJ's knife, clothing and footwear are *already* in the knapsack on the ground behind Arnelle's car at 10:54pm. Park saw AC Cowlings walk into OJ's house at 10:54pm. The murders occurred at 9:59pm and Nicole's broken stopped *DATE* watch proves it. OJ made two staged alibi calls to Paula at 10:03pm when he was driving home from Nicole's. OJ was home at 10:06pm. OJ called AC to come to his house immediately and AC arrive before 10:15pm. AC drove off in OJ's Bronco to get rid of the knapsack and clean any blood in the Bronco before Park arrived at 10:22pm. This is why the Bronco was not there when Park arrived. AC went to Nicole's to try and find the glove and cap. When he didn't find it, a very angry AC raced back to OJ's and Jill saw AC in OJ's Bronco at 10:50pm. Park saw AC arrive at 10:54pm. When Park left for the airport the Bronco was now on Rockingham because AC arrived back at OJ's at 10:54pm. After OJ left in the limo at 11:10pm, AC planted the glove at the back of the wall because AC tried to ensure OJ would be convicted for the murders AC knew OJ committed. OJ knew AC planted the glove. OJ packed the glove in the knapsack along the knife, bloody clothes and footwear. OJ gave the knapsack that had the glove in it to AC to get rid of. AC brought the knapsack back. OJ then took the knapsack with him on the flight to Chicago. Then the glove that was in the knapsack that OJ gave to AC is found behind the house after OJ leave for Chicago. Fuhrman did not plant the glove. DNA results are 1 in billion people and there are 7 billion people on Earth. However, there is no other person on the face of the planet that could've planted the glove other than AC Cowlings. The glove was planted by AC between 11:10pm and 11:35pm and Fuhrman didn't even get the call regarding the murders until 1am. You're welcome! Reel Justice - King of the Case!

[@GA-fz2wt]

I watched this case live at the time and have many times since and I've always wondered why AC wasn't at his trial? Seeing as they were lifetime best friends & AC even drove him away from the house & onto the highway chase.Strange that he wasn't in court supporting his friend? Unless I'm mistaken but I didn't see him..

[@Reel-Justice]

@@GA-fz2wt AC never spent one second in court with OJ at trial. People will try and say that this was because AC might've been called as a witness. No. The DA did not use the low speed chase and AC wasn't on the witness list. Thanks for replying to my comment!

[@GA-fz2wt]

@@Reel-Justice Right,that's suspicious in itself,I would be asking where's my best friend while I'm on trial for my life!? But nobody has mentioned AC..Hmm 🤔 I know we all have different opinions on this case but I've often wondered if AC was with him that night. And one question,were there no street traffic cameras on the junction where Jill said she almost collided with the white bronco?

[@Reel-Justice]

@@GA-fz2wt Apparently there were no cameras at that intersection otherwise we would've heard about them by now. AC was not with OJ. AC's girlfriend said OJ called AC right after the murders and told AC to come to OJ's house immediately, which AC did. The person who was with OJ was Arnelle. Arnelle is Charlie. Kato testified that Arnelle was bad mouthing a now deceased Nicole Monday night. OJ said in his book IF I DID IT that someone arrived at his house and was bad mouthing Nicole so he and this person went to Nicole's condo. It was Arnelle. Arnelle arrived at OJ's right after Kato and OJ got back from McDonald's and Kato was now back in his room and on his phone at 9:37pm. Park saw Arnelle's car parked in Arnelle's daily parking spot behind the Bentley. Park did not know who owned the car as this was the first time Park picked up and drove OJ. However, Kato knows who's car it was but Kato has been too afraid for 30 years to say so. Kato walked directly past Arnelle's car 6 times between 10:54pm and 11:10pm. OJ was legit packing before Arnelle arrived at OJ's at 9:40pm. OJ had two pieces of luggage packed and Park saw them sitting outside of the front door when he arrived at 10:22pm. After Kato let the limo onto the property, OJ came out of the house 5 minutes later and OJ went to get the golf clubs out of the Bentley. This proves OJ was indeed packing before Arnelle arrived home and interrupted OJ's packing. The only question that really remains is this: Was it OJ who was wearing the gloves and cap, or was it Arnelle? The DA did not use DNA for the gloves at trial. Why not? In 2017, DA Darden was on Dr. Oz and admitted that the DA had DNA results for the gloves. Since the DA admits they had DNA results, and since they did not use them at trial, it tells me that the DNA was probably not OJ's. So it's quite possible that the DNA was Arnelle's because she was wearing the gloves and cap that Ron pulled off of her during the struggle before he died. The DA decided not to use the DNA for the gloves at trial because it would prove someone else was with OJ. There was also a blood type that didn't match OJ or any of the victims at the crime scene. This blood might also be Arnelle's.

