Omega Seamaster 300 vs. Omega Seamaster Diver 300 - Comparison & Which One Is Right For You

[@christopherjensen5007]

I purchased a blue Seamaster Diver 300 on the bracelet yesterday. I've ordered a blue rubber strap for it. I already own the NTTD Omega! Call it an early birthday present for myself. I'm 56 years old next month!

[@TheJohnGalt1945]

The Diver 300 was my first luxury watch. I love the waved dial and actually think the helium escape valve gives it a unique look.

[@christopherjensen5007]

I purchased a blue Seamaster Diver 300 on the bracelet yesterday. I've ordered a blue rubber strap for it. I already own the NTTD Omega! Call it an early birthday present for myself. I'm 56 years old next month!

[@John..18]

@@christopherjensen5007 I have my black dial 300m on an Isofrane rubber strap, it's the comfiest strap / bracelet, I've ever worn,, 👍,, Rubber for summer, steel for winter,, 👌

[@nolanmonke4330]

me too

[@gilean6179]

@@christopherjensen5007 great. i plan to get this on my 50th birthday.

[@MrFenris75]

I own the SMP 300 and love it. However, if the Seamaster 300 had been out at the time in its most recent design I would have bought that in a heart beat. I think both are just absolutely beautiful watches and you just can't go wrong with an Omega.

[@Docmeff1]

I tend to rewatch Teddy's videos more than most about watches and that's bc I learn something additionally each time I watch. I wish I could like them multiple times.

[@disasterpiecemusic]

I love the newer version on the 300, before I bought it, I had always hoped that they would do a true sandwich dial and remove some text from the dial, and with the recent release, I bought it almost instantly. The 300 as it is today is the best evolution of the model.

[@nathanhau4895]

Great way to put pieces side by side. Would love to see a Submariner, Seadweller and Deepsea comparison.

[@christianhelgesen4176]

Agreed

[@benmildenhall8344]

Yes please!

[@---_---_---_---_---_---]

Make this happen teddy

[@jlopez1017d]

Throw the Tudor Pelagos in there

[@CapeCodBelle]

I've had my Omega Seamaster "diver 300" in a quartz version since 2006. It's my everyday watch and still going strong after 16 years! I love as much today as I did when I got it. I have other watches, but this one has my heart!

[@marcod.r.3299]

If you´re hesitant to chose between both, a great option is the first generation Planet Ocean 2201.50.00. It combines the best of both, but without faux patina (faux patina might get boring after a while I think).....and it´s one of the most beautiful divers ever made in my opinion, regardless what brand or price category....Omega just nailed it with that one.

[@DionStabber]

I like the Seamaster 300 a bit more, but I can't justify the increase in price. The Diver 300M has a more elaborate dial/handset and the helium escape valve - I know it doesn't do actually do anything, but it's a feature they had to engineer and include, and it really doesn't seem reasonable to me that a minor movement upgrade while downgrading on those features should somehow equate to such a big increase in price. This makes the Diver 300M seem like the much better deal in my opinion.

[@arbeiteandir2288]

Totally agree

[@drfathertime]

Because when you really think about it and remove the nostalgia and everything, diver 300 is in fact a better watch and a better deal

[@fungus_am0nguz644]

@@drfathertime The Diver 300 might be a better watch IF you are pro diver bc that watch is ugly af, it reminds me of the 90s when the swiss watch industry was kinda lost and putting out some of the most horrible looking watches in their history, thats what the diver 300m reminds of, its a hell of a watch, one of those indestructible tanks but my God is it ugly, even the bracelet is ugly. However i understand Mr. Speaker view: at $6,500 Omega is pushing it with those prices based on the craze of vintage nostalgia.

[@drfathertime]

@@fungus_am0nguz644 well if you ask me, 90s were the era of Omega if you were you ask me, when I see models from late 90s early 00s, there are so many classics! Diver 300 maybe not my cup of tea, but I don't find it ugly af

[@tacomn]

@@drfathertime Well the movement is better in the 300 but it is more expensive for that reason.

