Officer Trespasses and Is Caught by Civilian

[@AuditTheAudit]

The first 1000 people to use the link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/audittheaudit03211

[@punchy77855]

Just claimed it 👍

[@debatable1984]

Uploaded 8mins ago Comment posted 7 hours ago Math is weird.

[@corssecurity]

Fyi fair use is a defence against copyright but only after you are sued.

[@anguished-night8734]

7 hours but this video started 12 mins ago

[@Bozemanjustin]

I love how the cop felony trespasses with a firearm.. by entering property of which he had no warrant. Then when the guy says I don't answer questions the cop acts like he's been insulted. I'm not a lawyer, but I was told by a police officer, if a cop comes on your property without a warrant he can be shot like any other trespasser. As trespassing with a firearm is a felony. I've heard some states are ridiculous, even requiring the family to retreat from their own home during a robbery rather than shoot the guy.. but this is Florida. I wouldn't be surprised if it's still on the books ,that it's legal to feed trespassers to alligators.

[@miked5814]

This is why cameras are important. I had 2 officers show up to my house and knock. I opened the door and asked them what they wanted. They said they were investigating a noise complaint. I said well it's not me as you can see. They asked if they could search the house and I asked if they had a warrant. He said no we are just asking and I said that when they got a warrant I'd let them in, until then I didn't want them in my house. They jerked me out of the house and put me in cuffs, told me I was under arrest for disturbing the peace and said they would let me go if I let them search the house. I said no, they ended up going in anyway and said I had given them consent. There was no mention of anything else in the report and of course because cops don't lie. The judge didn't believe me. So this long story is to remind people to always film every interaction you have with police.

[@usaturnuranus]

Man, that's the shite that boils my blood! Hope it all went your way at some point. F*#$ING AHOLES!

[@miked5814]

@@usaturnuranus nope. Those officers are still working in that city. I moved the f**k out after a couple of more things happened. Man, always have a camera ready because they will f**k you over and they lie all the time.

[@sickjohnson]

I want to say unbelievable, but there are so many videos showing this exact some thing! Even if you had a video of it, the worst they would get is transferred... FUBAR

[@JorVor13]

Where I live, the academy has a series of tests that would-be officers have to pass involving volunteer actors and props. One scenario has the officers respond to a noise complaint at an apartment, and it turns out there's an adult serving minors alcohol. The first step is to knock, and encounter the adult who refuses the police entry. When/if the adult opens the door to speak to them, the officers can see the minors with the alcohol. At that point, a handful of officers will say, "I don't need a warrant, you're under arrest," and they'll search the apartment and arrest the minors. Those officers failed that scenario. I wish every academy had tests like that.

[@Kris_P._Bey_Ken]

Man that sucks when lame ass judges side with law enforcement. I guess that's what qualified immunity is.

[@Caroline-se1zc]

What gets me is that the officer tells Mr. Norris that the vehicle isn't Eli's, but then when talking to the second person he states that Eli's vehicle was abandoned. It's nutty that cops can lie freely but lying to a cop is "obstruction".

[@OriginalDimascus]

It's called "entrapment tactics"

[@tabryis]

1312

[@JustInCaseUDidntKnow]

You hit the nail true. Right down the middle. Great job! Rights over wrong

[@adelkayani2595]

Fuck this cop but he didnt actually say that. He said there is mail in the car that goes back to Eli as in prolly letters adressed to Eli

[@OriginalDimascus]

@@tabryis what is 1312 a reference to? I'm sorry I don't get it.

[@brettywap2295]

"Call and file a report.." Then proceeds to not identify when asked. And that's why people don't like cops.

[@maximusgladi8or]

well it does not help that the property owner is being uncooperative and passive aggressive for who knows what reason. the cop is not allowed to collect evidence. but is allowed to ask you questions, knock on your door and ask about something. the cop here is not being unreasonable. lets say the cop does leave and comes back with a warrant and the car is moved. now this homeowner would be considered a suspect of a possible crime..... then just cause more headache for himself, rather than just answering the questions honestly if of course the homeowner is NOT doing something illegal. but this makes it look a lot like he is actively trying to hide something.

[@brettywap2295]

@@maximusgladi8or too many what ifs. Guy was within his rights and told the cop to leave his property. Done. Also, failure to identify when asked is a crime for police in most places.

[@maximusgladi8or]

@@brettywap2295 the only what if is the cop now going to go get a warrant. even if the warrant is justified or not.... i don't know why people have such a big issue with just answering some questions like you are being interviewed for a multinational news network or something. if a cop came to me when i was lingering around a parking lot and he asked why i was there. and i say "im cheating on my wife, waiting for my booty call right now" the cop would not arrest me for that he would probably judge me, but he would then just be like. "alright have a nice day" now if i was waiting for a drug drop, and i say im not doing anything and i refuse to answer his questions then all that is going to do is make him either come back or worse.

[@maximusgladi8or]

it is hilarious to me the amount of headache you bring upon yourself. weather you are right or wrong does not make a difference. and if the cop is wrong then do what you want. and at that point do are the one having an ego trip more so than the cop is. im not out here to compare dick sizes. im just trying to get by without being shot or thrown in jail for no reason.

[@brettywap2295]

@@maximusgladi8or but they weren't in a parking lot, they were on private property. And your other "what if" was the homeowner commiting a crime. Some people don't like the cops and don't want to help them, and rightfully so.

[@BirdDawg1]

This is VERY important. I had an issue with Sheriff's deputies trespassing over a locked gate, no trespassing sign clearly in sight, when I found them they had their guns drawn on my dog. This was 200 yards inside my fences. They had the wrong place, and I saved my dog ONLY because I was home and heard him barking. I was so upset I just kicked them off my land, I should have filed a complaint and maybe saved someone else or their dog. Make sure to follow through and keep cops accountable to the law.

[@55Quirll]

I am glad that you were able to save your dog. It seems that dogs know when the wrong person is on their property.

[@sanctifymymusic]

How police get the wrong place so frequently blows me away. If you’re going to serve a warrant or be in a situation you might need a weapon you should be triple checking where you’re at. Even in remote areas, you can still check tax assessors websites and get actual parcel numbers of where you’re at.

[@deanhorne8808]

Google maps and all the technology so available to everyone it's really hard to believe they are getting the wrong place as often as they do!

[@brendafrost7001]

It's only by following through that this crap will stop!

[@Colorado8300]

@@sanctifymymusicit’s because cops in general have a 5th grade IQ

[@joeren8948]

The minute a citizen says that he/she is no longer talking without an attorney, that should be the end of the conversation.

[@warriorsdynastypart275]

Second

[@zayvee.f6343]

@@warriorsdynastypart275 third

[@Furiouspenguin27]

@@zayvee.f6343 fourth

[@JRMAV1]

@@Furiouspenguin27 fifth...amendment

[@TheBazino]

No, that NEEDS to be the end of conversation. If the cops would do their job.

[@mkhartnett]

"I don't understand what the problem is." This is the response they all seem to give when people use their rights given to them. It's pretty ridiculous.

[@Al-Gore-ithm]

"I don't understand what the problem is" then evolves into a stern "here's the thing". That's the exact moment the cop has no more patience for anyone's rights.

[@randyneves9701]

Absolutely rude as well and a jerk

[@utubewillyman]

Yeah, as if we're required to provide a reason why we want someone to leave our property.

[@crozraven]

don't forget the typical "you need to calm down" every time someone argue their questionable behaviors.

[@stevelandess]

- Our rights are not "given" to us by any document (Constitution) or governmental entity. They are "natural" or God-Given rights. The wording of Constitution was to grant specific certain rights to the Federal government. The Bill of Rights enumerates how the government CANNOT infringe on our rights - it does not enumerate the Citizen's rights, since those rights NOT granted to the government are reserved for the people and States.

[@josh.8104]

"What's your name and badge number" "I don't wanna give it to you, I don't give out information" K... **Gets his license plate**

[@timhartherz5652]

Pettyness because being butthurt about his interrupted powertrip. After cutting a chain to a private property, so he can drive his ass to the house to snoop around in the private space of someone whom he knew was in jail. The investigation of the parked car sounds like a bs excuse he made up on the spot, after realizing the property is still inhabitated.

[@gd3369]

another prime example of officers not knowing the LAW ... its the law, when asked an officer his name and badge number they have to give it to you ... this guys should be fired ... the system doesn't need officers like him, especially in todays climate ... so many officers being exposed for what they are ... bad ... there are many many good cops but the bad ones get all the press .. thanks to our corrupt journalists and news networks

[@pullybungieharder]

@@timhartherz5652 According to the cop. he didn't cut the chain. He walked around it.

[@timhartherz5652]

@@pullybungieharder Would have liked to see how he "walked" around the chain... with his f-ing CAR! Something doesn't add up at all in this cop's story, which is why i think he made it up when being caught snooping around. Why even bother in the first place, just tow the abadoned car and contact the registered owner, he will certainly know, who used his car.

[@Glostahdude]

Also highly illegal

[@YouTuber-jz5nd]

The fact that there is absolutely nothing a person can do but watch the police trample their rights and hope it gets resolved in court is crazy.

[@YouTuber-jz5nd]

And even then, the police won't care one bit and will continue doing what they do without any consequences.

[@Kinlui1022]

It's tough, one wrong move they could just shoot you on the spot and still might not get it on his record at the end. As private citizens you are literally rolling a dice hoping that you got a good, respectable officer evrery time you come across them, which is why we are taught to let them win on the spot so you are at least alive to challenge the law later.

[@YouTuber-jz5nd]

@@Kinlui1022 I absolutely agree. Take the ride, fight it in court. At least you'll live. It's sad but true.