[@GA-fz2wt]

@@Reel-Justice Interesting, I never thought of her,I didn't know any of this.. But if she was involved,would she not have had any cuts bruises etc when the detectives knocked on her door at the rear of the house looking for OJ? It all never added up to me and he took it to his grave..

[@baalbezub6848]

The bottom line is they couldn’t use JS as a witness because she actually blew a hole in the Prosecution’s timeline. How could OJ nearly run into her at 10:45ish, and at the same time bang against Kato’s wall?? They later tried to push the Kato noise time to 10:50 but by then the fork was already in.

[@SilmeonMusic]

Exactly this is what doesn’t make sense to me that goes over everyone’s head when it comes to this testimony. She said she had to have seen OJ around 10:52 in another interview. But Kato heard the noise around 10:40.. Alan Park saw OJ walk across the driveway around 10:55 I believe..

[@baalbezub6848]

@@SilmeonMusic That's the real reason they didn't call her as a witness.

[@SilmeonMusic]

@@baalbezub6848 yea makes total sense. But if she is telling the truth and based on Parks testimony when he saw OJ, what the heck the did Kato hear?!

[@baalbezub6848]

@@SilmeonMusic He heard OJ, and Parks saw OJ. They had the timeline wrong that's all. They later tried to change it and say Kato must've heard the noise at 10:50, but by then it was too late and the jury didn't buy it.

[@SilmeonMusic]

@@baalbezub6848 I have to go back and listen to Katos story.. do you know if he immediately went out to look after he heard the thumps or did he wait a bit?

[@baalbezub6848]

@23:45……quite a different reaction between Arnelle and Jason Simpson. 🤔🤔

[@KIP_KnowledgeIsPower]

The fact that she gave an interview is the “bad background”…. Part of a Jury’s rules when deciding the credibility of each witness is always “do they have anything to gain? Gave they gained anything”…. Interviews gain attention, often $$ too…. Not to mention it can taint a future Jury… There is NO logical reason to give anyone an interview before Trial, absolutely NO good can come of it. This was explained & ignored… Great to get this interview now though 😅😅

[@baalbezub6848]

This was a pattern with Prosecution witnesses, whereby the press found out about them almost instantly. It has been suggested that this was done purposely to actually help the Defense. Yes, you read that right. DA Garcetti NEVER had any intention of convicting OJ Simpson, and this was one of many tactics used to help the Defense. Normally the Prosecution would wait until the very last possible second to ID one of their witnesses to allow as little as possible time for the Defense to prepare for them.

[@loki2stunt]

The timeline never matched up... He couldn't be in multiple places at once.

[@June12Nine4]

Come on, mate. You must do better than that. Very very weak take. It's interesting how if the timeline is off just a bit, then your guy OJ is innocent. But when his blood, and the victims' blood are found at 3 prime locations within 2 miles of each other, that means nothing. Wow mate. Cheers.

[@gomez51791]

Bless her ❤heart

[@gailtaylor9154]

What they say : DARK don't have no EYES; Yes it dose!!!🌄

[@teamcougars]

Kati has always seemed like a good guy 😊❤

[@romeoshlomo179]

Nice story but question? Marcia Clark the state of California never used your quite interesting story. Why not. Also why did you sell your story for 💰 money but they never used you for the state case against OJ. 3rd the police came to your home why did they feel your story didn't just add up.? But of course here people going to run with your story. I go by the facts sorry but interesting story

[@reyrey343]

I have an original picture from the National Enquirer of Nicole on the ground with her throat slashed. She has her hand on the cement with her fingers forming the UNMISTAKEABLE shape of an "O." It would be almost impossible for natural rigor mortis to account for this difficult contortion. She actually told us who killed her and nobody caught it.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

Please take your meds.

[@princenamor1939]

Now that's rich!

[@nala3038]

@@SparkleInYourEyes2024I saw that too and I don’t need meds

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

@@nala3038 You do know that investigators believe that Nicole was killed elsewhere and her body was placed at the bottom of her steps because the soles of her feet were clean? So how could she have made an O with her fingers when she was already dead when she was placed at the bottom of the steps?