[@texex9251]

Great review, I have both the blue dial SM 300 and the white dial SMP 300. They are completely different watches and there is room in a collection for both. My SMP 300 lives on the rubber strap further differentiating them from each other. I think the SM 300 works best casual (jeans and a teeshirt) up to dressy while the SMP 300 works best casual down to a bathing suite.

[@alexandergk9947]

When I look at the omega seamaster, it always reminds me of my grandfather (because he owned the first seamaster released) and James bond. It is absolutely one of my favourite dive watches on the market under 6 grand.

[@ContraNovae]

Tell us more about your grandfather, sounds like a great story there.

[@scbond]

@@ContraNovae I can go one better…I used to have two 🙄

[@TitoCanuso]

It’s all about what you want and what other watches you already have! I have the Diver 300m since it has been my dream watch. The 300 has a more dressier presence and a more vintage look so you can categorize it as a watch with more legacy. On the other hand the diver 300m is a beast and the ultimate sport luxury watch money can buy!!!!! I think someday I will get the 300 for its elegance, design and fínese, it simply screams class. For know I will continue to enjoy my Seamaster 300m Diver in blue with both, the rubber strap with the folding clasp and its original stainless steel bracelet. Great video and comparison!!!

[@ikirikchi]

Teddy, I've always admired how you manage to keep your personal preferences in favor of an unbiased review. That’s why I usually push the like button before watching your videos. By the way I own blue Diver 300 and Aqua Terra (blue ceramic bezel with rubber strap) with a two-barrel quick hour set movement. Love them both.

[@jodysilvia2]

I recently purchased a diver 300 in blue and it's nice , but I have my eyes on the Aqua Terra small seconds in beige , love those twisted lugs and unfortunately the 300 doesn't have twisted lugs .

[@notenoughtime7274]

I actually bought the Seamaster 300 around 6 months ago, as I liked the more heritage/vintage vibe and the domed glass. BUT a few weeks back I ‘upgraded’ to the Diver 300, specifically the Sedna Gold/Steel in Black with rubber bracelet. The Seamaster 300 is nice close up but it’s very subtle, and doesn’t have a lot of wrist presence. I actually don’t like the steel bracelets for either. For the 300 it’s not in keeping with the vintage vibe and I don’t like the style of the Diver, relative say to an Oyster Bracelet. So for me, they’re relatively better with the rubber strap, coupled with the more interesting wavey ceramic dial of the Diver 300, and the presence the Sedna gold / steel combo brings makes that the winner for me personally More generally, I do also think it’s interesting to drill into the specific sub models here. The bronze Seamaster 300 is probably the nicest heritage but comes at a price (not sure it’s good value?). The Diver 300 either in green or the black steel / Sedna gold combos are the nicest in my mind. And again with the rubber strap. Omega are a great brand but I don’t feel steel bracelet design is their forte.

[@johnbrock678]

I have the 300. I bought it unbelievably because I really liked the tapered bracelet better than the bracelet on the Diver 300. I also like that it is a bit understated in appearance. With that said, I’d love to have a Diver 300. I guess the best answer to this face off is to buy both!

[@master_macchiato3222]

I bought the seamaster 300 for a milestone b’day - beautiful - imo just way more classy than the diver. I don’t like the helium valve or glossy bezel of the diver. Diver is still good though

[@Daavi85]

These are both great watches, I love the look of the vintage inspired 300 but the often overlooked original heritage inspired professional diver is the first Gen 42mm Planet Ocean 2500, with it's matte black dial/black bezel and white tri arabics "open 6 and 9 font" with lyre lugs, it's design harkens back to the classic Seamasters of the late 60's while still being of modern finishing and construction, it's more subdued which offers a more toolish aesthetic compared to the newer iterations, it's still my favorite of the modern Omega divers.

