🐢 ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES by Charles Darwin - FULL AudioBook 🎧📖 P1of3 | Greatest🌟AudioBooks V2

[@MartianManHunter2258]

00:00 Introduction 00:44 Chapter 1 2:17:07 Chapter 2 3:09:23 Chapter 3 3:55:20 Chapter 4 6:27:45 Chapter 5

[@RE-ye4ev]

Thank you.

[@2gramsovcoke]

Ty wil listen to all over and over by ty for pinning it.

[@Chinnnnuz]

Legend.

[@alexsandoni]

Chapter 1 actually starts at 44:50

[@majdshehab3311]

thank you very much that was really helpfull, I searched the first chapters really long till I found your notice

[@hugobadillo2799]

It’s incredible how insignificant and how important we are at the same time.

[@L.I.B.]

Or maybe his theory is false and we are just incredible because we were created.

[@KingTubeAR]

@@L.I.B. and in that theory the one who created is a piece of shit

[@thinkingoutloud675]

​@@L.I.B. with that analogy that should go for every living organism. Because im in equal awe at their uniqueness. And in the case of the God(s) that supposedly created us their have been hundreds throughout the history of humankind how do we know who's accurate.

[@L.I.B.]

@@thinkingoutloud675 We don't. but with evolution it's the servival of the fitest. With a creation is your not the creator so you can't say your better than me. Their using the stroy of the creation to become the creator.

[@casanova1x189]

Bro needs to worry about the origin of grammar 💀

[@Cookiemonster-mo2iu]

It's amazing to see just how much Darwin worked out correctly despite the small fossil record and primitive scientific method of the times. Very impressive!

[@kseke25]

Cookiemonster He followed the evidence, wherever it led.

[@thetruthchannel349]

Whats amazing is that over 90% of the information in the book was NEVER tested before it went to print and even the concept of Natural Selection was one he stole from Wallace who stole it from Pattrick Matthew which is about the same amount of material from this book that have been disproven. It is NOTABLE that when Darwin pointed to what he called 'the greatest evidence for evolution' was FOUND TO BE A HOAX.

[@siim605]

@@thetruthchannel349 Are you still a creationist now

[@timtebone1843]

@@siim605 . Cleary, she wanted to burn the book before it was printed lol. That's what they do

[@thetruthchannel349]

@@siim605 *Am i still anti-evolution? Why wouldnt i be? The more we learn the more Darwinism is quietly neglected because its easier to sneak away from a perpetuated lie than it is to announce that you participated in it. Science has known for over 65 years that Darwinism is fantasy but like the CVD narrative and rhetoric it gave the academic institution power and leverage it isnt willing to give up.*

[@hejmeddig3103]

Thanks alot ! I don't believe that we originated from a single primordial ancestor but i wanna learn all about it...this is what I'm writing my thesis on

[@daydays12]

I hope you will be persuaded by Darwin's meticulous work. What DO you think the origin of species is if you do not agree with Darwin? Consider the huge quantity of evidence Darwin presented in the mid 19th century and all the additional evidence discovered in the more than 150 years of science since then

[@debasishbisoi9957]

Thankyou sir thankyou very very much for uploading this videos....

[@jakejake7932]

44:44

[@ZOMBIELUIS666]

THANK YOU! ! ! ! !

[@sandrafriesen8041]

Oh thank you so much!

[@SapienSafari]

❤️

[@socksoppressmytoes476]

Good man

[@joshkelland6050]

I love you

[@Davinci637]

Este libro es simplemente extraordinario. Uno aprende bastante sobre Naturalismo leyéndolo. Antes de leerlo mis conocimientos de Naturalismo sólo estaban a nivel básico. Es un libro realmente increíble.

[@bellefleur7457]

32:40 introduction

[@andrewthomas4636]

"The presentation of favored races"

[@mottahead6464]

Great audio book collection. Really impressive. I'm looking forward to seeing in it the audiobook version of Sapiens : A brief history of humankind by Yuval Noah Harari.

[@arawiri]

I love fish.

[@gevinrajapakshe784]

Thank you.

[@aubreetanner9543]

1:41:45 Leaving this as a bookmark

[@notthatbitchagain6857]

Glad l found the Libravox of this piece The version read by Dawkins is out, but something about his voice rubs me the wrong way. While l appreciate his roll in the Horsemen, I'd still rather hear another voice for such a long work.

[@daydays12]

I agree. I can't listen to even his own books when read by him because of his voice.

[@SleepyPenguin-8og]

Today i met an african american who said he was a blackfoot/cherokee indian. Anythings possible. The entire worlds one big wwe storyline. Lol.