[@AndyouareWrong]

What nah wheres all the 2nd and 4th ammendment dickheads at

[@Treebark4Dinner]

Going through this right now. It's pretty depressing.

[@trevoreaves6644]

Imagine you break in to someone’s property and get angry when they tell you to leave😂

[@suoquainen]

No problem. Could do this every day. Damn that different countries have different laws. :)

[@LaMarcheFutilé101]

"I'll leave when I'm done" is some real fuckin' ballsy kind of the-law-is-for-you-not-for-me bullshit.

[@Compufreak]

@@suoquainen Now I'm curious - which country is it that allows you to stay on private property after being told to leave by the owner?

[@suoquainen]

@@Compufreak I knew that this question would come sooner or later. :) But it was a little misunderstanding, because i wasn't really clear in what i meant, sorry. Of course it isn't allowed to stay on a private property if told to leave. But the owner isn't allowed to take his hands unto you or harm you in any way. Otherwise even as intruder you could sue him for that. And the country you were asking for is Germany.

[@Compufreak]

@@suoquainen Sorry but you are still wrong, if someone resists to leave it is allowed to use force, even in germany. "Um einen Hausfriedensbruch abzuwehren bzw. zu beenden oder vorzubeugen, kann ein Hausverbot ausgesprochen werden. Der Hausherr ist befugt, das Hausverbot notfalls mit Gewalt (Notwehr (§ 32 StGB)) durchzusetzen. " (Source: Wikipedia, but can be found on other pages as well).

[@redrobbo1896]

"Id like you to get off my property now please" "Okay, sorry about that, thanks for all your help." "No problem ". Thats how that *should've* went.

[@bigwitt187]

should have*

[@redrobbo1896]

Ok

[@DOLfirst]

@@bigwitt187 should've "gone". The word "should've" is acceptable.

[@stevedavies1261]

Ah thks Seth, I needed a good laugh... Cheers...

[@maxraschi7554]

But sadly it didnt

[@JoeBowlandMusic]

I live in Kalispell and know the officer. He's such a tool! Our job site got robbed last Christmas and he literally laughed at us because our chain was cut that held our tools together. I hope he loses his badge!

[@LegendStormcrow]

Doesn't surprise me.

[@Gluttonite]

He's good with chains I hear.

[@travislong2176]

Hes even got the I was picked on in school haircut.

[@debunkinghistory214]

@@travislong2176 ? I agree he shouldn't have violated rights, but he just has normal short hair.

[@travislong2176]

@@debunkinghistory214 I bet I could line up 10 guys with short hair and u could spot the cop js 😆

[@nate_mccallister]

The old “I’m just making sure everyone is ok,” routine. Dude can’t handle being embarrassed.

[@tommytheshimigami]

The Officer "Your not under an investigation" Next thing he says *police officer also unprofessionally smiles when calling him buddy, which he said sarcastically* "I'm just trying to investigate" The sheer hypocricy.

[@billbush-t5x]

Most of the time "we got a call" Means they called themselves.

[@Mr_Nobody913]

“I can go anywhere I want” and this is a prime example of how we’ve given police way too much power.

[@Art-zs6sl]

I had one tell me he was going to make my life a living hell if I didn't tell him what he wanted to know. To bad for him, I didn't know anything and he eventually figured it out.

[@kevinalmeida7159]

its not power granted to police it was a personal decision to respond as such. dont be a stupid emo

[@jessicataylor7174]

@Gareth Tucker Private property extends to the property line. Although most people choose to have open rights of access for their own convenience it does not mean they do not have the right to erect fences, locked gates and signage that prevents further entrance than the boundary line. When crossing a boundary such as this it is irrelevant whether you are entering a field or a building. Entering through a locked gate on signaged private property is no less a violation than walking through my front door without a warrant. It is illegal. Your second part implies the boundary being at the property line prevents communication in a way beyond allowing access to the front door. It doesn't. If I am asleep and don't answer the door the police can not enter because they want to chat to me. If I am in the bath and literally ignore them at the door, they can not enter just because they want to chat to me. The physical distance between the door and me sleeping (a few metres) or the locked gate and the resident's location on his property (any distance, even miles) are irrelevant, they do not have the right to enter the private property without a warrant. If they are standing at my door or standing by a locked gate the next course of action is the same. They either get a warrant THEN enter or they need to leave and find an alternative way to make contact eg post/phone etc. Does that make sense now? I hope it does, but feel free to ask about anything that doesn't! 😊

[@ZeranZeran]

and this cop has gotten 0 backlash for this, because this man uploaded a video rather than filing a police report or suing him. Sad. Cops are only going to continue to get worse. Buy a gun and be safe.

[@ZeranZeran]

@@Art-zs6sl I had a cop pull this when I was age 16, I immediately got out my phone, began recording and said "NAME AND BADGE NUMBER" he quickly apologized, got in his car, and drove away. Coward pigs

[@XiuHang]

"You're tresspassing." "Call and file a report." Seriously? At this point you are an armed intruder and you're just going to casually be a jerk?

[@motorguy4203]

He should have blocked his truck in and called local police

[@ianblair6750]

@@motorguy4203 he would have shot him.

[@Broletariatt96]

@@motorguy4203 so committing false imprisonment is better? Lol

[@TheJonazas]

@Alex Wynters AMERICA. FUCK YEAH!

[@loomspace]

@Alex Wynters No you wouldn't.

[@kiwibread101]

“Who’s car is it?” It’s Eli’s “It’s not registered to him” He clearly knows who the car belongs to, or at the very least has the ability to access that information. To know it isn’t registered to someone, they have to know who it is registered to. Makes you wonder what the real purpose of the visit was.

[@aurorachoi5030]

Exactly like I knew that was bull as soon as he said they knew where the car was because they can just look at the registration and who it’s attached to

[@MariSalsa27]

What the cop did, looks like a fishing expedition to me. So using the 5th amendemend right to remain silent, seems a very smart move to me.

[@natax1737]

I wonder..

[@brianhurt3801]

I think telephones we're invented telegrams postal service had been invented by the this investigation date

[@aurorachoi5030]

@@brianhurt3801 what?

[@toamaori]

reminds me of this joke... A cop turns up at an old man's farm out in the country, says to him.. "I'm looking for stolen property... I'll be searching your entire farm" The old man replies... "No worries boss, but you wanna stay outta the end paddock" Cop pulls out his badge and says.. "You see this badge? It means I can go wherever I like on your farm.. Got it?" the old man replies "Got it boss." five minutes later the old man hears a blood curdling shriek from the end paddock, and sees the cop screaming running for his life from the biggest meanest bull you've ever seen. The old man cups his hands around his mouth and shouts... "THE BADGE BOSS!... SHOW HIM YOUR BADGE!"

[@luci-fer250]

good one

[@crazycloud2]

I love it, ha ha ha ha

[@R.E.-Gato]

I love how surprised and upset cops get when a private citizen doesn’t want to answer their questions

[@R.E.-Gato]

@@It-s-me-P overly petty? So there’s an acceptable level of pettiness?

[@fernsong8558]

@@It-s-me-P Exercising your rights is petty?

[@kishascape]

Also that 1984 case is BS and needs to be thrown out and barred from being a precedent ever again.

[@GrizzlyOutdoorAdventures]

What a stupid person, that cop just trying to do his job. And they only post this on youtube for the viewing figures and the money you get for these nonsense videos. Get a real job.

[@Cruor34]

@@fernsong8558 Its being petty and rude. I don't HAVE to hold the door open for someone behind me carrying a box, and I don't HAVE to cover my face and turn away when I sneeze in public, but I DO because its being decent. Get it? So if a cop just trying to do his job needs to ask me some questions, I'll answer, even though I may not have to by law. If anyone wants to ask me reasonable questions, I'll answer. If I'm busy and the conversation is getting too long, then I'll excuse myself and leave, but just being rude from the start makes you the asshole. The vast majority of people on ATA may be "within their rights" but they are also all complete assholes who hate all police and all start the conversations rudely. I can think of like 1 ATA video where the guy the cops walk up to wasn't angry and rude from the get go.

[@christian6911]

Seems like the common thing about all these situations is that a cop gets their ego hurt and spiral into pettiness.

[@raezor6941]

The latter half is basically the case with most altercations. I was watching a video on how an instructor, who is now a police commander, had arrested someone because they couldn't move a truck while the owner of said truck- a retired firefighter chief, was actively trying to make sure a car crash victim didn't die on them. The cop, and the DA -the person under that position is now a judge- said that the arrest was lawful under something along "obstruction of justice". Really goes to show how anyone with power has a power trip if their authority is challenged by anyone, really. BTW, thanks to the commitment of that chief, the victim's life was saved, even while it was predicted the victim would die. The chief walked away with dropped charges and handcuff marks, and the blessings of a survivor on the other hand.

[@Steelhorsecowboy]

Yeah, I've noticed that.

[@the_rakan]

Perfect observation. Spot on. Hats off to you sir.

[@kevinalmeida7159]

and pettiness can result in as low as hurt feeling or as bad as painting a target on your back. cops have some scarry power if they are willing to abuse it and have the backing of other officers

[@transfo47]

@@kevinalmeida7159 Basically the Chauvin case.

[@tylerphilco]

“Yeah I’m looking for the owner of this car” “He’s in jail” “Oh ok I guess I’ll just have to harass you then.”

[@ericflores-moreno7558]

I mean I’m genuinely curious as to how the car got there if the owner was in jail

[@cat-vv9xb]

@@ericflores-moreno7558 I mean I'm genuinely curious as to how you wake up every morning with that room temperature IQ of yours. There are so many obvious possibilities for this, such as the owner leaving their car there and took alternative transport to the jail knowing they will be held up for a while.