[@stevedelgado9128]

I have a 1997 Diver 300 and I still love love this watch! The look and feel are exceptional!

[@vishalkalra2431]

Loved this format, bring on more of this please ! Cheers

[@andywilliams4887]

My trouble is that I love them both! I owned the original 'Bond' SMP Pro 300 bought way back in 2000 and enjoyed it immensely. It made way for my Rolex Sub Date 16610 in 2002 which I still wear often today. Being a sentimental old soul, I'd choose the SMP Diver 300, but I'm patiently waiting to see what may arrive in the next iteration of this icon. Maybe an updated tapered bracelet or choice of case sizes?

[@bnick25352535]

20mm to 18mm taper would be ok anything more would take away the sportiness of the watch.

[@huguninpearl]

My experience with NKUWAN was fantastic. The watch arrived quickly and was exactly as described.

[@CosmoKramer724]

Great comparison video. Diver 300 has, in my opinion, the coolness factor. It’s got bling without being ostentatious and every now and then I’m tempted to laser through a steel door with it! I think you should add “coolness” factor to your categories.

[@seanlinehan1136]

Love the video, and don’t even know what the end result is, so no bias to results! Butttt…the opening comparison I think overlooks one piece and that’s the lug-end design/curvature. I’ve worn both and your video comparison even shows how the flatter design of the 300 creates a gap. The diver 300 hugs bc the lugs are notoriously short and aggressively curve down. Like even in the video I can visually see it lol. Great comparison but that really does make a difference.

[@tacomn]

So the 300 diver fits better?

[@seanlinehan1136]

@@tacomn on the principles of wrist hugging, absolutely. Look at the profile of both and the seamaster 300 has less taper (slightly) and with a larger underside it sits higher at the wrist edges. Case height seems less concerning to me at the center point of the wrist versus the edges, bc that’s where a gap is creTed

[@cmg799]

Loved the format Teddy…would love to see more

[@ryangochuico]

Aluminum bezel and no date would be my deal breakers. Also, i prefer the look of the diver 300m even without the link to james bond. Personally the james bond connection was never even factored into my purchase of the diver 300. Great video as always 🥰

[@salam-s9y]

My preferred choice is the Planet Ocean 39.5mm. Its stunning and robust. But more pricey for sure.

[@Rielle212]

I love this type of video. I am obsessed with all things Omega Seamaster. The in depth comparison is awesome. Thanks for this!

[@spiral2012]

I have the diver in green. Love it so much I contemplated getting it in blue to match any outfit. I think spending the extra grand on the 300 may actually make more sense.

[@sylversyrfer6894]

Very helpful! Thank you Teddy! Please include more of these side-by-side comparisons.

[@Kermit26297]

I’ve been comparing these two models. Excellent timing. Keep up the great work.

[@sumitkar2704]

As always a great episode Teddy. I am not a watch collector even though I love watches. I only have the 3861 Hesalite Speedy Moonwatch and absolutely love it. There is also a familial tie with my fathers introduction of me to the Omega brand some 40 years ago and my brothers tie in with NASA and the space program in he 80's. The watch means so much to me. The Seamaster 300 to me is just spectacular in every way and has the vintage feel that reminds me of times spent with my Dad. It will be next watch for sure. The Diver is great but too blingy for me. My third watch will be the Deville Prestige Orbis edition - another spectacular and under the radar watch with a great story that is also very personal to me. To me, not as a collector but as just someone who loves watches, the stories are more important than the specifications. The diver probably has better specifications than the 300 but I would choose the Seamaster 300

[@cajanir]

Both are excellent watches that look as if simple refinements could take them to the next level. The 300 seems a touch too retro (vintage lume, very plain dial, lollipop seconds, etc) while the diver 300 is a bit too modern/busy (elaborate dial combined with elaborate bracelet and unnecessary helium escape valve).

