Oh this looks good!! Definitely getting it. Great work Michael !!
@RobertBallMagician3 ай бұрын
Hi Michael. This is a great review. Honest and direct. 😊👍😊👍
@Grant-H2O3 ай бұрын
Now this is a truthful demonstration that i would trust 100% in buying. Great Work on this! Wow
@guest39973 ай бұрын
Hi Michael, great intro/review for Fahrenheit 451! You know me and you know I have all of Josh's books. This book is phenomenal! Your tutorials are always FANTASTIC! Thank you to both Josh and you for making these available. Josh's creations are incredible and your tutorials fantastic. Thank you both for all you do! Your friend, David
@time_machine70133 ай бұрын
😮 gotta get it. One of my favourite books
@rajansharma44889 күн бұрын
Would love to know more about reverse book test. Do we need to go through the book first or we can do it without going through the spectator book.
@OBrienMagic9 күн бұрын
The reverse book test is a method that allows a spectator to name any freely chosen page and you immediately know the last word on the page without having to ask any more questions. You do not need a second book.
@rajansharma44889 күн бұрын
@@OBrienMagic so it don’t have random book test built in?
@jefftravilla20 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for this review. I’m browsing Josh’s site and trying to decide which book to start with. If it’s possible to answer this without tipping the method, I’m trying to understand the difference between what he calls the LLW method in the Alice book test versus this holy grail method. Is it substantially different, and more importantly, is the spectator’s experience different?
@OBrienMagic19 күн бұрын
The principles between alice and 451 are similar but not the same. For example you watch their eyes in both methods but you are not watching for the same thing. The method in 451 is also much easier to spot than in alice IMO.
@OBrienMagic19 күн бұрын
Your question about “is it substantially different?” Yeah it isnt the same method. Its like asking if a pass and double undercut are substantially different as both are methods to control a card to the top. The experience for the spectator will be watever you make it. No two performers are the same. Even when doing flashback, I perform it for a few different people and do it differently each time. So even though I am using the same method, the experiences are different
@jefftravilla19 күн бұрын
@@OBrienMagic thanks so much for the clarification! What I meant in terms of the spectator’s experience was related to differences in the amount of procedure. It sounds like they’re similar in that experience. I guess I was just trying to suss out for myself whether Alice was a better starting point than 451 because of the price difference and extendability to the other books in the set. I’m really intrigued by all of them, but I think I’m probably going to start with the books in series 2 and put 451 on a wishlist for later. Thanks again!
@kinoxsteve71933 ай бұрын
Wow
@OBrienMagic3 ай бұрын
Its cool huh?
@jeangriffin80152 ай бұрын
Great review. Someone was asking me if we mainly want to perform Pegasus and we already have Time Machine, is this a different version of Pegasus? Is it worth buying this for Pegasus if you already have TM?
@OBrienMagic2 ай бұрын
The method is pretty much identical tbh. I would buy this for the holy grail method personally. I use TM for my pegasus page too! For me it is more about what story you want to tell. The PP for 451 is cool because the story is about destroying books so it works well!
@jeangriffin80152 ай бұрын
@@OBrienMagic ok thanks, is the word (having to do with Frankenstein, Godzilla, Cookie, etc.) the same? If it’s a different circled word then at least you could repeat for the same audience at a different show.