[@June12Nine4]

@SparkleInYourEyes2024 Wow mate. What investigators believe Nicole was killed elsewhere? Did you just hear about this case today? Her feet were clean because she was hit first before the blood. Know what it is you're talking about mate. It's embarrassing. Cheers.

[@TT41401]

I have always been fascinated with the details of the OJ involved murders. Not whether he did it or not, but the details of how he did it and the events of that evening. Somebody should take Jill Shively’s account details and map them with the details of a witness-Robert Heidstra to get an accurate picture of the route OJ took from Nichols’s house to his. If both accounts are correct, then the route home for OJ is difficult to understand. Obviously, he made it just in time, but to hear both accounts it actually puts OJ’s path home longer than people think. It would be best for somebody familiar with the streets in the area to comment, because I think there are only a few streets that intersect San Vincente that allow you to cross the east bound lane to go west (the direction of OJ’s house) because of the center median. At least it looks this way using Google Maps. One is Bundy and it looks as if So. Gretna Green also allows one to cross San Vincente to head west (left). That would seem the more direct route home for OJ, but when your take both accounts of Shively and Heidstra that route does not make sense. If OJ made a couple right turns to get to So. Gretna Green, then Shively would not have seen OJ crossing Bundy. For Shively to see OJ crossing Bunday, OJ would have to had made a series of lefts heading away from his house to re enter Bunday north of Nichols Condo. That seems timely. Robert Heidstra was walking his dog and when coming out of the alley on Dorethy east of Bundy he saw a white truck with no headlights on zooming east on Bundy and turning right (south) on Bundy instead of the direct path home which would have him turning left (north) on Bundy. His account also supports my theory and civil case prosecutor- Dan Petrocelli’s that OJ parked on Dorethy facing east in the little turn out space off the street across from the alley behind Nicole’s Condo not in the alley as people think. It was a dark unpaved little spot to park versus parking a big white vehicle in the alley which is not allowed, which would create awareness where somebody could see it and say, “I saw a white Bronco parked illegally in the alley that night”. If you’re going to go to the trouble of wearing black and a cap in June in LA and pull the dome light from your truck so that nobody can see you, you’re not going to park right behind the condo of someone you’re going to murder. If OJ parked in the alley facing north, OJ would have simply driven down the alley. If parked facing south OJ would have turned right on Dorothy leaving the alley which would be a direct way home, however Heidstra saw a white truck without lights on heading east on Dorothy towards him which only makes sense if OJ was parked facing east on Dorothy. If OJ turned right (south) on Dorethy as Heidstra indicated, it makes sense for two possible reasons. One is that OJ did not want to drive his highly visible white Bronco directly past Nichols’s house mere feet from where he killed her for fear somebody sees it and puts him at the scene of the crime. Secondly OJ may have seen Heidstra and turning right puts him away from Heidstra quicker than turning left plus again putting his Bronco right in front of Nichole’s condominium. If OJ turned left, he would then have to make a series of turns around the block(s) to then re enter Bundy north of Nichol’s house to then cross San Vincente as Jill Shively describes. Bundy allows traffic to cross the median to turn left (west) on San Vincente. Many streets allow traffic to only turn right, but few streets allow traffic to turn left and cross the median in that area. I am not sure why OJ did not make a series of right turns once leaving Heidstra and heading south on Bunday to go to So, in this scenario, OJ did not take the direct route home. It probably only cost him a few additional minutes, but I have always found the statements by Jill Shively and Heidstra to counter each other as far as where they saw OJ.

[@KingFitAngler]

note to self. Take the Money :)

[@GoldyRyun]

Every one knew who was guilty , but we also know that he got away with double murders , but he was found not guilty and even if he admitted to it after his trial , he couldn’t be charged again , it’s called double jeopardy, he’s gone now, so give it a rest , he’s not coming back and neither is the victims , so give it a break, these families need to heal as much as anyone can after such tragedy’s , so awful what happened to them, but nothing anyone can do about it. Just trust in God for strength and hopefully some comfort in knowing that their is a place called heaven ,

[@jlbaker2000]

And you could stand to learn decent grammar, punctuation, and spelling! And not everyone believes in God, the invisible man.

[@dealingthereal6922]

This woman is a hack. One of the best things that Marcia Clark did was not to call her as a witness.