[@israelgudino9079]

My first luxury watch was a diver 300 36mm quartz. Love that watch and was what sparked this hobby.

[@grinner68]

Having owned both, I agree with everything Teddy said, except the rating on the bezel. I’d say they are essentially the same. The diver 300 has ceramic, but painted numbers. The 300 has aluminum, but lumed numbers. And the feel is the same. The 300 is matte, the diver is shiny. They are different, but either is great. It’s up to preference. In that case, they would be a tie, which I think is appropriate. It’s really up to which you like better. For me, it’s the 300. Sold the diver 300 to get it.

[@max.loves.watches]

I wish the Planet Ocean 600m was part of this conversation. It strikes a great balance between modern and vintage and is my favourite of the three.

[@brandonday9001]

I agree! Yes, the PO is larger and it gets hate for that but it was designed to be the bigger rougher model and its their higher end modern diver.

[@jolness1]

I like evenrything about the PO but it’s very thick. I have one and a modern smp300 and then PO is thicker and heavier enough that even with a snug bracelet it want to rotate badly. I still really like it but would love to see omega target a thinner case across the board. Rolex manages to make a watch thinner, with a lower center of gravity but it’s every bit as solid feeling. Oh my gosh aren’t too thick to wear or anything I still think they’re very good watches but personally I think they would be a little better if they could trim them down to be similar in thickness to the Rolex counterpart. Millimeter thinner Seamaster professional doesn’t sound like much but it drastically changes where of the watch

[@brandonday9001]

@@jolness1 I agree slimmer would be nice but you'd likely have to cut things like the HE valve and the exhibition casebacks. Omega pushes innovation and tech more then other brands like Rolex who is stagnant so I'm sure it'll be a matter of time

[@drfathertime]

@@brandonday9001 am I the only one who doesn't care about see thru back? Honestly if a bog standard caseback can shave 2mm of its size, I would gladly take it

[@brandonday9001]

@@drfathertime what about the beauty of a movement?

[@caglioso]

I have the non-diver 300 and I can’t stress enough how much it opens up after changing out the bracelet for a nice vintage leather strap.

[@RAJCruler]

Loved the vid. More videos like this!

[@loganoftherockies9453]

Oh, Teddy, you're breaking my heart about the helium valve on the SMP300. Of course, the point is not that we actually need to go saturation diving, any more than the point of owning a Ferrari is that we actually need to drive over 200mph, any more than the point of a Speedy is that we actually need to go to the moon, or the point of the Ultra Deep is that we'd actually like to strap a watch outside our submarine and head down the Mariana Trench. The point, to me anyway, is that Omega has produced a sports watch that actually has and can do those things. And you know, James Bond just might end up in a saturation diving situation unexpectedly at any time...there's a particular ethos this way to sports watches that I think is missing in this video. But beyond that, agree on all other counts completely, and excellent video as always!

[@turkercakmak1406]

the best watch comparison video i hv ever seen. perfect

[@martinkaplan1805]

Thanks, Teddy. Really like this approach. Using comparison categories like this is reminiscent for me of TGV’s approach, and I’d like to encourage you to keep at it!

[@Sirkelsag666]

I have the Seamaster 300 in black. Absolutely love it, wears like a charm! Lovely taper on the bracelet aswell!

[@coopsavid8964]

Would be interested in a comparison between the Oris aquis and the Rado captain Cook.

[@TheMannimammut]

The Seamaster 300 was my first real luxury watch and love at first sight. Absolut classy and timeless..

[@XPGreatScottXP]

im looking at both of these watches and am having a hard time deciding between the two. I think the diver 300 is the win for me , I am not a fan of Fo patina, the diver 300 panda is so crisp too. this video definitely gives me more of an objective look into the decision process. thanks again Teddy!

[@dthamrick1]

Bought the diver yesterday. No regrets.