[@ericflores-moreno7558]

Kittens Chan Kittens Chan well when you get arrested you don’t just just take yourself to jail man the cop who arrested you takes you. Say for example the guy in this video was being arrested for burglary the cop wouldn’t tell him ok go home and come back to jail later. Either way if he did turn himself in parking at a school just seems weird. I don’t see if that was the case why he wouldn’t just leave the car at home or even just at some big parking lot like a Walmart. I dunno man just seems weird to me how someone’s car who’s supposed to be in jail ended up in a school parking lot out of all places

[@cat-vv9xb]

@@ericflores-moreno7558 It really has to be a medical miracle how you even have enough brainpower to wake up every morning. You do realize that there's this concept called "friends and family"? A relative or friend could have easily collected the car on his behalf while he was being arrested. Or, it could very well be one of those areas where the county jail doubles up as a prison and he was given a few days of compassionate notice after a court ruling to settle his personal affairs before surrendering himself at the jail.

[@ericflores-moreno7558]

Kittens Chan again man the car was left at a school, why would a friend or family member leave it at a school and not his house? If it was so easy to explain they wouldn’t be sending police officers to investigate it.

[@SixteenTonesStudio]

"so, who is Eli to you?" you are DEFINITELY under investigation with that question, he's trying to establish a social network for the purpose of investigating it as a criminal network

[@PaulJosephdeWerk]

"Hello 9-1-1, I've got an armed person trespassing on my property bothering my renters, and he won't leave even though I've asked him to."

[@urpgag2]

as soon as osifer asshat went at my tennant I would have told him to get onto public property and been on the phone doing Exactly that. that cop was armed and stupid with a barney fife gun on the side of his dirty ass. he was out of control

[@jamest3552]

🙂

[@DarianCaplinger]

@@urpgag2 Unfortunately, that's not how it works. Just as the landlord for a renter is not allowed to make entry to the property they are renting, without giving notice beforehand, for the sake of the law, these are considered separate domiciles. The LEO would be within their power to attempt contact at both. Obviously, in this case, the officer already knew or reasonably should have known the subject he was "investigating" was already in custody. The deputy was clearly trespassing, as there were absolutely no exigent circumstances for him to cross through a chained gate. He not only jeopardized his own safety, he also violated the civil rights of those who lived on the property. It is a clear violation of the prohibition of illegal searches and seizures as stated in the 4th Amendment. As I've said in at least one other reply to this post, anything the officer would normally be able to use to charge someone with, like illegal substances in plain view, would or should be tossed as fruit of the poisonous tree. The guy that lived there was much more gracious than I would probably have been.

[@WingmanSR]

@@urpgag2 If I have an issue with the police, I definitely wouldn't trust the police to come handle it.

[@HuntMountain06]

Wait. You forgot a part. Don’t forget to add “Hes asking questions about a vehicle I abandoned at a school because one of my renters was in jail after I called the cops on him and reported him for assault and I no longer wanted his vehicle on my property so I drove it down to the school while he was in jail and abandoned it. Thereby illegally evicting and abandonment of property. And he unlooped my cattle gate to ask these questions.” More to this then the video.

[@rkstevenson5448]

"911? Yeah, there's an armed individual on my property, refusing to leave. He claims he's a peace officer, but he's refusing to identity himself."

[@rack391]

And then you would have 20 Police all over your property. LOL

[@youtubecensorsmycomments8036]

If there wasn't so many chickenshit people in the US to hold their ground against tyrants that enter their property unlawfully and carrying weapons only pulling out a phone But instead pulled out a weapon on the officer this would not be an epidemic in this country PERIOD. 2 Amendment was made for moments just like this...

[@spencercachat7233]

@@youtubecensorsmycomments8036 exactly. You can't go and film on a police precinct sidewalk without them coming out and rudely kicking you out and threatening to arrest you. So why should they be allowed to come onto your property and not identity themselves. Assholes.

[@deusvult6920]

@@spencercachat7233 actually you can

[@spencercachat7233]

@@deusvult6920 actually you can't without someone fucking with you

[@SweetSideOfFries]

"Im not investigating you" "Okay good because I'm not answering any more questions" "Okay here's the deal, I'm conducting an investigation here...."

[@r2Kd0ugernaut]

for real, what a load of bullshit. it doesnt matter if an officer is "investigating" you, every single word you say will be used when it turns into an investigation...

[@Wbshadowgames]

Lmao

[@Mystic_Void]

Yeah well hes doing an investigation but not investigating the person who he is asking. Hes gathering the information on what he is investigating

[@sounder9393]

I noticed that too.

[@lukaseldenrust2637]

@@Mystic_Void what does the investigation have to do with his name if he isn’t a part of the investigation?

[@alienarachnid5367]

“Was it locked?” “Uh yeah it had a chain on it” 😂 ridiculous

[@bigtalk2598]

Rules for thee, not for me.

[@DoubtedPumpkin]

The worst part is the cop parroting the “I don’t answer questions” to him asking for name and badge number. If you think the guy is acting ridiculous, why would you do the same thing? Surely a police officer would lead by example but I guess not

[@DucDrace]

Isnt there a law to arrest people who are not cooperating?

[@fairwitness7473]

@@DucDrace well, they like to call it obstruction or impeding an investigation. 🤷‍♀️

[@renegadetenor]

"well-spoken" in their world means you're proficient at speaking out both sides of your mouth. At any time, anywhere, that's how you know you're speaking with an officer. Dumbassed pricks. (I really am naturally pro-cop by the way, but I no longer trust any of them...they're going to have to earn that back). Meanwhile I shall call them by the names that become them.

[@trippyfast6739]

@@DucDrace only if they commit a crime or refuse a lawful order.

[@stiaininbeglan3844]

​@@DucDrace The officer needs reasonable grounds to assume that the uncooperative citizen has DONE something illegal. Simply refusing to answer questions or comply with unlawful requests by the officer is entirely within the citizen's legal rights, even in Canada. Resisting arrest, however, is unlawful behaviour, and there's actually a video (at least one, and I think on this channel) in which a lawyer is arrested for "obstruction of justice" in refusing to give his client's personal belonging to the officer. The lawyer knew what would happen, even if the officer didn't. I definitely recommend watching that (or those) to see how to react to being arrested for doing nothing illegal.

[@GeneralKenobiSIYE]

"I don't understand what your problem is." and that's the problem! If an AMERICAN'S RIGHTS are the very last thing you take into account, if at all, then you are not fit to protect and serve the people.

[@Nojomojo1]

Yea, cops like him are why people like me are standoff-ish to pigs. I've got a problem with Authority, you've got a problem with having Authority

[@travisfoster1071]

@@powerslave3473 only there to serve and protect their paycheck.

[@tomreid5002]

But yet you wear a mask

[@GeneralKenobiSIYE]

@@tomreid5002 So you think no shoes no shirt and no service is violating your rights too, eh? It's your right to walk into a private business shirtless?

[@bradleynguyen7870]

@@tomreid5002 Ahhh you're one those people.

[@PipByMac]

"There was a locked door on the front of your house but I don't understand why that makes you upset I'm eating your cereal, officer."

[@thevoicestoldmetoagain4627]

If its PB Crunch, id be livid.

[@DemisBlue]

"You aren't under investigation for anything" *2 seconds later* "This is an investigation-"

[@thatguy-ne5bx]

yeah thats means the officer is investigating the car down the road and asking the neighbours whats going on. He made that pretty clear

[@jamessurprisal2286]

He meant that the guy filming was not the subject of an investigation.

[@skarloeythomas5172]

Holy horseshit reasoning Batman.

[@GRBSnatch]

@@jamessurprisal2286 for now lol

[@ko300zx]

You may be short a few brain cells.

[@Gredddfe]

"Only criminals have anything to fear from the ..." We all have every reason to fear a police officer who doesn't know the law and is a straight-up egotist.

[@nzfalcon8698]

No thats not true ,innocent people get harassed and convicted by police for something they did not do and end up in jail ,just saying

[@JanMike9]

Only you yourself is looking out for your best interests--never forget that.

[@coop5329]

The cops ARE the criminals. To date the cops have stolen 68.8 BILLION dollars from citizens not even accused of any crime, under the civil forfeiture act. And the Supreme Court has ruled this is just fine and dandy.

[@rangerhawk]

I'll tell ya what we have to fear more than police officers who do not know the law though, criminals. Dirty cops exist and need to be drummed out of the force, possibly prosecuted. Ignorant cops exist and need to be educated. However, being someone who had a stepson and three close friends murdered over the decades, I can attest from experience that all criminals protest their innocence. Fact is, we have far more to fear from criminals, just sayin. Timmy was killed at 14, no amount of justice is enough, he would have been 39 now. Unless you've been through it, there is no way you can understand the regret and anger.

[@dennislock3415]

It should be the legal duty for law enforcement to police their own ranks to get rid of bad apples.That being said if it weren't for law enforcement we would be beset by groups of marauders on a regular basis,look around there are plenty out there of all races.We need every officer to be a Matt Dillon not a Gengis Kahn.

[@TandJgaming]

“I would find a new place to live if I was you because your landlord wouldn’t give me any information and asked me to leave when I was trespassing, this is ridiculous”

[@jacob_evergreen]

At that point, the officers Ego was through the roof and was mad he didn't have control over the citizen.

[@jaymcdude1291]

That's a good landlord.

[@TandJgaming]

@James Hardon even if that were true (it’s not) that’s not why the cop is there. He’s literally trespassing and not leaving when asked. What he did was straight up illegal.

[@TandJgaming]

@James Hardon I’m not, the cop here by definition is a criminal.

[@jaymcdude1291]

@James Hardon You are quite mistaken. I own 80 acres of land. I have my house. Than a building with two apartments in it. IDK where you came up with that one.

