ICOM IC-705

[@bahathir_]

Hi. I have IC-7300 and most of the time, bing controlled by Raspberry Pi 3B+ . To save power, we can decrease LCD's brightness. The default is 50% is bright, but currently I set it to 10%.. Yes, 10% brightness is good enough for in-door or night operations. THen I set the screen blank as fast as possible, so it will turn off the LCD screen. Since I controlling the rig using Rpi, the LCD screen still off, until I touch any buttons/dials or VFO knob. Second suggestions, is to use earphones, IEMs or headphones which are using less power than the built-in speaker. It seem that the IC-705 has WiFi/WLAN feature, and we may able to remotely operate the rig wirelessly.. From what I found, IC-705 may be on sale (in Japan), on March 2020.. :) Looking forward your future video on IC-705. Thank you, Bahathir 9W2GNU, 73.

[@OH8STN]

Thank you for sharing your Ideas and perspective. I pinned your comment to help others find it and make use of the information. Thanks for the feedback and the tips. It's very much appreciated. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@rossbassette7518]

Julian, When this rig comes out, Your are definitely the go-to reviewer we will be waiting for. I just hope Icom sees fit to adding a built-in antenna tuner

[@HamRadioCrashCourse]

There is no tuner.

[@OH8STN]

Yeah the lack of an internal tuner is huge. The reason I'm still behind this rig is it does everything else so well.

[@HamRadioCrashCourse]

@@OH8STN we definately agree there. Almost all my portable ops antennas don't require a tuner at this point too. I'm pretty excited.

[@TJVergerII]

Ross Bassette can a ATU be added

[@mojostew]

Whats wrong with using a small manual antenna coupler? With only 10w PEP output, one could be made very compact and inexpensively. Regardless, this should be a huge success for ICOM and a great rig for those into field portable op's. Looking forward to your next video Julian. 73 De Stew, VK4SC

[@theoldhobbit3640]

This radio is estimated to hit the retail market at about £1000 and that is way out of my price range and to be fair I am more than happy with my 817 and 857D for portable use. I have built my system to work on solar and lightweight lipo batteries all of which can easily be carried, I have better things things to spend £1000 on. I only use resonant homebrew antennas so I have never used a tuner and can build one very quickly out of any little bit of wire. This really is a lovely looking radio and has stuff on the screen that some will find very useful, but my little 817 can get me to the USA, Europe and even Australia on 5w with some patience. Thank you so much for your review and as always is very well balanced and informative.

[@OH8STN]

Absolutely Fair comments and feedback. Thanks for sharing your perspective, it's very much appreciated. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@TalonsKrafts]

There is an iPad app available and a Mac app that can be used to remote control and use FT8 on the IC-705. This is one of the reasons I am seriously looking to get one of these radios in the new year. The points you raise in your video are very much why I am considering this rig.

[@ProbablyTooLoud]

Simply stated, I trust your reviews and I trust very little of what is said on the internet. I'm already elbows deep in Icom transceivers so this is easy, but brand loyalty only goes so far. Icom is however clearly leading the industry, but we are very fortunate to have so many increadible choices from so many manufacturers. Until the sun spot cycle improves propagation, weak signal work on digital modes with QRP only makes sense. Having a pan adapter/band scope built-in is now the defacto standard, but I still turn mine off and just listen. Remember, It's training as much as it is fun !

[@alexalonso2093]

well said. exactly...7 3

[@GeorgeLampere]

You gave a great review on the radio, so inspiring that I want to get one. I like that you always clarify your reviews by putting them into context. It makes it so much easier to evaluate. Nice job, keep up the good work.

[@WB8ERJ]

Thanks for reviewing the IC-705. Your pragmatism and refusal to regurgitate the manufacturer's marketing is quite refreshing and welcome! I agree with you, the IC-705 is a game changer.

[@ka8rma]

I understand the reasoning about having a external auto tuner but have found the elecraft t1 auto tuner perfect for using in the field and will use it to partner with the icom 705 when I get it

[@OH8STN]

You know that's an extremely good point. I totally forgot about the T1. Thanks for sharing that 👍

[@paularmstrong8458]

As always some great questions. As someone who is slowly getting back to the hobby, one of the things that I've found frustrating is the lack of a good field/portable radio that doesn't require a lot of add-ons.

[@bradleyjohnson452]

I will definetly be watching this radio. All band and all mode will be nice. I am hoping that it is less than the KX2/3 and that there will be a optional (small antenna tuner and matching amp for HF/VHF/UHF.

[@noth606]

Bradley Johnson considering the KX2/3 is more expensive than anything including the weight in gold I'm quite sure it will be less than those. However I'm almost equally sure there will be no tuner, optional or otherwise.

[@Lurker1979]

What amazes me about the FT-818 is how its not all that different from my 817. Even tho its considered a new radio. Icom feels modern. That is coming from someone like myself who prefers Yaesu. I also like that this radio is a SDR too.

[@thuff3207]

My current favorite radio is the kx2. But I agree with you having a builtin sound card is a must for any QRP radio. Too bad Elecraft did not take advantageous the kx2s architecture to have a sound card builtin. All the pieces for it are there. Bravo Icom. Thank you for this video it was worth watching.

[@joeframo3347]

Hello from Atlanta, Georgia. You did such a great presentation on the IC 105. I have the Yaesu Ft. 818 I am not happy with it. I don't know why Yaesu made another radio like this. But the Icom is ideal. Thank you for sharing this video. A big feather in your hat

[@OH8STN]

Thanks Joe. I have had the 817/818 since first released. I guess I just expected a lot more from Yaesu. I'm saving up my pennies for the 705, so I hope to bring it to the channel later this year. Thanks for the comment and the kindness, It's very much appreciated.

[@W9HJBill]

I love my Xiegu G90 with 20 watts (all the time) using a 12Ah LiFePO4 battery and a 10-80M HWEF antenna. Since the G90 has an antenna tuner, I don't have to worry about setting up the antenna (which is resonant) in "less than ideal" field conditions which will effect even a resonant antenna. Not having a tuner is the biggest "pass" in my eyes. Granted it's an external battery, but I can do 20 watts ALL the time for upwards of 6 hours (before I put my portable solar charger). And everything (including fishing line and sling shot and battery monitor, fits into a tiny go pack that is only 12" x 9.5" x 6". Also, with EVERYTHING, my go kit, including the G90 and battery, comes in at $810. I would be surprised if 705 comes in at less than $1000 just for the radio.

