Officer Makes Up Laws To Enforce

[@AuditTheAudit]

We made it to 10k subs in just about a month! Thank you all so much for the support and I can't wait to see what the future holds!

[@arastanamedq2373]

You got yourself a sub. Very educational, unbiased and objective. 10k subs in a month? I wouldn't be surprised to see you exceed 100k by the end of the year.

[@supabiscuit]

Thanks for what you do. Truely

[@92656trw]

Audit The Audit you’re welcome!

[@frontallobotomy3481]

@Wayne Wyndham is there a particular place in sumpter?

[@logicalnotes5007]

Subs are the goal and Ads are the revenue. To hell with the 1st Amendment.

[@EchoJ]

Uhm, if our bases/installations have “military secrets” that can clearly be seen from a public sidewalk outside the checkpoint, then I think we have big problems.

[@spliffdelakong5422]

Isn't the military secrets. It's finding out weak points. Like a team casing a bank or a boxer watching videos of his opponent. Looking for weaknesses. Boxers doing it is fine, they're trying to find weakness in their opponent to win money. A guy filming gate guards finding weakness has the potential to cause way more harm. Maybe family guy is just filming, let's say how many marines drive mustangs. It's almost all BTW. Maybe he's tracking guard schedules. Growing up and still living/working on and around a base, I'm okay with this.

[@cesarfierro9983]

@@spliffdelakong5422 It's amazing these clowns can't figure out that casing security personnel activity at a controlled checkpoint could amount to probable cause for detainment. Some of these videos are really good, but the ones with these "auditor" ass hats just trying to get famous on KZbin are really idiotic.

[@ianbattles7290]

Right? If "military secrets" can be seen on Google Earth & Google Streetview, the military isn't doing its job.

[@cesarfierro9983]

@@ianbattles7290 There are other specifics that can't be seen from space Einstein, such as personnel movements and schedules. For real ya'll just need to stop, you're embarrassing yourselves.

[@MySqueezingArm]

It's understandable that the guards are nervous about a guy filming the outside. The encounter should basically have been 'hey what's up?' 'I'm allowed to be here XYZ' 'oh okay, we're gonna put up a privacy fence or something to get people like you to fuck off'

[@RossTheNinja]

Audit the audit remains informative and entertaining and therefore gets an A +.

[@EliteAirborn]

"You can't detain someone who hasn't committed a crime" "Can you be more specific?"

[@sahndays9640]

That shit pissed me off! Like bitch he just told you!

[@SmokeyEdits]

"So we can agree no crime is/was/is about to happen?" "Yeah" "So why did your guys illegally detain me without suspicion for over 35 minutes?" "What are you basing that off of?" I don't know, maybe the fact that he was told he was being detained, over 35 minutes passed, and you confirmed there was no suspicious activity? What the actual shitfuck did you do your whole life?

[@Corey1873]

@@SmokeyEdits I think the guy was saying that he's certain Now that there's no suspicion not that there was none when he was originally detained.

[@Whimpykids2]

Agreed that dude just got there he had little to no clue why he was detained to begin with and simply saying I was detained doesn’t infer that he knows why the fuck u were detained kinda gotta be more specific on what the fuck you did to get detained in the first place (like pointlessly videoing the front of a base for seemingly no reason other than to get attention like a 4th grader throwing a temper tantrum) some of the audits are cool but some are plain stupid and are simply in an attempt to get a settlement sure you have rights but wave something around enough and chances are they will take it away eventually it’s one thing to feel the need to state your rights it’s another thing to force the topic to come up (fuck with the system enough and the system will eventually adapt to either a side you like or to counter exactly what your doing) just food for thought

[@SmokeyEdits]

@@Whimpykids2 Hot take, but I don't really think it matters. Officers aren't teachers, they can't arbitrarily hold you "after class" because you annoyed them a little bit. I get what you're saying, but at the same time, that doesn't warrant a crime. Just because an audit may or may not be legitimate in nature doesn't mean they're breaking the law, which I feel might be a subject already being discussed within the auditing community as well as law enforcement.

[@gregcarlson8438]

I would imagine the police underestimated this guy because of the way he talks.

[@meepmeep3874]

I would imagine you did yourself! Seems to be a good few commenters have nothing else to mention than the way the guy speaks.

[@pascalsimioli6777]

@@meepmeep3874 Seems to me you're too busy being an hypocrite that you won't acknowledge facts about the reality you live in :) Keep patting yourself on the back, buddy

[@meepmeep3874]

@@pascalsimioli6777 huh? Did you reply to the wrong person?

[@gs325jcbd]

@@meepmeep3874 in other words, you are a bozo

[@meepmeep3874]

@@gs325jcbd lol because of how I talk? 😂

[@Shorty_Lickens]

I spent 9 years in the Navy and did 3 on security. If it were actually illegal to record a base or even the gate, he would not have been hassled all afternoon. He would have been snatched up immediately.

[@Shorty_Lickens]

@mynameis mynameis "They" never said that. You did, but the answer to that question is "fuck no!".

[@joshbull623]

Marine here, I see why the baggage on the Navy happens so much, different breed I guess. I had to spend 8 months as acting military police through the forward assistance program at Camp Lejeune and I can tell you that no, no one is getting snatched up. You could be detained and questioned as to why you are taking pictures but there is no CIA snatch and grab policy for photographers outside of a basic restricted base. I will say most military installations do own a decent portion of property outside the gate though which allows for investigations to occur there from military and makes it federal property not public. Also, yes it very much can be illegal, most bases are at least restricted, I direct you to 18, U.S.C. § 795 again like the video shows. This designation usually happens for normal bases during time of war, like when I served but can change, which happened towards the end of my service.

[@blusafe1]

@@joshbull623 That's not what OP is saying. You're actually agreeing with him.

[@rbeck3200tb40]

I used to go to airshows at all kinds of Navy, Air force, Air National Guard and Army bases all over the place and filmed and took pictures of all kinds of things Many other people did also . No one cared or bothered me and anyone else there filming and taking pictures. I dont understand what in the world is so horrible about filming an entrance to a military base ? Why is a video camera so terrifying ? I dont get it ?