[@amac8237]

This is a beautiful example of their thought process. You can see he is genuinely shocked that someone is questioning his overreaching authority. You get used to pushing people around for so long your surprise when people start to push back. And people are pushing back.

[@jamesbond1231]

People have always been pushing back. It's only recently that things are being recorded. If you think this is the exception you're poorly mistaken.

[@Jiu-Jitsu-Robot]

ALL of them.

[@mdcraig62]

2:10 "that's OK, I'm recording too" Well, the difference is that my record will not be magically lost or erased somehow.

[@sally2395]

Lol you child these are police officers they deal with idiots pushing back every single day

[@jamesbond1231]

@@sally2395 the only idiots are the officers themselves.

[@matthewhall9692]

Can you imagine telling someone that they should find a new place to live because the person they live next to won't allow them to trespass on their property?!

[@dirkthewrench]

"Jesus, unbelievable, I have to follow the law? What was even point of become a cop if I can't break the rules???"

[@tenminutetokyo2643]

There are in fact many laws which limit LEOs. In fact you can sue them under those laws for violations. Such as “Deprivation of rights under color of law”. Arbitrary and illegal violations by LEOs constitutes “color of law”.

[@rayabercrombie6239]

He expects the officer to ID himself but he's rude n "doesn't talk to cops" when roles reversed! Childish AF!

[@Smurf5738]

@@rayabercrombie6239 they are required to give you their name and badge number if you ask

[@David_Bellows]

@@Smurf5738 not in all states

[@rayabercrombie6239]

@@Smurf5738 I know this but I'd tell them f off... I have to shoe respect and give you mine but you can be a child and refuse? Write me up!! Lol

[@tharealminipunch]

Anytime the cop says: "oh you're filming? me too" -- you know he's gonna get an F 😂😂

[@Chris-dg6km]

Yeah, sadly the cops video evidence is backed by him being an officer of the court and you are shit on a stick in court if your evidence isn't on the original device used or memory card. They will always find a way to discredit your evidence versus their evidence.

[@jtfike]

@@Chris-dg6km well, the evidence should match so I dunno what you are going on about.

[@grantharriman284]

From my limited understanding of the law it varies from just being courteous to having a duty to notify that you are being recorded on the part of the officer depending on the location. It can help establish a rapport and diffuse some of the tension. Not really an F in my eyes.

[@markrayes2973]

i usually respond with "yea but mines is backed up to the cloud and won't conveniently get corrupted or turned off when it suits me" 😐 usually has them going really, but how many times have we seen this happen? a body cam obstructed on purpose, either physically or tapping on it to distort the audio... or turning it off

[@markrayes2973]

@@Chris-dg6km meta data doesn't lie so that argument is irrelevant, they will try and destroy that argument by trying to claim it can be tampered but a expert can easily destroy their argument by giving simple facts and easy to follow hypotheticals

[@Chaotic_Observer]

“Do you take this woman to be your lawfully wedded wife?” “I dont answer questions”

[@joshuajimenez6585]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👌

[@JulioMo]

Nice!

[@saphired02]

🤣🤣

[@justinsbestlife4068]

Highly underrated comment

[@marasmusine]

"Would you like to make that a meal, or do you just want the sandwich?" "I don't answer questions"

[@monkeypolice3048]

I had an officer enter my sister's house illegally when she was not home and only I was in it. Then harassed me and also said how can we afford the house we stayed with a low income. I felt assaulted and harassed but didn't understand the law at the time.

[@trevorlambert4226]

I like how the officer tells him he's not under investigation, as if that means anything. They're legally allowed to lie to you.

[@arthurchadwell9267]

It is a "crime", however, for you to lie to them.

[@MonteCarlo-rx4hu]

A lot of people don't know this. Through the course of an investigation police are allowed to make "Honest Mistakes." Judges legalized officer's lying if they can conjure a good enough reason before or after they tell you lies and under the law it is justifiable. You get caught lying and see if the system is fair and balanced.

[@jhaeck1]

people lie to them all the time

[@kishascape]

Also that 1984 case is BS and needs to be thrown out and barred from being a precedent ever again.

[@1USAUSA]

That's a FACT!!! They are legally allowed to LIE to YOU to get what they want ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL GOBERMINT... yep... So, just do as he or she tells you to, then, you will HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT... They know what they are doing and they are the EXPERT at RIGHT FROM WRONG...Plus, they ONLY speak the TRUTH and don't know how to LIE... ROTFLMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@WorshiptheTrinity]

Cops that get frustrated because you’re exercising your rights just blows me away.

[@nothanks9503]

They’re the same kind of person in the comments of pro police videos saying disgusting racist shit and conflating every black persons with George Floyd who apparently was faking it

[@Chase615000]

Exercising your rights doesn't have to be an obnoxious exchange. The home owner was a piece of shit from the start as well, which was not needed. I understand knowing your rights, but I never understand why these people feel the need to be blatantly obnoxious about it.

[@nnoir]

@@Chase615000 No, the cops needs to do his job and not be obnoxious. Cops are too used to getting anything they want from any citizens totally ignoring laws and even AMENDMENTS.

[@DaileyBemaris]

@@Chase615000so a person can enter your locked property with no warrant, can conduct an illegal investigation, harass your neighbor, slander you to their face, and can refuse to leave after being ordered off of private property they had no legal right to be on and somehow, in your tiny smooth brain, you’re on the trespassers side? You should stop licking boots. The rubber is rotting your brain away, pal.

[@rijjhb9467]

@@Chase615000 he asked him nicely, he even said please! I wish obnoxious people were like that.

[@hunterglass1840]

I'm a retired police detective and this video was well done. After retiring I have had a Deputy trespassing on my farm and stating he had the authority to go where he wants.....wrong. No warrant, no entry. Contact by phone. No trespassing signs mean no trespassing. As far as the the abandoned vehicle, just tow it.

[@failadin1]

You shoulda popped some shots at that cop for unlawfully trespassing, they need to learn their place and forcefully.

[@handle-g2]

@@failadin1 Um not a good idea? If he did he'd end up being in jail. And you shouldn't shoot cops if they're doing something wrong

[@failadin1]

And cops shouldn't shoot innocent people if they're doing something wrong, They'll learn their lesson soon enough.

[@handle-g2]

@@failadin1 Who said they did

[@TheCWasson12]

Question: you mentioned no trespassing signs mean no trespassing. Does that mean that the absence of a no trespassing signs means your rights are different should someone you don't wish to be on your property is on your property?

[@Dr.Reason]

I recently caught a State Trooper and F&G officer trespassing on my property while I was home. I confronted them and the Trooper immediately agreed that they were in violation but gave weak excuses for it. He didn’t have explanation for why he didn’t knock on the door and get permission. The bold willingness to knowingly trespass without apology was alarming.

[@LostWallet]

the owner clearly confused and concerned as to how the officer gain access through the locked gate. you can hear the concern in his pause because now he might have a security problem on his hand

[@SuperSlacker69]

Or realizes that the cop just vandalized his gate to get inside.

[@dirksteinbach9370]

the owner said it was locked, the officer said something about a chain before getting interrupted - my question: was it locked with a lock, or just a 'loose' chain wrapped around => does both count as locked? because if not and if there was no lock, would it mean the officer wasn't trespassing?

[@Rugg-qk4pl]

@@dirksteinbach9370 he mentioned something like "i don't know if you have horses" or something, which makes it sound like that gate is just too keep animals in and might not have an actual lock

[@HuntMountain06]

@@dirksteinbach9370 Montana is a Open Range State. The duty is to lock animals out not lock them in. Many houses have cattle gates between road and front door. I’ve got a picture of this house and this cattle gate. Paddock clearly visible from the road. The gate was closed but no locked. Also it’s likely the vehicle the officer was talking about was parked on the property when the guy who was driving it went to jail. The guy filming ditched the car at the school down the road to get it off of his property while the driver was in jail. The guy filming called the cops on the guy in jail. You can google the articles.

[@andysmith1996]

@@dirksteinbach9370 The video cites a case that says that police are able to approach a house to ask questions, so I don't see how entering through the unlocked but chained gate would be trespassing or an unreasonable search. Also, Norris refuses to confirm that he is the landowner, so the police officer could argue that he did not know Norris had the right to tell him to leave.

[@arthurhouston3]

Depty was lying, he is on fishing expedition trying build case on man in jail.

[@furiogiunta7886]

seemed that way to me too.

[@theangryquad3127]

Assumption isn't fact!

[@fortifarse]

@@theangryquad3127 nobody said it was.

[@raytorres2685]

🚔🐷 has the power to take a person's Constitutionally Protected Rights at the drop of a dime, any word you say "WILL" be used against you. Never incriminate yourself 🤫 your life "WILL" be investigated

[@cjuare123]

You don’t know how to spell

[@mikev207]

Like vampires, they can't enter a dwelling unless they're invited.

[@nyatrue401]

Thats hysterical

[@rc59191]

They are bloodsuckers between them stealing peoples property and wasting tax dollars on busting Uber drivers giving out rides.

[@jamesroales2684]

I wish the sun affected them the same way. At least they'd be out there only half the time they are now.

[@deborahminter6231]

🤣

[@420bongking]

except they just do it anyway

[@pb4life1602]

What about the officer's failure to Identify himself? That should also be a HUGE concern in addition to the other problems !

[@MACE1-1]

Failure to identify can also be perceived as impersonating law enforcement...That opens up another big can of chocolate covered worms...

[@royjacobson5561]

He should be fired for not showing his identify, so this mean he was trespass for no reason. Hope these folks should charge him for trespass without showing them his identify.

[@tombsy2826]

ALWAYS file a complaint/persue legal action! We cant let interactions where our rights are clearly being violated go undocumented.

[@jonburrows2684]

I'm trying to figure out what became of this. Does anybody know? What happened to this officer? Was he charged with trespassing?