[@OH8STN]

Very valid points and extremely reasonable. As I've mentioned previously I passed on the g90 because there's no internal audio interface. So if you're doing digital most they're still going to be the cable mess. There's also that tiny little screen. On the flip side Playing devil's advocate, if I were operating CW or SSB, perhaps I wouldn't need the larger screen. But I really like manipulating those filters in real time. Anyway awesome comment great feedback thank you very much for sharing it with us. It's very much appreciated.

[@AdamWarrix]

I'm looking to get into SotA, which is essentially off-grid communication. This is a perfect radio since hiking with additional weight is cumbersome. This simplifies a lot, although I wish more radio, especially ones designed with portable field use in mind, contained antenna tuners. I understand it would increase power consumption and add some weight, but it would simply operation so much.

[@Robert-jt6eo]

Julian, as always you knocked the review out of the park. I have been looking at the IC-705 since early summer and yes most reviews are all the same, just rearranged in content. After 30 years of ham radio I am still learning. I plan on buying the IC-705 and running dipoles for the bands I am interested in there for NO TUNER NEEDED. As always Julian GREAT REVIEW , very informative. Keep up the Good Work. From Kansas, USA.

[@Gates54]

I have a deposit in for an IC-105, and my plan is to use it as a field radio. I have learned a lot from your site, and can't wait to see what you come up with for it!

[@OH8STN]

thanks. we will get there. frustrating to wait, but our time will come.

[@outbackeddie]

I love the portability factor. This would be a great rig to have in my RV. Thanks for your comments and perspective.

[@hhampton]

Strongly considering one depending on the price point. I currently don't have any HF gear and am just getting back into ham radio after several years of inactivity. Most, if not all, of my operating will be portable and this looks it will check almost all the boxes. I would not mind using a separate tuner but I hope Icom comes up with a dedicated accessory tuner either internal or as an attached external module.

[@mdouble100]

Your evaluation of this new rig is, I feel, entirely appropriate it's upside potential. I think ICOM is now the leader in the field of QRP rigs. I entirely agree that the emergence of digital QRP is one reason why this radio has included features which clearly support this kind of operation. Likewise, the ability to charge from a USB port seems like the ICOM folks have been watching your channel and noted your innovations and creative solutions. They've taken all that in and made it a part of their new design.

[@OH8STN]

I don't know how to respond to your comment. If it's even a little bit true I'm grateful. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@ChipLohman]

Some compliments and a "Bravo Zulu" for your content. As a retired Marine, I appreciate your fieldcraft skills. As a retired journalist, I respect your articulate, well-researched reports. If I were another blogger and saw your work, I might simply refer people to you rather than settle for second place! 73, Chip/NN4U

[@keithgordonk7ksg673]

Bravo, Julian! The 705 has the trifecta: A readable screen, USB charging and elimination of the rat's nest of interface wires. Add the Elecraft T1 tuner, solar panels and battery that we're probably carrying already and it's my next radio. (Maybe someone will develop at 1500 w linear amplifier the size of a deck of cards in the next year and we'll all be happy.) Thanks, always, for your excellent videos.

[@keithkb7zpb688]

Awesome look at the new Icom radio. I have the IC 706 MKII not really a great backpacking radio. I do use phone and mainly qrp 10 w or less. The new IC 705 is the one QRP radio I would really like for backpacking and ham radio. Thanks for your information and incite on the radio de kb7zpb

[@francismangiapesci9686]

While I understand the lack of a built -in antenna tuner, the question of how large can (or should) this radio be(come) comes to mind as well. Also, DC current draw would increase somewhat with an internal tuner, as would the cost of R&D and the eventual sale price. If I wanted to carry an IC-7300 around for portable use, it would have the tuner and more power output, but would suck down a battery in fairly short order. I have considered a KX3, but that is now a long distance down my list. I owned the FT-817ND a few years ago, but even the "818" would need many options to even approach what the IC-705 should be able to do. I am optimistic this early introduction is more of a "trial balloon", and that hardware, firmware, and software changes will be made before this radio reaches the market, as it should be. ICOM has numerous active hams doing the R&D, and we may well be a source of suggestions and ideas for the finished product.

[@OH8STN]

Amazing comment and perspective. Thanks for sharing oh, it's very much appreciated.

[@CWB-RF]

This is a pretty cool looking rig but I'm a less is more kind of guy. Unless it comes in at a great price that I can't resist (it probably won't) I'm not the target market for this one. It just feels like it's an appliance that won't challenge me to hone my craft which is part of the fun for myself. I'm still baffled by the battery pack choice but going with external power is quite common for many who love QRP operations. I hope it does drive down the FT-818 used market so I can pickup backup radios for short money and be quite happy. Cheers!

[@OH8STN]

Yep, each of us has our own vision of the "perfect" qrp field radio. I remember nearly two decades ago, after purchasing my first 817. One of my closest friends referred to it as, "an appliance". The funny thing is that same guy, still one of my closest friends, criticized me about this video and this rig (all in good fun). Once again choosing the word "Appliance", to describe the 705. He's also very happy with the 817 these days. Anyway, thanks for the comment. Differing perspectives and opinions is what makes discussions like these, so interesting. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@CWB-RF]

OH8STN Yes indeed, I’m sure I couldn’t even afford my perfect radio if I was left to design one myself lol. If Icom hits the right price point like they did with the 7300 I may become an appliance operator myself. Compared to what hams had to do 50-60 years ago most of of are in that category.