[@June12Nine4]

Oh you OJ apologists never cease to impress us mate. So, Jill's story is rubbish to you, but OJ saying he's innocent as his blood trail ventures through 3 different locations...well...that's golden to you. Mate, you are quite the character with thoughts like that. Cheers. Wow.

[@dealingthereal6922]

@@June12Nine4 and you “OJ IS GUILTY” zealots take the cake. Jill is a hack. She actually called and “reported” this supposed incident on June 14th not on the night of (I.e., June 12th) as she proclaims in interviews like this. Why hasn’t the person that was in this gray Nissan never come forth. And as for the blood at the crime scene, we don’t know who’s blood was actually at the crime scene, as the blood that was collected at the crime scene is NOT the blood that was sent to Cellmark laboratories for testing and analysis.

[@dealingthereal6922]

@@June12Nine4 A - and you “OJ IS GUILTY” zealots take the cake. Jill is a hack. She actually called and “reported” this supposed incident on June 14th not on the night of (I.e., June 12th) as she proclaims in interviews like this. Why hasn’t the person that was in this gray Nissan never come forth.

[@dealingthereal6922]

@@June12Nine4 B - And as for the blood at the crime scene, we don’t know who’s blood was actually at the crime scene, as the blood that was collected at the crime scene is NOT the blood that was sent to Cellmark laboratories for testing and analysis. *End*

[@dealingthereal6922]

@@June12Nine4 A1 - and you “OJ IS GUILTY” zealots take the cake. Jill is a hack. She actually called and “reported” this supposed incident on June 14th not on the night of (I.e., June 12th)…

[@JLS70s-kid]

Aw we don’t realise the impact of this case on the witnesses. She must’ve gone through a lot.

[@drewlavay]

Hopefully you didn’t pay this woman. Her story was debunked years ago.

[@beyolightner]

What are you taking about? Lol she’s 100# credible she saw him leave the scene.

[@BigWilt2000]

@@beyolightnerexactly

[@johnmcclean343]

Not debunked. Her call to 911 reporting the run in with OJ in his Bronco was before anyone knew about murders .

[@nala3038]

You’re totally wrong

[@stevehill934]

whats the consensus here? how many of us believe her vs not believeing? whats everyones opinion on her testimony? im still not sure

[@cinsationalcinema1776]

I believe her. Why lie? Mainly when it comes to court situations, police, lawyers, press, public ... no thanks. Seems like a lot of shit to go through for a lie. However people lie all the time, so it’s not unheard of.. I believe her

[@artriveros7659]

There’s a couple of things a little off with her account. Westwood Ho was actually in Westwood , not BRENTWOOD. That one is not a big deal. She said she almost collided with Simpson on Bundy and San Vicente which means she must of been driving east on San Vicente(as she stated) to head towards Westwood Ho which was on Westwood Blvd. OJ would have had to leave that alley going north then make a right on Montana, then a left on Bundy to end up on Bundy & San Vicente. According to a witness who was walking his dogs, he noticed a car that looked like a Bronco come out of the alley going south, make a left on Dorthy, which was the street to the left of Nicole’s townhouse, then make a right on Bundy, which was away from San Vicente. Unless he made a U turn and headed back up Bundy , there’s no way he would end up on that interception of Bundy & San Vicente. Now, her story sounds very believable. There’s no reason why she would make it up. Just saying in contradicts the account of the witness who just a block away when he saw a Bronco type vehicle speeding away from that alley going away from San Vicente. That being said, her account would make more sense because OJ’s house was in that direction. As a matter fact in OJ’s interview after His , If I Did It book, he said thats the way he would have gone..Up the alley towards Montana.

[@donovans6472]

@@cinsationalcinema1776 why lie? did you really ask that question? people lie all the time. didn't susan smith lie about a black man carjacking her and stealing her two babies and weeks later they found the two babies drowned in a car. and she was the murderer.... go ahead and look up that story... so yes people do tell lies..

[@petersarich2418]

Don't know if I trust her word. Seems like she's lying. IMO

[@berylglynn2725]

Why would she what would she gain

[@BigWilt2000]

@@berylglynn2725right

[@nala3038]

What would be her motivation for lying??

[@garywhitlock6560]

The prosecution should have used her,but in the end it wouldn't have made any difference,that jury was never gonna convict him

[@petersarich2418]

I certainly don't trust her word

[@nikkix2896]

Her story has been consistent for 30yrs and there is a record of her calling the police that night on Simpson long before anyone knew he just committed a double homicide

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

​@@nikkix2896The only problem is she said she saw OJ at 10:50 but prosecutors contend OJ committed the murders way before 10:50. Also the LAPD said they don't have any phone records of her making any calls to them.