[@jonathangalloway6796]

@@rbeck3200tb40 the difference with the entrance to a military camp is reconnaissance where to mortor a bomb where an advantage point is to shoot to kill... their are tons of reasons why.. Im very security aware after serving in Northern Ireland, operation banner. Maybe read up on that and you might ger my point. 👍🇬🇧

[@Officialkingz1]

With that voice He could easily play a character in family guy.

[@rickyhillis9021]

ᴏғғɪᴄɪᴀʟᴋɪɴɢᴢ I thought it was Gump, Forest Gump.

[@patthewoodboy]

he may have a disability , your comment comes across as nasty

[@mikeyseo]

@@patthewoodboy ... i donno. assuming he has a disability sounds a bit nastier....

IKR. That voice is unique.

[@patthewoodboy]

@@mikeyseo I wrote "may have a disability" , so its not an assumption :-)

[@cano2x]

Sometimes I think “if you just stop challenging these idiots…” But then I remember if someone doesn’t have the balls to challenge them, they’re control could turn bad in the future

[@ZendelWashington]

chess not checkers

[@Thumper770]

You can't give folks authority and then complain when they exercise that authority.

[@Thumper770]

@Karl Dubhe excercising authority is not abusing authority.

[@Alexa2z]

They are control could?

[@Thumper770]

@Karl Dubhe A cop can say whatever they want to say. Just like you. The absolute BEST thing...is to say nothing at all.

[@heidikickhouse-]

I don't know why this popped back up in my feed after years, but I am so happy to hear my favorite voice narrating again!

[@crisleroi299]

I wonder if Staff Sergeant Hook ever got promoted to Captain Hook.

[@mikedotson5548]

that is funny, but i actually knew a captain michael hook and a major pain

[@astrid654]

😂😂😂

[@astrid654]

mike dotson nice 👍🏽😂

[@darksharxz]

Damn😂

[@jokeduder]

Comment of the day

[@waytoomuchtimeonmyhands]

Agreed, if auditors are not willing to follow up with legal action then the encounter seems to be nothing more than indulging personal ego.

[@josephlewis7443]

I thought that these audits served the purpose of educating and correcting misconduct otherwise what is the point.

[@shedshow1439]

The educational value that I get from auditors does not rely on whether they follow up

[@waytoomuchtimeonmyhands]

@@shedshow1439 If the issue isn't arbitrated, what exactly have you learned? I get it that it can be strangely entertaining, but the objective is to show the limits of police authority. If the police get away with bad behavior then there are no limits to their authority.

[@shedshow1439]

Robert Schmidt I’m not gonna make you a report of what I learned , but if you didn’t learn anything from it then I guess you’re just already really smart so,, yea congrats

[@waytoomuchtimeonmyhands]

@@shedshow1439 Sorry, I didn't realize you were such a sensitive soul and incapable of dialog. Perhaps you should refrain from commenting if you can't withstand people questioning your comments.

[@damonfinken]

The most hilarious part... Auditor: "You can't detain someone for over 30 minutes who hasn't committed a crime ". Sergeant: "Can you be more specific "?

[@davothegreat9990]

Yet he intervenes and releases him.🤔

[@ZendelWashington]

infuriating behavior. B-

[@ben10094]

now you know why cops are HARMED in many STOPS in our AMERICA they don't know the DAMN LAW PERIOD & IT'S THE I'M THE BOSS & YOU ARE NOTHING HOW SAD FOR US AMERICANS CITIZENS TO HAVE TO PUT UP WITH THESE STUPID COPS

[@geoffrey4253]

@@ben10094 These Audits are excellent. If not for these Audits the United States will eventually slide into a police state.

[@harveyquinn3535]

Uhhh 1,800 seconds?

[@awrebyawe]

This was a great one. I, like other viewers assumed this was going to be a failure once the auditor started speaking, but man, he was very impressive! Stayed calm and knew what he was talking about, brilliant stuff from him

[@AndomedaShift]

Yeah no, not really. He came off as exactly what he was. An activist making a pointless point. One that he won’t follow up with or can’t even begin to understand the point of it.

[@bobreil7464]

I love how demanding cops are about showing them respect but when a civilian is talking to them they either jump on their radio or talk over them it's an obvious Fu to the person who is speaking why do cops expect more respect than they give to people

[@rc5924]

Because they're all fraternal, power tripping bullies

[@buck9668]

I've seen many vids where the civilian is aggressively disrespectful, talking all over the cop, and the cop is polite and listens respectfully.

[@victor-fowler]

The amount of respect one shows another is a direct measurement of the respect one has for themselves. If one has no respect for oneself they can't be expected to show any to other's.

[@hees0009]

@@buck9668 yeah, it definitely goes both ways. I think the only difference might be officers are supposed to be trained. Be nice if everybody just treated each other as they would wish to be treated...but not going to hold my breath.

[@AaronHendu]

It's a reason many people seek out a career as a police officer...they weren't able to get respect in their normal lives by just being decent, respectable people, so they choose law enforcement, where they can "demand" the respect their lives would so desperately lack otherwise.

[@alecedgeworth2814]

A military regulation is enforceable on a Civilian? Since when?

[@jasonbb7911]

Alec Edgeworth pp1

[@robertjugueta2700]

on military facilities and within property lines. outside of that, its still enforceable through other agencies (joint operations)

[@stolasJC]

Well Lincoln did suspend Habeas Corpus

[@jslack2310]

Under specific circumstances at least MPs are taught as well as no photos videos of any resources

[@TexasPapa13]

slacker2310 they’re taught wrong. Unless you’re on their property

[@maxbrown9918]

I like how the whole time he’s making sure the entrance is in frame at the end haha

[@dphotos007]

The detective knew he could not win the argument so he bolted.

[@420frankp]

Let's dive right in and audit the audit! Hell yea! Becoming one of my favorite KZbin channels. 😁

[@420frankp]

@@ebsenraptzski9522 why are you here, Negative Nancy?

[@420frankp]

@@marshmellowave What?

[@auditingcemeteriesandadven5969]

Frank do you watch after prison show. Let's dive Right in!!!

[@420frankp]

@@auditingcemeteriesandadven5969 what's the matter with you? You dont like the laws?

[@davidclark2932]

You need to get out more!

[@raybrensike42]

Did any of you get any congressional letter? I didn't get mine.