[@Okimyhome]

Just found your channel and I’m loving it. I subscribed.👍. I know nothing of ham radio but I’ve always been interested. I’ve started binge watching with enthusiasm. 😎. Thank you for sharing your knowledge👏

[@larserikhinrichsen1511]

Nice video Julian. I have two sugestions for the new IC 705 rig...(things I would like the radio had...) 1. the power-plug should have been a bajonet-stile plug, so it will be more secure. 2. the missing atu is a big minus... hope they will make an attachment unit that can be assambled on the back. Also Icom should make more software outlines, so you can change the screen into different looking outline. One software could be for specific channel use, without waterfall, (for phone com/emcom). and other futures could be lined up in a selection of different software outlines.(make your own screen on your radio - type of...) A handle-set on the side would be nice, and I wonder if Icom would make a 50-100w amp to the model ? I will be looking forward to this item in my collection.. rgds fm oz1fjb - ou2v

[@davidpearson2581]

I currently use a Flex 1500 with a Surface tablet for my go kit. I love the ideal of having UHF/VHF all in one radio. I am also interested in moving to the Raspberry Pi for lower power requirements. I think if Flex wants to stay in the QRP game then need to come out with something quickly. I have no issue with having no built in tuner. My current station has no built in tuners, I use external or resonant antennas. Icon has a winner if the product delivers as advertised.

[@kd2kub]

Julian, Thanks for posting this introduction to this new and pre-release rig, Although it is not out yet, I can say your assessment resonates with mine. I would like to add that I'm not that impressed with ICOM at this point with their screen interfaces given that several 7610's are having screen issues. Also completely different platform such as this just begs issues if they have not been thoroughly field tested before release. I really hope that issues don't plague this rig. I think for the market, this new concept is a much needed push in the direction of SDR and smaller component designs. It would not be possible without technology advancements to make that happen. I am glad to see that ICOM is doing that and attempting to be a new front runner in Field Ops type gear. I will give Elecraft and Yeasu for starting that market. Keep on posting great content.

[@OH8STN]

Well said, and very much appreciated. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@hardlifeofapo]

If I have to find an issue with it, it would be the lack of an internal tuner. Specially because the kx2 comes with a really useful one, and both radios roughly have the same size. I know that we can use a linked dipole as an antenna, but it would be a very nice feature to have.

[@OH8STN]

I agree with you. For me, the radio just ticks so many of the other boxes, I needed to figure out a way to work with the rig, without a tuner. Still, you are right. A tuner would be nice. Thanks for the comment and perspective. It's very much appreciated.

[@willgilliam9053]

OH8STN - You described exactly what I want to with amateur radio. Narrowband digital QRP looks like great stuff. I would love to have a radio like this as my first rig. If they want to save on weight and cost, they can toss the display, give me an IQ data stream over the USB port, I'll run a spectrum viewing program on the pi I'll have with me.

[@JeffHochberg]

It’s the radio you’ve been asking for - back when you spoke of adding SBCs to radio and we need to make the manufacturers listen to us. The downfalls I found with the 705 are: 1. Low power - I’m not savvy enough for QRP 2. No built in tuner 3. No full duplex - would make it phenomenal for satellite work 4. Single VFO You’re absolutely correct though...it will make for a phenomenal radio for digital work.

[@JeffHochberg]

It will be interesting to see if they provide hotspot capabilities with the built in WiFi support. That would be HOT😅

[@OH8STN]

@@JeffHochberg well you actually remember that post with the single board computers? We've come a long way since then huh?

[@JeffHochberg]

OH8STN absolutely! As I told you on FB, you’re my favorite on KZbin so I follow your videos very closely.

[@SleeplessCDN]

Let me add something to your list. 5. micro-USB port instead of using USB-C - The design flaw of micro-USB cables using "fangs" will cause people to have to buy USB cables again and again when those "fangs" retract into the housing, the only solution will be to throw them out and buy new ones until they do the same once again.

[@TXLorenzo]

Julian, I agree with you on the attractiveness of this radio. The only drawback I see, will be the price and the fact it can only produce 10 watts. I would love to see a real world field comparison between the IC 705 and the Xiegu G90 with its internal antenna tuner and 20 watt power output. If the IC 705 could produce at least 20 watts, I would not hesitate to buy this radio. It would be a great companion for my IC 7300. I do agree that the all in one USB CAT/PTT and audio feature will surely clean up the wire mess.

[@OH8STN]

The G90 is really the first Chinese radio I would take seriously. The others I've had really poor support, firmware problems, and getting warranties an entire mission in itself. But that g90 looks pretty cool. I considered the g90 more of Gateway rig, between qrp and qro. To be fair, it's definitely one of the options. Awesome comment and perspective. It's very much appreciated.

[@TXLorenzo]

@@OH8STN I have had similar bad luck with other Chinese radios. Xiegu seems to be more of a responsive company than the others. So far, the G90 has proven itself on numerous trips to the field and other travel trips throughout Europe. I continously get solid reports from all over the continent. It has an all metal body and has taken some real abuse. For the price point, it is had to beat.

[@AmishSpecialForces]

Julian, if I was to buy I've of these I'd also get the Elecraft T1 tuner. It's very lightweight and tunes very well. It would be a great companion for this radio for times when a resonant antenna isn't feasible.

[@OH8STN]

Yeah that's a good point. Lots of people have mentioned that the elecraft T1 tuner and it is small and functional. I admit I forgot about that one.

[@AmishSpecialForces]

I think it'll make a great companion to the 705, for those times when you have to put up a quick antenna that is most likely not going to be resonant. And, that's what we're here for, to keep you on your toes and your thinking cap on!

[@NexxuSix]

OHSTN: Nice review, and honest opinion about the radio. An internal tuner would be nice, but there are other options as you have mentioned. I agree that manufactures need to start listening more to the Operators who take these rigs to the field. IP65 or better ratings, ruggedness, and simplicity in interfacing are key to their success for the civilian market.

[@willian.direction6740]

I like the single interfacing cable idea like my ic 7200. Faffing about with interfaces and stuff hooked into my 817 out in the field becomes old school for serious portable work. Look forward to the review very much.

[@SamuraiShippo]

I am waiting for this radio myself. I was going to do a KX3 but seeing this blew me out of the water. I am defiantly saving my pennies for this one

[@texasfrontiersman8245]

The Icom 705 battery form factor is horrific. I couldn't help but chuckle when you said you were going to buy/carry four batteries plus the battery box! LOL! Yaesu had the right idea with the FT-897 dual battery compartment run one while you charge the other plus 20 watts output! They didn't have the battery technology we do today but you have to admit is was a genius design in its day. Love the channel only time will tell on the Icom 705.

[@brianfrommaumee]

Oh, I think the after market will be right along with some high capacity snap-in battery packs. It's all but inevitable.