[@nala3038]

I believe her

[@ashleylin4980]

@@nikkix2896consistently BS

[@kristidraine4543]

So u just assumed that this man was drinking and driving reckless smh it's people like her that don't have facts or they information correct

[@June12Nine4]

Yeah mate, she just assumed that he was impaired considering how the guy was driving. It's offensive now to assume someone is drinking and driving if he's driving like a jerk? Wow mate, the world we live in now is in trouble. And what's with your horrible grammar mate? I assume maybe you weren't taught proper grammar. Cheers.

[@charleshart3010]

She filed incident report had license plate down which proves he was there at time after murdee mean he was lying being at home limo driver also said bronco wasn't there while he was waiting oj wasn't responding intercom call then limo driver saw someone in a hurry going into house then bronco was there then parked in hurry was shame she couldn't testify because prosecution didn't let her but jury was going to say not guilty anyway oj was guilty

[@OneWayJesus777-x2n]

things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmm :)

[@MrDuds1984]

Amazing if this happened today with street cameras this would have all been recorded and a criminal convection almost probable even with that jury. The detectives should have had the awareness to advise her at the outset please please don’t sell your story (yeah easy to Monday morning QB that one). With that said that was zero reason Marcia Clark should dismiss her, and why she’s a failed prosecutor you never ever have too much evidence.

[@berylglynn2725]

This is evidence that he was ther murderer

[@billyellis1552]

No, it just means he was there at that time

[@ezekielmajor5511]

Has the Nissan person ever come forward to back up her story?

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

Of course not because the Nissan person doesn't exist.

[@sdrh521]

If you read through the comments you’ll see that the person who was driving the Nissan commented on this video.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

​@@sdrh521And you believe that person? Oh dear don't tell me you're that naive. 😂

[@June12Nine4]

​@SparkleInYourEyes2024 Wow. Another OJ apologist who doesn't believe Jill but is all ears when Orenthal says he's innocent....with his blood at 3 prominent locations mate. You are extravagant. We all thank you, mate. Cheers.

[@SparkleInYourEyes2024]

@@June12Nine4 I'm not an apologist. I just posses critical thinking skills. The prosecution didn't put Jill on stand because she kept changing her story about when she called cops. She also said she saw OJ at 10:50 when Kato said he heard the thumps at 10:40. Her story doesn't add up with the prosecutions' timeline. How about you stop being a sheep and look at the case with an open mind.

[@telmoduro5774]

She’s a liar 😅 amazing con artist

[@June12Nine4]

Another OJ apologist who doesn't believe Jill but yet believes OJ SIMPSON is innocent as his actual blood appears in 3 different locations along with Ron and Nicole's. It is quite laughable mate. Cheers.

[@nala3038]

👎

[@Justnkase1-iz8pf]

She had her story in her mind, am I to believe she thought she saw OJ. Sometime's people try to fit something in a box that is not a fit no matter how many time's you try. I'm not saying I believe her or Not. Just saying. Why wasn't she called to testify for the Prosecution bc they needed all eye's from that Night, unless they felt setting OJ up would win their case and Eye Witnesses didn't Matter. Should have gotten a Pic and Plate Number if you had all this going on that night, she had time to get a good pic and plate number. But she didn't. Prosecution decided that wouldn't cut what they had planned for The Late Great OJ Simpson.😮🥱💤🕊️💐👎🏼👍🏼🏈🏆🎖️

[@dealingthereal6922]

Yeah, and what about the supposed person in the grey Nissan that OJ supposedly almost crashed into? How come this person never came forth to corroborate her story by saying that they were there, as well, and this event, did, indeed, happen? 🤔

[@DennieLew]

Marica Clark tells you in her book that she was never called to testify because you found proof that she is a known liar

[@marigold7250]

She may have had time to get a pic, but in 1994 people weren't likely to have a camera on them at all times.

[@johnmcclean343]

So she got the license plate of oj before anyone knew about the murders and proof of the 911 call recording has it time stamped.

[@johnmcclean343]

@@DennieLew Marcia is guilty for how bad she prosecuted the case. The DA brought in Marcia because of the strong DNA evidence, which was her strength. She wanted to prosecute solely on DNA here you have a witness that coincides with the timeline