[@mikemcg3921]

WHile i dont disagree--- it is common to face reprocussions for filing a complaint at least where i have lived

[@tombsy2826]

@@mikemcg3921 Departmental corruption is a terrifying thing

[@dirtcurt1]

@@jonburrows2684 No apparently nothing except it got posted on the internet and so far on the way to 5 million views. The elected Sheriff probably not happy with this video being posted for an eternal time.

[@netsider]

There should be an app which records a police interaction and streams it to a server where all the different auditors can access it. FB and KZbin work, but there's no way to see every live stream (or maybe they would suffice).

[@allways28]

refused to leave then dragged his heals every step of the way , then topping off with refusing to identity himself. he tried to project calm but this cop is a rouge

[@trevordeane3940]

It is illegal for an officer to not identify himself. This is an offence and should be brought to the attention of the superintendent general or similar of the police in that area. In nearly every country in the world except China, Burma, Chili, North Korea, Iraq and Iran, an officer is obliged to give his or her surname, number, rank and station attached to. To not do this is an offence.

[@FishSlapped172]

@@trevordeane3940 no it's not. Contrary to popular belief a cop does not have to give their name and badge number by law. It is most departments policy, but not law in the United States.

[@hazyblue69]

@@trevordeane3940 There is NO legal requirement for a police officer to identify himself or what dept he works for. There may be a dept policy, but certainly NO legal requirement.

[@theangryquad3127]

He started being a dick after the guy initiated being a dick......

[@EricRedbear]

@@FishSlapped172 You're right, though there is a state law here in Wisconsin requiring them to identify when asked.

[@branstangsmokes6201]

Us citizen “im going to exercise my right and not answer any more questons” *cops with oakleys* “alright whats the deal buddy”

[@raezor6941]

I wouldn't say the Oakleys is a good foundation of power, but accurate.

[@Marcodiazgrey]

Im not your buddy pal.

[@branstangsmokes6201]

@@Marcodiazgrey im not your pal friend

[@alexmitchell7083]

@@branstangsmokes6201 I’m not your friend guy.

[@grantpreece9087]

@@alexmitchell7083 I'm not your guy friend.

[@ronallen6578]

I've said this before that even if you can't get a cent from a lawsuit, you need to file charges to get these thugs written up or have them removed from their department!!

[@pondlakes]

Filing a lawsuit costs money that not everyone can spare

[@ronallen6578]

@@pondlakes There are attorneys and others that are willing to look at your case and make a determination if you actually have a case and then take action. Don't give up without researching it at least. How else will these criminals be taken out??

[@Gimble_Games]

@@ronallen6578 Yeah if I ever, god forbid, find myself in a similar situation I would not open the door and I have cameras hidden nearby any entry way into my home so if they wanted to pull that shit I would just wait till I had access to an attorney and exercise attorney client privilege to ensure my attorney gets any relevant footage and would add that I will only seek monetary damages if the officers involved aren't terminated without any pay or form of compensation from the department or state in exchange for only asking to have my legal fees paid instead. I would be interested only in seeing the bastards squirm as I screw them out of their jobs :)

[@SkunkApe407]

There are literally thousands of lawsuits against police that have been awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Your comment is patently false.

[@ronallen6578]

@@SkunkApe407 Whats false

[@Thumpster59166]

Notice how much of an attitude the cop had as soon as he realized he was in the wrong. Now imagine some stranger who is not a cop coming onto your property without permission, then getting hostile when told to leave. That's a crime.

[@rhondakendrick2563]

110%

[@jaustin5390]

after the first off my property..call goes to 911 someone armed is trespassing on my property.door shuts ..better hope that 3a stops the ss109.

[@audrey2658]

Youre allowed to shoot them in a lot of states, but only if theyve never stepped foot in a police academy, if they have then expect to be laying in a pool of your own blood in prison because the guards got "vengeance"

[@mlauer]

....if the landowner is black it's probably okay.

[@Thumpster59166]

@@audrey2658 I'm a retired guard. We don't get "vengeance" for cops. Matter of fact, we don't get along with most of them. They get paid a lot more to only be around violent criminals for a few minutes. We basically had to live with them and be outnumbered 100 to 1. Lol

[@unclebary519]

"Are you telling me i cant violate your rights" "but im mark"

[@tenminutetokyo2643]

Most cops are failed losers. That’s why they join the force. They crave power.

[@h2o848]

@@tenminutetokyo2643 that is so incredibly sad

[@rickschenk7107]

lol

[@casey360360]

@@tenminutetokyo2643 ehhh, big cities I’ll agree. Sheriffs and small towns are another story. Power corrupts even the most honest of men. There’s a lot of bad eggs but there’s even more good cops out there, the good cops don’t ever get anywhere near as much attention as the bad ones, as with everything in life.

[@clansymbiont8688]

Oh, hi Mark

[@ethanschend6638]

Cops get so booty hurt when they can't do anything they want. It's helarious.

[@stevedavies1261]

Yup, their "Do as I say or else" policing gets torched when a citizen knows his/her rights and chooses to exercise them...Along with the help of cell camera, of course...

[@wutflex]

Not really even funny though because that same ego trip is what kills people.

[@Bovafett]

@@wutflex agreed! This isn't funny. This is also ignorance of purview and authority that is directly related to his job.

[@jonathonmartin7563]

@@wutflex When people say it's funny they think they can do whatever they want, it doesn't really mean it's funny it's a sarcastic way to say that it's wrong that they think they are able to do whatever they please.... It's funny how you thought they were seriously laughing about it... Or it's hilarious... Same meaning

[@wutflex]

@@jonathonmartin7563 Ditto its funny how you thought I was seriously critiquing the comment. I was simply pointing out the irony 😅 I'm not an alien that just landed on earth yesterday..

[@willamsomp9140]

This way we need stand your ground laws against cops trespassing in people home and property

[@stanleykeith7863]

Indiana has a law this cop wouldn't like

[@peacefreedom4930]

I’m still stuck on the fact that he broke into a gated property that was chained and then asked if there’s a problem. Wow! Seriously? Yes, there’s a damn problem. You’re trespassing on private property. Wtf?

[@Tsamokie]

Trespassing via a B&E.

[@jbb8382]

Don't be dumb, the officer was not trespassing, he was conducting an investigation!

[@oceanic8424]

@@jbb8382 Without a proper warrant?? What the hell is that about??

[@jbb8382]

@@oceanic8424 was trying to find out if someone was injured or needed immediate assistance, thus no warrant needed

[@oceanic8424]

@@jbb8382 You need probable cause for that, or else it becomes the police's universal excuse to break the law. There was no indications whatsoever that anyone was in any distress...no fire, no smoke, no one screaming "help", nothing at all.

[@SRartz25]

"call and file and report then" right because that does anything. kudos to this private citizen for being as cordial as possible

[@campusizzle6315]

@Man Of Chai Tea no but if you ever go to court for something related your behavior will play a big part.

[@donb8088]

I wonder if this clear violation of the law by a local officer could be reason to call 911 about the armed trespasser harassing those who live on the property, requesting a state officer?

[@joannem3568]

There's NOTHING you can do , it's just like the rest of government, they are all in on it, we are all screwed

[@Sel-Shackfield]

Call the sheriff's department and report a trespassing.

[@SatanAzerath]

Should have gotten a little louder, probably would have worked in his favor. Nice people get walked on.

[@adamchapman8632]

“So here’s the thing” means you’re about to hear justification for nonsense.

[@scottsound4711]

Classic...

[@fortifarse]

"In this day and age"

[@Goulash45]

“What you need to understand...”

[@bryanrmcnair01]

Copsplaining

[@ILLeeT36]

“I don’t understand what your problem is” As an armed gang member breaks into your property to harass you and your neighbour

[@jennifer60515]

The cop’s response when the guy says he is not going to answer any questions without a lawyer present is very telling. He is very condescending from that point forward and we all have constitutional rights for this very reason. He was on that man’s property illegally, and he got caught. These cops do whatever they want to do, and as long as every investigation into them is an internal investigation, they will not stop. Third-party investigations are necessary.

[@Maldoror200]

@jennifer6515.., VERRY WELL SPOKEN, Ms"6515" ~Peace~Kyl..🥀

[@atlgradybaby69]

This guy has to be one of,if not the most, informative KZbin narrator ever. I watch whatever he post because I know I’m gonna learn something each time

[@conflictortiz8906]

Facts

[@markandrews6054]

I watch this guys videos from the United Kingdom and although the laws are different here compared to over there on your side of the Atlantic Ocean I find the content very educational and interesting.

[@umamagei]

I believe, though I could be wrong, that the guy narrating isn't the one who creates the content, in older videos it was a different gentleman narrating, seems he hired the narrator or got a friend to do it.

[@MrRight-vf2bm]

No lie

[@joepinkston6842]

@@umamagei you are not wrong, the original creator had some kind of surgery involving his voice. Afterwards this narrator took over. The video creator still writes the script for this narrator.

[@phillhuddleston9445]

He told the cop is was his friends car and his friend was in jail, what more did the cop want, that should have concluded his investigation at that place.

[@Tsamokie]

YAGOTDATSHITRITE.

[@Tsamokie]

@fosterpainter He was being a cloaca?

[@urpgag2]

he came wanting to snoop without a warrent. from the git go he would know that owner was jailed

[@johnserton7997]

The car wasn’t registered to him

[@dandogful]

And both guys should have closed their doors in his face.

[@princessaz79]

The deputy knew the guy was in jail. He just wanted to snoop on the property.

[@MmeHyraelle]

Yea he already got the name that's not hard to figure.

[@jamesm.3967]

And you know that because?