[@kemalcanocak]

Good one Teddy, Omega played with the Semaster 300 series alot, i guess it is now 4th generation or whatever... They changed the ceramic insert to Aluminium and now they turn back to ceramic for their summer blue version.... I mean all things considered, even they would have been at the same price range, Diver is better overall pick.. Both of them has METAS certified so i do not see any improvement except tiny 5 hours increase in total reserve... On the other hand having 2 barrels in the movement might increase your service cost in long term. My only feedback to diver300 would be the weight. They should somehow decrease its weight from 207 to 150-180 without playing the model alot...

[@RedFuryBooks]

Love the side by side comparison. More please!

[@aslamc9288]

I had the first generation SM300 and while I loved to look at it, it never felt like it wore quite right on my wrist. But with the updates they made to this MkII version, with the slimmer case and redesigned end lugs, I’m really interested in getting it. The Diver 300M just never captured my heart; the wave dial, the complicated bracelet, even the HEV, which doesn’t bother me much, but it’s additive; it all just makes the Diver 300M a bit too fussy looking for me. And the SM300 is a no-date watch, which I love.

[@luisdiegoperez1786]

This new format taking into consideration specific factors to decide which one is “better” I LOVED it. Being part of a scientific method career, this for me is THE WAY. Great video as usual. I’m biased in this one because I’ve had a crush on the Professional Diver 300 since 1995 when I saw Pierce Brosnan wearing it meanwhile drinking a Martini. 👌🏻. Thank you for the great content

[@emiliorossi7851]

A great review. I personally would go with the 300 (black). I love the vintage taste as well as the new caliber.

[@mr.godiva5376]

Love this comparison table!!!!

[@musicgt17]

Great comparison that detailed out the experience i have with both watches (both black). Both watch are versatile and complement each other in different occasion. In my experience, 300 wears better in bracelet, leather strap and nato while diver is better on rubber.

[@JohnHausser]

Nice review! Cheers from San Diego California

[@Hnair1982]

Teddy I went to the AD after watching your video on Breguet. Awestruck since trying those on, especially the traditional line with retrograde date. Nothing else seems nice after that. Unfortunately visited the Omega store to check the new green sea master, but by then I was a Breguet fan

[@MrFreddyd3]

Ahhhh the 90s. The old 1120 movement Seamaster Pro indeed was my gateway drug as well.

[@chrisgrieves1468]

Nice job Teddy and yes more please! For the smaller-wristed such as you and myself (same wrist size) the 300 is an easy winner. I just can't pull the 300M off. Also the grip on the bezel just doesn't work for me on the 300M, and not a fan of the handset, whereas the broad-arrow looks great. All that said, in terms of value for spec the 300M is just more watch for less cash. So a very interesting side-by-side here. I still prefer my blue BB58 though....

[@jaybcarlile]

Great comparison! 100% agreed the naming convention is unnecessarily confusing. But so be it. Also, the bracelet on the SMP Diver 300 needs to gooooo. Come on refresh in 2023! Until then, rubber strap it is for me as well.

[@kimcoulter806]

The only features (imo) that are superior on the 300 are being able to move the individual hour hand by itself and the bracelet. The bracelet on the diver (imo) is an embarrassment for Omega. Great review and… BTW… Karan in Vegas says hi! 👊👊😜

[@freshmindnow]

Yes please, definitely do more of these.

[@mohammedtaqi700]

Omega Seamaster 300 Divers watch is the exact colour I have with the amazing bracelet. I just love it

[@Maarten_official_account]

Nice comparison of these 2 watches. But if you want the perfect allround Seamaster you want to go with the NTTD Seamaster…only drawback could be the price but you forget all about that when you see it on your wrist.

[@ae-ca602]

Thanks for this video, Teddy! It helped me make a decision on which seamaster to buy. I was never fully convinced about the diver 300 and I was always thinking of going with the aqua terra because of the jumping hour hand. Now Knowing that the 300 has a jumping hour hand, it is definitely my number one choice as it ticks many boxes for me. Sporty, nicer bracelet, jumping hour hand, no date which I prefer. I also like the hands of the 300 better.