[@grahamhorwood7582]

Didn't get mine either

[@kaelshade4275]

@thunderbird002 I identify as a military base.

[@skhotzim_bacon]

@A V I don't get it ): why a free turkey?

[@TexasPapa13]

The Memo went out to all federal agencies

[@littledikkins2]

@thunderbird002 They can give you a ticket etc or hold you for civilian authorities but any offense on a Military Base is handed by the US Magistrate as they can't try non military personally.

[@ricksturdevant2901]

Audit the Audit is great !!! They are doing a great protection for citizens by education of all concerned

[@davidleer52]

Love how you guys go in to detail in these situations.. Audit the Audit gets an A++++. ✌️😎

[@merciless972]

S+

[@Regelos]

I also want to call you out (positively here) for being one of the only channels to actually link to the source of the content you are using. Its nice to be able to go to a channel if its interesting. You really have done a amazing job with your whole channel

[@Seiga005]

I love this guy's voice. Literally the most unintimidating voice I have EVER heard.

[@Bollibompa]

Imagine if he was the voice actor for Nathan Drake in Uncharted 4. He could become infamous if he dubbed famous characters in video games.

[@david-Davidson]

It's a common speech impediment

[@mikelitoris3438]

@@david-Davidson its funny as heck though hahahahahaha

[@jordank6961]

I had a female friend who had a speech impediment and for the first week i thought she was from Boston, we had a good laugh when she explained it.

[@garryh69]

Forest Gump

[@MrJreed1000]

All I can think the whole time watching this is... "Ur a goddamn genius Gump"....

[@christyallen8134]

GOTDAMN NOT GODDAMN. DO NOT USE HIS NAME N VAIN REPECT HIS NAME AND THRS ONLY ONE TRUE GOD AND HIS LAST NAME AINT DAMN.

[@JaxsynBunker]

Christy Allen nobody says got damn. It’s goddamn😂

[@Zeno4XX]

I'll say any goddamned thing I like, why are you even on this, of all channels, trying to tell people what they can't say?

[@mid2348]

Lmao! I’m dying over your comment!😂😂😂

[@camthorpe9388]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@the_best_of_times]

That officer talking in his mic is like someone at a function talking on their phone when it's turned off. It's a comfort thing.

[@BenHarrell69]

I just wanna see the face behind “the voice”

[@AdamChase87]

Its Doofy from scary movie

[@shandhi5391]

Nice try, FBI

[@HeavyDeathTrap2]

@@AdamChase87 me laugh so fucking hard, thank you Sir!

[@SchiwiM]

He sounds kinda crazy, yes, but you obviously need some kind of crazyness to test your constitutional given rights 😁

[@nicedreams7192]

100% a Melvin if I've ever heard one

[@namp4790]

You should sue them for violating their “ OATH”

[@craigjensen1091]

Sue! What's worst is violating a person's rights under " color of law", because its a felony and if its 4 or more people present or conspire with your rights, with is another charge. More prison time for law- breakers. Go to FBI and file charges against anyone and all. Make sure to video evidence.

They can't remember wtf the oath is... Haaaaaa

[@gc1042]

dont worry these snowflakes go around all day antagonizing authorities in hopes to be able to get footage to allow them to sue...

[@mikewalker6016]

@@gc1042 with great power comes great responsibility and absolute power corrupts absolutely. These cops should be charged with kidnapping. If you're not qualified or able to perform your job you should not be doing that job, especially given the potential for serious injury or death. Cops think they're better than citizens and if you think you're better then be better. The police force is just MacDonalds for adults, no real world skills required

[@noblecyborg-savage]

There*

[@johnrgulley5852]

All law enforcement should have a mandatory 2 year course on the Constitution before they can be working the streets.

[@Steve-O_FPV]

And should be mandatory short update course and re-tested every 3 years, pay for police personnel insurance for wrongful death claims similar to doctors, and have a national database open to the public to review and other police departments to use in deciding whether to hire them or not. They are able to do that for everybody else, why not police also, only makes sense.

[@johnf6687]

Johnr Gulley excellent hit the nail on the head

[@hammond1994]

And monthly refresher courses. I'm sure there are current event cases that can be used to determine the subject matter. The prosecutor's office should conduct the classes.

[@funkogalleries8342]

8 years to learn how to save lives A year to learn how to take them

[@martinm6368]

I'd much rather have them spent a decent chunk of that training time on practical psychology lessons so they learn how to deescalate and not break down during stressful situations.

[@MrTurnermason]

Can I say something, your in-depth background of the code, statutes etc. is very admirable.

[@cableboy123]

These people are tyrants. That detective released him once he saw he was detained but refused to admit they were at fault. Not surprised.

[@atrevino95]

@@ICBMCatcher I dont agree with that, yes there are auditors that fail, usually have some sort of legal issue depending on how badly they fail, but the better ones show how unknowledgeable or just wrong some officers are. Just as officers hold us accountable, we can hold them accountable.

[@Heemie]

@@Badartist888 Well, a guy like that can only sue if the officer(s) violate his constitutional or state rights and actually give him a cause to sue. If our law enforcement officers stay knowledgeable of the particular laws and regulations they're charged to enforce and operate within the scope of their authority these auditors would have nothing to publish and no grounds to sue. Just as some police officers say "innocent people don't run", innocent officers have nothing to fear from a recording device. Always do what's legal, always do what's right.

[@steevrawjers]

got cable clowns

[@steevrawjers]

ICBMCatcher loLLLLL

[@steevrawjers]

ICBMCatcher you get a C- lol

[@HiramTuaPR]

I follow him. Is one of my favorite auditors. Great audit of the audit

[@noblecyborg-savage]

Id rather listen to cats dying than this auditor speak

[@Pocol0c0s]

@@noblecyborg-savage wtf

[@noblecyborg-savage]

@@Pocol0c0s stfu

[@sandersoncampbell9402]

Noble Cyborg-Savage mate go spread negativity somewhere else

[@noblecyborg-savage]

@@sandersoncampbell9402 first time on the internet?

[@flinkostememniakgrant1266]

I'm 68 years old and I wish I had known my rights better when I was a young he*l raiser.that would of been a lot of fun but we Didn't have the devices for recording back then. The party's over for cops now.

[@rumporridge1]

Indeed it is. And rightfully so.