[@elflordyt6830]

@@jamesm.3967 his attitude. He thought no one was home and eas gonna steal shit. You can see it and hear it in his language and body language.

[@jc.1191]

Bingo

[@Brindlebrother]

Hippity hoppity, citizens' property is...still citizens' property, haha

[@brentj.peterson6070]

Funny how the cop turned it into "wanting to make sure the person is ok".. because he's on camera. What a tool. Thank God for video.

[@veryinteresting591]

Ego is always their undoing. They can’t stand it when they aren’t in charge.

[@JohnO318]

@william bush People like you are the reason law enforcement has to walk on eggshells & people end up getting killed.

[@dkastil]

william bush I bet lol

[@ricktrombley5235]

@william bush they literally are in charge in certain scenarios. This isn't one of them

[@kylerBD]

@william bush r/iamverybadass

[@Astares9]

@@JohnO318 problem is cops

[@herrklugscheiser2330]

Alternate title: „Police Officer gets triggered for being told to leave.“

[@KevinBenecke]

That's "Entitled police officer."

[@DarianCaplinger]

@@mark3960 Sadly, very few cops actually know about this kind of stuff. I worked for many years in the courts before retiring as a Deputy Sheriff, so I knew all about the intricacies of these things. I knew from the moment the narrator mentioned a locked gate, the deputy was treading on very, very, very thin ice. The moment the subject of his investigation was revealed to already be in police custody in jail, the ice started to crack, and the moment he was invited to leave the same way he came in, he fell through the ice. Everything from there on he would have garnered would be completely inadmissible in court, even if he found drugs in plain view. To the best of my recollection, out of the 6 months I spent in the academy, only about 15 minutes of it was spent discussing situations like this. You'd think, being in one of only a handful of occupations which people could sue for violation of civil rights, they would stress this much, much harder during the academy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[@MrJustice36]

The POLICE want you to abide by the codes, STATUTES, but the same statutes you must follow, the POLICE stomp on because of "'DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY". The secret criminals in charge who make these "statutes" allow a long leash for POLICE to break laws which we must follow, until they eventually go too far, then they step in and do something about it.

[@MrJustice36]

@@mark3960 Just simply NEVER open your front door for the POLICE when they give their obnoxious knock. Even if they know your in there, without a warrant, they can't break into your house, nor do you even need to talk to them. They'll eventually get frustrated and leave...

[@republicansthatdidntvotefo1605]

Hi I'm officer mark I'm investigating a scumbag that assaulted a minor that lives off the grid here... his vehicle is at the school. For some reason the vehicles not registered to the scumbag? Son of scumbag Or very good friend of scumbag responds We have 2 Minor Children in our basement in small cages, But your not allowed to look. It's really horrible how we losing all our rights To commit crimes.. Take the truck To the car compact...

[@axelsharpshire6457]

The more I watch these videos, the more reason I believe there are a fairly large number of officers out there who joined the police force for the wrong reason.

[@nickforsythe6379]

Bullies who have yet to receive come uppance. The white throne judgement amd their inevitable tumble into hell still won't open their eyes to the wickedness they harbor. Good riddance. Hemp rope is the cure.

[@egwthe1]

Power

[@kensterling5217]

I know a medium size City that has a College and the Drug Cartel basically runs the Police Department, the DA's Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the Chop Shops. Some things that have happened, actually ended up on TV Shows. But Only the little guys get busted.

[@1USAUSA]

@@egwthe1 NOT ONLY THAT, Avelina... Also to hide behind the system.... so they won't be suspected of any WRONG DOING... lol... *Like this one cop who murdered his wife and made it look like suicide. Then, all the detectives and his police department botched the investigation and tampered with evidence. They even went as far as lying about the coroner's finding that cause of the death was self-inflected gunshot wound, when in fact coroner's finding was INCONCLUSIVE... All this in the hope of covering it... It got so bad, they had to bring in INDEPENDENT investigators... what they found was SHOCKING... All the detectives LIED about their findings and even overlooked obvious evidence at the crime scene, his police department LIED on their POLICE REPORT that this cop had nothing to do with her death, evidence that were collected went missing, Lied about the coroner's findings, etc,etc,etc... In the end, the case had to be retried.* SMH!!! 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

[@robcoop6521]

They were taught incorrectly. They may have joined to serve and protect. But that is not what they actually do. Dude obviously thought he is above the law. He was trained to be above the law. Watched too much NCIS or other cop shows where they are above the law. It may have started out as wanting to help, but you can tell they just are trained wrong. The problem is people, civilians, believe the cop is always right and looking out for them. They believe the cop is always there to protect. They support the cops. Think everyone a cop talks to is a criminal. The support is there for this type of behavior ignoring legal shit. That's the problem, is our society supports cops doing this. While those of us who have dealt with cops, or watch this channel, know hell nah get off my property.

[@ericgelder1]

And since he revoked permission to be on the land cop is now considered an armed trespasser, and should be dealt with as such

[@crazycloud2]

It used to be this way. But back then the Sheriff could at any time needed form a posse, And come to your land to inform you, then leave. The Sheriff's are elected by the people, The police work for whoever pays them. If you have a good Sheriff, let them know you support them. We didn't in most cases have a active policing force, the Sheriff and deputies were all most towns had and they actually carry a lot of power.

[@benjaminperez2326]

He doesn’t get his way, so he kicks off. His disingenuous concern for Eli’s well being is one of their most deceptive lies. This is ALL about revenue collection. I wouldn’t speak to an armed person who trespassed on my property either. Many of them also throw out their opinionated snide remarks. He was deliberately creating conflict between neighbors. His calm friendly demeanor hides the real Deputy Mark, who can turn on a dime.

[@johndavis1217]

"His calm friendly demeanor". he was a complete asshole. He wasn't calm. He was pissed.

[@robv5834]

How is this about revenue collection? It’s an abandoned vehicle I’m sure that parking lot wanted removed.

[@kurtwetzel154]

@@robv5834 The cop was investigating trying to get any info from the neighbors. If they had a affiliation with the man in jail in anyway the cop could use what the neighbors said against them. Possibly charge them via the law or put the neighbors in jail. The car left the school was the cops last concern just a excuse.

[@Stefan_Van_pellicom]

@@johndavis1217 I would be too.

[@TheLunarLegend]

'How'd you get in here?' 'Through the locked gate is that a problem?' Uh, yeah. That's called breaking and entering mr. officer.

[@elainevankat5353]

The officer knew it was wrong... to enter the locked gate! He wasn’t expecting anyone to know their rights!!

[@rack391]

There was a chain on the gate not a lock

[@elainevankat5353]

@@rack391 The Officer said it was a “locked gate” That’s a good question (how did the officer unlock it).

[@rack391]

@@elainevankat5353 You may want to go back and listen again the guy said locked the officer said there was a chain on it. The court can decide if the cop had a right to go through the gate. But the cop did not cut any chains or locks. There was obviously a chain wrapped around keeping the gate shut that the I guess owner thinks meant Locked. There is a thing called the Girlscout Rule that would this guy think the same thing if a girlscout selling cookies saw there was no lock and took the chain off and came thru that gate? As I said that would be for a court to decide

[@elainevankat5353]

@@rack391 I totally agree! (it did seem odd that the officer) would be able to unlock a locked gate. The officer was still an A*s hole!!! Lol

[@omar1s1]

The officer knew Eli was in jail and the car was Eli's or how else would he know to go to Eli's residence for an inquiry about a random car?

[@LaMarcheFutilé101]

But he just wanted to find out if anyone was in daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanger! By walking onto someone's property with a weapon and getting belligerent when he was asked to leave! What I'm saying is, the danger people were in was inside his heart along.

[@Mitch3343]

The vehicle wasn't registered to anyone. It had a peice of mail in it. Thats where he got the address.

[@tonyabsoluteam3456]

and if the cop knows that the car isn't registered to the guy in jail, then what is he doing there? I would think logic would state that you would go to the person on the registrations house. In my opinion there is literally no reason for that cop to be there.

[@HuntMountain06]

@@tonyabsoluteam3456 Because the school is just down the road from this property. The guy filming this called the cops on a domestic dispute while Eli was living at the address. Had him arrested. Then the guy filming ditched Eli’s car down the road at the school. Essentially evicted him and abandoning his property while he was in Jail. You can google news articles about it. Guy filming is a piece of work.

[@tonyabsoluteam3456]

@@HuntMountain06 good point!

[@DeadlyChinchilla]

The fact he was just investigating a stranded vehicle is also VERY strange. You just tow abandoned cars, you don't go door to door like this over them. I'm glad they refused to answer any more questions. They just ask Guilt-Seeking questions anymore. Also, one check of their system would have shown "Eli" was in jail already, where they could talk to him easily. Now imagine if "Eli" had any illicit substances in that car and the homeowner had answered more questions, they'd just link them and assume they were all users.

[@ko300zx]

Because of the note left. Some real scholars here.

[@williamhebrlee415]

As a former Judicial Officer, this Officer was in the wrong, period.

[@HespersQuest]

And nobody's gonna hold him accountable unless Mr. Norris lawyers up, files charges, spends a ton of money, and angers the obviously-overreaching local police - risking future abuses of power.

[@zephyrdelight3411]

@@HespersQuest sounds fun 😑

[@johndrake300]

Mr Hebrlee, I posted a comment here on this video,would you mind reading it and let me know what you think about it please sir?

[@spuriouseffect]

Wrong. Your lovely Supreme Court ruled that they can cross any fence and even set up cameras to spy on you without a warrant. Government officials are not subject to trespassing laws. Isn't that just grand? WTF

[@GregBurch]

@@spuriouseffect That is absurdly creepy.

[@Ellensai]

The cop got everything he needed to continue his investigation, the guy was in jail and it's his car. Job done move on. The rest was just his ego taking over.