[@jackh7356]

Julian, great video from a practical point of view. Looking forward to your eventual hands-on review of the 705. Looks like a great radio...I plan to get one. Like you I too use resonant antennas so no-tuner is a non-issue for me. 73!

[@edwinpd0sot503]

Although I totally agree on the points you mentioned, the only spec that I dearly miss is the non dStar (analoge) Aprs option (maybe not mentioned yet possibly available) because of the portable ops. Good review and story/video! 73

[@simonforget280]

I've been looking at Icom recent offering. Most repeaters in my area are D-Star compatible so it would nicely fit. Keep up your excellent work!

[@K7AGE]

It will be interesting to learn what the duty cycle is of this radio and how well it dispates heat. I am looking forward to the QRP LAB QSX rig for digital.

[@OH8STN]

Agreed. We've seen excellent engineering from Icom previously. I'm hoping that engineering expertise hasn't changed About the QSX. I've lost all hope in the QSX ever being released. After three years of promises, it still seems no closer. This places doubts on the ability of that small company to support the rig once/if released.

[@fbriansmith]

In my mind their is no question the internal audio codec and the USB CAT control are the most important features of the IC-705 for portable field operations. I am going on a trip this weekend for a family member’s wedding. I am thinking about taking my FT-817 and 20m resonant antenna to keep the amount of gear low and simplicity of operation. However, the above set-up limits me to voice only on 20m only. If I want to add any digital mode I have to also carry the SignaLink and multiple cables. I have the luxury of a suitcase to carry it all and a guest house to operate in, yet I am still looking at just going with voice only on 20m to keep it simple. Internal audio codec means I can operate several different digital modes if SSB is flat. All I have to add is the one USB cable for the computer I am already taking.

[@OH8STN]

I think you understand the problem perfectly. After adding the filters, operating Voice or CW with the eight one eight is ok. Operating FT4, FT8, JS8, ... it gets clumsy and complicated. Thanks for your comment.

[@K6UDA]

Julian, Your spot on. I've been curious and excited about this radio since I heard about it at Tokyo. I hadn't seen to port setup until this video and seeing the ALC port opens this up to use with all types of amps. On board Codec is going to make digital operations a breeze.

[@OH8STN]

Yeah my only concern at the moment is the price. Of course there's things like ruggedness and the screen. But it's like years ahead of anything Yaesu has put out for portable Ops. Thanks for the comment

[@FactualTruth]

I waited for your opinion on this rig and agree 100%. Thank you Julian. 73

[@raymondaddington4882]

Great video and perspective, thank you! Can't wait to see this one in person, on the wait list...

[@OH8STN]

Thanks for that. It may not be perfect but it's so far ahead of what we have on the market right now, I'm willing to jump in headfirst, to see what it's all about. Thanks for the comment, I'm also on the waitlist.

[@mattcero1]

Great video guy. Man oh man,,,if this had an internal antenna tuner, nothing in the QRP world would beat it.

[@jimthvac100]

More I think about it you have a good point on not wanting to rely on an antenna tuner. Since this radio would be only using 5 to 10 watts a resonant antenna will be very important on getting that signal as far as it can go.

[@forthy62]

Interesting thoughts and good video Julian! In my opinion it is a qrp but not a portable field radio. Whats lacking is some kind of robustness. The display might get damaged in the field very easily. I wonder how readable it is in the sunlight. The radio is not waterproof nor is it dustproof (in fact none of the mentioned KX2/3 and FT-817/818 are). No internal atu is a big disadvantage. A good resonant antenna is great, but there might be shtf situations where you only have 20m of wire....Better to have a tuner and don't need it then needing one and having none :-) The battery concept is really great indeed! If we focus on HF bands, the KX2 is still the better radio, internal ATU, internal battery, display readable even in direct sunlight, very lightweight. But a mess with cables for digital modes and not robust at all. I used my FT-817ND for nearly a decade now operating portable, no tuner, battery is a joke, but still a good radio. I retiered it when I got my KX2. Maybe Elecraft will bring out a KX4... :-) But I am sure I am going to give the IC-705 a try anyway as soon as it is available :-) 73, Stephan, DF6PA

[@robertbrown3413]

Resonant antennas are no problem. I hope this does not include a tuner. We only have the preliminary spec on this radio yet. It's rather chunky compared to the KX3 but does a lot more.

[@pancognetic]

Great job on the video with IC-705 thoughts. Portable, remote, and renewable energy-on-the-fly is one of my fav niche areas of operation... in the field!!

[@OH8STN]

Thanks for that. It's fun and actually incredibly useful. Any operators don't understand the "Renewable Power" thing, but hopefully operators like us will help him get there

[@johnpawlicki1184]

I do not see 2 hours operation on the battery pack. The pack is 7.4V not 12V. 1880 mAh represents 13.9 Watthours. The manual says that that the IC7300 on standby current is 0.9A at 13.8V which is 12.2 Watts. That is if we only receive. I figure that there will be some receive current draw improvements since the IC7300 was released but we have more bands and it would be nice to transmit once in a while. In any event this will probably be a great radio. Game changer Yaesu.

[@4X4-RADIO]

For me the main features missing, maybe in a future Plus version. > 2nd BNC antenna socket, for HF on BNC 1 and VHF on BNC 2 > Built in Tuner > LiFePO4 Battery pack. > Should have USB-C, more robust than micro Some extras for a killer radio A built in TNC for Packet / APRS Bluetooth for Headset/Mic

[@OH8STN]

Well said Dave

[@4X4-RADIO]

@@OH8STN My understanding is the versions shown are "Alpha" so who knows... Maybe they may surprise us in "Production" version. :) :)

[@billsbullets]

I love the refreshing perspective you have on amateur radio. Keep up the excellent work and thank you for sharing. K9PAL

[@OH8STN]

Thank you for that. It's not always easy to stay positive but I love what we're trying to do here 👍 73 Julian oh8stn

[@chuck4050]

A sound card is nice I don't do much digital so not important to me really and I have capabilities anyway but if the ic-705 doesn't come with a built in tuner Icom missed on a new radio with radios like KX2, KX3 and the many Chinese radios that offer this already and if they come out with a 3:1 tuner miss again when the Elecraft's can tune just about anything I think 10:1?(not that that always works lol). It is nice to see Icom finally get into this market again and this will probably get Yaesu and Kenwood to come out with some new radios based on SDR format. I also think with the bands the way they are a 25 watt radio would be nice. Thanks for the info.