[@metaspacecrownedbytime4579]

Selection can not occur without the discrimination by an agent, as in when an agriculturalist selects what he or she believes is a superior plant or animal warranted for further cultivation for it's unique desirable features, features desired by the selector.

[@thedevilhimself8521]

Except animals with traits that promote survival live longer and therefore reproduce more frequently so those traits are “selected” for by nature.... no agent involved other than the breeding animals.

[@trexasaurus5322]

Hm what do you think happens when an animal with less favorable genes/attributes is born? They die younger and have a harder time breeding compared to an animal with favorable genes and attributes. That is literally natural selection.

[@scottgates6993]

4:00 "...and in like manner" with echo effect. LOL! What was that for, dramatic effect? But this is something I've wanted to read/listen to for many years. Thank you.

[@AnthonyL0401]

Maybe echo is for parenthetical sections?

[@Kcoolin]

Great audio book! it seems like a wise orangutan from spongebob read it to me

[@pendabaldeh9261]

Waaw oh thanks for uploading this today our science but I don't believe weda it WS true but through this I WS enable to know an understand thanks

[@EarlFaulk]

Inb4 Creationist flood the comment section.

[@seannisperos7006]

inb4 retards from the gayming community show up

[@EarlFaulk]

Alejandro Teruel The only propaganda is coming from the creationist side. The Discovery Institute did not want to defend ID (creationism) in a court of law only one scientist did and was destroyed on the stand. What empirical facts are you contending that are propaganda because they conflict with your favorite holy book?

[@EarlFaulk]

Uh....it has to do with biological processes not inequality of races. Ppl get hung up on the title claiming it is racist. The term breed and races of life were interchangeable at thst time.

[@EarlFaulk]

I can tell you never read anything but stuff from creationist sources. Either that or you are a troll. Nice false dichotomy btw. I dont havs to pick one because macro evolution is speciation not racial superiority. For the record i am not a racist. Quit misdirecting...by the way speviation is when two or more populations grow apart genetically do much that they cant intervreed

[@EarlFaulk]

Alejandro Teruel No it DOES NOT It has nothing to do with racial superiority or social issues it is a biological theory. It is ironic that you accuse me of making a strawman argument when that is what you have been doing all this time. I understand the theory of evolution quite well. Also, Everything I have ever read about Darwin including his own words seems to indicate that he was very progressive for his time. I have yet to see one statement that has not been taken out of context to prove that he was a racist. If accepting a theory means I am a racist then I am one. I accept gravitational theory too does that mean I am an alchemist Like Newton was?

[@tsunakbayev]

👍

[@truethinker221]

My little dog Skippy proves evolution. I asked where he came from he said Wolf. I asked him again and he got mad and said Wolf Wolf !

[@Tom-rg2ex]

Dogs were bred from wolves by humans, not evolved through natural selection. House cats would be a better example of an animal that evolved into domestication.

[@sweetpotato8138]

What is the 5 types of species Developed by charles?

[@socksoppressmytoes476]

Bookmark 57:00

[@gwhiff124]

1:30:00

[@tonton1626]

Hello , do you have videos in French language please ? thank you very much😃

[@ophiolatreia93]

Just stop showering, and eat loads of garlic. That will be French. Haw he haw he haw

[@spire393]

No

[@spire393]

@@ophiolatreia93 bad you man.

[@inthedark334]

So I'm about 1 hour and almost 30 minutes into this and he's no longer talking about science he's talking about his opinion of what he might think could have happened, because natural selection selects it does not create anything, the fact that as I'm listening to this guy he has some good points, but he destroys his entire argument by trying to say that we came from animals or that man is a animal, but I'll listen to the entire thing so far an hour into it it was common sense it was just on the concept of kinds, and the fact that depending on the kind of animal and the kind of food they eat and where they're raised will depend on how they adapt to their environment that scientific that's realistic but you're never going to get one animal turning into a completely different kind of animal, it's always going to stay a dog it's always going to stay a cat just a different variation of a dog or cat.

[@lifeisabadjoke5750]

It takes years to evolve into different species. For example look at a sperm cell, it takes a whole year just for a baby to evolve from a tiny sperm cell that looks like a worm into the cute babies we see after their born. Evolution takes centuries or thousands or even million years for things to evolve into different species.