[@tomfoolery333]

A LEO with an ego. SSSSHHHHOOOOOOOCKING.

[@Philip550c]

But it wasn't his car

[@TL2354]

Maybe you can try to state facts next time

[@engineeringoyster6243]

Notice how angry the deputy became when the law abiding citizen invokes his constitutional rights, even though the deputy took an oath to defend that Construction. In my experience, most cops hate law abiding citizens.

[@noneshere]

Just think of how bad US society got steamrolled before law enforcement was required to carry body cameras.

[@theangryquad3127]

He asked a simple question.

[@fortifarse]

@@theangryquad3127 he got a simple and legal response and then acted like an angry child.

[@tedunderhill9718]

Most cops seem to hate the Constitution as well, not to mention much of humanity.

[@Goulash45]

To be fair, we don’t know if the citizen in the video is law abiding. We have no reason to believe he is, or isn’t.

[@user-rf3cn2ou3x]

I've always said that I can keep you off my land, and you can keep me off your land, but I'm not worried about you, and I'm not the one you should be worried about. The people that I want to keep off my land, like atf, fbi, tax collectors, and police, are the ones that I can't do anything about .

[@SrDuhn]

I always see it as a red flag whenever a cop says "I'm recording too, by the way" passive-aggressively

[@josephhodges9819]

You think it is passive-aggressive to inform someone they are also being recorded which they must tell you anyways.

[@SrDuhn]

@@josephhodges9819 No, not at all. I think it is more about the _way_ they say it. Someone can say _"I'm recording too!"_ and convey a neutral _"It's OK that we both are recording and I'm glad that you know your rights",_ or they can convey an annoyed, passive-aggressive _"ummm... okay.... Did you know that I know how to record as well? So... I don't know why you feel like you have to record, but okay, whatever"._ A cop making such a big deal/appearing to be ever so slightly annoyed by your recording per se is never a good sign - it implies that they are insecure about people perceiving any fallibility in them; and this insecurity is a main ingredient to many cop's exaggerations, unnecessary escalations, lies, corruptions and brutality - which usually stem from a cop trying to cover up/justify a mistake in the beggining of an interaction.

[@drankydrank1]

@@SrDuhn Wow... Broken down perfectly, couldn't have explained it better. There's 0 benefit to even bringing it up, other than the childish sentiment of "oh yea, well me too" in a situation like this.

[@mattheusser1390]

it is assertive. Police are trained to take charge of situations - to maintain the power and control. Given what they do for a living, that seems reasonable. So if someone says something that would change the power dynamic, they need to shift it back. Thus all the comments we see on these videos like "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you", "I'm talking now", "You will (action)", and so on.

[@tylerj6327]

it’s a red flag when you pull someone over for a simple traffic stop and they pull out a phone and a bullshit blacks law dictionary and starts talking bout sovereign rights

[@simballa660]

When a cop trys to question you, first thing you say is,"i need a case number" no case number,=no case to investigate.=fishing expedition

[@stevenobrien557]

Lol, no

[@getmine9490]

Lmao that’s not how it works at all

[@simballa660]

It works every time.once you tell the cops you need a case number so you can refer the entire matter to your lawyer the cops back right off.know why?because they know the minute a lawyer gets involved everythings on the record,and they are going to have to explain their actions further on down the line.second,most of the time they are going onrumor,gossip or a hunch .and a judge wont issue an arrest warrant based on rumor,gossip or hunches.they want facts and evidence. If they have facts and evidence they arent going to bother to question you first,they are going to get a warrant and arrest you,then try to question you. If the cops ask you questions and you havent been arrested,they are hoping you will incriminate yourself,because they dont have enough to arrest you.have your lawyer get ahold of the cop and when the cop trys to tell your lawyer that he needs to question you but he doesnt have a a case number or a legitimate case that hes working on(all criminal cases are assigned a case number),your lawyer will laugh in his face cause hell know the cops are on a fishing expedition

[@stevenobrien557]

@@simballa660 lol, no.

[@BITCORN420]

@@simballa660 WELL SAID

[@Antmattroman]

"I'll leave when I'm done" "ight I'm getting the gun"

[@jdonvance]

That's just what I was thinking. And I'm hardly the kind of person who would solve a dispute with weapons.

[@luggy9256]

@Cole Walters thankfully video evidence of the person refusing to leave us good evidence in court if it came to that…

[@firehawk894]

Sounds like a great way for the cop to wait until your back is turned, shoot you and then claim you were threatening

[@EchoYoutube]

And your justified too.

[@dietrichpriebe9279]

@@jdonvance I'm pretty sure getting your gun out vs this cop would be bad.

[@bessie0899]

I like how insulted the cop is by people not blindly following orders

[@starburst23]

It's absurd how often police are looking for someone in THEIR jail. People die from this. It's the very most basic due diligence.

[@lizcollinson2692]

Especially with thier obsession with identification. Its like they want unrestricted access without the effective ability to use the information they collect ... to investigate.

[@DesignedbyHumans]

Just saw a video about a raid done on an apartment looking for someone who was serving a prison sentance for 20 years. It was on this week tonight a good show where they dig into alot of stuff

[@TheCastedone]

@@DesignedbyHumans they know what they're doing.

[@neilcampbell2222]

When a police officer "fails to identify" then I have "Reasonable Articulable Suspicion" that they are impersonating a police officer. Call the police for an armed man impersonating a police officer. Let them argue why you shouldn't have come to that conclusion.

[@markodukic6380]

Fake video

[@SuperSlacker69]

I like your thinking I've never thought of it that way. And considering what their policy response is in that situation I would find it rather humorous.

[@neilcampbell2222]

@@SuperSlacker69 Most complaints are a list of minor errors that collectively leave you unhappy. Managers are used to these and give a standard "sorry, we will try harder. Have a 50% off voucher" The secret is to identify the serious failure and the exact policy. Then state this action did this causing this, quoting the exact words. Send it to the best supervising organisation. It might not be their boss. For example a recent case had a father arrested and his son left with a shop assistant. That breaches child protection rules. Complain to child protection, not the police. This is child endangerment, are they endangering their own children?

[@mvngel818]

Genius

[@ZacharyPaulified]

Go ahead let me know how that goes!! Make, sure and record it, this will be entertaining!!

[@LordBillington42]

Cop: I don't get why this guy doesn't trust cops Also cop: I'll make sure I act in a way that reinforces this guys distrust in cops

[@santyclause8034]

The cop shouldn't have badgered the guy. No wonder he was asked to leave, the car in question wasn't this guys and he said as much. That's all that cop needed to know, and can verify as much, himself. If he's any kind of cop.

[@shinobi-no-bueno]

@@santyclause8034 "the registration didn't come back to him" "Did it come back to me?" "Idk who you are" "Then why are you on my property?"

[@ArtificialIyDeranged]

Probably cop: "Is there some way I can make all of this property into a civil asset forfeiture case, to really teach this guy a lesson?"

[@YeOldeTowneCryer]

I think it would have helped the officer understand why he was annoyed if he had clearly stated, "I don't appreciate you coming past a locked gate. There is a reason for that lock. In the future, call or leave a note in the mailbox." I understand the cop was trying to figure out what was with the abandoned vehicle. He needs to know if someone is sick or injured or disappeared. The vehicle is not registered to the "Eli" in jail so that raised concern. My carpool met in the parking lot of a chain restaurant and took turns driving the 30 miles to work. We noticed a vehicle covered with snow for two weeks and decided it was not someone on vacation who left car to catch the bus. We let cops know and sure enough it was stolen and abandoned. We later learned the thief caught a bus right there and disappeared in Chicago. But reviewing the video it becomes obvious the officer has an ego problem and seems to think he is the ultimate law around there. "I'll leave when I'm done", is a clear intent to ignore the wishes of the homeowner and reveals the officer does not understand the law that he is obligated to honor.

[@Zhuanghui]

"You're not under investigation" "So right now I'm investigating..." Yeahhhh... sure I'm not

[@TheHammerofDissidence]

Lmao, exactly

[@beepbop6542]

"Tails you lose, heads I win"

[@orlandorolon7338]

The person filming is not UNDER investigation, the cop is conducting an investigation and asking questions about the person they are looking for. THAT person is under investigation.

[@the_beat_thief]

@@orlandorolon7338 And the property owner said they would not speak to them and told the officer to leave multiple times. The officer's ass should have been off of the property after the first demand to leave.

[@robertthomasjones9278]

The cop asks why is this man not answering questions. After years of abuse by cops on ordinary citizens, people are just sick of cops.

[@tstemen1047]

I get a kick out out of how offended cops get when people aren’t cooperative. They only need to look into the past actions of law enforcement.

[@thevallancecrew4876]

I get a kick out of police when they get mad about citizens knowing their rights. Irritating!

[@tstemen1047]

@@shredder950 wow 4 months later. It took you that long to watch the video.

[@tstemen1047]

@@shredder950 by the way, what are you even talking about or do you know. What’s minors or pedophiles have to do with a cop trespassing. You’re a weird individual.

[@1014p]

@@shredder950can you not see the cop was fishing? All the information he needed was searchable in the department. Note individual was already arrested.

[@matrixkittens8225]

​@@shredder950bro you should play sports because that reach is crazy

[@matthewmayhem9213]

I recommend getting an intercom system for locked gates. That way, if it's bypassed and someone enters the property (breaking through or going around the locked gate), then it can be considered trespassing and dealt with appropriately.

[@Huntatroll]

what kind of intercom system

[@couldntmixapotnoodle]

Best thing I ever heard about police: Policeman talking in a public school: what is a police officers job? Some random at the back of the room: Arresting the wrong person!

[@Validboy]

Lol thats funny cuz its true..