[@steinshaw2490]

Thanks for the review Julian, I bought my ic-7100 because it is single usb and I knew I will be doing digital. This looks like a nice little radio. It will be interesting to see how the end product ends up. I’m one that questions the efficiency of the color screen.

[@RadioPrepper]

Hello. It certainly looks great and the features are top notch. I am still waiting for the specs though, you know my pet peeve about current draw ;-) ... I am also torn between having a large vulnerable screen versus being able to see a whole band at once, which is great. Icom is quality, no doubt. We'll see... I am certainly curious... Good points and a great video as always :-)

[@OH8STN]

You know buddy, I'm really going to enjoy arguing with you on this topic 😀👍👍👍 To be fair, I don't see a reason for operator who is primarily working CW, to buy this radio, if they already have something like the kx1. If CW were my primary mode, I think I would stick with the KX1. For the operator working below the noise floor, this is a magnificent rig. The display and user interface, instant qsy, wrapping those filters tightly around that -23 SNR signal. That my friend, that's what it's all about. 😊 I've already started saving up my tokens. Let's see in the spring, maybe I'll come down there and visit you so we can compare the kx2 to the 705 Head to head for kicks and giggles.

[@SleeplessCDN]

@@OH8STN Julian, I hope you will make a video out of that comparison because I have a feeling several others will wanna see that as well, I have heard complaints online that people won't be able to do satellites or the ISS as the IC-705 won't have full duplex, I haven't done any satellites as of yet with my ft-857D so it is a subject which I am not familiar with to be honest. My main gripe might seem small and petty but it is something that truly annoys me, it is the inclusion of a micro-USB port instead of a USB-C port, both my cellphone and my Tablet has a micro-USB and I now have 5 micro-USB cables which are now garbage, the "fangs" on the bottom of the connector which holds it in place has completely retracted so now my cables refuse to charge either of my devices and as soon as I plug them in they fall out and drop to the floor as the "fangs" that are supposed to hold onto the device are now completely retracted, the bottom of the connector is totally flat and it is impossible to pull them out once again so all I can do with these cables are to just chuck them into the garbage which is what I am sure I am gonna have to do with the USB cable for the IC-705, this wouldn't be a problem though if they had thought ahead and built a USB-C port instead of the micro-USB port. What are your thoughts on the subject of the Full Duplex complaint regarding satellite transmissions and also on the issue of using the faulty micro-USB design in the IC-705?? Thanks in Advance, 73 de VE3DKK

[@OH8STN]

Well I don't know if there's full-duplex on VHF UHF or not yet. Neither does anybody else. I hope there is, but if there's not, it wouldn't be a deal-breaker. Since VHF and UHF portion is based on the 9700, it is my hope, nothing more. I know operators who like to use dual ft-817/857 rigs for sats. I think that's a working hack designed to allow operators a cheap way of working transponder satellites with gear they already have. It is portable however. For satellites I prefer using purpose-built gear. My sat rigs are a Kenwood D7, Icom 910h, and Kenwood D700, all of which were purpose-built for full duplex Communications with satellites. The 910h is also well suited for transponders as an all mode rig. Anyway working satellites isn't why I want this rig. Narrow bandwidth data modes on HF is why I want it, and practically what it's been designed for. If a SAT guy is telling me that his niche of a niche of a niche portion of this Hobby, is the reason he doesn't like an otherwise magnificent radio, I would wonder why he isn't considering the 9700. It's much more practical using purpose-built gear full duplex rigs for satellites like I do. I think there's a difference between the way I look at this radio, and others simply trying to find ridiculously silly things to complain about it. I'm looking at the Innovative features this radio has as an QRP HF rig. I'm comparing it 1/1 with the ft-818 as QRP HF rigs. If I wanted to do satcoms, I would not be considering an HF rig with add-on VHF/UHF. I'd buy a 9700 which I'm planning on anyway. As for the USB cable. It's about as annoying as my neighbors playing disco music late on a Friday night.

[@mghunn]

Great review! I'm disappointed by the lack of a tuner, and I will miss a second antenna port, but I really want one of these.

[@joewilson2258]

A two port antenna switch can be used to switch antennas . Just mark the switch for either antenna . As for a tuner ldg makes a great qrp tuner that is in a small package .

[@mghunn]

@@joewilson2258 As can a diplexer which, not needing manipulation, would be a more elegant solution, but the whole point is to carry less gear with fewer cables and connections to fail.

[@AntGuru]

Great pre-review Julian , look forward to your field test of this new rig as i currently use a IC7300 for base and some field day but have a Yaesu FT857D as a light weight portable.

[@WA9NNN]

Very nice presentation. It would be very neat for Icom or a 3rd party to make an accessory that would fasten onto the back with an auto tuner, 12 volt battery and perhaps a small amplifier. So when you need maximum portability use it bare; but when an additional pound or so isn’t an issue you’ve easily got more capability. I suspect there’ll be a whole industry of accessories built around this. How about a package with raspberry pi, small display, power and tuner. It’s going to be an exciting time. After our every Saturday breakfast, my club The 220Mhz Guys, usually head off to the woods to do a mini field day. A nice compact package built around the IC-705 would be super. WA9NNN, Dick

[@emailshafihusain]

I heard about IC 705 but didn't know much. I think today, if one needs QRP rig then it should be IC 705. One down side cane be size in comparison but I am assuming that wouldn't be much of a concern practically speaking.

[@Cris2Lin]

Julian, as always excellent and value added video: I do agree with you. That is the radio that Yaesu should have design. For me personally that enjoy QRP and also a non Morse code (not a hater, just prefer voice and digital mode) this radio is what I hope to own (at a respectable price) for my back pack and also when I need to operate in less then ideal places. I hope other manufacturers are listening and taking note. It is no longer good enough to give the Ham community radios you feel we should have. Teasing us with revision that only that those feature should have been there from the start. Give us the radio we want and we will pay a fair price for it. This one has my attention. Thank you Julian

[@stevemcnaughton-kb3jc96]

Nice video Julian, I do look to you for ideas and direction. I have a 7300, which I love, for the touch screen, the waterfall, built in filters, rig control/sound card, etc. The 705 would be a logical step for me.The USB charging is a great feature, like you, I could leave the charge controller at home. I think the small Elecraft tuner (T1 ATU) would be a good companion. I see in the Icom highlights from the Tokyo radio show, that they have a small back pack like carrier for the radio. One thing I do have on my 7300 is the Portable Zero escort rails to protect the dials and rotary encoder, I wonder it something like that can be created for the 705? There didn't seem to be too much side to the radio!