[@Noadvantage246]

Yeah tbh you would've been fucked back then knowing your rights or not. All a cop had to do was lie a say it didn't happen like you said then it's your word vs his. Hell even today, where we have videos of what happened, cops STILL lie about how things happen in their reports and sometimes get away with it. So you didn't stand a chance, knowing your rights even back then still helps tho I think most cops would be less likely to violate someone that knows they're rights and might file complaints or lawsuits against them.

[@krane15]

Not according to your president.

[@rc5924]

Yeah back in those days you had to use a tape recorder and a sketch pad

[@thatlsk]

It's not too late, get your old ass out there.

[@peekopakanko7053]

I’m going to learn how to talk like this auditor because it requires the listener to pay very close attention.

[@jimmyjustice1722]

I wish the cops that leave a thumbs down would realize there are more of us, citizens that demand they honor their oaths and protect our constitutional rights, than there are of them. Their arrogance, ignorance and egos are taking them down a very dangerous path. They need to change their behavior because we are watching and the citizens are catching on to their tyrannical behavior.

[@engineeringoyster6243]

Like many, I demand that cops submit to the authority of The Rule of Law.

[@daveblakeney4657]

Their "Percieved Authority" over anyone and everyone who is not part of the "Thin Blue Whine" is gonna lead "We The People" to draw the line in the sand..Mine has already been drawn,,I will die on my feet a free man,, before I live on my knees a slave...

[@engineeringoyster6243]

@Mr Free1 That is because the job is so terrible that only the idealistic or the desperate will even apply for the job. After a few years, the idealistic become cynical and leave for more attractive opportunities. That leaves the desperate losers behind. They would be failing at any pursuit in life. And, they keep screwing up with policing.

[@bessarion1771]

I figured each 40 or so thumbs down = one cop with 40 fake accounts.

[@javymcdeez3958]

I do not do audits I just try to go about my day until someone presumes I am up to something else. I have tried every available avenue to collect any info on this event I recorded as a man with all the available agencies involved and every single one will not supply any actual data to me using the excuse none available, good thing I got mine on the event. kzbin.info/www/bejne/amqvZptuiJ6rZ6M

[@gsolo9515]

I love it when they all start malfunctioning when you mess w their programming

[@donkarnage2568]

You can totally see the short circuiting in their faces, too.

[@eliasdavid5289]

lol

[@steevrawjers]

G Solo lol Clowns

[@pitchforkpeasant6219]

happens with people suffering from denial or cognitive dissonance too. people seem to either have no clue or literally cant handle the truth. reminds me of the matrix

[@MrLawalker]

YES!!!

[@petervenkman69]

There is truly a bizarre contradiction in the US law here. Police have to have a articulable reason to detain someone, but they don't have to say what it is, so how is someone supposed to know if their detention is legal or not? The logical answer would be to say "Why am I being detained" and if it can't be answered then "this is obviously an illegal detention, please let me go" , but as they don't have to answer... then it can only be debated after the fact, by which point I am sure the police can make something up retrospectively.

[@a.jperez202]

Its the responsibility of the courts to determine whether a stop or arrest was lawful, not the citizens.

[@petervenkman69]

@@a.jperez202 But that means the cops can make up a reason retroactively, which violate the spirit of the whole thing. I acknowledge there are times when it may not be possible to articulate the reason for a detention at the time (the person being detained is hostile) - however if a police has to be able to give an articulable reason to detain someone and they are asked specifically what that is, then the question is what reason is there for them not to answer? If they are not willing to answer then the question has to be "why won't you answer" and the obvious answer is that they don't have an articulable reason at this time, therefore under most circumstances logically the detainment is invalid if a police refuses to respond... except for some bizarre reason police are not required to answer a reasonable question.

[@a.jperez202]

@@petervenkman69 even if they were required to give an answer, it would still not empower a citizen to disobey if they disagreed. The courts have ruled that it is unlawful to resist an unlawful arrest, unless "life or limb" was in danger.

[@petervenkman69]

@@a.jperez202 Did I say it was ok to resist... but if they couldn't give a coherent answer you can say "this is an unlawful arrest and your camera will show that" - and the police could decide to stand down at that stage, or face legal consequences. It would prevent them from making things up after the fact, which I am certain happens.

[@Ryanbmc4]

Military member here: regs only apply to US military personnel. The rest of it is irrelevant. Public viewing is public viewing. SSgt whatever his name is isn't military personnel. That's a contractor. Probably prior service, but outside the gate MPs have limited authority especially in respect to civilians.

[@goodolearkygal5746]

I'm not military but I thought it would be obvious that military regulations.... are for, ya know, military. Stuff like this drives me nuts

[@engineer_07-present14]

Boy, this Staff Sargent is misguided. Makes it up as he goes.

[@MrBeevee5]

Made up or was he believing his own words?

[@sarahwatson7692]

Beve Smith There is a chance he believed what he is saying. He is probably repeating something he heard or was told and did no further research.

[@redgringrumboldt8983]

This is what leadership in the military does! 😂

[@lizweber14]

I happen to stumble across your channel n immediately began binge watching you. The way you're completely unbiased for one side and the other. You break down the videos with accurate information. Also have perfected explaining exactly if either side was right or wrong in a way everyone could understand, even if they no nothing about your rights or laws. Every Citizen and police officer need to watch these videos so they both can either protect themselves, or if they're a cop, respect and honor people rights and the law.

[@jcolt84]

Audit the audit is most definitely biased in favor of the law and of law enforcement. It is ignorant for people to assume that if a law exists, then it must not violate our Constitution. This couldn't be further from the truth! Although it may appear as though audit, the audit is intelligent enough to interpret the law, it couldn't be more obvious that they are ignorant of the Constitution. A constitution which is relatively easy to interpret. Unfortunately, a vast majority of Americans don't value their constitutional rights enough to read the Constitution.

[@derpataur1162]

That detective was holding back some anger at the end there.

[@fjccommish]

On that base, the staff sgt is a respected, big man. When he walks onto the street, he looks and sounds like a fool.