[@inthedark334]

@@lifeisabadjoke5750 oh boy okay pay very close attention to what I'm about to tell you because you know nothing of human biology, I work 10 years in the medical field it takes nine months for a baby to develop in a woman's womb, the sperm do not turn into a baby obviously you've never studied human biology a day in your life from what I'm hearing here or you've never actually worked in a hospital environment, the sperm primarily if you actually put it under a microscope is mostly made up of protein but it's a very specific kind of protein the moment the sperm hits the woman's egg this causes a chain reaction within the egg which turns on certain cells inside of the egg pretty much flipping the switch on for the egg to start growing the egg is sent down the fallopian tube into where it is supposed to be developed, sometimes when women get fertilized there's a problem in the egg can get stuck in the fallopian tube and the woman has to have an abortion or she has a 100% chance of death that's something I've seen a lot of so when it comes to Evolution you're trying to take a belief system which is not scientific and you're trying to use the concept of women getting pregnant to push your religion, oh boy first of all read this book actually read this book from what I've seen so far out of the Origin of Species I have not seen one thing that proves without a shadow of a doubt that we came from a common ancestor that was not human quite the contrary virtually everything that he's saying in this book is kinds produce the same kinds just different variations of a Kind so dogs will produce dogs but they're going to be different kinds of dogs if new information is given to the dog the dog will create a dog it won't create a cat it's always going to be the same kind in that it is a dog Darwin himself in this book criticize is the concept of species he doesn't like a lot of the concepts that modern evolutionists make if a modern-day evolutionist walked up to Darwin and started pedaling nonsense the kind of nonsense I've grown up hearing Darwin would probably slap that person in the face, because Darwin believed in observational experimentation science whereas in today evolutionary theory is not a science it's pseudo-science long away far and long ago something happened, that's not science I've heard people criticizing Kent hovind Kent hovind is a abusive narcissistic Psychopathic man in real life but his claims he makes against evolutionists are 100 percent scientifically factual again I despise the man can't Hoven but I agree with his arguments on creationism just like Darwin I agree so far with a lot of what he's saying that is backed up by reason evidence and common sense but anything that's outside of the scientific method I'm going to say no to, and based on your quote to me I suggest you look into the biology of how a uterus Works in order to understand that it's not the sperm that transforms the sperm creates the action which creates the opposite reaction which is how a baby starts there's actually a medical syndrome very very rare where the woman actually is able to trigger her own egg meaning she's going to actually give birth to a baby through a virgin birth this is insanely rare from what I remember there were only three documented cases of this ever and no sperm was involved but it's insanely rare because it's not normal for that to happen to a woman some piece of information inside of the woman was lost which gave way to this reaction I did not check out how the baby developed because the proteins that go into the baby that trigger the egg are also used to help fertilized and create the baby I suggest you do your research the truth is always in the middle.

[@Pookie2178]

where does chapter 1 start

[@ophiolatreia93]

32:00

[@nataliesabrina]

Can you put a video on earthquake at dawn by Kristiana Gregory?

[@SapienSafari]

Force creationists to listen to this until they accept it.

[@treygonzalez5252]

Black lady, do you know the whole title of the book? On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Survival

[@SapienSafari]

@mike stambaugh Little do you know….JESUS HAD A FINCH FETISH!

[@SapienSafari]

@@treygonzalez5252 Latin man, I’m aware of this, thank you. 🤣

[@treygonzalez5252]

@@SapienSafari Then you shouldn't really be a fan of this guy as his science led to euthanasia, Mengele, the Holocaust, and sterilization.

[@dominicwilliams8452]

@@treygonzalez5252 there was no need for saying black woman, as if its some sort of insult

Hard book

[@achrafmixmix]

how do u protect ur content .. i mean anyone can download this and reupload it in his channel ..

[@Tom-rg2ex]

That's the point of public domain.

[@stujaye8116]

Before I start listening to this book that is only around 150 years old, such a young book for a world thats apparently 4 billion years old. Can someone tell me what evolution is defined as in this book? Did everything start from bacteria? Or an amoeba? Or just the atom? Or even the quark? So that literally everything we see today, plants, animals, people all have a common ancestor? Meaning that macro evolution is clearly proven in this book, that one kind, I.e insect kind evolved into let's say cat kind? And a plant also could turn into a Giraffe if everything has a common ancestor. Would save me a lot of time if one of the more evolved species could explain

[@RaptorFH]

One: "kind" is not a biological term Two: A species cannot be "more evolved" than another Three: Did you even read or even listen to the book? Four: It's not 4 billion its 4.543 billion Five: No a plant cannot turn into a giraffe, that is not a fault in the theory of evolution, its a fault in your understanding of it. Six: it doesn't matter what is said in this particular book. Sure it was very important in our knowledge of how the world came to be but science has moved on the past 164 years.