[@johnpawlicki1184]

I am lazy and hate tuning an antenna. I plan on using the Elecraft T1 auto tuner and my normal antenna setup. 5V charging stations are becoming available everywhere. No sound card needed. I will probably just get a bigger case for my laptop and throw it in as a laptop "accessory" like a mouse or USB hub.

[@jimthvac100]

Thinking a small manual ATU would be lightweight enough if needed. I would not want to spend extra money on a bunch of little 2ah batteries for this. Instead rather use an external LiFePO4 battery pack like you made then I would be able to use the full 10 watts. With all the light weight high watt hour battery options available this day and age including solar panels for field use I could care less about this thing using more power for the screen. Even the 891 with a full 100 watts is easy to use in the field with a homemade LiFePO4 battery. So I don't think we need to be too worried about power use like we did 20 years ago. The nice big bright usable display would be well worth it to me. Now I need to find the best QRP manual ATU to use with this. I seen many out there not sure which is best and most easy to use, your thoughts?

[@OH8STN]

Totally agreed. I've got a video incoming about powering these types of radios eg Icom ic-705, the xiegu g90, mchf, x5105, 818, kx2, ... Most people concerned about the high amperage draw of modern Riggs, probably have little experience with lithium or lithium iron phosphate batteries. They're basing the opinions on lead acid experience. You're going to love the new portable power options incoming all the channel. Personally I think I'm going to stick with resonant antennas for these low-power rigs. There are a couple of good Ultra small tuners from elecraft and sotabeams, for those who want them. Awesome comment and great discussion. Thanks for watching and commenting 👍👍👍

[@francismcclaughry3794]

I have the Icom 706 and love it. on this new one I don't care for the BNC plug for the antenna, but I could live with it.

[@OH8STN]

That's a good point. It's definitely not perfect but it's a hell of a lot better than other radios being released the past couple of years. Thanks for the perspective and the common it's very much appreciated.

[@mdouble100]

looks like a winner to me. The single wire data connection is brilliant. In this age of digital communications it makes a lot of sense.

[@OH8STN]

Thanks Marvin, I hope that's the case. We shall see with the next gen of portable radios 👍👍👍

[@ericday2072]

I'd be interested in how you rate this radio's ruggedness as a Go Kit radio.

[@OH8STN]

That's a good point. The truth is, we don't know yet. This is a critical question for me as you know, up here at 65°N. I'm certain it is not as delicate as the elecraft radios. I'm hoping it's as tough as the eight one eight. That's just an item on a wish list though, we shall see.

[@amsoiltek]

@@OH8STN Has Ray Novack not reached out to you yet on this radio? You would be the perfect beta tester for ICOM!

[@anonymous4831]

Hi Julian Concur with your thoughts. Has there been any comment about the Bluetooth implementation ie. Is it for audio/mic only, or have they incorporated keyboard/mouse input for data entry for rtty/psk. Doesn't look to be a lot of cooling capacity given a pa running at up to 10w, hope frequency drift isn't a problem especially for data modes. Would also like to see it ruggedised more. I guess it'll fine on the coffee table but not sure in the field. A few suggestions; powerpoles, usb-c, grab handles, the vfo looks a little low if on a desk for comfortable use given there's no bail stand. Keen to see the dc consumption specs and if the software will provide power saving modes as per mobile phones/tablets. Glen G0SBN

[@grantmcduling9760]

A nice perspective for the review. Refreshing. I wonder what the radio will cost.

[@OH8STN]

That's the million-dollar question. I'm going to be really bummed if it's over a thousand bucks.

[@grantmcduling9760]

@@OH8STN I will be booking one on a no obligation basis and take it from there. I will watch your review once more. Perhaps this rig will be the new benchmark.

[@pcwgr]

It looks like a potentially great radio. I love the screen (I own an Icom 7300) but my concern is the durability of such a screen out it the field. My FT818 is a tank

[@OH8STN]

Most of us have the same concerns. Lets wait and see.

[@VA3OSO]

If this is like the IC-7300 then it will be very fun and productive to use. I'm sure this model will sell very well I'm guessing a similar power consumption to the IC-7300 though, which is listed as 1 amp draw on receive, but I've measured mine at 700mah. This may be a deal-breaker for some operators....

[@drnv150]

The IC-7300 is only HF, but has 100 watt, the IC-705 has VHF/UHF & Dstar. I use an IC-7100 for portable, I like the IC-7300 for HF, if I get a qrp rig, so far the IC-705 looks interesting, for the backpack.

[@ok4rm]

This compact radio offers a lot of things I miss in KX-3. Maybe the KX-3 display is not so bad, but portable operating digital with KX-3 requires either high level of proficiency in high speed keying (with paddles) or an uncomfy bunch of additional boxes and cables. Internal battery - I threw internal AA cell holders from inside the KX-3 long, long time ago. NiMH was too heavy and I miss an option to "upgrade" to LiPol cells (not AA, obviously, but something much more space-efficient). Direct USB connection, dismissed by Elecraft designers as "generating too much noise"... I just hope the new IC-705 will come out cheaper than was KX-3 with all their bells and whistles.

[@Gengar38]

Sir, I really enjoyed your video about the ICom 705 radio. Thank you for making it. 🙂

[@linkinmorfeus6019]

It was interesting to learn the differences between the receiving parts (RX) of the new 705 and the old IC-7300, IC-R8600. If there are differences, what are they?? All these nuances for frequencies below 30 MHz. Has reception improved in the long wave range (130-300 kHz)??

[@Devin82m]

Yep, I fully agree. Not to mention the menu system will be far more intuitive, as all Icoms are, compared to Yaesu which are always clunky and confusing.

[@tprice2012]

I guesstimate in the base configuration you'll be saving 2+ pounds in audio interface, cables, storage batteries, charge controllers etc. I'm very excited to see where this goes. If nothing else you get a better digital interface and much simplified power distribution strategy!