[@darrenmay3578]

Great idea for a video. I agree the Diver 300 takes it and I always wondered why the two are priced differently. Still wondering to be honest as even in the movement, you trade date function for 5 hours longer power reserve. Jumping the hour hand on the 300 is not a biggie. More a matter of preference and not, to my mind, worth $1000 price difference. Great job on the comparison!

[@BrittPearceWatches]

OUSH! Such a tough comparison! Aesthetically, it has to be the Seamaster Diver 300. But only a pre ceramic 😜

[@chrisj2841]

What about a fan poll about this ? Thanks a lot !!!

[@kkrsnn5632]

300 with a leather strap is a luxury retro dive dress watch. The other is a luxury bling diver sports watch.

[@minnami778]

I knew the Seamaster because of the dive 300. Then I saw the 300 and it strangely starts to grow on me even though I didn’t like it at all at first glance. Both are beautiful that you can actually have both 😂. Now I understand why many people love n have many omega watches.

[@tbip2001]

Do omega no longer offer quarts watches? I remember 14 years ago friend purchasing his first 'nice' watch. It was a quartz seamaster and it was 1200 quid. I can't believe how far process have climbed.

[@kimcoulter806]

Excellent review and I got a kick outta your reference the Diver looking much better on a white strap. With the exception of the black bezel black wave dial “Bond,” I changed my other 3 out to white rubber straps too. Made the watches “pop” much better imo.

[@bber45]

SMP 300 Hands down. I've owned both current and previous SMP 300s and never had any issues and I get plenty of compliments. I did see the Seamaster 300 in person and it is a solid watch. But the faux Patina and Non-Ceramic Bezel really are buzz killers. Especially if you're paying 6k for a watch. Yeah I get what Omega was going for but it's not 1950's any more.

[@garethwilliams8549]

Diver 300 is my dream watch. Absolutely class.

[@JamyRyals]

Between the two, I’d go Seamaster 300 instead of the diver. For me the harder choice is AquaTerra or Globemaster… I love a sports daily but that pie plate though.

[@siblej1]

I wonder how many of those He escape valves get used?

[@Coempi73]

I love both, but I do not like the escape valve on the Diver. Cannot afford either of them, though. Anyways, I like this new type of videos. Keep them coming!

[@petarkostesic8570]

This is my exact dilemma 😅. There’s a Pelagos in the mix too, as a matter of fact I started to thonk about the Pelagos and the AD didn’t have it, so I went to an Omega AD around the corner, thinking I’ll just try them on, as I considered them to be on the upper level of what I’m prepared to spend. The 300 Heritage was my favourite avcording to photos I looked at previously, and I dodn’t even feel the need to try on the 300M, nut the saleswoman was encuraging - so I tried the black one on. Instant love. I’m waiting to get back from vacaytion and pull the trigger on a black diver on a bracelet :)) Thank you Tedsy for this comparison!

[@andreaiacolina]

Great video with very interesting and useful points of view. Great job Teddy, I really appreciated this episode.

[@azn12ice]

Can you do a review on the Omega Co-axial watches?

[@stevedeffley6128]

I own the white Diver 300 and the blue 300 and I love them both. The diver is a lovely watch but in my opinion the 300 is a far better buy. It feels better finished, the clasp is smaller, the sandwich dial is stunning and that lollipop seconds hand is beautiful.

[@Enlessdreamer]

Seamastes 300 is the definitive watch That second hand counter balance design is fantastic.