[@ianjohnson3770]

Staff Sgt really ain’t that high

[@johnghatti5435]

@@ianjohnson3770 it’s the middle ground. A good staff sgt. gets what needs to be done and gets the soldiers doing it. He’s the go between for soldiers and upper command really. Once you hit E7 there’s still certain things that need to be done but mostly paperwork and babysitting those Ssg’s and Sgt’s

[@ianjohnson3770]

@@johnghatti5435 I know, I'm in the military

[@whorton4]

He sounded like a typical drill sergeant from basic training. . . Too bad he was spouting BULL SHIT.

[@frankmartel5775]

Was the Fact that he was removed from where he was detained, handcuffed and sequestered into the cruiser make it de facto unlawful imprisonment?

[@jarradschiff4202]

It makes it de facto kidnapping.

[@Imawhiteboard]

I'd say so!!!

[@daveponder2754]

YEP!

[@JeanPaillard-to1hx]

@ Frank Martel 100%

[@aflaz171]

The boss cop is a wanker, jeez! This auditor is good. No swearing, calling people names etc. Very professional calm and collected. One of the very few I can be bothered to watch now!

[@aflaz171]

@@orange7536 It is my preference that profanity not be used at all. I feel that it puts you at their level. It is only my preference. It is an emotional immature approach that does not educate the public but push them away. The general herd are difficult enough to convince! I'm nearly 60 with a lot of living under my belt, I don't need to realize anything! You do! Plus moron I'm giving the auditor a compliment, not real bright are you!

[@onlythewise1]

@@orange7536 calling someone name is a form communicating the names is either right or wrong it maybe vague but its proper asses think there above name calling cause there smart asses

[@jalopenogardiner5323]

Excellent attention to detail. Though most was well over my head. It Absolutely matters !! BRAVO ✊

[@kalkanort9333]

The dude doing the video has a super unique voice.

[@handlmycck]

@Jack Ugaitafa sounds disabled

[@puppetsock]

It's "dry mouth." He's upset and under tight control, and concerned he might say something he would regret.

[@michaeldavis1978]

@@handlmycck lmao

[@richieinca]

Sounds to me like he’s on the spectrum.

[@alexanderthegreat5649]

@@handlmycck no he doesn't.

[@coquimonster31]

Between the two of you "audit the audit" and "accountability media" makes a damn good informative video. Keep up the awesome work.

[@offgridphilosophy7959]

Thank you for always being fair and unbiased!!! Excellent content!!!

[@martinaasandersen3775]

He should have showed them the google maps. Would have been hilarious. "So are you going to detain the Google Map driver?"

[@krane15]

You mean the robot?

[@dizzywun1950]

@@krane15 no he's right there are legitimate Google Maps drivers how do you think the GPS apps get accurate information someone gets in a car with a satellite dish and drives around the state

[@maxk5065]

"oh i didn't know about that, who did you say is this google matt, do you have his real name? he's in real trouble"

[@seattleblaze]

These are by far, the most informative videos, about the public's rights. I will be conducting my first audit soon.

[@mtpocketswoodenickle2637]

seattleblaze. Before your endeavors begin, may I suggest a couple videos for your protection and entertainment. Go to Robbbryder channel on KZbin. Watch his video titled "Certify THEIR election" Then watch his video titled, "With liberty and justice for all"

[@HelloKittyFanMan.]

@@mtpocketswoodenickle2637: I also suggest to her or him a video about where and where NOT to use commas (such as the ones right after "far" and "videos" right here). :-P

[@seattleblaze]

@@HelloKittyFanMan. I truly appreciate the correction,

[@HelloKittyFanMan.]

Hehe, @@seattleblaze, thanks. Do you know how to use the edit feature here (which would take less clicks of effort to just do than to say "It's too much work" would)? If not, I'll walk you through it.

seattleblaze Don’t take any shit from these Ass hats

[@bigcshagogo]

Need a lot more of these videos. Very informational!

[@salvagemonster3612]

Hey that was my former Captain at Camp Lemonnier in Africa. Captain Finn. Super nice guy and a CB.

[@Mannydude96]

Doesn't seem too nice in this video

[@frankmoore3598]

Hook was using the classic act of " if you can't wow the with wisdom, baffle them with BS.

[@cointelpromusic6375]

2:02 ... "is that the law or just something you're saying?" hilarious

[@BORDERMAN2000]

I hope you do border patrol check points soon. Keep up the good work .

[@AuditTheAudit]

It is on the agenda for sure!

[@damienhollester1006]

BORDERMAN2000: The SCOTUS has already ruled that the checkpoints are legal. Failure to satisfy requirements can lead to detention and arrest.

[@damienhollester1006]

libra8a: Not only has the SCOTUS ruled that at inland check points that they can detain you pending satisfaction that you're a citizen, but they can jail you and they have installed two room mini jails at inland check points. As a note, it is not a crime for a U.S. citizen to cross into the country at any point along the border however by doing so you might be stopped and asked to prove a right to be in the country. Thanks for your comment.

[@damienhollester1006]

libra8a: The United States v. Martinez-Fuerte : 428 U.S. 543 (1976)

[@damienhollester1006]

libra8a: I agree with you on the issue of answering questions however by not doing so you are detained until the BP officer is reasonably certain that you're a citizen or otherwise entitled to be in the U.S. Sometimes that could be by required fingerprinting.

[@garrettr3644]

Haha I love this auditor. He’s so articulate and knows his stuff.

[@Leroyy536]

A circus of fools, that’s all I seen.

[@scottalderson8673]

Keep it up... you've been on our radar for awhile now.

[@grahamhorwood7582]

Exactly

[@steevrawjers]

Blondie lol iT's A cLoWn HoUsE !!!

[@Dowlphin]

15:38 I would say, especially considering the material usually shown on this channel, listening to Detective Mitchell's style of communication was a delight. Very polite, civilized and inquisitive and even hardly challenging in an offensive way, and yet maintaining a core of authority he would not compromise. Understandably the auditor's recommendation for internal revision of the department were a bit provocative to that core, but we can easily tolerate that, since he also has a representative role and has to weigh factors. He might have taken his time alone later to study the incident properly. Without having done that we cannot expect him to figuratively bow down before the auditor, who, from a psychological perspective, also did not have an aura of particularly high respectability, although that is no distinct fault of his but just the way he verbally expresses himself.