[@OH8STN]

Agreed Tim. I can't wait to get rid of all of the cable mess and audio interface.

[@radiowavz]

Nice review. I do appreciate your pragmatic approach.

[@AP268]

I paid my deposit within hours of release. I think these radios are going to be fantastic for field deploying with my Air Cadets so wanted to get in early to acquire one for testing. I too have started ordering battery packs from ML&S which i can use with my ID-51 too, which is a great bonus. Now just to add a couple of DX Commanders (particularly interested in Cal's new 18m one in development) and to upgrade a couple of my Chameleon options. Please keep the videos coming, it's a very exciting time! de James M0RUT/GB0AC

[@bbillp]

Thanks for the IC705 review, it should be very popular. How about a performance review ? I’m a CW and digital operator and have operated from the local hills and from Trips to Europe. IMHO the Elecraft KX-1 (and others of similar size) are easy traveling radios while the KX-3 seems vulnerable to damage although I’ve not had any problems. the Yaesu FT817/818 are easy traveling radios as well because they are in a flat box, its easy to protect the front panel and easy to stash in my back pack however the Yaesu is heavy and typically I don’t carry batteries on the airplanes so that saves TSA hassle and weight. I would be impressed with LESS cables and after experiencing SDR performance I would be interested in a 705 to replace my other recently portable radios. One last comment, HF Hill topping seems so much fun with a Simple 2 knob rig, are those days gone now ?

[@OH8STN]

Thanks for the comments. For my brief time operating CW in this hobby, a lightweight 2/3 band qrp kit radio or something like a KX1, would have been beautiful. There is nothing lighter or more compact than a CW only rig. Unfortunately that's also the downside. It's lightweight and easy to carry, but only does CW. As I alluded to in the video, it depends very much on the Operators unique operating style, and operating goals. The KX3 is extremely delicate however, its user interface is absolutely magnificent. The 817/818 is definitely flat and easy to pack. When operating any other mode than CW, all the supporting equipment to go along with the 817/818 makes it a moot point. In fact, this is one of the points of the video. We are not only operating CW anymore. With the horrific propagation we experience on a daily level these days, it's not uncommon to work signals at or below the noise floor. Then only if you can pull that signal in. So having the filters and/or DSP to pull those signals out of the noise, is critical. We can't work a station we can't hear, or with modern rigs see This is why rigs such as the KX2, KX3, mcHF, Xiegu x5105, FT-891, IC-7300, exist. They allow the operator to focus on that very weak signal, down in the noise. To answer your question. There will always be those operators focused on nostalgia and tradition. In contrast there all those operators who enjoy FT contesting, or data nets over HF. None of them are any more or less important than the others. With rigs like the 705, we have the choice to do it all. Thanks for taking the time to write your comments and feedback. It's very much appreciated. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@davidm1635]

Julian, an excellent review of a rig you don't even have your hands on yet. Thanks for not reading a spec manual in your review. 73, kk4zuu

[@AndyWragg]

Great update Julian. It's a little, beyond my reach for now, unless I win the lottery. But the feature set is going to be head and shoulders above anything else out there so I'm hoping I can pick one up 2and hand from one of the early birds that just has to have that shiny new box, only to find they don't like it. Something tells me though that the 705 is going to be a keeper, and the used market will be small for a long time. Stay safe buddy 73 G1AW

[@OH8STN]

Well said Andy. I'm trying not to allow my passion for the feature set to affect my judgment. That said, I agree with you.

[@scottka7fvv]

Great video. I will be anxously waiting its release. I have been frustrated with QRP in the pasr previously owning a IC-703 and a FT-817. I did have favorable reports during a Field Day with the IC-703 butnwith a full size 80 mtr dipole. I am an avidmsatellite operator and would like to see the reviews on this radio by satellite operators when it comes out. KA7FVV

[@Susieandchris]

Thanks .... just wish it had a tuner then would be perfect

[@OH8STN]

Me too. I really like Broadband antennas, and tuning up anything.

[@wolfholler9939]

Maybe the Elecraft T1 ATU (max 20W and HF - 6m) as a very small piece of equipment can be attached to the back of the IC-705. 73 de OE7FTJ

[@rnrbishop]

@@wolfholler9939 if elecraft and xiegu can fit them in the same footprint, why cant the japanese?

[@SamuraiShippo]

That oddly is not a deal breaker for me. My main portable antenna is easy to tune and I really don't like radios with built in tuners. My LDGZ11 Pro I think will pair nicely with this rig.

[@paaao]

It has a built in tuner from what I read

[@pablogallego152]

Enhorabuena!!! Tus vídeos son top; muy ilustrativos y formativos. La 705 me parece una radio muy completa; el precio... 😃

[@PaulGrahamM0PGX]

There are too many things wrong with this radio for me to consider it portable. I like the USB idea (I created an interface that does audio and CAT through one USB lead for the 817), but going to the trouble of including Bluetooth and wi-fi and then not including an ATU? Sounds like marketing took over common sense to me. Still a nice looking radio with LOTS of features. I'm sure they will fly off the shelves. I will wait to see the 'in the flesh' reviews :)

[@Steven_VE9SY]

It looks great on paper. But my sticking point may be price. I live in Canada. When the 7300 came out and they started to call it the STARTER radio, I was interested. I believe it previewed at $1900! That's not starter price. Took me 2 years to put a few extra bucks aside. I have no regrets in that purchase. But I fear here that the 705 will sit in the $1500 range. That's just way to much. If it's a much better price, then I will definitely look into one. It looks like it's going to be an amazing radio. To bad there's no tuner, but then again, I'm looking at costs, so the lack should bring it down a bit!

[@OH8STN]

Agreed. I'm also worried about the cost here in Scandinavia. With all the hype for the 818, the Retailer's drove the prices up to a ridiculous amount. It was the same with the 7300.

[@malverninuk]

I think for someone who had not used the new Icom, you gave a really good review !

[@MrM2hb]

Finally a new radio I am excited to buy. It's what Yaesu 818 should have been.