[@packwolf445]

It's true

[@sitdowndogbreath]

Oh I forgot about that that was me as a kid I was from the Bronx I already hate cops

[@brichard9485]

I would have gone with beat up adults and steal their lunch money

[@steveg447]

Cop says Jesus, unbelievable yet he’s totally in the wrong. Yea, unbelievable.

[@AbstrACTioNation]

Sadly, it’s totally believable and typical

[@robertmacinnis6217]

If someone is on a property, it doesn't make them the owner. Hence the man in the trailer. The police officer should have confirmed he was the property owner. The man in the trailer could have asked him to leave also, again officer does not know who the property owner is. It's like me meeting the officer at the door and asking him to leave.

[@chrismello6178]

He was just trying to make sure people were safe and this guy being a bitch for no reason remember they human beings too

[@JassZoigel]

Your private propety right are too inconvenient for this law officer. It would be ironic if we all didn't already know it.

[@KSN2019]

@@JassZoigel wrong, the officer can be on the property. The only rights to “private property” is inside your home.

[@carlmuller8033]

The cop has "lingered". He is armed. He is armed and been told to leave. He has not, he is guilty of armed trespass. A felony.

[@Dowlphin]

I am wondering whether it would have been legal to tase the deputy at that point. Especially considering he was carrying a lethal weapon.

[@jeffreypierson2064]

@@Dowlphin This was Montana. I was worried that the homeowner was going to draw on the deputy. ATA would have an interesting discussion then about "Stand your ground" laws.

[@richardhunn9737]

A cop's job is defined by law. He's going against law means he's not a cop. He's impersonating a police officer, while engaged in armed trespass. If this were a reasonable and rational, therefore moral, society...

[@keepthechange2811]

@@richardhunn9737 Facts. But it's not. Not even close. Not even for show

[@nickhammer6408]

Let's see that happen. Never !

[@garudain77]

Federal officer: “Mister, this badge says I can go anywhere on your farm that I want to.” Farmer: “You don’t have my permission, but do what you’re gonna do. Please stay out of my barn.” (The fed walks into the pasture surrounding the barn, and into the barn. Soon he emerges at a run - a 2,000-lb bull chasing him.) Farmer: “Show him your badge!”

Step1: Don't talk to police That's it, there are no other steps

[@darriusdavis35]

It’s funny how such a complicated problem has such an easy solution.

[@NickolaiBeats]

So right. If he would have answered the cops questions in a different way, things may have escalated quickly.

@thatguy 00.... It becomes a lot easier when you don't answer the door to begin with, obviously that wasn't an option here though

[@DrEVeils]

Silence is a threat to officer's lies.

[@veramae4098]

The neighbor should NOT have talked to the police either, especially since the landowner told him NOT to. I would be having a firm conversation with a "neighbor" like that.

[@ethanschend6638]

When he walked away but we still have 6 mins on the clock

[@randyneves9701]

Somethings wrong I can feel it

[@jwatson15]

"Hello, 911. I have an armed trespasser on my property. He claims to be a police officer but he refuses to identify himself. I've asked him to leave my property but he's refusing to. Please send help. Im beginning to fear for my life."

[@Zanmiester]

yeah talk about escalating an annoying situation into a potentially deadly one

[@joshfps8546]

@@Zanmiester everyone is in danger by a cop like that

[@axeman098]

“”Do you have a warrant Officer?” “no...” “‘thank you, you can leave now...” “ I’ll leave when I’m done.” Me: “Unless you want to leave in an ambulance as an armed trespasser that refused to comply, I’d leave now...” bet me... I’ll be goddamned if you’re going to roll up on my property, bypass a locked gate with no warrant, and then cop an attitude with me for exercising my rights.... nope... he’d regret that mistake instantly...

[@l.j.r5100]

@@Zanmiester with refusal of name and badge number. The officer is the one escalating it into potentially dangerous situation. Also the officer should be arrested promptly if he did call. He very well is considered an armed suspect if disobeying the law.

[@l.j.r5100]

@NothingSweetAboutMe idk if its appropriate even though its lawful. No one can learn or betters themselves after death.

[@ellisdee2013]

I was working out at the family ranch one day when a game warden showed up. I looked up and happened to see him past a fence and walking through one of the fields. I yelled at him and told him to get out of the field and he got red in the face and started screaming at me. "YOU SEE THIS BADGE?! IT SAYS I CAN GO WHEREEVER I WANT!!!" I was like, "Okay!" and got back to work.. a few minutes later I hear him yelling, "HEEELLLLP!!!" while tearin ass across the field with our bull right behind him. I yelled back, "SHOW UM YOUR BADGE!!"

[@HysterS-FT]

That's great hahaha

[@randgrithr7387]

Old joke and you didn't even set it up proper, lame.

[@SpecterSeventy2]

“Your not under investigation.” ... but then immediately asks “what’s your relationship to Eli?” Lol

[@chronographer]

"You're not under investigation for anything" "I'm just doing an investigation. What's your name? Who is the car registered to? Who is Eli to you?" mmmmhmmmmmmmmmmmm

[@OmniscientWarrior]

Asking someone questions about another person doesn't mean that the person being asked questions is the subject of the investigation. The officer is trying to get info about Eli due to an abandoned vehicle. Further, if the guy was a relative, roommate, or any other person that has a close relation to Eli, the officer could take that info, then go ask Eli if he could verify the relation... then guess what... they can ask Eli if it would be alright if that person may remove the vehicle so it doesn't get impounded. But you are too busy wanting to be a dick to cops to actually learn what they do sometimes.

[@ViewThis.]

@@OmniscientWarrior Yes. I'm seeing what you're seeing.

[@thomassicard3733]

@@OmniscientWarrior You have no idea, at all, what may happen to you when you answer questions that a police officer has asked of you. Learn about the importance of remaining silent for your own protection, or... suffer the seriously negative consequences of being completely naive.

[@OmniscientWarrior]

@@thomassicard3733 Did you forget how to identify subjects from early grammar lessons? I know that we don't teach proper critical thinking in schools but that doesn't excuse much.

[@toothlessthedragon5100]

Imagine some random guy off the street breaks into your house and when you ask them to leave they have the audacity to say “When I’m done”

[@MrSpIrIt1507]

Imagine a protector of the law approaching your front door to check if an abandoned vehicle belongs to somebody and to see if anyone is possibly missing as that'd be a clue as to their last known whereabouts. Maybe that's your own missing child or even grandparent

[@gnarlyhogg]

@@MrSpIrIt1507 Cops can’t take it personally when people don’t act polite with them. The law isn’t a polite thing.

[@1USAUSA]

@@gnarlyhogg Exactly...

[@sincerelyjbLoverSuperior]

You have me laughing so hard at this comment.

[@justintyme4690]

Should be able To shoot. You don't know someones intensions with people acting like that.

[@Xterraforce]

If I had been the guy living in the camper when the cop said "I'll leave when I'm done" I believe I would have said "You're done" and closed the door.

[@roseburke3962]

There you go, enough said, right!

[@goldierule1350]

Same 100%

[@rickb.9067]

The old fork test...hmmm...YOU are done.

[@LOT9T]

lol

[@jesuschristislord77733]

Put on your "I don't answer questions" T-shirt

[@nevaste4108]

Only thing that makes me question the "trespassing" allegation, is that if the owner refuses to identify himself as the landowner, then how can the deputy know that he was asked to leave by the landowner? It seems to me that in order to provide clear communication, the landowner needs to establish himself as the landowner with the legal and legitimate authority to trespass another.

[@gregortheoverlander4122]

I think that is a reasonable take, but I think someone walking out the front door of a house, barring any other evidence to the contrary, is enough evidence that they are the owner of a house.

[@benk2755]

It doesn't matter what you think.

[@mrprodigy7143]

@@benk2755 it doesn’t matter what he thinks because he’s an American citizen

[@benk2755]

ok

[@wilfdarr]

“whose vehicle is it” “it's Eli's” “it's not registered to him” Mmmmk then, who's it registered to?

[@Galerak1]

If the cop knew it wasn't registered to Eli then he must have already had the name of the person it WAS registered to IMO

[@raezor6941]

@@Galerak1 If thats the case, then wtf is the cop doing on the property?

[@tracyseymour7553]

@@raezor6941 A fishing expedition

[@theeffectoflogic3]

whose*

[@Galerak1]

@@theeffectoflogic3 'Errorist attack 😉🤣

[@mrz1703]

"Get off my property..." "No..." "Hello 911, I have a police officer refusing to identify and trespassing...please send an officer to trespass this idiot please..."

[@eatmedrinkme9628]

And then 10 armed assholes show up and bully you for calling 911 on their buddy, probably arrest you for a false report or misusing 911. I'm sure they can figure something out.

[@jeffreypierson2064]

You need to ask for a supervisor...

[@KarmaTube5]

Send to trespass?

[@mrz1703]

@@KarmaTube5 its funny irony...sending a second officer to formally trespass the first dipshit officer...😉👍

[@neknadroj1]

No you have a armed unknown person trespassing on your property.

[@rickmcfeely9715]

There is absolutely no way a cop would go through that much trouble to “make sure they’re ok”. They don’t do that. He wanted to bust his friend for illegal parking or something.

[@gazzy9136]

They just go out their way to get some sort of ego boost by arresting someone for some meaningless reason

[@nothanks9503]

Police never help people that’s not their job they only ruin lives

[@waryviewer488]

@Rick McFeeley In Montana cops DO go to that much trouble to make sure folks are ok.

[@joewwilliams]

@@waryviewer488 gtfo. my mom doesn't even go through this much trouble to make sure I'm OK 😆

[@jennifer60515]

@@waryviewer488 No such thing. He was angry at the man for exercising his Constitutional rights. He was on a fishing expedition and he criminally trespassed to do it.