[@Samuraid77]

Long story short cops need to get over how people talk and just learn the law. Doesnt matter if he expressss himself the way he does, the law is the law and even the "nice" cop failed to know some of it and was actually quite condensending in his attempt to convince the auditor that no crime of ilegall detainment had been committed when it had. He would not have instantly released him if they had articulateable suspicion and they never got his name so they didn't push the issue because they realized they were wrong. The officer knew they committed ilegall detainment, but still tried to convince the auditor they had not to dissuade him from filling a lawsuit. It's a fake kind of niceness, some of them have to have it.

[@Madara2B]

he dont get a pass from me i can hear the cunty ness in the voice its undeniably a ravishments of what he is saying to the officers.

[@xanadujohn79]

Military Police jurisdiction ends once they leave the Military base period.

[@jjbrahams]

Not even remotely true. I was an MP. There are different kinds of jurisdiction. Actually a lot of bases have MPs doing police work on the highways around base.

[@stitch684]

Jafe Stelton LOL, you cant tell these folks that. They just go by what they hear.

[@tcs07d]

@christopher martin I know Fort Benning they patrol the Highways around the base. I didn't watch the whole video so I know I missed alot but civilians have to careful because as highlighted with article 795 there are plenty of things that seem silly that is classified. There many fuzzy statutes especially dealing with homeland security that makes filming military installations illegal in some sense.

[@GeekOfAllness]

Note that the edge of the base is not the fence and/or gate. Base property often extends past that line substantially. It's quite likely that sidewalk was part of the base property.

[@redgringrumboldt8983]

@@GeekOfAllness Most bases I've been to literally mark the ground where government property begins and ends.

[@stonesatglasshouses3477]

My husband and I were parked in a parking lot about a 1/4 mile from a base entrance. We were lost and were trying to figure out where we were. At no time did we enter a base. Out of nowhere, when we began to drive, we were surrounded by police and military police and were told we were on base. They all freaked out, threatened to arrest us, charge us with crimes on base. It was nuts. Once I realized what was going on and calmed down, I realized I had done nothing wrong or illegal and broken no laws. I told them this and they let us go. It was nuts.

[@Chrisfragger1]

Me: "Officer, what am I being arrested for?" Officer: "I don't have to tell you that, get in the car." Me: "Ok..."

[@jismeraiverhoeven]

"Stranger danger, stranger danger!"

[@Jazzeki]

i mean it's abseloutly the correct response. it's going to be hillarious to see them try to desperately nail you for ressiting arrest when you've done nothing else wrong when you literaly just comply and let them arrest you. too bad having arrested a person for no reason is still not going to cost them anything.

[@keywestconchchroniclescons4585]

When is somebody going to just start class action lawsuits against these departments for their obvious illegal activities

[@jordanrejon5091]

Perhaps we should be asking why we haven't heard of anyone starting a lawsuit against them it's purely speculation but I believe it's because of the military, the government, and the media suppressing the reports or even the suites themselves

[@sijonda]

I think it's because it will cost a substantial amount of money. I certainly don't have enough to take anything to court and pay for a lawyer.

[@ThirteenAmp]

@Omega Minus the Catholic church has not been taken down what so ever, its base isnt even in the US and counts as their own state/country (The Vatican) Italy cant even really mess with them. A few priests have been arrested but nothing has even come close to shutting the churches down.

[@MWAclanGaming]

@Omega Minus for fr the police union loves money and is all about money, so if you start messing with there money then maybe they will start thinking more about there actions.

[@1234qwer1002]

Won't matter they are in the club

[@curbotize]

New sub here. Been binge watching your videos backwards since i found this channel. I must say, this is one hell of an informative channel and pretty layman. You're doing a great job here my man. I like this stuff, i also like seeing cops who think they are above the law they are upholding getting owned. Keep it up bud.

[@robbleeker4777]

In my mind, it is common sense that military installations are operating under different rules than civilian ones and it is a lot more sensitive what you are doing around a military area..

[@46L482]

File a complaint and file a law suit.

[@scottalderson8673]

No base for law suit loser

[@jasonflinders-1984]

@@scottalderson8673 why not? You're saying that I could just come up to you and order you around under threat of jail or even death, lock you in a car for however long I wanted, then just say "oh, my bad hehehe" even though you had broke NO laws? Is that what you're saying here scotty? Loser.

[@scottalderson8673]

@@jasonflinders-1984 you're on our radar

[@jasonflinders-1984]

@@scottalderson8673 hahahahhhahahhHAAAAAA!!!!! and where exactly does your "radar"place me at right now, scotty?

[@scottalderson8673]

@@jasonflinders-1984 you've actually been on our radar for quite a while

[@jwill9746]

A citizen who knows there rights will always be more dangerous to a cop then the gun they have in their holster

[@ebonimom6964]

Also, a person should know the correct use of there, their, and they're along with knowing their rights. Then, that citizen would be a force to be reckoned with!

[@ebonimom6964]

@Akbar Shabazz-Jenkins gotta admit, you got me their.....I mean there 👀😊

[@stevenwbar6554]

@@ebonimom6964 😆I'm dying!!!! Lmao

[@TexasPapa13]

Akbar Shabazz-Jenkins wrong. We all have the same rights. Always film your interactions with police. For the lawsuit

[@TexasPapa13]

Akbar Shabazz-Jenkins they don’t like it when someone of any color knows more than them. They thrive on ego. And all you’re doing is bringing up race when it absolutely doesn’t matter here. Don’t be that guy.

[@meggsgg]

dude this guy is hilarious! "thats the start and end of that story" bruh im dead! LMFAO

[@vegaspony]

that's all i have to say about that

[@ImmortalDee]

@@vegaspony 😂😂😂😂😭😭😭💀💀dead

[@zwem6]

That sounds like my book reports from high school. Clearly I gave 0 fucks.

[@WILDGUN96]

One thing overlooked is alot of time the bases own that land around the base fence too. There are usually signs that say no photographs or videos and all personal are subject to search. So if that sign is there and he walked past it he just agreed to it and has no leg to stand on. While I was at Fort Bragg this was the case and we had a couple people try and looses. Once you walk past that sign all your audit falls apart.

[@Br0nto5aurus]

Well he was on the sidewalk so, unless the military is asserting that they own the sidewalk on a public street, which would be fallacious, he's still in the clear. If there was a sign that said "no photos", it would probably be visible from his footage, and the pigs definitely would've pointed it out instantly.