[@stevefox8605]

Got the SM300, previous model without the sandwich dial...much prefer mine, more like the original.( Hate the bubbled crystal, lollypop second hand & awful sandwich Panerai numbers...) Was tempted by the 300 Diver, but thought it was too flashy for my lifestyle ( biker) & too generic indices,whereas my 300 just screams Omega.... Just wish they'd bring back the 2254!!! Cheers mate 👍🏻

[@BGRUBBIN]

You make a great case for more of these vids!

[@thetruebatman4632]

The patina 300 on the Bond NATO is just one of the most beautiful things i’ve ever seen.

[@omegafanboyian]

How & Why do people get confused and mixed up with these two great timepieces. Seamaster Professional (42mm Ceramic bezel & date) Seamaster 300 (41mm no date) Good shootout Teddy

[@franziscoschmidt]

I really like the nekton Diver. It gives of a more unique experience

[@randalneal3773]

Like the new Seamaster 300. It gets my vote, but I like the new Aqua Terras even more.

[@drnick40]

Thank you Teddy! Both are phenomenal watches and represent unsurpassed value. However Seamaster 300 Heritage is my choice.

[@fernandorivera9701]

I love the vintage look of the Seamaster 300

[@Kyle-xk4ke]

Great comparison

[@joepeacock9990]

I liked this comparison format. Consider whether all categories should be evenly weighted. Seems like some are more important than others.

[@theenavybluemonster]

It’s the Seamaster 300 Professional vs the Seamaster 300 Heritage. That’s how I tell them apart. If the Seamaster 300 Heritage ever gets rid of the fauxtina, fully brush the bracelet, and update the lug width to 20mm, then I’d be a buyer.

[@LanguagesWithAndrew]

The 300 is an excellent dive watch and worth the price (for my money, I'd take it over a Submariner, especially if we were talking about the titanium Seamaster in blue), whereas the Diver 300 is a good entry-level, luxury, dive watch that used to be appropriately priced by Omega at around $3500, but is now overppriced at its current MSRP of $5400. I understand that they needed to up the price due to inflation, but an appropriate ("appropriate" in my opinion) price increase would've landed it at around $4000-4500.

[@thorodinson376]

Omega is not entry level.

[@robcameron9351]

Love this style of video a lot!!

[@Tele_gram_me_Young_Static]

Thanks for watching and showing love. Congratulations 🎁🎉🎈you have been shortlisted for a prize !!! Send me a text above to acknowledge your prize .

[@wolfgangpollich9865]

Really enjoyed this comparison! In my opinion the diver 300 is more appealing. It kind of has that certain something that keeps your eyes on it. But like Teddy i would prefer a rubber strap. I would love to see more videos like that comparing for example different variants of the same watch in terms of complication and price-performance ratio. Keep it up Teddy

[@matiasferrer4700]

The 300 dial on the Diver 300 minus the helium valve. The no date movement of the 300, of course.

[@zachschlabach8928]

Case finish should be equal. Heritage should be for the SMP, the 300 is an homage to the old watch with the new chase to old desigsns, but has no herritage itself. Otherwise, I think Teddy was spot on. Wish they would fit the 8900 in the SMP and make the bezel more usable in the water.

[@danielburke9980]

I’m going to get a two tone Seamaster within the next week or two. I’ve been staring at the black/Sedna gold SMP 300 and the Seamaster 300 for days and can’t make a decision. They’re both stunning. I think the bracelet of the 300 is what’s drawing me away from the diver. Two-tone on a rubber bracelet just doesn’t seem right, yet that suits the diver so well.

[@ozmondos]

I like the Seamaster 300 more, I prefer it's bracelet and because it doesn't have a date function. Teddy please review citizen nb1060-12l, also would love to see Kevin's reaction on it's dial and the fact that it's hand finished to a certain degree at that price point.

[@guillaumemichel3156]

Great style of video! Excellent idea to compare watches, please keep doing this. I must add you're doing it in a much more professional manner than most watches channels.

[@LeriChichinadze]

Why are there wrinkles on the dial at min 1:43 ? Thanks for good videos btw!