[@brianfrommaumee]

Julian, as always an excellent video, with some very good points. Like you I'm eagerly awaiting the arrival of this radio, and as you said, Icom just about wiped out the market for the Yaesu FT-817/818 with this announcement. My concern about the radio has nothing to do with the internals - whatever they are they will be better than just about anything currently on the QRP market. My real concern is survivability and, more specifically, how well will this radio can stand up to constant field use. Icom isn't marketing this as a 'shack queen'; it's clearly designed to go to the field. Yet it doesn't seem to have even a basic IP rating (or as someone commented on FB, "it'll have the IP rating of whatever zip lock bag you put it in"). I also have concerns about how well the touch screen will stand up to dusty & humid conditions. Still, I'm sure there'll be one in my field kit in the next year or two!

[@butchdingle1000]

nice review, but think the Icom 705 will be too expensive and as I understand its only true SDR up to 25mhz ? so not like 9700 on vhf/uhf, maybe im wrong but no 70mhz,atu and a couple of quirky things which once released will no doubt be resolved to my liking, still before SDR type radios we had solid state kit and before that values, it dont matter what you use as long as you are enjoying your hobby. Happy radio guys and thanks again for a great piece Julian.

[@MyTube4Utoo]

Xiegu managed to add a very capable tuner in the X5105. It seems as though Icom -could- should have done the same with the IC-705.

[@OH8STN]

Agreed. I think operators are going to get around this by using a resonant antennas. They perform much better then the Broadband antennas requiring a tuner.

[@stewartrv]

I was thinking pretty much the same as you when I saw the streaming video announcement from ICOM at the show early of this year. I was just slightly disappointed that it was a prototype and not yet available., also worried about how much they will charge for it. I hope they make it at a really good price because they can then sell millions of these.

[@joeframo3347]

You're absolutely right I'm very disappointed in my Yaesu ft-818 so disappointed I got rid of it I am not impressed no difference from that to the 817 very upset I'm looking at this Icom 105 very seriously I believe it's going to be a winner but I hope it's not overly expensive tell me your thoughts on it thank you for your great presentation and your video like always

[@OH8STN]

I totally agree with you. I was very disappointed with the Yaesu ft-818 , so much so that I'm a video on why the "update" was a fail. As far as pricing goes, I think we're going to see the same thing we saw with the ft-818. The big ham radio channels in partnership with the ham radio retailers would drive be retail price of the 705 up initially. This is really a shame, but it's how things work. After some time the price will come down and people like you and me will be able to afford it. The wonderful thing which should happen, is manufacturers like elecraft and Yaesu will have to step up. No one will buy those radios anymore if they don't consider the data mode operator in the field.

[@joeframo3347]

@@OH8STN hey my friend how much you think the 705 is going to cost?

[@OH8STN]

@@joeframo3347 Hey Joe. It's a great question but honestly I didn't speculate and I don't have any idea. I'm hoping it comes in around the same as a kx2 or less. My fear is that the retailers will drive the price up higher initially.

[@scottintexas]

Proprietary batteries tend to be expensive making the value of USB charging even greater bc you can use a far cheaper usb battery to extend power. Presuming average use, what size/power solar panel would keep this perpetually charged?

[@mikemiles3068]

Great video as usual 👍❗️ I am from the old, old, school of hams, like 1955 vintage and I do not do digital of any kind, BUT ❗️ it’s not to say i won’t, in the future. See an old man can even be open minded, I am trying to decide weather to get the 706 or the Elicraft And getting too old to venture out but I am going to have something small, versatile, and portable at the drop of a hat.

[@tonykg5ton897]

Ray Novak from ICOM and Josh from HRCC brought me here. They dropped your name in a live stream 9.27.19 Ham Radio Operators Who Have Saved Lives 01:15:44 mark

[@OH8STN]

Tony I'm extremely grateful for you letting me know. Please drop a link to that video as a comment to mine. That way it won't get filtered as spam. Thanks again, it's very much appreciated.

[@GoranSkular]

I really like it and will buy it.. but I would really like that it has a little more power for kicks... At least 20W. I am not so into QRP for now, but who knows...

[@W9HJBill]

Yup, I love my Xiegu G90 with 20 watts (all the time) using a 12Ah LiFePO4 battery and a 10-80M HWEF antenna. Since the G90 has an antenna tuner, I don't have to worry about setting up the antenna (which is resonant) in "less than ideal" field conditions which will effect even a resonant antenna. Granted it's an external battery, but I can do 20 watts ALL the time for upwards of 6 hours (before I put my portable solar charger). And everything (including fishing line and sling shot and battery monitor, fits into a tiny go pack that is only 12" x 9.5" x 6". Also, with EVERYTHING, my go kit, including the G90 and battery, comes in at $810. I would be surprised if 705 comes in at less than $1000 just for the radio.

[@johnwilson-gw4ox]

Hi..does this mean, if you were just getting into this field, you would go strait to the ICOM IC-705, by passing your previous set up.?

[@OH8STN]

This is a magnificent question! We must consider I have a qro set up, and I have a qrp setup. My qro setup is the ft-891 and that is fine as it is. My qrp setup that's the Yaesu ft-817 with the 10 watt amplifier and Raspberry Pi. If I had to do it all over again, building up a new qrp radio I would buy immediately the IC 705. There's no chance I would ever by the ft-818 again. Absolutely wonderful question and I'm surprised no one asked me sooner. Thanks for the question and thanks for watching. 73 Julian oh8stn

[@brandongraham3509]

I agree that there Ft818 was a failure and thought the same when I first saw it. I got the KX3 in 2018 for field portable use in Greenland and Svalbard while doing geology field work. The cables and coupling of RF on the sound card was detrimental. The low power on receive allowed for prolonged battery used, but with generators for field equipment, it was not as necessary. For light weight operations where size and weight really matter, especially when ham radio is not a primary or secondary activity, the more efficient KX2/3 may be better. However, once external interfacing with a computer for digital modes and if the screen can be shut off, the IC705 looks to be an excellent solution, especially if you are around non-hams and they can see what is going on. IC705 Cons: Working with dirty hands or very cold conditions, the touch screen could be a problem. I'd be worried about scratching the screen, or finger dexterity with or without gloves. Other than that, the layout and specs look to be excellent for portable operations that don't require ultra light and small system. If this was around when I was buying, I would definitely consider it. Thank you for your excellent input on the new system and the potential it has. I always enjoy your content.