[@wheatdevon]

> “When the "law" no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know your nation is doomed.” - Ayn Rand

[@alleyoop4465]

Who is John Gault?

[@ketchuploverful]

@@alleyoop4465 Willie Gault's evil twin

[@alleyoop4465]

@@ketchuploverful read more, football less.

[@scottalderson8673]

Good

[@wheatdevon]

@@alleyoop4465 I believe it was a quote she made at a forum about communism. remember always she grew up and lived thru communism. she like others uses stories like Atlas shrugged to convey the evil that is that ideology. the new evil you must fear is "climate change" which is merely communism with the foundation it lacked...:a religion.

[@raybrensike42]

How about getting an artist to set up an easel to paint the entrance to this place?

[@sirslickrock]

Ray Brensike sketches and or drawings are listed as well

[@DadBodDrumming]

@@sirslickrock but not Paintings!

[@ScallopHolden]

What about poetic description?

[@SergeantExtreme]

@@sirslickrock Except 18 code 795 does NOT apply to this situation. The video literally covered that. Did you not watch ANY of this video at all, and instead just scroll down to mouth off in the comments section like a troll?

[@sirslickrock]

Captain Obvious no, not in this situation but I was answering the bit about sketches and drawings.... since you wanna be a dick about it; context works wonders

[@topdhen]

If you imagine he’s eating a sandwich while conducting his audit, it becomes so much more funnier

[@figjam9530]

i like to picture a ruben. for some reason that sandwich makes it funnier to me.

[@VincereVelMori1987]

@@figjam9530 why the fuck is this so funnny!?!?!?!? 🤣🤣🤣

[@ThatGuy-gn6co]

I read he’s a sandwich, and honestly it still made sense

[@merciless972]

Lmao

[@jaycarrillojc]

I'll hand it to the auditor. There were a lot of officers there, both police and military, bearing down on him and he stood his ground and slapped some sense into them. He got illegally detained for a half hour and was clearly livid but had the restraint to compose himself.

[@TheMick26]

@Audit The Audit - Thanks again for sharing these videos. They're to the point, very well-presented, and highly informative.👍 I'm no authority on the matter, but if I were to audit 'Audit The Audit', I would give an A+ for the reasons listed above.😁 Enjoy the rest of your weekend, sir.

[@ipsurvivor]

This is one of the more constructive audits... It brings out salient issues... It makes me nervous when Military come out and involve themselves with civilians... Slippery slope... *Edit-My views have changed since I posted this ten months ago.

[@OldManWhit]

yeah, I'm all for auditing the police, but when it comes to military installations I'm not sure there is a win for "auditors."

[@DonB.-Mulefivefive]

@@OldManWhit Nope, chances are pretty good they'll insert that " National Security " clause and then it's just about all over. People go missing around Area 51 for that same shit. Try recording outside of and well off the base of things like, an active navy base or an Air Force base known to have nukes ( Fairchild AFB Washington comes to mind). Try to record as your standing on a public passage outside of any of those and you will, be greeted by people you do not, want to meet.

[@psychologicalsigma9917]

@Timothy hENNIGAN right. Auditing police is good for our rights. Sniffing around the military seems a fast track to next level surveillance 😂😂

[@bobroberts5423]

I feel sorry for you because of the way you sound but stop messing with people and they won't mess with you.... You are trying to tell me my rights I know my rights.... I'm telling you common courtesy out ways all rights.... So stop f****** with people !!!

[@ipsurvivor]

bob roberts - My views have changed dramatically in the 10 months since I posted this. Also information. Sometimes the lines demarcating military and civilian boundaries are not as clear as most “auditors” think that they are. Sometimes the bus stop or the “easement” or even what looks like a civilian municipal street (or even a State highway) is under military control... When people learn from other KZbin videos by other misinformed “auditors” then they often get the results of acting stubbornly on bad information. Furthermore, The GIS surveys they sometimes rely on are often off by several feet or more. The surveys conducted by on the ground professionals are much more accurate. There is a Supreme Court case about misunderstanding military boundaries. In UNITED STATES v. APEL(2014) No. 12-1038 Argued: December 4, 2013Decided: February 26, 2014 {Held: A "military. . . installation" for purposes of §1382 encompasses the commanding officer's area of responsibility, and it includes Vandenberg's highways and protest area. Pp. 6-14.} { (a) Contrary to Apel's argument, §1382 does not require exclusive possession and control. The statute is written broadly to apply to many different kinds of military places, and nothing in its text defines those places in terms of the access granted to the public or the nature of the Government's possessory interest.} I’ve become more anti-auditor since I last posted on this page. I already couldn’t stand the so called postal audits... I’m going to watch this again and give it a fresh review.

[@zerozzlikaboss7738]

9:47 here we have a rare introvert chat, watch as both of them struggle to answer each other’s questions

[@UrMomGoes2College]

I was thinking the same thing!! Two socially awkward people meet...the stars must have aligned!!

[@ZendelWashington]

“ah, an informed citizen! let’s see if I can confuse you by saying something arbitrary. that one didn’t work, huh? is this your card?! is this your card?!”

[@turkeycannon161]

Watching this with headphones is so weird, the auditors voice echos back and forth between your ears without ever seeming to be in any one area, and it's ONLY HIM.

[@aminostyles6801]

Lmao this guys voice is freaky haha

[@Emanuel1998dd]

I wanna hear that guy say "i love u jenny"

[@MrBackslider1]

I want to hear him say aloud "I'm here to do whatever you want me to do drill sergeant"!! Lol.

[@kamilthegreat2834]

Dude thats epic

[@Thishandlemakesnosense]

I did not hit her!!

[@Andrewbreeze316]

Sounds smarter than 90% of police officers I’ve encountered tbh

[@harlotteoscara686]

😂

[@roblikes8435]

Lt. Dan - “Have you found Jesus yet, Gump?” Forrest - “I didn’t know I was supposed to be looking for him, sir!”

[@zootjitsu6767]

Lmao when the detective talks about freedom of information act and the dudes like “I’ve done them before” of course he has 😂

[@joselucca2728]

"Congressional Letter" LMAO!!!