[@stujaye8116]

@@RaptorFH okay well I won't take you seriously because a) I told you at the start I'm not listening to it until I get some answers, so fail 1 and b) Darwin said exactly that we have a common ancestor, so to you does that mean man's common ancestor was a man? I mean I hope so cos that's exactly how it is, but Darwin meant that everything we see today goes back to a common ancestor meaning a fish then, let's forget plants, turned into a giraffe? And it would seem that entropy didn't happen back then, the stuff got better with age, its only a recent phenomenon. I mean I'll be honest I don't even know why I'm having this conversation over such a deluded Bullshit theory that requires an over active imagination, like anyone can comprehend a million years let alone a billion, pathetic!!!

[@theodoricteh8207]

Is there any British doing this audiobook?

[@vernonknapp7165]

Theodoric Teh What is wrong with the guy reading? I detect a hint of an Irish accent.

[@HiTechKeema]

Theodoric Teh Richard Dawkins did his own abridged recording, but it omits the factually obsolete parts (surprisingly very little). I think it was on KZbin at one point, but it was taken down a while ago. I think you could either buy it or use....... _alternative methods_ to obtain it.

[@KinguCooky]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGiopKGrndtkfas richard dawkins

[@esebams6211]

07:00

[@philipoconnor4263]

All Libri Vox recordings are read by semi literate Americans named Scott, Jimbob, Michael, Cletus, Maryjoe and Katelin. Michael fell asleep several times reading the opening chapter as did his hard pressed audience listening to his torturous voice. The good news, no not Jesus is Lord but evolution can occur more rapidly then many may think and Michael can complete a sentence. Take heart reading well is an evolving skill and art for some.

[@jummyjello9326]

Deng how long is this book

[@ophiolatreia93]

How long is a China man?

[@jummyjello9326]

@@ophiolatreia93 who

[@emadbagheri]

I remember something about "... the favoured races ..." as being a part of the title of this book, it's funny watching everyone take pains to avoid mentioning it! 🤡🌎👉

[@timtebone1843]

dude thinks science and religion are the same thing.. So sad

[@mouli4349]

Babe u r just plain racist

[@strongback6550]

@@timtebone1843 It is now. It demands faith in same way a religion does while refusing to challenges to established narratives.

[@timtebone1843]

@@strongback6550 . Can you explain how? lol. Sounds like you're failing science class and blaming the teacher.

[@doublemosasaur5091]

​@@strongback6550 no brainer comment

[@Fredfredfredfredfredfredfred]

About half way through, you can hear you mom setting off his pager

[@ophiolatreia93]

34:45 whos that?

[@PlaceStillMatters]

13:20

[@EquipteHarry]

Martin Barbara Rodriguez Donna Lee Paul

[@YankeeDoodle2]

This book would make great toilet paper 🧻

[@lifeisabadjoke5750]

So does the Bible and Quran

[@YankeeDoodle2]

@@lifeisabadjoke5750 Only the Quran the Bible is a historically accurate book

[@trevorcox3669]

At the end of the line is that Biden?

[@jayden-jsjincorporated5089]

Yes

[@Deibi078]

my cat comes from tiger

[@RaptorFH]

No?

[@jimketchum3169]

Good old Darwin and his eugenicist, new world order club...

[@androidn.n1891]

Did darwin at last said that his theory of saying that human was evolved from monkey was wrong??

[@connoradams3318]

No.

[@josephkerr5018]

No because that is not what evolution is and because he wasn't wrong.

[@aarizaaban6082]

@mike stambaugh proof?

[@connecticut6221]

F

[@hkhjg1734]

Reminder that if you believe in evolution then you have to accept the fact that the different races evolved differently and thus have different iq levels. Reminder that race is not skin deep and inequalities between races have much to do with different iq levels.

[@grannymotor7559]

Yea you probably belong to underdeveloped "race"

[@hkhjg1734]

Granny's Channel thats a common misconception. Just because some races are better adapted for certain things this dosent necessarily make other races underdeveloped. It simply means each is best suited for its own environments, humans evolutionary speaking are really no different than any other animal.

[@grannymotor7559]

Oh so that's what you're saying) Yea you're right. I presume it's just owing to your non-native roots of English language) Well I got the same issue, in fact half of the world DOES)

[@samferrer]

You can not compare iq level across species ... iq is a concept created by homo sapiens for homo sapiens ... other species have nothing to do with it

[@hamidabdanan7795]

hk hjg when you talk IQ it is difficult to compare. Also sayings some groups have higher IQ, you should mention that the difference could be insignificant. A brilliant white, English speaking, raised in USA professor with highest IQ may not survive more than a few days in deserts of Africa but an uneducated African with a modest IQ (per White's standards) may last his entire life.

[@ericlongoriajr9540]

bs

[@katlynnmahoney2801]

Where does chapter 5 start

[@ophiolatreia93]

After chapter 4 i think.