[@aldonova9974]

Ask him to spell it

[@tonycelestro1959]

@CR MacDonald but, a twinkie has value!

[@shawnoreilly4917]

Regulations and/or polices used ON the base have NO bearing while on public property

[@sirslickrock]

Shawn Oreilly it’s a UNITED STATES CODE

[@carloshidalgo4982]

“Pay the man heeess moneyyyyy”

[@bonusround5583]

KGB enjoying his Oreos while auditing the police...

[@K9Art]

Seeing police officers get owned really makes my day.

[@Yung_ammo]

Damn dude... the impressions of that guy by all the cops when they were done with that must’ve been GOLD.

[@jasonforgeron]

Brooooooooo😂😂

[@lukewalker2936]

Right or wrong that guy got absolutely roasted as soon as they left

[@jacobwatson5739]

He's most likely on the spectrum so if you find making fun of autistic people hilarious, you definitely have some growing up to do.

[@ianjohnson3770]

@@jacobwatson5739 making fun of a person who is autistic is just like making fun of anyone else. Making fun of a person because of their autism is a dick move, however

[@jacobwatson5739]

@@ianjohnson3770making fun of how he was speaking is making fun of someone because of their autism. That's a sign of being on the spectrum. Maybe just dont make fun of people for things they can't change.

[@bradleybanzo2623]

Idk why but this guy got me watching these vids more than my history vids for class😂

[@LeCheeZy]

wow i like this auditor a lot ! eloquent and composed

[@Liberty4Ever]

Love the auditors who protect our rights. I'd have printouts of the DHS memo explaining that video from public areas is legal, 42 USC 1985 that explains deprivation of rights under color of law, the GIS survey that shows that the sidewalk is public property, etc. Then again, if the goal is to make permanent changes in the enforcement rather than survive an encounter, it may be better to know these things cold but not reveal the information until the lawsuit is filed.

[@bobbays1552]

I thought once a citizen evokes his 5th amendment right the law enforcement agent has a duty to articulate what you are being arrested or detained for.

[@x8jason8x]

Pretty sure they only have to tell you what you're being arrested for, and even that may be dictated by local policy. Not 100% sure but it's certain you don't know what you'll be charged with if arrested until arraignment, as prosecutors decide the charges that go to court.

[@alexfrederick9019]

You'll get notified in charging documents, other than that they don't have to tell you shit, though they usually do notify a person being detained, they have to prove reasonable suspicion and probable cause to the court, not to a defendant.

[@stovillaelohimra4099]

@@alexfrederick9019 You're not very bright lol

[@rancorusia]

@@alexfrederick9019 you're just blatantly wrong

[@at1enforcer340]

You should email AM a link of to this video. It may encourage him to go forward with legal action.

[@jeebs9]

I'm sure they are waaay ahead of him.

[@susansaunders249]

I think his voice is great. It sounds more to me like maybe someone with hearing issues/cochlear implant rather than a Gump-like issue

[@thedraugr5069]

This 100%. People saying forrest gump obviously haven't spoken to or heard a deaf person.

[@simonclarke8098]

He's shook up beyond belief. Heartbreaking

[@paulsuprono7225]

HIS DEPARTMENT DID NOT KNOW THEIR JOB !

[@michealshelton2133]

Great interaction. Awesome job by the auditor keeping his cool.

[@rockapartyjd]

I've been bingeing your channel all day. Fantastic channel for the community. Tho, I dont agree with all your grades your research and knowledge is outstanding!

[@Obscured1972]

The supervisor made it clear he has no problem with his officers violating citizens rights. My guess is he actually encourages it

[@gbear1005]

9:57 ..you arrested me and unarrested me and want my name? It's PLANTIFF....two F's

[@rc5924]

Lol nice

[@HuntsT]

Plaintiff*

[@PaulinaPaulino]

What authority, if any, do MP's have off their base when dealing with law abiding citizens?

[@daveblakeney4657]

Absolutely none when said citizen is on public property..ZILCH

[@DaxMapsOfficial]

Absolutely zero.

[@douglashoward4206]

all on the base none off the base.

[@willdockery1829]

None whatsoever!! So sad this group of so called police officers and MP’s don’t have a clue about the constitution of the United States and that they have zero authority over a law abiding citizen practicing a 1st amendment protected activity. No policies of any government agency should ever override the rights of citizens guaranteed to us by the U.S. constitution!!

[@gregorymarshall2633]

Will Dockery All MPs are supposed or allowed to do is observe and report to local police and only intervene if someone’s life is in danger

[@samuelkoonce8488]

He was in all rights of his and our rights to publicly record his actions ! ❤😊

[@engineeringoyster6243]

Excellent point on the lack of a requirement for police to inform persons why they are being detained or arrested. Suspects generally will only find out the reason at arraignment, typically within 48 hours. Further, since police are allowed to not be truthful in this setting, they could very well have RAS, but say they don't. That puts the suspect in jeopardy if they fail to identify upon request. However, I suspect that a charge for failure to identify in such a case would be difficult for a prosecutor to win because it would appear to be a type of entrapment. From this video, it appears that the photographer did not identify upon request and it appears that the officers did not arrest him for that failure. Finally, in the remote eventuality that the photographer pursues a civil right lawsuit for the illegal detainment, a key, compelling piece of evidence would be testimony from the detaining officers about what their RAS was. Unfortunately, they won't be required to testify under oath until months later. In the meantime, most certainly the officers will have been exhaustively coached on how to testify. This coaching will come from fellow officers, union leaders, attorneys hired for him by the union. Plus, he will have received advice, but not coaching, from the attorneys defending the lawsuit. But, most alarming, the officers are allowed to be incorrect about the legality of the activity they observed. e.g., they could say that they sincerely thought that photography of the gate was illegal when it actually is legal. All this shows that almost aspect of the relationship between police and the public is asymmetric.

[@craigjensen1091]

Still , file felony charges, with the FBI, violating rights is serious business, prison time is mentioned under " color of law", statutes and codes are not law!

[@engineeringoyster6243]

@@craigjensen1091 Generally, only prosecutors have the authority to file criminal charges. With few exceptions, there is almost no way for the public to force a prosecutor to pursue a case that they don't want to. Although, I understand that one of the few exceptions are violations of civil rights.

[@elibingbing]

Nice work.